Aragorn IS d&d ranger, his favorite enemy is nazgul, and he fought em.... once in the whole campaign
@leonardogang48714 жыл бұрын
That’s as Ranger as one gets
@void7354 жыл бұрын
He should have chosen ork
@zacharyhockett62484 жыл бұрын
I'm dying
@ihil46204 жыл бұрын
Drizzt's is everything
@tubesurfer86254 жыл бұрын
Wait, you can actually FIGHT your favoured enemy?
@arsarma18084 жыл бұрын
"Stubs his toes." He broke his foot. That scream is the poor but dedicated actor screaming in pain.
@emmeaberg4 жыл бұрын
Broke two of his toes, but yeah, real dedicated guy.
@blade44084 жыл бұрын
Broke two of his toes, but yeah, real dedicated guy.
@bskec21774 жыл бұрын
Broke two of his toes, but yeah, real dedicated guy.
@Marhathor4 жыл бұрын
Broke two of his toes, but yeah, real dedicated guy.
@Maker08244 жыл бұрын
Broke two of his toes, but yeah, real dedicated guy.
@EG-cm5th3 жыл бұрын
"stubs his toe" ...*insert obligatory comment about how viggo mortenson actually broke his foot during that scene and managed to seemingly turn the pain into a scream of rage*
@MostLikelyMortal3 жыл бұрын
Just look at Arma’s comment and the replies proves how obligatory it is
@jamescanjuggle3 жыл бұрын
i never knew that xD so cool
@Darilon123 жыл бұрын
And that happened before the wideshots of the second film. So he ran across new Zealand with a broken foot. Plus Orlando had fallen off a horse and the scale double of the dwarf had cracked his hip bone. Three cripples running 😂
@didiwin783 жыл бұрын
+1 I came to the comments to say it if anyone else hadent yet.
@Disgruntled_Grunt Жыл бұрын
He also broke his tooth during the Uruk-hai battle at the end of the first movie; refused to go to a dentist and opted to glue it back in place so they could continue shooting.
@spehizle4 жыл бұрын
One thing I heard constantly in my first group was "Aragorn isn't a ranger, because Aragorn doesn't heal people with magic!" And then there's my ass going "...did...did y'all read the books? He literally does that. After the battle of Pelennor Fields. Explicitly and repeatedly. It's like a whole thing."
@MorinehtarTheBlue4 жыл бұрын
Some people have literally only seen the films so I'm going to just assume not
@noraarcadia6354 жыл бұрын
Also, him keeping Frodo from dying long ebough for Arwen to get help. Bro just needed a spell component
@llewtree30134 жыл бұрын
He’s meant to come to Gondor as a healer it’s part of the reason they accept him as king XD
@MorinehtarTheBlue4 жыл бұрын
@@llewtree3013 Well yes but I do think that is, at least in part, a metaphor for a new era of peace.
@blaze5954 жыл бұрын
thats such a stupid argument; even if he couldnt heal, saying that a character that fits the archetype perfectly isnt one because they're TECHNICALLY missing one ability? one thats not even a core part its identity, but is more just from how the game is balanced? come on.
@victorauberg25904 жыл бұрын
Fans: We want Ranger Fix Wizards of the Coast: We already had one (Xanathar's) Fans: We've had one, yes. But what about second Ranger Fix? (Tasha's)
@witchBoi_Connor4 жыл бұрын
Is it a fix for ranger? Eh... kind of... but also not...? The favored enemy replacement takes up your concentration like a spell, which is intentional so it can’t be stacked with hunter’s mark, sure. But that... sucks. Oh, you wanted to cast your spells? Sorry, all your good spells are concentration. And the favored terrain replacement is alright but... weird
@bskec21774 жыл бұрын
XGTE was just new sub-classes. It was like putting new tires on a car with a seized engine. Tasha's is better, but rather nurfed from the UA Vareint Ranger, so I'm a little unhappy still.
@Adoribull13124 жыл бұрын
the favored terrain replacement is fine (altho i think they could have just gotten that feature as a bonus instead of having to lose something), but the favored enemy replacement is just. it's genuinely worse than favored enemy. I'd rather have a feature that's sometimes useful over a feature that's basically dead after 1st level
@GrimHeaperThe4 жыл бұрын
Play adventure league and think about their PHB +1 book rule. Ranger still gets the shaft.
@witchBoi_Connor4 жыл бұрын
@@GrimHeaperThe they still haven’t changed that? Gdi Adventurer’s League SUCKS.
@Marqan4 жыл бұрын
DM: "A group of bandits surround you, clearly looking for a fight." Rangers after seeing this vid: "I use my seismic charge."
@thetimebinder4 жыл бұрын
What do we have here? A couple of customers. I hope they aren't allergic to BASE, because they're about to eat it. Hehe.
@itwasidio17363 жыл бұрын
Rangers with two levels of Artificer: (cocks crossbow) I shoot all of them.
@cosmicremix3113 жыл бұрын
I summon a swarm of Baby Yodas
@salmanmahyuddin83843 жыл бұрын
it's fireball but way higher level and deals force damage
@Cdre_Satori Жыл бұрын
@@itwasidio1736 Puts a fireball wand in the crossbow
@BaznadTypo4 жыл бұрын
Worth noting: Aragorn isnt A ranger, hes THE ranger. The class was based on him. The books are like 100 years old
@GoblinHours-im2ue4 жыл бұрын
Book nerd here; It’s more of 87 years old (ish not exactly)
@GoblinLord4 жыл бұрын
@@GoblinHours-im2ue wait REALLY? damn, I thought they were newer than that....
@joemacleod-iredale28884 жыл бұрын
Agreed. As Conan is THE barbarian and Gandalf is THE wizard.
@BillyJoe13054 жыл бұрын
@@GoblinHours-im2ue I'm going to give an 87 year old book the designation of "like 100"
@kedabro19574 жыл бұрын
@@GoblinLord He made the mistake of thinking Aragorn was in The Hobbit. Tolkien never mentioned rangers until 1954. Which is 66 years ago.
@Lrbearclaw4 жыл бұрын
Ranger main here: A third Ranger in pop culture is Geralt (the Witcher).
@leahbeah15854 жыл бұрын
He feels like more of a blood hunter but blood hunter is very similar to ranger so whatever
@pedropeixe10774 жыл бұрын
I mean, bloodhunter is a non official class inspired in the witchers. Officialy ranger seems to be the most similar class (specially monster hunter).
@Lrbearclaw4 жыл бұрын
@@pedropeixe1077 Exactly. Bloodhunter is Homebrew until it is officially printed or in a module (even the LoL subclasses are technically official).
@andrefelipe78654 жыл бұрын
Also Will from Ranger's Apprentice (great book series and what made me a sucker for the Ranger)
@Answerisequal424 жыл бұрын
I mean mando and geralt pretty much do the same thing.
@Phsstpok3 жыл бұрын
"Rangers have no place in fantasy." - never heard that opinion thrown around at gaming tables... monks and bards were occasionally discussed but rangers... things must have changed a lot at the gaming tables with the last 25 years or so XD
@winnablebadger4 жыл бұрын
Jesus Christ, when you mentioned Geralt i literally said: "He's a ranger too".
@zorawarsingh67954 жыл бұрын
yeah he is kinda more of a fighter mixed with wizard mixed with ranger but yeah definately a ranger too
@caeligocielo56344 жыл бұрын
@@zorawarsingh6795 Instead of Wizard, I'd argue Artificer (Alchemist) given Geralt's ability to brew potions. This also gives you the signs (cantrips) and you can use the infusions for Witcher's Sight (Goggles of Night) and improved armor and weapon. Be sure, of course, to take the Crossbow Expert and Tough feats.
@Drocksas4 жыл бұрын
@@zorawarsingh6795 I actually totally see ranger. After all, a ranger doesn't just have to fight with a bow; they do have some spells (that I regret to say I haven't tried but wish to) that make melee combat more interesting, as I recall. You could argue for a bit of battlemaster fighter, or alchemist artificer, but as far as "know your enemy," it's hard to hit that witcher archetype any more on the dot than a ranger's favored enemy
@darksev.64684 жыл бұрын
I think he's more of a Mutant Blood Hunter. The subclass was literally based on him.
@johnstarinieri73604 жыл бұрын
He’s a Blood Hunter. Literally a Blood Hunter. The class was based after The Witcher and Bloodborne.
@APmime4 жыл бұрын
Another media figure that one could argue is a proper DnD Ranger: Crocodile Dundee
@cassandramuller73374 жыл бұрын
"You can live on it but it tastes like shit" best quote in the movie
@EIixir4 жыл бұрын
The more I think about this the more I like it.
@nickstefanwhite88654 жыл бұрын
Aren't Sam and Dean Winchester Rangers? I watched the first four seasons of Supernatural. But maybe the are more like clerics that dispel evil? And in the show 'Grimm' Portland detective Nick Burkhardt is a "grimm" which is like a modern ranger. Aragorn. The Mandalorian. Drizzt. Taran from Prydain Chronicles. Kaladin in 'the way of kings'.
@evantiel7274 жыл бұрын
Actually... yea hes the perfect ranger the more i think about it 🤔
@dehro4 жыл бұрын
his favourite enemy are uppity city folk
@jedh37213 жыл бұрын
"Aragorn displays all the qualities of a D&D ranger to a T" Wow. It's almost like D&D based the Ranger class off of some monolithic piece of fiction that has borderline defined modern fantasy books and invented several races and ideas.
@sststr2 жыл бұрын
Quite the contrary, Gygax was not a fan of LOTR, and if you read interviews with him he freely says as much. Or look at his lists of suggested reading (like in the 1st ed AD&D DMG), you won't Tolkien on the list. Now it does seem inevitable that at least some Tolkien influence crept in to the original versions of the game (Gygax had at least read the LOTR books, even if he wasn't impressed by them), but it wasn't an intentional or conscious effort on Gygax's part.
@jedh37212 жыл бұрын
@@sststr nothing you just said contradicted my statement.
@Fuckyoubloodymoron2 жыл бұрын
@@sststr Then maybe Gygax could've tried coming up with something more original than Elves, Dwarves and -Hobbits- Halflings.
@sststr2 жыл бұрын
Elves, dwarves and gnomes are staples of ancient folklore traditions, as are goblins, bugbears, etc. Halflings are one thing he did unquestionably take from Tolkien, as he actually called them hobbits in the earliest editions, and got into legal trouble with Tolkien's estate for doing so. No doubt the legal tussle only soured Gygax on Tolkien further than whatever mild disinterest he may have had prior to it, and encouraged him to distance his product all the more from anything to do with the Tolkien legendarium.
@Lichelf2 жыл бұрын
@@sststr D&D elves and dwarves are clearly inspired by the Tolkien version of those races. They used to be very different until Tokien wrote his own version. For not to mention that it was Tolkien who changed the word "dwarfs" to "dwarves" in popular culture/fantasy. His version of those races simply is THAT ingrained in the genre.
@Zedrinbot4 жыл бұрын
I never understood why people thought rangers didn't have a place in fantasy. They're kinda everywhere in fantasy video games. Maybe it's just cause in TTRPG history ranger used to be a variant of fighter, back when there were only like 4 classes? While gloomstalker and horizon walker are great, the issue I have is they don't fix the problems with rangers, they more circumvent them. I don't like the idea of patching up a weak class with a strong subclass--it makes the other options feel neglected, and also can cause a problem with munchkins (see: hexblades as well). Hence, I'm really happy with TCE actually introducing options that apply to ALL subclasses (and had alternate options for beastmaster to make em more competitive). Favored Foe is great, and I love the favored terrain replacements, though part of me feels like it should've been an addition, not a replacement. I hope WotC is more willing to do more variant class options in the future instead of relying just on subclasses. Let the subclasses stay focused on being unique instead of being straight upgrades over the base options.
@dasvinnifala4 жыл бұрын
I just wish the CHA to attack and damage rools was a pact of the blade boon feture than Hexblade exclusive. It would requirea higher investment in the class to acquire that and also make blade pact viable with other patrons
@ChairmanLevi4 жыл бұрын
Favored foe is bad because it eats concentration
@Kingdomkey1236784 жыл бұрын
Well favored foe would be great if it didn’t require concentration and only applied on one attack
@Snyperwolf914 жыл бұрын
I would say that the ranger was before 5e be more the long range fighter in that case . But since the warrior has the ability to use bow and arrow too that killed the ranger in 5e. Multiclassing can solve the rangers problem but solo classing needs some homebrewed improvements. Even with the Xanathars guide subclasses the rangers seems still so uninteresting .
@bennettanderson98394 жыл бұрын
Great opinion, but Zedrin, you have even greater art
@TwoGnomes4 жыл бұрын
He wasn’t even taped to the ceiling
@asgrahim91644 жыл бұрын
My disappointment is immeasurable, and my day is ruined.
@finderfinder42904 жыл бұрын
smh my head
@feedbacking63064 жыл бұрын
He should tape himself upside down to the wall after that, he’ll look like even more of a tomato.
@thelosingteam10984 жыл бұрын
If some Rangers can turn invisible while in nature, would that make the Predator a Ranger? 🤔
@johnowen93494 жыл бұрын
That's not the only thing that makes the Predator a Ranger. I would add in a couple of levels of Dread Commando in 3.x too.
@cloak58574 жыл бұрын
Predator is clearly a monster but I'm sure there's a homebrew Predator PC race out there somewhere.
@EricIsntSmart3 жыл бұрын
Yeah, predators would be a mix of fighter and ranger, maybe a bit artificer
@ssgoko883 жыл бұрын
@@EricIsntSmart nah I think they just have a generous dm
@lwriker13043 жыл бұрын
Since all Preditors must prove themselves, would they all be ranger multiclass with something else? Kind of like all Klingons are fighters multiclass with scientist, politition, strategist.
@totallyrealname63764 жыл бұрын
"Rangers have no place in fantasy" who the what when was this ever said lmao I've only ever heard of rangers IN fantasy. Where else y'all hearing about rangers from?
@monhunterz54304 жыл бұрын
Parks of course, have to keep Yogi Bear in line
@Gyallarhorn14 жыл бұрын
@@monhunterz5430 Texas. Even Chuck Norris was a ranger.
@fidly44 жыл бұрын
Power Rangers
@noraarcadia6354 жыл бұрын
Fallout?
@kurroshin7504 жыл бұрын
Army rangers?
@emsilly7414 жыл бұрын
Mando is a ranger in a sci-fi setting, of course he has gadgets. It's like a D&D ranger buying rope and 10' poles and ball bearings
@TheSamba374 жыл бұрын
The gadgets are just reskinned ranger spells.
@DoctorLazers4 жыл бұрын
By extension, Boba and Jango are also Rangers.
@TheSamba374 жыл бұрын
@@DoctorLazers I would say Boba is a Vengeance paladin/ranger multiclass. That could change with the upcoming series though.
@DoctorLazers4 жыл бұрын
@@TheSamba37 I dunno. Paladin is a pretty specific archetype. I think Jedi are definitely the Star Wars equivalent (lore-wise, moreso than gameplay, but everything can'tbe 1 to 1), heroic magical Knights protecting the good and right with a code of honour and such. If you actually look at the Star Wars d20 RPG, the bounty hunter class is an extension of the scout, which is the parallel to Rangers.
@hawkmithra98794 жыл бұрын
@@DoctorLazers jedi are sorcerers
@thothrax56214 жыл бұрын
I'd actually provide two additional examples of rangers: Geralt (as you kinda alluded to) as he's all about knowing the enemy, basic magic, and hunting stuff down, all the bonus stuff about Witchers is basically just background/race; and the other example isn't fantasy based, but Steve Irwin could be an interesting model for a ranger, he wasn't a hippie like a druid might be, but rather just loved and was at home with nature, he was very knowledgeable about the stuff and the dude could 100% cast Speak with Animals, you could even mix him with a bit of Bear Grylls for a real fun and interesting Ranger design.
@dsoul13054 жыл бұрын
Yes, I thought about Geralt. He at least talks with the horse, lol.
@jeffm97704 жыл бұрын
Yep, if you're only counting official classes Geralt is a Monster Slayer ranger. If you're counting Blood Hunter he's an Order of the Mutant Blood Hunter
@darthfenrir77733 жыл бұрын
"...Steve Irwin could be an interesting model for a ranger," Never have I needed something so badly and not known until I received it.
@Taako_Tuesday3 жыл бұрын
Is Westley from princess bride a ranger? He tracks Vizini and Buttercup after climbing the cliffs of insanity with some pretty good nature skills. He navigates the fire swamp and deals with the ROUSs. Of course, he can fight, and his intellect is shown in his forethought and deception in the battle of wits, not to mention the holocaust cloak strategy and getting Prince Humperdinck not to attack him. He doesn't use a bow, but then again neither does Aragorn.
@thothrax56213 жыл бұрын
@@Taako_Tuesday I think he's more of a Rogue with a bit of a mix between the Scout and Swashbuckler archetypes
@5Dworld4 жыл бұрын
Faramir (Captain of the Rangers of Ithilien) - "Am I a joke to you??"
@sassysauron24264 жыл бұрын
Denethor: Yes.
@MetaMagix4 жыл бұрын
"If I'm wrong at least you can gain some entertainment from my failures." Never change Jacob.... Also I'm stealing that slogan
@peterniles89843 жыл бұрын
Lord of the Rings was one of the books that *invented* fantasy as the genre we know it as today, and the legacy of rangers in fantasy is huge. Rangers belong in fantasy more than artificers, IMO, and especially given the Drizzt exists as a character
@arnijulian62414 жыл бұрын
The predator is definitely a beefy ranger/artificer.
@kedabro19574 жыл бұрын
Oh god that is perfect. How did I not see this?
@jamescarter79864 жыл бұрын
Again probably just Ranger as like the Mandalorian he doesn't make his weapons.
@kwh11424 жыл бұрын
So you watch Toluk the Barbarian???
@yanderenejoyer4 жыл бұрын
@@jamescarter7986 Actually, no. We don't really know if they can't make their own weapons. Maybe since the tech on earth is garbage, they can't make their gear there. Also, Artíficer (Artilerist) literally gives you a shoulder cannon. Can't pass that up.
@cdgonepotatoes42194 жыл бұрын
@@yanderenejoyer the predators seen in the movies and comics all (or almost, didn't look that deep into it) are recreational hunters, and not all hunters are fletchers/gunsmiths.
@tjardhamming4414 жыл бұрын
6:18 is where Aragorn took his first level in Barbarian
@knavic4 жыл бұрын
He actually breaks his toe in this scene.
@Crossark14 жыл бұрын
I would argue that reading the “The Ranger’s Apprentice” series as a kid helped me understand the D&D 5e ranger role way more than the Player’s Handbook ever did, and that series came out back in 4e when rangers weren’t nerfed to hell and back. The issue with them in 5e, imo, is that it’s not a class - it’s a character archetype. You’re effectively typecast into a certain, constrained naturalist role, whereas other classes have room to be multifaceted and can easily spec into abilities/subclasses that do what you do. That means the ranger player either never gets to really use their role because someone else beats them to it/doesn’t need to ask them for help, or the other players have to leave character traits out of their characters because they might step on the only things that give the ranger a place in the party. They don’t give you much choice as a ranger than to be an at least mostly-serious hunter-tracker type, as opposed to other classes who can be sorta whoever they want to be and just fight in a certain way. There can be some wiggle-room in that department with firearms, and if you homebrew in some rules that give them more useful traps and proficiency with improvised weaponry, though. I’d say a ranger is best suited for small groups, where ability overlap is limited and they can be turned to more often. As a class whose roleplaying potential is *strongly* linked with its unique mechanics, you need opportunities to use those mechanics if you want to have a happy player.
@speedlarcool1324 жыл бұрын
I had some idea for some variant ranger: Bounty Hunter, police officer, guards, spy and researcher. All of these can play in the trope of being a ranger if you flavour the class a little bit. You don’t always has to be a protector of nature.
@elytraman18094 жыл бұрын
dude i choose ranger in my first ever session, gotta get that halt/will going.
@brandondennis51664 жыл бұрын
Whoa, you just sent me back a long while.
@katiegrayx36374 жыл бұрын
THIS SERIES IS SO GOOD IM NOT ALONE!
@lenodas35673 жыл бұрын
I loved that series too!
@verumnosgrohiik9264 жыл бұрын
Y'know, I would've said there's three examples of rangers in media. Aragorn, Mando, and Geralt of Rivia. The ENTIRE point of the Witcher series when it comes to monster hunting is all about learning what the monster is you need to hunt, consulting what you know about them in order to more easily counter them, and then using your skills with weaponry combined with some limited magical powers in order to overcome them.
@nickstefanwhite88654 жыл бұрын
Wouldn't that make Sam and Dean Winchester Rangers? I watched the first four seasons of Supernatural. But maybe the are more like clerics that dispel evil?
@nickstefanwhite88654 жыл бұрын
And in the show 'Grimm' Portland detective Nick Burkhardt is a "grimm" which is like a modern ranger.
@PaigeDyerASMR4 жыл бұрын
Nick Stefan White there's a homebrew "hunter" class that a player of mine played once. It mostly followed in the footsteps of ranger with a little monk and some modern flavor
@ihavealifeyaknow68274 жыл бұрын
Here I am, the idiot, thinking he was going to mention Drizzt.
@bskec21774 жыл бұрын
He did say pop culture, and Drizzt is more classical. Also, pointing to a D&D character for pop culture exampled of D&D characters is more than a little circular. It would be like if someone in Critical Role played Ranger, and Jacob pointed to that.
@EzekiesAcheron4 жыл бұрын
Ikr
@DrPluton4 жыл бұрын
Drizzt has more levels of fighter than he does ranger. As of 3rd edition, he was Fighter 10/Barbarian 1/Ranger 5.
@ihil46204 жыл бұрын
Drizzt's cool
@darkeather24 жыл бұрын
@@DrPluton Ah yes, the 1 level in barbarian. Always a favorite
@Athala014 жыл бұрын
My only issue is with rangers is that they gave Arcane Archer to fighters as a subclass >(.
@wanderer2024 жыл бұрын
This is true, but you can at least be confident in the knowledge that it's the worst subclass of fighter. Two uses of arcane shot? Really? Just two no matter what level you are? Level 7 feature is completely dependent on the feature you can only use twice? And they don't damage scale until a level most campaigns won't ever reach? Really? A champion is a better archer than arcane archer... at least they can crit fish and are probably going to do some real damage throughout the entire fight. Ranger, without any Tasha revisions, is pretty universally better at firing magical arrows via its spell slots (which is probably why they gave the subclass to Fighter in the first place) than Arcane Archer, a subclass dedicated to firing magical arrows.
@laughingkidd8154 жыл бұрын
Yeah but rangers have many spells that are literally just magic arrows. Also arcane archer is so underwhelming lol
@panwall13273 жыл бұрын
And its not even a good subclass...
@gavinlopez62583 жыл бұрын
@@wanderer202 what about Purple Dragon Knight? That's way worse
@JacksonOwex3 жыл бұрын
Right!!! WTF WOTC?!
@ticonofruger5734 жыл бұрын
"You can't convince me Mando ain't a ranger." - Jacob 2020
@paulburris52164 жыл бұрын
...but he's a paladin.
@tal47264 жыл бұрын
"Stubs his toe" Dude, Viggo BROKE his toe in that take.
@WTFisTingispingis4 жыл бұрын
He didn't even break character, that scream was him going "OW THAT FUCKING HURTS" and they thought it was perfect.
@vahlok14264 жыл бұрын
He turned a self inflicted injury into an in character breakdown. Turned his scream of pain into one of anguish over their perceived loss of the hobbits. What a legend.
@jake514794 жыл бұрын
it was obviously a joke
@squattingheads4 жыл бұрын
We ALL know!!!
@thedutchie944 жыл бұрын
The Joke -- Your head
@ljskizzle4 жыл бұрын
The Rangers Apprentice books were my favorite growing up, I made my mom sew me a cloak and I would go out in the woods and pretend to be hiding from enemies.
@mushroom_gal4904 жыл бұрын
YES! I love those books. Such a good representation of what that kind of character in a fantasy setting could be. They didn't even need magic to be deadly and feared by basically everyone, they were just that good at what they did. And not even all of them were just bow-wielding steath fetishists, some of them also had some serious close combat skills! Take notes, fantasy media
@Memelord-md5hs2 жыл бұрын
I loved those books! I read all the way to book 10 and loved how much of a survivalist will was and its a book series with female characters who pull their weight, have agency and are badasses just like their male allies Also yeah I wanted a cloak like will so I could run around the yard with my like $2.99 plastic bow with plunger head arrows that didn't stick or fire well
@AlyssMa7rin2 жыл бұрын
Greybeard Halt's a friend of mine, I've heard common talk!
@solitariuslupus1195 Жыл бұрын
My first D&D character, who I'm still playing today, is a ranger rogue multi class that is basically exactly like Halt. Or at least he was until recent story beats have taken him down a very unexpected route
@AlyssMa7rin Жыл бұрын
@@solitariuslupus1195 he got reincarnated into a new body didn’t he
@alakazavartin4 жыл бұрын
I feel like most of the ideas in Arcane Archer should've been integrated into Ranger.
@leahbeah15854 жыл бұрын
Yes I totally agree, maybe change it so you craft special arrows with elven runes or something since that fits better with ranger.
@alakazavartin4 жыл бұрын
@@leahbeah1585 Maybe generalize it to work with melee attacks, and apply it to the base Ranger rather than creating an entirely new subclass.
@andrefelipe78654 жыл бұрын
Maybe, but this would make the Ranger almost exclusively a bow class, and do do believe that there's space for dual wield and sword and shield (Aragorn even used sword and shield AND two handed swords)
@alakazavartin4 жыл бұрын
@@andrefelipe7865 What I meant was to basically turn the Arcane Shots into Arcane Attacks, so it could work with both melee and ranged weapon attacks. Maybe call them Primal/Arcane Strikes?
@just-a-purple-ork4 жыл бұрын
It should have been a ranger subclass tbh
@kristenladue13954 жыл бұрын
I would also like to mention another fictional ranger representation. June from Avatar the Last Airbender. She was a bounty hunter with an animal companion who tracks people.
@RJ_Ehlert4 жыл бұрын
If anyone wants some comedy, "DM of the Rings" is one of the funniest webcomics I ever read. The basic premise is that someone has a group of players who never heard of Lord of the Rings and the DM runs them in the by-the-book campaign.
@htoad3604 жыл бұрын
alsocheckoutorderofthestick
@EG-cm5th3 жыл бұрын
There's also a webcomic that was inspired by DM of the Rings, called Darths and Droids, which is based on star wars, but instead of being about the DM railroading the players like in DMOTR, it's focused around the players hijacking the DM's story and forcing him to work around their randomness. :P
@mr.potato22233 жыл бұрын
GO TO MORIA DAMMIT
@Ninjamanhammer3 жыл бұрын
I think it's meant to be in a parallel universe where Lord of the Rings never existed.
@jacobsermersheim67583 жыл бұрын
Where can I find it?
@dunedain34254 жыл бұрын
Aragorn, Geralt of Rivia, Daryl Dixon, Boba Fett, Van Helsing, Owen Grady, Katniss Everdeen, John Rambo, Robin Hood, the man with no name, Shaggy and Scooby doo....
@JustBenUnofficial4 жыл бұрын
Lan Mandragoran?
@mr.viewer39064 жыл бұрын
Faramir...?
@theprinceofawesomeness4 жыл бұрын
@@mr.viewer3906 finally. Someone said his name
@arettbarnard78324 жыл бұрын
@@JustBenUnofficial I think there could e a pretty healty dbate as to whether the true blade of malkier is a ranger or fighter (especially considering he's a swordmaster and taught the ta'veren from the two rivers mostly about weapons IIRC)
@JustBenUnofficial4 жыл бұрын
@@arettbarnard7832 But can a ranger not be a great swordsman? If not the best in the world? He also does "pass without a trace" quite frequently. I'm honestly just happy to talk about WoT!
@benfisher26724 жыл бұрын
You could say Rangers have a “Range” of abilities. Ok I’ll go now.
@redwolf62134 жыл бұрын
No thats a perfect definition! Don't shame your self for your big brain.
@imanard35934 жыл бұрын
don’t worry, humans are my favorite enemy
@vernonhampton58634 жыл бұрын
... the door is where you found it.
@benfisher26724 жыл бұрын
Dang this comment almost had three hundred likes. Didn’t think people would like something so dumb.
@radovanmarcincin25024 жыл бұрын
thank you sir for your contribution to comment section, i love it
@thecinemascribe4 жыл бұрын
Aloy from Horizon Zero Dawn is literally such a Ranger and I need more people to acknowledge this
@ianbailey42134 жыл бұрын
Oh gosh you're right.
@gamercore52164 жыл бұрын
Ey another HZD fan
@strwrbttlfrnt4 жыл бұрын
Yep
@squidlytv4 жыл бұрын
I cant get into that game.
@Tijnob4 жыл бұрын
i am glad im not the only one
@supertails90004 жыл бұрын
My group’s ranger is the only reason we’re still alive today Edit: He betrayed us later
@WarpigPSU4 жыл бұрын
Yeah, we have a ranger (hunter). He routinely does the most damage in combat and has all sorts of great abilities for out of combat (sometimes to the point of annoying me...I leave a hint that they are approaching a dragon layer and he immediately does his little trick to _know_ that there is a dragon nearby, for example).
@bryanmerel4 жыл бұрын
@@WarpigPSU can we also talk how Rangers if built properly, can almost always hit enemies with their insane dice rolls?
@mrosskne4 жыл бұрын
no competent full casters huh?
@sirbraveheart65354 жыл бұрын
I haven't actually watched the Matt Colville video but I do love watching The Lord of the Rings and picking out all the individual moments where one of the characters fails an ability check or saving throw. Basically every large action sequence is full of moments that could have happened in a d&d game. Legolas: "I want to surf down the stairs on a shield" DM: "Roll acrobatics with disadvantage" Legolas: "I got two natural 20's"
@EzekiesAcheron4 жыл бұрын
Hahahahahahaha
@pandacakes66134 жыл бұрын
It's a good vid IMO. His criticism is more so that the story structure of LOTR wouldn't make for a super fun dnd game since it would be quite a railroad.
@Mirekluk4 жыл бұрын
@@pandacakes6613 It's not even criticism really. It's just taking the story in different context and showing two opposing mindsets for D&D.
@pandacakes66134 жыл бұрын
@@Mirekluk I agree with your comment. But I believe I remember him saying something about The Hobbit being more akin to dnd than LOTR is in the comment section of that video but fair enough you're correct.
@lifetake31034 жыл бұрын
I'm just here to say the format of this video was great and I really appreciated it. The title screens and photo/video clips to back your point really helped bring things to focus better than say your lay on the floor rants. Overall great video. Also rangers cool
@ukotoa16394 жыл бұрын
OH MY GOD THANK YOU! Jacob your my hero! I love Ranger it’s my first and favourite class (warlock a close second) a Ranger is such a fun class, and I love the versatility outside of combat, and my girl Vex proves that they can be awesome.
@CooperAATE4 жыл бұрын
You're*
@JT_Lich4 жыл бұрын
Off in the distance..... Marisha Ray: *uk'otoa........*
@christofferhougaard4 жыл бұрын
Oh have ya tried a warlock ranger. Focusing more on charisma than wisdom. So ya only need 14+ charisma and then flavoring stuff with warlock. I have an idea for a warlock ranger that uses their tome to write down information about the monsters they've encountered.
@thewonderfullymadejaraid70154 жыл бұрын
What made this video especially good was the background music from the greatest ranger of them all: The Gravewalker. It's little wonder this video wasn't monetized.
@Mosamania4 жыл бұрын
In more than one occasion Laura was dissatisfied with her class choice, that is why Matt gave her a lot more layaway to optimize her class and buff up her character and animal companion through other means so she can keep up with the rest of the party. Doing doing 13 damage a round next to a rouge and Barbadian didn’t help at all either.
@matheusfili4 жыл бұрын
My favorite Ranger on popculture is Will Treaty from Ranger’s Apprentice book series, I believe that this book series really cover up well what a Ranger is and show them in a really good light, or in shadow since they are stealthy, I really wanted to try to make a Ranger based on him on a D&D campaign, but oh god it is hard due to how weak the class is.
@relic97263 жыл бұрын
I just play a rogue for Halt with expertise in stealth and perception
@PartialDemon4 жыл бұрын
One could argue that Riddick from "Chronicles of Riddick" is a Gloomstalker Ranger. I mean he has umbral sight, iron mind, dread ambusher, stalkers furry, and shadowy dodge. He's also a pretty good survivalist in every situation, oh and he speaks with animals too.
@foxknight92404 жыл бұрын
There is also the “rangers apprentice” books (no magic) but they are fairly close to dnd rangers
@sploofmcsterra47864 жыл бұрын
Those rangers are op af
@johnowen93494 жыл бұрын
Non-magical rangers, trades out spells for four additional feats at the levels when you would have gotten a spell level. From the Rokugan setting book.
@coolghoul85153 жыл бұрын
they're actually a subclass that have a special ability, whenever coffee is prepared within 10ft of them the recipe and taste must be described in 2 paragraphs of detail
@primedog1003 жыл бұрын
@@coolghoul8515 but did the coffee have honey in it or not?
@coolghoul85153 жыл бұрын
@@primedog100 do you really have to ask?
@arunoc72084 жыл бұрын
Tasha's was an actual blessing to Ranger. I loved the class before, but strayed away because it was weak, but now it can stand up to the other classes!
@Sugugus_4213 жыл бұрын
6:20 "DID YOU KNOW THAT IN THIS SCENE VIGGO ACTUALLY BRO-"
@djsalad57524 жыл бұрын
“I’m Elon Musk of bad ideas”
@gamertwo62634 жыл бұрын
So just elon musk
@gearfifth9564 жыл бұрын
?
@gamingman27204 жыл бұрын
-Michael Reeves
@exonism85224 жыл бұрын
You missed a "the" in that quote.
@Humble1974 жыл бұрын
@@gamertwo6263 2nd richest man in the world is an idiot k mate.
@WillcraftAnimations4 жыл бұрын
I don't see why anyone would say that rangers don't belong in fantasy (I would personally say that title falls to the bard, but let's not get into that today). My complaint has always been that rangers in D&D aren't what they should be. They should be survivalists that keep the party from getting lost or perishing in the wilderness, and in urban environments still serving as the fantasy equivalent of detectives, as well as making up for what they lack in physical prowess with their knowledge of their opponents, utilizing traps, the terrain and weaknesses to take down their foes. Meanwhile, D&D rangers are just fighter-rogue-druids. Unearthed Arcana is considered to have fixed them, but all it did was make them BETTER fighter-rogue druids. The Xanathar subclasses helped, but while the meat of the class was improved by that, the skeleton remains just as flawed. I really like the concept of rangers, in fact out of all non-mage fantasy classes they're probably my favourite, and that's why I wish that what makes them distinct and interesting was better represented in D&D. Stuff like actually making them snowballs by letting them gain an incremental bonus against certain enemies the more they fight them (Say, I don't know, after fighting four trolls you gain a +1 to hit against all trolls, after fighting ten trolls you gain a +1 to damage rolls against them, and so on). Because, like, I enjoy the IDEA of Favoured Enemy and Favoured Terrain, but the fact of the matter is that they are useless throughout most of the game and just letting the ranger switch them out at will would be overpowered, so having some manner of learning system where they gain favour with certain enemies or terrain types the more they gain experience with them would be an interesting mechanic. A wee bit too complicated for something like 5E perhaps, and that's part of the problem as I see it. In fact, I find that the design of the game itself actively works against rangers. For instance, there really aren't a lot of mechanics in place that makes the wilderness all too dangerous. Weather, terrain, disorientation, sickness, starvation, these are all things that most hapless adventurers would fall victim to in normal circumstances, but in D&D the only commonly used rule is difficult terrain. Which is annoying more than anything. The sheer difficulty of integrating survival elements into the game, even with homebrewing, is infamous. Really the biggest threat while wandering the wilds is random encounters, and that's where pretty much every other class shines. The rules that would benefit rangers simply aren't in the vanilla game, and so there isn't much to build the class around. As an aside, I also don't like the idea of them having magic. This is way more down to personal preference than anything mentioned above, but I think they work significantly better when it's just a matter of raw skill and knowledge. You don't need Speak With Animals when you have a high Animal Handling skill, you're just able to read the animals' behaviour and know what they're responsive to. You don't need healing spells when you have vast knowledge of healing herbs, natural afflictions and field medicine. But that's not so much a criticism of rangers as it is of D&D itself (again), as magic is something so common that nearly every class either has it or CAN have it through subclasses, and even if not, you got feats and other means of stumbling over it. I actually have a theory that even in D&D, rangers aren't supposed to know spells. Their "spells" are in fact intended to just be regular, nonmagical abilities, but because the system isn't designed to accommodate that, it would make for one daunting list of abilities to keep track of. So instead they just turned the excessive stuff into a spell list, which is largely considered much more manageable. I can't prove that, I just have a hunch. The idea of each class having a list of abilities to choose from upon levelup, kinda like the warlock's Eldritch Invocations, always appealed to me more than the rather lackluster arsenal of most non-mage classes (*COUGH* barbarians). But that would require a chunky overhaul of how classes work, since everything being passive or having a rest-based cooldown would get overwhelming fast. I guess I can't blame anyone for not wanting to do that, with the risk of it becoming overly complicated or at least alienating old D&D players. TL;DR: I really like rangers in concept, but I continue to dislike their portrayal in D&D. And I think it's largely the fault of the game itself just not being designed for them. Just like you could argue that the stealth mechanics are severely lacking, and rogues manage to skirt by because of Sneak Attack and how it's near-impossible to hit them. With sufficient homebrew they could be fun, but at that point it's not the game's doing but your own. So I think the ranger is just a prime example of 5E's "streamlined" philosophy (and neglect of noncombat features) biting it in the rear.
@interdimensionalgoober87694 жыл бұрын
Bards make sense, musicians existed around that time in medieval Europe if you go by fantasy trope rules, and they don’t even have to be musicians, they’re just entertainers. If you were to go by fantasy trope rules monks don’t make sense. Sorry for getting into that today, don’t overthink this comment, it’s just my opinion.
@eintorpid91014 жыл бұрын
@@interdimensionalgoober8769 Monks are really supposed to replicate martial artists like shaolin monks and not the western ones. They're the fist-fighty characters you see in some fantasy.
@interdimensionalgoober87694 жыл бұрын
@@eintorpid9101 I get what they are, I never said otherwise, their origin is exactly why they don’t make sense in a medieval Europe (at least in my opinion). Shaolin monks make less sense around wizards and clerics than medieval tropes, because monks aren’t really medieval tropes.
@ExeErdna4 жыл бұрын
personally favored enemy/terrain should be adjustable per long rest like if you're stuck in a city for a few days/weeks/months etc that forest specialist isn't gonna be a dumbass and never adapt he's gonna be better at killing people and understand urban environments a lot better. Yet each adjustment is based on exposure and takes that long rest. But yeah 5e is too streamlined so too many "prep time" type skills that pretty much a lot of classes CAN use yet it gets yeeted out the window for a kinda slow combat because people didn't prepare. I like rogues with all the flavor they got over the years the Thief is still the best one due to all its early skills never drop off. Or they shouldn't drop off. To me, a Mastermind is freaking busted with the right setup yet too many campaigns aren't suited for a prep-time character making schemes via observation. Like Rangers should be learning the land and getting better within it. Like drawing pursuers into traps like Rambo is a Ranger job, higher stealth like a rogue and or even helping the party in such ambushes. Even Druids get kinda pigeon-holed into magic barbarians. Wild Shape, maul things to death, never die, avoid psychic shit, repeat. 5e has a lot of problems thinking about it...
@kota864 жыл бұрын
You just gave me a ton of great ideas. Thank you!
@MultiCommissar4 жыл бұрын
A good fix to favored enemy would be to make Rangers be able to once a week "research" a specific enemy type and gain bonuses against them until a different enemy type is chosen.
@invinciblecarrot9564 жыл бұрын
honestly the pop culture comparisons really help your points in this video. also, you made me wanna watch lord of the rings again
@Sn8kezz4 жыл бұрын
Talion from Shadow of Mordor/War is also a ranger. I mean, he's literally called the Ranger all the time.
@dusktomidnight72074 жыл бұрын
That game is so much fun
@pandacakes66134 жыл бұрын
He'd probably be a bit multiclassed though with the ability to dominate orcs.
@XPtoLevel34 жыл бұрын
I included music from the game in most of this video lol Those are some of my favorite games
@PrestonWillis4 жыл бұрын
MANSWINE!!!
@hanaisphani99944 жыл бұрын
I made him as a PC once, I actually went with Blood Hunter Order of the Profane Soul and had an undying patron to represent Celebrimbor
@dasht19174 жыл бұрын
As a Ranger main, we needed this
@leosakata11654 жыл бұрын
You also kind of said it, but Geralt is another perfect example of a ranger, he tracks, has a ton of knowledge of (every) favoured enemy, can use a bit of magic and I'll be damned if he can't speak with Roache while NOT on drugs
@MultiCommissar4 жыл бұрын
Yes, but his bit of magic is actually focused and powerful, instead of the tiny hedge magic Rangers have.
@apainintheaas4 жыл бұрын
The beast master is an absolute trap. It sound so cool and cute, your own pet wolf. Fits great flavour wise. For someone who doesn't know the fine details of the game it looks really tempting only to be a huge let down in practice
@luketfer4 жыл бұрын
Thankfully with the new Beast of Air/Land/Sea...it's actually nowhere NEAR as much of a trap as it was. Firstly the pet now takes your Bonus action to attack, secondly, they actually scale MUCH better into late game unlike the normal beast Master pets which barely scale. The funny thing was, when DnDNext (as 5e was called during playtesting) they initially went with the options listed in Tasha's (a set of statblocks that could be reflavored to any animal and scaled better) but the old Grognards that hated change wanted to be able to pick their creature...and what we got was the PHB version of Beastmaster.
@WillowGreenheart4 жыл бұрын
@@luketfer Yea. My wife is playing BM and i let her change features to new BM and it's good. Not awesome/omg/OP good like new meta sorcerer build but it's fun and not useless !
@Papa_Mike4 жыл бұрын
Read this and thought you meant the old movie. Then I thought, there's another Ranger!
@kanga24684 жыл бұрын
Xp: "There are only two rangers in pop culture" The Witcher: "Am I a joke to you?"
@kedabro19574 жыл бұрын
Not to mention the OG: ROBIN HOOD?
@dren58104 жыл бұрын
@@kedabro1957 ehh I think Robin hood is more of a rogue with a possible dip into bard.
@elf-lordsfriarofthemeadowl20394 жыл бұрын
@@dren5810 are you being serious? Nothing about his skill repertoire includes Sneak attacks (beyond ambushes), thieves' cant, casting spells, creating mystical poetry or tracking down enemies like a Ranger. He's just a fighter that lives in the woods with friends.
@dren58104 жыл бұрын
@@elf-lordsfriarofthemeadowl2039 I should have clarified. When I liken Robin hood to rogue and bard im thinking of those archetypes in literature not mechanics. In literature rogues are not all edgy stabby people but more street smart, charismatic and always have the right tool for the job.
@zenraloc4 жыл бұрын
Geralt is a blood hunter
@jeremyknick12644 жыл бұрын
I once DM'ed a campaign that took place in the underdark and for once I thought huh Gloom stalker Ranger is actually REALLY good
@Distain_Gaming4 жыл бұрын
I'd just like to note Ranger does a real good job of doubling as a mechanical backbone for a fantasy hard-boiled detective.
@mango45542 жыл бұрын
I prefer rogue for that sort've thing but now that you mention it I might try ranger
@idontknow-mf4bp2 жыл бұрын
Thats why i wish there was an urban ranger kind of option
@funnyvalentinedidnothingwrong2 жыл бұрын
@@idontknow-mf4bp Hunter Ranger's pretty solid if you're working a bounty hunter kinda vibe.
@darkj3di6662 жыл бұрын
@@idontknow-mf4bp on Pathfinder there are many, many subclasses for each main classes: for ranger, one potential subclass is "espionage expert", a ranger with heavy emphasis on urban environment
@nazek4216 Жыл бұрын
@@darkj3di666Better yet, Pathfinder 2e has the Investigator, which is a whole class focused around being a detective
@naomiskilling10934 жыл бұрын
Is Geralt not also a ranger? He's specifically a monster hunter.
@zanethethiccboi10204 жыл бұрын
I agree, Monster Hunter subclass suits him really well (unless you allow blood hunter, then he’s one of them, but base game only yes Geralt is absolutely a ranger)
@Ashley-of6ro4 жыл бұрын
Its funny bc he literally mentions Geralt later when talking about monster hunter. Though im sure if he did mention it, people would be shouting "BLOOD HUNTER!!!" from the hills
@JacksonOwex3 жыл бұрын
@@Ashley-of6ro BLOOD HUNTER!!!!(I am absolutely on the hills, you can't see so SHUT UP lol)
@theinfiniteking4 жыл бұрын
XP: "Sorry this video was a little short" You're talking to a guy who mainly watches your 4 minute shorts.
@marine25504 жыл бұрын
The love towards us dedicated rangers is felt my dude. Much love
@JT_Lich4 жыл бұрын
Easy way to fix ranger: either use Revised Ranger, or use Tasha's alternate class features
@danielcompton93184 жыл бұрын
I would like to make 2 points: 1) Every single comment stating how Viggo broke his toe in that scene exemplifies why people don’t like watching LoTR with us. 2) Mechanically Rangers have another problem in their spells and abilities with the lockup in concentration, but this can be easily solved with a little homebrew to put Ranger spells on the same level as others.
@luketfer4 жыл бұрын
This is also the one problem Tasha's did not fix. So many of the good Ranger spells are concentraction based when they should be able to be cast as an option to spend your reaction. Hail of Thorns, for example, really shouldn't be Concentraction or it should be that it's text reads, "As part of the spell, make a ranged attack..." or hell, give it to them as the ability to burn a spell slot like Paladin's with Divine Smite...
@TheRealWilliamWhite4 жыл бұрын
@@luketfer I think the main problem with the concentration spells that effect a weapon attack is that they don't want you to be able to stack them, Paladin Smite Spells work the same way. a better way would be to allow those to be a class feature like a mix betwen divine smites and arcane shot. Or just make hunters mark not require concentration.
@stenduginski23063 жыл бұрын
At 1:35, when you started the dramatic narration, it made me feel the calm happiness and excitement that washes over me when I'm starting a new campaign and the DM begins setting the scene :)
@STUV1014 жыл бұрын
8:40 When it comes to TCoE I would highly recommend reworking Favored Foe to work directly with Favored Enemy. As it currently works you have to use your concentration to get a d4, d6, or d8 extra damage to one creature. I would change it so that when you hit a Favored Enemy on each of your turns you can add a d4 damage (include later level/damage scaling), no concentration required. Why I recommend this change is that EVERY useful ranger spell in combat is concentration based, so you're locking out all your concentration spells just to get a d4, d6, or d8 extra damage (which btw you could just use hunter's mark to get a d6 at 2nd level where this would be doing a d4, both require concentration). You could also allow rangers to either choose two non-humanoid races or two humanoid races to have as favored enemies at 1st level.
@rehmanmir78654 жыл бұрын
Jacob... I already liked rangers despite not playing one but... this video is really good man holy cow. Something about the way it’s structured and delivered, you’ve really convinced me that Rangers are way cooler than I’ve given them credit for!!
@Flooshby72744 жыл бұрын
This video made me have another look at the class especially with the new TCoE options and im now in the midst of creating a Swarmkeeper ranger who's swarm is just a bunch of Ducklings. Great video.
@thanatos18834 жыл бұрын
I like how I'm watching for aragon then end up having flash backs to fighting graugs with Torvin in Shadow of Mordor
@noamtepper4564 жыл бұрын
You look so much more professional with glasses.
@coolio32674 жыл бұрын
Ikr
@zioqqr42624 жыл бұрын
He looks like hes tryna sell me lawnmower insurance
@Jane_83194 жыл бұрын
Everyone does
@coolboy99794 жыл бұрын
Everyone does, that is why I got glasses without lenses.
@noamtepper4564 жыл бұрын
@@coolboy9979 tried it once, didn’t work for me, I guess I’m spacial!
@thrawncaedusl7174 жыл бұрын
I would love a video series going through every class and naming well known representations of the class (or just videos about what class each character in a fantasy series are closest to, starting with LotR).
@AnyoneCanDM4 жыл бұрын
In reference to the second ranger in media “why would you say something so controversial, yet so brave”
@fishwad20774 жыл бұрын
"dying to every member of the chroma conclave you meet up with"
@Usagi333534 жыл бұрын
Rip Trinket. If only he got his time to shine
@mowzrascal23504 жыл бұрын
@@Usagi33353 spoilers yo wtff
@thundereagle974 жыл бұрын
@@mowzrascal2350 it's years old bro
@mowzrascal23504 жыл бұрын
@@thundereagle97 i know but i only started watching recently
@TonkarzOfSolSystem3 жыл бұрын
The ranger class was literally DnD's way of representing Aragorn in the game.
@sirstone45454 жыл бұрын
I may be a Paladin main, but I have all the respect in the world for Ranger mains.
@tjardhamming4414 жыл бұрын
It is mutual 🙏
@RoninCatholic4 жыл бұрын
Paladin, Ranger, and Bard is my ideal three-man party. Everyone can sword enemies to death, everyone can heal, everyone still has distinct niches built into his flavorful class.
@Shykar04 жыл бұрын
you know he is serious when he doesnt sit in a tub or lay on the ground.
@bardic8754 жыл бұрын
Great video! You and a couple other dnd youtubers actually inspired me to start making my own dnd video essays, and I actually talked about a lot of this stuff in my "In Defense of the Ranger" video!
@austinlapiere36474 жыл бұрын
Would geralt from witcher count as a good ranger?
@mateuss.98534 жыл бұрын
Yes, with the monster hunter subclass
@LupineShadowOmega4 жыл бұрын
@@Kython226 Homebrew is homebrew.
@thedutchie944 жыл бұрын
@@Kython226 Rangers can also have guilds. They're less stringent than paladins in that most dont ask for your life and make you recite the pledge of allegiance.
@ianbailey42134 жыл бұрын
Yeah he definitely fits a lot of the themes and trappings of rangers.
@austinlapiere36474 жыл бұрын
@@ianbailey4213 yeah that's what I thought. At least I thought of geralt immediately when someone talked about a ranger.
@fx2323 жыл бұрын
With Tasha's they fixed a lot of what was wrong with them, they felt underpowered before but now it's something that I'm actually excited to try instead of something I'd want to try eventually.
@sheppycider1234 жыл бұрын
6:20 Fun movie trivia, Aragorn’s actor actually broke his toe when he kicked the helmet during filming. The scream is very genuine.
@transcatgirl5513 жыл бұрын
My first character was a ranger. That campaign is still ongoing, and he is currently ranger monster hunter 8, fighter battle master 5, and warlock 1 with intent to go with that rest of the way.
@kiruslocke21194 жыл бұрын
The ranger class was literally based on Aragorn. That’s part of why I love them, but I agree that 5e was lackluster. Honestly 1st edition and AD&D are my favorite version of the ranger, but they are my also versions of the system so... take it with a Carthage of salt
@damiensteinrich96774 жыл бұрын
This may be my favorite video of yours. I like your comical but effective breakdown! As a pseudo newbie to D&D under a year, I need to expand my understanding of rangers and this helped.
@hourglasspop4 жыл бұрын
I'm gonna be getting Tasha's Guide this December! I hope they buff the Ranger's beastmaster soon it has so much potential!
@ethanschneiderman45574 жыл бұрын
They did in Tasha’s cauldron
@Adoribull13124 жыл бұрын
@@ethanschneiderman4557 hardly. the beast's attacks rely on your wisdom which just kills them. they had a fantastic fix for it in the revised ranger UA, i have no idea why they didn't use that one. it turned beastmaster into a real subclass.
@johnathanrhoades77514 жыл бұрын
Or make the beast master's companion a side kick 🙂
@herodontus3 жыл бұрын
"Just kidding it's about rangers" - I legitimately paused this video to go get snacks
@AnyoneCanDM4 жыл бұрын
I really love these class dissection videos and I also loved the rogue class history video! The sketches have also been top tier recently
@artcatdraws4 жыл бұрын
Another important thing to keep in mind is that it seriously depends on the dm as the dm could easily make rangers very useful in game if they would simply adjust the content. (As in the dm should make the challenges in game relavent to the characters that play it and that should include the ranger)
@JacksonOwex3 жыл бұрын
What it's the DM's job to make things relevant and interesting for the party?! NO WAY!(/s) Sorry been seeing a LOT of stuff responding to a certain video, that's how I'll refer to it and if you know you know! I still don't think I have watched the whole thing either because it was... well to be polite I COMPLETELY disagree with it and couldn't stand the video at all! Oddly enough that video is kind of relevant to this one, huh!
@matthewhamlin3924 жыл бұрын
The players guide to grim Hallow. So ordering that on Tuesday. Also with Tashas cauldron of everything.
@starofaetherius4 жыл бұрын
My favorite character I ever played was a Half-Elf Hunter Ranger with 1 level of fighter for the Protection fighting style. I used a sword and shield, some half plate armor, and made frequent use of Giant Killer and Multiattack Defense features. I was the party tank and it was both effective and fun. Btw, try the spell "absorb element" it's so much fun the situations you can create with it. In Castle Ravenloft, I leapt through a bonfire our warlock conjured in the doorway to deter a foe and I used absorb element to deal fire damage to the enemy with my attack.
@drawingjordy4 жыл бұрын
“And dying to every member of the chroma conclave you meet up with” sksksks
@calebdouglas25123 жыл бұрын
F in chat for Trinket
@RJM14104 жыл бұрын
I would also say that geralt is a ranger. He knows his enemy's, is great at tracking, martial prowess with minor magic. It's not perfect but I think it fits well enough
@alphanoodle18772 жыл бұрын
I always said Aragorn is just a fighter with the outlander background and a few feats like healer. He doesn't cast magic like rangers and doesn't seem to *really* have a favored enemy. The best example of a fantasy ranger is actually Geralt of Rivia, having a favored enemy of Monstrosity, elixirs being his buffing spells reflavored (get it?) and he actually carries magic like Rangers in dnd.
@kayasarangelo96634 жыл бұрын
XP to Level 3: *calls Mando a Ranger* Tulok the Barbarian: "This is not the way".
@CitanulsPumpkin4 жыл бұрын
I mean the simplest way to recreate the Mando is to take a ranger and then build a custom Mandalorian Death Cult background modelled on the Ravnica guild backgrounds. Give ranger like 6 or 7 specific low level wizard spells, adamantine half plate, and you're set.
@luisbencosme47574 жыл бұрын
Tulok's builds are super questionable anyways. I mean, he gave a guts build ***fire bolt*** for an arm cannon. That's not even remotely close to guts.
@carpedm98464 жыл бұрын
"Ive written this script, for three years" Oh god thats gonna be good. Sounds like you are about to kick some serious ass.
@Narcoswolf3 жыл бұрын
This video helped me fall back in love with Rangers and play a ranger. It also gave me some awesome ideas!
@X20Adam4 жыл бұрын
Say it with me: We shouldn't have to use subclasses to fix the issues present in base classes. Also yeah Tashas did a lot for Rangers and I feel like it doesn't get enough credit.
@apexkonchu22344 жыл бұрын
People only talk about Favoured Foe being nerfed from the UA version, even though the rest of the variant features are great.
@aganaom17124 жыл бұрын
expanded spell list is amazing. it might be weird to wrap your head around, but having a concentration spell in branding smite that competes with hunter's mark for potential damage output is a very nice dilemma to have. like do you risk dropping your mark to use your only 3rd level slot to dump a fat smite into that mammoth and maybe kill it outright? or do you save it to initiate the next encounter with lightning arrow on the cloud giant that's checking on his cattle?
@Smashblood1014 жыл бұрын
Ooga-chaka Ooga-Ooga Ooga-chaka Ooga-Ooga Ooga-chaka Ooga-Ooga Ooga-chaka Ooga-Ooga I can't stop this feeling Deep inside of me
@Domin8or5924 жыл бұрын
Girl, you just don't realize What you do to me
@SBdisqualified4 жыл бұрын
When you hold me In your arms so tight You let me know Everything's all right
@GreenLab-vo7vs4 жыл бұрын
@@Domin8or592 AHHHAAAHAAHAHAHA
@irok14 жыл бұрын
HOOKED ON A FEELING
@Smashblood1014 жыл бұрын
I'm high on believing!
@rev8573 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this video. I've just started playing DnD 3.5 with my wife as DM (she's been playing for 20 years), and I'm playing a Ranger. It took a few thrashings in toe-to-toe combat to work out I'm not a Fighter (lol). Now I'm doing better with ranged attack and tactics. My son plays 5e, and when I told him my character was a Ranger, he said, "Oh, the most boring class." I said, "My Ranger's not boring, he has some good feats and skills ." I'm going to send him a link to your video.
@BigJackGameplays4 жыл бұрын
"And that's what this video's all about....the Dúnedain" lol
@blackbarnz4 жыл бұрын
Yeoman. Never heard any objections concerning the legitimacy of the Ranger class before.They've been potentially OPed in the past, but the archetype concept in quintessential fantasy, . Essentially they're glorified Yeoman. King Arthur's son Mordred, The Green Knight, Robin Hood, Dar from Beastmaster, Drizzt, Prince Barin, Daniel Marks of Ironclad, Sorscha of Willow, Green Arrow, a Billy Sole from Predator, Buck Rogers. Any spiritual, woods warrior. Heck Paul Bunyan man over machine, StarWars already has Kilian Rangers & Antarian Rangers. William Tell?
@CaptnMarvelous3 жыл бұрын
Some more ranger examples: WoW Hunters (Ranged weaponry, beasts, even a melee variant) Rengar from league of legends (Tracks his prey, collects trophies from his favored foes, one with the jungle) Fran from Final Fantasy (Big bow, basic healing magic, etc.) Drizzt (Yeah thats kinda cheating)
@qxMACHINExGUNxp4 жыл бұрын
I feel like I'm the only guy that still loves him, but I was so excited for Jacob to talk about Drizzt . . .
@mateuss.98534 жыл бұрын
Me too, my first character was basically a copy of him. Drow ranger with two weapons.
@recless86674 жыл бұрын
I also expected Drizzt. I'm not a huge fan (just because of a lack of exposure), but he doesn't even work in this edition.
@XPtoLevel34 жыл бұрын
Honestly I know very little about him
@gregus10324 жыл бұрын
@@XPtoLevel3 that's ok, everyone knows Artemis is the best character that R.A. Salvatore wrote anyways.
@FotisVoutsas4 жыл бұрын
10:35 YOU USED THE SHADOW OF WAR SOUNDTRACK +1
@Sirdeathvids4 жыл бұрын
I thought it sounded very familiar, as it's like a more metal version of the Shadow of Mordor music