The Luke Mitchell Murder Case (Part 3) The Polygraph Expert

James English, The Anything Goes Show Ep54.
James talks to Terry Mullins about the lie detector tests he done with convicted murderer Luke Mitchell and His mum.
follow me on social media 🔽🔽🔽
/ jamesenglish2
/ jamesenglish0
/ jamesenglish11
You can also listen & download full Podcasts at the link below.
jamesenglish.podbean.com/
itunes.apple.com/gb/podcast/j...
Category
People & Blogs
Licence
Creative Commons Attribution licence (reuse allowed)

[@summittaedae2323]

My kids live just minutes from the scene. After hearing these podcast interviews it doesn’t sit well with me knowing there could be a person so evil is walking amongst us all. I think Luke deserves a re trial. Putting a kid in jail as a trophy gesture of giving Jodie justice is horrific. It had to be the right person not just any person. RIP Jodie 💜

[@annemariemccoll4215]

I have just read the book Innocents Betrayed by Dr Sandra Lean, there is no way Luke Mitchell committed this crime. No evidence at all, plus none of his DNA at crime scene etc. This book is well worth reading as it hows the lies that have been told regarding Luke. There definitely is a killer walking around in the town Jodie was killed.

[@loulou4148]

@@ronm9101 I have been watching James English Podcasts all Afternoon in regards to this Case, my instant reaction was: Her Family are way more involved in this Murder and have totally set Luke up! He needs a Re-Trial asap.

[@dodibl7917]

@@ronm9101 Jones family members apparently

[@paulspelly7337]

You are probably 1 of the trolls hating on the Mitchell's.. shame on you

[@paulspelly7337]

@@ronm9101 aboot??? Its about you silly doughnut 🍩

[@devobroon2352]

Brilliant interview again Mr English, absolutely brilliant that you are bringing this injustice of Luke Mitchell to the public who never knew anything about his deviously planned out trial, At last an angel has been sent to help Luke and Corinne.. Fantastic again Mr English

[@mikeyfleming849]

We should all be sharing these n making them even more public

[@bekind4803]

EXCEPTIONAL interview. As always your freestyle questioning and genuine charm puts the interviewee at ease. Interesting that you have followed two previous interviews with this one. Mr Mullins comes across as an honest, decent man. Almost hidden in the middle was the most fascinating exchange for me! The McCanns...if I had been suspected of being involved in my child's disappearance I would have INSISTED ( inadmissible in court or not) on having one in order to clear any suspicion and allow the investigating authorities to concentrate on other avenues. Just my opinion of course. Sending greetings from France James. Keep on keeping on! xx

[@JamesEnglish]

Anne Carrigan thanks Anne 👍🏼xx

[@davidprovan2466]

I'd like to see witnesses and member of the Jones family polygraphed regarding this case. Very dubious witness statements in the case in which several were changed and appeared to deliberately put Luke in the spotlight.

[@user-ll4ko4bf4v]

It’s like the story that Luke was the guilty person was a better story than some random guy.

[@mikeyfleming849]

Totally agree especially considering none of Luke's dna was found but the sisters boyfriends was n another 5 different types theres so much more look up sandra Linn shes actually from his defense boy was set up fae day one

[@mikeyfleming849]

@Brain Tweedie the police stitched him up if u watched the documentary last night the police officer was saying to him u killed Jodi......also the person that they can't name 4 legal reasons and the same person who confessed to killing her was her brother who for 3 weeks before it had started having psychotic symptoms hallucinations harming others etc the papers failed to mention that tho n that he confessed to it aswell as being sectioned 6 weeks after her death........ hmmm so the gran finds her but can't remember what she was wearing hmmm I imagine that the clothes u wore where the ones covered in blood personally I would have stripped and bagged every item of clothing that I had secondly the cousin was one of the moped boys who conveniently cut his hair and took 5 days 2 go 2 police and conveniently they can not explain where they were at the time of Luke's murder hmmm ok all a bit too convenient ain't it we now know Jodi was not murdered there she was moved n whoever done it would have had to have been covered in blood yet luke who was arrested at the scene was forensically searched and quess what nothing not even a fibre this lad needs 2b let out n the cops who put him away n are now coming forward saying he was set up should have their pensions wiped or paid back because there is now 6 cops saying it n all this talk that there was nothing like that since really does nobody remember Robert greens Aka da vinci rapist n Peter tobin himself killed that poor girl cpl years later jodis dad was a cop her bro confessed but Luke's still inside xx

[@mikeyfleming849]

Me toi especially the gran,the brother,the sister cousin and her boyfriend at the time whose dna was also funnily enough all about jodis t shirt sorry sisters lying that it was hers n Jodi took it off her bed cause HER DNA WOULD HAVE BEEN ALL ABOUT IT TOO

[@proatgunslingerlegend5691]

Totally agree I think the moped boys and her brother need looked at again I believe he’s innocent

[@craigb4719]

“I don’t like the word expert because iam always learning” brilliant answer

[@rheahayes3149]

VERY INFORMATIVE & GREAT GUEST-THANK YOU!! CHEERS FROM 🇨🇦

[@janemcguire1635]

I can't understand that finlay was the lawyer in this case and he didn't say there was no evidence regarding luke, why he didn't put that forward to the court???

[@farflungfun9505]

@@janemcguire1635 Because he's part of the system.

[@rhihanh1811]

Agreed. You can still continue to learn and be an expert!

[@rhihanh1811]

@@janemcguire1635 The fact there was no direct evidence and only circumstantial evidence linking Luke to Jodi’s murder was put to the jury. They convicted on circumstantial “evidence”.

[@limacharlieromeo8955]

James, would you consider having someone on the show who is convinced of Luke's guilt? I'm blown away by how it's glaringly obvious that he's innocent, but I'd like to hear from someone on the opposing side. What are the details/evidence that assure them he's guilty. I'd love to hear that.

[@JamesEnglish]

limacharlieromeo of course 👍🏼

[@thewateryleaf3248]

@@JamesEnglish I know someone from the area who is still convinced Luke is guilty ! Ive always believed that Luke was innocent.

[@brendanchambers9268]

if nothing else James is impartial and will give anybody a voice regardless of their opinion. given what's been portrayed so far it would be interesting to have someone from 'the other side' so to speak for some kind of balance

[@limacharlieromeo8955]

@@thewateryleaf3248 I've been reading up on it trying to figure out why everyone, jury especially, were convinced of his guilt, and I'm getting nowhere! What a fucking shambles of a case.

[@limacharlieromeo8955]

@@brendanchambers9268 it really would. as I just said to someone else above, i'm trying to find this "evidence" of his guilt and it's just not there. Not that I can see anyway. This boy needs a retrial ASAP.

[@benhart6183]

Been waiting all week and not disappointed,great free talking discussions rather than question dictated pre opinion formed interviews

[@patacorn]

A man with his head screwed on and a heart in the right place.

[@paulinemallon4195]

Good few relevant points raised in regards of who should be polygraphed before working in certain places...

[@strugglingsteve]

fantastic dude canny wait to see the outcome of this story..another great job❗👌

[@mrwhizz5703]

I was in with the boy not long after he was sentenced & I've always believed he's innocent,

[@mrwhizz5703]

He'd just been sentenced & I don't think I heard him say he was innocent, To be honest I don't know why I don't believe he did it.

[@mrwhizz5703]

Nope not stu sorry

[@mikeyfleming849]

Defo innocent

[@boogiewoogie1663]

@Brain Tweedie is there anyone to be able to send a letter to pekole in shotts prison

[@boogiewoogie1663]

@Brain Tweedie nah it’s fine was gen curious if it was possible to send a letter tae anyone like not a certain person but cheers mate no worries

[@scottishdigger4991]

Nice one Jamesy just got in from work and will be watching this a couple times 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿💙

[@JamesEnglish]

Scottish Digger 👍🏼

[@Alf180]

James love the work bud don’t watch many podcasts but always find myself watching yours 👍🏼 any chance you can get Prince Andrew on 🤣🤣

[@davidwall5288]

That’s strange how two people challenged his results and there’s two people, all over the comments, for the first two parts of this.

[@MyTube754]

Yes it looks like a few people trying to attack and prevent the truth coming out. That 2003 schoolboy was set up. Researchers have smashed the corruption wide open..

[@CeeJay-jy8xb]

41:50 was he basically saying you looked stoned oot yer box Jamesy boy 🤣🧐

[@christopherallan8040]

Donald finlay said at the time Luke should never have been found guilty on the evidence in the trial.

[@brianegan1343]

that is what defence tends to say when they lose a case lol

[@williamtomfury6453]

@@brianegan1343 unfair trail is the other should have been held somewhere else and not in edinburgh with media

[@BM-lw6gn]

@@brianegan1343 no they don't-

[@mikeyfleming849]

Wat evidence that's best of it theres like none nothing

[@bethryan9077]

You haven't heard any evidence from the trial & Lean will Never tell the people what she Does know that happened in there, just the opposite, she is hiding everything

[@ARCHSTANTON61]

he needs to test the mcCanns

[@jameswaddell9370]

The mccanns have both refused lie detector tests in the past

[@opengolfcoursesnow8603]

Watch Richard Hall's videos on that case.

[@tommyjohnstone8693]

@Payatta 555 A just watched it mate Crazy...

[@opengolfcoursesnow8603]

Jo Cox case is also crazy lol

[@ARCHSTANTON61]

@@opengolfcoursesnow8603 spot on, she is still alive .. her family just the day after she supposedly got killed, were laughing at a press conference, not a tear in sight...

[@msboomerizzle303]

I've always been in 2 minds about LM's guilt. That was before I watched these 3 videos. Now I'm positive he's innocent. The treatment that this lad has received is disgusting. I seriously hope that every single person who contributed to him being convicted is held accountable. The police, courts and even members of the Jones Family who changed their story to help in his conviction should be ashamed of themselves. Nothing will make up for Luke missing out on so many years of freedom but I hope he gets a huge compensation payout.

[@lyndad5210]

@@user-qt3fc9oe4p Why should she “shut up”? Your name is Walker; any relation to the granny, Alice Walker?

[@jasonlogan8048]

Brilliant James surely someone must have a word with this guy about luke Mitchell if that boy did not kill this girl then someone must speak up yet again mate great interview and keep going I think you are going somewhere with this James people must sit up and listen

[@mikeyfleming849]

Dr sandra lean has been trying to prove his innocence 4 years there are also people including members of jodis own family who truly believe he didn't it...I mean they tell him admit to it and we will release you yet wont give him an appeal because he refused n still maintains just like he always has maintained his innocence the things that have came to light her step da was a cop n committed suicide I wonder if the brother was his come on he fuckn confessed was having psychotic outbursts and hallucinations 3 weeks before her death sectioned 6 weeks later while confessing in between the gran was the one who cuddled Jodi yet cant remember wat she wore yet they were taken bk to police station with luke yet luke was only one stripped forensically searched n interviewed on tape ..how the fuck they let the gran walk out with they clothes on .... wow..... they left her body there overnight uncovered the bastards n then go after a 13 going on 14 year old boy he respected the families wishes didn't go to funeral yet he did go on pay his respects with his mum wat the media dont tell u is they were shouting abuse at him n of course he retaliated as anyone would n boom hes a monster I think not

[@thescottishbawbag]

Always be sceptical to anything but the complete known truth James, if you get a chance somehow to ever interview Luke , neither look at him as a guilty or innocent man, but just a man. Keep up your amazing work chap.

[@1987djm]

The former Glow star is planning to sit down with the man who continues to deny savagely murdering 14-year-old Jodi in 2003. James English has revealed he is in talks to interview notorious killer Luke Mitchell from inside jail...Read that online from the Daily Record.

[@mikeyfleming849]

Good cause the boy is innocent n needs all the help he can get in getting a re trial absolutely disgraceful what the police have got away with

[@marklee9650]

This was a really interesting interview James and was an excellent follow up from the previous podcast this gives people an insight in to the structure of the tests and the people that carry them out whether people believe these tests or not this will give everyone a greater knowledge brilliant mate keep it up

[@JamesEnglish]

Mark Lee thanks mark

[@rosiemcmahon8001]

This lad should be liberated & Donald Findlay QC should hang his head in shame! .

[@spencerstewart6516]

My opinion on this is quite simple if a child convicted of murder and still wants to stick to his innocense speaks volumes. If he had any part of the crime he would have admitted it years ago. I Feel sorry for the lad.

[@brianegan1343]

admit to killin a young girl who trustd him and had no means of defense, for no good reason? the reason he wont admit that is becaus the rest of his LONG sentense nd the rest of his life would be living hell in prison where peopl really dont like people who kill young women

[@AmandaAlexandra47]

@@brianegan1343 I see you’re very active in the comments and have a wealth of knowledge of the case ... I’m curious? what’s your opinion? Who killed the wee lass? Is Luke guilty?

[@brianegan1343]

@@AmandaAlexandra47i was local to area in 2003 and started reading about the case again about 5 year ago, 70% certain that he was guilty. That has increase to 99%+ as time has passed. lots of discussion on other forums it would take some compelling new evidence of innocence or someone elses guilt that wasn't already dismissed at trial or appeal by experts to sway me. i actually think theres a bigger story about innocence fraud here given sandra lean's checkered past, private interests like mullins, PI firms, non independent forensic labs for hire. a whole exploitative industry sprung up around true crime and guilty people are exploiting it for notoreity, gain, and to sway public in their favor see also jeremey bamber , david gilroy

[@alanbabie]

Nice on James english enjoyed that where have you being keep it up mate 💥💥💥💥

[@scottishdigger4991]

Well Jamesy that was brill and I swear no 1 can say Luke’s still guilty after this 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿💙

[@lyndahollywood5363]

Wow! This is a total cover up, a huge miscarriage of justice! It makes me so angry 😡

[@W.A.T.P...55]

Alright jamsey i think it's great your highlighting this case even if there's a small chance the boy didn't do this then his case should be retried anyway cheers James very interesting interview mate

[@galluskirsty4593]

Smashed it again james well done 🙏🏻💙

[@BritishBoy1971]

By the way James, have you got in touch with the Blundell brothers (Eddie and Billy) from Essex, about doing an interview? They are some of the most feared villains in England. They have many storys to tell.

[@staceyyoungson9189]

Thanks for covering this case and opening up eyes many people. Before this I felt he was guilty but so many reasons to doubt the conviction. Brilliantly done as always so respectful, we should all rem poor the young girl brutally murdered and hope if there is still a killer amongst us. Trial by media in this case is shocking and he should never been named or shown until found guilty. Huge mistakes been made in this case I fear the may never be rectified.

[@MyTube754]

Thank you for your observations..have you read 2024 update

[@colincorcorcoran5284]

James another great guest on your show I like how terry Mullins says he’s no expert on the polygraph test it’s just a job he does but one thing you can rest assure he will most definitely have expert experience to know if someone is trying to sway it I think listening to what he has said being the only polygraphic examiner for all the uk and it being a 16 week course crammed into 11 weeks it sounds pretty intense to me when terry said if you don’t want found out on any criminal activity the best thing to do is don’t do it sounds pretty straight forward to me thanks for another good show keep them coming I must admit I love your shows you are quite a laid back talk host and you make your guest feel at ease I admire that keep them coming from Colin Corcoran high street royal mile Edinburgh 👍🏻🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿👍🏻

[@deanwilson5744]

Luke Mitchell is innocent we all blamed him in we all oh him and his mum and family a big sorry he deserves a retrial

[@lyndahollywood5363]

Absolutely!

[@coastalrider1155]

James man you need to push this case more

[@rydo85celticfc9]

Great podcast

[@LisaBabe85]

Pizza and a new episode of 'Anything Goes' makes a perfect Friday night 👌 x

[@rhihanh1811]

Polygraph tests lack scientific validity; there’s no valid data to demonstrate efficacy and the physiological basis is shaky too. So there’s two big burdens of proof it just can’t get past to begin with. It’s a pity James English didn’t do a little more research into the subject prior to the interview. My position regards Luke Mitchell is that there is no evidence to convict him of murder beyond all reasonable doubt. The burden of proof in a court of law is the scale burden in science however even so, the “evidence” was entirely circumstantial. The media’s behaviour was reprehensible and Luke deserves a retrial. There’s enough public interest in this case to warrant one. Unfortunately, the wheels of justice run slow and in order for a retrial to be granted, there are certain legal points that need to be met. I’ve long been skeptical of the justice system relying on 12 ‘ordinary’ people to decide upon ones guilt. I’d far rather have people trained in critical and logical thinking. Humans can be stupid. The police work, which led to this case going to trial was shoddy. Unfortunately the early 2000’s was a decade in which people (as they still are today) are judged upon their label; “video nasty’s” lead people to commit violence’ was another classic example, despite there being no scientific pathway for this notion . It wasn’t just that the media painted a picture of Luke, much of what was said wasn’t even true and it appears some of this information was leaked by the police themselves.

[@michellemooresings]

Interesting expert. Thanks

[@patriciachambers1323]

Very clever man know his stuff and very honest.

[@briansmith1294]

Yes James that’s my night sorted 👍👍

[@Ron.M-yo9ht]

Looking at the three podcasts regarding Luke Mitchell It seems that Sandra and Corrine got it wrong regarding the room that Luke was in for the duration on the test 😮

[@Graham-1888]

Luke Mitchell is 100% innocent and the police know it, that poor laddie has had his life ruined along with his families lifes. Hopefully the truth comes out and heads roll for setting luke up and allowing the real killer/killers to walk free, possibly to have committed more sexually violent crimes. People are out there with blood on their hands including top police officers and from previous interviews jodi's own family.

[@meganoob9281]

If someone takes diazepam before a test. How would you know that they have lowered their blood pressure? How would one not assume that the blood pressure was at this level naturally? There may be a logical explanation. And I am not doubting Lukes results. I would like to know how you would be able to determine this?

[@abumchuckar647]

They are drug tested as well usually

[@scottyp2781]

It is hugely significant that both passed the tests comprehensively. The odds of that must be massive.

[@brianegan1343]

In 1991, two thirds of the scientific community who have the requisite background to evaluate polygraph procedures considered polygraphy to be pseudoscience. - Iacono, W.G. "Forensic 'lie detection': Procedures without scientific basis", Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, Vol. 1 (2001), No. 1, pp. 75-86.

[@bethryan9077]

Have a look at how they Both close their mouths after each 'no'.

[@lmisinnocent4469]

@@bethryan9077 this is the best thing I have read yet from you... Beth Ryan doing the lie detector and keeping her mouth gapping open after each answer. Away and find another page to troll and try doing the research this time.

[@bethryan9077]

@@lmisinnocent4469 I have done my research thanks. Unlike so many fools, I could tell you're a con artist from the moment I watched that bs 2 part doc. All I have heard from you & that so-called mother, has just Proved I was right. You started your campaign to make money from a young girl's murder because you had a book about Nothing to sell & you're a very bad person, simple as that. You are telling Me to be gone, Oh sandra, it is You Who Is Gone, Finished, Kaput. LMAO.

[@lmisinnocent4469]

@@bethryan9077 I believe you are Sandra Lean

[@TheTrichD]

I cannot find part 2 of this series James. I will remember Luke in my prayers.

[@user-qt3fc9oe4p]

Never say that again.

[@dodibl7917]

@@user-qt3fc9oe4p why?!!

[@meganoob9281]

James I must say, great strategy to first, interview the mother, then second, the ploygraph tester. This answers most questions people may have. Well done mate, keep going.

[@brendanchambers9268]

you've missed one as there's 3 pods on this case, the (criminologist?) unsure of her title tbh but she's the woman who wrote the book(s) on this case

[@brendanchambers9268]

save you looking for it :) m.kzbin.info/www/bejne/nKK0aJ-kqsiIg6s

[@meganoob9281]

@@brendanchambers9268 Thanks for the link. I did watch this, it slipped my mind. If there is no sort of reopening of the case at least, I will become very suspicious.

[@brendanchambers9268]

too many people with too much to lose, hopefully someone with real influence (no offence James) gets their teeth into this and doesn't let go till they get to the bottom of what went on and why!

[@s999geo]

Another good interview James 👏 can the polygraph be seen or is it not public ?

[@32paulcolley44]

It was shown on a recent documentary on channel 5. Murder in a small town

[@s999geo]

@@32paulcolley44 thanks 👍

[@Lesley_78]

It's on youtube

[@Polo365]

I served a life sentence here in Scotland, and was in Shorts prison way before Luke, asked for a polygraph. My AD told me it wasn't worth the paper it's written on. Don't get me wrong I was in shotts, at some of the time he was there but the boy was behind wood at the time so never met the boy. Loads of miscarriage of justice happen. I am living proof. I've been out 8 years with nothing to lose except to tell you all the truth

[@Polo365]

QC

[@scottishdigger4991]

Polo65 get James to get you on mate and tell your story

[@lindac2786]

Having watched this, there is reasonably doubt so no conviction should have been given😡😡

[@Asshole88]

Exactly. All circumstantial. Should at the very least have the verdict not proven.

[@pinkkitten011]

Interesting to say the least hearing Terry explaining that he’s been unable to access prisons to do polygraphs recently. Why is that?? Very suspicious imo. Luke is innocent and a retrial is long overdue!

[@dodibl7917]

If they admitted lie detectors work there would be no need for lawyers etc so better so say they're not accurate

[@BritishBoy1971]

I met a woman from Johannesburg, in South Africa and she said that whenever anything expensive goes missing from the offices she works in, the staff have to sit a lie detector test, usually starting with the cleaners.

[@mikeyfleming849]

That's actually shocking

[@bedadays1763]

Let’s say Luke is innocent and it appears to be in that direction.Is there a possibility the real killer was always known and had contacts?

[@dodibl7917]

Family has protected him all this time, @sweetstrretscotland did a great podcast with Scott forbes, most folk in the area suspected this all along he's just said what everyone else was thinking

[@dodibl7917]

@TruthSeekers I saw jodis mum a few weeks ago Omg I wanted to say so much to her, however I didn't, If my son murdered my daughter I'd stick him in myself not blame some poor woman's wee laddie, it makes me so angry what that family have done

[@dodibl7917]

Not forgetting the polices part in all this too, heads should roll for this

[@artsy38]

@@dodibl7917 you don't know that ya absoulte bealter . The daughter has been murdered now your questioning the mum and brothers involvement because u watched a podcast . If u do live close to the mum or brother and question her u really are a terrible human being.

[@dodibl7917]

@@artsy38 a terrible human being is a woman who had lied for 19yrs to cover up the fact her psycho son murdered her daughter and blamed an innocent laddie. I didn't reach my conclusion by watching a podcast but by doing my own research ya absolute belter!!

[@Amelialovesrainbowfriends]

Feel so sorry for Luke n his mum definitely innocent there's no evidence think some sort cover up hope he get re trial

[@tommyjohnstone8693]

When is the Tommy Robinson 1 coming on you said very soon last week 😂😂

[@JamesEnglish]

This Sunday 👍🏼

[@tommyjohnstone8693]

Cheers mate

[@01god01]

James what a shout macanns polygraph and as for luke get one of the Jones family to explain the corruption they seem to have caused..........

[@01god01]

Watch the first and the second podcast about this

[@davebranch16]

Very interesting

[@markvega5036]

Mitchell is as guilty as sin

[@JGI43]

Proof fella ? Or u talking crap 💩

[@andywilson2216]

If these lie detectors come into play then its basically if you dont take 1 then your guilty, its bad enough if you dont take the stand and give no comment interviews. In joe steeles case and possibly lukes then these are the only 2 i know of that they would benefit whereas is could tell you about 101 cases where somebodys did the crime and walked at court so sometimes we need to be careful what we wish for.

[@irishbrother4289]

I hope Luke gets out and sues the corrupt as fuck Justie System

[@lillyplant4035]

What if you have a silent fart when doing a lie detector?

[@juliebryant3968]

Idiot

[@lillyplant4035]

@@juliebryant3968 Legit question, can cause movement.

[@crushfloss782]

🤣🤣🤣

[@grahammackay5965]

James you should request an interview with luke

[@jameswaddell9370]

He is in talks with it just now

[@davidtaylor3318]

@@jameswaddell9370 Seriously?

[@bethryan9077]

Yes & sit the girls autopsy photos right in front of him

[@ianjohnston1391]

See James like...... right there was people making faces at him like as him mum said there was......

[@stumiller5883]

Been looking frwd to this 1

[@craigb4719]

James I gave just read the Daily Record App is it true you are planning on interviewing Luke Mitchell from inside the jail .🤔

[@Stef-X]

They wouldn't get the security clearance, but he could from a mobile phone if he has access.

[@mikeyfleming849]

Omg yes they have access to mobile phones in the jail now so it could be done x

[@dodibl7917]

That would be fantastic

[@thewateryleaf3248]

Why not interview Scottie McClue? Now that would be quite interesting !

[@mikeyfleming849]

Her gran sister n sisters fella n 2 cousins 4a start robert green's and a couple of the coppers who put him away would be immense with james and sandra Linn asking questions

[@mikeyfleming849]

They could even polygraph them twice while there would be very very interesting indeed

[@bethryan9077]

@@mikeyfleming849 How about some truth serum for sandra lean

[@karenmcardle142]

He is a clever guy . He doesn't read the newspapers, the papers go hand in hand with the police. Even if you do get an honest lawyer , and God forbid he wins the case , he gets blackballed and is no longer a QC/lawyer.

[@RichardCurran]

See if you put your face up to that lamp in the background, your nose in the middle and the two poles on your cheeks, then switch it on you get a pretty good electric shock. Free tip for you James, get bored of that polygraph machine don't worry the rest of your night is sorted.

[@skelly835]

what I want to know is why are we only being shown a video of him taking the test and told he passed but the results are not published?

[@carriejorobinson4829]

The results were published. Mail on Sunday, who financed it, had the Mitchells' agreement to publish everything regardless of the results

[@MyTube754]

Get a grip 😅😅

[@trojanjock30]

Brilliant James, great insight into the world of the lie detection process . still don't understand it all but now I'm not as clueless as I was. ........still won't take one though, wife might see the results hahaha

[@nutonehiphop7505]

He won't get out until the police that fitted him up retire.

[@maureencooper1391]

Or police and the courts are made accountable for their actions in light of these podcasts and other information that’s presented. They’re refusing and stalling retrial etc as they know there actions were corrupt

[@Vinseneb]

Intriguing stuff!

[@jimmybegg8009]

maybe celtic different identity should try this polygraph

[@roseanneshannon6343]

I'm puzzled as to how they had zero dna or any other evidence yet still found Luke Mitchell to be guilty? .Never herd eh that in my life and Donald Finley is a top q c who knows his stuff so why did he not fight this in court ? Plus I've never herd of a judge saying no emotions to be shown WTFrance ? something weird going on here hmm... Hope Mitchell gets a retrial after all he has human rights. Thankyou james love your vids and respect you much Stay humble and non judge mental it suits you God bless .

[@1987djm]

Donald probably got a back hander as in money ,everyone has a price,he has got other people off with the person having way more evidence against them than luke had...The police fucked up that crime scene and if they never got someone people would of lost there jobs and promotions etc,so they had to make sure luke was found guilty,Even the prison officers knew luke was innocent i was in yoi polmont when luke was in and it was common knowledge that luke was set up and the prison staff said that luke would be out within a year or 2 on appeal and this was when i was 16/17 i think so 15 years ago roughly and yet here we are.....no weapon no DNA no blood on him,how could he get rid off all that evidence within such short space of time?no blood of hers found in his house,and then why would he do all that then lead the straight to the body?If hes been smart enough to do all that he would defo be sart enough to distance himself from the crime scene....the police fucked up and Luke was scape goat,also there was used condom found near body yet that guy was let away with his answer being he masterbating near there near the time,what are chances of that happening....come one...wake up how many other people are sitting in jail innocent after a set up by police....There is another case its the essex murders they guys are innocent and wont get out as like luke they wont admit there guilt as they know they had fuck all to do with it...(SCAPE GOATS)thats what these men and woman are who get done like this,The papers are most to blame for lukes guilt,as jury would of seen all this about him and already made up there minds before trial started...its a fucking joke.

[@roseanneshannon6343]

1987djm I know only to well a back hander is money family done it for years with Baltrami lol. Aye it's a joke. Let's just hope n pray a retrial is granted and the truth prevails. Peace .

[@ourwilliam2405]

Interesting how he says @21 minutes that most innocent people are the most nervous. Luke was very calm through out it. Obviously hes going to say its almost full proof, its his business.

[@bazjr86]

Exactly. They can't be that good as he's dumped them for the eye detection tests instead.

[@erniehemingway6993]

Ren would be amazing guest James English best musicians in the world

[@andrewhunter8325]

Did the author not say people were walking by constantly, putting him off.. and now he is saying that wasnt the case - it was just the guard? - im sure she said the guard and passers by being nosey?

[@Nocomments666]

Shouldn’t encourage bullshit

[@bmwoodphotography7260]

A clenched ring piece 🤣 Great interview technique 🤣

[@raycroal]

free luke mitchell now

[@loulou4148]

Can anybody tell me whether a Petition has been set up in order to gain Signatures for a Re-Trial please?

[@loulou4148]

Ok I just found it and Signed and Shared on FB also.

[@bazjr86]

@@loulou4148 think it got 25000 signs

[@shonagiffen4913]

Always thought he was innocent as I watched a doc years ago about it . What a shame !

[@kellymarietarotfamilypets9598]

Don’t no why they bother with the polygraph because it’s not used for evidence so why bother?? There actually not always spot on! A man who killed 3 people passed a lie detector and he was found guilty later of the murders and admitted it! Boggles my mind! 🤯 anyway James brilliant podcast. Just getting through a lot that I ain’t seen lol 😂 thank you 🙏🏼

[@stephenmcguire8545]

Not everyone can pass it.

[@ricky4mel]

James help them out, get that. Sad or parra I think who works with misscarages against the police, give the guy his due and what have both families got to loose bro

[@briangatt2956]

People who suffer from anxiety can potentially fail a test too,

[@RoguePenguinScotland]

Power lies where man believes it lies. I put this shit in the same category as TV licence Vans and Astrology. Just pure mind fuckery

[@rickybaillie4222]

Jeremy Kyle has left the chat

[@andywilson2216]

not finished watching this episode yet but i do enjoy your podcasts james. One thing i will point out is that you never done yourself justice by not jumping on the fact corrine told us that during lukes polygraph there was glass panels and could see along from rooms 1 to 5 (13:40 corrines podcast). And i know you picked up on it bcoz of your reaction and wouldve liked you to point out to terry that she told us this so he could say "its a lie" because hes quick to point out that wasnt the case and you never followed this up and looked uncomfortable . Also i watched a documentary on bbci player last night called murder in suburbia and the accused ended up refusing to take the test in the end at the point the polygraph expert was in the prison. His name was Don Cargill the chairman of the british and european polygraph association with 38 yrs experience so he is the highest in the field.

[@drsandralean8036]

I was in the room as an observer when the polygraph was conducted. There's one solid wall and four or five glass "boxes" built off from that wall. Luke and I were sitting with our backs to the wall, Terry was facing it. Anyone who's been in Shotts will be able to confirm the layout of those rooms - nobody's lying. When Terry said the guard was standing "behind him" he meant behind him, outside of the glass wall and door, not behind him in the room. Hope that helps!

[@andywilson2216]

@@drsandralean8036 Im afraid it doesnt! unless you can explain, im familiar with the agents visits and i understand that Luke couldve seen the guard from over terrys shoulder making faces is this correct? However Terry clearly states that he does the polygraph to the persons BACK and can tell on the charts that they are not sleeping etc (38mins) but ive seen Lukes polygraph and theres a white wall behind him so why change the procedure? If hes facing the wall he can open his eyes, NO? EDIT : VOICE OF POLYGRAPH CLEARLY NOT BEHIND LUKE

[@drsandralean8036]

@@andywilson2216 Terry said "in the modern test, the person has his back to the examiner" - that's not how it was done back in 2012. I don't know why they changed the procedure, or when - (I'll ask Terry and come back to you with his reply), but at the time, the way the tests were done was with the subject facing the examiner (you'll notice Corinne's test is done in exactly the same way). So, yes, Luke could see the guard over Terry's shoulder because he was sitting face to face with Terry, not with his back to him.

[@andywilson2216]

Thanks for the information because when things like this get brought up, if there is any flaws in what’s been said then it doesn’t do Luke any favours. This error on terrys behalf is what left the door open for the 2 anonymous to say he was meditating I feel it should be redone for Luke sake so there is nothing left for scrutiny like showing the people how the results are read and not just telling us. Nobody believes what they are told unless it’s in numbers

[@bethryan9077]

@@drsandralean8036 Always spin in your answers sandra. He could have moved his chair & the table, so stop lying

[@scottyboy308]

Guilty by media ,and I'm from Edinburgh and remember when this happened just outside Edinburgh in east houses beside Mayfield, I didn't believe that Luke done anything wrong back in time when it had taken place, RIP Jodi Jones GBNF, who has done this horrific crime or killing or murder of the young girl I mean 14 year old and the media was at Luke Mitchell mum's home in East houses on the next morning for the media to get to know about his at 14 life same age as his girlfriend Jodi, Luke Mitchell was the only one who was convicted by the media from evidence that police Scotland had been serving the media a young man and he was only 14 he was getting bullied by the cameras outside of his mum's house the whole time until they took him away, I don't forget about Jodi either because she's the victim of course.

[@MyTube754]

So what's your point 👉 keep up 2024...

[@scottyboy308]

@@MyTube754 sarcasm will get you no where with someone like myself , I put up that comment 8 months ago when I didn't really know as much as I know now but that was then this is now , 8 months forward I've done my homework on this case and a lot of it just as much as there is to watch and listen, been involved with the whole team on a few occasions up the places that I am not going to discuss with you or any other stranger on KZbin, just thought I'd say that because you put the sly comment up 6 days ago so maybe you should do a little bit of homework on someone who you think knows nutin eh self explanatory don't you think and am being decent, that comment from 8 months ago is old news paper to me, so you know the date anyway and is anything poppin soon eh or you just clout !?! .

[@thomaspenman4101]

i think lukes innocent and the real killer is out there

[@TommyMcG]

The killer is already dead apparently

[@detectingadventuresscotlan6035]

@@TommyMcG we a thought was luke Judging by media frenzy at the time Now seems like The c P s just wanted conviction If he gets retrial And not guilty Laws need chsnged To many descrepranses And to many Professionals On his side

[@bethryan9077]

@@TommyMcG Kane was on cctv & Never a suspect. The Real sadistic monster is where he will stay

[@davidlynch2006]

Nana Carstairs hehe 😂

[@karlwood313ify]

Polygraph isn't 100% so not reliable. To enforce its use as if it was 100% would be a disaster. He's not facing the fact that people can't recall or know every detail he assumes they do. We cannot allow a polygraph test to become the jury. We just need to provide an astute jury for serious cases.

[@rosshill9619]

Nightshift viewing sorted.

[@rickybaillie4222]

Hoo I'm on the night shift lol

[@rosshill9619]

@@rickybaillie4222 hoi! Keep the noise down!!

[@MrGoldenV]

Security?

[@rosshill9619]

@@MrGoldenV nope.

[@therewewent1inarow516]

Pulling faces, seriously?

[@joanmulligan3672]

This young man is innocent!!!!

[@davidlynch2006]

Ask his sister

[@foryourlugsonly]

Gary Ridgeway.

[@GusMac6129]

Absolutely no interest in this one, these machines can be beaten. And results can be manipulated. How about Mark Dallas on your podcast, local Glasgow lad, i'm sure he has a great story to tell regards to his business.

[@michelleshort3528]

M mm ññ NB Jo

[@GusMac6129]

@@Autisticwanderer What could i learn Scott?, please enlighten me.

[@highlanstar1]

I remember this when I was younger Fuck me only found put he passed the polygraph test Ffs

[@bethryan9077]

He had plenty of time to practise how to fool that machine. Watch how he closes his mouth after each no, Corrine did the exact same thing.

[@JGI43]

@@bethryan9077yeah ok Beth your all over this case talking utter garbage

[@bethryan9077]

@@JGI43 Yeah OK Jamie boy, I'm all over this case making Fools of all those like Yourself. Duh.

[@JGI43]

@@bethryan9077 yeah ok , every Luke Mitchell video on KZbin your on here spouting nonsense, what are u a copper ??

[@bethryan9077]

@@JGI43 I tell the True Facts about this case sonny boy, it's Not my fault that You're a brainwashed zombie. Doh.

[@liveatvictoria6853]

I made a comment earlier, which I've struck, because at the beginning of this interview I got the impression this person thought the young man guilty. I apologize for my comment,

[@MrTagg03]

Cmon if this crapped works we would be using it no need for jurys

[@gavaka8622]

It’s 90- 95% accurate, which isn’t full proof, so it can’t be used. If you opened your ears and engaged your brain then you will hear that there are many other factors in place that determine wether a person is being truthful or not. Taking all these factors into consideration, then the chances of Luke and his mother passing every question posed (in 3 different ways) are so slim that you have to take the view point that they where telling the truth.

[@TwoAwesomeKids34]

Where's the naked martin podcast