The Map of Chemistry

The entire field of chemistry summarised in 12mins from simple atoms to the molecules that keep you alive.
#chemistry #DomainOfScience
If you would like to buy a poster of this map, they are available here: www.redbubble.com/people/domi...
I have also made a version available for educational use which you can find here: flic.kr/p/UBS4mf
and a widescreen version: flic.kr/p/UNA1LW
Errata and notes:
1. I got the Oxidising Agent and the Reducing Agent the wrong way around! Sodium is the Reducing agent and Chlorine is the Oxidising agent. My confusion was that when a sodium atom looses an electron it becomes oxidised, so in my simple brain, I called it the oxidising agent. That is wrong because the agent that oxidises the sodium is the chlorine atom and so the labels are the wrong way around. Doh!
2. I drew the hydrogen H2 molecule with a double bond but it should be a single bond because they are bonded with a single covalent bond.
3. Where I have drawn carbon dioxide, the carbon should have a double bond to each of the oxygens.
4. Apparently Feynman diagrams are not that useful for theoretical chemistry, so perhaps that wasn't the best choice for the illustration. The feedback in the comments from a real theoretical chemist is "All we deal with is shuffling around electrons, but many many many electrons, so a Feynman diagram would need to be huge but at the same time would be very very repetitive."
5. In analytical chemistry, I should have called it distillation rather than precipitation.
6. My definition of organic chemistry being about ‘life’ is not very good. I should have said that organic chemistry looks at compounds that contain carbon. But there are some compounds in inorganic chemistry that also contain carbon, like carbon dioxide so I guess I'd also have to state that inorganic chemistry is almost everything else.
7. I said that fuels are inorganic chemistry which is misleading when I drew a car next to it. My understanding is that there are inorganic fuels that don't contain carbon, but obviously all the fuels we are familiar with are organic. I thought a picture of a car would tie a few things together elegantly, but it ended up giving the wrong impression. That’s okay, I’m still learning! :D
8. In inorganic chemistry, I should have stated that all natural minerals fall under inorganic chemistry so as not to be misleading, otherwise you might go way thinking that only man-made substances fall under inorganic chemistry which is not true. I said that 'a lot of the inorganic compounds that are studied are man-made' meaning that the cutting edge of research is mostly man-made substances.
9. Apparently water is not the most inflammable substance. I thought it was so that is interesting.
10. In the bonding section, hydrogen bonding and van der waals forces are technically inter molecular forces.
Here are some of the references I used for this video if you’d like to dig a little deeper
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemistry
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outline...
www.uwlax.edu/chemistry-and-b...
www.khanacademy.org/science/c...
www.cancerquest.org/cancer-bi...
Early smelting:
ispatguru.com/evolution-of-bla...
Categorisation of reactions
www2.ucdsb.on.ca/tiss/stretton...
Thanks so much to my supporters on Patreon. If you enjoy my videos and would like to help me make more this is the best way and I appreciate it very much. / domainofscience
Frontiers of Space: nobrow.net/shop/professor-astr...
Atomic Adventure: nobrow.net/shop/professor-astr...
Intergalactic Activity Book: nobrow.net/shop/professor-astr...
Solar System App:
Find me on twitter, instagram, and my website:
dominicwalliman.com
/ dominicwalliman
/ dominicwalliman
/ dominicwalliman

[@llewelynmoriscorvinus6514]

DoS: Water, the least explody or burny thing around. Alkali Metals: Hold my electron.

[@exonanimations1234]

That is clever lmao

[@Gravitraxer_AangCZ]

Hold my *electron*

[@radheyvarshney3153]

Let me pour h2so4.

[@weirnershittler6752]

@@radheyvarshney3153 Nah let's mix that with some good ol' HBr

[@lorenzoandropoli5627]

JUST _PLEASE_ HOLD MY *FUCKING* *_ELECTRON_*

[@Paleiko0630]

PhD in physical chemistry here, just wanted to say: Very well done, thank you, I'm glad to see quantum chemistry being included.

[@rhidiandavies1991]

Whenever someone mentions quantum chemistry I get PTSD type flash backs about Gaussian distributions.

[@user-gn5kl5ou5j]

I respect scientists

[@alanzinati727]

props to you for dealing with physical chemistry

[@Will-ql2fl]

I am a biochemistry student and I have PTSD on biochemistry

[@divypatel1002]

How can someone talk about physical chemistry without mentioning Kinetics, Quantum and Thermodynamics.

[@cyanide6954]

Short answer: periodic table Long answer: periodic table doing stuff

[@workout9594]

No one: Schools: Wanna learn about water for a semester?

[@richardprichard7917]

for a semester? That's a major right there

[@pasticcinideliziosi1259]

Also schools (in Italy): 9th grade: study of earth and water 10th grade: biology 11th grade: chemistry 12th grade: the rest of study of earth I mean, shouldn’t they be more “ordinated”? Like chemistry first year and then you go to more specific things

[@therealmelone1530]

⁠​⁠@@pasticcinideliziosi1259depends on what kind of high school you go to. I’m at an applied sciences lyceum and we learn chemistry from 10th all the way to 12th grade

[@JanboelPe]

Chemistry is about the things that matter.

[@vito2320]

Nothing you think matters matters - Rick Sanchez

[@tsunami5884]

@@vito2320 lols i didn't get that at 1st but just got it XD

[@lincolndexter9514]

@@vito2320 cringe and stale

[@ruatsangawhite7261]

@@lincolndexter9514 nah...witty and brilliant

[@cesardachimp8172]

Pun intended?

[@unlimited1652]

If most Education were like this, the efficiency in content assimiliation would be astronomic.

[@zajec11]

he's just sad that education is shit, because of which he made a mistake. Not that ironic

[@wilamsanmngap5736]

+katten elvis your right ...but u have to admit that this video is far more interesting and satisfying than schools/colleges book

[@reaniegane]

This video was fun because it was entertaining. But you can't learn the actual subject matter unless you rigorously study the proper textbook. Improve your personal studying skills in order to assimilate the content better.

[@reaniegane]

A very good example is TMPChem. He does the same thing for quantum chemistry and chemical thermodynamics. He covers exactly the same thing that the textbook does.

[@DegrowthPlaylists]

IB chemistry covers almost all of this in the span of two years.

[@MynameisS_A]

This guy taught me 12 years of chemistry in just 12 minutes. Legend

[@dominator2707]

Nah, he just touched tips of the icebergs of each topic.

[@pancake9707]

@@dominator2707 iceberg? lmao what

[@dominator2707]

@@pancake9707 thx, I forgot the word for some reason.

[@peelysl]

He didn't teach you shit stop lying

[@loriwitzel9635]

I'd make a chemistry joke... but I wouldn't get a reaction

[@-yourandyoureare2different612]

Francium!

[@crimsonnite9291]

Badumtssss

[@slackerengi2401]

That's gold

[@Gravitraxer_AangCZ]

WE...Argon.

[@1.4142]

na you won't.

[@melancholic90s49]

Map Of Computer Science Map Of Quantum Mechanics Map Of Nuclear Physics Map Of Engineering Map Of Philosophy Great Video By The Way !

[@spencerallbritton9459]

I second this, maybe each kind of Engineering especially Electrical an Mechanical. A few others to do: 1. Biology 2. Astrophysics/Cosmology 3. Genetics 4. Psychology 5. Medicine 6. Standard Model of Physics (Our understanding of the basic forces and particles) 7. CERN 8. Evolution 9. Economics 10. Geology. And other specific disciplines in STEM. (Edit: 11. A map of the greatest minds in science and their achievements. Basically, the most important contributions to our understanding of nature and reality.

[@l.fsader6021]

Keep dreaming

[@NomadUrpagi]

Map of Dota please. Kappa.

[@Spark10STUDIOS]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/iImqYptmZ71omMk Plz watch it's funny

[@FBI-qk9tk]

Spark10 STUDIOS not funny

[@TechnoCreeper2016]

Map of Maps

[@perspectiveofmartin2455]

Techno Creeper haha

[@eleutheriakouin]

Techno Creeper that is actually a plausible idea since he could talk about: global map, globes, each countries map, geomorphological maps, religion maps, No 1 death causes/economy/population density maps and a crap ton of others

[@bossfeild3523]

“The Map of Geography”

[@exxelsetijadi5348]

Cartography ?

[@giantrunt]

Map of cartography

[@ahwanitavi7093]

4:45 In this reaction, Chlorine (Cl) gains an electron and gets reduced so it is oxidising Sodium (Na), therefore it should be oxidising agent and Sodium (Na) vice-versa should be reducing agent.

[@ansel-0571]

I think it's the matter of presentation, maybe he means Na+ is an oxidising agent and Cl- is a reducing agent.

[@lucapelletier4752]

@@ansel-0571 yes but thats not correct

[@vegboylokesh7778]

Wad searching for this

[@AtsAstover]

Excellent. Paused the video at this point myself. Wikipedia also says that the video is not correct. "An oxidizing agent (also known as an oxidant, oxidizer, electron recipient, or electron acceptor) is a substance in a redox chemical reaction that gains or "accepts"/"receives" an electron from a reducing agent (called the reductant, reducer, or electron donor). "

[@markmcphee6996]

@@AtsAstover what was stated was clearly incorrect; mistakes happens...Overall, very good synopsis. Show this to a class of AP students and see if they can find the error.

[@zachkills4]

Watching this made me realize how difficult chemistry is. Physics was actually easier for me.

[@genius6084]

@@jaydenguan4708 Every subject is difficult on its own and some may be more difficult to some person that to the other, it's "all relative", ;D

[@anandbalivada7461]

Definitely agree...I actually watched this video to try to get a better idea of the structure of chemistry as a field because trying to structure the ideas like physics and math isn't working out for me and I am not able to learn the interesting stuff in chem (trying to bridge the gap between quantum mechanics and biomolecules, while actually learning about the various mechanisms, syntheses etc.) without it taking a toll on how I am doing on various exams.

[@anandbalivada7461]

@@jaydenguan4708 You are comparing the frontier of theoretical physics (string theory) with high school chemistry. A more fair comparison would be between the study of chemical reaction networks and mechanisms and biomolecular structure inside a single cell, understanding the kinetics involving complex molecules ab initio (i.e. start with quantum mechanics and build up to kinetics), in general trying to predict the formation of molecules and even heavy elements, and figuring out how to synthesise chemicals for all kinds of practical purposes like medicines, materials etc. Any question in research chemistry is the literal definition of a hard problem; it's unclear whether a solution even exists and even an attempt to do so has to begin as a shot in the dark. The difficulty of physics is tangible at least and mathematics can be fruitfully used to make immediate progress. In chemistry, the sheer complexity has resulted in the adoption of heuristics rather than a universal mathematical formulation (which is literally computationally intractable; quantum many body problem is exponential) so yeah it's incredibly difficult and a loooot less flashy than String Theory.

[@Will-ql2fl]

As biochemistry undergraduate student, i disagree on you. My results for chemistry is far more higher than physic everytime

[@JoaoVitor-gk7mr]

In the Universe, physics, chemistry are the same things ksksksks. The distiction is just for us.

[@domainofscience]

Hey thanks for all the feedback everyone. There have been a bunch of great comments keeping me in check when I have got things wrong, and loads of people saying they enjoy this content which is very encouraging. Unfortunately I made a few mistakes, so here are a few clarifications. I have also put these in the description. This list is longer than I would like, so I'm going to try harder on the next videos to get things perfect! Thanks everyone. 1. I got the Oxidising Agent and the Reducing Agent the wrong way around! Sodium is the Reducing agent and Chlorine is the Oxidising agent. My confusion was that when a sodium atom looses an electron it becomes oxidised, so in my simple brain, I called it the oxidising agent. That is wrong because the agent that oxidises the sodium is the chlorine atom and so the labels are the wrong way around. Doh! 2. I drew the hydrogen H2 molecule with a double bond but it should be a single bond because they are bonded with a single covalent bond. 3. Where I have drawn carbon dioxide, the carbon should have a double bond to each of the oxygens. 4. Apparently Feynman diagrams are not that useful for theoretical chemistry, so perhaps that wasn't the best choice for the illustration. The feedback in the comments from a real theoretical chemist is "All we deal with is shuffling around electrons, but many many many electrons, so a Feynman diagram would need to be huge but at the same time would be very very repetitive." 5. In analytical chemistry, I should have called it distillation rather than precipitation. 6. My definition of organic chemistry being about ‘life’ is not very good. I should have said that organic chemistry looks at compounds that contain carbon. But there are some compounds in inorganic chemistry that also contain carbon, like carbon dioxide so I guess I'd also have to state that inorganic chemistry is almost everything else. 7. I said that fuels are inorganic chemistry which is misleading when I drew a car next to it. My understanding is that there are inorganic fuels that don't contain carbon, but obviously all the fuels we are familiar with are organic. I thought a picture of a car would tie a few things together elegantly, but it ended up giving the wrong impression. That’s okay, I’m still learning! :D 8. In inorganic chemistry, I should have stated that all natural minerals fall under inorganic chemistry so as not to be misleading, otherwise you might go way thinking that only man-made substances fall under inorganic chemistry which is not true. I said that 'a lot of the inorganic compounds that are studied are man-made' meaning that the cutting edge of research is mostly man-made substances. 9. Apparently water is not the most inflammable substance. I thought it was so that is interesting. 10. In the bonding section, hydrogen bonding and van der waals forces are technically inter molecular forces.

[@justinmalik6977]

Calm down master, you'r great ;)

[@sucail128]

Domain of Science on the topic of the pictures of the compounds, ammonia is also wrong as it has pyramidal geometry and not trigonal planar geometry edit: the diagrams at 4:15 are also all wrong besides water

[@vedxgaming8216]

Domain of Science please please please tell me the name of software u use to make these drawins and animations.....btw love form India

[@daviddet]

The best way to describe organic chemistry is the chemistry involving compounds with hydrocarbon structures. All organic compounds are small sites of reactive structures (called functional groups) embedded into a hydrocarbon backbone that gives the molecule structure. It is also a good idea to point out that each of the different sub fields of chemistry are actually very highly united. As an organic chemist, I will regularly use concepts and techniques from inorganic, analytical, physical, and quantum areas. I don't use biochemistry, but that doesn't mean other organic chemists also don't. Your comment on fuels would probably more accurately describe rocket fuels. From a quick search, it looks like the vast majority of rocket fuels are salts like nitrates or perchlorates, or liquids like hydrazine or hydrogen peroxide.

[@ialivegoldentm6254]

Also, I’ve already heard from two different chemistry professors that only are molecules the covalent compounds. This mean that a compound as NaCl isn’t a molecule, but a ionic compound. Therefore, not all types of compounds are molecules. *I don’t have certain, but I think that molecule is a synonym to covalent compound. *I’m not fluent in english, thus, I may have commited some gramatical mistakes.

[@winstongraham944]

I do not mind the long gaps between videos if the quality is this damn high. Keep up you're inspiring work.👍

[@genius6084]

@Monroe Harmon Maybe he meant that the guy is inspiring work. Ok I'll shut up

[@raicyceprine8953]

These maps of science really gives me a broad perspective of what I'm studying. THANKS FOR MAKING IT CLEAR🖒🖒🖒

[@albireothestarthebacklight2990]

[?]

[@sitansh7450]

"I like to think about chemistry as the study of change"

[@kingrobert7246]

Rick Sanchez you’re goddamn right

[@wildbee68]

“Ionic bonds. Chapter 6.”

[@divypatel1002]

Mr. Walt?

[@SmokingSexyStyle]

@@kingrobert7246 I agree

[@SmokingSexyStyle]

@@divypatel1002 Hello, I like your pfp :>

[@MinionNoMore]

👍 Vote up if you want: 'The Map of Philosophy'

[@Mightyminionrush]

MinionNoMore Yess!

[@danielhall271]

Me too!

[@Sporkabyte]

Cauchy if you think that it's worth time considering questions that can't be answered scientifically like "how can we know things?" and "what is the right thing to do in an ethically challenging situation?", then you would disagree.

[@elderlyoogway]

Cauchy You're wrong. Political philosophy, ethical philosophy, logic, science philosophy are just some areas that deeply affect everyone's life. Inside of each there are even more branches, epistemology dealing with definition of knowledge, bioethics and law, metaphysics of ordinary ideologies. To stupidly claim what you said is to attest your own ignorance as self-confirmed intelligence.

[@eboysix]

But how do you define philosophy as a map?

[@ACSReactions]

Yes! We've been waiting for this one! Great video.

[@0x19]

:o

[@Green__Man]

We're gonna need a Map of all these Maps soon, I'm obsessed with these videos, thank you for doing the lords work

[@melyxcyberspace]

I get really nervous and confused when ppl tell me to "follow along" without knowing the bigger picture of concepts, so this video really helps as a guide with that, the video also re-enforces what i already know, to make sure i understood it correctly. Thank you for doing this and putting it out for the world :)

[@caine2778]

Great video but you got oxidising agent and reducing agent mixed up

[@aliasgeranees8893]

Caine ya chlorine was oxidizing agen as it got reduced making sodium oxidized

[@dancingleaf5826]

Caine ye

[@muazkashif8554]

Caine Yeah, I caught that too.

[@domainofscience]

Darn it! :D Thanks for pointing this out. I'm a dummy.

[@I_Echion]

how? when it gives a elektron away it gets positif charged hence the plus

[@sadmanmahdi8281]

sodium is REDUCING AGENT !!!!

[@niagaramst]

Quite right. At 4:53, sodium is oxidized as it loses an electron (OIL) hence it is the reducing agent.

[@nikolaterzic8184]

@Carlos Silva well yeah exactly, they got it wrong in the video

[@fahdal-sebaey3322]

stopped the video and went down looking for this comment to make sure I didn't go crazy thanks!

[@vaibhavdwivedi7005]

Yep

[@hey-fv2gg]

I just paused the video and scrolled down to see if somebody had corrected it, thanks

[@macgirl1965]

I love this format of explaining this important but seemingly complex information in a way that provides knowledge in a visually interesting way

[@Lucaserik]

A lot people underestimate the degree of knowledge you have to have in I certain subject to be able to condense it in such a beautiful way.

[@MakisHMMY]

One thing i liked a lot back when i was being taught some chem, was the Van der Waals bonding. It's the first bond which is really very weak, but has a great impact. Good stuff!

[@kxloux8466]

More of a force than a bond

[@HassanAhmed-rf9xr]

I think it was also called London forces. But I like that name better.

[@vikramaditya6812]

@@HassanAhmed-rf9xr no London forces are different. They are temporarily formed due to asymmetrical orbitals. They are really week. Van der Waals forces are relatively stronger.

[@Entropeace]

@@vikramaditya6812 Actually, there are London forces and there are dipole - dipole forces (the stronger one). Both these intermolecular forces fall under the collective name - Van der Waals forces

[@bronson8x993]

Man, your contents style is top notch. These summarizing videos of different fields in science are absolute gold in YT. Thank you for doing this! I have now a much better sense of what kind of a field is chemistry.

[@MFEeee]

This is incredible. Finally know the categories of study that I favor. Thank you.

[@asadujjamannur101]

Great videos mate. Never seen anything so comprehensive on any topic let alone a subject like chemistry.

[@tristanpaulussen3356]

As a first year chemistry student this video is vastly inspiring me to start analysing the world around me and influence it in some shape or form. Very general and informative video!

[@IuriDiMaio]

I loved the videos about domains of Physics, Chemistry and Mathematics. Could you make a video about domains of Biology? It would be really cool to use in the classroom. :)

[@anggxyz]

Amazing video! The visuals and audio are crystal clear and easily understandable. Love the concept and really respect the efforts that must've gone behind making the video This might go against the name of the channel, but It would be great to see a similar map for world history 😅

[@hemasomaya5735]

This video is so easy to understand and the animation perfectly illustrates the information. Great work!

[@hannahdivic28]

LOVE this video! Thanks for helping reveal the connections between ideas and components of chemistry.

[@SaebaRyo21]

Sir, I m doing BSc chemistry honours and ur map of chemistry is really fascinating and adorable. Thanks a lot for summarizing the various sectors of chemistry in such a short time and in a very beautiful manner :)

[@abcxyz-el5xk]

Hey bro how is your degree going?

[@bazic2002WoT]

@@abcxyz-el5xk he’s probably graduated already

[@HassanAhmed-rf9xr]

@@bazic2002WoT with a master

[@anodiaaspirant5675]

Sm here 🙂

[@Abdd17]

@@HassanAhmed-rf9xr PhD now..

[@chaseobrien8721]

see, I have had so much trouble learning in the past because I I don't want to start at the bare minimum and slowly progress to bigger topics, I lose interest too quick. Getting huge outlines so I can see everything and knowing what IM fully getting into gives me the motivation I need to keep learning, Great videos man, please make more

[@waikikinz]

Being a Chemical Engineer, this kind of video speaks to me ! You hsould have more views ! Despite few mistakes, I really enjoyed watching it. Chemistry is life! You could have explained in a little more details about how we got all the elements starting from 2. That really amazes me every time :D Great video ! Keep on !

[@Paraselene_Tao]

These are absolutely great videos! I imagine these maps being made into a swf/flash file so you can explore the maps like the Scale of the Universe flash file!!!

[@zacharyhizon5165]

1. Map of Biology 2. Map of Social Sciences 3. Map of Engineering 4. Map of Computer Science I can't wait for all of them to be tied up into a single Map of Science. I love these videos!

[@lawnmower69]

Fascinating ! It's great to see this science stuff from above , things get clarified . Thank you

[@elizaclouds]

This video is amazing, you've earned yourself a subscriber! I'm getting ready to binge watch the whole channel

[@martinAcoustics12]

Are you planning on making a Map of Philosophy? All the videos in your maps series have immense value in helping us to understand the fundamentals, origins and development of all the subjects you have done so far and I am curious if you also interested and knowledgeable in philosophy?

[@sander_bouwhuis]

Like your mathematics map, this is absolutely fantastic! These posters should be in every class room.

[@user-nf9so5oa7w]

i love these maps you draw,good job

[@geoavanil7020]

Love what you do. Thank you for making these videos and sharing.

[@ZambarBaySiyah]

The Map of Biology next!!!!

[@TrangNguyen-cs6wv]

Bay Siyah Agree but not without appriation of this brilliant chemistry map we already watched here. :)

[@Shloopy420]

Physics -> Chemistry -> Biology!!!!! It must be coming up :)

[@Tethloach1]

Chemistry>Biology>Neurology >sociology>economics>politics>computer science> virtual reality>reality building.

[@oioikevin8369]

psychology next!!! Oh wait this channel is called the science domain

[@josepalma694]

Bay Siyah bbborma m.kzbin.info/www/bejne/mWmUd2ejgsRqsK8 m.kzbin.info/www/bejne/mWmUd2ejgsRqsK8 m.kzbin.info/www/bejne/mWmUd2ejgsRqsK8 m.kzbin.info/www/bejne/mWmUd2ejgsRqsK8 m.kzbin.info/www/bejne/mWmUd2ejgsRqsK8

[@dingdong9718]

My science teacher recommended this video to my class, and I'm happy I actually chose to watch this. It gave me a bit of a bigger perspective! Fingers crossed that it goes well on the test too..

[@redpower6956]

Very informative, your videos are amazing! Keep doing these incredible videos.

[@neuromusk467]

dude you are doing some super duper high quality stuff out there ...keep going

[@DJ-ov2it]

Redox reaction... not heard that term in a long time, and Im happy about that.

[@theInternet633]

Map of computer science next?

[@auroranassif5509]

I am really happy now because I knew your channel. A simple explanation with an outstanding effort. Thx looking forward to seeing more chemistry videos.

[@johnswolter]

Excellent. Having science domain knowledge maps helps relate all disconnected required course knowledge splattered across textbooks from the 20th century. Your maps clears the air(chemistry, yes) for me. The map of mathematics helped me even though I've learned up to Calculus of Variations. Keep going! Haw about punching down into more subject detail of your existing maps?

[@rdnhansen]

Excellent. Thank you. I wish I had seen this in first-year chemistry! Although...I'm not sure consciousness is a function of physics, chemistry and biology. It might be the other way around. But that's philosophy for you.

[@tunisianfisherman3102]

all hail chemistry , may the knowledge of the nucleique acide be with you

[@add26mee]

By the quality of your work it seems you are already doing what you love to do...but catalyst of appreciation always enhances the good. So great work dude it just gives perspective and relevance to these otherwise mentally draining topics of comtemplation of life.......science...GOOD LUCK..

[@hughbroome2]

Your video is well done; I love how you tie together the concepts together. I think you have the reducing agent and oxidizing agent backwards at 4:49.

[@tibormalinsky8751]

In the video there’s only one sentence, that perfectly describes chemistry: “It’s so incredibly complicated.”

[@MathsWithMelv]

Loving the Breaking Bad inspired thumbnail! Respect the chemistry!

[@cybro8925]

I appreciate the corrections in the description!

[@autentyk5735]

I find it endlessly fascinating too. Great video.

[@ArhkXi]

[New Non-map video] Domain of Science Guy: Hey I made this cool not map based video!~ Everyone's response: Boo, do the map thing.

[@muazkashif8554]

Awesome video! Can we have a "Map of Biology" next?

[@feynstein1004]

Mako?

[@tacoexpressSEEDEEholeeveryones]

byawluhjee

[@thirunavukkarasua.2098]

Each and every area in chemistry in a few simple sentences- great video

[@sinuhearialdo]

Came back to this video years later, understanding a little bit more of chemistry and I love how everything makes more sense now! I can't wait until I glean some more understanding in this subject

[@tacoexpressSEEDEEholeeveryones]

you leave on a red cloth table lamp with a regular kind of bulb in the bedroom and an oval tubular vintage bulbed desk lamp on in the office next door. There's 1 lamp in each room. You wait to see which type of bulb burns out first, how long it takes and why. Would you consider this example to be doing a type of experiment?,

[@debabratakalita9947]

5:00 ERROR **** sodium is a reducing agent and chlorine is an oxidizing agent ****

[@ArchitheFA]

Nice video, but precipitation is not method of separating compounds by means of different evaporation temperature. That would be dry distillation. Plus chlorine in reaction with sodium is oxidizer (oxidizer - compound that receive electrons, and this is reduced)

[@yashikarathi1176]

Great Video! Chemistry is just a fantasy! All the way through this video, a smile was on my face, amazing work!!

[@hypercuriosity9828]

Really informative video.I am professor of chemistry at Harvard and am really impressed by the compactness with which this video introduced us to wonders of chemistry. It is the most beautiful subject I have known.

[@siaw0000]

Lol the part in the beginning about the formation of elements ("Billions of years ago, super giant stars fused the hydrogen and helium into all the other elements") reminds of the history of the entire world, I guess video ("And some stars burn out and die with passion and make some new, way crazier shit")

[@domainofscience]

I have learned a lot from Bill Wurtz.

[@TimmacTR]

This should be mandatory at the beginning of each school year..

[@TheUltimaxxxx]

TimmacTR Although it is important to make the students realise how important a subject is, such a lengthy discourse might discourage them from studying about it. don't get me wrong, I loved the video!

[@unitelanka]

i loved the video but it seems like a dry overview for a starting point. topics like biochemistry and molecular biology are a lot more interesting if students get to play around with some experiments as a starting point.

[@tacoexpressSEEDEEholeeveryones]

Category*

[@Indibhai123]

This is very helpful for me understanding many concepts thanks a lot for these video. I love this series of yours.

[@youtuberodriguez1407]

Favorite KZbin Channel HANDS DOWN!!!!!

[@mgoksoy]

I appreciate the way you have summarised the basic and essential sciences with graphics. I am a social scientist with a great curiosity, was feeling the deficiency of enough information in math, chemistry and physics. After watching your work in those subjects, I am feeling better. Many thanks.

[@gamefinity7568]

how was BSC Chem ??

[@aysion.2957]

I love learning about science the language of the universe

[@Byron3189]

really enjoyed this lay out with the animation, please do all you can with the sciences

[@ChouaibAHMANIFERDI]

Thank you for your efforts, it's really well made (y)

[@01111011111101etc]

Missing: Synthetic chemistry. Reaction mechanisms. Inorganic chemistry and geology connection.

[@docthorium1562]

Maybe you should do a map of science in general.

[@EletroSensor]

DocThorium A map of the hard sciences would indeed be appreciated.

[@justinmalik6977]

I bet your an early high school kid

[@docthorium1562]

Abhishek Mallik You are correct. Why do you mention it?

[@LIETUVIS10STUDIO1]

To put it simply, a map of science in general would end up beyond any reasonable scope of a 12 minute lenght video, unless heavy generalization is involved. Plus add that people tend to have arguments what is and isn't a science (as is currently the case with social sciences), so, yeah, it'd be impossible. It's best to just look at it one-by-one.

[@IWantToStayAtYourHouse]

A map of science.... That would be too long.

[@herbbuckland9223]

Wonderful. I could have listened to your presentation for hours.

[@lifenutribiz6220]

thank you for an informative presentation of chemistry, this will help me a lot

[@kklognve]

Это просто потрясно

[@tacoexpressSEEDEEholeeveryones]

you leave on a red cloth table lamp with a regular kind of bulb in the bedroom and an oval tubular vintage bulbed desk lamp on in the office next door. There's 1 lamp in each room. You wait to see which type of bulb burns out first, how long it takes and why. Would you consider this example to be doing a type of experiment?. : ;.

[@alexkorocencev7689]

which software do you use to create the maps?

[@aidanfuge2108]

Alex Korocencev I don't know what they use, but it looks like vectors, a free software for which is inkscape

[@johnrosenbaud7717]

have you found out?

[@aristoteles3843]

Aidan Fuge Yes but they also animate the art they made so they used a animation tool aswell

[@y.a.46]

Almost done with my masters in chemical engineering and I have to say this video does a good job of covering what you are going to study in chemistry. To me my favourite field is biochemistry, there is something magical about witnessing the incredible framework of chemical substances in living organisms and the fact that we are able to manipulate it (albeit slightly) is nothing short of a miracle.

[@tacoexpressSEEDEEholeeveryones]

you leave on a red cloth table lamp with a regular kind of bulb in the bedroom and an oval tubular vintage bulbed desk lamp on in the office next door. There's 1 lamp in each room. You wait to see which type of bulb burns out first, how long it takes and why. Would you consider this example to be doing a type of experiment?

[@aanchalthakur4296]

Just thought how much this man is hard working 👍👍keep it up

[@thankammajoseph4784]

A man walks into a bar and asks for H20.A second man behind him says I'll have H20 too . THE SECOND MAN DIES

[@starktony2665]

I guess most people who saw this comment didn't get it

[@thankammajoseph4784]

@@starktony2665 Ya ur right dude...

[@onlinelearningguide]

Amazing you tube channel!

[@tacoexpressSEEDEEholeeveryones]

OnlineLearningGuide you leave on a red cloth table lamp with a regular kind of bulb in the bedroom and an oval tubular vintage bulbed desk lamp on in the office next door. There's 1 lamp in each room. You wait to see which type of bulb burns out first, how long it takes and why. Would you consider this example to be doing a type of experiment?

[@amir-rc7mz]

Thanks for Domain of Science, I hope for more maps in teaching the complicated fields of science

[@shivikamal]

This thing up here is very efficient for revising your topics .

[@Daniel-Brous]

You shouldn't have called the bonding section bonding since you included inter molecular forces, which arent actually bonds. They're actually just forces that hold molecules in phase, not always single atoms. Bonds specifically hold seperate compounds together, and changing the bonds changes its chemical properties and shape, so bonding is very different from hydrogen bonding and van der waals forces

[@chemistrychannel5021]

Daniel Brous so let say connacting 😂 because they are stick together by intermolecular forces we can say bonding in our language but in scientific language it's wrong 😅✋

[@chaiinito9092]

almost 3 years of school in 12 minutes thx

[@illiak1085]

Thanks for creating these! Economics and engineering/manufacturing would be great to have i think

[@user-kp7sz8uu9t]

Thank you for high quality content!

[@lukeskywalker5109]

" We're all made of star stuff" -Carl Sagan

[@xkjjx]

No one noticed the confusing way he demonstrated Double Replacement reaction

[@soleilsun3469]

I love your videos, they are so informative. Can you do a map of economics or sociology, that would be amazing 😄

[@brainstormingsharing1309]

Absolutely well done and definitely keep it up!!! 👍👍👍👍👍

[@smper3570]

Do economics map or map of different political systems.

[@willj476]

astronomy maybe?

[@The.Talent]

Will John I imagine that map could be made to look pretty epic!

[@monkeyorful]

Will John I think astrology have a much more interesting map

[@ceskale]

monkeyo Archon what is this fake shit

[@youkaiyarn4848]

+monkeyo Archon From what I've seen of astrology, it's honestly far from scientific. Because of that, I doubt this channel would make a map of astrology.

[@monkeyorful]

Can I say something in my defence? It was a joke, a bad one ofc, the worse the most likely i am to do it, but still a joke. I know astrology is bullshit this is why i find it funny, nothing more, sry if I give a wrong impresion about myself.

[@Myfaceagain]

In my last 8 hours for my chemistry degree and I don't know why but this was like the coolest video I've ever seen just made me recollect on everything I learned such freaking ride man I'm gonna miss school

[@ramtrinathmajety9842]

If our school and college teachers also explain like this it will be great, yours a very great explanation sir. thanks for u r service.