The Missile That Could Save Taiwan From A Chinese Invasion

[@tomsmith2587]

Anything that can reach that giant dam will debilitate them.

[@pathat8869]

The Chinese response would result in taiwans infrastructure being damaged

[@limitlessLtd]

SHHHHH DONT TELL THEM

[@dandane5227]

I just need 2 packs of cigarettes and some dynamites

[@shannonkohl68]

1. attacking dams is against the Geneva convention I believe and 2. no reason to attack it. Tofu Dreg projects bomb themselves.

[@纪思豪]

why r u so cruel? 😂 No wonder US has so many enemies in this world. Because you guys are so cruel and heartless ..🤭🤭

[@justinwolf7490]

Keep building and sending them! 🇺🇸 🇹🇼

[@craigkdillon]

You don't mention the HF-2 and HF-2b anti-ship missiles from Taiwan. Taiwan has over 1,000 of them. The HF-2b is new, and just being produced now. Their range is 250km. Even if their ECCM is not as sophisticated, they will still be able to take out troop ships, and less well defended ships than the lead capital ships of the PLA Navy, which likely have good defenses. The 400 Harpoons Taiwan has can take those out.

[@hughmungus2760]

The war over taiwan will almost exclusively be an air and missile war. The US will not be able to generate meaningful CAP over taiwan due to the distance their planes need to travel while chinese aviation would mop up taiwan's air force and the PLARF would quickly degrade taiwan's military logistics with sustained strategic bombardment. the only naval assets used by china will be submarines which will lay mine around taiwan's ports and hunt the few sub taiwan has.

[@tkskagen]

I am so glad to see that the "Rockwell B1-B" is still in service! And,there is still a possibility that the B1-B could use this using its "rotisserie mount/launch" system given its size...

[@furiousscotsman2916]

No you are not lol, it needs retired it currently costs the US Airforce MORE per flight hour than a B2 Bomber.... roughly $170000 per hour which is why the US air-force has tried for years to retire them and wants them all gone by 2030 to be replaced by the B21.

[@sergejlavrov3446]

You must be a US transgender military brain? Am I right?

[@likemostthings]

and after it launches it's payload it can then make some chicken

[@kennethcatlett8347]

​@@furiousscotsman2916k9

[@troyezell5841]

The B-21 Raider is replacing the B1-B relatively soon. Edit: The B1-B is on its last leg.

[@etc6272]

The crazy part of this is that the information given is what they want us to know. There are top secret informations that the public doesn't know.

[@Daniel-i8u4l]

Right, it is secret information, and a mass majority of the population does not know one way or the other as to "who" or "where" that destructive missile or destructive force came from, if it wasn't just infrastructure failure anyway. I guess you just have to remain open to all you do not yet know.

[@robsonng9160]

it is also pure dumb thinking Taiwan could stop China

[@paulmurray8922]

Zaporizhia Oblast would be the perfect test range for a HIMARS launched version. 😄

[@dwwolf4636]

Too big.

[@dwwolf4636]

I'd see more usage for launching HARM and it's newer counterpart from ground launchers. Or perhaps stuff like Spear 3/Spear EW. More long range smart muntions to saturate air defense from the ground.

[@paulmurray8922]

@@dwwolf4636 What's too big?

[@pauldean8638]

Don’t worry Ukraine will use our storm shadow to create another Chernobyl , then kyiv gets tactically nuked . Then we get wiped out in the uk like they already told us by Poseidon attack , that what you want dumbass . Any nuke fallout is a direct threat on Russia , that means we a legit target . America will stand there saying “ well we wasn’t stupid to give them long range missiles , sorry your on your own “

[@bipash_9720]

Baby it's zaporizhizhia😂

[@manuelteixeira2496]

The JASSM-ER utilizes a turbofan engine similar to those found in tactical fighter planes, and has an internal structure that allows for additional fuel storage, increasing its range from around 230 miles to over 620 miles. The missile is guided by an internal inertial navigation and GPS unit for most of its flight, which was originally developed for weapons such as the AGM-154 Joint Standoff Weapon. Once the missile reaches its target, it switches to an infrared seeker for terminal guidance.

[@billcook7483]

The 'F15e' looked remarkably similar to an F16 to me .

[@Synfulz]

You would think they could distinguish between the 2.

[@Mediocre_JT]

That cruise missile looks tiny on that B1-B, just the warhead is 1000lbs. Wow

[@tHEHEAd1138]

And it can carry more than 20 of them! 🤓

[@jolivera8451]

24👌🏼and 20 for B-52 and B-2

[@Daniel-i8u4l]

@@tHEHEAd1138 Wow* 20 of them? Wow *!*

[@fcukrealmadrid]

anti aircraft carrier one can be heavier or just saturation attack

[@Villain1874]

Hopefully this missile will make an appearance in Ukraine - wouldn’t be fair for Storm Shadow to have all the fun - 🇬🇧🇺🇸🇺🇦

[@matthewmuise5138]

lmao ur dreaming if u thing they will get this

[@thecatthinks]

I don't give a shit about Ukraine.

[@qwertyqwerty-zi6dr]

Neah those advanced weapons are meant to destroy the China s PLA, Ukraine can fight with Russia with older stuff

[@vlhc4642]

​@@qwertyqwerty-zi6dr Storm Shadow is newer than JASSM.

[@qwertyqwerty-zi6dr]

@@vlhc4642 kinda same age, but I m talking about Us weapons, I don t think UK will rly helpt Taiwan, but who knows

[@larryc1616]

Taiwan needs 2 lines of defense. The first deterrent is to buy 100 F-35's. The second line or permanent deterrent are 2 nuclear armed subs. ❤🇺🇲🇹🇼

[@Trust_but_Verify]

Too expensive to buy/maintain plus crew. Better have more anti-ship and-air missiles, sea mines.

[@CloningIsTooGoodForSheep]

The deal between India and Taiwan which allows the Taiwanese to produce Brahmos missiles shouldn't be overlooked.

[@gups4963]

Their various type anti ship missiles are the whole point of what Taiwan is doing. Oversaturation with Subsonic dated Harpoon missiles, subsonic steath Lrassm, Brahamos and the various missiles Taiwan made will make shooting down most of them nearly impossible

[@borisreljanovic7292]

Cullen does the deal exist?

[@J_X999]

I really don't think Brahmos missiles will be able to do nearly as much as Chinese or US missiles.

[@lethalhands7497]

@@J_X999 no , it is capable. India is Continuously working to improve it.

[@J_X999]

@@lethalhands7497 Then again, the USA and China also continuously work on their missiles to the same extent.

[@shad118]

The US needs to give Taiwan access to their nuclear weapons

[@JoeyBlogs007]

I had been thinking about a flapless design, by using manoeuvrable weights inside the missile's structure. Possibly also useful for a hypersonic missile design.

[@DriveLaken]

Imagine 45 B-1 and 21 B-2 taking off from the USA, carrying 24 and 20 LRAS each. 1,080 and 420 = 1,500 of those things hitting 1,500 different targets. Hope China doesn’t do it

[@SukKennedy]

America has some if not all of the best weapons and defense systems, but don't be misled to believe that China is far behind on their war machines! It's not something to find out in an all out war!

[@andrevandiggelen-bg5fz]

Jeeze. I really wanted to hear that production was stepped up to 5000 a year. 😢

[@justinwolf7490]

It’s coming we just need to keep producing and shipping them! 🇺🇸 🇹🇼

[@vlhc4642]

You're gonna have to, because Chinese industry can literally pump out 1,000 missiles a day when mobilized.

[@jdluntjr76226]

That doesn’t include rapid dragon where cargo planesl such as the C130 and C17 can deploy them on palletized system - essentially turning them into bombers and Taiwan has some c-130s

[@TomSwartz-sv1fp]

I think LM had better get more production capabilities fast. The US needs 4 times as many as we have for starters. Let's try to boost that production up to 500 per month.

[@edwardbrown5389]

If the rapid dragon works the war is over in one hour

[@hughmungus2760]

no, it turns into an attrition war where chinese rockets fired from trucks on the mainland shell the crap out of taiwan for months while the US can't find or hit these rocket launchers hiding inside cities and forests.

[@Daniel-i8u4l]

Fut The Wuk is "rapid dragon"? The readers want to know!

[@hughmungus2760]

@@Daniel-i8u4l its the idea of dumping missiles out the back of cargo planes. A dumb idea cause those cargo planes would be seen 1000km away by AWACs and shot down by chinese stealth fighters.

[@jamarplunkett3283]

The Jassm XR has a range of 1800 kilometers, making this point mute. And there are cargo planes always flying, so how do you differentiate between regular cargo and rapid dragon? Because sending out stealth fighters every time a cargo plane flys, doesn’t really work.

[@cosmicwakes6443]

How can a country possibly invade itself?

[@TheBlackManMythLegend]

if it's the same country they do not need to invade and destroy everything.

[@michaellee401]

It's actually 2 different countries... but you can view them as Chinese civil war that never did end. 1 is communist China; the other being R.O.C Taiwan.

[@Elucidator-]

Found the CCP troll.

[@EddieRicks-i8v]

I wish our government would keep numbers and capabilities to themselves 🙃

[@JBsC6]

Good to know . Thanks for posting up.

[@amitkamalsharma1305]

Nothing just propaganda of USA Why this missile is not given to Ukraine

[@isobutylquinoline]

Launches JAASM

[@jukio02]

You forget that China is not a third world country, they have technology that will be able to counter these things, like fighter jets.

[@ronmaximilian6953]

We are not producing anywhere near enough. Perhaps we should see if Australia would like to a production line and we build a third one here. Perhaps we would have one dedicated for the LRASM in the US.

[@frenchimp]

You mean we aren't...

[@JSharap]

Ozzies spend more time either surfing or sunbathing...they don't even have a heavy manufacturing mindset like Russia or China.

[@Bazball1080]

How many are needed to take out an aircraft carrier? Let’s yes it’s 10. The Chinese only have two carriers, so that’s a lot of missiles being produced each year to take out their main ships

[@ronmaximilian6953]

It would be nice to have at least one for every ship in the People's Liberation Army Navy and their Coast guard which contains many military ships. It'll also be useful to have some for the civilian roll on roll off ships which would be used in an invasion. Obviously, some of the larger targets would need more than one missile but there are others that aren't worth a missile. The promise that everyone assumes that China couldn't shoot any of these down. They have air board early warning and control aircraft with L-band phased array radars. They have drones with the same types of radars. And they have fighter aircraft with X-Band AESA radars They have destroyers and cruisers with dual band AESA radars. Stealthy me a souls can be detected at close ranges and some are going to be shot down

[@karlwu2244]

"Could have, should have." I should have won the damn Power Ball yesterday.

[@veljkoventola2097]

Yes, thats it, now the Taiwan is saved...😂😂😂

[@nick066hu]

Funny how the missile wears a 'mask' at 3:51 and in the next cut the two guys are also in masks.

[@CD318]

Great video--ty for posting.

[@tomc5803]

Here we are still making subsonic missiles and try to make them sound scary. They will be very easy to shoot down because they are much too slow. We need to make our new missiles hyper sonic. Sub sonic missiles are what we had over 30 years ago. Evidently our defence subcontracters aren't smart enough to make modern missiles.

[@tmr626]

If the Chinese Navy invades Taiwan there's another bomb they could use called the "Quicksink." The Quicksink is dropped beside the vessel and it explodes under the hull instantly breaking the ship in two. They could probably use 5000 to 10,000 pound plus Quicksinks to bust the Chinese aircraft carriers in two.

[@aleksandarstix3097]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@hughmungus2760]

First you have to get within a few km of a chinese ship to do that. Good luck when you've got hundreds of chinese fighters and land based SAMs covering.

[@Clairemont7893]

The Chinese have Thier own so call quick sink and they have a unsinkable based. Near by it's name main land China

[@jukio02]

China has an air force you know and long range missiles, they aren't are third world country like Iraq.

[@Mrpaulgs]

I think they should change the name to "Joint Insertion at Surface Standoff Missle - Extended Range" or JISMM-ER for short.

[@orlandoboiebernadas6741]

God bless America, Nato and the Allied forces...

[@Arturo-lapaz]

The invasion fleet will litter the sea bottom.

[@loadingnewads]

Subsonic missile…this already determined everything It can’t penetrate the defense system of Chinese warships

[@edgar.n]

Just always keep in mind. If they say they will have 500 of these bad boys thay means they already have 500 of them lol they will never tell you how many they truly have

[@seshasaivenkat]

same confidence Ukraine had with NATO weapons but we know what is the current situation

[@Apophis1010]

The B1B Lancer is a gorgeous aircraft. The pilots must love their job

[@jackattack2608]

The first sign that hostilities are started by China will be hundreds, maybe thousands, of missiles striking Taiwan (beside cyber attacks). Buildings, infrastructure, military targets and missile silos will be prime targets. If the US is going to use long range missiles to sink the Chinese fleet, then Taiwan needs a different strategy. They need thousands of hidden missiles capable of knocking down large, inner city buildings and factories all over China. If they hit a hundred cities with a hundred bombs there will be nothing left of Chinese manufacturing for years to come. That will be the price of knocking down Taiwan. Russia is doing a huge number on Ukraine without any reciprocal damage. China should not escape the same fate as Taiwan. China will threaten nuclear war, just like Russia but they are way more vulnerable to that than Russia.

[@garyleonard8495]

If this Missile is so good why are we not making tens of thousands of them. If there's a war we will need everyone of these missiles we can get our hands on.

[@vlhc4642]

You're not winning a missile production fight with China, for that matter you're not winning a production fight of anything with China. If you find yourself needing numbers, you've already lost.

[@irfanrehman4778]

Taiwan against china? Anyone who compare China vs Taiwan needs to get their head checked.

[@vladimirkozak7057]

Neexistuje způsob, jak vyprovokovat Číňany k obsazení Taiwanu. Polovina Taiwanců Číně fandí a je otázkou času, kdy se přidají další. Zvláště teď, když USA začínají Taiwanu škodit a vyhrožovat zničením továren po Čínském útoku.

[@markmilan57]

Good for additional purchase and it fits well on c140s as well!

[@Arturo-lapaz]

C-130

[@joseolivarra7791]

Sounds like 30 thousand chinese troops at the bottom of the taiwan straight is gonna be a problem ❤❤❤❤❤

[@J_X999]

Pipe dreaming lil bro

[@johnwesterh3313]

Let Taiwan defend itself. Most Americans don’t want us involved

[@bigviper64]

Sweden and Norway have excellent Anti-Ship missiles..if the US purchases a good amount from both countries, we should be in good shape.

[@markmilan57]

Sure I will put this proposal in President's desk. He will sign it before he leaves the house.

[@regolith1350]

3:25 FYI that's an F-16, not an F-15.

[@pauldean8638]

Are you messing , China just sink your fleet . Before some clown says they can’t then watch your admiral in the senate “ grifters in the pentagon “ . This missile programme got dropped didn’t it

[@polo-kf6yh]

Is this the same one that failed in Ukraine? Your story.

[@FunfusionDas]

Super deadly weapon 💪👍

[@djjohnpiazza7043]

amazing video btw...quality

[@pezpengy9308]

arent these the things theyre using with rapid dragon?

[@gups4963]

Yes

[@tHEHEAd1138]

I have 2 questions. First, are either of these weapons nuclear capable? And second, what does carrying a stealth weapon like LRASM externally on the F35 do to the stealth characteristics of the jet? If anyone knows, I'd appreciate the answer. Thanks! 🤓

[@painthuret]

It will obviously compromise the plane's stealth capabilities. This is one of the reason why the NGAD program is being developed as the added external fuel reservoirs were also compromising the purpose of the F35 and F22's stealth capabilities as the new pacific theater will require more range

[@drunkdriver]

There's really no need to strap this to an f35 as it's main role is to identify targets. Leave the missile trucking to bombers and f15s.

[@SukKennedy]

Stealth is mainly achieved by the top layer of planes so missles and some bombs that are external don't do much to effect it, because they're under the wings! Most radar systems will not detect it until it's to late, meaning they'd only detect when in close proximity. Btw not sure about your 1st quest., but would think one if not both would be capable!

[@tHEHEAd1138]

@@SukKennedy Thank-you! 🤓

[@tHEHEAd1138]

@@drunkdriver I agree. I only ask because they mentioned plans to do so in the video.

[@eymeeraosaka2954]

Is the JASSM-ER another wonder weapon only the US has? This is just an ordinary air-launched cruise missile with a range of about 400km designed for stationary ground target. I would say the Tomahawk cruise missile with a range of 1000km is even more potent, especially launched from a submarine except that both are sub-sonic missiles. How do they compare with the Chinese hypersonic missiles with ranges of 1000km to 3000km? US bombers will be shot down before they even have a chance to launch the cruise missiles...

[@Daniel-i8u4l]

How do you know?

[@eymeeraosaka2954]

@@Daniel-i8u4l Google my friend...Is so simple thanks to Jeff Bezos...

[@3zea-un7do]

Yes indeed Tomahawks for deep strike with 2,400km range, but Taiwan is already a formidable force JASSM ER, LRASM is a force multiplier that will swarm or overwhelm Chinese this munitions is considered drones loitering munitions with 1000lbs explosives and can be carried by cargos C130s C5s C17s palletised munitions which Taiwan has C130s can carry up to 18 cruise missiles plus Taiwan's F-16s and other tactical fighters, though Taiwan has lots of standoffs missiles like South Korea Popeye's missiles, SLAM ER missiles, JDAM kits plus Taiwan's domestic built long range supersonic cruise missiles for deep strike with 1000km range with all precisions, I bet Chinas Xi will scream out loud 90% of China's Naval fleet will be destroyed in the first salvos in the event of major conflict between Taiwan and Chinas PLA and BTW I wasn't able to include Japan which they would intervene and will be on Taiwan's side if a major conflict with China and yes US defense already acknowledged Chinas long range hypersonic missiles DF-21 or DF-17 which they've seen evidence via satellite imegary which flew straight to its target across Mongolia, however US withdrew from INF treaty with Russia during trump's administration, US has its own operational hypersonic missile but wouldn't consider as a true hypersonic missiles LRHW with a range of 1000km with C-HGB warhead this missile is considered to be intermediate range with a range of 4000km+ the warhead is considered (MaRV) Maneuvering re-entry vehicle like those of Pershing ll's this will be operated by US army and plans to be deployed on a Zumwalt destroyers the US still various arsenal such as LRSO and defense contractors are still working on HGV hypersonic glide vehicle and HCM hypersonic cruise missiles which will be strap by f-15 EX named HAWC as they considered true hypersonic missiles

[@draigygoch]

F15 E looks incredibly similar to an F16 C...hmmm...mightr have to brush up on my recce skills

[@RunplaysinHD]

The only thing that could save Taiwan is NATO membership, the sooner the better. THe world must show China its place

[@octowuss1888]

Guarantee WW3 more like. Christ, the number of dumb warhawks in the world at the moment is just fucking crazy.

[@FXGreggan.]

Unfortunately NATO doesn't operate in the pacific... tho imho NATO should be rebranded to let countries like Australia, NZ, Japan, Taiwan etc could join if they want to..

[@EastWest-yr2xy]

Some people are good at telling jokes.

[@iqbal1569]

03:26 This is F 16, not F 15 e. 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

[@mikebuck1897]

You are correct.

[@rolandeyezz]

This is really funny 🤣 So, the Chinese wouldn't have counter measures?

[@recoil53]

Maybe, but it's not automatically a given.

[@qwertyqwerty-zi6dr]

We will see

[@vlhc4642]

@@recoil53 You should look up China's CH-805 target drone, they literally practice against targets far more stealthy than JASSM. Also for context, one of the tests every Chinese destroyer have to pass before entering service is to simultaneously defeat 8x incoming supersonic sea-skimming ASMS target drones appearing at horizon range, at subsonic speeds with 3x more reaction time you're going to need to throw at least 30x JASSM at each ship just to replicate the same test conditions they passed.

[@recoil53]

@@vlhc4642 "far ore stealthy" and yet China's "stealth" jet has a large RCS of 0.1 m^2. Odd set of priorities.

[@aaronseet2738]

3:26 That's a small-looking F-15...

[@pj_ytmt-123]

These things probably cost in excess of $10M each. Still a pretty small price tag compared to the cost of a fully armed chinese destroyer.

[@RobWalters-w7x]

Wow that’s a lot of ship killers

[@paulmurgatroyd6372]

For many decades now, the USA, especially the military, has been suffering from acronym fatigue. Hopeless jumbles of letters and numbers, introduced by disgruntled members of military command, in order to cripple the fighting forces with mentally and physically wearying nomenclature. During World War 2, in an effort to stave off this nonsense, it was decreed by the cigar and pipe smokers in Whitehall that this would not be allowed to take hold in the UK, with masses of US equipment coming in. Thus the names of tanks and aircraft were given sensible names that normal people can remember, because you can't call absolutely everything "M1".

[@EdMcF1]

5:05 An expensive way to take out one container.

[@robertcollins403]

The question is. With out American Forces, what's happening to others Contries they're need help.? Thanks to others Coutries for working 💪 together ❤ with US Forces to help other Countries they need help.

[@DuraiarasanSundaramoorthy]

Assemble QUAD Wargame of Nuclear submarines near Taiwan, pass UN general assembly resolution for Taiwan recognition and make it a Sovereign Nation.

[@jdluntjr76226]

China has veto power in the UN Security Council meaning nothing will happen in the UN

[@glenngordon846]

Well that's all well and good but his suggestion how about doubling the size of the warhead we put on these missiles cruise missiles and hypersonic missiles. If you pay an attention the Chinese have been developing a long-range cruise missiles to decapitate our strike ability by blowing up aircraft carriers their missile has like a two and a half thousand pound warhead we have nothing like that, and the Russians go about things from the same way of thinking there's nothing they build that isn't bigger and heavier than the United States that includes the WarHeads on their missiles on their missile frigates, we need to add more firepower more punch

[@davidlarondelle2326]

They are based on customer demand? Ok, I'll take one of each.

[@ajm2872]

Let's RapidDragon like 50 of these into every chinese port.

[@johndickson435]

Had Taiwan received any of these or have they even ordered any ?

[@Daniel-i8u4l]

Shhh*...

[@AllenHChang]

We're drooling, but Biden does not budge😢

[@walterrumohr7090]

How many more to destroy humanity. Elon please hurry up to conquer Mars. 😂

[@onebridge7231]

Ukraine Russian war should have taught America 3,650 missiles is just not enough for these high intensity wars. They need 36,500 plus!

[@fredhunter7129]

I think the us would need three times the amount of these weapons like about 15000 of them

[@mithileshjha2561]

Possible, Smallest Ants Can kill to Bigger Elephant.

[@henryjohnson280]

The Chinese Kuomintang invaded Taiwan, with massive help from the U.S. Navy, in 1949. It's way too late to save it now!

[@Thuan_1803]

If the US upgrades these AGM 158 missiles to a speed of Mach 5 or higher, the US already has a hypersonic missile with high flexibility and great destructive power.

[@cynical45]

Good overview. Wish that Ukraine already had these weapons.

[@lingth]

Why do ppl think a country of 23 million population, and a defence budget of a 19.1 billion USD can deter a country with 1.4 billion and a defence budget of many times greater from invading? China has so many other ways of hurting Taiwan, just check how much Business does taiwanese have in China, in terms of imports and exports.. not just in food, and other manufactured or semi-manufactured goods.

[@johnsmith1953x]

*NO* There is no missile to save Tainwan. There are ALREADY 20 million PLA in Taiwan as we speak. Figure it out.

[@Thuan_1803]

perhaps calling the AGM 158 the most dangerous missile in the world is not wrong because they have a long range, great destructive power and stealth... But the greatest strength of this missile is that they can be launched from any airship American aircraft carrier with the Rapid Gagon launch system.

[@90330]

I have something similar on the roof of my car for transporting skis and other shit. Made by some swedish company.

[@georgewashington938]

the jizum missle would be effective against china

[@genewaller1002]

This missle is all smoke and mirrors. Let's talk about the zero gravity missle that can travel over 13k miles p/hr.

[@jdogdarkness]

All they have to do is integrate LRASM with M61 rocket motor for HIMARS use. Just like GLSDB.

[@oklahoma1232]

China PRC has millions of these LRSM for saturation attacks dropped from these delivery systems

[@Phil-D83]

Russian made missile defense systems would give it a run for its money

[@larrylem3582]

They're slow, not stealthy, and expensive.

[@Prolovacate]

I bet CCP would not dare to take Taiwan by forces because PLA forces are not capable of executing such impossible task without suffering massive casualties across the Taiwan Strait. They just could not do it, at least not in the next decade. Just remember, peace through strength and war through weakness.

[@rmcgraw7943]

It’s been tested on the SR-72 as well.

[@dad-ms8mz]

in what way its superior to bromosh or zircon or scalp?

[@Kawaii_Boy3]

Мне нравится B-1 Lancer, он красивый

[@xrpbluemarvel2566]

If they brought back the f111 can you us these

[@unclechico5981]

Awesome 👍

[@seanchang1202]

“That could save” only sustain when US willing to sell them.

[@dctranberg1]

You forgot to mention "dragons teeth" cargo plane deployment

[@Milleniumlance]

Rapid dragon 🐉

[@gang4001]

A 1 million dollar missile that effectively destroy a ship worth hundreds of millions? Seems worth it. Do they really worth as described though? Maybe some real combat testing in Ukraine is needed. I don't think everyone is 100% sold on them

[@kingb3]

I guess less than nothing was learned from Ukraine. Oh well I guess the Jassy is a wonder weapon now 🤣

[@prepperdan]

Just like the missile, the name is also long range