The MOST COMMON LEAK In Poker???

💸 Get 1 Month Carrot Corner Subscription when you buy CASH INJECTION for just £99.99 this July: 👉 carrotcorner.com/cash-injection/
🖥️ Get 3 Months Carrot Corner Subscription when you pick up Grade 1 of the Carrot Poker School this July: 👉 carrotcorner.com/carrot-poker...
🎓 Get 6 MONTHS FREE Subscription when you pick up the Full Carrot Poker School this July: 👉carrotcorner.com/carrot-poker...
📜 Video Description 📜
Poker is a game that requires you to be in the right mode of thought. The poker leak we discuss today's cash game poker video is perhaps the most widespread poker mistake possible and it's one I observe in every poker student and even in my own poker game. We might not be able to cure this poker mistake overnight but we can take significant strides by becoming aware of it. In this video we analyse some 100 Rush and Cash hands from GG Poker. In some of these cash game hand reviews I manage to avoid the leak but in the last hand of the video it causes me to make a PUNT!

[@bigenglish22]

I think "leek" would have been a better title, coupled with a follow up masterclass on vegetable-themed poker exploits (I have already patented this👀) Missed opportunity ☹

[@mikaeus468]

Phil Helmuth eat your heart out

[@jrm8206]

Would be cool to see some content on reg tables where there are some table dynamics.

[@MaydayAggro]

I am afraid of not having donuts.

[@KB-313]

Birds aren't real

[@lbooget]

Very good vid, wedded Pete comes back stronger, congrats! Loved the examples on this topic, well picked to illustrate the modes

[@blazeron12]

I've done cash injections and am now working on Grade E. Best courses I've ever taken as an already winning player.

[@Alexandertygreat]

Brilliant video mate, the best video you have made in awhile. Cheers

[@SultanOfSwings]

thank you carrot guy!!!! you the best around, no one's ever gonna keep you down!

[@TheMeathead07]

Do you have any jam bluffs on the AJJK boat hand? If so what?

[@bebla8381]

On the AA hand what about min check-raising and fold to a jam?

[@1to1IELTS]

The VPIP stats on GG are such trash - no way someone is limp opening 43s and VPIPing at 12%.

[@akorthouwer]

hmm he may just have started playing in the room the ggpoker stats are renewed after every session.

[@1to1IELTS]

@@akorthouwer obviously this could be the case, but it surprises me the number of players with these kind of stats and these kind of plays I see on GG all the time.

[@jayjaybwoyxx]

Love the aj hand, would you play it the same way on stream?

[@zero_zero107]

whatabout check raising in the AJ hand?

[@toineb777]

**drumroll ** True EV.

[@canadianbakn]

On the AdJs river jam versus check spot I would have liked some discussion on a smaller bet, say 15 or 20bb into 32bb. This bet size was my first instinct because I thought population might not defend versus this sizing often enough and bet/fold might show better EV than jamming. Am I really off in that assumption and do you think the jam is generating a lot more fold equity, enough that it's higher EV?

[@pierrearr]

15bb sizing especially is often getting called by any pair. It's much worse than checking. A shove is folding out even some Tx.

[@JankyJimmy]

The poker coaching GOAT 🐐 is back 🔥

[@kevdawg55]

Damn Pete thanks for the childhood saga

[@luke2017]

Damn dude that drink of water analogy really hit me. Edit: Also making that sandwich.

[@jonathanhenderson9422]

That AJ hand... I know it got through, but I'm not optimistic about that play unless I'm against someone who will overfold Tx and underpairs here. Against any kind of thinking player you've checked the turn (an uncommon play for anyone with overpairs or a flush on that board) and have a ton of bluff candidates with all the whiffed overcards and Ax suited. Maybe I'm wrong but it seems hard for you not to overbluff there, and I'm probably never folding a T or an underpair unless I'm against someone whom I've labeled as passive and who underbluffs.

[@RhysDavies2000]

I totally agree, any thinking player would understand it’s very unlikely hero would lead the flop then check the turn with a flush. I’m trying to think of combos that would take this line, especially with the 3bet from the BB. Because we almost never have 33 and 22. I guess we have some TT that checks turn for fear of flush and then jams river with full house but otherwise not too many value hands take this line

[@jonathanhenderson9422]

@@RhysDavies2000 In theory I'm guessing some of the overpairs that don't need protection like AA and KK, and some flush combinations are checking the turn, some of them looking to check/jam. You're supposed to check more frequently out of position so you can't make your checking range too weak. However, that's theory. I'd be surprised if most people aren't overbetting and underchecking their strong hands here, and if I'm villain and have any pair I'm assuming hero has too many bluff candidates to control frequency. Now, maybe Pete doesn't, and you do need some bluffs to counter those times you have a flush/overpair and miss your check/jam opportunity on the turn, but I really don't love AJ as you're blocking villains easy Ax folds that got sticky on a high-low-low flop.

[@best7993]

Poahh.. lookin good my brother with the beard and the watch. Thanks for the vid legend

[@KB-313]

very good stuff sir, ty

[@BenaBadBeatPoker]

benababby enjoyed this video

[@CarrotCornerPoker]

Infants shouldn’t be watching

[@HarryMTG]

Great video 🔥

[@animaroku]

If you need to go all in for the value hand, because there are enough calls, why would you go all in for the bluff instead of pot or a bit overbet? Besides balance, which is probably not something you aspire in 100nl. I think you have to compare jam to 40bb in the case of the bluff, and it is worse. I don't think you get 20% more folds for the jam, or even close for it to be the correct play

[@nickcheah6254]

Liked this one vm. My friend who is Poker-uninitiated also found it very interesting, as your insights highlight how poker as a game resembles life in a broader sense, and this sparked a sense of elegance and curiosity for her. What you tackle with (when you talk about the interview and water), which was right up my street, is known as ‘Occasion Setting’ in general psych but neuro- and behavioural psychology in particular. It underpins complex learning processes in organisms that simpler models can’t account for. I did a module for which this was the centre-piece topic a few years ago back in my uni days. Perhaps the analogy could be extended past the ‘drinking water because thirsty’ being dichotomously appropriate in one case but entirely inappropriate in the other, to a case whereby the selection of drink between water coffee beer or coke could be the framing of various poker actions being comparable in terms of EV and EVR based on circumstance. GTO solver has that theory hammered out, but of course in continuity with your previous content and repeated messages surrounding true EV and the real ‘world’ we are in, a choice of beer over water might be relatively higher EV in one poker spot/a party vs another one/the office. I loved the psychiatric comparisons in this one too, naturally, and funnily enough, I think by your exploring of poker issues you are addressing the logic of many issues in everyday cognition/thinking and clinical topics in parallel, which is what perhaps framed the mental health analogy to be so apt and astute. I thought about similar reciprocity between poker and IRL thinking when I watched the video you did with the mental coach. Honestly if it’s something you think would be worthwhile and of value, I’d love to talk about this side of things with you further. You already arrived at occasion setting, which is actually quite an obscure and complex psychological/science topic, by your work in poker coaching, so it would be great to explore what more ground could perhaps be covered. So though I may be a nobody on yt commenting, plz consider this an invite/request to discuss.

[@michaelfuhrmann3049]

This is from that and not that when this is there

[@moistflops6283]

i think this beard puts about 20 years on you

[@paulbae1273]

i cant agree with q9 h.

[@michaelfuhrmann3049]

Very colourful

[@whereismymind1]

soo meditation is the answer, more attuned to our bullshit i guess.

[@BenRickert88]

this is the OBESE BEAST!

[@johngriller4997]

I don’t mind the AA hand at all vs a rec. They have no concept of relative hand strength, so going for thin value against them is the way to go. Their bet size almost always equals hand strength, something you say. And they just need any reason to call u down like not believing you (something you also say). So, giving them a specific range that they’re gonna bet call and removing all the stupid nonsense they have like Qx and every single Kx combo for literally no reason (yes, they have AK here a lot lol), is very narrow minded thing of you to do. And also goes against your own teachings. This is a clear leak you have of contradicting yourself in these post game videos, Pete. Your in game self seems to execute better the things you teach than your post game self, in order to make a point, perhaps. Don’t be results oriented bc you ran bad there mate!

[@jonathanhenderson9422]

AK limp/calling pre? I'm with Pete, I don't think much Kx sticks around on the flop, not enough to make jam better than call, and I don't think Qx is bet/calling enough either. Could be wrong, of course.

[@CarrotCornerPoker]

The problem is the huge lack of worse hands bet/calling that node. Your logic is usually sound but in that spot I still think it’s an example of the over-generalising leak. As for the idea that I execute better in game than out of game, I hard disagree!

[@johngriller4997]

@@CarrotCornerPoker Again, you’re projecting your own thought process into what a fish’s range should look like, instead of what it actually looks like. If they have 43s, then they can have anything preflop, including every single suited Kx, or even AK as i already mentioned. Depending how the fish plays postflop, they will either overfold all their trash plus natural floats like AK, KJs, KTs, or they will over float everything to try and outplay you. If he’s the latter, he can even be betting AQ for thin value thinking he has the best hand with that action sequence and then press call button vs raise not believing you. And he can also even turn weaker Qx and below into bluffs and call u down anyway vs the raise bc, again, they just have to not believe you to press the call button. The trick is identifying what kind of fish they are. Without that read, it’s hard to say whether this was a bad play or not with the AA. But against fish and specifically vs their small sizings, this is at least ok. Can never be that bad. A slight mistake at worst, even vs the passive ones.

[@johngriller4997]

@@jonathanhenderson9422 ofc! They don’t know what they’re doing so they will play AK like this fairly often. Seems like you guys don’t have much experience playing vs recs lol. Stop playing vs regs and nitty shitregs all the time and you’ll quickly see what I’m talking about 🤣 The way to maximize vs whales is by going ultra thin for value. Even 2nd top kicker can be triple barreled for smaller sizes vs some whales. You guys are too nitty in general vs them. Leaving tons of TrueEV on the table 😉 That’s why, Game selection ftw beiiibiiii

[@jonathanhenderson9422]

@@johngriller4997 I mostly play live these days, but even in my years playing online I don't know if I ever saw limp/calling with AK. The rarity of the play combined with the fact there's only 6 possible combos dramatically reduces the probability of him having that, and calling with Kx high on the flop isn't common among recs either. Yes, tripling with TP2K can be a valid strategy against calling stations playing a way too wide range pre-flop. The situation here is very different, though.