The Most Terrifying “Number” Scientists Don’t Even Want To Talk About

[@keithwalmsley1830]

I never understand the concept of the biggest number possible, I mean couldn't you just add one to it???? 🤣

[@maltsutty]

Like those bastards on the price is right who add one cent 😂

[@youtubebane7036]

That's why the real numbers are uncountable because unlike the natural numbers and rational numbers which are all whole numbers and fractions and only positive for the natural, the real number is also include decimals and that is where the fun starts because you start counting decimal places in between whole numbers you find out there's an infinite number of them and the entire real number line is completely uncountable because of this.

[@ryanbrunson5764]

Sorry your out of numbers gotta start adding letters😂

[@davenchop]

@@maltsutty thats a pisser

[@peanutbutterjellyjam2179]

They probably haven't heard of infinity.

[@AnimaMundi641]

Looks like Buzz Lightyear was right all along...

[@ianclark9297]

I thought Carl Sagan defined it as a googleplex, which 10 raised to the power of 100 raised to the power of 100.

[@ShawnReed-h9z]

So that statement about Zeno's Paradox... doesn't take into account that division of space cannot actually be done infinitely. Eventually, you'll achieve the point where 'half' has reached the planck length, and cannot be further subdivided meaningfully with relation to distance. Certainly, the amount of planck lengths between a person and wall is incalculably large, but it's countably infinite; there's a number of vast proportion that could represent it. Just as you can't have zero-point division in a spatial sense; you'd need to draw a line between any two planck points for a 'slice' of something; the amount of possible non-parallel lines through a given point is again incalculably vast, but assuming a boundary to the meaning of time within the universe, an ever-inflating countable infinite number of planck lengths from one edge of the universe to the other in x, y, and z dimensions ('only' 5.5x10^61 planck lengths in the universe end to end, estimated, compared to tree(3) with its 2^^1000), you've got a non-infinite number representing the amount of ways any given point can be divided meaningfully in a spatial sense. In that we all move at the speed of C mostly through the axis of time but more considerably through space than one might expect, crossing the distance of many planck lengths to a wall over a countably infinite number of half-distances which can't divide below the planck length doesn't take very much time. We don't get there as fast as light, but we do cross a countably infinite amount of planck-space in mere seconds.

[@Anthony-ru7sk]

All that dirty talk getting me hot and sweaty

[@TheUrantiaBook]

Now have everything you said plus 1. 😂

[@drcentertainment4756]

As far as we're concerned, space is limitless! Who knows whats beyond the observable universe and beyond that?!

[@rockNrolla130]

Infinity is theoretical...

[@stevendeschamps3892]

@@rockNrolla130 no its real, that's like saying addition is theoretical. All we have to do is define a thing and poof it now exists. Infinity is tricky because it is not static. every other number is static (except numbers like Pi or 10/3 = 3.333333333333333333333333333333333 to infinity. Numbers like these have motion to them, their value seems to move but the majority of numbers approach or are equal to a limit (see Calculus) unless it increases to infinity. Infinity should not be called a number it is something else, like zero we can define it with words more easily than with other numbers. I'd say zero is the conceptual opposite of infinity, I could be the first person to proclaim that, time to google it.

[@krumplethemal8831]

Is this the pothagrius problem? They feared letting the concept of zero out.

[@Gemini_Samura1]

I need about Tree.Fity...

[@azerdraco3146]

Dam ol' Lockness Monsta ...

[@marcleopoldi3513]

🤣

[@DavidStill-k8x]

Are tree's 3 dimensions.

[@galloe8933]

I heard a long time back, but have no higher math skills to explain what I'm saying, so I'm more than likely wrong about this in ways I don't know, so grain of salt. I was told by an old highschool math teacher that a "Google" or "Googleplex" would have so many zeros that there would not be enough matter in the universe to write all the zeros out in the smallest way they can be written. That one always got me, but it may not even be true.

[@thedanyl]

Without editor it would be much hard to understand the topic. Great editing work...💥

[@NotBot-420]

Zeno's paradox is invalid because 1 simple reason. There is a finite length of space that anything can be divided into called tbe planck length, so as soon as your half distance was 1 planck length, that would mean in the next frame you reach your destination.

[@Ysrabo85]

AND TO UNDERSTAND THAT TREE(4) IS EVEN LARGER IS CRAZY

[@HakWilliams]

Now DOUBLE THAT!

[@Crow_Bot7]

😂

[@luizmonad777]

you can't double the tree number, it breaks one of the rules, that there's no repetition. its very clever, more clever than simple dumb tricks like "just add 1" what is a tree(4) that's the thing

[@JanJanssens-s1j]

That makes no difference,even squaring makes no difference

[@Jayden-su5sh]

Wait until he hears about tree(4).

[@Robert_McGarry_Poems]

Is tree(3) an exploration of quark color charge states in a proton? 🧐 Chromodynamics. The number of states the quarks can be in, inside of a proton, is almost infinite, almost...

[@Anthony-ru7sk]

This has given me an existential crisis

[@tiltingatwindmills3243]

For sure, I have no idea what’s going on in my head right now

[@gilliesiut2332]

I don’t understand how a finite number can’t exist in a infinite universe. Technically a infinite universe should even be able to fit a infinite number. But if there’s a speed of expansion of the universe and a known timeframe until the cold death then we should know the size of the universe and it’s not infinite

[@Robert_McGarry_Poems]

You are confusing the two concepts. Infinity isn't a size or a number per se. It is the concept of boundlessness. A boundless object can have a definite size. Pi. And finite objects can always be divided into halves ad-infinitum. A self-referential object, such as the universe, doesn't have an edge because no time and no space exist without it. Without photon exchange between fermions, to prop up exclusion, and cause causation to move in a linear entanglement, time doesn't exist. So, whatever the singularity is, that eventually contains only radiant wave energy, it wouldn't have a size or cause anything to happen. It would, however, instantly exist in a state of infinite probability. meaning everything that can happen does. Bang... Expansion is just the continuation of an infinitely dilated happening gradient... the happening side of the singularity will always be infinitely more active than the non-existent part.... see what I did there... so... expansion is spacetime affirming itself.

[@DavidStill-k8x]

Universes 15:24 is not infinare but is surrounded by a vacuum where time does not exist.

[@CatDad01]

the largest number imaginable can happen going from 0 to 1. you can infinitely half the distance and youd never get to 1.

[@dexterpoindexter3583]

Could that explain why some people never grow up? Are they going about it all wrong? 😄

[@brotherdon007]

It's number 73 according to Sheldon from the BB Theory...lol

[@not_sure_about_reality]

Very good work my friend, I dream of creating the same content as you and I am now learning how to do it.

[@fexl]

Go for it!❤️

[@ChakkravutChinalai]

Scientists don't mind lying for money. They'll talk about it if you paid them a few bucks.

[@cobiex]

Rayo's number anyone !!!??

[@ShawnReed-h9z]

*half-jokingly* Or Aleph Null - 1. :P

[@cobiex]

@@ShawnReed-h9z 🤣 Some might argue, but I guess the "-1" "technically" validates it as finite and therefore an even larger number! (I see what you're aiming for) ..I feel like the guy who brought a knife to a shoot out!

[@ShawnReed-h9z]

@@cobiex Right? If Aleph Null is the first uncountable number, then Aleph Null -1 would be the largest countable number. :P It's all in good fun. :D

[@MrMetzki]

I’m going with tree 4

[@TheUrantiaBook]

Aleph Null -1 to the Aleph Null -1 power is still basically zero compared to Vopenka's principle.

[@oldtimer2192]

I always thought it was 42!

[@tracy9531]

Good one 🤣😉

[@satrah101]

It's 42 months, the computer could not calculate variables.

[@negyt7665]

Exponentiations. I've learned a new word. Cool.

[@shitzofrantic5765]

Scientist 1: should we talk about this number? Scientist 2: no, please don't. I'm too freaked out.

[@costrio]

Is there such a thing as a true random number generator, if once determined, the number becomes no longer random? Philosopy and physics have one thing in common. Both are guess work based upon observations. They differ in that one field requires proof (data) that can be reproduced effectively, every time?

[@Apep507]

Numbers don’t end and therefore are pointless. Will & imagination is the infinite

[@marksmith1824]

Liked the video. Would have liked a mention of Graham's Number but that might even been too much (pardon the pun) for the audience.

[@tudorkimber4648]

Tree3 is larger than Grahams number - en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham's_number

[@TSotP]

@@marksmith1824 I'm sure I read somewhere online: You know how Graham's Number is built, and it can be understood as G64. Do the 3↑↑↑3, call that G1 then do 3↑(G1 arrows)↑3 and call that G2 And again and again and again until G64. Well, TREE(3) ≈ G19,000 But, as usual, I can't help myself. What about TREE(4)? Or TREE(G64)? Or TREE(TREE3))? Or TREE(3)↑↑ _(TREE(3) arrows)_ ↑↑TREE(3) Or, like how Graham's Number is built: TREE(3)↑↑ _(TREE(3) arrows)_ ↑↑TREE(3) =🌲1 And then keep going, compounding it until you get to 🌲G64 (so repeated Graham's Number of times, instead 64)

[@RedForeman]

There are 7.5 sextillion grains of sand on this planet earth… that number is literally nothing in comparison to what the universe holds .

[@mandogundam5779]

Yes however humans put the sex in sextillion and that the universe is severly lacking nyeeeaaa!!🧐

[@Robert_McGarry_Poems]

Great stuff...😊

[@rockNrolla130]

Infinity might just be a human concept or a flaw of our mathematics.. actual physical infinity only looks like that to us because we are not yet advanced enough to see that far... Just like everyone though the earth was flat some 1000s of years ago

[@numcrun]

4:47 confounds the number Tree(3) with the 3rd tree 5:13 oops

[@jamesskinnercouk]

I’m lost

[@ezvic420]

How many trees can be stored & contained inside of a black hole ? You know how much I love moms Spaghetti 🍝 👽💿💾🛸 🌽 and corn 🌽 . Infinite squared , light squared E=MC2 e2 = MC4 IVIIVI qubit qubit

[@TheUrantiaBook]

Tree (3) is basically zero compared to other numbers you could theorize.

[@notjackiechan9420]

wow, "Tree(3) is closer to zero than infinity" is brain breaking yet mentally freeing at the same time :)

[@chad0x]

Not perhaps. Definitely. In an infinite universe there are definitely an inifinite number of me.

[@puffdaddy420]

420, 420, 420

[@junak777]

Two spheres are just twist away. Said entropy while entering.

[@chad0x]

A quantum computer could work out that it had the solution without computing the entire solution. Then, it could answer questions about it.

[@williamhogancamp7716]

Even finite imaginary numbers are larger than the universe or multiverse. Not even our concept of infinity can explain the universe, life, consciousness. What science discusses as infinite are finite infinites, an infinite number of a finite set (numbers, time, space, odds). There is only one infinite infinite.

[@WilliamHarris69]

would you mind please expounding on your last sentence? I really enjoyed your comment.

[@williamhogancamp7716]

@@WilliamHarris69 The crutch of atheists is that given infinite universes and infinite time, even life and consciousness will appear by chance. I refer to even finite things exceed the ability of our universe or all others to render that argument mute. Furthermore I propose that the infinites we speak of are in fact finite infinites in that they limit the scope, the set of infinity. We speak of infinite numbers that are imaginary, not real or concrete. We speak of infinte time, space. However the true infinite is boundless not only in scope but definition. The one thing that is and contains all, all that is, all that isn't, all that could be, all that couldn't be, is God. That is all that truly exists.

[@SwamiSridattadevSatchitananda]

⭕️ = I = ♾, I is the smallest, the largest and everything in between. I can be anything I want to be. I only need 3 states(seeds) of Body, Mind and Soul aka Trinity to create Tree(3) number of conscious beings in the universe. We all exist because of I. Generator Organizer Destroyer Of ⭕️ = I = ♾ Dimensions Swami SriDattaDev SatChitAnanda

[@trixmtll1393]

There is no biggest number because the universe obeys the laws of displacement. If you keep adding one, you keep displacing the biggest number

[@Vile_Entity_3545]

You can always get bigger no matter what number you get.

[@Sarah-e3l8f]

Who else got a little headache even trying to solve it

[@mitchellbahm6589]

3. 7. 9. These are the numbers that are of unemmixed power. In with out of.

[@08SB80]

Forever incomplete… God elusively stands beside the final number as nothing. Nothing is better than, nothing.

[@donnelly5757]

Tree 3 is so terrifying, I think I'm going to have a rough time falling asleep tonight!

[@luizmonad777]

tree is kind of just normal. what terrified me is tree(4)

[@RedForeman]

Dude I just learned integral calculus……….. what am I suppose to do with this 💀

[@tiltingatwindmills3243]

Oh, tree (3)? Yeah, well I calculated a larger number called “swan archplex”. So, what now…

[@lowkeylogan]

To Infinity and Beyond!! 😃 -Buzz Lightyear

[@tracy9531]

The narrator asks the question where does this ĺeave us ......well I know where it leaves me.....alot dumber then I was before watching this video 🤪🤪🤪😂😂😂

[@RedForeman]

So tree 2= tree 3 but what number is tree 2!? 😭 my brain is on the brink of melting with this non comprehension

[@nicbaeten]

9 needs less space than 111111111. So 9 is bigger even it needs less space to write it.

[@OlivesT.wisted.Branch]

Tree 3 to the power of Tree 3

[@RS-Amsterdam]

Last week I was at the local University and it smelled terrible. The congiere said the Scientist shit their pants cause they were afraid of a Number🎉

[@Ghost_buster_313]

Some journeys are intelectual rather than physical!

[@MuddyDirt]

I introduce to the world: Tree4

[@luizmonad777]

0:38 let me try that : Godel(Godel) , yes, Godel is a number

[@nibba5]

now get ready for tree (4)

[@Phillmagroin]

8:10 then couldnt you just change the 2 up up 1000 symbols to tree 3 up up 1000 symbols?

[@leecraw972]

This video is starting to just barely describe to concept of God. Now Imagine a consciousness within the realm of complexity of different orders of infinity.

[@greenmoss9079]

I like this video so much to learn and thats what is best Humans ! Wont worry about AI its programed to learn but we Want to learn!! Thanks 😊

[@Yahsom]

Tree (Tree(3))

[@sallybalkin8507]

Ok got it. Now let's talk about TREE (4)? 🤪🤪

[@Froggy_Devil]

how about tree 8

[@golamkibria406]

3 6 9 is most valuable number in the world

[@Shyskey]

9 is

[@curtbousquet3215]

Ok, but can you explain why?

[@Eatchins]

69 is the number u want.

[@frankrizzo7746]

@@curtbousquet3215 Value of 3, 6, 9 Claimed Based on the provided search results, it appears that Nikola Tesla, a renowned inventor and visionary, was fascinated by the numbers 3, 6, and 9. He believed that understanding these numbers held the key to unlocking the universe’s secrets. This fascination has led to various interpretations and applications, including: Patterns and Geometry: The numbers 3, 6, and 9 are connected to patterns found in nature, such as the branching of leaves, seashells, and animal stripes. These patterns follow mathematical ratios like pi, the golden ratio, and the Fibonacci series, indicating an underlying code that connects all matter. Vortex Mathematics: A repeating pattern of numbers, starting from 1 and doubling, is observed in vortex mathematics. This pattern does not include 3, 6, and 9 initially, but when doubling these numbers, a unique sequence emerges. Unity and Duality: The numbers 3 and 6 govern two dimensions (A and B), while 9 serves as the unity or singularity that encapsulates the entire universe. 9 is considered the symbol of enlightenment, representing both creation and destruction, singularity and manifestation. Manifestation and Gratitude: Some individuals have experimented with incorporating 3, 6, and 9 into their daily lives, setting reminders at these times to practice gratitude and recite a mantra. This practice has reportedly led to increased abundance, success, and manifestation in their lives.

[@Jayisjay-g5c]

A number system based on three. Instead of using '10' as a set, a '100' and a thousand and so on, you would go with '3', '9', '27', '81', except all these numbers would have different words to indicate their value and different symbols for numbers. Alien math. 😂

[@priscillawillis1969]

Do you mind my asking what the purpose is to do it. The arrows up.

[@mt1745]

Impressed

[@valerielhw]

Is the tree number larger than googol? What about googolplex?

[@Vile_Entity_3545]

They are tiny compared to them.

[@cobiex]

🤣 No offence, but I have to laugh.Those are super unimaginably and fantastically-stupendously miniscule numbers when compared to Rayo's number or Tree 3

[@rlimagon]

Tree (4)? 😂

[@seanrose5616]

AWESOME, My mind is blown🤯!

[@Chris-f3u9z]

😂 Russia's fine for Google:

[@challahsmith3257]

You talking about the plus sign into a Christian cross

[@chad0x]

I can imagine something bigger than the entire universe. I've met your mom.

[@b.lonewolf417]

TREE 3 isn't all that bad! I mean, at least that number is less than your mom's weight...

[@ezvic420]

How many trees can be stored & contained inside of a black hole ? You know how much I love moms Spaghetti 🍝 👽💿💾🛸 🌽 and corn 🌽. I hacked my harddrive so it has infinite space , no matter what stored on it , it’s only 1% full

[@DJJunkfoodJay]

Tree 3 + 1

[@pokehunter7078]

Tree is a number? 😂😂😂

[@ArnoMor13]

You could write Pi on the wall, small symbol.

[@alexanderimmortal4354]

It's 33

[@isaacgarza3307]

Omega. Infinity + alpha time = God

[@BellisimaBlossom]

Amen 🙏🏾

[@softbytesunlimited]

Number is infinite

[@4thbranch834]

Zero

[@GlenMcQuillan-o7h]

You know, it's not really something I've been wasting time trying to work out. I really don't have an idea, if it's worth spending time on.

[@ashwolf6762]

Pilamaya🙏🪽🤟🫶💛

[@robertbereny6492]

😂

[@maxruedy951]

Turn an 8 on it's side.

[@danielmarquez4935]

Now I get why they are called 33 degree masons… 33🫡🫡🫡

[@ilikemitchhedberg]

TREE3 [g64] 😏😏😏