The Most Underrated Upgrade for Bass and Guitar - Replacing the Bridge

  Рет қаралды 3,791

Stellar Audio Lab

Stellar Audio Lab

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 27
@AllAboutBasses
@AllAboutBasses 4 ай бұрын
Completely agree! Easy and generally cheap upgrade that is noticeable.
@BenKruegerAudio
@BenKruegerAudio 3 ай бұрын
Awesome!
@PeterGaspar-vm4cb
@PeterGaspar-vm4cb 3 ай бұрын
I have a four string neck through body bass with a single cut body shape. It had quite good sustain already but when I replaced the stock bridge with a KSM bridge the improvement in sound quality was amazing. Not only the sustain has improved but the overall tonality as well. KSM is light weight because it is made from aircraft grade aluminium and after adjusting it you can lock down every part of it. So absolutely no moving or rattling parts and it is like a solid piece of metal once everything is locked down. Beautiful overtones and sustain for ages.
@BenKruegerAudio
@BenKruegerAudio 3 ай бұрын
That is awesome, I’ll have to check those out. Good point also about the tight tolerance of the parts.
@offbeatbassgear
@offbeatbassgear 4 ай бұрын
Adding a bridge with greater mass and more precise adjustment and intonation is a useful, pretty easy upgrade to make to most basses though one point to keep in mind is that the improvements in tone and sustain are not going to be profound if there's a decent bridge already installed on it.
@BenKruegerAudio
@BenKruegerAudio 4 ай бұрын
Good point! Definitely agree. I have definitely heard what I would call improvements going from a ‘good’ bridge to a great one - ex: stock mid-tier Fender to Callaham, Mastery, etc.,, but less drastic of course with nicer bridges.
@jburtonca
@jburtonca 3 ай бұрын
I like a bass with the string through option. The string through has a much steeper angle and more downward pressure on the saddles which helps to eliminate rattling. Acoustic guitar players can modify their bridge by cutting slots between the bridge pins and the nut. The steeper string angle makes a noticeable improvement.
@BenKruegerAudio
@BenKruegerAudio 3 ай бұрын
Awesome, thanks for sharing that tip. My P Bass has both string through and top-loader options. It is awesome to hear or feel a difference just from that.
@carlton1390
@carlton1390 2 ай бұрын
I think that if you have an instrument that is of high quality and sounds good with a low mass bridge it may not sound as good with a high mass one. A high mass bridge can have the effect of overriding the essential sound of a guitar or bass- this can be good if the instrument doesn't sound good to you as is. My general thoughts around replacing vintage style Fender bridges with high mass ones have been that the HM bridge doesn't so much add sustain but shifts the resonant frequency and dead/hot notes to new locations on the neck (you may want this). It also changes the tone of a bass- more emphasised low end, less mids, and the top end becomes smoother/less responsive. I think that a good sounding vintage style Fender bass sounds generally better with the traditional bridge.
@BenKruegerAudio
@BenKruegerAudio 2 ай бұрын
Good points.
@ileutur6863
@ileutur6863 2 ай бұрын
One of the things people don't talk about with replacing bridges is how the new one might not be entirely compatible. I had a bass where I replaced the classic bent plate bridge with a Babicz high mass, but the base plate was a different thickness, so the bass needed a neck shim and new setup to work right. So in the end I had no idea if the tonal changr came from the bridge, thd shim or the new setup.
@BenKruegerAudio
@BenKruegerAudio 2 ай бұрын
Good point! Another thing to consider and research ahead.
@xp50player
@xp50player 4 ай бұрын
Getting shorter saddle height screws would have been easier than replacing the whole bridge. I had to get longer screws for the Schaller bridge on my Yamaha RBX270, because I could not get the saddles high enough and the screws were buried in there.
@BenKruegerAudio
@BenKruegerAudio 4 ай бұрын
Good idea. Similarly, I have done that for a guitar bridge in the past. I wanted to upgrade this one anyway because of the tone/sustain aspect. Cheers!
@violao206
@violao206 21 күн бұрын
Comfort feel is a big incentive. I am curious how the new bass sound sits in a mix. Maybe the lo-fi sound might be better at cutting through the mix. Just a thought. The extra sustain might also be a great thing, or maybe not the thing you are looking either.
@BenKruegerAudio
@BenKruegerAudio 21 күн бұрын
Totally agree! It is for sure more comfortable. If I would not have changed to the bridge in the video, I would have bought a different vintage style bridge, or at least ground down the screws to not cut into my hand. It has more sustain, which can sometimes be less desirable, but it feels way better to me and works well for me and in other ways is superior for recording, so I am happy with it.
@timothysegal3589
@timothysegal3589 3 ай бұрын
I totally don't agree with this video. Most of the pop and rock history of last century was recorded on vintage Fenders that had light mass vintage style bridges. If you want more systain, maybe yes, but we are talking about bass here. If you like a traditional tone, I even think that high mass bridges improvre frequencies I personally don't like in a bass. It's good if you like more mid and slap style bass, but for traditional tone, just keep the old one. I preferred how the bass sounded with the original bridge.
@BenKruegerAudio
@BenKruegerAudio 3 ай бұрын
I agree, if you want less sustain go with the traditional. It has more of a thump and then dies more.
@AndrejDoms
@AndrejDoms 2 ай бұрын
It is just different sounds… use what you prefer.
@gianniconti69
@gianniconti69 3 ай бұрын
Sounds Beefier with high mass bridge 😅
@BenKruegerAudio
@BenKruegerAudio 3 ай бұрын
I agree!
@johnhuser6062
@johnhuser6062 Ай бұрын
do not agree at all!
@BenKruegerAudio
@BenKruegerAudio Ай бұрын
That’s what makes the world go round, cheers mate!
@zdys2yllhso45
@zdys2yllhso45 2 ай бұрын
Hi Steve. Why did you left apple?
@BenKruegerAudio
@BenKruegerAudio 2 ай бұрын
Banana was calling.
@G.G.-nt2mi
@G.G.-nt2mi 2 ай бұрын
Adding a hi mass bridge seems more stable latterally and more comfortable for palm muting. as far as sustain, most likely never going to hold a note long enough to matter. BUT, Will I lose any punch/thump , lows or low mids? Im installing pv63 pups for those attributes and don't want to defeat that purpose...?
@BenKruegerAudio
@BenKruegerAudio 2 ай бұрын
My perception with the high mass bridge was that it added more sustain. Made the signal feel more compressed. That may or may not be welcome. For this space, in my opinion, I believe the tone is better. It is also a non-destructive modification, so you could also try it out. Be careful when removing the strings, and go back to your old bridge if it is not a welcome total change.
How To Improve A Fender P Bass
18:39
Phillip McKnight
Рет қаралды 113 М.
Леон киллер и Оля Полякова 😹
00:42
Канал Смеха
Рет қаралды 4,7 МЛН
To Brawl AND BEYOND!
00:51
Brawl Stars
Рет қаралды 17 МЛН
Levels of Floyd Rose tremolos FINALLY Explained
23:54
The Axe Guitar
Рет қаралды 76 М.
Was G&L Leo Fender’s biggest MISTAKE?
46:39
Scott's Bass Lessons
Рет қаралды 96 М.
Bass Albums that Changed Music. Ep 4. Rush / Moving Pictures
15:21
Scott's Bass Lessons
Рет қаралды 195 М.
MUSTANG MICRO PLUS: EVERYTHING TO KNOW
9:59
Ollie Loops
Рет қаралды 28 М.
Pro Guitar Tech's Most Hated Things (and how to fix them)
16:30
Rhett Shull
Рет қаралды 1,5 МЛН
Why do the session legends all use P basses? Here's why.
11:54
Scott's Bass Lessons
Рет қаралды 1,3 МЛН
The Greatest Bass Amps & Cabs of 2024? (Our Fav’s)
1:01:15
Scott's Bass Lessons
Рет қаралды 63 М.
High Mass "Frankenstein" Bridge for 20 Bucks - How To and Sound Tests
14:07
Леон киллер и Оля Полякова 😹
00:42
Канал Смеха
Рет қаралды 4,7 МЛН