The Mystery of Dark Matter

[@halfpintcustoms3428]

If science was taught like this in school I’d be a physicist. Opportunity lost 😢

[@LordOfThePancakes]

Lol you sure u would have passed all the physics & math courses pea brain? I Highly doubt it…

[@welingkartr416]

At @8.44 the video states (paraphrasing) "Einstein theorised the bending of light due to the curvature of space-time around a massive object, calling it gravitational lensing, and that this phenomenon remained a theory and was yet to be observed until (@9.05) Yannick and colleagues observed something strange in the sky in Hawaii (in 1985)." This is about the gravitational lensing due to the galactic cluster observed around Abel 370 of a distant galaxy. The way you place the two events, would make one believe that prior to 1985 no one had discovered gravitational lensing. But you know that's incorrect. Einstein had published his paper in 1911, corrected in 1915 and on 29th May 1919, the Eddington experiment organised by the British astronomers Frank Watson Dyson and Arthur Stanley Eddington during a total solar eclipse validated gravitational lensing. Yes, Yannick and colleagues showed such lensing also happened around galactic clusters is true.

[@peerleliveld9594]

CNN 😉☹️☹️😉🫢😅😮😮😮😅😮😮😮😢😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😅😢 15:59 😅 15:59 15:59 and😮😅😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮 15:59 😮😮😮 15:59 😮😮😮

[@peerleliveld9594]

😮😮😅😮😮 15:59 😮 15:59 am am 15:59 😮😮😮😮😮 15:59 o o 15:59 15:59 😮😮😮 15:59 is is is not 15:59 😮 15:59 😮😮 15:59 15:59 is is 15:59 😮 15:59 is 15:59 😮😮😮😮 15:59 and the 😮other 15:59 😮😮 15:59 😮 15:59 I

[@peerleliveld9594]

@@welingkartr416

[@flavio-viana-gomide]

Man, this documentary is very good. It's the first which shows somedoby has discovered a way to detect dark matter. So now, I guess, there is an evidence of its presence. There are many thing we don't see with light that exists. The radio waves are everywhere.

[@martinkim7302]

1 month ago yet they are still referiing to Arecibo as the largest radio telescope in the world. I thought this one got damaged and is not up for repair

[@ForteGX]

This is a doc from 2012. A bit outdated in terms of history, but not bad as an introduction to the science.

[@ossomnos]

Give credit where it's due,why not mention Fritz Zwicky for being the 1st person to postulate dark matter in the 1930's?

[@LordOfThePancakes]

Because. He was an alcoholic.

[@kiabtoomlauj6249]

Because it is a purely made up thing; it doesn't exist, like Planet Vulcan, Ether, and other assertions. Zwicky was roughly about 10 years older than Einstein; but they're the crop of scientists born in the late 1800s to early 1900s. ZERO of Einstein's formerly incredulous or "real but impossible to ascertain" ideas are left unproven. Einstein was positive gravitational propagation that's smaller than the nucleus of atoms was just too small to ever be proven. It's been EASILY proven, once LIGO was first turned on. Brownian motion, photo electric effect, SR, GR, and most of the obscure principles girding those theories... have all been proven. Zwicky's 1910-20's Dark Matter has NEVER been proven, although EVERY scientist and astronomer who's ever done observation of the larger cosmos, has ever calculated LARGE scale structure motions... swear up and down their grandmother's grave "it is real." My parents SEE and UNDERSTAND "ghosts" and "evil spirits" all the time. They swear up and down their own parents and grand parents graves those ghosts and evil spirits are real. It doesn't matter how "real" things are, to you, or to someone who believe them.... NATURE doesn't have to work THE WAY you think it works. BTW, the star S-2, that, with S-1 and a few others, revolve around the core of the Milky Way (its 4M Sun size black hole) once every 16 or so years.... they move at around 11,000,000 MPH. By contrast, our Sun ---- 26,000 light years from the core of the Milky Way --- moves around the Sun at a speed of roughly 600,000MPH. The "Dark Matter" assertion that UNLIKE PLANETARY SYSTEM mechanics, like our Solar system, where planets in the outer most regions move much slower around the Sun than do planets closet to the Sun --- that when it comes to GALACTIC STRUCTURES, objects & matter in the outer most rims of galaxies MOVE AT THE SAME SPEED AS THOSE IN THE INNER GALACTIC CORE ----- "and, so, without dark matter, suns and everything else would be flown into the darkness of space" ad nauseam..... y'know, the mindlessly stupid BS KZbin video on astronomy and programs ALWAYS say, like people are dumb as shit and all we have to do is just nod our heads, whenever and where we hear such gibberish nonsense --- that is CLEARLY, idiotically wrong. I may only have two undergraduate college years of introductory calculus, but when you say BS like that, you should be stopped immediately and asked to re-state whatever the phuc you're trying to say. Because, again, you do'nt have to be an Einstein level of genius to immediately understand that Earth's Sun DOES NOT MOVE at the same speed as the sun labeled as S-2, bye the core of the Milky Way. We are NOT talking about S-2 needing only 16 years to make one revolution, with the Earth's Sun needing 250M years to do the same thing. Those facts ARE A FUNCTION of their differential speeds. But even if we MADE the Earth's Sun travel at 11,000,000MPH, like S-2, we here on earth and our Sun still need roughly 500 years to make ONE REVOLUTION around the core of the Milky Way, from were we are, roughly 26,000 or so light years out from the core of the Milky Way. So, again, this Dark Matter BS that everything (suns and matter) moves around a spinning galaxy at the same speed, regardless whether they are in the inner or outer rims of a galactic structure ---- a BS that also says "that could only mean there's tons of Dark Matter that is holding things in place, extra gravity without which everything in a spinning galaxy would be flying every which way" ---- is just that, BS. And, then, there are GALAXIES that show "a complete lack of Dark Matter." Further, there also are galaxies that DO NOT move in a "phenomenally fast" & spiraling manner like the Milky Way. The largest known galaxy in the universe, IC1101, for example ---- a giant spherical structure, where stars are jostling around, rather than screening in a linear manner around the core ---- DOES NOT need dark matter... for its 100 trillion stars NOT BE FLYING EVERY WHICH WA.... And THAT IS WHY crazy man Zwicky's Darkt Matter BS has NEVER been proven, in over 100 years of everyone BELIEVING in it.... despite close to 100% of all "serious scientists" believe Dark Matter exists. BTW, up until the 1990s, when most of us were in college, the older ones of us... close to 100% of these same scientists also believed the Universe's RATE of expansion was SLOWING DOWN; they merely needed lowly paid Post Doc's to measure the rate at which the SLOWING DOWN was happening. Turned out, it's the exact opposite: the RATE at which the Universe is expanding .... is ACCELERATING.

[@paullarby727]

Zwicky picked up some of the first evidence of dark matter, but he didn't really discover it. He postulated the weird movements of galaxy clusters was due to invisible planets and moons that didn't shine like a star, but didn't really provide any evidence to support this. She proposed the actual invisible substance we think of as dark matter now and supported this with actual observations from movements of stars within galaxies themselves. Her science was simply better.

[@MeissnerEffect]

Hey this presentation is excellent! So very encouraging to see true science videos that show the real mystery and empirical discoveries!! Better than any fiction

[@DolphLundgrensDolphinDungeon]

I love that spacerip is still uploading videos after 2,000 years

[@coodudeman]

are you suggesting that they uploaded videos two thousand years ago??? wasn't that before Al Gore invented the internet??? lol

[@wattoplays6332]

What's that?

[@coodudeman]

@@wattoplays6332 An Al Gore is a politician who made silly claims in the 90s lol

[@jaymakormik6779]

​@@coodudemanYahh,,boy, was Al Gore wrong or what.? hmmm...

[@salamander554]

Is it possible that gravity behaves this way on scales as large as a galaxy with a massive black hole in the middle? And we are just chasing the ether once again?

[@LordOfThePancakes]

No. & No.

[@bigd1207]

I think it's very possible.

[@JackClayton123]

It’s called modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND) and is a possibility that physicists admit as a potential hypothesis.

[@MitternachtAngel]

I hope to be alive to see the debunk of this dark crap.

[@POLICECAMERA6688]

The fact that scientists are diligently digging deep underground tunnels to search for black matter particles immediately reminds me of the game 'rescuing the princess' in Mario Bros. 🌝🚀 They turned Earth into a giant playground in the hope of finding that mysterious black matter 'princess'.

[@SuperiorDave]

Umm, dark matter, not black. I see what you did there.

[@POLICECAMERA6688]

@@SuperiorDave That's right, thank you for correcting me.

[@stellarwind1946]

4:03 imagine being the guy who proposed it first in the 1930s be told decades later he wasn’t a serious enough scientist to claim credit for it

[@tundrawomansays694]

That says more about the “scientists” and their exclusionary belief in their own speshall snowflake status than it does about the original scientist who actually discovered the phenomenon. I’d be disgusted too.

[@fantastica5967]

It was fritz wicky in 1930s ?? I think🤔

[@LordOfThePancakes]

He should have thought more outside the box.

[@priscillawrites6685]

Science is about asking the right questions

[@habilis999]

Who needs dark matter when you've got dark chocolate? It's the sweet force holding this tasty universe together!

[@zvisger]

Rage bait lol

[@DanielVerberne]

Sigh. Okay.

[@teddy2577]

I prefer milk chocolate myself 😂

[@kamranmovahed7934]

How true, how true ❤❤❤❤😂😂😂

[@LordOfThePancakes]

Dark chocolate is disgusting

[@annegajerski-cauley8324]

Very high quality presentation; thank you. Haven't seen this type of care put into presentation since PBS NOVA, which, apropos of halfpintcustoms' remark below, DID help encourage my interest in physics and later a career in it.

[@shawns0762]

The fundamental phenomenon of dilation (sometimes called gamma or y) explains galaxy rotation curves/dark matter. Mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. It's the phenomenon behind the phrase "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". A 2 axis graph illustrates its squared nature, dilation increases at an exponential rate the closer you get to the speed of light. A "time dilation" graph illustrates the same phenomenon, it's not just time that gets dilated. Dilation will occur wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass because high mass means high momentum. This includes the centers of very high mass stars and the overwhelming majority of galaxy centers. It can be inferred mathematically that the mass at the center of our own galaxy must be dilated. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. More precisely, everywhere you point is equally valid. In other words that mass is all around us. Dilation does not occur in galaxies with low mass centers because they do not have enough mass to achieve relativistic velocities. It has been confirmed in 6 very low mass galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 to have no dark matter, in other words they have normal rotation rates. All binary stars have normal rotation rates for the same reason.

[@salamander554]

I'll take your word for it. Maybe we are chasing the ether again

[@LordOfThePancakes]

Only thing illustrating its “squared nature” here is u…

[@OTDECK]

The fabric of space must be dark matter

[@LordOfThePancakes]

No.

[@OTDECK]

@@LordOfThePancakes it has to be, can we see the fabric of space?

[@LordOfThePancakes]

@@OTDECK I can, yes.

[@LordOfThePancakes]

@@OTDECK I can, yes.

[@OTDECK]

@@LordOfThePancakes is this the invisible one your shown on space documentary’s 😂?

[@DawgPro]

When I saw Arecibo... I went "THIS IS OLD!" SpaceRip... you do good stuff but this... is ancient history.... clicked off at 15:42. 06/12/2012 - Diffusion sur Arte "Le mystère de la matière noire"

[@tonymarshharveytron1970]

Hello, I can explain logically what Dark Matter is. I would very much like to offer the following to the whole team. According to my hypothesis, which can unify the various fields of physics, explain Dark Matter: Dark Energy: Antimatter, and two forces of gravity. Also, an alternative explanation for the CMBR: Redshift: The atom: and a nonexpanding universe without any Big Bang or Cosmic Inflation, the following may be of interest. The biggest question that needs to be asked in Cosmology is, Why is it that we can only see back to the CMBR at the same distance in every direction? This presents two problems. Firstly, in a universe that is said to have a beginning in a Big Bang and Cosmic inflation within a billionth of a billionth of a second, dissipating the heat, radiation, and Matter throughout the universe, this would imply that there is a limit to how far this matter has spread. If our Earth is situated anywhere other than the middle of this mass, we should see the CMBR at different distances in every direction. And Yes I have studied the ; Relativistic cosmological model, and what I say still stands. And secondly, since the JWST is proving that there are fully mature galaxies so far back in time that they would have to have existed before the so-called Big Bang, It rules out that the CMBR is not what it is believed to be. Since the only thing that supports the Big Bang is the CMBR, the only evidence for an expanding universe is Redshift and the only way that the Big Bang can be rationalized in a thermally equal universe is by the idea of Cosmic Inflation, which is a physical impossibility, Physicists are going round in circles trying to support the status quo. I would propose that the standard model is flawed at the level of the atom. There was no Big Bang and Cosmic inflation. The universe is not expanding, has always existed much as it is today and extends to infinity, therefore it has no beginning and probably will never end. There are two forces of Gravity, which I have a simple experiment that can prove this, and also proves the existence of Dark Energy / Dark matter. Dark Matter is an incredibly small Negatively charged Monopole particle in a cloud that fills every available empty space throughout the universe. Dark Energy, is the negative force of repulsion produced by the Dark Matter Particles trying to repel each other in every direction. It is also one of the two forces of gravity. The CMBR is not due to the Big Bang, but is a point where electromagnetic radiation reaches saturation. Redshift is not due to the expansion of the universe, but is due to electromagnetic radiation losing speed and energy over billions of years, If you consider over a period of around 14 Billion years, it would only have to lose 1 mile per second every 140,000 years to account for the redshift we see. This and much more is explained in my Hypothesis, ( The Two Monopole Particle Universe ), details of which can be found by typing Tony Norman Marsh into Google If you or any of your panel are interested and can provide me with an email address, I am happy to send you a copy. Kind regards, Tony Marsh

[@GertOverweg55]

"There was no Big Bang and Cosmic inflation." I intent to agree. Don't ask me why, a feeling. But if it was a 'big bang', we all came from the same source on the same time, so, how can we than have such great distances between us?

[@GertOverweg55]

Tony, did You also thought about the idea that it can be an influense of a type 1,2,3, or higher evolution scale ?

[@tonymarshharveytron1970]

Hello Gert, I am convinced that the universe and quantum physics is far more simple than the physicists and cosmologists would like us to believe. We have to accept that the Big Bang and Cosmic inflation could not have happened because they are physically impossible, so therefore new ideas are needed, I believe that my hypothesis ' The two Monopole Particle Universe will sooner or later be proven to be right. Kind regards, Tony Marsh.

[@GertOverweg55]

@@tonymarshharveytron1970 Hi Tony, Thank You for Your response. I think this book will be too difficult for me. I am more of the Spiritual way and beleive that is one key to the answer we all seek. With Love, Gert

[@defensegeneral9893]

Verse 35:41 "Indeed, Allah holds the heavens and the earth, lest they cease. And if they should cease, no one could hold them [in place] after Him". Quran, This verse suggests, dark matter that is holding the universe together is God

[@coodudeman]

the cup analogy is silly because you would be unable to interact with the cup if you were made of "dark matter" in any way other than gravitationally - also... wasn't there a probe that studied the CMBR before WMAP?

[@DeepWebDiary]

Dark matter is obviously “dead” light. Stars create everything. The further that light travels, the bigger the universe expands as that light dies.

[@rubyfern9965]

I thought gravitational forces are solely responsible for the pull attractions between particles. And I was taught when I was a kid, that the twinkling of the stars are caused by small debris passing to it. 😅

[@garrysmith7156]

The problem is model is it’s in two dimension or three dimension This model implies that there’s an upper down or a side to side This model implies that gravity is pulling the sun down onto space fabric

[@MsSmee2]

Atoms do not only account for 5% of the matter in the universe. That's a problem with language. The universe could very well be infinite. What is 5% of infinity? Don't say universe. Say observable universe. The observable universe is accelerating away from us. There are other ways to account for that without imagining a giant lump of matter with gravitational attraction. Also, time is infinite. We are measuring the speed and direction of the observable universe at a tiny point in space time. We assume that we have a representative sample. The observable universe could speed up and slow down in a cycle over long time that results is a completely different conclusion about the speed and there would be no need for the big attractive mass.

[@JamesMacharia-wr1ix]

We know what the creator want us to know period

[@mikebrown9850]

Congratulations! You’re discovering more questions!☝🏻

[@garrysmith7156]

We’re really stretching That would explain so much Our minds are not equipped to understand infinity A human mind can’t even picture 1 million Limited eyes only see 3% of visible light I truly believe that we are going to somehow have to VR to see things smaller than a photon It’s strange to think that if you’re smaller than light , you can’t be seen We are very much handicapped by our eyes

[@The-Final-Experiment]

The Final Experiment will allow us to move on from the shape of the Earth and focus more on things like this.

[@il3mendo]

Atoms, amino acid, energy, stars, moons, planets, galaxies and the universe.

[@watgaz518]

At the BB? everything needed to create a universe was already predetermined at a scale smaller than quantum, for which we are currently trying to comprehend. There were stages which quickly followed one another to enable the exponential and rapid growth of a structure needed to build a universe. Fortunately, on this occasion, it was successful.

[@BarryMonaghan-o2o]

if we travel ,what is at start , is there 0 there now ,or dark matter

[@benhoffman6606]

Yall are only looking for matter in space time. And completely dismissing the word time when it involves blackholes. Blackholes have a profound effect on space when time feilds become so extremely distorted.

[@polpothead3076]

Because scientists basic assumptions and equations are faulty, they need to invent "dark matter" to make up for some lack of matter in the universe. First, they don't know how big the Universe is or where it's centre is, so how can you make such extraordinary speculations sound like established facts? Einstein said we should practice humility in the face of a nature we can never fully understand.

[@clivejenkins4033]

So called dark matter, stars and black holes, in my opinion they are all interconnected

[@garrysmith7156]

Without physics We are left only two we can see Our eyes are just not capable It’s such an ironic since we have We see such beauty and colors But we are so limited to what only 3% We’re forced to improvise with our intelligence,

[@sylvantutchwildwood2144]

​@SinuousGrace something more concrete? Dark matter being much denser than our atomic state if formed into 'tools' in our dimension will explain or go some way to explaining ancient stone culling techniques.

[@TakashiL-b6o]

So, dark matter was created for Newton?

[@from-Texas]

Ok geniuses here it is: Dark matter is different than dark energy. Dark matter is the collective karma of the universe. Dark energy is what interacts with euclidean space. Dark energy shapes our known universe but draws upon what has happened

[@ThomAnno]

Background music is killing me

[@2_Trillion_galaxies]

So if dark matter was a tree galaxies would be its flowers ,a beautiful analogy wouldn't you agree,

[@LordOfThePancakes]

No.

[@machida58]

​@@LordOfThePancakesyes

[@Jason-gt2kx]

Novel Dark Matter Hypothesis Dark Matter is simply unaccounted for gravity. GR states that gravity is the consequence of the curvature of spacetime. Is it possible that the structure of spacetime itself could be warped without the presence of matter? Spacetime has been shown to react like a fabric by warping, twisting, and propagating independently of mass, and all have been proven with observations from gravitational lensing, frame dragging, and now gravitational waves! Fabrics can also be stretched, pressured, and/or heated to the point of causing a deformation and losing its elastic nature. All of these conditions were extreme during inflation, so it is plausible that the “fabric” of spacetime analog could extend having its elastic property have hit a yield point leaving pockets of inelastic spacetime geodesic that cause gravity without the presence of matter? Therefore, if gravity is strictly the consequence of the warped of spacetime, and fabrics can be permanently overstretched, then those empty warped geodesics would create gravitational wells independent of mass. My hypothesis of DM is subatomic black hole imprints of the quantum fluctuations that popped in at the moment of inflation. The CMB shows where the hot dense regions were they created the galaxies. They would have been the initial cause and location of the warping. These imprints would be clouds of quantum sized floating fixed geodesics, so they couldn’t expand or evaporate. Perhaps nothing has been detected because there is nothing to detect. GR wouldn’t require modification because DM would just be an extension of how spacetime behaves at extreme conditions. No MOND, no WIMPs, and no parallel universes, just empty spacetime deformations that produce gravitational wells to help jump start galaxy accretion processes. Zwicky may have named is Missing Mass correctly since he detected some gravity without mass present to cause it… During inflations subatomic black holes with were created by direct collapse in locations of high density scene on the CMB. These primordial black holes are subatomic with fixed geodesics due to the birth of spacetime hitting its yield point due to the inflation and such high tempatures. These primordial subatomic black holes can not grow or decrease in size due to spactime’s yield point causing fixed geodesics, so the amount of dark matter would not grow or decrease over time and baryonic matter can stick to this dark matter and be able to be separated as we see in the bullet cluster since dark matter is subatomic.

[@jasonstinson1767]

Dark matter is todays phlogiston

[@cr1424]

The real mystery is what all the scientists and researchers next mystery to solve will be, to keep the funding flowing to them.

[@TheGRTiger]

Shouldn't all light be impacted by gravitational lensing if dark matter accounts for 95% of the visible universe? Is there not dark matter between us and the sun, planets, and even the moon?

[@MeissnerEffect]

There’s also Dark Energy, Dark Matter and normal matter. Dark Energy makes up a huge amount of the Universe. Dark Energy causes the Universe to expand (amazing). But with your question about Dark Matter = We can’t really see it on a solar system scale, its affects are seen at galactic or larger scale like galaxy clusters, nebulae etc. And not everywhere in the same amount. If you see those maps of dark matter that look like Swiss cheese with holes sometimes?, or as the dark matter impacts differently to normal matter when two galaxies collide? Hope that helps. It’s sort of like dark matter is the 30,000 mosquitoes at someone’s barbecue 😊 You can see their shadow through the log fire light but not as they bite you 😊 and everyone knows they’re attracted to people 😊

[@LordOfThePancakes]

No. & No.

[@LordOfThePancakes]

@@MeissnerEffectOh? Is that right now… So is that a threat?

[@clivejenkins4033]

Stars would not fly off into the cosmos, if there was no dark matter, there would be no stars

[@KenJoseph-s9p]

In an Electrical Universe Electrical Magnatisum make up the force, were Gravity and dark matter fall short. In fact the big pitcher of the Universe looks just like the Electrical firings of part of the Human brain when it is active

[@SnoopDoggg420]

looking for dark matter is like trying to smell with you're eyes.

[@moxxy3565]

"with you are eyes"?

[@jmaleman2164]

Love the drums. Feels like Romans are about to fight the Mongols 🤪

[@bitrage.]

I still haven't had any1 give a good answer to if the missing matter isn't just spread out gas and dust... we can't even see all the matter outside of Pluto let alone all space, if it's widely spread in low concentrations how could we detect it? It would be invisible...

[@JamesMacharia-wr1ix]

Curiosity!!!!!!!!

[@china5067]

This guy is like the smarter look alike version of Elon Musk

[@johnlawrance5387]

consciousness is to our brain.is what dark matter is to our universe after all were all star stuff according to the great Carl seigan we cant see wind but we know its there we feel it but its invisable

[@Scanini]

In the future could we not travel using wormholes created from dark matter? As we are not effected to its crushing force up to a point but entering the wormhole created by it we could travel interstellar?

[@hamentaschen]

"I'm gonna go get the papers, get the papers."

[@lgbfjb7160]

I know enough to know that I know nothing however there is something that has always bothered me about this so called dark matter. If it were matter ,would it not be be detectable? I propose calling it dark mass, seems more appropriate.

[@luckynicky13]

RIP Arecibo Observatory ❤

[@UNIVERSE-XFILE]

There're many questions out there

[@johnpoppenhusen4178]

All physical matter in existence must have an end. This is the basic purpose of the Blackhole. It even destroys complete star systems throughout the universes as to control ongoing creation. I.e. the alpha and the omega.

[@James-ll3jb]

Is dark matter an illusion? As one of many scientists who have become somewhat skeptical of dark matter, CERN physicist Dragan Slavkov Hajdukovic has proposed that the illusion of dark matter may be caused by the gravitational polarization of the quantum vacuum.Aug 11, 2011

[@ronaldorodriguesdasilva4302]

We need a new theory of gravity ! Will the dark comunity allow this come to life one day ?

[@j.r.2322]

What is the name of the music?

[@azazelzel6954]

Dark Matter, just a meaningless name given to some force that we just don't understand.

[@davidwallace4665]

I hope im still alive to find out what Dark Matter and dark Energy really is but i doubt it we will ever know for sure. Gods last secrets will probably remain a Secret. One thing is a certainty the more i study the Universe the more im determined there was/is a creater which only can be Gods Work.

[@richardgobeli5438]

They don't use GR to calculate the rotation speed. Big mistake.

[@andrewadius142]

Cool.

[@tadeth]

50:36 says it all. I think the rest is wasted venture.

[@BarryMonaghan-o2o]

it show , light speed , so where and what is at , where we came from

[@ZeroAlligator]

While entertaining, this video contains a lot of inaccurate information. Just to name two big things that it gets wrong: the Arecibo Observatory was destroyed almost 4 years ago now, it is no longer doing science. Also, Vera Rubin was not afraid to contradict Newton, that’s not how science works and would be a logical fallacy. The issue with Dark Matter is that we can detect different effects in different galaxies, thereby showing that there are different concentrations of it, it is not simply a matter of gravity working differently on large scales.

[@DawgPro]

Because It's a 12 years old Doc. 06/12/2012 - Diffusion sur Arte "Le mystère de la matière noire"

[@ZeroAlligator]

@@DawgPro wondering why it was posted 9 days ago with no acknowledgement of that in the title, video, or description…

[@tonybacky2193]

If we can see back in time to the Big Bang, then how do we know the universe is expanding or even be able to see that ? Time zones created by men who do not create themselves on a planet spinnng in a circle does not change distance on the ground or in space. I say good day.

[@als2cents679]

How do you know it is not a neutrino or some radioactive decay that is causing the detection.

[@doghouse100148]

Are there galaxies without a black hole in the middle?

[@therealmiddy]

Read Plotinus. Dark matter is just the Nous. The timeless and perfect true form of everything of which our perceived universe is a mere reflection.

[@JonathanJollimore-w9v]

Could matter be dark because it's not inside vacuum yet but entering the quantum field if visualized our universe as blackhole gobbling up stuff

[@Neuterlab]

Barry Allen and Dr Wells entered the chat

[@michaelkahn8744]

4-D Hypershere model of Universe can easily explain Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Void and even the reason why the measurement values of Expansion Rate are around 70 km/sec-Mpc Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Gravity, Void and Antigravity, ... all these are same phenomena. They just look different. The problem of modern physics is they're trying to explain everything with particle physics and the physics is being cornered more and more to the dead end. To escape the dead end, they invent or design another imaginary particle in vain instead of trying to revise their way to approach to the problem. I agree to the idea that the interaction between mass and space must be explained with quantum mechanics. But that doesn't mean gravity is the QM phenomena. That's because gravity is not a force. Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Gravity, Antigravity, Void... all these are just joint effects of the expansion of the Universe and the curvature of spacetime. Details are given below. Einstein’s theory of General Relativity states that spacetime is curved by the presence of mass. This curvature influences the motion other objects with mass and gives rise to gravitation. Thus, gravity is a result of geometric features in spacetime. However, we also observe gravitational effects - curvature of spacetime - in areas without any detectable mass. This has given rise to the concept of dark matter, which is matter that does not interact in any detectable way with normal matter, except through gravity. So, there is some large quantity of dark matter scattered throughout the universe, which curves spacetime and causes gravitational effects just like normal matter, but we cannot see or detect it with any known method. An alternative theory to the identity of dark matter is proposed - it is not matter at all, but rather an intrinsic curvature of spacetime. In other words, spacetime is not naturally flat. Even in the absence of matter, we observe some inherent curvature of spacetime. So, the question is now - why is spacetime naturally curved? Why is it not flat in the absence of mass? The universe is 4-dimensional, with 3 spatial dimensions and one dimension in time. Rather than consider time as a linear dimension, we can consider it as a radial one. Therefore, rather than describing the universe with a Cartesian coordinate system, we describe it with a 4-dimensional spherical coordinate system - 3 angular coordinates, φ1, φ2, φ3, and one radial coordinate in time, t. We live on the 3-dimensional surface of a 4-dimensional bubble which is expanding radially in time. Thus, the Big Bang represents t=0, the beginning of time. The crucial point is that the expansion of the universe is not homogeneous in all directions. The expansion rate at one point on the bubble’s surface may differ slightly from another point near it. The universe is only roughly spherical in 4 dimensions, the same way that the Earth is only roughly spherical in 3 dimensions. The same way we observe local mountains and valleys on the surface of Earth, we observe local “mountains” and “valleys” on the surface of the universe bubble. The inhomogeneity of the expansion of the universe has given rise to natural curvature of spacetime. This natural curvature causes the phenomenon of “dark matter”. “Valleys” in spacetime pull matter in, similarly to the warping of spacetime of massive objects. So “dark matter” is really “valleys” in spacetime that are expanding slower than the regions surrounding it. These valleys tend to pull matter in and create planets, stars, and galaxies - regions of space with higher-than-average densities of mass. Conversely, “mountains” in spacetime will repel matter away, an “anti-gravitational” effect, which gives rise to cosmic voids in space where we observe no matter. Each point on the surface of the universe bubble traces out a time arrow in 4-dimensional space, perpendicular to the surface. These time arrows are not parallel to each other since the universe is not flat. This causes points to have nonzero relative velocity away from each other. It is generally accepted that the universe is expanding faster than observable energy can explain, and this is expansion is believe to be still accelerating. The “missing” energy required to explain these observations has given rise to the theory of dark energy. The time dilation caused by non-parallel time arrows can be proposed as an explanation for dark energy. Alternatively, dark energy is real energy coming from potential energy gradients caused by non-parallel time arrows. As a sanity check, we can calculate the expansion rate of the universe based on the universe bubble model. Since the radius of the universe bubble is expanding at the speed of light in the time direction, it increases at 1 light second per second. Therefore, the “circumference” of the 3-dimensional surface increases by 2π light seconds per second, or about 1.88*10^6 km/s. This expansion is distributed equally across the 3-dimensional surface, so the actual observed expansion rate is proportional to the distance from the observer. At present, the age of the universe is estimated to be 13.8 billion years, so the radius of the universe bubble is 13.8 billion light years, or about 4233 megaparsecs (3.26 million light years to 1 Mpc). Thus, we can calculate the expansion rate of the universe, per megaparsec from the observer, as: Expansion rate = ((d(circumference))/dt)/radiusofuniverse=(1.88*〖10〗^6 km⁄s)/(2π*4233Mpc)=(1.88*〖10〗^6 km⁄s)/26598Mpc=70.82(km⁄s)/Mpc The popularly accepted empirical expansion rate is 73.5 +/- 2.5 km/s/Mpc, so our calculated value is close. There may be some additional source of expansion (or observed red shift) to make up for the discrepancy. For example, if two adjacent points have some gravitational gradient due to non-parallel time arrows, then light passing through these points will be red-shifted. - From www.academia.edu/82481487/Title_Alternative_Explanation_of_Dark_Matter_and_Dark_Energy

[@jaymakormik6779]

Dark matter is what the 99% of space inside of atoms is. Dark matter is also what consciously controls the assembly of proton/neutron counts and their quark charges ,leading to the acquiring of the electrons via attraction to comprise the elements of all. You are 99% visceral consciousness ,or " dark matter". Times' ? of the yaer.

[@brianstelter7067]

Darkmatter= fudge factor. There is no such thing as dark matter. It's how a scientist says 'I don't know"😂😂😂😂😂

[@Davidsavage8008]

There are 2 types of fools, one that fools with nature , and one that's fooled by IT. Be thankful 🎉 and you'll never be a fool......🎉

[@sabirsadiq-ys9po]

Write in google: singularity sphere in the heart of black hole

[@johnevans693]

I wonder if dark matter is a byproduct of blackholes.

[@cr1424]

Mystery solved, it is magnetism.

[@jamesdolan4042]

I want to, but I cannot make a meaningful contribution here. Besides the fact I don't have enough knowledge, my comment if made would be superfluous and superficial.

[@DanielVerberne]

Yours is a better comment than most already. I'm curious and keen and I'm a layperson. Just being curious is an excellent trait.

[@arunavadasgupta2147]

When two Atmos collide in the universe Then Many Nano particles of Atoms spread

[@kovy689]

Old video

[@hakimghadiali8600]

The universe is all algebra 🧐

[@vukans595]

Just one word, Aether!

[@EricaFiore]

Rips in space time?. Pull plasticene out like a pizza you get rips in the Plasticene as the universe is expanding then would it not suggest the same?. Rips happen then close so could be happening all over the universe?.

[@HanSDevX]

Dark matter is the matrix

[@propgee]

Why not modify newton's equations

[@rienkhoek4169]

One reason is that there are also galaxies that do conform to normal newtonian laws. You can't have modified newtonian models and normal newtonian laws at the same time.

[@il3mendo]

Does then the dark matter has his own weight creating gravity and order ?

[@NATHANIELTYLER-m2f]

This is N.T LHC we determined it is the time between our electron and, our protons and , our neutron was proven by a faster than the light. The Motion linear scales have on its self

[@AhsanAlam-v9s]

Is the matter we can build

[@NATHANIELTYLER-m2f]

Can I comment, trek with 3lines.

[@ronaldsanchez1341]

It's cosmic soot.

[@jameselliott216]

I'm made of atoms? Pffffffffft! I'm made of chicken, spaghetti, steak, cinnamon toast crunch cereal, corn dogs, coffee. . .

[@robertpotvin8872]

find light that is traveling faster then the standard model says it does,,,meaning the dark matter is more dence there,,this matter is determining the speed of light, like other waves ,dencer the medium they travel in,,the faster the waves travels,,,in the beginnig, say just after the big bang the dark matter was dencer that is why lght travelled faster and universe was expending way faster beeing pushed by that dence dark matter,,,,,,this invisible matter is what is creating gravity,it,s being compressed by matter ,bigger that matter the more compression so greater gravity,,,this is the sp/time fabric of the universe,,,,,well maybe this is just a crazy idea

[@FasbrookMunroe-o3b]

If u find out what Dark Matter is u mite not live so to find out what or who is God the Father is u will not live read Genesis one - four the full or whole chapter then u will understand what I"m talking about in the Holy Bible please look in to it.

[@Ai-he1dp]

Where can i get investment for my nothings.

[@imaseeker100]

Why must all these astronomy docs have this horrid backround music?

[@zahidhabib9149]

Dead people soul from dark matter and dark energy.

[@hilurmohammed2023]

All praise is for Allah Who created the heavens and the earth and made darkness and light. Yet the disbelievers set up equals to their Lord ˹in worship˺. Holy Qur'an - 6:1

[@thorthunder6336]

5th dimension space water.

[@alexandredemar]

So what do we know? nothing! ...lol...Here is what we do know, whoever, or whatever created dark matter is not human! . lol .. But seriously speaking, dark matter is the basis of our reality. There has to be an alternate reality. If dark matter was created by whoever or whatever, then that means that whoever or whatever is from something different than our dark matter. That means that there is something somewhere else!! therefore another reality. This could be on a scale that we cant even imagine! My question is , " is the dark matter inside or outside of what we can see of the visible universe?.