He didn't defy it, it merely didn't affect him. See Council of Elrond, FotR. Bombadil is merely a genus locii, his power is nigh supreme where he resides but that is all. If Sauron had his ring and attacked, Bombadil dies.
@StoriesoftheRings19 күн бұрын
You’re absolutely right-Bombadil doesn’t resist the Ring; it simply doesn’t register in his world. As Gandalf and Elrond note during the Council, Bombadil’s power is immense within his domain, but it’s entirely localized. He embodies harmony with his environment, making him more a protector of his small realm than a player in the larger struggle of Middle-earth. Don’t forget to subscribe for more lore-filled discussions. What do you think would happen if Sauron ever truly clashed with Bombadil? Let’s discuss!
@victoriakidd-cromis112421 күн бұрын
Bombadil frustrates me. And the fact that Tolkein did it deliberately is maddening. The idea that makes the most sense to me is that he is a manifestation of Eru Illuvatar. The fact that Gandalf goes to have a long tak with Bombadil instead of going to the Shire with the hobbits seems significant. After all, Eru Illuvatar was the one who sent Gandalf back after he died as a result of the battle with the balrog. And by sending him back he allowed Gandalf to use more of the power he couldn't use as Gandalf the Gray. If Eru was Tom then he and Gandalf coud have face to face discussions in a way that couldn't happen if Eru stayed as this amorphis being who is so far above everything and everyone else that he can't be felt as someone that any being could have a conersation with ever.
@StoriesoftheRings20 күн бұрын
You bring up an incredibly thought-provoking theory! The idea of Bombadil as a manifestation of Eru Ilúvatar makes sense in many ways-his immunity to the Ring, his carefree yet immensely powerful nature, and the unique dynamic it could create between him and Gandalf. If Gandalf did seek Bombadil out for guidance or wisdom before heading to the Shire, it could signify a moment of grounding or alignment with Eru’s will, which fits beautifully with your observation about Gandalf’s return as Gandalf the White. Tolkien’s genius lies in leaving these threads for us to unravel, even if it’s frustrating at times! You’re absolutely right-having Eru in a relatable form like Bombadil allows for that personal connection and dialogue, which is otherwise impossible given Eru’s divine nature. Thank you for sharing such a rich perspective! Be sure to subscribe to the channel for more deep dives into Middle-earth’s mysteries. Let’s keep exploring these fascinating ideas together!
@denniskrust213720 күн бұрын
See Council of Elrond, Galdor and Glorfindel statements particularly, as well as Elrond and Gandolf.
@lordcrakkin96520 күн бұрын
Bombadil represents several groups of people. The hippie, the non-violent, the objectors, the pacifist…to put it short, Switzerland. Tolkien was a man of war and poetry. Here is a character that is powerful and charming, but in the battle of good versus evil, he will not choose a side. How many families were hurt because Tom chose NOT to take the ring and flop it into the volcano? His indifference caused pain and misery and torture. He is no hero. He is implicit in his lack of actions. He doesn’t care and that is his failing. Bomba is a warning to us all NOT to put up our walls and make a “sanctuary” and then forget about the world outside. The world needs good men and women to help fight the darkness. Sorry so long, but this is a deep subject.
@StoriesoftheRings20 күн бұрын
Thank you for sharing your thoughts! Tom Bombadil sparks such deep discussions, and that’s what makes him fascinating. Whether you see him as a symbol of neutrality or a missed opportunity for action, his character challenges us to think about the balance between detachment and responsibility. We’d love to hear more perspectives like yours! Don’t forget to subscribe to the channel for more deep dives into Tolkien’s world, and join us as we explore the mysteries and lessons of Middle-earth. Let’s keep the conversation going!