Thank you so much for posting this I finished caves of steel and couldn’t find the next one in the series anywhere, I’ve always loved getting immersed in an Asimov world
@runforrestrun19658 ай бұрын
So much better narrated here than one I tried that frankly was a monotonous drone of a voice! Thank you for putting this version up.😊
@rezzer79183 ай бұрын
Theyre doing it for $ not as a favor to you or anyone lol 🙄
@SilverLining1Ай бұрын
@@rezzer7918next you'll tell us you refuse to say thank you to waiters because it's their job. It's just politeness my dude
@boris0106662 ай бұрын
I am so glad that people uploaded all these favorite books I read decades ago! Thank you!
@Calum-q9j4 ай бұрын
Wonderful narrator! It can make or break a book, especially an Asimov book, where you're asked to sit and masticate on the ideas. Thanks for sharing
@rezzer79183 ай бұрын
You mean ruminate not masticate lol
@Calum-q9j3 ай бұрын
@@rezzer7918 I said what I meant, so... no? xD
@frisiancoil2 ай бұрын
I often wonder how Asimov would have progressed his stories, if he had lived in this century, with our current oddeties.
@jamesrutherford11322 ай бұрын
I recommend End of Eternity for anyone who hasn't read it.j
@scottmasson33365 ай бұрын
And when was this story written guys?....the days before flash special effects and fast story lines. Compare the narrative to early 1950's sci fi films.
@rezzer79183 ай бұрын
"guys" lol
@thefrener7943 ай бұрын
@@rezzer7918But you get the point, this may not be for you. This is for more stable minds.
@mathiasf.874911 ай бұрын
Bookmark: 2:26:51
@cheater55610 ай бұрын
Bookmark: 37:24
@cheater55610 ай бұрын
3:45:06
@cheater55610 ай бұрын
5:03:00
@cheater55610 ай бұрын
7:06:00
@cheater55610 ай бұрын
Final thoughts (Spoilers): Throughout the robot series there has been a transition taking place where robots are becoming progressively more dangerous to humans. From the short stories in I, Robot where a robot lies or hallucinates, to the caves of steel where a robot carries a murder weapon, to this book where the robot is the murder weapon. We are seeing Asimov set the stage for the robot revolution which will see the robots being the threat instead of being the instruments of threat.
@holz_name7 ай бұрын
2:52:55
@wntu410 ай бұрын
What a sick and demented society.
@douglasdoo4 ай бұрын
😊😊😊@Embassy_of_Jupiter
@swiftmatic4 ай бұрын
Which one? Earth? Or Solaria?
@CrichtonChristian-l9j3 ай бұрын
Jackson Michael Davis Steven Garcia Lisa
@runforrestrun19658 ай бұрын
Daneel speaking with emotional responses is very odd. How could he be “happy” to see Bailey? Other incidences too, I thought robots couldn’t express or feel emotions?
@Michelle-Eden6 ай бұрын
A painting or a song can express emotions to human observers, but the canvas or the sound waves don't _feel_ those emotions.
@darksideofthesand4 ай бұрын
I think it's important to remember Daneel was designed to fit in with and emulate humans. If your programed to be able to blend in with humans you would talk like them even if you didn't understand or feel that way.
@DaisyJones116taurus3 ай бұрын
Read the first book “caves of steel” or listen to the whole book. Daneel explains the robots feel “good” or pleasant when they achieve goals and are doing what they are designed to do and negative “emotions”(for lack of a better term) when they fail. The positronic brain is the most complex machine made by man(in this series) and an ai robot brain had to be able to think positively and negatively to perform. If an oven had a brain it might be pleased if it helps you cook and upset if it burns the food. Daneel was built to be as human as possible and his main function was to study and understand people(of earth). It’s 100% feasible for his robot brain to feel pleased that a human remembered and was happy to see him…it’s part of his programming. Actually…read I robot, the short stories in that book explain the development and recognition of robot “feelings” from the conception of the fictional positronic brain.
@chriselyr248416 күн бұрын
@@DaisyJones116taurusiirc, even this book mentions it.... Robots feel something akin to discomfort when considering something that goes against the 4 laws... Some may argue that's just guilt, shame, or conscience.
@adrianrosenlund-hudson87895 ай бұрын
Slow, plodding and boring. What killed it for me was the resistance of the character that replaced the poisoned man.
@chriselyr248416 күн бұрын
Sorry you have such a short attention span kiddo
@holz_name7 ай бұрын
I try to like Isaac Asimov but not really. Most of his stories are really dry. Who likes more character driven stories should give Stanislaw Lem a try.
@MundumVisum7 ай бұрын
I get what you mean. Asimov was a very technical person. He not only wrote science fiction, but wrote scientific papers. A lot of that is actual science meets imagination. Where Lem has a more fantasy approach to his writing. Thanks. Ill see if there is any Lem to adapt.
@holz_name7 ай бұрын
@@MundumVisum I'm pleasantly surprised by The Naked Sun, it's a character driven story. The Foundation and I Robot were quite dry.
@THEmomentumJUNK1E4 ай бұрын
I know what you mean. Try Asimov's short story: The Last Question. It's gripping at every single word, and is anything but dry.
@THEmomentumJUNK1E4 ай бұрын
@@holz_name Asimov is indeed a bit dry and technical. He didn't really have the story-telling component locked down. Arthur C. Clarke on the other hand, had the story-telling component LOCKED! I've very much enjoyed his works. He understood how to capture the reader in a riotus extacy between imagination and contemplation. He used science as a means to command depth unto his concepts. He was visionary in his explicitly. Like Einstien, he was not a man of science... he was the becoming of truth, as beholden unto man by what his science need be.