I love your reasoning on this topic! Your channel has certainly been a blessing to many who have been deceived by the Watchtower’s teachings. I can’t wait to hear your next video on what Jesus true nature is if he isn’t an angel. May Jehovah continue using you in helping people learn the truth about Watchtowers false teachings.
@justinhemion62798 ай бұрын
Gods Word(the bible) tells us about Christ and who He "is"..... in the book of Matthew1:"23 it is clearly shown to us .... " Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name "EMMANUEL", which being INTERPRETED is, GOD WITH US" matthew1:23 that makes it oh so very clear 'who' Jesus Christ 'IS'!!! anyone who truly does their 'due-diligence' and takes the time to actually and unbiasedly look into the theology and doctrines of 'man-made' religions, will come to find that MORE THAN ANYTHING ELSE what those religions all try to do more than anything else is to try and rob, steal and destroy the TRUTH in Gods revealed Word, and they will try to REMOVE the DIETY of Christ! these are those the bible speaks of in referring to those who will come 'preaching ANOTHER Jesus".... i urge all of you to SEEK THE LORD WHILE HE MAY BE FOUND! ALL GLORY, ALL PRAISE, ALL HONOR BE UNTO MY GOD AND LORD CHRIST JESUS! AMEN!
@brucebarnard8 ай бұрын
There is a KZbin channel, NWT Defended, which has a good video which clearly shows why the Son of God who became Jesus Christ is Michael the archangel. Its entitled The Case for Jesus being Michael the Archangel(NWT). Check it out.
@thelightgetsbrighterexjw30848 ай бұрын
@@brucebarnard No Thanks. Nowhere in the scriptures does it teach that!
@brucebarnard8 ай бұрын
@@thelightgetsbrighterexjw3084 Your decision. Still, many non-JW sources do teach it.
@rogerkirkpatrick52565 жыл бұрын
Wow! This is awesome, Eric (Beroean Pickets)! You nailed it with scripture and with solid, brilliant reasoning. You have put Watchtower's so-called "faithful and discreet slave" to shame.
@brucebarnard8 ай бұрын
There is a KZbin channel, NWT Defended, which has a good video which clearly shows why the Son of God who became Jesus Christ is Michael the archangel. Its entitled The Case for Jesus being Michael the Archangel(NWT). Check it out.
Excellent, logical and methodical consideration of this topic that I've been wondering about. Thanks so much. I look forward to future videos from you.
@goodstuffohhyeah4 жыл бұрын
Imagine a video of Eric Wilson vs Robert King on this topic? Would be an interesting discussion since they are both extremely well versed in the Bible but have different views on this subject.
@philipyoung93002 жыл бұрын
@@goodstuffohhyeah e
@philipyoung93002 жыл бұрын
No
@philipyoung93002 жыл бұрын
@@goodstuffohhyeah ok m on as
@ChrisPyle2 жыл бұрын
Thanks to your Videos, my girlfriend and I are going to create a spread sheet of all the JW stuff we were taught as kids and all the actual Bible truths. It feels incredible to have access to all this information and understanding. Just wanted to say thank you!
@brucebarnard8 ай бұрын
There is a KZbin channel, NWT Defended, which has a good video which clearly shows why the Son of God who became Jesus Christ is Michael the archangel. Its entitled The Case for Jesus being Michael the Archangel(NWT). Check it out.
@ChrisPyle8 ай бұрын
@@brucebarnard I will! Thank you
@georgiaroberts93855 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your clear well-presented explanation. Your love for truth shines.
@aleset15 жыл бұрын
I had never questioned this for some reason. Thank you so much for your calm, methodical and intelligent discussions of Bible truths.
@eriq543215 жыл бұрын
It's also an explanation of Michael as christ in the footnotes of Daniel 12:1 and 10:13 , also the footnotes of john chapter 1 in the 1599 Geneva bible (gnv) , the Geneva bible can be found at biblegateway.com . Geneva bible is the 1st English bible before the king James .
@kewlleleven97714 жыл бұрын
Mr. Eric Wilson, 💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖May our Lord and God Jesus Christ bless you, Thank you , thank you, thank you. You are the best. I left the JW , Which is a fake organization but I never lost my love and trust in God.
@marvalice34553 жыл бұрын
I mean, it's a real organization, but that is the problem. like all bureaucracy, it cares far more about justifying its own existence than about doing the thing it was created to do.
@brucebarnard8 ай бұрын
There is a KZbin channel, NWT Defended, which has a good video which clearly shows why the Son of God who became Jesus Christ is Michael the archangel. Its entitled The Case for Jesus being Michael the Archangel(NWT). Check it out.
@markandrew49745 жыл бұрын
Hahaha, i was just looking for you at 5 am this morning and now here you are Eric 🤗 OK grrreat! On to your video, ☺
@BenchPresaPower5 жыл бұрын
mark andrew, I find myself doing that very thing daily 😊
@laurentianvmx16925 жыл бұрын
Thanks for all do do Eric ! Love you bro.
@irishhomedeemob6775 жыл бұрын
Great stuff ..keep it coming ! Just to add... If Jude wanted to high light, as a dogmatic life saving doctrine, that the lord Jesus was formerly Michael, he would have stressed this in his letter. V 9 However, his letter implies that Michael and Jesus the lord, were *not* one and the same person.
@brucebarnard8 ай бұрын
There is a KZbin channel, NWT Defended, which has a good video which clearly shows why the Son of God who became Jesus Christ is Michael the archangel. Its entitled The Case for Jesus being Michael the Archangel(NWT). Check it out.
@sinemetu90375 жыл бұрын
Thanks Eric...great reasoning. It’s wonderful to be able to openly watch and discuss such things outside of the orgs one and only way of thinking. I watched the AGM recently...amazing still to hear them call themselves “the channel”...in other words the mouth piece of God. When will they enter reality? Looking forward to the next video.
@brucebarnard8 ай бұрын
There is a KZbin channel, NWT Defended, which has a good video which clearly shows why the Son of God who became Jesus Christ is Michael the archangel. Its entitled The Case for Jesus being Michael the Archangel(NWT). Check it out.
@BenchPresaPower5 жыл бұрын
Thank you once again for such a marvellous video, I was eagerly awaiting for you to shed light on this topic.. it gives me a great basis for my own research. Have a blessed day, and much love to you Brother
@brucebarnard8 ай бұрын
There is a KZbin channel, NWT Defended, which has a good video which clearly shows why the Son of God who became Jesus Christ is Michael the archangel. Its entitled The Case for Jesus being Michael the Archangel(NWT). Check it out.
@cbringuez665 жыл бұрын
Finally I find an easy explanation of this. Thank you for helping me understand the truth.
@brucebarnard8 ай бұрын
There is a KZbin channel, NWT Defended, which has a good video which clearly shows why the Son of God who became Jesus Christ is Michael the archangel. Its entitled The Case for Jesus being Michael the Archangel(NWT). Check it out.
@salms775 ай бұрын
Galatians 4:14 14 And though my physical condition was a trial for you, you did not treat me with contempt or disgust; but you received me like an angel of God, like Christ Jesus.
@kewlleleven97715 жыл бұрын
Thank you Mr. Wilson, I love your videos, may Jehovah God bless you, yes you nailed this topic. Please can you make a video if Jesus is God or not. May God bless u
@phillbobaggins59625 жыл бұрын
He is not God, no need of a video for that, though I'm sure Eric would oblige, Jesus own words should be enough to overturn the Trinity doctrine.
@jerrycaudle29345 жыл бұрын
@@phillbobaggins5962Do you recall what claims the Jewish religious leaders used to condemn Jesus? John 5:17,18 - “My Father has been working until now, and I have been working.” Therefore the Jews sought to kill Him, because He not only broke the Sabbath, but also said that God was His Father, making Himself equal with God. Some people claim to believe that Jesus was a “good man, a prophet, or an angel”, but they deny that Jesus is God. If that is you, I would like to encourage you to consider some of these Bible verses :Matthew 1:23 - “Behold, the virgin shall be with child, and bear a Son, and they shall call His name Immanuel,” which is translated, “God with us.” Isaiah 9:6 - For unto us a Child is born, Unto us a Son is given; And the government will be upon His shoulder. And His name will be called Wonderful, Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace. Isaiah 43:10,11 - “You are My witnesses,” says the Lord, “And My servant whom I have chosen, That you may know and believe Me, and understand that I am He. Before Me there was no God formed, Nor shall there be after Me. I, even I, am the Lord, and besides Me there is no Savior.” Revelation 1:17-18; Revelation 2:8 - (Jesus is the First and the Last) Isaiah 44:6 - (God is the Redeemer) 2 Peter 1:1 (Jesus is the Redeemer) - “To those who have obtained like precious faith with us by the righteousness of our God and Savior Jesus Christ” Isaiah 44:24 - (God created the world by Himself alone) John 1:3; Colossians 1:16 - (Jesus made all things) John 1:1-3 - In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made... 1:14 - And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, John 5:17,18 - “My Father has been working until now, and I have been working.” Therefore the Jews sought to kill Him, because He not only broke the Sabbath, but also said that God was His Father, making Himself equal with God. John 5:23 - that all should honor the Son just as they honor the Father. He who does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent Him. John 8:24 - “Therefore I said to you that you will die in your sins; for if you do not believe that I AM [He], you will die in your sins.” John 8:58 - Then Jesus said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I AM.” John 10:30-33 - Jesus answered them, “I and My Father are one.” Then the Jews took up stones again to stone Him. Jesus answered them, “Many good works I have shown you from My Father. For which of those works do you stone Me?” The Jews answered Him, saying, “For a good work we do not stone You, but for blasphemy, and because You, being a Man, make Yourself God.” John 14:6-7 - Jesus said to him, “I AM the way, the truth, and the Life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.” John 14:9-11 - Jesus said to him, “Have I been with you so long and yet you have not known Me, Philip? He who has seen Me has seen the Father; so how can you say, 'Show us the Father'?” John 20:28 - And Thomas answered and said to Him, “My Lord and my God!” Acts 4:12 - “Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.” Acts 20:28 - (God purchased us with His own blood) Revelation 1:5-6; Revelation 5:8-9 - (Jesus' blood purchased us) Philippians 2:5-7 - Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus, who, being in the form of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal with God, but made Himself of no reputation, taking the form of a bond-servant, and coming in the likeness of men. Colossians 2:9 - For in Him dwells all the fullness of the Godhead bodily 1 Timothy 3:16 - And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifested in the flesh, Justified in the Spirit, Seen by angels, Preached among the Gentiles, Believed on in the world, Received up in glory. Titus 2:13 - looking for the blessed hope and glorious appearing of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ Hebrews 1:8-9 - But to the Son He says: “Your throne, O God, is forever and ever; A scepter of righteousness is the scepter of Your kingdom. You have loved righteousness and hated lawlessness; Therefore God, Your God, has anointed You with the oil of gladness more than Your companions.” 2 John 1:7 - For many deceivers have gone out into the world who do not confess Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist. Revelation 1:8 - “I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End,” says the Lord, “who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty.” Revelation 22:13 - “I AM the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End, the First and the Last.”... 22:16 - “I, Jesus, have sent My angel to testify to you these things in the churches.” 1 Timothy 6:14-16 - “our Lord Jesus Christ's appearing, which He will manifest in His own time, He who is the blessed and only Potentate, the King of kings and Lord of lords, who alone has immortality, dwelling in unapproachable light, whom no man has seen or can see, to whom be honor and everlasting power. Amen.” Hebrews 2:17-18 - “Therefore, in all things He had to be made like His brethren, that He might be a merciful and faithful High Priest in things pertaining to God, to make propitiation for the sins of the people. For in that He Himself has suffered, being tempted, He is able to aid those who are tempted.” Hebrews 4:15-16 - “For we do not have a High Priest who cannot sympathize with our weaknesses, but was in all points tempted as we are, yet without sin. Let us therefore come boldly to the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy and find grace to help in time of need.” 1 Peter 2:24 - “who Himself bore our sins in His own body on the tree, that we having died to sins, might live for righteousness - by whose stripes you were healed.” He went from sovereignty to shame and from deity to death? Why!? For you. bugman123.com/Bible/JesusIsGod.html
@t.macneil70485 жыл бұрын
@@jerrycaudle2934 Well done all praise and glory to our Lord! God bless.
@arlittleredfox76715 жыл бұрын
WOW! Your research is spot on. Some of the things I was thinking, you mentioned. Also, The 'Word' was begotten, not created like Angels. And after his ascension to heaven the name Jesus is the one we use and call on for our salvation. Not Jehovah, ........jws.
@archieliburd43275 жыл бұрын
So then 1 John 4 v 12 to 15 is a lie? Are you saying that?
@arlittleredfox76715 жыл бұрын
The Bible doesn't lie. But your Scripture say nothing about Jesus being an Angel or not
@donald23065 жыл бұрын
@@arlittleredfox7671 Isaiah 9:6 (Greek Septuaguint LXX) "For a child is born to us, and a son is given to us, whose government is upon his shoulder: and his name is called the MESSENGER (ANGEL) of great counsel: for I will bring peace upon the princes, and health to him." Galatians 4:14 "And though my physical condition was a trial for you, you did not treat me with contempt or disgust; but you received me LIKE AN ANGEL OF GOD, LIKE JESUS CHRIST." The apostle Paul did not make comparison between Jesus Christ as an angel of God without very good reason. Jesus not only describes his own origin at Prov.8:22-30 as being part of creation but also refers to himself there as the master worker beside his Father. He later prayed at John 17:5 to be returned to his former position "with the glory that I had alongside you" (as the master worker) "before the earth was" in perfect harmony with what is described at Prov.8:22-30.
@donald23065 жыл бұрын
@@arlittleredfox7671 You are right. The bible is very clear and it does not lie. There is only ONE voice the dead will hear at the resurrection: John 5:25, 28, 29 "Most truly I say to you, the hour is coming, and it is now, when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who have paid attention will live. 28 Do not be amazed at this, for the hour is coming in which all those in the memorial tombs will hear his voice 29 and come out, those who did good things to a resurrection of life....." Both Daniel 12:1, 2 and 1Thessalonians 4:16 make it very clear that the person of primary importance at the resurrection is the Archangel and the ONLY voice heard at the resurrection is the voice of the Archangel. No other voice is mentioned at this extremely important event. John 5 states that this voice mentioned at 1Thessalonians belongs to the Son of God....PERIOD!!! They will hear his voice and come out (John 5) and the Lord will descend with the voice of an Archangel and the dead will rise (1Thessalonians). This is so clear that it is no longer a topic worth discussing.
@arlittleredfox76715 жыл бұрын
Isaiah 9:6 calls Jesus, 'Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.' Not an Angel, not a messenger. Gal. 4:14 the reference is to his level of treatment from the people. Not a comparison of Jesus to an Angel. Proverbs 8:22-30. The word "before" is used as a time line to indicate his "being" or "existing" before other things. Not created with them. Heb. 1:5-14. Jesus is not an Angel John 3:16. Jesus is "the" only begotten Son, not an Angel FINALLY: If Jesus was begotten, (same material as the Father,) then your saying 'THE FATHER' is an Angel? GOD is not an Angel. So neither is Jesus. They are a different type of spirit being that is greater than all creation.
@jacibledsoe96475 жыл бұрын
Eric, excellent, thorough, and well done. I hope another one comes soon. Cliffhangers make me crazy...lol. Regarding Christ returning with the shout of an archangel. They have changed the article from "an" to "the" thus changing the meaning. The Complete Jewish Study Bible has an interesting rendition of 1 Thes. 4:16: "For the Lord himself will come down from heaven with a rousing cry, with a call from one of the ruling angels, and with God’s shofar; those who died united with the Messiah will be the first to rise; " Also, I realize that although Enoch did not make it into our scriptures it was accepted by Jude at the time of his writing. I looked into Enoch and found this: XX. Name and Functions of the Seven Archangels. CHAPTER XX. "1. And these are the names of the holy angels who watch. 2. Uriel, one of the holy angels, who is over the world and over Tartarus. 3. Raphael, one of the holy angels, who is over the spirits of men. 4. Raguel, one of the holy angels who takes vengeance on the world of the luminaries. 5. Michael, one of the holy angels, to wit, he that is set over the best part of mankind ⌈⌈and⌉⌉ over chaos. 6. Saraqâêl, one of the holy angels, who is set over the spirits, who sin in the spirit. 7. Gabriel, one of the holy angels, who is over Paradise and the serpents and the Cherubim. 8. Remiel, one of the holy angels, whom God set over those who rise."
@nocciolata3 жыл бұрын
Merci beaucoup pour les sous-titres en français, c'est infiniment appréciable !
@eew80605 жыл бұрын
What about the Gal. 4:14 argument? Galatians says: "and though my condition was a trial to you, you did not scorn or despise me, BUT received me AS an angel of God, AS Christ Jesus." Some try to say its two contrasting things. However the construction of: "...but as...as" is not used in a contrast by Paul. He is saying the two things are the same thing. 1 Cor 3:1 "Brothers I was not able to speak to you as spiritual people BUT AS fleshly people, AS infants in Christ" [fleshly people= infants in Christ] 2 Cor 2:17 "...BUT in Christ we speak AS persons of sincerity, AS persons sent from God.." [persons of sincerity= persons sent from God] This is the only three times Paul uses this "BUT AS...AS..." construction and its apparent how he uses it. There is evidence for an Angel Christology all over the Christian Greek text!
@BeroeanPickets5 жыл бұрын
You cannot base a doctrine on an ambiguous text. Galatians 4:14 can be spoken whether or not Jesus is an angel. If we accept that Jesus is not an angel, we can still express ourselves that way. If I say, "You accepted me as if one sent from God, as Jesus Christ himself." the thought still is valid. Yet you would not think that Jesus is a man because I am one, nor that I am a spirit because Jesus is one.
@eew80605 жыл бұрын
Beroean Pickets If the text alone is ambiguous, then studying the construction and comparing it to the other texts (as I have done) makes it more clear. At least textual probabilities must be given consideration and Paul's use of the "but as...as" construction makes it more probable than not that Paul speaks of Christ as the Angel of the Lord. And intrinsic evidence in Galatians! You said Galatians 3:9 speaks of "Moses". That's not necessarily true. If you look at FF Bruce commentary on Galatians he (building on Van Hoye) says that the mediator there is an Angel! The party of Angels was headed by a Principal Angel who mediated on behalf of God. Who was this Angelic mediator? D. Hannah in his book "Michael and Christ" hints at the fact that it could be Archangel Michael that met with Moses! (Hannah, being a Trinitarian scholar, later dismisses the idea. But his dismissal is far less convincing than the work Bruce put into the idea itself. He says something like: "Van Hoy's solution is ingenious! Perhaps too ingenious. The mediator may just as well be Moses as to be Michael"... And that's it! Hardly a well argued dismissal) Bruce (in Galatians) says it was like David meeting Goliath. The two individuals representing their respective camps on the battle field- but in this case it was Michael and Moses on Mount Sinai. And instead of combat it was covenant they were seeking. So Galatians isn't as ambiguous as you think.
@BeroeanPickets5 жыл бұрын
@@eew8060 Where did I say "Galatians 3:9 speaks of Moses"? Are you perhaps getting me mixed up with someone else?
@eew80605 жыл бұрын
Beroean Pickets You said it around 13:00-13:10 of your video. * Gal. 3:19 not 3:9...
@paulbrennan41632 жыл бұрын
Rather than interpreting 1 Thessalonians 4:16 as saying that Jesus was *_speaking_* with the voice of an archangel, I think what Paul meant was that he was *_accompanied_* by the voice of an archangel (and a trumpet call).
@brucebarnard8 ай бұрын
There is a KZbin channel, NWT Defended, which has a good video which clearly shows why the Son of God who became Jesus Christ is Michael the archangel. Its entitled The Case for Jesus being Michael the Archangel(NWT). Check it out.
@linoruggero3 жыл бұрын
Hi Eric. Thank you for your excellent presentation and explanation. This was the delicate sound of Thunder for those who degraded Jesus our King to archangel
@brucebarnard8 ай бұрын
There is a KZbin channel, NWT Defended, which has a good video which clearly shows why the Son of God who became Jesus Christ is Michael the archangel. Its entitled The Case for Jesus being Michael the Archangel(NWT). Check it out.
@donald23065 жыл бұрын
Both Daniel 12:1, 2 and 1Thessalonians 4:16 make it very clear that the person of primary importance at the resurrection is the Archangel and the ONLY voice heard at the resurrection is the voice of the Archangel. No other voice is mentioned at this extremely important event. John 5 states that this voice mentioned at 1Thessalonians belongs to the Son of God....PERIOD!!! They will hear his voice and come out (John 5) and the Lord will descend with the voice of an Archangel and the dead will rise (1Thessalonians). This is so clear that it is no longer a topic worth discussing.
@BeroeanPickets5 жыл бұрын
It may be clear to you, but you are overlooking some facts. If you are a Jehovah's Witness, you must listen and obey the Governing Body to be blessed. Their reasoning on Daniel 12:2 is as follows: * dp chap. 17 p. 291 pars. 9-10 Identifying True Worshipers in the Time of the End * In the Bible, resurrection sometimes has a spiritual significance. For example, both Ezekiel and Revelation contain prophetic passages that apply to a spiritual revival, or resurrection.-Ezekiel 37:1-14; Revelation 11:3, 7, 11. 10 Has there been such a spiritual revival of God’s anointed servants in the time of the end? Yes! It is a historical reality that in 1918 a small remnant of faithful Christians were subjected to an extraordinary attack that disrupted their organized public ministry. Then, against all likelihood, in 1919 they returned to life in a spiritual sense. However, the issue is one of timing. When did this spiritual resurrection occur? My next video will deal with that question.
@donald23065 жыл бұрын
@@BeroeanPickets Your answer to this is somewhere out in left field. If you're going to attempt to deceive people, you'll first have to eliminate the first statement made in this publication, namely "In the Bible, resurrection sometimes has a spiritual significance." The WBTS here was obviously speaking FIGURATIVELY in regard to the symbolic "two witnesses" spoken of at Revelation 11:3 and not in the literally sense of the actual resurrection of the dead as spoken of at Dan.12:2, John 5:25, 28, 29, and 1Thess.4:16. Their reasoning with you in regard to the literal resurrection would be the same as mine.....so don't quit your day job!
@BeroeanPickets5 жыл бұрын
I'm not going to argue this anymore with you. Two reasons. You're being disrespectful and argumentative. The other reason is that you speak without doing your research. I cited the Daniel book, chapter 17 p. 291 pars. 9-10 to prove that the organization agrees that Daniel 12:2 speaks of a figurative resurrection. You deny this. If you took the time to read the context carefully, you'd realize that the Organization is explaining that Daniel 12:2 had its fulfillment in 1918/1919. To quote your own words back to you without offence being given: "This is so clear that it is no longer a topic worth discussing."
@tootychristo12815 жыл бұрын
Eric: you are right my brother! If someone does not want the truth;no one can push it down his or her throat! A reasonable witness will see at least that there is not enough evidence to conclude that Michael is Jesus! On the other hand Even John 1:1-3 and Hebrews 1:5-9 alone suggest that even if Jesus had been Michael in his prehuman existence; God never wants us to continue to think of him as such because even the angels are commanded to worship him!
@brucebarnard8 ай бұрын
There is a KZbin channel, NWT Defended, which has a good video which clearly shows why the Son of God who became Jesus Christ is Michael the archangel. Its entitled The Case for Jesus being Michael the Archangel(NWT). Check it out.
@fangenesis1 Жыл бұрын
Thank you, i consider you my true Brother....It was a few times that I' Ve been looking for the Truth, because i have understood there was something wrong in Jeovah' s Witnesses...After 30 Years, but i see now it' s the right times
@sunshinegreen51644 жыл бұрын
Praised be the Lord, for His Truth has set you free!!!! To now become a follower of our high priest Yeshua, His anointed one. Shalom!
@phillbobaggins59625 жыл бұрын
To add further: Is Michael Only One of Many? Daniel 10:13 is probably the most difficult verse regarding Michael: "But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days: but, lo, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me." It appears at first glance that Michael is only "one of" the chief princes. This is an unfortunate translation in the King James. The word "one" comes from the Hebrew word "echad," which is also frequently translated as "first," as in the president's wife being called "first lady." (See Genesis 1:5; 8:13.) This changes the whole meaning of the verse to Michael being first of, greatest or highest of, to the chief of princes-again a reference to Jesus. The prince of the kingdom of Persia who withstood the angel was no doubt the devil who frequently appears working in the shadow of earthly monarchs such as the king of Babylon, the king of Tyre, and the Roman power (Isaiah 14:4, Ezekiel 28:2, Revelation 12:4). And remember that Jesus calls Satan "the prince of this world" (John 12:31). Daniel 10:21 says, "But I will show thee that which is noted in the scripture of truth: and there is none that holdeth with me in these things, but Michael your prince." Notice here that the angel refers to Michael as your Prince. Who was Daniel’s prince? In the previous chapter, we see the answer. In Daniel 9:25, Daniel’s Messiah is called the prince, which is another clear indication of Michael’s identity! So Gabriel is saying that Michael the archangel is Jesus, who knows all the truth of Scripture. Michael Stands Up Good read here also Eric: www.endtimes-bibleprophecy.com/is-michael-jesus-bible.html
@gawiehellofathing45755 жыл бұрын
I am completely stumbled by your goatie :-) Keep up the awesome work !!!
@JamMack5 жыл бұрын
I always wondered who really are the holy ones mentioned in Daniel your explanation reasoning from Gods word helped me to connect the dots!
@albusai5 жыл бұрын
Jam Mack the watchers
@joha7905 жыл бұрын
Hebrews 1 - But to which of the angels di he ever say You are My Son, today I have begotten You. Or to what angel did He ever say Sit on my right hand until I make your enemies your footstool. :) Therefore God, Your God has anointed you with the oil of joy above your fellows, i.e. other men! Amen to what you said about His being Man (as well as God).
@maxinericheson92103 жыл бұрын
He (God Almighty EL) never said to any angel “thou art my son!
@donald23065 жыл бұрын
The bible is very clear. There is only ONE voice the dead will hear at the resurrection: John 5:25, 28, 29 "Most truly I say to you, the hour is coming, and it is now, when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who have paid attention will live. 28 Do not be amazed at this, for the hour is coming in which all those in the memorial tombs will hear his voice 29 and come out, those who did good things to a resurrection of life....." Both Daniel 12:1, 2 and 1Thessalonians 4:16 make it very clear that the person of primary importance at the resurrection is the Archangel and the ONLY voice heard at the resurrection is the voice of the Archangel Michael. No other voice is mentioned at this extremely important event. John 5 states that this voice belongs to the Son of God....PERIOD!!!
@BeroeanPickets5 жыл бұрын
Sound reasoning, Donald V, if verse 2 were speaking of the resurrection that Jesus refers to at John 5:28, 29. However, it does not and even the organization agrees with that. *** dp chap. 17 p. 291 pars. 9-10 Identifying True Worshipers in the Time of the End *** In the Bible, resurrection sometimes has a spiritual significance. For example, both Ezekiel and Revelation contain prophetic passages that apply to a spiritual revival, or resurrection.-Ezekiel 37:1-14; Revelation 11:3, 7, 11. 10 Has there been such a spiritual revival of God’s anointed servants in the time of the end? Yes! It is a historical reality that in 1918 a small remnant of faithful Christians were subjected to an extraordinary attack that disrupted their organized public ministry. Then, against all likelihood, in 1919 they returned to life in a spiritual sense. However, the issue is one of timing. When did this spiritual resurrection occur? My next video will deal with that question.
@donald23065 жыл бұрын
@@BeroeanPickets No, as I explained in my previous comment, the organization does not agree with that. Your false reasoning and deception becomes apparent. Of course, it comes as no surprise that you would now want to attempt to twist and confuse folks with the spiritual resurrection versus the physical resurrection.....especially since you have just been scripturally shown and proven that Jesus is the Archangel spoken of at 1Thess.4:16. Time to change the subject, right? Well....smooth, but not without flaw!
@tootychristo12815 жыл бұрын
Donald: Eric is not deceiving anyone in this matter: Actually the most compelling evidence for me as a witness that Jesus is not Michael, comes from looking at the very context of scriptures that mention him: look at Revelations 12:1-6; and verse 7-12 you'll see a child who is to shepherd the nations with an iron rod.....in verse 6.....how can that child become Michael in verse 7? Or look at the book of Jude and you will that Jude is aware of both the Lord Jesus and Michael who has dispute with with the Devil: did he say that these two are the same?
@donald23065 жыл бұрын
@@tootychristo1281 Again, I will reiterate....WHO'S voice does John say the dead will hear and then come out of the graves? I clearly see that it is the voice of the Son of God....PERIOD!!! Now...what sort of voice does 1Thess.4:16 say that the Lord himself (the Son of God) will descend with? I clearly see that it reads that the Lord himself will descend WITH THE VOICE OF AN ARCHANGEL.....PERIOD!!! What is the next event that occurs immediately after the Lord descends with that voice? THE DEAD WILL ARISE!!!.....PERIOD!!! Let's not allow ourselves to be confused any further with 1st grade illogical thinking. A voice is not made of solid matter. It can not be carried around in one's arms or hands. It can only be carried in the same manner as one would carry their own personality. When it says that the Lord will descend with an Archangel's voice, it is speaking of the Lord's very own voice and it is describing the quality and authority of that voice as being the voice of an Archangel....just as the voice of a king would be the voice of a king both in quality and authority. You should also take note, that not only is the voice the dead hear at the resurrection said to be the voice of the Son of God at John 5, but that ONLY the voice of the Archangel is heard at both instances in scripture where the actual resurrection is related...Dan.12;1,2 and 1Thess.4:16. With this being said and pointed out to you, this issue is an albatross around your neck regardless of how obstinate or unreasonable you insist on being with what the scriptures actually show and state. All that remains for you here is to continue to "twist and shout" as the Beatles used to say.
@donald23065 жыл бұрын
No further replies will be forthcoming or are necessary from me.
@tinah90595 жыл бұрын
Waiting veeeeery patiently for your videos about the trinity doctrine...hint hint 😝. I really can't wait.
@BeroeanPickets5 жыл бұрын
Working on them. But it's such an important topic that I want to cover all the bases.
@tinah90595 жыл бұрын
@@BeroeanPickets thank you for all the time you put in. It is so appreciated
@gataheart5 жыл бұрын
"better than angels" ..honor, glory, power, kingdom, immortality, a 'family' of his own (mankind), to whom all in heaven and earth owe their name ..a few reasons he is "better". None of this was true in it's present sense prior to his faithful death.
@martyjohn0075 жыл бұрын
Hey Eric how do we sin against the holy spirit what is your understanding I am confused...Jesus said all other sins will be forgiven but blasphemy against the holy spirit is unforgivable??
@BeroeanPickets5 жыл бұрын
The holy spirit is God's gift to the faithful. We choose Jesus and show our faith by baptism, and after that the holy spirit comes upon us and guides us into the truth. (John 16:13) So how can we sin against it? We can do that by resisting it, by fighting against it. Look at it this way. I may blaspheme God, but that sin is forgivable. However, I must first repent to be forgiven. If I don't repent, I will not be forgiven. It is the spirit that gives me the power to repent. The father comes to me and extends his hand, but I must grasp it. If I slap it away, what forgiveness remains for me. His hand is the holy spirit. I must accept it to be forgiven, but if I refuse it, if I work against it, I cannot expect to be forgiven.
@tootychristo12815 жыл бұрын
The best is to read the context of that statement and realize he was talking to the parishes who were deliberately denying the work and power of holy spirit and attributing these to Satan! Yet they had had ample evidence about the work, ministry and powerful works of Jesus Christ! They were blaspheming the holy spirit!
Hi, I listened to your message and have a question about your reference to Jesus Christ as “ultimately our brother”. I don’t find any reference to him as our brother in the Bible. As the only begotten of YHWH, he has a position above all others. I feel something is missing here in the understanding of Christ’s importance. I am of a sincere heart and need clarification. Could you please explain brotherhood with Christ? Thank you and I appreciate your work.
@BeroeanPickets5 жыл бұрын
“. . .For whoever does the will of my Father who is in heaven, that one is my brother and sister and mother.”” (Mt 12:50) “. . .In reply the King will say to them, ‘Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did it to one of the least of these my brothers, you did it to me.’” (Mt 25:40) I would recommend you do a search on the word brother and brothers throughout the Christian Scriptures to get a better picture of the relationship we have with our Lord.
@tootychristo12815 жыл бұрын
Zack pro: while you ask Eric about Jesus brothers, may be you can also help me answer these questions for me: 1. Hebrews 1:9 indicates that Jesus was anointed over his "companions" or "fellows". Who are these fellows and when was he anointed over them? Would it be reasonable to believe that Jesus was of same nature as his "fellows" before his anointing? 2. What is the difference between "devine nature"(Deity) and angelic nature?
@cakeworld73365 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for responding to my question, I was a Jehovah’s witness for 20 years. Though I have not been to the meetings since 2003, I only recently dared to watch any opposing view. I must admit that at times I feel as though I’m stumbling around in the dark. But you and others have been a blessing for me as I study the Bible on my own. I’m learning about the deity of Christ, and now to realize that he is also not ashamed to call us brother is so humbling it brings me to tears. Thank you again, and may God continue to bless you in all your endeavors.
@cakeworld73365 жыл бұрын
Tooty Christo1 This verse continues a quotation Psalm 45:6,7,8. Hebrew1:7 gave a contrasting reference to angels as servants, with shifting characteristics. The Old Testament reference is meant to prove that Jesus Christ is clearly not an angel or some other created being.
@tootychristo12815 жыл бұрын
Zack pro: you aren't answering all the questions: 1. When was Jesus anointed over his fellows? 2. What the real/material difference between "divine nature"(Deity) and angelic nature? 3. Let me add this: if Jesus was never created; is not committing idolatry by referring to his father as his father as "his God"(Revelation 3:12; John 20:17; Hebrews 1:9; etc...)?
@mauriceatwell59395 жыл бұрын
I would love to add to your very good research. Under the definition of archangel, can it be said that Satan is a archangel because Revelation says Satan and his angels? The JW believes Jesus return to his office of Micheal when he back to heaven. However the scriptures always refer Jesus as himself as depicted in heaven. Johannes Greber is where they got that idea of Michael. The JWs doesn't have confirmation bias. They simply follow the teaching of the GB without question. No matter if it doesn't make sense from a human standpoint. The resurrected is never described as angels.
@clagle98995 жыл бұрын
They really are confused about this and try to avoid this subject when you question them about it.
@clagle98995 жыл бұрын
Hebrews 1:5 clearly states that God never sent an angel to die on the cross, and not begotten of the Father. They state "but he is superior angel" well a queen bee is still a bee, and Michael is an angel period. He has his role, and Jesus has his.
@johnfreeman84455 жыл бұрын
would God send an angel to die for mankind as a,ransom? surely jehovah is greater than that..if we are ransomed by an angel the whole issue of grace falls apart..does not the scripture say God purchased us by his own blood ( or as NWT says blood of his own (son) ..
@grizz63705 жыл бұрын
John that is why they have removed the word "grace" from the bible and replaced with "undeserved kindness" in the " newworld Transformation"
@johnfreeman84455 жыл бұрын
@@grizz6370 i always thought that undeserved kindness was the same .but in fact the word grace in the OT had the thought of showing favour. the angels at christs birth said " peace and goodwill to men" not peace to men of goodwill as NWT says..favour or goodwill from jehovah .the word grace i now prefer as it says to us that God is extending to us more than just kindness .he showes us favour without thought of recieving a repayment from us exept faith in his son and his sacrifice for us..thats my unddrstanding ..
@shawngregory13125 жыл бұрын
John freeman yes yhwh could send an angel to fulfill this. He could anoint a literal fruitcake to do this It’s His choice DID. he ? Different discussion But yes. An angel. Could be used as mans redeemer. No reason not
@eew80605 жыл бұрын
Shawn Gregory Thank You!! It seems people, in an effort to defend personally favored doctrine, forget about the Sovereignty of God to do as he pleases.
@mitchmiller23825 жыл бұрын
I disagree. If God didn't send Christ but an angel, for one thing, it would sow that YHWH didn't offer to sacrifice part of Himself, which would mean that Abraham offered up a better sacrifice than Yahweh. Paul also says that "Since by man (Adam) came death, by man also came the resurrection of the dead. An angel could never fit the bill in the first place.
@kmm291 Жыл бұрын
All of your videos have been studied researched and contemplated to say what the real truth is. Excellent.
@Sallytwizzle Жыл бұрын
Hi Eric, I absolutely love your delivery in unpacking the truth about JWs. As a witness I always struggled with the teaching that Jesus is Michael the Archangel. The watchtower teaches that angels are not immortal and they are not infallible. But if Jesus was Michael, there may have been a chance that he could sin, like the angel that became satan. I have searched high and low in the scriptures and have yet to find one that reveals that the only exception regarding an angel who is immortal, is Michael, because he is supposed to be Jesus. This makes no sense to me at all.The witnesses also teach that because the name Michael means "who is like God?", this could only refer to Jesus, because he is made in Jehovah’s image. However the angel Gabriel's name means " God is my strength", this could also apply to Jesus in the same manner, if he were indeed an angel. I have started attending Beroean Pickets bible study meetings which I thoroughly enjoy, and I will be getting re-baptised next week. Thank you for all of your hard work and for the excellent and eloquent delivery of explaining scriptures and for helping all of us find our Lord and Master, Jesus.😊
@jdog4life9115 жыл бұрын
Jude 1:9 Michael Lacks Authority over Satan Mathew 4:10 Jesus Holds Authority over Satan
@estonemwanje53534 жыл бұрын
ARCHANGEL have more authority over Satan, not only to rebuke but even to fight and thrown him away. REV.12:7,8. Again, according to GALATIANS 4:14 Jesus is an angle, but for me he is a special angle, his VOICE is being used by Jesus in 1THESSALONIANS 4:15,6. For sure, Jesus is archangel Michael
@conquerantmutombo99573 жыл бұрын
@@estonemwanje5353 yes...for u...not the bible...plus the bible says not to lean on ur own understanding... 🤌🏾
@estonemwanje53533 жыл бұрын
@@conquerantmutombo9957 what about for scriptures I mentioned? You would use scriptures as I did.
@conquerantmutombo99573 жыл бұрын
@@estonemwanje5353 let me ask u something is Michel one of a kind...unique like begotten like Jesus?
@earthmeasuredrifugiatidipe14065 жыл бұрын
So precious informations. Thanks im very grateful
@godvsevolution28165 жыл бұрын
Please explain Luke 2:21 “And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the child, his name was called JESUS, which was so named of the angel before he was conceived in the womb.”
@tiffanygonzalez-no-excuses19672 жыл бұрын
The angel, I think Gabriel, came to Mary and said she would conceive a son and told her to name him Jesus.
@darthfader78765 жыл бұрын
With JW logic, perhaps Jesus might be a trumpet?
@izybunny19993 жыл бұрын
No, Jesus is not Michael nor the Trumpet. He is the firstborn Son of God, he's been already with God before the Angels were created.
@IAM-kg5pq5 жыл бұрын
So you are saying that those who sit on thrones and wear golden crowns picture archangels/chief angels? I would suggest that what you have done by saying this is completely eisegesis. 24 like 144 is a multiple of 12. 12 relates to the foundation of God's arrangement on earth ie 12 tribes, 12 apostles. The multiples of 12 in revelation have to do with the same thing, these numbers represent God's arrangement in connection with mankind ie 24 - represents the heavenly kingdom, 144 - represents kingdom heirs whilst still on earth.
@jennsinclair2505 жыл бұрын
Excellent! Here’s some points from my letter I wrote to my JW family “The comparison is being made between Jesus & Angels. Jesus was different. Unique. All of the rest of the Angels existed for the same purpose. Verse 14 basically sums it up for me. ALL the angels are used to convey messages for God. But the key word is ALL. Notice in verse 8 it says about the son that "God IS your throne forever and ever" Paul is making the distinction that God NEVER said to any of the angels, things he said to the Son. If that is the case i have to ask" what do the scriptures say about who Jesus is?" Did Jesus say he was an Angel before coming to Earth? Matt 1: 20-23 But after he had thought these things over, look! Jehovah’s angel appeared to him in a dream, saying: “Joseph, son of David, do not be afraid to take your wife Mary home, for what has been conceived in her is by holy spirit. She will give birth to a son, and you are to name him Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins.” All of this actually came about to fulfill what was spoken by Jehovah through his prophet, saying: “Look! The virgin will become pregnant and will give birth to a son, and they will name him Im·manʹu·el,” which means, when translated, “With Us Is God." John 20:26-28 Well, eight days later his disciples were again indoors, and Thomas was with them. Jesus came, although the doors were locked, and he stood in their midst and said: “May you have peace.”Next he said to Thomas: “Put your finger here, and see my hands, and take your hand and stick it into my side, and stop doubting but believe.” In answer Thomas said to him: “My Lord and my God!” Acts 16:27-34 When the jailer woke up and saw that the prison doors were open, he drew his sword and was about to kill himself, assuming that the prisoners had escaped. But Paul called out with a loud voice: “Do not hurt yourself, for we are all here!” So he asked for lights and rushed in, and seized with trembling, he fell down before Paul and Silas. He brought them outside and said: “Sirs, what must I do to get saved?” They said: “Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will get saved, you and your household.” Then they spoke the word of Jehovah (in the Kingdom Interlinear and King James it reads " word of God" and "Word of the Lord" respectively) to him together with all those in his house. And he took them along in that hour of the night and washed their wounds. Then he and his entire household were baptized without delay. He brought them into his house and set a table before them, and he rejoiced greatly with all his household now that he had believed in God. (Paul & Silas did not say to the Jailer " Believe in Jehovah, and you will get saved, you and your household, again this is an example of how The Translators of the New World Translation have added the Name Jehovah and it changes the context) Mal 3:1 Look! I am sending my messenger, and he will clear up a way before me. And suddenly the true Lord, whom you are seeking, will come to his temple; and the messenger of the covenant will come, in whom you take delight. Look! He will certainly come,” says Jehovah of armies. Luke 1:76 (Zechariah, John the Baptist's father speaking here) "But as for you, young child, you will be called a prophet of the Most High, for you will go ahead of Jehovah ("Lord" in the King James & Kingdom Interlinear) to prepare his ways. ( again this is an example of how inserting the name Jehovah changes the context. John was going to be going ahead & preparing the way for Son of God, the man Jesus since Jehovah wasn't the one coming to earth, since no man can see God in his Spirit form and live) John 1:6-8 There came a man who was sent as a representative of God; his name was John. This man came as a witness, in order to bear witness about the light, so that people of all sorts might believe through him. He was not that light, but he was meant to bear witness about that light" I had to read those verses very carefully. In Malachi, Jehovah said he's sending his messenger ahead of Himself. That He, the true Lord would come into his temple. In John, John wrote that John the Baptist was sent a representative of God ( Notice the Capital "G"). I ask " Who came into the Temple?" The bible answers that Jesus did. I also found these in my research of the Scriptures: A) Psalms 65:7 "You calm the raging seas, The crash of their waves and the turmoil of the nations" -Hebrew Scripture: About Jehovah Psalms 89:9 "You rule over the raging of the sea; When its waves surge, you calm them" -Hebrew Scripture: About Jehovah Mark 4:39 "With that he got up and rebuked the wind and said to the sea: “Hush! Be quiet!" -Greek Scripture: About Jesus B) Isaiah 43:11 "I-I am Jehovah, and besides me there is no saviour." -Hebrew Scripture: About Jehovah 2 Tim 1:10 "but now it has been made clearly evident through the manifestation of our Savior, Christ Jesus, who has abolished death and has shed light on life and incorruption through the good news" -Greek Scripture: About Jesus C) "Nehemiah 1:8-9 Remember, please, the word that you commanded your servant Moses: ‘If you act unfaithfully, I will scatter you among the peoples. But if you return to me and observe my commandments and obey them, though your dispersed people should be at the end of the heavens, I will gather them from there and bring them to the place that I have chosen to have my name reside" -Hebrew Scripture: About Jehovah Matt 23:37 "Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the killer of the prophets and stoner of those sent to her-how often I wanted to gather your children together the way a hen gathers her chicks under her wings! But you did not want it. Look! Your house is abandoned to you" -Greek Scripture: About Jesus D) Ecc 12:7 "Then the dust returns to the earth, just as it was, and the spirit returns to the true God who gave it" -Hebrew Scripture: About Jehovah Acts 7:59 "As they were stoning Stephen, he made this appeal: “Lord Jesus, receive my spirit" -Greek Scripture: About Jesus E) Job 14:15 "You will call, and I will answer you. You will long for the work of your hands." -Hebrew Scripture-About Jehovah John 5:25 "Most truly I say to you, the hour is coming, and it is now, when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who have paid attention will live" -Greek Scripture: About Jesus F) Isaiah 40:29 "He gives power to the tired one And full might to those lacking strength" -Hebrew Scripture: About Jehovah Matt 11:28-29 "Come to me, all you who are toiling and loaded down, and I will refresh you. Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am mild-tempered and lowly in heart, and you will find refreshment for yourselves" -Greek Scripture: About Jesus G) Isaiah 43:10 “You are my witnesses,” declares Jehovah, “Yes, my servant whom I have chosen, So that you may know and have faith in me And understand that I am the same One. Before me no God was formed, And after me there has been none"-Hebrew Scripture: About Jehovah Acts 1:8 "But you will receive power when the holy spirit comes upon you, and you will be witnesses of me in Jerusalem, in all Ju·deʹa and Sa·marʹi·a, and to the most distant part of the earth"-Greek Scripture: About Jesus H) Psalms 136:3 "Give thanks to the Lord of lords, For his loyal love endures forever"-Hebrew Scripture: About Jehovah Rev 17:14 "These will battle with the Lamb, but because he is Lord of lords and King of kings, the Lamb will conquer them. Also, those with him who are called and chosen and faithful will do so" -Greek Scripture: About Jesus I) Exodus 15:18 "Jehovah will rule as king forever and ever" -Hebrew Scripture: About Jehovah Luke 1:33 "and he will rule as King over the house of Jacob forever, and there will be no end to his Kingdom." -Greek Scripture- About Jesus J) Isaiah 43:25 "I, I am the One who is blotting out your transgressions for my own sake, And I will not remember your sins" Hebrew scripture-About Jehovah Mark 2:5-7 "When Jesus saw their faith, he said to the paralytic: “Child, your sins are forgiven.” Now some of the scribes were there, sitting and reasoning in their hearts: “Why is this man talking this way? He is blaspheming. Who can forgive sins except one, God?" Greek Scripture- About Jesus K) Isaiah 55:7 "Let the wicked man leave his way And the evil man his thoughts; Let him return to Jehovah, who will have mercy on him, To our God, for he will forgive in a large way"-Hebrew Scripture: About Jehovah Matt 9:6 "However, in order for you to know that the Son of man has authority on earth to forgive sins-” then he said to the paralytic: “Get up, pick up your stretcher, and go to your home."- Greek Scripture: About Jesus L) Isaiah 1:2-3 Hear, O heavens, and pay attention, O earth, For Jehovah has spoken: “Sons I have brought up and raised, But they have revolted against me. A bull well knows its buyer, And a donkey the manger of its owner; But Israel does not know me, My own people do not behave with understanding. Hebrew Scripture: About Jehovah Jude 4 My reason is that certain men have slipped in among you who were long ago appointed to this judgment by the Scriptures; they are ungodly men who turn the undeserved kindness of our God into an excuse for brazen conduct and who prove false to our only owner and Lord, Jesus Christ. Greek Scripture: About Jesus M) Hosea 2: 16 And in that day,’ declares Jehovah, ‘You will call me My husband, and you will no longer call me My master. Hebrew Scripture: About Jehovah 2 Cor 11:2 For I am jealous over you with a godly jealousy, for I personally promised you in marriage to one husband that I might present you as a chaste virgin to the Christ. Greek Scripture: About Jesus
@jennsinclair2505 жыл бұрын
N) Isaiah 54:5 For your Grand Maker is as your husband, Jehovah of armies is his name, And the Holy One of Israel is your Repurchaser. Hebrew Scripture: About Jehovah Galatians 3:13 Christ purchased us, releasing us from the curse of the Law by becoming a curse instead of us, because it is written: “Accursed is every man hung upon a stake. Greek Scripture: About Jesus O) Jeremiah 3:14 Return, you renegade sons,” declares Jehovah. “For I have become your true master; and I will take you, one from a city and two from a family, and I will bring you to Zion. Hebrew Scripture: About Jehovah Colossians 3:24 for you know that it is from Jehovah(again in the kingdom interlinear and King James Bible it reads " Lord" no capitals: adding "Jehovah" changes the context of the verse since Paul starts the chapter talking about how to remain clean in unity service to Christ) you will receive the inheritance as a reward. Slave for the Master, Christ. Greek Scripture: About Jesus P) Isaiah 44:6 This is what Jehovah says, The King of Israel and his Repurchaser, Jehovah of armies: ‘I am the first and I am the last.There is no God but me. Hebrew Scripture: About Jehovah Rev 22:12-16 “‘Look! I am coming quickly, and the reward I give is with me, to repay each one according to his work. I am the Alʹpha and the O·meʹga, the first and the last, the beginning and the end. Happy are those who wash their robes, so that they may have authority to go to the trees of life and that they may gain entrance into the city through its gates.Outside are the dogs and those who practice spiritism and those who are sexually immoral and the murderers and the idolaters and everyone who loves and practices lying. I, Jesus, sent my angel to bear witness to you about these things for the congregations. I am the root and the offspring of David and the bright morning star. Greek Scripture: About Jesus I typed the word Angel in the JW APP. Every instance where Man is interacting with an Angel, the bible identifies them as Angels. There isn't one Scripture that refers to Jesus as being an Angel. I looked up Scriptures that refer to Michael the Archangel. One of them stood out to me as very significant. Dan 10:13 But the prince of the royal realm of Persia was standing in opposition to me for twenty-one days, and, look! Miʹcha·el, one of the foremost princes, came to help me; and I, for my part, remained there beside the kings of Persia." I noticed that the wording used indicates that there are more than one "foremost princes" . It is plural. While its possible that there are multiple archangels, its best not to presume theres only one. Jude 9 But when Miʹcha·el the archangel had a difference with the Devil and was disputing about Moses’ body, he did not dare to bring a judgment against him in abusive terms, but said: “May Jehovah ( "Lord' in the Kingdom Linear and King James Bible. In Jude verse 4 it says " My reason is that certain men have slipped in who have long ago been appointed by the Scriptures to this judgment, ungodly men, turning the undeserved kindness of our God into an excuse for loose conduct and proving false to our only Owner and Lord, Jesus Christ." Once again the context is changed when the Name Jehovah is added) rebuke you." Daniel 12:1 “And during that time Miʹcha·el will stand up,the great prince who is standing in behalf of the sons of your people. And there will certainly occur a time of distress such as has not been made to occur since there came to be a nation until that time.And during that time your people will escape, every one who is found written down in the book" w15 5/15 p. 29 QUESTIONS FROM READERS Who is Gog of Magog mentioned in the book of Ezekiel? What occurs next as a result of this final attack? Daniel tells us: “During that time Michael [Jesus Christ] will stand up [at Armageddon], the great prince who is standing [since 1914] in behalf of your people. And there will occur a time of distress [the great tribulation] such as has not occurred since there came to be a nation until that time. And during that time your people will escape, everyone who is found written down in the book.” (Dan. 12:1) This action on the part of God’s representative Jesus is also described at Revelation 19:11-21. My first thought is why are the words " Jesus Christ" , "at Armageddon" , and "since 1914" inserted into that scripture? The next is that I am taught that Jesus became King of God's Kingdom in 1914 so even if those words weren't inserted Jesus couldn't be the prince. He is King of God's Kingdom and according to what I'm taught at the meetings he has been King since 1914. He doesn't become the king at Armageddon" it-2 pp. 393-394 MICHAEL There are also other correspondences establishing that Michael is actually the Son of God. Daniel, after making the first reference to Michael (Da 10:13), recorded a prophecy reaching down to “the time of the end” (Da 11:40) and then stated: “And during that time Michael will stand up, the great prince who is standing in behalf of the sons of [Daniel’s] people.” (Da 12:1) Michael’s ‘standing up’ was to be associated with “a time of distress such as has not been made to occur since there came to be a nation until that time.” (Da 12:1) In Daniel’s prophecy, ‘standing up’ frequently refers to the action of a king, either taking up his royal power or acting effectively in his capacity as king. (Da 11:2-4, 7, 16b, 20, 21) This supports the conclusion that Michael is Jesus Christ, since Jesus is Jehovah’s appointed King, commissioned to destroy all the nations at Har-Magedon.-Re 11:15; 16:14-16. If its "taking up his royal power" as quoted in the above it-2 quote than Jesus didn't become King in 1914. He would still just be a "foremost prince". He would become King at Armageddon. w00 5/15 pp. 15-19 "Have Faith in God’s Prophetic Word!" Paragraph 8 In the first year of Babylonian King Belshazzar, Jehovah granted his prophet Daniel a dream and remarkable visions. The prophet first saw four huge beasts. God’s angel identified them as “four kings,” thus indicating that they symbolized successive world powers. (Daniel 7:1-8, 17) Daniel next beheld Jehovah, “the Ancient of Days,” sitting gloriously enthroned. Judging the beasts adversely, he took rulership away from them and destroyed the fourth beast. Lasting rulership over “the peoples, national groups and languages” was then vested in “someone like a son of man.” (Daniel 7:9-14) What a wonderful prophecy relating to the enthronement of “the Son of man,” Jesus Christ, in the heavens in the year 1914! If its "acting effectively in his capacity as king" as quoted in the above quote from it-2, Than Jesus isn't the Prince since he would have to be a King already in order to act as a King. Do you see how my mind is troubled? Lastly, Jesus never once said he was angel. Neither did the Demons. Even they identified Jesus as the Son of God: Matt 8:29 "And, look! they screamed, saying: “What have we to do with you, Son of God? Did you come here to torment us before the appointed time? I noticed they didn't scream "And, look! they screamed, saying: “What have we to do with you, Michael? Did you come here to torment us before the appointed time of 1914". They were acknowledging that Jesus had authority to Judge them already. Matt 28:18 " And Jesus approached and spoke to them, saying: “All authority has been given me in heaven and on the earth." His authority was already in his possession. He was not waiting until 1914 to receive it. It extended in heaven and earth. All authority.
@clagle98995 жыл бұрын
Your evidence is clear, but they will not see it.
@jennsinclair2505 жыл бұрын
Cla Gle exactly. I got ZERO responses. Here is the full letter www.bcbpa.com/anonymous-canada
@tootychristo12815 жыл бұрын
Jenn what about Hebrews 1:9? : 1. Hebrews 1: 9 indicates that Jesus was anointed over his "companions" or "fellows". Who are these fellows and when was he anointed over them? Would it be reasonable to believe that Jesus was of same nature as his companions before his anointing?
@ericbulman1752 Жыл бұрын
Isaiah 43:11 I even I am the LORD ,And besides Me there is no savior . However in the new testament Christ is called our Savior and the only Savior .
@freeridew9005 жыл бұрын
God’s name is I am !!!!!!!! and Jesus claimed it !!!!!!!!
@clagle98995 жыл бұрын
Jesus never claimed to be the God of the old testament. What God actually says I exist because I exist, or I am the self existing one.
@baruq47865 жыл бұрын
So, every time I use the expression I am, I claim to be God?
@freeridew9005 жыл бұрын
Baruq In that passage the context is that he claimed he is God! Pharisees wanted to kill him after that
@freeridew9005 жыл бұрын
Baruq Jesus, in response to the Pharisees’ question “Who do you think you are?” said, “‘Your father Abraham rejoiced at the thought of seeing my day; he saw it and was glad.’ ‘You are not yet fifty years old,’ the Jews said to him, ‘and you have seen Abraham!’ ‘I tell you the truth,’ Jesus answered, ‘before Abraham was born, I am!’ At this, they picked up stones to stone him, but Jesus hid himself, slipping away from the temple grounds” (John 8:56-59). The violent response of the Jews to Jesus’ “I AM” statement indicates they clearly understood what He was declaring-that He was the eternal God incarnate. Jesus was equating Himself with the "I AM" title God gave Himself in Exodus 3:14.
@tootychristo12815 жыл бұрын
Free...The pharisees wound have reacted violently even if they thought he was claiming to be older than Abraham! In fact; the issue here is Jesus age; not who he is (that had already ended in verses 53-55). Because he claimed to have seen Abraham seeing his day and rejoicing; they say you are not even 50 years old and yet you have seen Abraham? He say yes because i existed before him( not I AM)
@joha7905 жыл бұрын
Daniel 10:13 does it for me - Michael is one of the chief princes not the Lord of glory! Thanks for the clip
@brucebarnard8 ай бұрын
There is a KZbin channel, NWT Defended, which has a good video which clearly shows why the Son of God who became Jesus Christ is Michael the archangel. Its entitled The Case for Jesus being Michael the Archangel(NWT). Check it out.
@darthfader78765 жыл бұрын
As a kid i had a problem with his name changing so drastically from Micheal to Jesus!
@abeycee7427 Жыл бұрын
You shall call his name Emmanuel
@peteryoung4974 Жыл бұрын
Hi I’ve got a question that’s been bugging me. Who is this angel of the lord in the Old Testament . In Zechariah 3:2.. he says”the lord rebuke you to Satan”. If this is Christ why didn’t he say I rebuke you . This is similar to what micheal said. Who is the high commander that Joshawa meets. Thanks for the great videos.
@LosBereanos Жыл бұрын
Hi Peter, Frankly, we cannot know who the Angel of the Lord is in Zechariah 3:2. The Bible doesn't say. All we know is that angel in Hebrew means messenger, so the "messenger of the Lord" is the one who is spoke of by Zechariah.
@omarseneriz55775 жыл бұрын
Fantastic videos, thank you for sharing. I am still going true the others and wondering if you have anything in regards of 607 leading to 1914? People need to be educated about it for sure.
@arlittleredfox76715 жыл бұрын
Numerically 607 comes before 1914. Sorry. Had to do a funny. I think he would cover that info ideally because he seems to be well versed and his research is complete.
@omarseneriz55775 жыл бұрын
AR little red fox He is really good. I am enjoying all his work and appreciate all the research he has done. I recently woke up and been out a few months. I had no idea what I was supporting all this years till I found all the information and claims against that organization.
@brucebarnard8 ай бұрын
There is a KZbin channel, NWT Defended, which has a good video which clearly shows why the Son of God who became Jesus Christ is Michael the archangel. Its entitled The Case for Jesus being Michael the Archangel(NWT). Check it out.
@mariamillwood68745 жыл бұрын
Do Jehovahs Witnesses believe that Jesus is Michael the Archangel in name only? I read an article on “Angels” in one of their publications, I think it was in a Watchtower. It specifically said: “ Michael is another name for Jesus.” I think the Article was titled, “Angels, who are they?”
@LosBereanos5 жыл бұрын
Jehovah's Witnesses believe Jesus is an angel. The first one every created and the one through whom all other angels were created, but an angel nonetheless.
@j.g.m.61805 жыл бұрын
Is Jehovah the son of the father in OT and also in NT but as the fleshyJesus , because in Genesis it says Jehovah formed man from the dust.In colossians 1:16 I think it is all things where created for and through Jesus.Jesus also stated about the father.The Father is greater then the son and that no man has seen his form or heard his voice.In OT you see Jehovah talking and appearing to people.I still can't wrap my mind around this trinity thing.
@grizz63705 жыл бұрын
All things were created by and through "JESUS". Also there was no Jehovah b4 Catholic monk Ramundus Martini invented him in 1270ad
@grizz63705 жыл бұрын
Where does God appear to mortals in the OT?
@grizz63705 жыл бұрын
God, Jesus, an Holy Spirit are 3 persons in nature but One in divinity. Father, Son, and Holy Ghost.
@tarantulaclan50255 жыл бұрын
No they are not 3 persons!! Where does it say that in the bible
@j.g.m.61805 жыл бұрын
@@grizz6370 Read Genesis 18
@archieliburd43275 жыл бұрын
Any sensible person who read Daniel 12 V1 and 2 and compare it to John 5 v 28 and 29 must conclude that both accounts are speaking of the same event and the same person MICHAEL IS JESUS. How else would Michael get the book,(scrolls) if he is not Jesus? Reverlations 5 v 1 to 5 says that Jesus is the only one Worthy to open the book (scrolls) or even look on them .
@tootychristo12815 жыл бұрын
Actually the most compelling evidence that Jesus is not Michael, comes from looking at the very context of scriptures that mention him: look at Revelations 12:1-6; and verse 7-12 you'll see a child who is to shepherd the nations with an iron rod.....in verse 6.....how can that child become Michael in verse 7?
@annamarina30875 жыл бұрын
Hi Eric - Note the order of St George and St Michael. Arch Angel Michael and Dragon, St George and Dragon - blend the two together and the Arch Angel Michael kind of becomes the patron saint of England. Look at Stonehenge - was it really a temple dedicated to Apollo? If so consider the account of Apollo and the Python and see how easy it would be to turn the patron saint of England into the sun god - Apollo. By this, a logic can be made-up saying Jesus, who is really Apollo is the patron saint of England. Hmm. I'm not convinced, are you? :) Now Apollo is a Greek idol/sun god. But the Egyptians also worshipped the sun. I believe they called it the Aten disk. Now, we are back on the subject of Egypt which C T Russell and Piazzi-Smyth (British Israelite) were so interested in. Further, I understand that Sigmund Freud's father (who was a rabbi) taught that Moses came to worship Jehovah because of the Hittites. But Joseph had really been a monotheist, in so far as he was a sun worshipper. Rubbish but clever rubbish. Sigmund Freud's himself used Egyptian idols for his analysis of the human mind. His nephew took his uncle's beliefs and established what we call public relations. Also, a man called Sir Flinders Petrie understood that the idol Horus (associated with the sun), in Egyptian mythology was portrayed as a saviour and identified by a symbol called the Chi-Rho (XP). He knew that some used XP as short-hand for the real saviour Jesus Christ because XP translated from Greek is CHR, short for Christ. Flinders looked into this and considered there was a link between the mythical Horus and Jesus. He noted that on the coinage of the first Pope, Emperor Constantine (who white-washed himself with Christianity for political purposes to save the Roman Empire) there was something called the Laburnum, aka Chi-Rho. The Chi-Rho had a Gnostic serpent underneath it, implying that Constantine was either a Gnostic, or inclined to Gnosticism. If indeed Constantine was a Gnostic, it would mean he considered himself to be enlightened by some sort of so-called 'knowledge' derived from sources other than the Bible. Given XP was also a symbol of Horus, Constantine might have believed that salvation was by Horus. An identical symbol to XP has been found inscribed on rocks dating from 2,500 BC Sumerian, and was interpreted as ‘a combination of the two Sun-symbols’ - symbols of the ancient shining ones, perhaps the original demons, the Nephilim. You may find this interesting too - Pyramid built by Noah C T Russell's belief in the sign of the pyramid most likely came from the Second Adventists. In 1859, John Taylor published The Great Pyramid: Why Was It Built? And Who Built It? He put forward the idea that the architect and supervisor of the Great Pyramid was not an Egyptian but Noah. Other pyramidologists believed it was Melchizedek. Piazzi-Smyth, an astronomer, accepted this idea. In June 1876, he published an article in the Bible Examiner, a journal owned by George Storrs in Brooklyn. George Storrs went on to run a series of articles on the Pyramid and its prophetic significance in the Herald of Life and the Coming Kingdom. In 1877, Joseph Seiss published a book on the pyramid entitled Miracle in Stone. Russell attributed his knowledge on pyramids to Piazzi-Smyth (British Israelite). Oh, by the way my membership of the club down the road came to an end on the Bank Holiday May 27th. I haven't worked out yet who they are. Whoever they are they definitely aren't Jehovah's Witness in the sense that the prophet Daniel was. You know, a faithful descendant of Jacob. The really objected to me holding fast to Daniel's words and suggested they were of a channel that is no longer being used today. Eventually I said to one of them, "Jehovah rebuke you."
@BeroeanPickets5 жыл бұрын
Thanks Anna, that was instructive. I didn't know that about George Storrs.
@annamarina30875 жыл бұрын
@@BeroeanPickets Pleasure :)
@narossenarosse27345 жыл бұрын
In years, I hv been questioning who Jesus is. Why so many religions teaching about Jesus differently? Which one is the truth? Islam, Catholic, Protestant, Mormon, or JW's? Why Jesus is always be a topic. Well, it is because Jesus is the way of the truth (John 14:6) and Satan wants to blur it. Altough, I am still in JW organization (I guess), I hv a doubt about their teaching that Jesus is Michael (an angel, GOD's creation). So, I stop to be an announcer or join any congregation. I want to free my mindset. Now, a little bit I can receive a concept about who is GOD and Jesus. It is like this. There is a man who lives in a small town A. He is so intelligent, kindness, he has so many brilliant ideas, hard worker, has best advices, he likes to help people, etc. His neighbors really love and trust him. Because the way he talks and doing his works prove that he his a wise person. He is so famous among his neighborhood. However, he wants to help more people. What is he going to do? He makes books, videos or records his voices to spread his knowledge, experiences, lessons, ideas, advices, etc to town and other cities. People who does not know that man (never met him face to face) will know who he is through his books or cassettes. They will agree, indeed, he is an intelligent and a wiseman. If the man just send his assitant, of course not all knowledges can be shared totally. Always there is something missing about the teaching. Contain of their mind is different. Because the assistant is not the man. The assitant does not know the deepest thought of that man. I imagine Jesus is like the book and the cassette. Jesus is not GOD's assitant. Jesus is the Word of GOD who came to the world in form human body. GOD is not creates his word. His word is not Michael who first created. His word is already there with GOD (John 1:1) so does His spirit. His word and his spirit is one with Father. Father is the source. Can we see the word of GOD? No, it is always in GOD's mind. Who knows GOD's mind? GOD Himself. To be visible GOD sent His word to be a human Jesus. So people at the time can see GOD through Jesus (John 14:9). The way Jesus talks and works is a reflection of GOD. So, it feels that GOD himself talks/ teach/ and redeem us. It is related to other names of Jesus; Imanuelle; GOD with us. GOD is not send other person (in this case Michael) to be his assistant to deliver His words or to be our saviour. In Rome 11:34, only GOD himself who know his mind. Only GOD is our saviour (Hosea 13:4).
@heribertocandelaria21404 жыл бұрын
Wow. Thank you Sir. That was a great explanation. Very clear and easy to understand. Thank you once again
@constpegasus5 жыл бұрын
Eye opening information.
@fiorini_mochachino4 жыл бұрын
Excellent treatment. Probably the best I've found. 👍
The leading Christologist, a Harvard prof, came to a Barnard NT class to lecture about Arians and very small groups for two hours. I was a grad already, slipped in just to see what was happening. After class I approached him privately and asked if he had any insights about WT theology and how my ancestors in respected Trinitarian churches could be attracted to WT. He said they are not Arian or Unitarian. Unitarians were a potent force at Harvard. He said he was so stumped about how they equste Jesus with Michael. I wrote one term paper on the Historical Jesus. Mostly tracing Son of Man theories. WT never told me resources were available. A Ivy secular college encouraged me to read scripture. WT ordered me to read only it. Raymond Brown is a good source for NT Christology. Tried to learn Koine Greek, but insist on fluency in French first. Why have the GB not learned Hebrew and Koine Greek in detail? As a girl, I thought Freddie Franz was the cat's meow. So embarrassed.
@ooklathemok73225 жыл бұрын
Thank you Eric for a well thought out presentation based on scripture. I would like to say if a person just reads Hebrews chapter 1 without watchtower glasses they will arrive at the truth that the Word is not Michael the archangel.
@joanflint21995 жыл бұрын
Wow! ooklaa the Mok, that's powerful!
@jimp40165 жыл бұрын
I like to think of "the voice of an archangel" the same as "the Captain spoke to his men with the voice of a Color (colour) Sergeant" . Thank you for this easy explanation.
@belajarmusik1234 Жыл бұрын
Hebrews 1:4-5, 13 (KJV) 4 Being made so much better than the angels, as he hath by inheritance obtained a more excellent name than they. 5 For unto which of the angels said he at any time, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee? And again, I will be to him a Father, and he shall be to me a Son? 13 But to which of the angels said he at any time, Sit on my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool?
@brooklynspeaks5716 Жыл бұрын
However, in Bible Gateway most translations use the definite article "the archangel". The Codex Sinaiticus confirms the Greek translation in the definite article also. Please research this. Thank you.
@LosBereanos Жыл бұрын
Is your point that using the definite article proves there is only one archangel or that the archangel is Jesus?
@eew80603 жыл бұрын
I commented on this video two years ago about Galatians 4:14 and how it pointed to Christ as the Angel of JHVH. Jude 9, actually does a good job as making this point as well! There Michael uses the formula of the Angel of the Name (Zech 3:2) If Michael is the Angel of the Name then he is also Wisdom-Word of the Hebrew Bible and John 1 tells us that the Word [logos] is Christ.
@patriciahines71274 жыл бұрын
Eye 👁 opening . Thanks 😊 . Jesus was already better than the angels I would think 🤔 if he created them , also everything in heaven and earth 🌍 , so in Hebrews 1:9 companions is something of an eye opening for me thanks 😊 for sharing , also Hebrews 1:4 power point become better . Thanks again .
@91aocampo5 жыл бұрын
Here are some verses that Confirm Jesus is God: Isaiah 9:6 For a child is born to us, a son is given to us. The government will rest on his shoulders. And he will be called: Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace. Psalms 102: 25 -27 talks about God the Father and this same verse is found in the new testament when is talking about Jesus...Hebrews 1:6-8. If you are truly saved, you will be set free from all that is oppression you, addictions, deppression, etc. That can only come from the true Christ and yielding your heart. You do become a new creation and you must renew your mind by feeding on the Word of God. Our minds want to go back to what we were. That's is why is so important to read the bible and learn what it means to be made in the image of God. We are meant to become like Christ and that is an impossible task if you don't have the Holy Spirit. The Spirit of the Lord will enable you to walk with Christ
@TimKollat5 жыл бұрын
Those versus in hebrews by Paul are the ones I use and think they are the sledge hammer that smashes the "Jesus was an angel before his birth" or "Jesus is now an angel back in heaven". Its like Paul knew exactly what was going to be said about Jesus and nipped it right in the bud with those statements. Or people back then were already claiming that Jesus existed in heaven prior to his birth as an angel and Paul was shutting that down...one or the other
@purpleduke774 жыл бұрын
I found that video so clear and straightforward, very informative and a great help for witnessing to witnesses. My question though, If Jesus is not the Archangel Michael, then who is he? Will you be doing a vlog on the Nature of the Christ?
@LosBereanos4 жыл бұрын
Yes. I'm planning a very extensive series on that which would include analysis of the Trinity doctrine as well as the doctrine of the non-preexistence of Christ. However, it takes such a long time to put together each video that I fear it will be the summer before I get around to it.
@Betsy292 жыл бұрын
@@LosBereanos waiting to hear your video on nature of christ, did you make one brother
@BeroeanPickets2 жыл бұрын
@@Betsy29 Perhaps this playlist will help: kzbin.info/aero/PLyyw76AUJTT2Vi1dHg_4l732poxNCn8IN
@archmichael36985 жыл бұрын
I'm not JW, I didn't go into it with any preconceived notion, as I searched for Truth, God revealed the truth. Why is Michael depicted slaying the Dragon, that ancient serpent, the Devil and Satan. Michael defeats Satan. Jesus defeats Satan... Luckily those blessed will be here with Christ as He returns to speak for Himself. Many will be lost due to their own arrogance. Bless
@BeroeanPickets5 жыл бұрын
You are basing your conclusion on human reasoning, not on what the Bible actually says.
@archmichael36985 жыл бұрын
No, I'm basing it off my experience, what the scriptures say, and the Truth. You assume you know my thoughts and my relationship with God?... You have know idea who I am, how you you assume you understand why I have my beliefs through 50 words. You are clearly decieved. Start by humbling yourself, and acknowledging you don't have every answer. Human.
@archmichael36985 жыл бұрын
The Lord decends with the shout of the Archangel, Michael is the only named Archangel in scripture... I'm not the cherry picking type but this alone speaks for itself unless the Lord spoken of in Thessalonians 4:16 is Jesus. Daniel 12 also speaks of Michael standing, or Arising leading to deliverance... Unless Jesus isn't the deliverer? Keep in mind 2020 Strong's Hebrew is Deliverance. It's not a question. You will learn.
@BeroeanPickets5 жыл бұрын
@@archmichael3698 I do not engage in discussions on the Bible with people who are verbally abusive.
@1stvivification702 жыл бұрын
Dan. 10: 5-6 describes Jesus prior to his life on earth. Rev. 1: 13-15 describes Jesus after his resurrection. Both scriptures speak of the same person…Jesus. This being the case, how can Jesus speak of Michael the archangel coming to help him at Dan. 10:13.
@brucebarnard8 ай бұрын
There is a KZbin channel, NWT Defended, which has a good video which clearly shows why the Son of God who became Jesus Christ is Michael the archangel. Its entitled The Case for Jesus being Michael the Archangel(NWT). Check it out.
@jonathand29995 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this video
@nolimetangere23642 жыл бұрын
I enjoyed this presentation. One thing I did notice was your reference that angels could not reproduce. I am under the assumption that Gen 6:4 states the angels could reproduce and even reproduce with humankind.
@BeroeanPickets2 жыл бұрын
@NoliMeTangere23 - angelic beings that took human form and wives did so in opposition to God and forsook their proper place in God's arrangement. Angels are spirit creatures and not fleshly in their own realm.
@brucebarnard8 ай бұрын
There is a KZbin channel, NWT Defended, which has a good video which clearly shows why the Son of God who became Jesus Christ is Michael the archangel. Its entitled The Case for Jesus being Michael the Archangel(NWT). Check it out.
@1atatom5 жыл бұрын
Can anyone direct me to an explanation of John 9:38? Jesus is worshipped here and seems to be OK with it.
@archangeljesus43693 жыл бұрын
The actual Bible of the Jehovah's Witnesses New World Translation everybody oughta be reading says obeisance not worship
@sonofbrittania55215 жыл бұрын
amazing research! thank you Eric! I have just left the org after I did some research and found out that JW have been part of the UN, which broke my heart. I had a question that I would really like an answer to. How are we REALLY supposed to pray?
@shanebekker5 жыл бұрын
Answer these questions from the Gods word and find out: 1. Who is the hearer of prayer 2. Who did the Israelites and men of old pray to and how 3. How did Jesus say we should pray 4. Rev 8:3-4 5. Then add to that Jesus words at John 14:14
@mirnademirdj5 жыл бұрын
Can you please share with me ur research about jw being part of the UN?
@sonofbrittania55215 жыл бұрын
@@mirnademirdj yes, gladly. ill post some links for you. www.theguardian.com/uk/2001/oct/08/religion.world www.jwfacts.com/watchtower/united-nations-association.php
@sonofbrittania55215 жыл бұрын
@@mirnademirdj its also on Wikipedia, in the section "JW interaction with the UN" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jehovah%27s_Witnesses_and_the_United_Nations
@tootychristo12815 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much Eric: very enlightening Video. I have only two clarifying questions for you: 1. Hebrews 1: indicates that Jesus was anointed over his "companions" or "fellows". Who are these fellows and when was he anointed over them? Would it be reasonable to believe that Jesus was of same nature as his companions before his anointing? 2. What is the difference between "devine nature"(Deity) and angelic nature?
@alg1902 жыл бұрын
Jesus was not Devine in his prehumen existence (see Phil 2:9-11). Angel is just a title with various responsibilities and power. Compare this to General, Captain, Private in the military. They all have various ranks, authority and power that is delegated to them. They are all human. Heavenly beings are all spiritual with various levels of responsibilities.
@mitchmiller23825 жыл бұрын
Eric, you backed up to Hebrews 1:2, but left out a very important verse - 1:3! The first part of that verse says that Jesus is "the radiance of His (God's glory and the EXACT REPRESENTATION of His nature. (NASB)" The Greek word there is character, which is only used here in the NT, but is used in the Septuagint (Greek OT) in Lev. 13:28 for the scar of a burn. I would think of that as somewhat similar to a brand made by a branding iron on cattle. No creature is the exact representation of God!. The reason that Jesus is spoken of as having become better than the angels, it's not because he once was one of them, but because of His voluntarily assumed nature as a human (Philippians 2:6-11), and because He was a man, He was already in the position of being LOWER than the angels (Psalm 8:5). He became better than the angels because of His physical resurrection and His ascension to Heaven and His having been seated with His Father (Ephesians 1:19,20). The whole context and theme of the book of Hebrews is "Christ is greater than" the angels, Aaron, Melchizedek, etc.
@cto5119875 жыл бұрын
Great study on the Michael NOT being Jesus BUT you did go on to mention that the 24 thrones in heaven are angels/archangels because this was John 1900 years ago and can't represent saints. The 24 thrones with elders is typically seen as the raptured saints and not angels because they are depicted with crowns which are given to saints. Another example of this not being 1900 years ago is that the very passage is shown to be what will be "hereafter", yet future. - SHOWS THE 24 THRONES ARE YET FUTURE EVENTS (REVELATION OF THINGS TO COME - hereafter): Rev 4:1 After this I looked, and, behold, a door was opened in heaven: and the first voice which I heard was as it were of a trumpet talking with me; which said, Come up hither, and I will shew thee things which must be hereafter. - SHOWS BEFOREHAND IN 1ST CHAPTER OF REVELATION WHAT WILL BE SHOWN - past, present, future: Rev 1:19 Write the things which thou hast seen, and the things which are, and the things which shall be hereafter; - THIS VERSE PROVES CROWNS ARE WORN BY SAINTS, can angels receive crowns? likely saints on thrones after catching up of saints: Rev_2:10 Fear none of those things which thou shalt suffer: behold, the devil shall cast some of you into prison, that ye may be tried; and ye shall have tribulation ten days: be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life. - Good study, thank you for helping me see what some of my JW friends mean when speaking on Michael and Jesus being the same and why. God bless!
@BeroeanPickets5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing those thoughts. I would suggest however that to say that "crown" can only apply to Jesus and the anointed overlooks the fact that it is a symbol of rulership. There is no moral element to the word. You have the majesty of Christ's rulership represented by the word, but also the wickedness of Satan's rulership is described using the same word. (Compare Re 19:12 with Re 13:1) Therefore, the crowns the 24 elders are wearing simply demonstrate that they are rulers, but it doesn't detail what they rule over. Certainly, if human kings can wear crowns, why not archangels? (For further research, check out: biblehub.com/hebrew/5850.htm) Revelation 4:4 doesn't depict a future coronation. It just states "Around the throne were twenty-four thrones, and seated on the thrones were twenty-four elders, clothed in white garments, with golden crowns on their heads."
@cto5119875 жыл бұрын
@@BeroeanPickets It's always nice to sharpen swords with fellow believers in Christ and for the edification of the saints and those who would happen on these conversations. Regarding the time setting of Revelation 4 you say it does not depict the future yet the passage starts with the time stamp of what will be revealed: Come up hither, and I will shew thee things which must be hereafter. (hereafter being future). I can only rely on the scriptures as to the timing which is why I present them here. The scriptures are provided in my past comment as well so your conclusion that it is not future would have to be illuminated with scripture if you would as that is the basis for truth. _ On the matter of crowns I have provided the scriptures below which certainly represent the saints receiving crowns. That is not to say that Jesus does not have crowns but the elders (can angels be elders?) lay their crowns at the feet of Jesus as an act of worship. Rulership is certainly given to the saints according to scripture. Is it your understanding that this is not so? Just some points with scriptures which lead me to believe what I have stated in my previous comment. Please if you are willing to give your reasoning to discount the scriptures I have provided in regard to my points about the Rev 4 time setting as well as the crowns given to saints I would be willing to study the matter further if I am in error or if otherwise to hear if this has profited you in any way. - - Rulership to saints scripture below as well: First sentence shows thrones and judgment (rulership) given unto them (raptured saints) followed by tribulation saints being pointed out who were beheaded and seen in addition to those already on thrones. Rev 20:4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years. ***SCRIPTURES SHOWING CROWNS/REWARDS TO SAINTS*** 1Th_2:19 For what is our hope, or joy, or crown of rejoicing? Are not even ye in the presence of our Lord Jesus Christ at his coming? 2Ti_4:8 Henceforth there is laid up for me a crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, shall give me at that day: and not to me only, but unto all them also that love his appearing. Jas_1:12 Blessed is the man that endureth temptation: for when he is tried, he shall receive the crown of life, which the Lord hath promised to them that love him. 1Pe_5:4 And when the chief Shepherd shall appear, ye shall receive a crown of glory that fadeth not away. Rev_2:10 Fear none of those things which thou shalt suffer: behold, the devil shall cast some of you into prison, that ye may be tried; and ye shall have tribulation ten days: be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life. Rev_3:11 Behold, I come quickly: hold that fast which thou hast, that no man take thy crown.
@joycefinney27355 жыл бұрын
cto511987 Rev 4v4. The elders here are not the elders of the church but the elders of the angels,because here,before the Lord’s second coming,they are sitting on thrones already (Matt;19:28;Rev.20:4).Among God’s creation the angels are the most ancient ones.Their elders are the elders of the whole creation of God.That they sit on thrones with golden crowns on their heads indicates that they must be the ones who rule the universe until the millennium kingdom,when the authority to rule the earth will be given to the overcoming saints.(Heb.2;5-9;Rev.2;26-27; 20:4).That they are clothed in white garments and have a harp and golden bowls full of incense(5;8) indicates that now they are also priests before God; in the millennial kingdom,however the reigning overcomes will be the priests of God and of Christ(20:6).The elders’ golden crowns indicate that they are also ruling ones.Therefore they are priests serving God and kings reigning over His creation. The white garments here indicate that these angelic elders are sinless,and unlike the redeemed saints,have no need to be washed in the blood of the Lamb(7;14).
@cto5119875 жыл бұрын
@@joycefinney2735 Hi Joyce, my understanding is quite different from yours. You mention that the elders must be angels because the second coming has not happened yet. I must differ based on what I glean from the scriptures. The scriptures below clearly show the elders singing a new song saying "for thou wast slain, and hast redeemed us to God by thy blood out of every kindred, and tongue, and people, and nation." This is not in question that the elders must be redeemed church age saints (not mentioned after 7 church's). Another point of difference between us which the scriptures clearly reveal is that these same saved (redeemed REV5) are seen in heaven before REV 7 where you mention the saints are clothed in white. You see the REV5 redeemed saints have been already caught up (2Thess2) and are in heaven then later the tribulation saints REV7 are shown who would die (beheaded) for their faith. - Would love to see scriptures which would show how my understanding does not bear scrutiny. Thank you for your insights. - SCRIPTURE REFERENCE FOR ELDERS BEING SAINTS BELOW *** Rev 5:8 And when he had taken the book, the four beasts and four and ***twenty elders*** fell down before the Lamb, having every one of them harps, and golden vials full of odours, which are the prayers of saints. Rev 5:9 ***And they*** sung a new song, saying, Thou art worthy to take the book, and to open the seals thereof: for thou wast slain, and ***hast redeemed us*** to God by thy blood out of every kindred, and tongue, and people, and nation;
@BeroeanPickets5 жыл бұрын
@@cto511987 I don't think you gave enough thought to what I was saying. My words were: "Revelation 4:4 doesn't depict a future coronation". This was in answer to your assertion: "The 24 thrones with elders is typically seen as the raptured saints and not angels because they are depicted with crowns which are given to saints." You're speaking of a coronation, i.e., crowns being given to saints. But in my reading of Revelation 4:4, the elders already have crowns, crowns they received at some point in the past. So while Revelation 4:4 depicts a future event, it does not depict a coronation. Therefore, saying that it is future--something I agree with--doesn't prove that these 24 elders represent saints. If it said that the 24 elders were given crowns and that their white garments were washed in the blood of the lamb, that would indicate they are the saints, but since they are seen to already possess both crown and white garment, and since the saints are depicted in this particular vision, not sitting on thrones, but standing in front of them, I feel that the 24 elders must depict something other than the saints. I also gave you scriptures showing that crowns are warn by humans, demons, demonic metaphors, and the saints, so showing that the saints wear crowns does not prove that the 24 elders are saints. Finally, one of the elders is seen talking to John (Re 5:5), so while the event pictured in the vision is future, in John's present (96 C.E.) one of the elders (present, not future) is talking to him about the future vision. Anyway, the whole thing is symbolic, so we cannot be dogmatic about things. I'm just going with what to me is the more consistent and harmonious conclusion. If you feel differently, that's cool. I am not interested in "crossing swords". Be well.
@reedstd30584 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this video. i had a few questions: 1. Hebrews 1: 5 - Why does it say here "Today I have become your father... he will become my son...." ? I have watched your videos on the subject of 'The Nature of God's son..' So when Jesus is the 'only-begotten son' since his creation, in what respect does Jesus 'Become' a son to God? - Also, are not all angels 'sons of God'? - Hebrews 1:9 - ".... anointed you with the oil of exultation more than your companions" How can angels be Jesus' companions when Jesus was the One through whom, for whom and by whom all things were created?. Does not his unique position as 'Creator' and 'Lagos' put him way him above the angels? Thank you.
@BeroeanPickets4 жыл бұрын
Did you watch the whole video or have you assumed that my position is that Jesus is the Archangel Michael?
@fkrsnofficial60955 ай бұрын
I’m not gonna say if Jesus is Michael or not No human knows for certainty Jesus will reveal the truth when he returns! Praise YAH!
@LosBereanos4 ай бұрын
So you're saying that we can't trust what the Bible tells us at Hebrews 1:5-11?
@paulsimpson72485 жыл бұрын
Hi Eric I agree with you . I was disfellowshiped for not agreeing with there teaching on 1 thes 4:16 He said let are Lord rebuke you, notice who Jude refers to as are Lord it is not Jehovha Michelle is one of the 4 angels the stand around Gods throne. If you look at Jude and pen down all caricters , like God , Michelle, are Lord Jesus , it revels a surprise. it is clear that thay are 2 different beings Enoch was a book that Jude read it contains who michel is , and it is difrent to Jesus Kind regards Paul
@paulsimpson72485 жыл бұрын
You sound like a good man to me, Keep reading the bible , God chooses who he won't , not men.
@refr19835 жыл бұрын
I'm very curious about your videos they're very informational and back it up with scripture. Can I just ask you flat out.... are you a trinitarian now? If so praise the Lord. If not what is your belief now.
@BeroeanPickets5 жыл бұрын
No, not a Trinitarian. I am preparing a video on it but it will take some time.
@brucebarnard8 ай бұрын
There is a KZbin channel, NWT Defended, which has a good video which clearly shows why the Son of God who became Jesus Christ is Michael the archangel. Its entitled The Case for Jesus being Michael the Archangel(NWT). Check it out.
@robinsk56445 жыл бұрын
There is one God, and only one God. This one God spans eternity from forever past to forever future. This one God has been revealed to us in three persons: Father, Son and Holy Spirit. God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit. Jesus, the Son of God, and God the Son, laid down His life for us all.
@pearltears80394 жыл бұрын
1 Thessalonians 4:16 16 because the Lord* himself will descend from heaven with a commanding call, with an archangel’s voice and with God’s trumpet, and those who are dead in union with Christ will rise first. This SCRIPTURE IS WHY THEY BELIEVE JESUS IS MICHAEL.....an angel and this is the CHRIST but still an Angel....missleading many The JESUS WE SHOULD TRUST IN IS A WORD Jesus is the WORD, and as a WORD it has meaning.... jesus is JEHOVAH'S SPOKEN WORD......and thats why from the beginning jesus was... and through jesus Jehovah SPOKE everything into existence.... Jesus is our SAVIOR BECAUSE OF THE MEANING BEHIND THE WORD jesus...... As a WORD Greek translation to English translation, jesus means JEHOVAH IS SALVATION Jesus the Name above all Name's because of the Meaning of the Name Jesus IN ENGLISH In the original language the WORD used is translated the Spoken word of JEHOVAH This is why jesus is our SAVIOR because jesus is THE WORD..... THAT BEING SAID......many will come in the name of Jesus and Claim to be the CHRIST and deceive many... and if you know your bible then you should know that there are many person's who are named in English as jesus....but then youll Hebrew to Greek transition into English as JOSHUA....depending on the translation and from what other translation.... You have Hoshea, who Moses called Jehoshua the son of nun in NUMBERS 13:16 who is Joshua the chosen one to bring the people to the promise land..... And in ACTS 7:45 It says Jesus * with the foot note reading this is Joshua And HEBREWS 4:8 says Jesus * footnote says this is Joshua... That being said.... Joshua is the one who meets the Head Angel of Jehovah Army in JOSHUA 5:13-15 and in ZECHARIAH 3Joshua the high priest is standing in front of the Angel of Jehovah and it says Satan is at his side And in JUDE # 9 it talkes about Michael the archangel disputing with the devil over Moses body....which makes it seam like Michael is Joshua because Joshua took Moses place...But then the only time they talk about anyone and the Devil is when the Devil brings Jesus up the mountain to be tempted..... BUT ITS ALL TO DISTRACT YOU FROM THE SIMPLE WORD OF JAH.... ONLY 2 THINGS JEHOVAH ASK OF US AS HIS CREATURES THAT if we know and learn TRULY WHAT GODLY LOVE IS....then we can trully live HAPPY..... MARK 12:29-31 MATTHEW 22:36-40 ISAIAH 43:11 I, I AM JEHOVAH BESIDES ME THERE IS NO SAVIOR
@lucillehills40125 жыл бұрын
People are crazy. What about the Declaracion of the Law and the prophets by means of God’s Holy Spirit with what Jehovah fired his holy prophets of old time? In the book of Deuteronomy 18: 15,18,19 jehovah declared that Jesus would be a prophet and also is backed up by another holy of God that was also fired by God’s Holy Spirit , Acts 3:22,23. ???? When did all this confusing started ????. Also Revelation, the book of revelation is a revelation of the things that will happen in the time of the not when Jesus ascended to heaven....
@margaretislas2916 Жыл бұрын
I have one question Eric. It is regarding their teachings that they will fight with Jesus in Armageddon . They are recently promoting the teachings that in order to be safe, their members needs to help financially and in all the angles shoulder to them the “ anointed “ Because when they arrive in the clouds with Jesus they will reject those who did not obey them. In my limited understanding it is Jesus and God’s myriads of myriads of angels as declared by Enoc ( Jude 14) We can see the Jude refered to the angels; he is one of the anointed but he did not feted himself as coming with Jesus… Please make a video explaining this new tactic of them to fleece the flock. Thanks so much Eric for your wonderful videos. This one is very handy…
@henrymovses84245 жыл бұрын
Very strong explanation about Jesus not being an archangel. My only point is that explanation from 1 Thess.4 isn't strong enough, as you still try to convince that its the Jesus's voice of archangel Michael. Its not, according to many translations Jehovah would use Michael an archangel to announce Jesus's descendant process - Michael's own voice would accompany his descendant, exact same way when earthly presidents enter into the large gathering rooms its not them that announce it but someone else always lesser than the president himself and it is usually accompanied with music and even trumpet one. So my point is that when bible speaks about with the voice of Michael it doesn't mean that it is Jesus's voice but it would be announced by an archangel Michael. Thanks for your hard work.
@billkylin83535 жыл бұрын
Awesome Teaching 🙏🙏🙏💪❤😎
@DonjohnsonBG4 жыл бұрын
Sir Daniel 12:1 says Michael is the one who delivers “thy people”, because you fail to read verse 2 you think Michael is not Jesus but notice what verse 2 states “and many that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake” obviously by Michael and as 1 Thessalonians 4:16 says to the voice of the Archangel. Did you not know that Angel means messenger(look it up) so Micheal this Chief or Highest messenger has the power to resurrect both good and evil now notice what Christ says in John 5:25,28-29 “Verily, verily, I say unto you, The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God: and they that hear shall live. 28 Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, Question Who’s voice? 29 And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation. Can’t you see this is the same event, believe or not Michael and Jesus is the same person.
@BeroeanPickets4 жыл бұрын
I'm afraid you are jumping to come conclusions which are leading you down the wrong path. For a clear analysis of Daniel chapter 12, please view this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/kKG5iHaaqJyKZrs
@DonjohnsonBG4 жыл бұрын
Beroean Pickets yes the conclusion I see clearly from scripture is that Christ is a Angel or a Messenger of the Lord,who do you think was at the burning bush with Moses? It wasn’t a Cherubim Angel it was Christ that Moses had to take his shoes off for because he was on Holy ground. Now notice it says the Angel of the Lord spoke to Moses in behalf of God which is a messenger
@BeroeanPickets4 жыл бұрын
@@DonjohnsonBG Again, you are making an interpretation based on your belief but are ignoring the evidence of Scripture. Who communicated with Moses on God's behalf? Jesus or an angel of God? According to the writer of Hebrews, it was an angelic messenger who spoke to Moses. “For if the word spoken through angels proved to be firm, and every transgression and disobedient act received a retribution in harmony with justice; how shall we escape if we have neglected a salvation of such greatness in that it began to be spoken through [our] Lord and was verified for us by those who heard him, while God joined in bearing witness with signs as well as portents and various powerful works and with distributions of holy spirit according to his will?” (Heb 2:2-4)
@DonjohnsonBG4 жыл бұрын
Beroean Pickets it was The Son of God then know as the Angel of the Lord that talked with Moses. Angel means messenger(look it up) And this same Angel in Exodus 23:20-23 the Lord says “Behold, I send an Angel before thee, to keep thee in the way, and to bring thee into the place which I have prepared. 21 Beware of him, and obey his voice, provoke him not; for he will not pardon your transgressions: for my name is in him. 22 But if thou shalt indeed obey his voice, and do all that I speak; then I will be an enemy unto thine enemies, and an adversary unto thine adversaries. 23 For mine Angel shall go before thee, and bring thee in unto the Amorites, and the Hittites, and the Perizzites, and the Canaanites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites: and I will cut them off. Now Notice this Angel or messenger has the power to pardon your transgressions and God’s name is in him. This Angel is the Son of God which after his incarnation possess the same power In Mark 2:10 Christ has the power to forgive sins and John 5:43 Christ says I am come in my Father’s name. You know full well that an Angel(Cherubim) can’t forgive sins so this has to be the Son of God
@BeroeanPickets4 жыл бұрын
@@DonjohnsonBG Sorry, but arbitrary interpretations without scriptural foundation just don't cut it with us. Better you go to Jehovah's Witnesses who are trained to accept what men tell them without checking it out for themselves.
@ronaldsimmons95175 жыл бұрын
Intellectually honest. Thanks for your work in exposing an organization where scripture is twisted to fit a particular theology. I've had numerous visits from JWs and whenever I bring up Hebrews 1, they begin to pack their bags and leave - they simply cannot answer that chapter!!! I had one lady answer it only by presenting Proverbs 8:22 stating that it describes the creation of Jesus by Jehovah. However, according to Hebrew scholars it says no such thing. First of all, the chapter starts off with the topic of "Wisdom" and how it is likened to a woman. Later, any pronouns (such as 'me') are in the feminine, so if true, Jesus is referred to as a female. The word used is sometimes "created" in v22, but the KJV uses the term "possessed" to mean God possessed Wisdom from the very beginning. Amazing how they hang on a tiny verse to try get away with a major theological point.
@michaelbemvindo5 жыл бұрын
It would be nice if you and make a presentation on birthdays. and the celebration of Xmas. I do believe that celebration of Christmas has no significance with Christ and His birth. However birthdays? Thanks
@baruq47865 жыл бұрын
Hello Mike. About birthday, you can read what Perimeno has to say about on this page: www.baruq.uk/perimeno_Letters_0812_Birthdays.html
@atserehenry2813 Жыл бұрын
Insightful. Thank you.
@brucebarnard8 ай бұрын
There is a KZbin channel, NWT Defended, which has a good video which clearly shows why the Son of God who became Jesus Christ is Michael the archangel. Its entitled The Case for Jesus being Michael the Archangel(NWT). Check it out.
@marianszydowski1494 жыл бұрын
Thank You from Poland. Dziękuję z Polski.
@RitaMalikfour5 жыл бұрын
I have a question I’m very confused over, Jesus, the son of God is now I’ve If seven arch angles didn’t that make Jesus less then Jesus the son God or an I very confusedthere are seven arch angles I googled , could be wrong? What a mess
@DonjohnsonBG4 жыл бұрын
Sir the Bible doesn’t reveal there’s more than one archangel, look at Gabriel who stood in the presence of God(Luke 1:19) we know he’s a high rank Angel but he’s not Chief as a archangel. Same with Lucifer before his fall he wasn’t a Chief if he was he wouldn’t wanted to be like the most high
@BeroeanPickets4 жыл бұрын
If Michael is the only arch angel, what of it? That doesn't mean Jesus is Michael.
@DonjohnsonBG4 жыл бұрын
Beroean Pickets Sir Michael is Jesus don’t you know Angel means messenger( look it up) what the Bible normally call Angels are actually Cherubims and Seraphims. Now please tell me does any Cherubim or Seraphim has the power to resurrect? No! There’s Only two that can which is the Father and his Son, now if you notice Michael this Chief Messenger in Daniel 12:1-2 delivers “thy people” also deliver those that sleep in the dust of the earth which 1 Thessalonians 4:16 says the dead in Christ shall raise first by the voice of the Archangel. also in Daniel 3:25 Nebuchadnezzar saw the Son of God in the fiery furnace w/ the 3 Hebrew boys and notice what he said in verse 28 that God sent his Angel or Messenger to deliver his Servants. now if you don’t believe the Angel or Messenger that delivered them is the Son of God who is Christ then I’m done I can’t convince you
@vintage63464 жыл бұрын
@@DonjohnsonBG, 1 Thess. 4:16 says, "For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a loud command, with the voice of an archangel, and with the trumpet of God, and the dead in Christ will be the first to rise." It doesn't say that Jesus is an archangel. There was "a loud command, with the voice of an archangel, and with the trumpet of God". Daniel 3:28 says, "Nebuchadnezzar declared, “Blessed be the God of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, who has sent His angel and delivered His servants who trusted in Him...". There is no mention of an archangel in this account. Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego weren't dead and had no need for resurrection.
@BeroeanPickets4 жыл бұрын
@@DonjohnsonBG If you watch the video I referenced in the previous comment, you'll see that your interpretation that the "waking up" is not a reference to a literal resurrection, but something else that fits with the context of the passage.
@DonjohnsonBG4 жыл бұрын
Beroean Pickets ok Sir have a good day
@Carla-in1cm5 жыл бұрын
The word Arch and the word Chief..is a high or highest ranking ..the definition of Arch is highest in order. Also, Jehovah called the Angels his very first creation, and together they created Earth..when Jesus came to Earth..God Jehovah said he sent his ONLY begotten Son..
@hebrewwarrior31135 жыл бұрын
Hiding verses I see you missed Acts 5:30-31 where it states Jesus as the prince of israel now is not Michael the prince of Israel and what is a prince, a prince is the Son of a king (God) making michael and the other chief Princes sons of God like it is written in the book of Genesis 6:2-7 when the sons of God came and took themselves daughters of Men and gave birth to nephilims and giants!The promised Saviour is called by ( Daniel 9:25 ) "Messiah the Prince" (Heb. nagid); compare Acts 3:15 ; 5:31 . The angel Micheal is called ( Daniel 12:1 ) a "prince" (Heb. sar, whence "Sarah," the "princes"). This word occurs quite frequently in our English Bible, mostly in the Old Testament. While it is never used to denote royal parentage (compare 1 Chronicles 29:24), it often indicates actual royal or ruling power, together with royal dignity and authority. As a rule, the name is given to human beings; in a few instances it is applied to God and Christ, the angels and the devil. In Matthew 2:6 the word rendered "princes" might be translated "princely cities"; at least, this seems to be implied. Here the term hegemon, "leader," "ruler," "prince," is used, undoubtedly to hint at the fact that Bethlehem was the native city of a great prince. In the other New Testament passages the word archon, "a potentate," "a person in authority," "a magistrate," occurs most frequently (compare Matthew 9:34; 12:24; 20:25 (the Revised Version (British and American) "ruler"); Mark 3:22; John 12:31; 14:30; 16:11; 1 Corinthians 2:6,8 the King James Version; Ephesians 2:2; Revelation 1:5 (the Revised Version (British and American) "ruler")). In most of these instances the term "prince" refers to the devil. In Acts 3:15; 5:31, the word archegos, "leader," is employed referring to Christ as the author of life and salvation (compare Hebrews 12:2, where the term archegos is rendered "author" (Revised Version) or "captain" (Revised Version margin)). The Old Testament contains a number of different words mostly rendered "prince" or "princes" in the English Versions of the Bible. (1) sar: In Joshua 5:14 the mysterious armed stranger seen by Joshua near Jericho calls himself the "prince of the host of Yahweh": a high military title applied to a superhuman being. In Isaiah 9:6, the name is given to the child representing the future Messiah. The term "Prince of Peace" denotes the eminent position and the peaceful reign of the Messianic king: the highest human title in its most ideal sense. Daniel 8:11: here, again, as in Joshua 5:14, occurs the phrase "prince of the host." In Daniel 8:25 "the prince of princes" refers to God Himself: the highest human title in its absolute sense applied to God. Daniel 10:21: "Michael your prince." Michael the archangel is here called the prince of the Jewish people. He is the princely representative of God's people in the sight of God, a royal title suggesting high power and alliance with God in the great struggle going on between Him and the powers of darkness. Daniel 12:1: here Michael is called "the great prince" who standeth for the children of Israel; supplementing Daniel 10:21. In Daniel 10:13: "the prince of the kingdom of Persia" (compare 10:20, "the prince of Persia," "the prince of Greece"), the expression is used in the same general sense as in Daniel 10:21. Each individual nation is represented as guided by a spiritual being that may or may not be an ally of God in His combat with the devil. In the majority of cases, though, the term sar is applied
@pfevrier014 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this video..I have someone on my job , member of JW. We work together and on one day he gave me the yellow book. I had to examen. Yesterday we had a discussion on the item that Michael was Jesus..This is absurd to believe, and there are more false statements in the book.. He became angry..Yet,he had ask me to read the book and speak my thoughts about the content..Now he wants the book back..( and will give it to someone who does appreciate what is written in.. Sorry i said..a gift is a gift..It's mine..no thinking of returning the book..
@IAM-kg5pq5 жыл бұрын
@ approx 8.34 you mention one of the 24 elders is seen talking to John approx 1900 years ago. However, I believe you have overlooked the fact that 1) this is a vision and 2) John was seeing these events unfold, not in his era but had been taken forward - by inspiration - to be in the Lord's day.
@RiskeFactor4 жыл бұрын
John 5:25 (KJV 1900): Verily, verily, I say unto you, The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God: and they that hear shall live. Compare with 1 Thessalonians 4:16
@MarilynNemeth5 жыл бұрын
Good lesson on 24 elders with crowns. As JW teach these were the anointed 144000 resurrected, the clearness shown is they have existed before these men bought from the earth, so they can not be the same. Wish the witnesses would put reason in their acceptance of scripture instead of blindly follow men's teachings.