Former Boeing Everett... I was there when we were putting GE90's on our Triple Sevens... ginormous engine that would not fit inside an average home...
@alicelund1475 ай бұрын
They developed it for 12 years and it is not yet delivered to any airline. Sounds expensive, it better be really good.
@kevin-parratt-artist4 ай бұрын
... so says the layman, over drinks.. When a company such as Boeing pushes things along, driven by accountants, profits, racing for market dominance, etc., corners are cut, planes crash, people die. All in good time, my friend. All in good time. 🤝 🍻
@_.twixxx4 ай бұрын
@@alicelund147 certification takes a long time now. especially for boeing, cuz the faa is right on their tail after the 737 max crashes and poor quality control. it could’ve been delivered to airlines in late 2020 but there were delays, and problems with the engines that ge provided due to a component in the engine.
@MGA19a3 ай бұрын
@@_.twixxxcould have should have was intended …. yup sounds like „good“ project 😂
@prasenjittripura469125 күн бұрын
developing engine is not as simple as wiping ur as**s😂😂😂😂
@Hanking-Warry5 ай бұрын
I thought it was "all over" when Rolls Royce announced their new engine a short time ago.
@charlesalexander43393 ай бұрын
Marvelous engineering 👌.
@samuelboswell99215 ай бұрын
People have no concept of the complexity of these engines. Not only the actual design but putting the design into action. The number of internal components is mind boggling and each one has to operate under enormous heat and pressure for thousands of hours, perfectly. Often, new materials are developed that can withstand the heat and pressure and other manufacturers are used to provide these parts on time and perfect. This takes time, lots of time.
@KrisFlix3 ай бұрын
These engines are just ridiculous. It amazes me how man kind created these. The amount of power is astounding, almost unreal.
@Aviation-h9r5 ай бұрын
Happy 20k sub's 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🗣🗣🗣🗣🗣🗣🗣🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
@sannurtas58934 ай бұрын
Yes. I got it! Very good news that the GE9X is ready to fly with quality and in safety conditions. A pity that Boeing airplanes are not as reliable and mostly grounded.
@vishalgaurav44112 ай бұрын
How did you create that hyperlink?
@aravindkumar084 ай бұрын
Nice one.. But getting a type certificate may delay further to 2027 by considering the current situation and issues found at Thrust links..
@j.heilig72394 ай бұрын
It’s not “ALL OVER!” Clickbait crap.
@JoseAngel-iv5eu3 ай бұрын
GE aviation engines proud American make, love. the best engines.
@ibrahimbilal50965 ай бұрын
Crazy when you look at the GE9X when compared to a normal engine For reffrence it looks likr this (oO) look at the engine No 2 attached to the boeing 747 at 5:46
@simiot13 ай бұрын
Be nice to see a 777-X flying with an airline...
@electric7487Ай бұрын
Video is supposed to be about a GE engine. Thumbnail shows an engine with a very obviously Rolls-Royce fan.
@User00000000000000049 күн бұрын
It's about the GE Neen-Ecks Engine
@finleyfendt37505 ай бұрын
How oh how are you going to keep them on the wings ?
@User00000000000000049 күн бұрын
self-tappers
@errorerror13375 ай бұрын
Sounds like AI generated garbage and lots of fluff 🚮
@michaelflinn77844 ай бұрын
Will it stop boeings plunging out of the sky?
@earlhamil7313 ай бұрын
Does it stay on the wing in flight?
@User00000000000000049 күн бұрын
Only if you use self-tappers and zip ties.
@ez2000co5 ай бұрын
Infomercial
@Hero007ization4 ай бұрын
Just don't screw up your clients like P & W
@GemminaDonati4 ай бұрын
"The GE 9X engine hold the record of being the largest as well as the most powerplant for commercial engines" what? 😂 I hate AI-generated content, you're killing civilization, literally
@DMD787105 ай бұрын
I don't understand how this engine makes sense for the 8x/9x? It produces less thrust than the 115B.
@user-yt1985 ай бұрын
Magic is in the 777X wings. Composite, high aspect ratio wings create less drag, so engines can have less thrust. GE90 with less thrust can have higher by-pass ratio fans which now becomes GE9X, with better efficiency. Larger wing area also means better lift which allows more aircraft weight, which in turn translates to longer fuselage and more seats. 777 becomes 777X.
@_.twixxx4 ай бұрын
nope actually more than the ge90. it broke its record.
@user-yt1984 ай бұрын
@@_.twixxx Nope. GE9X is larger than GE90 in size and weight, but not in thrust.
@_.twixxx4 ай бұрын
@@user-yt198 “On November 10, 2017, a GE9X engine reached a record thrust of 134,300 lbf (597 kN) in Peebles, a new Guinness World Record breaking the GE90-115B 127,900 lbf (569 kN) record set in 2002.[15][16] The block test engine ran at its operational limits, at triple red-line conditions: maximum fan speed, maximum core speed, and maximum exhaust gas temperature. Icing tests started in Winnipeg at the end of 2017. The initial 777X flight-test engines were shipped in 2018 for an initial 777-9 flight in early 2019.[17] A quarter of the certification testing was done by May 2018: icing, crosswind/inlet distortion, inlet distortion , fan and booster blade vibrations, HP turbine blade vibrations and thermal survey.[13]” -Wikipedia. You can also see that the GE9X surpassed the GE90 and broke its record on GE Aviation’s KZbin page too. It generated 134,300lbs of thrust, surpassing the GE90-115B’s 127,900lbs of thrust. The GE9X’s might be set lower to 105,000lbs of thrust on the 777x for efficiency purposes though I’m not sure if Boeing did it.
@swissaviation4 ай бұрын
@@user-yt198The GE9X thrust literally broke the Guinness World Record in 2017 which was previously held by the GE90.
@Shytot-15 ай бұрын
Has anyone told RR?
@asawarijoshi70095 ай бұрын
5:45 Wait What the hell that GE9X is doing with the CFMs😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@Sqwizar4 ай бұрын
SAA 🇿🇦
@isokabooks37583 ай бұрын
Never mind the engine what about the Boeing?
@UUwUU803 ай бұрын
If it’s a Boeing I ain’t going.
@o.c.g.m94265 ай бұрын
Whete looking at retirement technology. Meaning its technology that will affect me personally when I'm at retirement age and I'm 41 😂
@6400az5 ай бұрын
" Resulting in premature deterioration of components " ....In other words, the whole collection of nuts and bolts came apart and the shit broke 7:37
@atziazas4 ай бұрын
Did he say smegma?
@leopardtiger10223 ай бұрын
Repeating same stuff., Pease tell us technical innovations and how they work on the he engine.
@siriosstar47895 ай бұрын
so will it "revolutionize " the cost of flying for the passenger ? Noooo
@petercooper77115 ай бұрын
Years late, lots of problems and nothing yet delivered. Meanwhile RR and Airbus can’t make A350s fast enough. GE advantage if it ever happens could be overtaken by the RR ultra fan.
@_.twixxx4 ай бұрын
ultrafan might take the advantage once it’s completed and tested, but what manufacturer will put it on a plane? i mean boeing could put it on the 777x, but i don’t think airbus will be able to put it on the a350.
@artrandy4 ай бұрын
@@_.twixxx The UltraFan is a test bed only, with new tech already transferring from it to the Trents. News is however, that 2 other testbed UFs are being developed, both of different and smaller sizes, as this engine is scaleable. What could RR possibly want with a smaller version??🙂🙂..........
@_.twixxx4 ай бұрын
@@artrandy maybe an a350 or a380 neo, but i was referring to the original size of the ultrafan due to how massive it was. that original engine could definitely fit in the 777x, but not the a350.
@artrandy4 ай бұрын
@@_.twixxx You're missing the point entirely. UltraFan is a test bed only, (how can I make this point more clear😀😀?) RR have no ambition for UltraFan to power a commercial airliner in passenger service. Neither an A380 nor an A350. However, developments from UltraFan could develop into a new engine, which presumably is why its being scaled down. Think narrow bodies, buddy..............
@_.twixxx4 ай бұрын
@@artrandy well i did do an educated guess. didn’t think narrowbodies tho. smaller and more improved new engines that rr could or definitely will make could definitely hit in the a320 neo family market or boeing’s 797, which should be the 757’s replacement i presume, or boeings new 737 replacement.
@hakantorstensson8053Ай бұрын
A bragging video. The "ground breaking" engine does not have a gearbox beeetween the LP turbine and the fan. The RR Ultrafan concept is ahead of GE90EX in my opinion.
@globanxiety2 ай бұрын
give it airbus, they do it better
@ChicagoRob2Ай бұрын
Bullshit - Airbus doesn’t make jet engines.
@DougEnglish-x6m2 ай бұрын
Will it power the A380 with the fuel efficiency needed to put the A380 back into production? We need the A380 because Boeing has committed corporate suicide thats will take decades to recover from if possible.
@User00000000000000049 күн бұрын
"but first, what is the story behind the GE neen-ecks engine." Stupid AI narration. What a worthless garbage video. It's like it doesn't even exist.
@ノブゾウ5 ай бұрын
IH(aitch)I です。
@Wafflesforbrekies3 ай бұрын
I bet if Elon wanted to make these types of engines ,GE would be a fucking joke.
@Robocop-qe7le17 күн бұрын
plastic blades instead of titanium blades? hmmmm...thanks but no thanks
@dikoman5165 ай бұрын
Blah blah blah
@tvsettv3 ай бұрын
The engines are good, but aircraft is not. Boeing failed
@autofocus2113 ай бұрын
Then go and u make an aircraft 😬 if u can
@tvsettv3 ай бұрын
@@autofocus211 Airbas will do. They know how. Boeing needs total replenishment all managers and engineers, involved in wrong decisions must be fired