The New Hunt for Dark Matter

[@thanosAIAS]

It's really touching, how scientists spend decades from their lives searching for one thing at a time to get us forward! Every scientist steps into the shoulders of previous hard working individuals who paved the way so far!!! AND that is AMAZING!!!!

[@iamrazor9831]

ikr Imagine working on something your whole life not knowing if you'll be able to see the end result. It must be really scary

[@cohenpeyton3080]

instaBlaster

[@Andrew-rc3vh]

It's the thing no one thinks of. The blue LED took a long time to invent because everybody thought a blue LED would be made from a material that did not work as a blue LED. Then someone without PhD dared to think differently and he found it. Before he found it no one turned up to his lectures and mocked him for being underqualified. After that someone stole his idea and made billions. He then sued them and won. Now he tells jokes.

[@blameyourself4489]

That guy loves his job. Great to see!

[@Moonchild1607]

0:01 "Dark matter is something we do not know what it is.." Wow... this documentary ended quickly! :P

[@MihailBFC]

lol

[@awaisraad]

That's science - trying to know what you don't know and if you don't know this, you really weren't needed to watch this video.

[@Disspearing]

Raad Mo neither were you, also he made a joke.

[@Moonchild1607]

@

[@collybeans586]

lol

[@Backbeardjack99]

4:44 no you weren't too technical there, please more of that. We, the people who watch this kind of shows, know enough to be able to follow you, to some extent, so please give us the most knowledge possible ^^

[@TheARN44]

It annoys the crap out of me when I see science documentaries with no technical talk. I want to know how they are doing things and how it works, I don't watch science videos for the music and camera angles.

[@jonespumppu]

Exactly.we have enough "popularized" science shows for people with less than high school physics understanding. Educated adults want to learn new things also!

[@immortalsofar5314]

She made a bigger deal about the damned ice cream than the technology. I mean, *WHY* was that even in there?

[@jaridwilliams739]

bruh preach i stopped watching science docs bc it wasn’t technical enough

[@RJL738]

If Dark Matter is made of a particle, say WIMPs or some other particles how big would these particles be in diameter?

[@BaliAgha]

I need to see more of this man, he’s brilliant!

[@solidsinek14]

Valentino rossi became a scientist?

[@Coxy002605]

Well, he is "The Doctor" after all.

[@cubertmiso]

You need to drive really tight corners to get down there.

[@thisismagacountry1318]

I found dark matter this morning after 3 coffees and a bran muffin

[@B33T33W]

Me too I also learned a bit about fluid dynamics and biological pressure

[@SueMead]

"[ ] the more questions you answer, the more questions will pop (in) to your mind. This should not scare anybody because this is ahh, the fun in it." A phrase such as this should be said to children in classrooms. That questions are good. That to have an inquiring mind is to be encouraged. Even when we don't like the questions being asked, to stifle curiosity is truly immoral. More than so many other things that the superstitious claim as such. Great episode.

[@x_z_z_x]

" Maybe i went too technical there " Damn that was funny

[@BaliAgha]

6:50 is deep thought, so deep that I listen to this video over and over again. It's the sense of understanding that I think most people dont understand and are almost scared to think about.

[@BaliAgha]

3 years later, I still am here wondering why of the why of the why. We have the chance, the opportunity, to continue this journey, so lets continue it together.

[@niiidar]

As an experimental particle physicist I find the comments section on this video both funny and depressing.

[@lyledeyounges1276]

...sort out your emotions.

[@Joylevinstein]

Not a physicist by any rate but like to dabble a bit, especilly in the newest findings in quantum theory so I also find the skepticism and close-mindedness pretty unnecessarying. Not that I care too much though, as Tesla said, all that was great in the past was ridiculed.

[@TheRealFallingFist]

You are a 14 year old boy who's watched Kurzgesagt instead of making friends like a normal kid. You're not an experimental particle physicist if you find the need to actually make a KZbin comment about anything. You feel like your input is actually making a difference, like the fact that your two cents on the overall stupidity of the comment section is appreciated by anyone, but if you were clever enough to actually be an educated physicist you would realize that your input here means less than a shitstain. Fuck you. "As an experimental comment critique, I find the comments section on this video both funny and depressing". See how the fact that I prefaced the comment by establishing a useless, imaginary fact about myself that cannot be proved, didn't actually improve the quality of the comment? Or change the overall meaning of it?

[@madmax07ish]

Falling Bad day, I take it?

[@timmyturner6575]

Falling I quote your comment back at you for your comment. GG scrub you lost your own argument with your argument.

[@Arthurboy777]

I am so grateful for these people devoting their lives for science and discovery

[@JasonJason210]

Personally, I think it's just great that billions and billions are spent on projects like this and CERN just to advance our knowledge! That's one of the wonderful things about humans and the thing that gives me hope about our species.

[@Erodius]

this man is amazing as this channel

[@mrspanky369]

GELATO !!!!

[@DinoNucci]

I've had my fill of "we don't know yet" dark matter vids. It's time to move on until there's a new find imo.

[@toddsfinsdotsurf]

I agree, we're probably going to look back at this era and think, "How the fuck did almost the entire community of astro-physics professionals follow each other into that dead end?"

[@pwnmeisterage]

@@toddsfinsdotsurf Dark matter does seem like a clumsy invention to explain why observed physics doesn't seem to all work out properly, not unlike phlogiston from chemistry. But I must admit I'm not a well-versed expert in theoretical physics like most of my internet peers, lol.

[@sanbalestrini]

"Maybe I went too technical there" 😂

[@PaulM1984]

A documentary about eating ice cream and venturing into a cave, and breifely dark matter.

[@filbuildphilippines]

In fundamental areas of knowledge I understand that between discovery and practical use there can be decades if not centuries. If humans ever do confirm the existence of dark matter I wonder how long it would take to turn a discovery of such magnitude into practical use.

[@ankocooks]

This is the italian Sheldon Cooper. Respect ^^

[@pr1zrak576]

This guy's accent makes science more mysterious, and interesting. If all scientists had an Italian/ foreign language people would surely be more interested in it :P

[@BootyWarrior80892]

Igor Vainer aren’t all accents foreign to other people who aren’t from the region that has that particular accent?

[@pr1zrak576]

I suppose if you were from that region, his accent wouldn't be so much foreign to you. So yes, I suppose what I should be saying is that all science communities around the world need more foreigners at their facilities that are outside of their predominant language sphere. More diversity Yey!

[@howardbaxter2514]

The Italian accent is way better than the British accents.

[@3dge--runner]

i really dug that dude.

[@cubertmiso]

5:26 @ URL to this pic? Fascinating. Please Motherboard, show the images like these. Then those who want to can pause the video for a while. Did not find the picture from your website piece either.

[@Jason-gt2kx]

Novel Dark Matter Hypothesis: DM is simply unaccounted for gravity. GR states that gravity is the consequence of the curvature of space-time. Is it possible that the structure of space-time itself could be warped without the presence of mass? Space-time has been shown to react like a fabric by warping, twisting, and propagating independently of mass, and all have been proven with observations from gravitational lensing, frame dragging, and now gravitational waves! Fabrics can be stretched, pressured, and/or heated to the point of causing a deformation. All of these conditions were extreme during inflation, so it is plausible that the “fabric” of space-time analog could extend having its elastic property have hit a yield point. Therefore, if gravity is the consequence of the warping of space-time, and fabrics can be permanently overstretched, then those empty warped geodesics would create gravitational wells independent of mass. My hypothesis of DM is subatomic black hole imprints of quantum fluctuations that popped in at the moment of inflation. These would be clouds of quantum sized floating fixed geodesics, so they couldn’t expand or evaporate. Perhaps nothing has been detected because there is nothing to detect, and GR wouldn’t require modification of mass interactions because DM would just be an extension of how space-time behaves at extreme conditions. No WIMPS, no MOND, no parallel universes, just space-time imprints to help jump start the galaxy accretion process.

[@deeprecce9852]

This is one good epitome of a great physicist/ scientists...👍👍

[@arjuna5696]

Good luck with the SABRE!!

[@fryncyaryorvjink2140]

So theres dark matter which attracts and can be found with normal matter, and dark energy which repels or stretches spacetime. Can they be the same thing? Empty space expands, squeezing galaxies from every side, making them rotate faster, making it appear that they have more mass than can be seen?

[@darkmoonmining3063]

I love this Italian physics

[@jpelorat]

Love the phrase "Cosmic Silence". Prog rock phrasing material 😄

[@sameeryele]

Whats Episode 1?

[@alirios2241]

This is a clip from a documentary on Netflix about 9 scientists of different backgrounds coming together and sharing their experiences and problems and briefing eachother on their own study. I can't remember the name I think it's The most unknown

[@BlazinAzian007]

I really liked: The most unknown on Netflix. Cool tot see extra footage!

[@ScapeUwa]

I really enjoyed this piece. Great job! What camera did they shoot this on?

[@MartinAston00]

What is that big thing in the thumbnail and @ 0:12 ???

[@johnmenardi2097]

So much respect for that man. Great video. :)

[@adriang.cornejo4800]

Dear Sirs. As reference, the paper where is described a solution of the rotational velocities observed in spiral galaxies, without using dark matter (but adding the Coriolis force in the rotating system, from the General Theory of Relativity), is the following (from 2020): article.sapub.org/10.5923.j.astronomy.20200902.01.html

[@littlerobotfairy9710]

Dark Matter is a really powerful Dark Magic attack. It looks cool, too.

[@calebalbiston8625]

Wow really glad to see someone has it figured out!

[@lonewolfzor]

Hey I saw the full doc , good work motherboard :)

[@TheWiseDrunkard]

Silly question, what's the watch on his wrist? Is it a smartwatch? I'm in the market for a new one since my pebble fried.

[@ahmedmaniyaruni4300]

The dude says at 4:09 that ordinary matter has a small chance of interacting with dark matter how do we know that? I mean we know it interacts gravitationally but detecting gravitational attraction isn't a small thing isn't it?

[@pav9978]

sooo, we are constantly bombarded by DM, ok , and we build a detecor to find it, sounds resonable. But the part that i dont understand is this, how do you build a detector for something that is omnipresent ? the best comparison would be like building a waterdetector under water. Did i miss something ?

[@stir_stick]

Good Lord that place is beautiful

[@charlesbrightman4237]

Revised TOE: 3/25/2017a. My Current TOE: THE SETUP: 1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism. 2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.). 3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them. 4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them. 5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them. FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO: 6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field. 7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field. 8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality. 9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons. 10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary. 11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks. 12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do. THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA: 13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc. 14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe. 15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe. 16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate. 17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure. 18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons). THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY: 19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up. 20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency. 21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies. NOTES: 22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well. 25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true. 26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught? DISCLAIMER: 27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty. ______________________________________________________________________________________ Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way. a. Imagine a 12 hour clock. b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions. c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions. (The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.) d. Shoot a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields. e. Do this with the em fields on and off. (The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results.) f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects. (Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.) (An alternative to the above would be to shoot 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.) 'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done. 'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward.

[@e4r281]

TL;DR; What was that all about ?

[@devrim-oguz]

The experiment you suggest is actually doable. What strength of magnetic and electric fields do you think is necessary ?

[@devrim-oguz]

You say the like charged protons would stick inside the electrons' magnetic field, but you can actually strip the nucleus from an atom and it still holds together. How would that be possible?

[@charlesbrightman4237]

Ali Devrim OGUZ Strength of magnetic and electric fields. I would think that ideally one would want to equally match the energy strengths of all the energy fields involved for optimal results. Hence also though, the alternatives of utilizing 3 lasers or a single laser split into 3 beams to achieve the desired setup. As far as striping a nucleus from an atom and still hold it together. a. CERN utilizes protons in the collider. A proton is just an ionized hydrogen atom, (a hydrogen atom without it's electron), the proton being the nucleus of that hydrogen atom. b. I would think 'if' the theory is true (and I fully acknowledge the 'if' at this time), then it might be possible to combine 2 ionized hydrogen protons inside a 'nucleus' "IF" a magnetic field was of sufficient strength to hold them together. Normally, this would be done by the moving electron with it's moving associated magnetic field. c. Consider also though that an alpha particle is basically a helium nucleus without any electrons. The neutrons would also most probably have some sort of magnetic field associated with them (even though they are considered to be zero charged particles), here again though, keeping in mind that the 'gem' photon would be making up everything in existence. The 'gem' photon having a gravitational component, an electrical component, and a magnetic component. The net effect of the interacting 'gem' photons gives the indications observed. At least that is the current theory I am working off of.

[@charlesbrightman4237]

Ali Devrim OGUZ Here is a copy and paste of the math I have so far for the TOE idea: The mathematics for the TOE doesn't even exist yet as far as I am currently aware. It goes beyond any quantum field theory formulas that I am currently aware of. The outline though is basically as follows: The formula has at least 3 levels to it: 1. The Internal Photon Level: The 3 interacting forces, (which might even be just a singular force with 3 different modalities), all interacting at basically 90 degrees to each other and all simultaneously pulsating and swirling. A complex part of the formula but I believe to be totally doable. 2. The External Photon Level: For each pulsating, swirling photon, all the pulsating, swirling photons interacting with it. An exponential part of the formula that I am not even sure modern day super computers could adequately handle. 3. The Inter-dimensional Photon Level: For each modality within each photon would have an energy frequency associated with it. The energy frequencies could be seen as being in their own space time dimension. (For me, 'space' is energy itself of which is the 'gem' photon and 'time' is the flow of energy; 'temperature' is the interaction of energy), so one would be dealing with way more than just 3 spatial dimensions and way more than just 1 time dimension (as there would many different energy frequencies with many different flows of energy). Whenever like resonate energy frequencies resonated with each other, they would affect each other, kind of like 'spooky action at a distance'. Anytime energy frequencies overlapped, there would be a temporary spike of some sort in each space time dimension. In addition, if in reality the 'gem' photon is just a singular force with 3 different modalities, it's possible that energy could 'slip' between modalities which would also affect the results. A very complex part of the formula on top of all the complexity that came before it. 4. Any time any energy moved in the system, the entire formula would have to be recalculated due to potential ripple effects. Like I said above, I don't even believe the mathematics exists yet for what I am trying to do, but at a minimum, the formula would contain the above levels the way I currently see it to be. ______________________________________________________________________________ 'IF' my latest TOE idea is really true, (and I fully acknowledge the 'if' at this time), that the pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe, and what is called 'gravity' is a part of what is currently recognized as the 'em' photon, then the oscillation of these 3 interacting modalities of the energy unit would be as follows: Gravity: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction; Electrical: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction; Magnetic: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction. Then: 1 singular energy unit, with 3 different modalities, with 6 maximum most reactive positions, with 9 total basic reactive positions (neutrals included). Hence 1, 3, 6, 9 being very prominent numbers in this universe and why mathematics even works in this universe. In addition, it's also probably why there are things like 6 quarks, 6 neutrinos, etc.

[@MrZhballer]

I have a theory on what dark matter is and it's pretty far out but hopefully the next huge find of our time. It should determine spacetime and also lead to 4th dimensional math equations. Which I'm working on with a knowledge deficit. I want to come out with my findings but idk if I should without more math... should I or should I not?

[@vanighte9380]

6:32 well, that totally contridicts the title

[@dudeskidaddy]

Would have liked an explanation of that graph

[@sazzadhossain132]

Eating Gelatto in ITALY IS Really INCOMPERABLE :D The true invisible bliss :D

[@jedi.knight5859]

Love this series

[@sanjuansteve]

I guess that photon particles (and electrons, and perhaps every particle) are in orbit with dark matter particles pulling them into polarizable axial or helical apparent wave packets as they travel depending on the orientation of their orbit.

[@chdrums9]

what keeps him going is that Nobel Prize on the line

[@aswad7368]

Truly amazing, loved his motivation :)

[@fslurrehman]

Dark matter could be somewhere around dirac sea possibly around Majorana fermion.

[@TheTrainstation]

So...no change since I read about it in the BBC Focus magazine in 98

[@lomba1974]

Beautiful!!!! thanks for this video!!!!

[@mrchangcooler]

I wonder if the idea of dark matter will end up like the idea of the aether in the next couple of decades.

[@ScienceByMike]

Cosmic Silence sounds like the name of a band I would love to listen too.

[@keepitsimple003]

Here's the concentrated dark matter recipe. Two parts Plutonic Quarks, one part Cesium, and a bottle of water

[@KittySYT]

Hey guys, my Intel Z87-M Plus *Motherboard* isn't working properly. Can you fix it? :'(

[@MrGAMERSVID]

There are so many people who are excited for the advancement of humanity the future and the technology that may potentially come our way yet do nothing to help.

[@spaggard]

all interviews should be done with everyone involved eating ice cream cones

[@iamwhatiam1221]

i feel i have watched it already. but i remember it starting with the lady driving first to meet the guy....i guess it was some other video...but i remember as its all same from the point they drive to go to his lab to see his machine....damn i have to eat Modigliani again...

[@Mavinski1]

Dark matter is a supersolid that fills 'empty' space, strongly interacts with ordinary matter and is displaced by ordinary matter. What is referred to geometrically as curved spacetime physically exists in nature as the state of displacement of the supersolid dark matter. The state of displacement of the supersolid dark matter is gravity. The supersolid dark matter displaced by a galaxy pushes back, causing the stars in the outer arms of the galaxy to orbit the galactic center at the rate in which they do. Displaced dark matter is curved spacetime.

[@Scynthius137]

If feels like we are assuming that there is only one form of dark matter. What if there are seven forms of matter, all of which are dark to each other?

[@_BhagavadGita]

Dark matter is everyone's missing socks, Nobel Prize please.

[@epicscreenname989]

That microbiologist was trying to flirt with him and he was like hmmm....nah.

[@Victor-zg8kq]

Dark matter, ok... wait, why are we on an ice cream date?

[@asdfadfafsdfa]

How do you detect the constant without first removing the constant

[@newspeed8000]

+Fillium , just remove its surrounding!

[@ErdbeermarmeladeTom]

how to stay on "right" track when we don't know what we are looking for (the "dark matter")? or how to find "some" clues helping us to follow the path, to know what we should do

[@fatworksfoods]

Was so hoping to see a labradoodle at 3:57.

[@deletevil]

I am very fascinated by dark matter but can anyone explain a little bit that how we can ever be able to find something that doesn't even interact with ordinary matter, I mean the instruments we are using are made of ordinary matter, we are made of ordinary matter, right?

[@deletevil]

@Aghilas, ah thanks for the insight.

[@trickydicky2594]

Particles are theoretical. There is strong evidence that they exist because of the gravitational attractions in galaxies that doesn't seem like there's anything there; missing mass. Dark matter is most likely a particle since particles can't actually be detected, only their interactions can.

[@topline2554]

@4:01 The disappointment. Size does matter!

[@alekseysoldatenkov5675]

It's never "too technical" :D :D :D

[@pali1H]

Get this man a job on the Ferrari F1 team.

[@RJL738]

If Dark Matter is made of a particle, say WIMPs or some other particles how big would these particles be?

[@coopermar6911]

They did this because the two were already together for another documentary. The documentary is on Netflix btw.

[@coopermar6911]

Side note, I think parts of this video were taken from the other documentary.

[@Cpt_Wolf]

The New Hunt for Dark Matter - Openning Door to Abyss

[@Techischannel]

Dark Matter is just diffirent undiscloded types of Matter, same with Dark Energy. Its just a big Mix of diffirent Energy Forms and kinds you have yet to disclose. It is totaly correcty to say that this Mix is Dark as if you follow the Chromatic Physics line, if you combine all colors you get Black out of it.

[@ed-edd-n-eddy]

Best of luck to you, you mad scientist 😊

[@IIrandhandleII]

Could it be particles that haven't condensed yet into gas and clouds?

[@sporkeh90]

Not technical enough! Thanks for that :)

[@sunrise.hearts6768]

What happens before that light? Cause of light?

[@mhc4124]

"There is no dark matter there and we are hunting ghosts." I see.

[@Luper1billion]

every time we edge out a fact about reality, we gain more and more guarantees about whats going to happen when we do something. gaining experimental knowledge of aerodynamics for instance allowed us to be so bold as to make a 747. because we can guarantee that that thing isnt going to fall out of the sky for no reason. we know that through edging out reality. the state of the art of edging out reality is at "what is this dark matter?" if we can make some stated facts that will be guaranteed to be true, then that will give us yet another edge that we can build upon

[@masontyler479]

I'm just saying after that ice cream scene they went and did the bang bang.

[@yurizahkeav01]

@Motherboard would this be on mars underneath the surface ?

[@jaylu7971]

if there is light, there is darkness. if there are positive there is negative. everything has its own defined opposites.

[@robertyoung8871]

Look into the santelli binocular telescope....it can see dark matters he calls "entities"... It's interesting to say the least

[@youtubeoneverything4581]

Was the decision to use same font for the title as THE DARK KNIGHT" intentional ?

[@trickydicky2594]

cool vid.

[@wallysalman2260]

What if you can harness it?

[@LifewithChance8800]

I want to get a tour of these labs

[@a.aljohani3657]

meatball-e

[@rosbiffy]

If you’ve seen one Dark Matter vid you’ve seen them all. The universe is being held together by a force we cannot yet explain because there’s 7 times more gravity than there should be. Dark Matter is a placeholder concept. It doesn’t actually exist. There must be something there to generate all that missing gravity which after years of research has yet to be detected. Wouldn’t Dark Gravity be a better name?

[@puredruid]

Maybe dark matter is matter from a parallel universe colliding with ours?

[@Merlin_YouTube]

Humans cannot see in 4d we are limited to seeing only the 3rd dimension. I have a suspicion this may be an important detail to finding the secrets

[@marshallmartin1689]

A thin veil between here and there

[@Diego_Xander]

that sensor sounds very similar to a (radiation) scintillation crystal

[@GamerzzGoat]

That man loves his icecream