The ONLY 3 AI Tools You NEED to Review Literature - I Tested Them All!

[@happypaws-g1r]

hi aynur. what u think about the Ryne ai humanizer? Everyone is talking about it in my university in toronto. I want to buy a subscription but if you could make a comment or video abt it pls. everyone is looking for its video but there is not much video about it. Thanks

[@aynur.science]

Hi! I’ve actually never tried it before. Let me give it a try. :)

[@DanishAli-oi7ej]

I appreciate your efforts and honest opinions about the latest tools and methodologies for literature reviews. This video helped me a lot with my paper writeup in a very short span of time.

[@aynur.science]

Glad it was helpful!

[@melissamujevic]

Great video! I already knew about Scispace and love using it, can't wait to try out the other ones 😌

[@aynur.science]

Hope you like it!

[@BK-dx3cp]

Great work, straight to the point content!

[@aynur.science]

Thank you! 😊

[@salehabuzir5642]

Thanks a lot! Very useful for my phd journey!

[@aynur.science]

You are welcome!

[@ahmedmohsen6838]

Thank you, informating content and by the way your decency is beautiful.

[@aynur.science]

Thank you! :)

[@fazlayelahi29]

I am an undergraduate student from Bangladesh. Thank You so much Miss for this video...!!

[@aynur.science]

You are most welcome! 🤗

[@picturehackc297]

Thank you Aynur abla, greetings from Berlin.

[@aynur.science]

My pleasure! 😇

[@saraghalayini81]

Thank you aynur! very useful

[@aynur.science]

Glad it was helpful!

[@akbarboghani1]

very informative. Thank you for sharing.

[@aynur.science]

Glad it was helpful!

[@AsanEmirsaleh]

The tools mentioned are very useful. I have an experience with only Research Rabbit. It has a weak side - some bibliography metadata are incorrect, particularly it might duplicate some author entries while transferring to Zotero. The latter tools seem to be promising but I have not used them yet.

[@aynur.science]

Thanks for sharing! 😊

[@Farid_g96]

Thank you

[@usmanshahid6557]

Keep up the good work dear Aynur. Can you suggest some good paraphrasing tools (Paraphrased content shouldn't be AI detected)?

[@aynur.science]

Thank you! I prefer PaperPal for academic writing and the AI detectors aren’t reliable. They mark non AI generated text also as AI generated. So I wouldn’t rely 100% on them. :)

[@pharmaNutshell.]

Thank you so much 🌺🌺🌺it is our pleasure to watch and subscribe in your amazing video.🌺🌺🌺

[@aynur.science]

Thank you too! 😊😊

[@mohamedelsaeed9959]

really amazing keep going

[@aynur.science]

Thank you! 😊

[@Joseph-nw3gw]

You earned a subscriber fro Kenya. go...go...gal

[@aynur.science]

Thank youu 🤗

[@alim.6941]

Thank you!

[@aynur.science]

You're welcome!

[@icosmomiller6861]

Thanks so much❤

[@aynur.science]

You’re very welcome! 😊

[@PotheekAami]

What would be the difference between Scispace and Elicit? Is Lens free?

[@aynur.science]

SciSpace creates the same literature review table like Elicit, but has many more other functions that Elicit does not have. First example, SciSpace does Paraphrasing, citations, explaining single papers to you, academic writing, too. So Scispace has more features than elicit. Lens.org is free. It has a paid version too, but I don’t know what it’s for. I always use the free version and I never needed the paid version

[@Hatesofties]

Thank you❤

[@aynur.science]

You're welcome 😊

[@hewramanwaran6444]

Thanks a lot.

[@aynur.science]

Most welcome!🤗

[@NazmulHasan-j7t3b]

❤

[@xoxixox]

Allah Razı olsun Hocam 😇

[@aynur.science]

Rica ederim. 😊

[@mahdial-quran8832]

Try this sister you gonna thank me. NotebookLM

[@aynur.science]

Will do! Thanks 😊