The Parisian Chronicles: Brian Madden's Story of Tech, Travel, and Transformation

[@BrianMaddenFrance]

Thanks for the invite Elias! It's always fun chatting with you about where things are going, and agreeing that the only thing we both know for sure is that we will be wrong about AI. 🤣

[@ekhnaser]

:) we most definitely will be … I enjoyed it too and I look forward to tracking your new adventure! Best of luck to you!

[@patricksquires77]

Today - I think AI would be best if it could be your assistant, your team assistant, your org assistant. Example - Your team assistant is familiar and trained best with your team’s P&Ps, it in takes the team email inbox, assists with deadlines and familiar with the teams forms & reports and answer to the teams own internal jargon. It is less of a full augmentation but more an extension of the team and is helpful, does not forget stuff, very malleable to the teams needs. Just makes working in the team easier - it knows the formatting and dialect of the team’s usual external communication. It understands a visual programing process like a lego mindstorm. I feel like any full augmentation is likely just going to require too much policing and be too clunky once layering in all of the corporate controls and end up being too inflexible. Seems just assisting the team to be more productive and take on the loathes work of a team would be more output right now than to think of it as opportunity of full augmentation today.