The Photography TRAP you MUST AVOID!

[@ian_worth]

If you are looking to showcase your work, I highly recommend Squarespace - Head to squarespace.com/ianworth to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain using code IANWORTH

[@ONE35IVE]

The best thing about moving from film to digital is I can buy “old” digital gear cheap and be blown away by the fact I can set ISO to auto.

[@russhawker1718]

Been using old micro 4/3 bodies since 2012. Almost no investment, lenses are dirty cheap too. Then 2022 decided my photography needed a shot in the arm and invested in a Sony A7III plus two lenses. For me it was eye watering amounts of money and proved to be a complete waste. Photos were still crap, all be it with slightly less noise but a bit of noise is not important. Hated using my new camera, the lenses were too heavy and I was miserable. Flogged it all and went back to my trusty old Olympus. Fortunately people are falling over themselves to own Sony gear, so no money lost.

[@trishf29]

I did similarly, but in the reverse. Had an Olympus SLR, moved to a Sony a7ii digital, hated the weight of the lenses, so moved back to an Oly, but as a digital SLR. Haven’t looked back since. Couldn’t see much difference between the two when making images. Still have the Sony. Good with LensBaby lenses.

[@bobjohnson9597]

I still have 2 Olympus cameras from 2012 EM5 and EPL5 and the original EPL 1 from 2010 and traveled with them to USA, Canada, Japan, Singapore, Philippines and South Korea with not a single problem in fact the EM5 just got back from a 3 month trip to hot tropical Philippines in their rainy season. I did however just buy my first Nikon the Z50ii and it reminds me of my EM5. The reason was for the unreal autofocus that sticks like Velcro, as my dominant eye is loosing sight and the Nikon is the only camera that satisfies me like the EM5.

[@hansemannluchter643]

I've got 2,500DKR (£275) invested in M4/3. For that money I got a E-P1, a E-M5, a E-PL5, 6 lenses, including the 17 and 45mm 1.7, original 4/3 to M4/3 adapter AND the 4/3 50mm Macro, original M4/3 to OM adaptor, a VF-1, 3 flashes, UV-filters and lens hoods/caps. All slightly used, not abused. That gear fits into a bag that would hold one Nikon DSLR and 3 or 4 lenses...I know because I've still got a D300, for use with my old MF Nikkors..At some point,that might be upgraded to a used D800, if the price is right. Only thing I'm missing is Wi-Fi or Bluetooth. And the old Zuiko MF lenses shine on M4/3. All the bad photos I shoot certainly aren't because of the gear😊

[@Koji-888]

Luv. Luv. Luv. My Olympus M43 bodies + small light lenses.

[@ThePNWRiderWA]

I have used Olympus since the OMD-1. I picked up a 1x at a great price recently. It’s a great body for wildlife. I also have a Sony a 7 v4. It is primarily for video and a specific role.

[@JustAnotherMillenialGuy]

Some of my best work (weddings, corporate headshots, and street photography) the last 6 years was with my Canon 6D Classic + 40mm f/2.8, with subtle editing. I’ll never get rid of it.

[@kevinl1492]

I went on a nighttime photowalk downtown in our city with my camera club last night. I took my 6D and 40mm because I haven't used the 40mm in a while. Some people brought tripods and all of them had zooms. They did't seem familuar with the concept of a pancake lens! I liked shooting the 40mm and the 6D can handle ISO of 12,800. But frankly, it would have been easier shooting on my EOS R to get exposure preview. The 6D will last forever though.

[@JustAnotherMillenialGuy]

@ nice 🙌🏼 I have this new thing I’m doing where I’ll just snap a photo and I have up to 2 seconds to do so. I also have a slow shutter of about 1/100. I do this so the compositions are asymmetrical, candid and some camera shake is introduced. I love the grit of it ♥️ there’s just something inspiring about this camera.

[@0ecka]

I'm still using my good old 40F2.8 on my R5. It's such a nice lens.

[@ronaldmoravec2692]

Fell in love with D3/700 again. Something made me take it out for test photos-12 MP camera. Photoshop has super resolution in ACR /details. This generates a 48 MP picture that looks as good as my Z7 ll.

[@ian_worth]

great point 👍

[@jixxxxer17]

what do you mean by ACR / details ? thanks

[@bbiggs]

@@jixxxxer17Adobe’s super resolution upscaling. It’s available in Lightroom Classic and Adobe Camera Raw (ACR).

[@jharrelphoto]

@@jixxxxer17adobe camera raw, and under the editing side menu (the detail tab) has this feature.

[@devonstable9913]

Yep. I still use my Olympus E-PL1, E-P5 and OM-D E-M5 plus a red Panasonic GF1 and a wide variety of lenses both native and adapted. Oh and a mint Panasonic G3, nice and light and with good performance in a modest coat.

[@CarlKoop]

The second set is the one that appeals most to me. I like the fact that its not just the color and makeup of the rocks, but the shapes created by erosion that are highlighted. I live in the desert southwest of the USA and rock formations are a never ending source of photo opportunities (and challenges!).

[@geoffreystone1598]

A Ferrari doesn’t go faster in a traffic jam. No one asks what oven Gordon Ramsey uses?

[@ian_worth]

I'm curious to know what oven he uses now you mention it. haha

[@IamWoollySheep]

Me as well! What oven does he use?

[@TimSeraphiel]

He uses a Smeg.

[@maxtroy]

This little interaction amused me indeed.

[@leewilliams1008]

ha love it - so true!

[@DarfBleeder]

Obviously don't know if you've settled on a carry-camera yet, but a few months ago I 'found' my 12-year old 14.1MP Canon SX210 IS 14x optical zoom in the back of a drawer; thought 'What the heck' and it's wonderful! Image-stabilised, as light as a feather and if you download the CHDK hack for the SX210 it'll take RAW too (along with every other feature a CHDK download adds to your Canon)... And today a decent one's only a couple of hundred quid used...

[@malcolmgibbs5826]

Hi Ian, the first set of 3 shots works for me. I liked the contrast of the rocks with the dark shingle and I could definately see them as a set of 3 square crops in a single frame. By the way, get yourself a little OM5 with the 8-25mm (16-50) f4 lens. Great combo for the sort of stuff you do and no need to carry a tripod.

[@BrianLesliePerry]

l love people upgrading to the latest tech....It means l can buy some great ''As New'' camera and lenses a lot cheaper....

[@ian_worth]

I'm always keen to buy used, where possible 👍

[@Koji-888]

For me it’s comfort. Olympus E-M5iii and a handful of small light lenses. I’ll make it work somehow 💁🏻‍♀️

[@Lepewhi]

I recently did the same thing. I'd been wanting a Panasonic g9. But at the pricepoint, couldn't justify it. The G9ii came out and everyone was ditching the old for the new. I snapped up à mint condition g9 for 600€. Had less than 4k actuations. Came in original box. I'm à happy camper.

[@ChrisM541]

Fantastic advice Ian, thanks for this. Subbed. All three of your triptych sets are stunning. For my personal preference, I can't choose between the first two sets (probably because my simple brain sees them as more 'similar' than the third set). If I'm correct, that 90 degree rotated multi bed layer geology your showing at 07:49 tells a truly remarkable story (I'm thinking Siccar Point/Hutton's Unconformity). I have an old mk1 Canon 7D (hobby photographer only) and am only months away from retiring. I've loved playing and learning with it alongside improving my software editing skills on my PC. It's still a very good camera, and while I could replace it, my sensible head is telling me to stick with it because...it's still a very good camera. Your mention of GAS brought a smile to my face. For almost 30 years, as another hobby, I earned some pocket money as a guitarist in several bands over the years playing social clubs, weddings, functions etc. I knew the pitfalls of GAS so, early on I purchased two guitar icons - a Fender Stratocaster and a Gibson Les Paul to both ensure I could cover all the sounds, and, fend off future GAS. Unsurprisingly, it certainly worked. Amplifiers and effects was a totally different matter, as I moved from floor 'tap dancing' to switch on/off my pedals, to a full MIDI setup which greatly simplified things. There was a lot of of GAS here, with different pedals/amps/etc promising more and more.

[@stephenroberts7828]

Love your work Ian...your very real

[@ian_worth]

I appreciate that 👍

[@adegamble]

Ian - of the 3 triptychs I think #2 is my favourite. On the subject of the video I think you highlight something interesting about KZbin photographers who need to "keep things fresh" in order to satisfy the algorithms and keep their follower count up. Fuji has had a great run of popularity over recent years, and many KZbinrs have ridden that wave. Having made videos (and published e-guides, etc) about Fuji gear for several years they feel they need new material. That doesn't change how good Fuji kit is. Nor will it of itself make any difference to the quality of the work they produce. But it may well drive more interest in their feeds, which seems to be a major consideration (something which Roman Fox acknowledged in his "leaving Fuji" video). I'm sticking with my XT-3 and hope you carry on making videos with photography at the centre.

[@ian_worth]

Great points, all of which are very valid 👍

[@colingerard7863]

Hi Ian. I got a Lumix GX/85 + 20mm f1.7 as a present from the states six months ago. It is a wonderful little camera, great lens with good resolution (my first time with M43) handy IBIS, and other useable features. I have it in my backpack as an everyday carry (I also recommend the base plate with grip to protect the battery door). As a result I take more pictures and have a lot of fun doing so, which in turn benefits when I shoot with bigger cameras. I cant say if its the right one for you, however, the process of shooting with it is something I recommend very highly. Emily at Micro Four Nerds has a great long term reveiw of this camera. Maarten Heilbron has a very good in depth review of it. The second triptych was gorgeous (love triptychs). Enjoy the rest of your day.

[@van-gabondramblinrose6398]

Set 2 for me. Really love the way you captured the light and shadow on the convolutions of the rock.

[@malcolmgibbs5826]

Hi Ian, I prefer the first set of 3 with the shingle in each one. Your idea of making a set of 3 square crops would definately work in my opinion. I could see those 3 shots in a single frame. I prefer the contrast in the first set with the rock formations and the dark shingle. Keep up the good work. Get yourself an OM5 with the 8-25 f4 lens!

[@gavinderbyshire5535]

Great content, I’ve got a lumix gx7 with a 25-50 and 25mm lens. It’s pocketable and the battery lasts for 120-150 photos. I use it for street & landscape and the images are sharp. Cost me £350 all in, alternative was a Fujifilm X100S.

[@rogersteele9890]

Great topic followed up with equally great gear logic, took a number of years also to realize that our camera cannot find the image, composition or lighting and atmospheric conditions.

[@ian_worth]

So true

[@richardstorier6172]

Hi Ian, the second triptych is my favourite, nice and simple!

[@ian_worth]

Thanks so much 🙏

[@mikebartow9415]

I started with a Nikon D 5500. I soon saw limitations after about a year. I then upgraded to a D 850 . It was so much better with resolution and I became more proficient. Fours years later I switched to a Z9. A better improvement in lowlight photography, much more functionality. During these series of upgrades I did research going to Canon or Sony. I was leaning to Canon but the kicker for me was, Nikon was chosen by NASA. If it’s good enough for them with all their knowledge, it’s good enough for me. Love the video and I like the first set of three better.

[@Mixer000999]

I am still with my D5500, planning to upgrade to Z6III. D5500 is a capable little camera, but yes - very limited. Will be still using it for travel though.

[@ian_worth]

Thanks so much 🙏

[@mrkingdom6683]

Hi Ian, I am also a Fuji user with the X-H1. But I needed a smaller body for my street photography, so I bought the X-T10. Now I'm sure that's a bit old and antique for you but the later versions X-T20,30,40&50 might be a good choice so you can use your current lenses. Andy

[@ofthenearfuture]

That second set of 3 photos was my favourite! But all great images as always. Look forward to seeing which pocketable camera you pick though...

[@K.Falls1]

It seems at that time of day time is so limited, the light seems to move faster at Golden hour, it never last long enough to really enjoy. I wish it lasted longer not only for taking amazing photos but to also just embrace it.

[@themobileman6895]

Hi Ian, thank you for the video. I think the second set of 3 photos was the best 😊

[@yspegel]

Exactly my thought: only upgrade when a new camera comes with features that you really need. Last time I upgraded I went from my old, cheaper model APS-C to a second hand full frame 4years old. No need for the latest, this camera has everything I need, making my hobby so much more enjoyable and I saved money over a new one to spend on a new lens. Sure the newer models had features that would be nice to have but nothing essential for my personal use.

[@billpanuska5775]

I prefer Set 2. Question: Would you ever considered rotating an abstract image to improve the way it works with the other two square images?

[@NJM1948]

Another excellent video Ian...interested in your shortlist for a new EDC camera. What are your top 3 at this stage?

[@russculley3619]

Hi Ian, of the three triptych series you have shown us, I think my preference is No.1. However, all three are pretty amazing. Thank you.

[@mosfear]

Thanks for posting. For me, #2 is the preferred set. Regarding choice for a pocketable go anywhere camera, I have a Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V. As a fellow X-H2 user, I'm also curious to know on what occasions, if any, you find to use the electronic shutter.

[@ian_worth]

Thanks so much 🙏 I tend to use electronic front curtain and mechanical shutter for my landscapes

[@cynthiahughes271]

Lovely images all, Ian. As a set maybe the first. I use a 12 year old DSLR and for a while longed for a upgrade to mirrorless, but I've gotten used to the shutter action and settings on this rig and for what I do it works well. Also, with handy noise reduction and sharpening tools in Lightroom et. al. I've saved myself a lot of money.

[@dennismurray703]

Another highly interesting video set amongst a stunning landscape. I really loved the third tryptich images, somehow the middle shot there beautifully complemented the delicate flowing lines of the side panels. Looking forward to seeing what your new camera will be and the doubtless incredible images you will, like a genie, release from it!

[@ian_worth]

Thanks so much 🙏

[@geoffhoward2171]

Hi Ian, you ask which set we prefer, each has it's own merits, so much so you could quite easily use any three to make your triptych.

[@steveramsay5941]

Another great video…. I like the 3rd set…. A few weeks ago I got the urge to go backward tech from my Fuji gear and bought a Leica M8.2… 10megapixel manual everything and I’m loving it…. found out how amazing a near 20 year old digital camera can be…. Cant see the need to upgrade any of my Fuji gear XT3 and X100v…. interesting how the whole industry is geared to tell me all the must have gear to make my journey more satisfying… when the reality is we are mostly amateur hobby shooters…. you made a good point Ian… one that the camera companies might not agree with.

[@ian_worth]

Thanks so much 🙏

[@RickDecorie]

I much prefer set 2. Have you considered converting them to black and white? I think the textures would lend themselves to that very well.

[@ian_worth]

Thanks, thats a good idea 👍

[@alanworland9478]

Done a similar shoot a while back, then it got dark (as in black!) - that's when I realised I had forgotten a torch! Permanently packed now!

[@ciprianpopica]

I think three years ago I purchased a Canon M50 to make KZbin videos related to the amateur radio hobby 😄. Lately since I decided to return to photography ( landscapes of course ) after many years away... as you can guess, I am using the same camera. If I would "upgrade" from this one, I would probably just buy a used Canon 5D Mark IV. 30mpx is enough for me at the moment. Instead I would invest more in lens. I see more and more now ( using the M50 with an adapter ) that the lens I have are not exactly the best. But as you say, if there is no profit is not really worth upgrading. I think learning how to take better photos using what I already have is the real upgrade. Cheers Ian and good luck finding the little camera. I think I will save a bit for that 5D Mark IV 😄. I do want a full frame just because of the low light issues I have on the little M50.

[@carolinewebb1363]

OM-5 + Panasonic Leica dg vario 12-60 f2.8

[@ian_worth]

that sounds interesting 👍

[@davidligon6088]

Great advice, in another thought provoking video. I am not a professional, but my criteria for investing in gear is that it must allow me to do something I simply cannot do with the gear I have now, that I want/need to do. That is a lot smaller list for landscape than many other genres. I shoot Sony, and upgraded from the NEX to the a6000 when it was released because it felt like a huge shift in shutter delay and frames per second for family and action shots. Now, I’m trying to decide whether to upgrade from the A1 to the A1 II. In all honesty, there are many a6000 landscape compositions that rival my A1. But, there are so many times I’ve wanted pre-capture for wildlife. Don’t get me wrong, I’m feeling more than a little bit lucky and privileged to have the A1. In the end, I’m thinking it is a lot of money for one feature I cannot do with my current body. PLEASE, PLEASE, OH PLEASE, make a video on your process for choosing your compact camera, including your short list. That is an area I’ve been thinking about for a while. Sometimes I think I should just put a pancake lens on my a6000 (which I still use from time to time), and stick that in a big pocket.

[@trevorbrooks813]

Thanks for a really interesting video Ian. I found it hard to choose from the three photos, each has something in its favour. I'd go for number 1 despite the dark patch. Compact and pocketable seem to mean different things to different photographers so it'll be interesting to see where your musings lead you. Thanks again.

[@ian_worth]

Thanks so much 🙏

[@Larry_Odom]

Thanks Ian, I always enjoy your video's, insightful ideas and comments. Put me down for scene 2 !

[@ian_worth]

Thanks so much 🙏

[@joao.s.cardoso]

I have an X-E4 that i really like. I also have the X100V but as a backup camera for my H2 and as a travel camera, I prefer the X-E4. Depending on what I want tot do will take one or 2 lens, usually fixed, and while not really pocketable (unless you have XXL pockets) it serves 2 porpuses in one. If thats too large for you consider the Sony RX100 series. I have the original one, still going with us on holidays. 20mp sensor, really small camera, and from version III onwards it includes an EVF. Cost wyze, my SOny RX100 in second hand costed me 150 euros a few years ago :)

[@SteveBrill]

Another great video Ian. I used to want to "upgrade' gear when I was earning money from photography, but now being retired, I don't chase the latest and greatest. More than happy with the image quality of my XT3 & XPro3. Besides a more expensive camera is not going to improve my eye. What a gorgeous place to shoot seascapes Ian! Do you live in that area of the country?

[@jimharris3889]

In reference to your search for a small every day carry, I also am looking for the same and the Ricoh GR line of cameras is what I'm leaning towards, small and discreet while offering great image quality,, they are not cheap though , but it's something that can fit into a pocket and can be used for city/urban type incognito style shooting

[@michaelt7320]

A great set of images, Ian, especially set 2. I like the abstract nature of the composition and wondered how it would look as a mono. As regards a pocketable camera, the XT30 ii or XM5, with a small zoom or prime lens would be good options, or even a used XT20. Thanks for a great video.

[@ian_worth]

Thanks so buddy 🙏

[@jamiejodyboardman2568]

Had a Sony Alpha 6300 and a Zeiss zoom ..bought a 10 year old Fujifilm XT-1 and compared the Sony 24 MP to the Fuji 16MP and was amazed to see the the Fuji was much sharper and had vibrant color ! That's when I sold my Sony System and started getting Fujifilm lenses..very pleased ...one of the XE Fuji's should be compact enough although I wont purchase a camera that does have a viewfinder... great web sight !!

[@ropeyarn]

The aps-c sensors of ten years ago would have had a hard time capturing those subtle colors. I was going to recommend going full frame until I saw your results with a much newer Fuji. Your pictures reminded me of the significant step-up I took about seven years ago to FF. But you did a great job juggling three cameras, and repeated transitions from a video to still mindset. Your editing skills combined it all into a pleasant experience for us!

[@halflink]

My almost 14 yo Pentax K-5 has very decent dynamic range 🤷‍♀

[@steveh1273]

Enjoyed it Ian. Good gear logic too.

[@ian_worth]

Thanks so much 🙏

[@clarkbarrow6750]

All the photos were great. Nice video.

[@curiousabout1]

The more abstract nature of the second set appealed to me most. Also wanted to comment that I loved the composition of the video at 6:47 , I thought that would have made an interesting photo!

[@ian_worth]

Thanks so much 🙏

[@nevillewatkins4997]

The first tryptic worked for me Ian. Thinking about your dilemma - if you can call it that - one camera springs to mind, and that's the XS20. I don't own one, but theoretically, I think, it should fit the bill. It's quite dinky, with very good battery life and seems like a real shooters camera. It's the sort of camera I could imagine carrying around with me all day, and using for everything. A good flippy screen, with decent video too. The only downsides I can see is that it's not weather sealed and the EVF isn't the best.

[@tomheim9516]

Another great video, Ian! I really liked the 2nd 'tryptic' image. Especially if the highlights on the left side of the 3rd image in that set were to be toned down a bit. It could be KZbin, but the luminosity is a bit high vs the other two. Just my 2 cents. Thanks for all the great content you provide! 🙂

[@rickbaines8262]

My pro gear has been Panny S5 and a couple of Fujis, just been gifted an almost worthless Olympus EM10, just 16mp, blown away by the image quality, there really isn't much difference between any of them below iso 1600 and the MFT lenses are really, really cheap compared to my full frame camera. These days upscaling and noise software balance most stuff out, I'm feeling like I might try out one of the later Olympus bodies in the future

[@ian_worth]

Great points 👍

[@brendallsterling4117]

I always enjoy your videos

[@gregdyer7227]

I have been wanting a pocketable camera for some time now. I have a OM-1 II with a couple of pro lenses and it is working with a peak design capture clip on my belt but it is larger and heavier than what I want for a 2nd camera. I am very interested in seeing what you go with. I have been considering the OM Systems TG-7. INDESTRUCTABLE and fits in my pocket. The video features are holding me back though. Good luck to us both.

[@ian_worth]

Thanks so much 🙏

[@tombridge3608]

Set 1 was the winner for me, the dark sand added to the atmosphere.

[@ian_worth]

Thanks so much 🙏

[@daveberg8782]

Actually, Ian, I rather enjoyed the shot you made shooting into the light. I'm kind of a sucker for shots like your anyway, but I liked that one best today. Looking forward to finding out which compact device you choose. I have some thoughts running through my mind as we plan a trip to Europe in 2026. I will be interested to learn what you chose and the reasons for making your choice.

[@neilbarford2456]

another great video , and I love the terminology used, upgrading your gear might be a downgrade in other areas such as weight, cost, portability, usability , familiarity and even features . I am heavily invested in M43 and have spent many hours viewing FF cameras and lens options , We all like new shiny things , but a new camera will display my rubbish image with more pixels and more dynamic range , making it even worse !. For now I am just going to enjoy my hobby , book some workshops and photo tours .

[@ian_worth]

Thanks buddy, great point 👍

[@TheAndyMaan]

Nice video Ian, I must admit I'm considering shifting to full frame for increased dynamic range over my X-T1 as i do struggle with it in harsher lighting trying not to blow highlights or have too darker shadows, exposure blending isnt always an option. Also becuse im looking at having a mid range zoom on my camera most of the time (16-80mm on Fuji or 24-105mm full frame) as its quite a versatile zoom range i find myself shooting in the majority of the time. The Panasonic s1 im thinking of can be picked up for around the same price as an X-T3 so its only a couple of hundred pound more in the lens between the 16-80 and panasonic 24-105. Its certainly not a decision im going to rush in to though and will be carefully weighing up if its truly worth it or not, theres pros and cons to both. As for your images i loved the 2nd triptych the textures and colours just seemed to match better to me, images like that are quite subjective though.

[@ian_worth]

Thanks so much 🙏

[@shaneweightman]

Thanks for the vid , my good pocket camera I bought last yr was a canon gx7 mk2 really great for the size , cheers shane uk 🇬🇧

[@andrisstanga5938]

Great video and I loved set 2. I am looking forward to seeing what compact pocket camera you choose. As you are with Fuji now, the new E-M5 is probably on your list. But the fact it doesn't have a viewfinder would really bug me. My own camera is a potential pocket camera. I have the Sony a6400 and coupled with a pancake lens it would fit in a coat or jacket pocket. But there's such a range... The micro four thirds of Lumix compact cameras or an Olympus Pen come to mind. Of course, half the world have bought a Rollei GR or Fuji F100... But what I am really looking forward to is seeing you do some videos with these. So often, on KZbin, these compact cameras tend to get used for street photography. Would be great to see a Rollei or whatever compact you end up with being used for something else. Would they even be suitable for landscape?

[@ian_worth]

I'm sure they would, I would like to try them all 😂

[@kencawley3121]

Loved the second set. Would look great mounted on aceall.

[@KPAki1Ler]

When I do photography, I go out with the intention of doing it. I next to never have a camera with me daily because I work full time and have limited time to do the hobby. I buy what I want which will suit me and aid my photography. There are standards I set myself and what gives me satisfaction, may not matter to others and vice versa. Once you have a built a setup, you become settled into that system, until you've done that you can be in constant indecision too. I will say I'm a student of the craft too, I equally soak up knowledge from professionals like Ian Worth here amongst others.

[@mikehill6789]

Get an Olympus EM5 YKIMS ! I’m happy I’m still shooting with my X-T2. Does everything I need

[@ifell3]

I've got a panny gx80/85. Watching another channel he uses an e-m1 mark ii, picked up used seems quite a steal.

[@Revi200x]

I think you shud give Ricoh RG iii is small pocketbele and the image quality is amazing plus you get the option to customize your profile picture with different colours styles like the fujifilm camera 🙌

[@davidskinner274]

My thoughts is a pocketable with RAW, manual options and a viewfinder as well as back screen. In bright light, you just can't see the composition on a screen. Any brand with the above will be fine. If you go Fuji, dials and mens will be familiar.

[@ian_worth]

Thanks buddy 👍

[@TrickyDreams]

Got the Z50 ii for a lightweight camera to have on the go

[@jixxxxer17]

you mention you never had any complaints about the printed images while using a 12mp camera, but what size prints are you talking about ? Great video !

[@davidstevensasidewayslook8831]

just bumped into you channel, I like it....... On the subject of small cameras (I have full frame Nikons as Ive always had) However, a number of years ago I purchased (new) a Sony RX100iii, I just love it, great for street shots and small enough to drop in a trouser pocket, my goto bit of kit I always carry that's better than an iPhone. The quality is exceptional for me......

[@charlesfarnell1127]

Image 2 appeals to me as the strongest of the three. 😊

[@robertgrenader858]

Set 2 is very, very nice. As a Fuji shooter, look on the used market for an X100V or something.

[@ian_worth]

Cheers buddy, check out next weeks video 😉

[@leeRocks568]

At 11;30 the colour of the sky behind U is amazing and beautiful....as U walked away.

[@m.sabir21]

In my experience, a best daily go to camera (a rolls Royce of the cameras) is sony RX 100 mark VII. Compact and pocket size, very sharp images with 28mm to 200mm zoom capability.

[@ian_worth]

yes I've herd good things about that camera 👍

[@MLC48]

Love your videos!

[@ian_worth]

Glad you like them!

[@osvaldoverduzco3900]

You hit the nail on the head. For me at least, if the gear is not earning me any money, there is no point of upgrading. I was happily using an a6000 but to do video jobs, I had to rent a camcorder. Then the a640 came out and, so it made more sense to invest on that camera. I now use the a6700 and ZV-E10 II primarily but I still occasionally need to use also my a6400 and a6100. I don’t do photography or videography regularly but I have done enough to pay for the gear I use.

[@barryhiggott9458]

I love set one it’s everything that I wish that I could create so now a trip to the beach is on the cards although the local magnesian limestone is not so photogenic.

[@DigiDriftZone]

What are you giving up when going from Fuji APS-C? - Sony full frame is smaller, lighter, often cheaper (once you factor in a few third party or second hand lenses). Sony LCDs are not great and you get 6.2k video (if you can stomach the dynamic range hit) on Fuji, but going to Sony, my gear is now smaller, lighter, cheaper and I'm getting substantially better results.

[@ghostofgw7781]

I think we should get out and shoot more than worry about new gear.

[@ian_worth]

very true 👍

[@paulseymour7485]

Great video and super ideas # 2 for me.

[@ian_worth]

Thanks so much 🙏

[@keithdavies7167]

HI Ian some good advice in there where is that beach racking my brains to ID it?

[@cbimage]

I like the way you've managed to compose the rock formations as virtually sizeless.

[@christian.irmler]

Hi Ian, a great video, buddy! I keep it like that: when my gear fulfills its job, there is no reason to upgrade, actually. Just if the new gear would offer advantages that are worth the extra money, I upgrade 😊 Thank you for the video and have a great weekend, Christian

[@christophermason7735]

One of the things I like about APSC is greater depth of field. And some of the extra sensor size is lost if objects in the foreground and you need to stop down

[@danielspenner3683]

Good Argument! I never thought about that.

[@babajaiy8246]

"One of the things I like about APSC is greater depth of field. " That's not true. You're thinking in terms of using the same lens and focal length in both situations.(different sensor sizes). You are able to get the same depth of field with a full frame sensor as you can with an APSC - You just have to use a different combination of lens focal length, aperture and 'distance' shooting from.

[@kevin-parratt-artist]

Depth of field is to do with focal length and aperture, relative format size. It's fully understandable that you are confused because many are, especially when KZbinrs also get it wrong, and talk crap.

[@zardosspinosa6944]

If you buy a Hasselblad X2D 100C Medium Format Mirrorless Camera I assure you are are going to get gorgeous images. And if I had money to burn I would certainly get one. However I am fully invested in Olympus M4/3 and I enjoy the challenge of creating the shot and squeezing out the very best image quality from this much maligned sensor.

[@ian_worth]

Thanks buddy 👍

[@IAmR1ch]

I disagree to some degree, but I think your are right to some degree. In landscape photography, You don't need any of the new features cameras have to offer. Don't upgrade. But I upgraded to the Canon R5 because of superior AF with human and animal eye tracking. If you shoot birds in flight, wide open portrait, moving wildlife or sports, The mirrorless AF is a worth upgrade, but not for landscape. I purchased a used Olympus EM1x for 500 dollars, I purchased a viltrox speed booster for EF lenses. This allowed me to use LiveND and composite. I have a native oly 60mm macro lens that works with focus bracketing and flash. So upgrading allowed me to do some new things without spending a lot of money. So for those who are on a budget and do landscape, it is the least expensive photography, requires no features and can be shot with an old DSLR. But if you have the money, and shoot more demanding subject. A new mirrorless maybe for you. I already had canon glass so, it was just the body for me, but I see the attraction of the Olympus which is a smaller lighter system that has features that allow light painting, live view ND, live view compositing. I think that too is a worthy upgrade for someone who wants to do more than landscape photography.

[@ian_worth]

All very true, well put 👍

[@babajaiy8246]

"The mirrorless AF is a worth upgrade, but not for landscape." I would have to disagree from experience. With some of the camera lens combinations I have....when I shoot(landscape) near pre-dusk or post-dawn and am getting close to low light conditions, the AF starts to get 'wanky'. Meaning many times I actually have to switch over manual focus, and there are the elements to contend with or things like biting bugs to distract....I will miss shots that are just out of focus ever so much. A very good AF helps much and with my type of shooting in landscape, AF is a priority and worthy of upgrading if there is some deficiency like I described.

[@IAmR1ch]

@@babajaiy8246 You must shoot Nikon. Also, don't use 3rd party lenses. Canon does not do that, but if it is too dark or there is not contrast for it to lock onto, Canon has focus peakingi in manual mode it will show when the stars are in focus when shooting astro, . Nothing is perfect but Canon AF is so superior to everything else especially dslr it is not funny.

[@babajaiy8246]

@@IAmR1ch No - I shoot Canon and Sony.

[@BernhardSchwarz-xs8kp]

Tnis video is around since a long time. Nothing new - but actually very informative

[@paultaylorphotography9499]

Buying gear has been a wee obsession of mine since i was a lad now 59 still obsessed. I work full time shooting news sports events weddings concerts everything and anything. For my KZbin channel i use a variety of cameras film and digital and for the record i earn next to bugger all from the channel i do it for fun alone. For the day work im still using 2 x canon 1dx bodies these are incredibly good cameras. I am considering upgrading to the R series for the improved AF and faster frame rate for sport.

[@danielspenner3683]

I Like Triple #2 the best. Very nice video. I can relate to your arguments on gear: I am no pro by any means, so profit is no argument of mine. My threhold to buy new gear is me not making progress anymore because of my old gear. That hasn't happened in a long time. I have startet to lean towards low light photography lately and my sensor is luckily quite good at that. However noise does become an issue once in a while. To counter that I have decided to invest in Topaz Software which I am more than happy with. It's been a much more efficient tool than any new camera might have been.

[@ian_worth]

Very true, software can save us a lot of money 👍

[@richardmarsh6357]

The second set is the best for me. Great video and helpful advice. Am I right in thinking that in many of the recent videos you have been using different camera bags, I've lost count. Is this a secret 'gear fetish' or are you testing them out?

[@Minke63]

My everyday carry is a Fuji X30, which is an absolute gem.

[@Mohika881]

What an amazing place to go for a walk! Where was that?

[@turgs1]

What are you vlogging with

[@mrmaxwell2176]

Great video with superb images, as usual. Thanks. I notice that you seldom if ever use a lens hood, even when shooting into the sun. I use the Fuji 50-140 and would happily leave the slightly awkward hood at home. Are hoods just an unnecessary bit of kit?

[@rickbaines8262]

I'll often just use my hand over part of the lens if I spot any flare, usually does the job.

[@ian_worth]

Depends what you shoot. For landscapes I just use my hand. If I was shooting something fast paced like wildlife, a hood would be very handy.

[@deeweeuavp]

I have a Canon 850D - 4 lenses of varied magnification ... I use my 10-18 EF-S & Sigma 18-300 Macro for telephoto shots aswell Full frame I was looking for a cheap entry - 5D Mark II or a 6D ... Or will I just get a 150 - 600 Sigma Cont Sports for my 850D and leave it at that!

[@johnwright2639]

Set 2 was best for me. Much cleaner

[@komikuno]

Thanks for the tips, Southgate

[@borderlandpeppers]

Absolutly right :) from modern day fuji apsc to full frame is a very small gap.. and if it realy has to be a noticable difference were back to fuji again ;) the choice to have apsc and medium format lineup could be very smart for the future. To Your 3 Series, i like 1 and 2 but 2 a bit more :) If You reeealy think about upgrading then do it in a bigger step, i shot only xh2 and xh2s now got the gfx 100 ii and ooh boy.. That is a crazy difference (reason was big printing) and my own ego 🙈

[@grootbatavia]

From an IQ perspective, I doubt many people would be able to see a difference between DX and FX. That said, the one thing about Fuji files is that they are (to me), slightly harder to work on in post compared to my Nikon RAWs. They work well for B/W though. I have my trusty X-E3 with the 27mm lens in my pocket almost all the time and the simple fact that it is there when an opportunity presents itself means it has taken a large percentage of my favourite images.

[@grootbatavia]

As a full time working photographer, I think there are a few niches where the latest and greatest can make a difference. That said, I sold my D5 and work with a pair of D500's for all my wildlife work. AF is more than adequate and low light capabilities are fine. For all other work, I use a dated Leica SL2-S. It gives me great results with all my MF lenses and it is built like nothing Nikon ever offered me outside my F3 and F6. Most of my work is printed and published and I can honestly say editors often accept a smartphone image or two for smaller prints. Anything from a real camera is fine. My all time favourite camera was my D3, which was my main camera and my back-up for years untill it died. My pcoketable go everywhere camera is a Fuji X-E3, which is by now also "old". Anyway, I think the big producers and youtubers are on a path to grab your money, offering you tech and advances you do not need to take great photos. To a very large extend, I feel that all the modern AI and automation is just there to enable anyone to take a nice photo, even if they have no clue how they did it. There is no substitute for understanding light, camera settings and composition. Rather than invest in a new 4000 dollar camera, I would suggest grabbing a cheap film slr and a stash of B/W film. Work through that, develop it at home, learn from your mistakes and you will be a MUCH better photographer. Just my 2 cents, end of rant.

[@slowdownmovies4474]

Second set is my favourite! Though my fav. photo is the third one from the first set.