1:05 "Anyone could have beaten Jimmy Carter." Except Gerald Ford.
@drakekendall50955 жыл бұрын
He's saying anyone could beat Jimmy Carter in 1980. Gerald Ford barely lost in 1976 because of 3 things: People had a bad taste in their mouths from Nixon, Reagan gave him a heavy primary challenge which divided the conservatives and demoralized Ford supporters, and Ford was viewed as illegitimate since he was 3rd in line to the Presidency aka an unelected President. People quickly realized Jimmy Carter was a big, fat mistake after he was inaugurated. He was never popular.
@0108dylan5 жыл бұрын
That’s not true. Carter was popular for a decent chunk of his term.
@alwillk5 жыл бұрын
@@0108dylan Not at the end.
@mrrogersrabbit5 жыл бұрын
@@drakekendall5095 One more thing: the NY Daily News's "Ford to City: Drop Dead" headline. Ford went on to lose NY by 4%. If that 4% swung the other way, New York would have gone red and cost Carter the election.
@ronniebaker45494 жыл бұрын
He had a 74% approval ratting before Delta Force failed the Hostage rescue mission
@AlternateHistoryHub11 жыл бұрын
It isn't American history, without a jab at the French
@savvapouroullis792711 жыл бұрын
It isn't anyone's history without a jab at the French.
@lukejohns58696 жыл бұрын
AlternateHistoryHub so true
@Keres80966 жыл бұрын
Yet, they were a huge factor in the creation of this country.
@drdejesus216 жыл бұрын
Garrett Baumann This. America arguably would not have won their independence without French naval help.
@yeshualawson6 жыл бұрын
Shawny D and they wouldn't have won theirs in wwI and WWII without our help. 2 to their 1 they still owe us one
@skeltonslay8er7815 жыл бұрын
Reagan’s best moment is when he is giving a speech and hears gun shots and then goes “missed me”
@abhiprakash749994 жыл бұрын
What??? that actually happened ?? Damn that's a cool guy
@alahjandrodagrate16114 жыл бұрын
Abhi Prakash it was a balloon popping, but it sounded like a gunshot during the speech. Still hilarious
@rileyh5204 жыл бұрын
@@abhiprakash74999 yep it happened. It's even better in the context that he survived a previous legitimate assassination attempt
@bothi004 жыл бұрын
In the surgery room following his assassination attempts, he said to the surgeon "I hope you're not democrats" before going under anaesthesia.
@lukeswain14634 жыл бұрын
Nah his best moment was dying
@lurchingdeath26424 жыл бұрын
anyone else here bc your teacher can't find something better to assign you for online classes during coronacation
@masterthaxx16304 жыл бұрын
that would be me
@Joeygbigdog4 жыл бұрын
And Me
@kalechipps4 жыл бұрын
I'm just here so I can understand what the hell my teacher is trying to teach during corona lol
@kalicx19964 жыл бұрын
Yes
@ziscotv30724 жыл бұрын
Me
@squamish42448 жыл бұрын
Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this comment section!
@thatguyoverthere4686 жыл бұрын
Heheh I see what you did there
@browngirlinaclownworld20776 жыл бұрын
Mr. Gorbachev might also want to tear down this video. It kinda breaks my heart how little credit he gets for ending the Cold War. That pudgy bastard was 80% of the reason it ended. With another Brezhnev in office, the Cold War might have gone on to this very day.
@asielmilian385 жыл бұрын
@@browngirlinaclownworld2077 agree. Thank god we had Reagan.
@noice26065 жыл бұрын
😂
@louise-yo7kz5 жыл бұрын
Wow!🙄
@loltshy8 жыл бұрын
is it just me who's watching this series for fun not for AP tests? I'm not even American.
@Sh0cKwavE__8 жыл бұрын
I am, btw I'm an American
@GregTom28 жыл бұрын
That's not too surprising. Americans aren't known to learn for fun.
@Sh0cKwavE__8 жыл бұрын
GregTom2 but, i am watching for fun and im an american whos too lazy to put lines in my words
@chandruae8 жыл бұрын
Oh yes. I'm an Indian (from India) and have watched the entire Crash Course US History series. It's quite fascinating!
@shaywright66088 жыл бұрын
I'm watching it for fun. I love history
@MrBasedgod5108 жыл бұрын
I feel that an analysis of the War on Drugs and its effects on mass incarceration should have also been included in the video.
@davidpatton9068 жыл бұрын
What a stupid idea! This guy is covertly liberal but you want him to be in your face liberal.
@louise-yo7kz5 жыл бұрын
Absolutely
@trpc68945 жыл бұрын
5:45 look very closely at John Greens forehead. A mark emerges at the same time his voodo doll is stabbed. Genius
@guykruger14 жыл бұрын
That was so painful to watch!
@mariyahndiaye13574 жыл бұрын
That freaked me out. Is this clever or sinister🤔
@eva-sue4 жыл бұрын
i saw that and thought i was tripping for like 5 minutes straight
@davidl77438 жыл бұрын
"A lot of reagans policy's weren't popular at the time" *1980 election wins 44 states and 489 electoral votes* *1984 election wins 49 states and 525 electoral votes*
@swaharmaman94107 жыл бұрын
David L a lot not all. You can still win with some policies that are not popular as long as the rest is popular? Reagan won big, really big, but that does not make all his views beling to the majority. Moreover, if 40% oppose a certain view does hot mean 60% is in favour of it, it means that 60% of people are in either in favor or do not care.
@HtineTEE7 жыл бұрын
David L he didn’t win bc of his policies.
@richgrasby52946 жыл бұрын
David L I was hoping somebody would point out that fact. If no one did I was going to.
@RyderSpearmann6 жыл бұрын
@Swahara man That means the emphasis was WRONG. The statement should have been "Most of Reagan's policies were popular at the time, leading to his reelection with even more impressive numbers." Making a technically correct but WRONG statement is just partisan spin. David L. is just illuminating the biases of the presenter for us all to see.
@shahabkhan42786 жыл бұрын
I R A N C O N T R A
@Gusativo8 жыл бұрын
the most shocking part of this video was the "carpeted bathroom". WHY AMERICA?
@jakestockton48088 жыл бұрын
100% true
@alihaleem82648 жыл бұрын
Gustavo Palamone my house was built in 1980 and the floor in the bathroom was carpet before we changed it several years ago.
@Strawberry92fs8 жыл бұрын
I was born in 92 and I remember carpeted bathrooms. Terrible, terrible idea.
@thisisaname55898 жыл бұрын
Because America. Love it or GTFO
@merrittanimation77217 жыл бұрын
THE HORROR
@xdearlifex11 жыл бұрын
John Green is living some sort of Kafka-esque nightmare. He is forced to sit in a white room while lecturing to his younger self about history while occasionally berating him. He is forced to by a mysterious figure named "Stan", who occasionally makes him answer game-show style questions where the only reward is a lack of punishment via this "shock pen". Somebody HELP HIM!
@Teuwntjuh11 жыл бұрын
Someone must have been telling lies about John G., for without having done anything wrong he was arrested one fine morning.
@JLRoberson5 жыл бұрын
please sir no more shocks MORE HISTORY GREEN uh...Mongols? AAAAAA
@Jjb-gk4ce5 жыл бұрын
We don't care about John Green, individuals don't matter after all
@prodwysp4 жыл бұрын
Get your r/woooshes ready everyone
@abhiprakash749994 жыл бұрын
Omg. Underrated comment
@sabrinarosario64997 жыл бұрын
"Keep your bureaucratic hands off my thermostat" LMAO
@platosplatoon68735 жыл бұрын
I'm British... but i'm going to become an AP US history teacher very soon so def feeling the pressure. Thank you John Green.
@drakekendall50955 жыл бұрын
Make sure not to be biased against conservatives! This guy is definitely biased against Reagan.
@gregorymalchuk2724 жыл бұрын
@@drakekendall5095 Reagan flooded the country with Democrat illegal aliens and republicans are about to be made a national minority because of it.
@gregorymalchuk2724 жыл бұрын
@fm'latghor You do know how immigration and demographics works, right?
@garfieldfarkle4 жыл бұрын
@@gregorymalchuk272 Republicans have long been a national minority. In the last 28 years, they have gotten a majority of the vote only once in 7 elections.
@gregorymalchuk2724 жыл бұрын
@@garfieldfarkle That's because of amnesty and democrats flooding the country with immigration. The elections aren't legitimate anymore.
@mustardsfire2211 жыл бұрын
The breakdown John has in the middle of the episode about why he wants us to learn about our history is one of the best moments of any Crash Course episode ever.
@willzjc8 жыл бұрын
"It's never about individuals, it's always about collective hivemind" thanks Comrade
@auDipquid8 жыл бұрын
Good one.
@jeroldproductions63677 жыл бұрын
+Amon Ra To the shadows comrade!
@xpect71147 жыл бұрын
Lmaoo
@rightwinglimbo76866 жыл бұрын
This video is annoying and Commies aren't people.
@keiwolfen6 жыл бұрын
LMao
@SiVlog19894 жыл бұрын
Considering how Reagan was politically in his youth, he did a complete about face. From Democratic leaning, sympathetic to Trades Union and campaigning for people like Harry Truman, to being pro-business, Anti-Union and the darling of Conservatives as Republicans think of him to this day
@alonalkalai95056 жыл бұрын
Trump took Reagan's slogan. "Let's Make America Great Again"
@barneycarparts5 жыл бұрын
Its a good goal.
@telescopicS6275 жыл бұрын
And is coincidentally also a moron. History will not be kind to Boomer clowns.
@obiwanshinobi875 жыл бұрын
More like he ruined Reagan's slogan
@stephenb60165 жыл бұрын
@@telescopicS627 why is the country doing so good then
@telescopicS6275 жыл бұрын
@@stephenb6016 *well. You mean "why is the country doing well". It's not. It's doing just as well as it was under Obama, which is mediocre. Maybe your low standards and psychotic partisanship play a role in this perception? Obsession with stock market too.
@richardunderwood41588 жыл бұрын
Tax cuts are great but only if you cut spending.
@rishantdutt19468 жыл бұрын
Ronald Reagan did.
@richardunderwood41588 жыл бұрын
Rishant Dutt Not enough to balance the budget.
@rhettnewbern26497 жыл бұрын
Richard Underwood you have to think the house and senate were both controlled by the democrats
@antonio41147 жыл бұрын
Hopefully trump cuts spending on things like common core, and SOME military spending. I used to be for more military spending until I found out how much it adds to the debt
@antonio41147 жыл бұрын
damn maybe we really do have a problem here. I heard Bill Clinton reduced the debt, what did he do? Trump should just do that
@jamal207011 жыл бұрын
I moved to the United States two years ago, and your videos are the reason I understand American politics and history!
@tabula_rosa11 жыл бұрын
if you're looking for a career in american politics try a lobotomy
+TheArtunism I should have listened, that hurt my brain.
@velvetrose6108 жыл бұрын
+Alex Marcoe I didn't listen either.... I thought just skimming wouldn't hurt. I was WRONG!!! Don't do it.
@ariana02058 жыл бұрын
+TheArtunism Why didn't I listen? Ugh my eyes burn
@Kat22Kit11 жыл бұрын
Thank you for bring up the de-institutionalization of the mentally ill. This has had drastic effects that linger to this day. American's mental healthcare system is so fraught with holes many people are not getting the help they desperately need. This has led to the increase in homelessness and also violent crimes committed by people with untreated mental illness.
@skellymom11 жыл бұрын
Sadly, add to that the growing number of veterans coming home to the US-the highest number of women vets, too who need good mental healthcare...and that makes it even more dismal.
@mydh12211 жыл бұрын
I hope that you realize that it was an ACLU lawsuit that forced the de-institutionalization of the mentally ill. The ACLU argued that institutionalizing the mentally ill took away their rights and freedom. It was NOT a policy initiated by Reagan. John Green, conveniently, leaves out that important fact.
@Kat22Kit11 жыл бұрын
mydh122 I didn't say Reagan did anything, I was just pleased anyone has brought up the issue at all! But yes the lawsuit was the initiator. What I do know is that one hospital in my city, just kicked out its patients onto the street upon its closing. Leaving these people with nothing else but to live on the streets. There were not then nor now enough safeguards to allow the severely mentally ill a safe place to live where they would be monitored.
@Imhornydadcomeinside10 жыл бұрын
mydh122 You are correct, however being a "conservative" Reagan had no problems defunding anything with health care+poor people.
@GodofKillers1217 жыл бұрын
Imhornydadcomeinside "liberals"
@thatguyoverthere4686 жыл бұрын
He completely skipped over the fact that Reagan had a great sense of humor
@parrotboss7855 жыл бұрын
like trump
@lavaniadelrey28075 жыл бұрын
Parrot Boss yes, just like trump
@saamyar95245 жыл бұрын
@@lavaniadelrey2807 Much, much, greater then Trump's.
@shawnmoore13195 жыл бұрын
That Guy Over There the best
@bearcatben47625 жыл бұрын
and he liked jelly beans. I have seen his portrait made in jelly beans
@Farb_dk6 жыл бұрын
Reagan didn't cut the Medicare, Social Security, etc... Because of the congress
@Scixxy11 жыл бұрын
I was not a fan of Reagan when he was in office. I'll say this, though: his successors made him look a lot better.
@pyruvatepersonage11 жыл бұрын
I am still a fan of Reagan for that reason. Very well said!
@garfieldfarkle4 жыл бұрын
Clintonomics outperformed Reaganomics and balanced the budget.
@raghul00784 жыл бұрын
@@garfieldfarkle at that time US was at an arms race with USSR so spending was very high.
@garfieldfarkle4 жыл бұрын
@@raghul0078 If one spends more, one must FIRST have more to spend. During the 1980 campaign, Ronald "Dutch" Reagan promised that tax cuts would trigger an economic boom that would balance the budget, then running a $133 billion deficit, in 2 years., as well as finance an increase in the defense budget. It was not defense spending, but tax cuts that blew a hole in the budget, just like they did under George W. Bush and just like under Trump. Under Reagan's timetable, 2 years later, the budget was not balanced, but the deficit had shot up from $133 billion to $300 billion and instead of a boom, we were in the worst recession since the Great Depression. Then Reagan reversed course and began signing tax increases and the deficit dropped, even as defense spending rose.
@raghul00784 жыл бұрын
@@garfieldfarkle ok
@justinfeller17774 жыл бұрын
8:20 Real talk though, what's up with carpeted bathrooms in the 80s???
@pc...4307 жыл бұрын
One Question? Why didn't you mention anything about the mass incarceration, the war on drugs, the private prisons making money from people in prison, police enforcement profits nor the effects on the black communities These are many things that were really important for many people in this time. There is a good Documentation about the Prison system in america called "the 13th".
@CarBuddy107 жыл бұрын
2:17 "He even carried the traditionally Democratic states of Illinois and New York" Illinois was actually considered to be a swing state during (and before) Reagan's time. It wasn't until Bill Clinton's 1992 election that Illinois became more consistently Democrat-leaning. California has a similar history in this regard. However, imo West Virginia might be a better example in this regard, considering it was a Democrat-leaning state during the time, and Bill Clinton's elections would be the last time it voted for a Democrat leading to today.
@sleeplessvirus4 жыл бұрын
Illinois went for Kennedy in 1960 in an election that was completely honest, lacking any interference
@TheMarkusFIN8 жыл бұрын
Fun fact about trickle-down economics: Poverty in the US hit an all-time low (far lower than in the 50's or the 60's) in 2000, during the height of trickle-down economics when US was the most capitalist country in the world.
@jdoctopus94888 жыл бұрын
Fun fact about your comment bill clinton was president. With major regulations on companies.
@TheMarkusFIN8 жыл бұрын
***** Well overall there was less regulation. Some areas of business might have had more and some less but overall 2000 was the peak of US economic freedom.
@secularmonk51768 жыл бұрын
+Markus FIN Link...
@secularmonk51768 жыл бұрын
+Markus FIN Oh, how interesting: mjperry.blogspot.com/2010/09/us-poverty-rate-1959-to-2009.html Johnson's War on Poverty appears responsible for most of that drop from the 50s, and the ten years after Johnson had a comparable poverty rate to the SINGLE YEAR that you are celebrating. The 70s run ended because of loss of working class jobs and stagflation due to the rising global economy, whereas the "prosperity" of the dotcom boom is shown clearly to be an unsustainable sugar-high.
@TheMarkusFIN8 жыл бұрын
Len Arends Sure, as long as you actually bother responding after I give them. US poverty rate: 1.bp.blogspot.com/_otfwl2zc6Qc/TJgxEwPv7RI/AAAAAAAAObs/AU8XbvZCSdo/s1600/poverty.jpg US economic freedom (in this graph compared to Denmark's economic freedom): fee.org/media/12279/3m.png?width=100%&height=auto
@hiwayM911 жыл бұрын
I am continually amazed at how pragmatic John is- this topic and course of events in most anyone's hands in this day and age would become a segue into political soapbox diatribes (I know I can't refrain) My most sincere respect for relaying accurate info, instilling a sliver of your opinion without digressing, and offering a balanced assessment that leaves the viewer plenty of things to ponder. At this point even if John did forget to be awesome, the residual compensates.
@111asel8 жыл бұрын
I love the way John roasts himself.
@JunSian10015 жыл бұрын
Oh, stagnated wage.. It is still with us in 2019.
@HyperIonMake4 жыл бұрын
Still waiting for those trickle-down economics to kick in.......
@chefkendranguyen11 жыл бұрын
Good episode, John. Much appreciated.
@ninarakic17718 жыл бұрын
John Green, you're a gem. Thanks for these videos (you as well Stan and also John from the past) they make my mornings and inspire me to learn more about the world I live in. Which is pretty great.
@RussTaylorLegend11 жыл бұрын
I have to say that I'm really impressed with the restraint shown in this episode. It was a very even handed take on a very polarizing presidency. I'm not sure I could keep my political bias out of a discussion of this presidency.
@TheBespectacledN00b11 жыл бұрын
Is it as polarising as Margaret Thatcher was this side of the pond? (To the point some people - though a lot of the Left did give them grief for it as well, to be fair - held parties celebrating her recent death).
@RussTaylorLegend11 жыл бұрын
Probably pretty close, and definitely for the same reasons that Thatcher was so reviled by left-leaning parties.
@TheBespectacledN00b11 жыл бұрын
It's interesting though, Baroness Thatcher (she got the title after resigning as PM) might be more so because Reagan could be optimistic and "speak without condescending" (I paraphrase), whereas she couldn't.
@RussTaylorLegend11 жыл бұрын
You bring up a good point. In his day, I think that Reagan was fairly well liked in both parties precisely for that reason. I think that most of the criticism of Reagan era politics came afterwards, when the negative effects of "trickle down" economics began the rear their ugly head in full.
@TheBespectacledN00b11 жыл бұрын
Also possibly the industrial disputes in the USA were nowhere near as vitriolic as some of the ones over here. By the sounds of it, Reagan's showdown with the controllers doesn't sound anything like as divisive as the 1984 coal miner's strike.
@communisttrash85904 жыл бұрын
"the government is the problem so make me incharge of the government so i will make the military bigger thus giving the government more power"
@GleeChan11 жыл бұрын
Big props for talking about politics while not getting personally political.
@TheTariqibnziyad6 жыл бұрын
"we never fix the problems we always fix the things that are fine" John Green.
@Goreuncle11 жыл бұрын
Leaving the French joke aside, I liked this episode a lot. I would've liked to hear about Reagan's financial deregulation which led to the current financial meltdown. The point of choosing Reagan over some other REAL politician was the fact that he was a known actor, a good communicator as John said. Why? Because the agenda was already planned by others (financial powers, lobbyists, etc.), all they needed was a face/image that could sell it to the people and that was a job for a PR agent, an actor like Reagan, who could deregulate away with a smile in his face.
@RonaldReaganRocks110 жыл бұрын
You mean the part where liberals forced banks to give mortgages to poor people? That is what caused the meltdown.
@scottmatthews230010 жыл бұрын
RonaldReaganRocks1 The liberals certainly have their share of the blame... Reagan started the ball rolling with the financial deregulation... He literally cut positions of the people who were supposed to keep Wall Street honest. Every president since Reagan (Bush1, Clinton, Bush2, etc.) conservative and liberal alike, have continued on this trend of deregulating wall street and getting big donations to their party from the the wall street companies who operate in the dark.
@creeper52enderman7 жыл бұрын
Scott Matthews deregulation didn't do anything to hurt the economy
@BradyPostma4 жыл бұрын
I wish Republicans were still this optimistic.
@PatrickHogan11 жыл бұрын
I would love to see a Crash Course series on US Presidents. I think it would be interesting. Have an episode per president amd go over life, policies, running mates, people running against them, et cetera. I think it would help put into perspective our presidents and politics, and would really help those who will be voting for the first time in 2016 to really be able to choose the candidate that is right for them, and not just who their parents like (or dislike). Just a thought.
@ikesteroma11 жыл бұрын
So I halfway expected this to be a hit-job on the Gipper, and was pleasantly surprised that it wasn't. I suspect that there are a huge number of Neocons that would be utterly offended that Green wasn't slobbering in adoration over Reagan, but for myself, despite his faults, he is one of my favorite presidents.
@z-beeblebrox11 жыл бұрын
Surprise surprise, John Green doesn't have an agenda. Although you get the impression that even pure neutrality counts as an evil liberal agenda to some people.
@ikesteroma11 жыл бұрын
Eugene Conniff Nah. Everyone has an agenda, even J. Green. For sure, Green shoots left of center, but he tends to be fair, and I'm okay with that.
@z-beeblebrox11 жыл бұрын
"agenda" implies planning, organization, and action. An explicit goal. "To make an agenda". You can't accidentally have an agenda purely due to your biases. At least not in the way I see the word. It's either intentional or it doesn't exist. Everyone has biases; not everyone has an agenda.
@JOXCY6 жыл бұрын
I didn't think this video was too biased. He brought up a lot of the positives of the Reagan administration such as their economic boom, clamping down on the out of control unions (us Brits had a similar problem that got so bad that not even bodies were being buried at one point), and his role in steering the US out of the Cold War (I wouldn't give him full credit, but I believe he was the last important figure in a long line of presidents who had worked towards realising that goal). I've got to say that there hasn't been a president since made of the same mettle that Reagan was. Look at the videos of his negotiations with the university lecturers during the student riots, the man was certainly a great communicator!
@generalphobia4 жыл бұрын
The fact that John was able to talk about Supply-side economics and call it trickle-down economics with a straight face lost any possibility of me taking this video seriously
@alexitoussaint27774 жыл бұрын
finally somebody gets it
@Fischdosepremium4 жыл бұрын
Yeah, that was painful. Also it's not about the rich spending more, unless you call investment spending (which you don't).
@dangelobenjamin11 жыл бұрын
I like how John Green does his shows from a liberal point of view, but makes really solid arguments for the conservatives viewpoint. He does a great job staying fairly neutral. And as always, the history lessons was great.
@JoeDavis11 жыл бұрын
He is good at reporting the facts neutrally, but does a bad job staying neutral with anything that can be interpreted either way.
@lahaineaveugle11 жыл бұрын
How can anyone be neutral with anything that could be interpreted?
@JoeDavis11 жыл бұрын
Centide Aiphix you said it, "could be," not has to be. If something cannot be said neutrally he could say it both ways.
@lahaineaveugle11 жыл бұрын
Joe Davis Sorry, I have difficulties to dealing with modals :p (pour french guy with bad english teachers) but you said "can be" interpreted. Is this interpretation necessarily pros or cons, our could it be, as any interpretation, more subtle? To be frank I really don't know which part of the course we are talking about...
@JoeDavis11 жыл бұрын
Centide Aiphix As far as which part of the course we are talking about, I'm talking about the whole thing in general. For the rest of your comment, I don't know how to directly answer. Basically, as Americans, we view our history through one of two lenses, for the most part. Those lenses being conservative and liberal produce, at times, opposite conclusions. This channel purports to teach history, and does a pretty good job; but when it comes to teaching something that can be interpreted in two opposite directions, I believe it is appropriate to teach the facts and leave the interpretations to the students
@NanZingrone11 жыл бұрын
I was worried how you were going to handle this era: I spent a significant amount of it arguing with my Mother on the pros and cons of Regan and his policies (she the daughter of Democrats who became a Republican when she hit voting age, and me the opposite). But it was balanced. Looking forward to next week.
@VS24AT11 жыл бұрын
How will he cover the current admin??? maybe it's best not covered since the current admin is still cutting deals to line their pockets before 2016 ends and the pardon pen starts to spill ink
@mustang617210 жыл бұрын
I want all the kids watching to know that the carpeted bathroom was a real thing and remains a terrible idea.
@PumaFau9 жыл бұрын
That is just inconceivable to me. I still cant believe they existed.
@UniteForgetLeftRight9 жыл бұрын
My parents house still has TWO carpeted bathrooms
@jrenae759 жыл бұрын
Weird thing is my grandma was such a neat freak, her carpeted bathrooms actually worked! But she was a rare breed.
@sassycassgames31589 жыл бұрын
mustang6172 I used to live in a single-wide trailor built in the 90's, and the bathroom in it had one of those...... and whats worse is the entire room....toilet, bath-tub, walls, and for a while... the floor, was PAAAAYNK..... I dont mean pink, I mean PAAYNK...... Its literally gave you a migraine just to look IN THE ROOM..... God, I hated it....
@ceilingsandfloors9 жыл бұрын
AttentionJunkie mine too! it's just very inconvenient.
@Alfakatt4 жыл бұрын
”This wasn’t bias whatsoever”...
@milosminion11 жыл бұрын
Do a crash course on the Wilcox revolutions in a Hawaii. It was a violent and often glossed-over period in our 50th state's history that was essential for making it what it is today.
@Mobius1411 жыл бұрын
"Greed is Good" is a misquote, John. He actually said "The point is, ladies and gentlemen, that greed, for lack of a better word, is good".
@3lapsed11 жыл бұрын
Diana Peña the more quotes are misquoted the further it can get from it's core truth. This misquote the same fact is conveyed however if someone, somehow, manages to misquote that then we may change the meaning entirely.
@laurenbrowning633010 жыл бұрын
Honestly, I just watched this for a quick overview of some information for a History course... but, I have to say this was incredibly interested and entertaining. I appreciate the candid thoughts about where we were and where we are now as a country (and how it really has not changed much). Thanks for a fun and informative video! Wish you were my history teacher.
@thestranger55644 жыл бұрын
7:58 Remember when we wanted to stay neutral in world war 2 and FDR invited his defense cabinet to strike back at Japan because of the lives of many loss in Pearl Harbor and the defense Department was like "Uhhh we cannot." Then FDR stood up from his chair seeing the defeat in his countrymen and told them "Don't tell me it can't be done." And then had Congress declare a state of war against Japan.
@BramClaes11 жыл бұрын
If a politician uses the word freedom a lot, or claims to act in the name of it, that is already a red flag for me
@burgerboot11 жыл бұрын
So you would rather hear em talk about oppression?
@mandpanda7 жыл бұрын
"Someday maybe you'll be almost interesting" dang he just roasted himself
@BradyPostma4 жыл бұрын
It's also a complicated logic joke. Because he is me-from-the-past's future. So he's reminding his past self that insulting his own future is still insulting himself.
@takebackkean11 жыл бұрын
the french are not cowards they just raised the tax on the rich back up to a reasonable 70%
@TheIrishSpectre11 жыл бұрын
And that tax increase is destroying their tax base. You can't suddenly increase rates by that much in today's world if you want to avoid driving everyone making over $1 million out. Since the Socialist government raised that tax, the amount of people leaving France has increased 500-600%, destroying their tax base.
@ByzantineBob9611 жыл бұрын
then that would make them stupid cowards.
@takebackkean11 жыл бұрын
he is also just making up facts. ignore the trolls.
@TheIrishSpectre11 жыл бұрын
takebackkean I'm assuming you're referring to me. I am not making up facts. French businessmen and the wealthy elite are leaving France in droves because of the policies of the Socialists, and it is having a definite effect on the French economy and tax revenues. The rich need to pay their fair share, certainly, but when there are nations right next door that don't tax their millionaires to 75% of their income, the cost of migration is far less than the cost of paying the damned tax, aiding the exodus.
@lahaineaveugle11 жыл бұрын
TheIrishSpectre All this is nonsense. On witch analysis do you claim this? As a french, well aware about what's going on in my country, I can tell you that our tax base is not the problem but only that fact that most wealthiest people aren't paying enough because we don't have the same laws for the french citizen that live outside the country as you USA does. In France, you pay your taxes in the country you live in. So most of the rich guys prefer live in Switzerland, Monaco or Belgium so that they can't be legally taxed on their income made in France! And it cost around 35 billons euros a year to the french state!
@benitosorensen64255 жыл бұрын
Supply side economics is NOT trickle down economics ( which in itself is not a economic theory and has never been proposed). The “trickle Down” stuff is a straw man and the purpose of supply side economics is that the government takes less of a percentage of the taxpayers money ,which will spur economic growth, therefore people will invest their money back in to the economy to generate wealth, and the government will receive more in revenue because the people in general are making more money. And it is not only the rich that receive tax cuts but all of the population of every social class I just want everyone to know that the Supposed “trickle down theory” is not the same as supply side economics Hope everyone has a nice day😁
@tunajinnie5 жыл бұрын
supply side economics is what supporters called it and "trickle down economics" is what foes called it. U may be right in a different way, but in this case he was just quoting the literal history book that I and many others use for their AP US history class lol just an explanation
@tongpoo89855 жыл бұрын
@@tunajinnie You have a biased history book.
@shadow_of_thoth5 жыл бұрын
It spurs economic growth... for the ultra-wealthy. The statistics on wealth distribution since the '80s are extremely clear. There is no real debate to be had about it. The wealthy have benefitted from Reagan's policies. That is all. The middle class has been consistently shrinking, while the lower class continues to grow. People have unprecedented amounts of debt, wages have not increased at all, and the cost of living has been rising ever since. The top 1% owns approximately 50% of the total wealth in the country. The bottom 90% owns 20%. This is Reagan's fault. Before he took office, the numbers were far more equally distributed. We desperately need another FDR to implement a New Deal type program for the modern era. It worked to pull us out of the Great Depression; it can work to repair the damage done since Reagan too. We need checks and balances on the economy as well as on the government. The only difference between dictators and CEOs is the type of power that they have. One has the power to control other people's lives through the government; the other has the power to control other people's lives through the economy. They are both elites that must be restricted for the protection of the rights and freedoms of the common people.
@Jjb-gk4ce5 жыл бұрын
No Name you realize CEO's can be fired, right? That billionaires don't own even half their money in liquid funds, and that billionaires spend their money, right?
@Jjb-gk4ce5 жыл бұрын
TheNonArtist Billionaires have most of their money invested in their company. You're showing your naïveté. How do you think they own their companies if they don't own a majority of the stocks lmao.
@Ben.....11 жыл бұрын
Not an unfair reading of Reagan. Good episode.
@TacComControl11 жыл бұрын
Reagan's push for additional testing of who he considered "High Risk" groups(Specifically homosexuals) lead to a national mindset, or at least rode on it, that AIDS was the Gay's Disease. To quote Reagan himself when it comes to his prejudice towards the GLBT community... "My criticism is that [the gay movement] isn’t just asking for civil rights; it’s asking for recognition and acceptance of an alternative lifestyle which I do not believe society can condone, nor can I." And before anyone says "Reagan wasn't a racist", let us not forget that this is the man that loudly opposed the CRA and the VRA both. He often talked about States Rights when it came to voting(And by proxy, the state's "Right" to discriminate), even though he flipflopped on the CRA later on. However, he went on to veto the Civil Rights Restoration Act(Congress overrode his veto), and attempted to veto the establishment of MLK Day as a national holiday(He only withdrew when a veto-proof majority made it clear that it was going to happen whether he liked it or not). He was unapologetic in his racism, and in his homophobia, and the world is far, far better off without him.
@Alverant11 жыл бұрын
***** According to you. Reality has a different view.
@TheTurbofish10 жыл бұрын
Why do you suggest states rights is by proxy the right to disciminate? Are suggesting even the federal government by proxy has a right to discriminate because at one point in time there was slavery? It seems to me you associate "states rights" with the civil war(slavery) because that is what it was fought over. States rights could do a lot of good for everyone in any aggenda LBGT, legalizing weed, gun rights, health care. Why do we need big brother telling us when we can do something when we already know what and how to do it?
@2011e92M310 жыл бұрын
TheTurbofish Because it was historically clear and TODAY (see Republican voting restrictions enacted as we speak since the recent Supreme Court ruling) still clear that when left to certain states to decide on voting laws, they'll lean towards discriminatory practices. Do you even have the slightest clue of American history over the past 100yrs? If southern states were using discriminatory voting practices and the federal government had to step in to stop such practices how can you ask why would someone assume there's a correlation between states rights and discrimination? Maybe I'm misunderstanding you but you don't seem to properly understand the context of which these topics are based in. That's why you had the government establish Civil and voting rights because the States (mostly southern) were allowing abuse on an egregious level. Heck they didn't even allow minorities and women to vote until only several decades ago. So the government had to step in to create said rights because the states refused to do anything about discriminatory practices. So clearly this country needed a "big brother" at a time when the States refused to acknowledge all of their citizens.
@rrni23438 жыл бұрын
Earth - Mostly Harmless. John Green - Almost interesting.
@rrni23438 жыл бұрын
***** It's a Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy reference, I was reminded of that particular bit when John Green said 'I'm glad to be almost interesting me from the past. Someday maybe you'll be almost interesting'. And than imagined how that would look like if you had to condense any noteworthy thing in the galaxy into one or two words.
@NequeNon7 жыл бұрын
Dear John Green, Fan here. Your condescension and assuming posturing as if pained to judge others' efforts from on high is...delightful. Best wishes, Someone other than John Green
@BrendenFP11 жыл бұрын
I'm sad to see John labling the French "cowardly" for their distaste for war, as if it's a bad thing. They, as a nation, have been through some horrendous history, bloody and wrought with war (a lot of which their own doing *cough* Napoléon *cough*) and culminating in their country being brutally invaded by Germany on no less than three occasions.
@briancromwell60216 жыл бұрын
Thanks to everyone at crash course (especially Stan). You are helping me study for my APUSH test and my teacher taught me nothing lol.
@rigobertogiusti36374 жыл бұрын
SECTION 8. Clause 1. The Congress shall have Power to lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States. When ever you say the founding fathers wouldn’t recognize our country because of welfare programs like social security etc. I just think of this part of our constitution.
@devchan43166 жыл бұрын
The only reason why I remember what "voodoo economics" is is because of Ferris Bueller's Day Off
@ButzPunk11 жыл бұрын
Trickle down economics: "the rich pissing on the poor"
@alelioi17104 жыл бұрын
Trickle down economics is a fallacy in it self
@maxdicola111 жыл бұрын
How are the french cowards!? We were the first people to fight for a egalitarian revolution and we work towards Liberty, equality and fraternity. However I agree that the US is really a special country because it is capable of recover from very severe crisis.
@metallicakixtotalass11 жыл бұрын
Seriously, the hating on the French is totally baseless and bullshit.
@Cucumber-ej1pm11 жыл бұрын
Well the American Revolution did happen several years before the French Revolution ... and also didn't lead to a tyrannical warmongering dictatorship just saying.
@ethanlevine193511 жыл бұрын
Quinn Weber We also fought to keep in place most policies of Great Britain, but under local rule.
@MollyGermek11 жыл бұрын
Because you didn't join the Iraq war. That's literally all it is.
@jfridy11 жыл бұрын
The US loves to mock the French. It's like a national hobby or something. France is seen as being weak and effeminate, since they needed allied assistance in both world wars, but then later seemed quite ungrateful to the US and British for it. Strangely their problems against the Germans in WWII and defeat in the Napoleonic Wars and the Franco Prussian War have created a strange image of the French as poor fighters, when the French have a long and brutal military tradition. Also France hasn't jumped into wars in the last 30 years. They focused on trying to be a world leader that wasn't going to demand obedience like the US or USSR.
@x0cx1024 жыл бұрын
I just checked my remote learning APUSH notes my teacher provided on presidential domestic/foreign policies, and this video hit basically every major point and historical event that was in my notes. Great video!
@Thumbnailsquid57672 жыл бұрын
I’d love to see a redo of the us history series every fifteen years .. not too far now
@Thumbnailsquid57672 жыл бұрын
Or at least much closer than when I first had this thought a few years ago
@shutupsprinkles7 жыл бұрын
CARPETED BATHROOMS. I THOUGHT I WAS THE ONLY ONE WHO HAD ONE GROWING UP.
@Gewehr_311 жыл бұрын
Reagan was a good cold war president... He also gave fantastic speeches. Other then that, I have no good words for him.
@Vnam7211 жыл бұрын
"It's about us collectively deciding what we mean when we talk about freedom and equality." Explain how we collectively decide something and what happens when someone disagrees.
@thepencilwarrior49477 жыл бұрын
"Oh yeah, the French." Haha laughed so hard at this xD
@dylanlager70684 жыл бұрын
The French comment won me over. I’ll subscribe now.
@BoldOpal11 жыл бұрын
Is it to late to nominate John Green for the 2016 election?
@bookcreator11 жыл бұрын
He'd get my vote!
@BoldOpal11 жыл бұрын
***** I think that the minimum age in the US to be president is 35 (or at least that is what the internet is telling me), and John is 36.
@evil00198711 жыл бұрын
BoulderOpal Why do they have an age limit?
@tehboyscout11 жыл бұрын
Patrik Lilja Ageism
@BoldOpal11 жыл бұрын
Patrik Lilja Because our founding fathers knew that young people were idealistic idiots, with no practical experience that would make them successful at the job (I can say this because I am one as well).
@skellymom11 жыл бұрын
John, I sooo appreciated your headdesk! Yes, the US is great at fixing things that work...*sigh*...
@hyperbolicraider48485 жыл бұрын
Reagan was one of the best and the most funniest president. He always has the jokes.
@osmiumsoul95354 жыл бұрын
The founding fathers already laid out the government's goal, it's not a vague mystery what they meant. "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. - That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed..."
@neospacedout5 жыл бұрын
heck yes night before AP exam
@kyoyarenji92545 жыл бұрын
Anika Jackson I felt that in my soul, I have an exam tmrw morning
@nolanmartin35737 жыл бұрын
I guess Hillary was just as unelectable as Jimmy Carter.
@zionnuby8425 жыл бұрын
When you realize that Hillary has never lost the popular vote in her life but Reagan lost twice in his life, and that Hillary won more votes then he did
@leokennedy76245 жыл бұрын
Jack Bat How did it damage his reputation? Was the crisis his fault? Did he start it?
@squamish42445 жыл бұрын
No, but like many presidents who have bad stuff happen that they have no control of, he was blamed anyway. And he got blamed mostly for how long it took to end, although it was a very tough situation and he did eventually negotiate an end to it.
@maddoxbellrose76795 жыл бұрын
@@zionnuby842 That was an awkward "when you realize..."
@garlicbrad79165 жыл бұрын
@@leokennedy7624 I mean, after the shah died in America, Khomeini literally said he would only release the hostages when Carter was no longer president. Soooo...
@WilliamSarokon4 жыл бұрын
Good show. 43 years old & I love crash course in history!!!!!
@Radomstuff-tf1lm8 жыл бұрын
Alright.. The French
@guillermofernandez68848 жыл бұрын
hahahha the french
@PhilipCripe8 жыл бұрын
As a French minority politician I agree with that joke.
@MissKimory8 жыл бұрын
Come on we deal with some of our problems *look at the actual situation in France* Bon nevermind I'm moving to Canada anyway
@juliedufour22307 жыл бұрын
Perhaps we'll all move to Canada next week X')))
@benoncle14687 жыл бұрын
I just wish Voldepen would go home and not invade France's presidency.....
@lidlett98835 жыл бұрын
Having been alive and paying attention at the time your synopsis of Reagan gets a D+
@christopherdavis18605 жыл бұрын
The dude is literally just stating facts.
@Blalack774 жыл бұрын
10:19 - Where he's calling the Soviet Union "the Evil Empire".... Notice the Rage Against the Machine album at the bottom of the shelf... Also named "Evil Empire"..
@prodwysp4 жыл бұрын
T H A T S T H E J O K E I D O T
@parkertighe85307 жыл бұрын
a rising tide lifts all boats but most of us can't afford boats so we just drown
@napoleon_bonaparte24627 жыл бұрын
GINI coefficient (measure of inequality) doesn't seem to change with respect to left or right political power.
@giorgilabadze49554 жыл бұрын
A spot on Gorbachev's head :) This guy has one of the most perfected historical humor on youtube
@PaulStewart5511 жыл бұрын
Reagan a great man, that’s hilarious
@Rambo552935 жыл бұрын
God bless Reagan 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
@SKSer4511 жыл бұрын
Here's a fun fact....Ronald Reagan was a spokesperson for V8.
@Lutranereis11 жыл бұрын
This is the part of US history that I really hate. The part that I have lived through and lead to all the problems I see around me today. I look at that generation that was in charge of the US back then and wonder why they didn't do more to fix our country and our world to give all of us a better life than what we've had. It's frustrating, and I can only hope that when my generation is finally in a position to reshape our world that we do so favorable for generations to come, not just to suit ourselves.
@VS24AT11 жыл бұрын
Maybe you should hold the next administration more accountable so ; "We won't be fooled again" or just stay the course and continue to throw red and blue kool aide finger points at others. Same as it always has been seems the rich get richer Yes,? Yes they can ?
@douglasroach80795 жыл бұрын
I especially like how Reagan ramped up the drug war, by militarizing our police forces and creating mandatory minimum sentences. Policies that continue to this day. Thanks Ronnie!
@louise-yo7kz5 жыл бұрын
🤯😡
@alwillk5 жыл бұрын
All while the CIA was paying a drug lord in Panama to kill communists. But eventually, like Saddam he fell out of favor with the Republicans.
@Akiraspin6 жыл бұрын
He also had an absolutely killer sense of humor that helped ease the American peoples paranoia and fear over the Soviet Union. Whenever he joked about communism he would elate some of the very real fear over nuclear holocaust. One of my favoritres; "There was a commissar and a farmer having a conversation in the Soviet Union, and the Commissar asked the farmer "So, how are the crops doing?" And the farmer said "Oh they're great! In fact if you stacked all the food in one big pile it would reach the foot of God." And the commissar looked at him in confusion and said "This is the Soviet Union. There is no God." And the farmer said "Well that's alright, because there's no food either!" LMAO
@paladingunny40829 жыл бұрын
11:22 I see that Fallout reference
@redcoat43489 жыл бұрын
+Paladin Gunny he did one in the episode before where he shows vault boy. think that's Caesar at 10:15. also i didn't catch it. i saw mad max though
@arcticfirst9 жыл бұрын
I can't tell what the guy on the left is. I know the right is probably a raider.
@TheRealPentigan9 жыл бұрын
+Anartik Guy on the left is wearing the iconic power armor from the covers of Fallout 1, 3 and possibly either BoS or Tactics.
@arcticfirst9 жыл бұрын
TheRealPentigan Ahh, I kinda see it now. Thank you.
@temporalTechnologist11 жыл бұрын
There is so much Ron Paul happening in the comments, holy crap.
@zestotemp11 жыл бұрын
huh?
@USAltefore11 жыл бұрын
There sure is!
@SageGarlandSingerSongwriter7 жыл бұрын
I love that their symbol in the document for relief was a toilet :P
@pukalo6 жыл бұрын
An unbiased history lesson of the Presidency of Ronald Reagan? I thought such a thing didn't exist!
@keatonr7766 жыл бұрын
I've noticed that as we get into later time periods more and more of your opinion comes through, not a complaint, or even a criticism just an interesting observation.
@ickytrip9 жыл бұрын
Can you imagine becoming president in part because you appealed to people who didn't like black Americans taking steps toward equality?
@MopedOfJustice9 жыл бұрын
ickytrip Can you imagine being a Republican President? All of them since Nixon employed the Southern Strategy (and Goldwater tried to the election before).
@connorleeming4259 жыл бұрын
ickytrip Can you imagine blaming a president for being racist because you are racist?
@ickytrip9 жыл бұрын
Connor Leeming Did you watch the video? There's a whole part about his strategy to appeal to racists. On purpose. He intentionally set out to appeal to racists. Watch it again.
@ickytrip9 жыл бұрын
It's the "Southern Strategy" - it's a real thing. look it up.
@Cardinalsarelame9 жыл бұрын
ickytrip You liberals are the most pathetic losers ever. Sad that you can afford a computer with your welfare money.
@marcosbeni58759 жыл бұрын
This wild assumptions about conservatives bother the heck out of me. 9:27 The "Christian right" is not equivalent to "Conservatives". The Christian right is only a subset of the Conservative set. 9:31 No common Conservative is proposing to have women leave the workforce. Conservatives respect each woman's decision: you want to join the workforce? Fine. You want to be a stay-home mom? Fine. Supporting stay-home moms is not equivalent to being against women joining the workforce. The two positions are not mutually exclusive. When will people understand that? 9:35 No common Conservative is against appointing women to the supreme court. Since when is that a thing attached to Conservationism?
@andrewkaster40338 жыл бұрын
+Marcos Beni You seem to be confusing contemporary conservatism with the conservatism of 30 years ago
@davidpatton9068 жыл бұрын
+Andrew Kaster No he isn't. The crap that this liberal site says about conservatives is BS.
@Alex-ud6zr8 жыл бұрын
+Marcos Beni I literally got the same result as you on that test. I bet you noticed how incredibly bias that test is as well. The creators think that people like Marco Rubio and Cruz and all those republican candidates are like 9.0,9.0 on that graph. They think Obama is like a 6.0,6.0. Makes no sense to me since I'm in the lower right and I consider myself an American conservative.
@marcosbeni58758 жыл бұрын
Alex A. Yeah, I'm not entirely sure either how they come up with those assessments for certain politicians.
@nitsuj74918 жыл бұрын
+Benedict Feser sure the black lives matter may have destroyed property (which i do not agree with, it puts a negative light on the whole movement), but you cant forget the KKK has also stabbed anti protestors and then later got released form jail with no charges. I dont see any ways that we give "special treatment" to African Americans other than affirmative action. and thats not because theyre inferior. Its because heavy oppression and segregation ended 50 to 60 years ago and it takes time for those communities to get on their feet. You really think that as soon as that stuff ended that everything would just fall into place? It goes a lot deeper than that. Systematic racism is very real and a lot of people dont notice it. There are a lot of people alive today that lived through segregation and saw it end which means that there are still a lot of people with racist and/or prejudice mentalities, whether that person is aware or not.
@wtgardner69146 жыл бұрын
I am a conservative since Reagan, but I enjoyed your look at the era. Anyone who thinks critically, should be looking at opposing views more than just immersing themselves in views that bolster their own opinion. Thank you for this video. It was greatly informative and inspirational.