The Real Crisis in Cosmology - The Big Bang Never Happened

[@nomdeguerre8926]

There's another crisis that is far more serious: the breakdown of rigorous, scientific methodology, due to the fact that science is funded by entities that seek to legitimize predetermined conclusions.

[@q09876543]

You also have the problem that due to the need for funding, researchers will fudge their findings

[@pretorious700]

Absolutely, and very well stated.

[@marcussanchez4278]

The reality or this world is a lie

[@christopherbird4870]

What are the predetermined conclusions? Predetermined by who? Why do they want those conclusions and not others?

[@christopherbird4870]

What entities?

[@paxwallacejazz]

A higgs boson walks into a Catholic church and the priest says "Thank God you're here without you we couldn't have Mass."

[@spinny2010]

Boom tiche

[@drezilla1310]

The funny thing is, is that it’s a Jesuit priest that came up with the Big Bang theory

[@dystopiandissident4793]

A rapist a priest and a pedophile walk into a bar. He orders a drink

[@Nocturne83]

Haha 😅

[@q09876543]

Nice job! Here's a COVID joke for you. They say we're suppose be 6 feet apart from one another. But I only have 2 feet.

[@jackblevel8296]

This is amazing, what humanity needs is more fact finders and truth tellers like this. Don't regurgitate the accepted paradigm, question everything. Well done Eric J Lerner, Lerner by name, Teacher by nature.

[@stargazer4023]

This is a fantastic series of presentations, delivered in the spirit of a true scientist. Dr. Lerner has a sharp, critical wit as he methodically dismantles the BB theory and exposes its many serious flaws in the light of observational evidence. Well done. We need more like Dr. Lerner.

[@JohnnyArtPavlou]

After Joe Rogan convinced Jordan Peterson to try DMT.

[@mikexhotmail]

lol good one

[@zane01235]

Lol

[@torspang7674]

hahaha

[@StefanReich]

And?? What happened next????

[@JohnnyArtPavlou]

Stefan Reich, yet another crisis in cosmology. Can’t talk about it here. 🌎🌟☄️💥💫⚡️🌞

[@M-Swede]

Damn! I watched ten seasons of the Big Bang Theory and now you tell me it never really happened.

[@rumples2698]

Mmmmmm Penneeee !

[@kunalhalder615]

Hahahaha 😂 and I purchase astronomy books costs near 10 thousand bucks! 😭

[@gregorysagegreene]

Hated that show. Every time the trailer came on I thought hey it's the science channel.

[@ZedRod87]

I didn't know Steven Tyler was a scientist

[@TCBYEAHCUZ]

ah fuck that's hilarious

[@HigherPlanes]

Who?

[@lapisredux]

i didn't know eric was the lead singer of aerosmith.

[@adriaticbatman]

I am sure Steven knows more Physics

[@PC160]

That's his brother, Uneven.

[@harrykirk7415]

Damn. I based my whole life on the validity of the Big Bang Theory. That why I started my Pest Control business and got married. Now I find out I was just living a life of delusion, and I have to start over. Stupid Big Bang Theory.

[@cnault3244]

Don't worry about it. Other scientists with higher degrees than Lerner's BA in physics have dismissed Lerner's work.( curious that he published his hypothesis in book form rather than submitting it for scientific peer review.

[@alchemy3264]

@@cnault3244 Oh that'll sort it. How effective can peer review be if all the peers are barking up the wrong tree? And let us not pretend that this cannot happen.

[@RobertMCroft]

@@alchemy3264 Spot on.

[@christopherbird4870]

@@alchemy3264 Possible but very unlikely. Peer review is all their is, and he should submit his hypothesis for examination, like all other scientists. Give an example where ALL the peers were"barking up the wrong tree" and they dismissed somebody's scientific 'truth'?

[@markdal49]

Peer review is great...in theory... in practice? Editorial gatekeeping is a real thing( for good or ill), but it is a thing.... and woe betide you if you go against the scientific 'consensus'!

[@SlowRiderDucati]

As a PhD physicist myself who can bench press 465 lbs I take the highest offense to being portrayed as weak and goofy like the TV Show the big bang, I also take offense to the big bang theory as well of course.

[@revolution51]

Youth: you arrange your hair to the existing style. A Bit older: you arrange your style to the existing hair.

[@_XR40_]

Actually, I don't think his hairstyle has changed since the 90s....

[@redsix49]

funny... but so true ©

[@allisbeneathme3350]

Lol..... Thank you man

[@subtle0savage]

@@_XR40_ He was born looking like that. With a silver fusion reactor in his mouth.

[@revolution51]

@@redsix49 That is from a birthday card I got from my son when I turned 50. I've been there.

[@cameronosborne7405]

This man has my attention merely from the hair and sweater.

[@thetruthexperiment]

My local alcohol merchant thinks I’m a scientist because of my hair.

[@johnengland7135]

Intelligence is not based on personal appearance.

[@johnengland7135]

Big bang, you need a Big Bong to believe it...

[@6c45pi]

@@johnengland7135 citation please

[@paulmanning8897]

Both of which are too large. On the Einstein/S.I./Sillimetric scale that is.

[@BluesDoctor]

Eric, Thank you for your skillful and compelling argument. Reminding an old dog, tangled in the Dogma of physics today, that new evidence should be considered with an unbiased mind. The term Fringe science does not apply when faced with these collection of facts. Freeman Dyson has a lengthy interview on KZbin broken into 5 to 10 minutes clips on his mathematical work during the development of the quantum models. He refers to the effort of cleaning up the messiness reconciling the experimental data to the theoretical models represented in the Feynman Diagrams. I could cite a few examples but simply when the data evidence doesn't support the doctrine, then you have to question the doctrine. I congratulate you and look forward to your further posts on this topic.

[@waynebow-gu7wr]

Are you telling me that the future didn't create the past.... That would mean the Terminator isn't true !

[@Cooliemasteroz]

I’m surprised that there’s a crisis, I always thought that cosmology was looking up.

[@541raymond]

hahahahaha har de har har

[@williamrthompsonjr556]

It's only a crises for those Cosmologists that BELIEVE in the Big Bang and their god Einstein. There are cosmologists that are researching an alternative to the Big Bang, Electric Universe theory. Of course, Big Bang believers are constantly debunking Electric Universe theory as though their jobs depend on it, because they probably do. Visit the Electric Universe site and the Thunderbolts.info site, if you're interested.

[@allanlindsay8369]

Tim Hill Hello and greetings. Brilliant!

[@Cooliemasteroz]

@@allanlindsay8369 thanks mate.

[@waynebow-gu7wr]

Hey Tim.... looks like we've been looking up at 'Taurus the Bull ... because it's all been Bull Shit !

[@aleph2d]

I did my part, I wrote "crisis in cosmology" into google 139 times last year.

[@grraadd]

@ Fusion power is exactly the product of faulty Big Bang dogma... When you don't understand basic Universe construction and functioning, you can't build anything sensible.

[@petergriffins-claw8574]

@graadd And yet there's Norway.

[@VanishingNomad]

He has a book on his book shelf about cybernetics, emergence, self-organization, complex systems, negentropy and chaos theory.

[@MountainFisher]

In other words, crazy stuff in easy to understand English.

[@ch-arts-us]

i saw that too

[@kunalhalder615]

With some controversial books Stanley Karnow's Vietnam, Raphael Ezekiel's The Racist Mind, Out of Control, William Greider : Who Will Tell The People etc political related books. Hope he have the book Bomb!.... Joao Magueijo's Faster Than The Speed Of Light: The Story of a Scientific Speculation 😂

[@nickwalczak9764]

Eric, you do a great job of explaining this to the layperson - without using more jargon than necessary

UP!

[@smnwbb]

Not so successful explaining it to better scientists.

[@robydee920]

@@smnwbb That's because electric universe has same amount of proof as flat earth.

[@TuffCheez]

That was in layman's terms? I need layman's, layman's terms! 🤣

[@aaronmicalowe]

@@robydee920 I rewatched the entire video. At no point was the term "electric universe" used. Maybe Eric goes on to later posit an electric universe, but taken on it's own this video pretty much eviscerates the big bang theory.

[@jackwilmoresongs]

I saw a cartoon. It showed some white coated scientists standing around a chalk board with extensive complicated calculations. And one scientist was saying "The most depressing thing is that one day everything we believe here today will be proved wrong."

[@bradweir6993]

@1 Corinthians 13:12 KJV wtf??

[@Tenebrousable]

Newton wasn't ever disproven. All the mechanics still work as well as they did back when. They were just added on. And so it is with all physics since him. He might however, be misunderstanding the nature of science himself. Common occurance among cartoonists.

[@wayfa13]

@@bradweir6993 ikr x'D

[@simonsmith3030]

This is the problem with much of science. The idea that symbols on a board represent "science" without regard to experiment and observation. This was used in the "The Day The Earth Stood Still" where the alien visitor chalks up lots of mathematics on a earth scientist's blackboard. The Thunderbolts - Electric Universe - channel often mentions this meme...

[@robertcampbell6349]

The Farside?

[@masscomnet]

Only a scientist would chart the "awareness level of the crisis in cosmology". LOL

[@pooheadlou]

Who else is going to do it? An accountant?

[@deloachapproach4273]

@@pooheadlou - I'm accounting on it.

[@rovidius2006]

When they realized being on wrong street as the big bang takes them to God a search for new ideas commenced .

[@kjvnews8326]

Yea, "Crisis in Cosmology" the catch phrase of the year like Global warming or climate change. If you think this is a big deal watch this Y/T video on "Your News is Controlled": kzbin.info/www/bejne/oZrTY6pjeciYjJI

[@glarynth]

A scientist producing a video in 2020, or updating a video for publication in 2020, wouldn't end the chart in 2015, in the middle of a spike that occurs from time to time. See for yourself trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=US&q=crisis%20in%20cosmology

[@MrWizardofozzz]

A person whom never watches, or listening to the news, tv, and or the computer lives a far better life..!!

[@magistradox39]

That's right. I haven't watched any TV since more than 10 years. If people around me wouldn't not get their daily bread (fear mongering porn like Covid-19) from the mainstream media, I wouldn't even recognize this garbage.

[@MrWizardofozzz]

@@magistradox39 Well said and I truly believe the problems we face today could be resolved if we held the media accountable for publishing fake news.. It should be a crime..

[@carlpen850]

@@MrWizardofozzz ... so if we didn't have fake news then we wouldn't have a fake president today... that would be nice

[@carlpen850]

@@magistradox39 ... "wouldn't not"? "since more than 10 years"... I see grammar is not your forte... but I have a feeling that your inability to use correct grammar is not your main problem

[@magistradox39]

@@carlpen850 I'm not an English native speaker. What is my main problem?

[@davidparker2173]

What amazes me whenever I watch one of these advanced scientific articles is how much I actually grasp of it, which is some factor above zero, and when I become interested in any such subject, every time I watch or study the same subject, I am amazed that my factor over zero continues to escalate. Too many people believe that any such interest is quite beyond their grasp, but they should really not be intimidated. These are just people with a particular interest that is quite developed beyond the norm, and that, only from taking interest. One brick at a time; a journey of a thousand miles. Most of the universe and all therein is nothing but elusive truths. Our grasp of knowledge is infinitesimal. We have not even accomplished peace yet. Look at the group think, and those who exploit that from out of a depraved cause, and from out of the depraved cause always comes a depraved effect. The fall of man, and the cycle of civilization. It always goes back to to the same thing, and proceeds to the same thing, with it's beginning, and end always coming to meet. The first and the last, the beginning and the end, the alpha, and the omega, and the ever all in one, and the inevitability of what was, and will be. But I digress.

[@alexcooke9805]

I like that.

[@DaDocORock]

David: I often think similalrly to what you said (and said so very well, I'll add). As with this vid, I hear explanations and often I give myself the liberty to think, "Eh, not so sure about that one," while I stay open-minded enough to be educated by the one gracious enough to try to educate me. It truly is a "cycle of civilization", isn't it?

[@LittleRedDorrit-lc5cm]

Understanding it is easy... explaining it to others is very difficult, mainly due to memory retention limitations on strange new materials.

[@davidparker2173]

@@DaDocORock I am a very simple man, but I have a tremendous respect and appreciation for intelligence, especially for greater minds than my own, which tends to be ubiquitous, at least in one way or another. It is very good of these scientists for sharing their point of view. I am not knowledgeable enough to really have an opinion, but I think that the jury is still out on a lot of theories, and we do have to follow the evidence. Concerning my awkward digressions, I should not sideline the subject here in discussion from out of some sense of decency, and respect that I should not negate.

[@PhillipCummingsUSA]

Did you just write an entire page about how you understood the video?

[@soliscrown1272]

His sweater is the source of all his power. It is composed of exotic particles that should not exist in our reality.

[@gallezzo6650]

You're right. That sweater is awesome. Bet you it smells like coffee and cigarettes.

[@iamrocketray]

thats a proper arran jumper, a trawlermans/seaman jumper. not really for wearing indoors.

[@mrvaticanrag3946]

My grandma taught me how to knit these lovely cable stitch from natural Kiwi sheep wool 70years ago..

[@CoberBox1]

This is the first vid of his that I’ve come across. Went to check his channel hoping to see he wears it in all his videos. No such luck. Pretty sure he grabbed that thing out of a lost and found circa ‘78.

[@shelliewerner5624]

His hair too!

[@unsettledonpurpose]

Perfect at 1:75 speed.

[@Dialysisforever]

I find 1.5 is better for me. Thanks.

[@tonymcquarrie908]

I wish I found this comment sooner. Lol👍🇨🇦

[@bbsqtlead4939]

The great thing about science is that it is never “settled.” We have a long history where new information is discovered that contradicts established theories and often sends us in new directions establishing new theories, which, in turn, will be contradicted by future discoveries. This is what science is.

[@brianharrigan8821]

"THEORIES " dreams put to paper !!! Most all disproved. Political and religious dogma !!!

[@philipmcclure6273]

But in the meantime, treat it as absolute truth when challenged. Scientism is forever straying into logical, philosophical, and religious minefields.

[@da4]

Although the concept you present is true, people have been brainwashed into dogma which is as disruptive to progress as any religious dogma can be

[@carpathianhermit7228]

We're due for a paradigm shift we've made next to no progress on consciousness there seems to be a whole avenue of science involving something other than material that we haven't yet discovered or the general pop isnt privy to

[@SongWhisperer]

So basically, the theories presented by science are always right but somehow always wrong.

[@BadlandBrawl-h3z]

For various reasons I don’t except the Big Bang theory, and I have been searching for this information for years.... thank you.

[@maxbootstrap7397]

I knew the BigBang Theory was bogus when I was 8 years old. I was a serious astronomy addict, spent endless nights outside with my telescopes, and thought about astronomy questions a great deal, including the BigBang Theory. What I realized was, the BigBang Theory was inherent nonsense, a complete self-contradiction, and essentially an explicit denial of logic, rationality and science. Why so? Because the BigBang Theory necessarily claims *EVERYTHING == NOTHING.* Yes, that is precisely what it means. One nanosecond there was *NOTHING* ... absolutely *NOTHING* whatsoever. Then the next nanosecond there was *EVERYTHING* ... as in, the entire universe. Yeah, right. Anyone who is the least big logical, rational or scientific has to understand the BigBang Theory is complete nonsense. And so I did at age 8. No genius required. I've always been surprised how stupid people who call themselves "scientists" can be. Another point about the BigBang Theory. Exactly how can anyone be so completely certain that light traveling billions of light years through not-empty space (since there is in fact obviously no "empty space" in the entire universe, since it is chock full of electromagnetic fields literally everywhere) does not lose some energy during that process? After all, it interacts with an astronomical number of fields and atomic scale entities along the way. Any energy lost by the light as it travels across the visible universe can only present as a shift of the light to lower energy == longer wavelength == red shift.

[@xenonemos5835]

My daughter also came to the same conclusion when she was 8-years old, without even looking through a telescope.. And yes - I have been suspicious about the assumption that the speed and energy of light remains the same throughout it's journey, regardless of the distance traveled.. It seems that conclusions have been drawn based on that dubious assumption, and used in support of the Big Bang Theory..

[@The_Rebbe_is_Messiah]

@1 Corinthians 13:12 KJV Not to the origin of it

[@maxbootstrap7397]

@1 Corinthians 13:12 KJV : The universe is eternal. This is *NECESSARY.* For the universe to not be eternal requires *EVERYTHING == NOTHING* as mentioned above. No way around that. Incidentally, I assume everyone knows why "scientists" pushed so hard to advocate the BigBangTheory. Right? It was an attempt to "make peace" with religion. You see, you say to the religious authorities "we'll support your notion that god is eternal and can literally do anything (including blatant contradictions, presumably), and you accept that within the universe after its creation, that is our domain. And we can agree that we agree and there is no tension between religion and science. I also realized somewhere around age 8 that this attempted "peace treaty" of sorts must be the motivation for making such a certain pronouncement that the universe was created out of nothing in a huge explosion. Authoritarianism does not belong in science. They never should have done this. For sure the red-shift is damn interesting, and I'd love to be the one who figures out the exact reason that the wavelength of light gradually gets longer the further it travels through the universe. I have my own theory, but haven't figured out a way that I can prove it. It is very difficult to get a good handle on distances as huge as necessary to cause measurable red-shift. Incidentally, the whole entropy theory is just as inherently and obviously wrong and defective as the BigBang theory. Sad that some very fundamental aspects of reality have been so distorted by "mainstream science". As for your specific question, I don't know exactly what would constitute a "naturalistic" explanation for the universe. In general, the concept "explanation" implies (if not requires) causality. But if the universe is eternal, there was no "cause" for the universe itself or for its characteristics. So my sense is, to ask for a "naturalistic explanation" for the universe is an inherent intellectual error. It sure doesn't *FEEL* like an intellectual error, and in fact I feel the desire to have a "naturalistic explanation" for the universe too. However, after logical thought about the issue, I do believe that's an inherently invalid question. It is quite a bit similar to asking a religious person for a naturalistic explanation for god. Good luck getting an answer to that question! Hahaha.

[@maxbootstrap7397]

@@xenonemos5835 : You obviously have one sharp-minded daughter. I hope she has stayed as sharp and rational across the years despite all the pressures to "get along" and accept mainstream nonsense. Incidentally, I had not ever taken any spectra with my telescopes by age 8, so my conclusion was also only based upon reading and my own intellectual thought processes. It was over a decade more before I ever recorded spectra of galaxies and confirmed there is a red-shift of spectral lines.

[@danutagalecka2497]

You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. Unfortunately, you also have no idea that you have no idea . Your whole post is absolute drivel.

[@subtle0savage]

Eric, would love to see you in conversation with Sabine Hossenfelder.

[@Mikey-mike]

Same here.

[@nate_d376]

I don't think the universe could take that much crazy hair in one place...

[@Bix12]

2 buffoons flailing about? Not for me

[@RayStraiter]

@@Bix12 I just got wind of this guy and was immediately reminded of Brown's gas which robbed several of my work buddies of any possibility of early retirement. These are not victimless crimes. Alas.

[@Bix12]

@@RayStraiter That is unfortunate your friends lost their money investing in that scheme...I assume that's what happened. I keep going back to the old adage "if it seems to good to be true, it is".

[@GregJay]

Wonder what Eric thought of Voyager finding a 100 fold increase of highly charged electrons at the heliosphere, the sun's cathode plus the passing grade from Safire project towards the electric sun model

[@evanw2195]

Greg Jay what does that entail

[@kevinbill9574]

He thought it was a great laugh

[@WorksopGimp]

Fascinating theory the sun being an electrical discharge makes you think. Tessler said it was simple if you understand it

[@johnnyhatchet8770]

I thought everyone knew the sun is the backside of a blackhole

[@gctexaspt]

Captain Janeway of Voyager utilized the highly charged electrons at the heliosphere to boost the output of the dilithium crystals of the warp core so they could get back to earth sooner.

[@4Nanook]

Read Eric's book back when it came out, made sense then, still make sense now.

[@emanuelsferios5783]

I just finished Eric Lerner's book. What an amazing scientist and thinker! Thank you Eric for everything you have done and continue to do!

[@lardyify]

My problem with the Big Bang theory is that, from its inception, it has required bits to be added on to it because it did not match observations, as observations got better. First: inflation. Then dark matter, dark energy and a cosmological constant were added to fit the observations until now, we have a great, jumbled, mess of a theory that still doesn’t work properly.

[@ericlind6581]

Exactly! It’s a science fiction series with consensus-driven new shows.

[@british.columbia]

The big bang didnt happen.

[@eottoe2001]

Thanks for explaining this. A friend tried to explain it to me before and it went over my head. He was of the opinion that the Big Bang was in need of revision.

[@brianseibert3972]

Well done , very informative...and thank you for your efforts.

[@patriceortovent6451]

We could almost say that scientists in this field of research don’t make mistakes but rather fabricate mistakes. One should never underestimate the powerful and unlimited dimension of imagination of any human being on this planet. As we know, what appears is never what is its essence and never will be. The search for an answer about the origin of the universe and life on this planet called the earth is the equivalent of looking for a guilty person for a crime which didn’t happened in the first place. Furthermore, one can imagine any theory about the origin of life on earth, it will never change the fact that we have to travel in time with no hope for a return to any previous time which is another product of human imagination. Human intelligence is a very sharp double edge sword, watch how it is used, a dangerous tool which needs mastery, something we lack badly no matter how clever and educated we think we are.

[@joshuahopkins2507]

Real talk... except for that "planet" stuff ;-) Good luck out there =)

[@willieflores7140]

YOU ARE RIGHT THAT ALL THAT COSMOLOGISTS PUT OUT IS PURE IMAGINATION. THERE IS NO ORIGIN TO THE UNIVERSE. THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES FROM A COMMON ANCESTOR IS FALSE. AND THERE IS NO GOD. BUT I DO BELIEVE THE STARS EXIST.

[@denzilpenbirthy5028]

@@willieflores7140 How can anything have no origin ?

[@jasmineluxemburg6200]

Verbal garbage!

[@willieflores7140]

@@jasmineluxemburg6200 THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION HAS NOT SURVIVE THE SCRUTINY OF THE FITTEST MINDS. NO EVIDENCE HAS EVER BEEN FOUND FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD. DO YOU BELIEVE IN AN AFTERLIFE? NATURE ALREADY PROVIDES FOR THE CONTINUED EXISTENCE OF ALL SPECIES THROUGH THE PROCESS OF CELL DIVISION AND REPRODUCTION. EVERY CHILD BORN ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD IS OUR AFTERLIFE.

[@Verschlungen]

Excellent, and long overdue! This series will make a nice companion to his 1992 book, entitled The Big Bang Never Happened. That book ([c] 1991) should have been the start of the current 'crisis in cosmology'. (This connects also with the 'dark matter' nonsense that was announced so late in the game by the Establishment, as if it too were 'news'.) Well, better late than never.

[@DaDocORock]

Have we ever considered elements that we've never concieved? Maybe, upon the moment of existence, some particle we have never even known about was part of the process of creating our universe - one that decayed long before we could observe it. Perhaps that elusive element was crucial to everything that exists now. Just a (strange) thought.

[@anonymike8280]

Not strange at all. In fact, your "god particle" theory just could be the salvation of the big bang. God. Salvation. Get it. Get it.

[@Huuuuuuuuuuuu107]

@@anonymike8280 lol

[@olivierbolton8683]

Could the spectra we observe not be refracted through space and time affecting the results obtained? This video is quite fascinating...Thank you.

[@rarealan]

After many years of trying to understand the big bang theory , like you sir I realised there wasn't one !. My gut feeling told there wasn't one , but my mind keep trying to prove a big bang . The truth , the universe has always been there !. It's infinite , no beginning no end . The trouble with man kind is , we always have to have a beginning and an end . I would also add there are many universes , at least 12 possible 13 . One stranger than the next !. My uncle was a astronomer . He once said to me " son if we could truly understand the universe , it would scar the shit out of us " . A thought that has always stayed with me . Regards .

[@hj8607]

As a physicist I would change the the words "if we could truly understand the universe' . We will never understand the universe in it's entirety and that should scare humility into you . But with humility comes reverence and inner peace from knowing your place.

[@MrRollingstone66]

I knew I recognized his voice and paired with this material. It’s pretty awesome how he’s able to consistently put these mathematicians in check. From the micro to the macro. Because of him, I now believe that the universe being electrical is a matter of fact. Not just what I thought it might be as an electrician. I don’t know how much more time we have left, but I look forward to seeing more of his scientific findings rather than just math equations sold as proof of what unjust science. This man and his team of few I consider to be logical and honest with their science.

[@MrRollingstone66]

Thank you for thinking outside the 📦

[@arturama8581]

"I now believe that the universe being electrical is a matter of fact". Believe - fact. You see the problem now?

[@MrRollingstone66]

@@arturama8581 It’s my Truth so it’s my Fact. End of conversation bub.

[@Huuuuuuuuuuuu107]

@@MrRollingstone66 That's like saying i believe in Jesus so he's true. That's not how science works. If you believe in something all you can do is create a hypothesis.

[@MrRollingstone66]

@@Huuuuuuuuuuuu107 sorry pal, but it’s foolish to think you can control what others believe to be factual or true. Opinions vary and if you don’t like that, go hang with your friends. That message wasn’t meant for you anyhow. So mind your own and you’ll do fine.

[@hellavadeal]

I see no crisis , just a shift in knowledge. Cosmology has always been about exploration of what is out there. That is bound to change has we learn more of the unknown. Cosmology has always understood that there is more we do not know. I never believed the "Big Bang". We are so tiny in such a vast universe. Science must change with the information. Nothing in it should be dogma.

[@tonyb8660]

Lerner's humor is pretty good. the nuggets go by quickly, so pay attention lol

[@anilgupta88]

Excellent, logical and facts driven refutation of the Big Bang Theory. Can the cynics focus on challenging Eric’s points with counter arguments instead of taking cheap shots at his hair or sweater? I found Eric to be absolutely sincere in his presentation, without any flashy grandstanding, which is all we should expect from a real scientist even if we don’t agree with him or her.

[@arturama8581]

I'm not interested in his hair, nor his way of dressing. I'm not scientifically schooled enough to refute his arguments. I can understand his explanation, but that's it. A search on Lerner soon made clear that scientists fight over the Big Bang as well as several other theories. What almost all of his peers agree on, is that Lerner's theory is incorrect and if he would submit his work to peer reviewed scientific journals, it wouldn't end well. What I am schooled in enough though, is recognize persuasive speeking techniques. I haven't counted, but he uses the word 'crisis' an awful lot. To an extend I think he's doing it on purpose, to create a false feeling of thruth of there really being a 'crisis'. Then he combines it with plugging his books on the subject. So, I get suspicious. Cause, where is the 'Crisis'? If he's right, it only means a *Theory* needs to be reviewed and may be wrong. That's how theories work. You work with them as long as they seem to be right and you change them as new data show the theory is wrong. So where is the crisis? If he *proved* a LAW of physics to be wrong, thát would be a crisis, yes. But a theory being wrong? So what? That's why we call them theories in the first place, don't we?

[@JH-pt6ih]

@@arturama8581 Six months since your comment and I have to comment just to acknowledge someone thinking about something and looking into it for themselves. So many of these "they don't want you to know, but I've discovered the secret" charlatans repeat the same foolish claims that rely on people's intellectual laziness.

[@timothyblazer1749]

​​​@@arturama8581 he doesn't have to have a new theory in order to refute the old one. 2. His theory is not an attempt to describe the entire universe, but critics evaluate it as if it is and thus commit the very sin they are accused of. Plasma cosmology has already made a few dozen predictions that have come true ( deep impact, comet 67p, Jupiter and Saturn atmospheric details, details of sun activity, etc ) however the scientific establishment has pulled out every stop, including people like Kelley saying "funding experiments around alternative theories is a waste of time and money" with no evidence or track record to support it. They are ignoring evidence that refutes Lambda-CDM, and using political and economic tactics to prevent that evidence from becoming publicly distributed. Dr. Lerner is just one in a series of professionals who are in this boat. He is a successful plasma physicist, and is not only knowledgeable but also has a keen intellect. Read his book. I've been in physics since the 90s, and I consider him a top experimentalist. His work is extremely carefully done.

[@jamescaley9942]

That is the field of cosmology: they erect huge edifices of theory on the narrowest of empirical foundations.

[@user-hr8pz6lh5w]

Just look at it

[@JudoMateo]

Always have, maybe always will.

[@danweaver4304]

Phil Weatherley - “religion, that’s based on nothing”. Right. Except perhaps the historical veracity of biblical events described in the Christian holy book, the testimony of 2.5 Billion Christians, the abundant evidence for an apocalyptic event roughly 4500 years ago, which wiped out millions of species, and nearly wiped out humans, the incredible design of DNA running a complex micro-factory inside trillions of living cells and replicating itself with only a few errors passed on to the next generation, the statistical impossibility of random chance as a solution, and the fact that “theories” of Cosmology are based on little more than the imagination of some privileged handful of folks supported by taxes or the fortunes amassed by their ancestors. So you’re exactly right, Phil. Tell me something: when did you discover scientists were all wrong in their thinking about the BBT? How long will it be before someone else discovers you’re wrong?

[@stacylarge5636]

They will fall down upon them

[@jamestheotherone742]

@Phil Weatherley But religion has more practical application.

[@vcoonrod]

Brilliant. Time to correct errors so we have a true solid foundation. One wonders if the decay rate, being a probability distribution, isn't key as some would always not cancel at the same rate. This would produce two universes, one with matter and one with antimatter depending on which happened to be left over. Just thinking about what you said. Thank you.

[@waldwassermann]

"The origin of self is self not wanting to be by itself". - Wald Wassermann, Physicist

[@TheMercilessEye]

About time the idea of a Belgian priest was discarded.

[@MountainFisher]

At least Georges Henri Joseph Édouard Lemaître could do math. This buffoon dropped out less than a year after getting his Bachelors in physics. Said he wanted to do experiments, not maths. Whereas Peter Higgs figured out with a pen and paper doing maths that the Higgs Boson must exist. This Lerner buffoon teaches half truths to bogus nonsense for money. Don't forget to buy his latest book!

[@mekoeneko]

@@MountainFisher Mathematics is just an approximation of reality, not reality itself.

[@MountainFisher]

@@mekoeneko And? Do you mean that the maths won't show you how things work? They do, but this guy is mistaken in his views of how the Universe works. Why? Because he looks for anomalies and thinks that proves his point, but he cannot do the math so no one can replicate his results. I'm a bio-engineer and just doing biology you need some math and engineering is obviously mathematical. Don't do the exponential strengths of wind and your skyscraper or bridge fall down. Math is a very necessary part of reality. The old argument, did mankind invent math or did he discover it?

[@mekoeneko]

@@MountainFisher Of course mankind invented math. And you are right, it is an old argument, goes all the way back to Plato and Pythagoras and the ever raging dispute between Materialism and Idealism. Idealism is fundamentally an unscientific worldview that when all is said and done requires a believe in some sort of god. I am sure you have heard the phrase "everything is numbers", this is a common saying if idealists following the philosophy of Plato(often unwittingly). No, everything is not numbers. Mathematics is just a tool we can use to try to describe the universe. But it always is just a rough approximation. Newtonian theory of gravity is also an approximation and can make prediction only at certain scale. And even though some people believe Einstein's General Relativity is the "absolute truth" when it comes to gravity, even it is just an approximation that fails at certain scale.(that's why dark matter exists). Every theory and mathematical model is just an approximation of reality. Idealists have a backward worldview where they believe the "idea" or "math" if you will, is primary and reality has to fit into that. Lately there have even been some voices heard in the cosmology field where some people claim that their theories model do not have to be confirmed by observation, they just have to be "elegant" to be considered valid. This is a descent into idealism and is incompatible with science.

[@MountainFisher]

@@GwladYrHaf I hear some assertions, I don't hear proofs. I am no fan of the ad hoc nature of the Big Bang, but I have heard it up to here about the so called "Electric" Universe. It is falsified by gravity, but KZbin is filled with remnants of a debunked hypothesis. This guy might be a genius, but he's a crazy one. He never went on to get his Masters degree, claimed he didn't like their emphasis on math, but he dropped out(too hard I guess). Never completed his government grants to prove his assertions. Not one single thing did he prove, but he learned how to scam the government's science grant program. www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/lerner_errors.html

[@2Hesiod]

The inference from the red shift distance relation to the velocity distance relation is unwarranted nonsense.

[@williamwhittingham4785]

"Seeing Red", by Halton Arp... www.amazon.ca/Seeing-red-Redshifts-cosmology-academic/dp/0968368905

[@stacylarge5636]

Agreed thought I was crazy they did HA HA HA....resistance is futile

[@lawrencemiller3829]

The red shift may be due to light losing energy, which makes sense that the further and dimmer the stars, the redder the shift. I doubt the universe is expanding as predicted based on the red shift.

[@kennethaxe218]

The difference between science fact and fiction on the theoretical front is impossible to reason , which is why falling back on experimental test results is the litmus test to determine what you have on your hands. The big bang looks like science fiction especially when the universe is 'wound back' to a sub-microscopic origin. The increasing red shift of galaxies, giving rise to more 'dark' science fiction, is indicative of a pulsating (not merely inflating) universe. In ageement with the old saying 'what goes up must come down' I predict that the present red shift will be replaced by a blue shifting perod of observations as the universe returns to its previous size. At its origin it was never a super hot,dense singularity. I believe the great nebular 'clouds' of pure hydrogen (or constituents there of) rolled into existence like mist on the sea at the creation. If this pulsating behaviour(Winnie's Wave) proves to be correct then previous guestimates of the age of the universe will need reconsideration. Observations of the motion of a mass suspended on a spring when displaced from its rest equilibrium(Hooke's Law) is the analogous system which I derived this idea from. I believe it is a more realistic explanation of spectroscopic observations.The battle between gravitational attraction and radiation pressure constituting the 'spring.' The Lord never jerry built anything!

[@jelink22]

@David Coker Would you like to point to the Periodic Table and tell us where you think the missing elements might be?

[@mjhzen8313]

I bought Mr. Lerner's book many years ago, and, though I'm not talented enough in physics to understand it all, I found it a great read. I would recommend it to anyone interested in this subject. I am ecstatic to have found this video here, and to be able to see him lecture for the first time. I will be watching all of his videos.

[@paulmillard1130]

Not too long ago the same people would tell you the Earth is the center of the Solar System , now it's Bang Theory and it's also wrong.

[@davidbgreensmith]

Yet the evidence backs it up.

[@saranjoel]

is anyone watching this after findings of James webb Telescope which is supporting that BB Theory might never happen

[@buzzy-ears]

That sweater looks like a hug from a puppy angel made of clouds.

[@LPPFusion]

Thanks! Hand knit long ago. Kept me warm through many a snow storm.

[@RumiSupertramp]

That sweater is the only proof that actually validates the Big Bang :p

[@alpha7B5]

There was a time in my life, after I finished high school somewhere at the beginning of 1990's, when I had to make a decision and chose a direction of my further education (and with that more or less my further professional path as well ...). For me there were two options at the time, both most preferable for me personally, Faculty of Electr(otechn)ical Engineering or Faculty of physics (and mathematics), both part of University Ljubljana, Slovenia. Although I had attended open days events for new students at both faculties that spring back in 1992, I finally decided for EE. However, it was quite tough decision to make, and I am pretty much sure - if it was for Eric J. Lerner who performed the laser holography experiment at Faculty of Physics open days, I would certainly decide differently. ;-) Greetings to Boston!

[@dicktracy1324]

alpha7B5 Slovenia is a beautiful country, I love all ex Yugoslav states

[@christopherbird4870]

@111111 33 When you make a claim eg. "the universe is electric" you MUST present evidence. Basic science.

[@christopherbird4870]

" - if it was for Eric J. Lerner who performed the laser holography experiment at Faculty of Physics open days, I would certainly decide differently" . I am not sure what this means. Could you say it another way please?

[@colto2312]

@111111 33 Our very DNA is a three dimensional electromagnetic dual phase wave form made material. We're only at the precipice of our understanding.

[@colto2312]

@@christopherbird4870 According to your paridigm bees don't fly and trees can't be taller than 50 ft.

[@progrmr]

Im pretty much a dummy compared to scientists like this and I only get a bit of the material but I get just enough to be fascinated. Great video and very thought provoking.

[@curtdenson2360]

So this is how the AL AND Gretta shit show works using NASA, NOA send money lots of money, so we' ALL don't die in yet again, another 10 years, garbage in garbage out send more money, after all, we are science-based? gee WHAT COULD GO WRONG.

[@lisamariemiller5]

Love it when dogma is in fact shown to be theory at best well done.

[@rabokarabekian409]

gee wiz, u so smert, but, hey, wait = scientific theory noun A coherent group of propositions formulated to explain a group of facts or phenomena in the natural world and repeatedly confirmed through experiment or observation.

[@johnlawrence2757]

Rabo Karabekian proper science records observations for which there is at a given time no accepted explanation. At a given point in time a consensus emerges that a particular explanation of a set of observations over time has reached a convincing level and it becomes adopted as a theory. In this way science can proceed with interactions dependent on the theory even though it hasn’t obtained the status of a scientific fact. The problem with the theory of “evolution” is that the “theory” came first. There were hardly any sets of observed data which could allow of such a theory at that time and Darwin himself was extremely vague about what his observed data involved - his aims in fact were extremely basic and unambitious,, simply correlating flora and fauna into types and variations.This was indeed a major undertaking logistically but not particularly significant scientifically So with evolutionary biology an egg/chicken situation developed which very quickly got out of hand. In particular what constituted acceptable levels of confirmed observations were ridden roughshod over and by-passed in ways which would not have been possible in the usual procedures of scientific research. The other big problem was the capacity of evolutionary biologists to ignore observation and data which actually contradicted the basis of the theory - due again to it having already been formulated. This also could not occur in properly conducted research where all data and observation would be assimilated and would influence the ultimate form of The theory

[@cnault3244]

"Love it when dogma is in fact shown to be theory at best" And in book form, rather than the old tried & true submitting it for peer review so someone with a higher degree than a BA in physics could review it.

[@michaelh1832]

John Lawrence I can not claim to be able to fully decipher your extremely vague word salad; however, evolution happens. The theory that explains evolution, that Darwin expounded on, is natural selection, for which there is clear and convincing evidence.

[@markdal49]

Maybe you should ask prof John Ionnides about peer review...and how 'useful' it is.....

[@Mr.BVogel]

Great talk! We seem to be impeding our own speed of progress immensely.. There has been an irony going on in some of the sciences.

[@keithjones3481]

This is totally awesome. Evidence-based, standing up to misguided mainstream thinking takes courage. I was thinking there must be something I wasn't understanding with all these brilliant cosmologists supporting these theories despite the huge gapping holes. Although I have a science background, I am not a physicist. So I have been thinking I must be one dumb shit. I feel so much better now lol. The matter/anti-matter asymmetry and proton decay discussion is music to my ears. Can't wait to hear what you say about Dark Matter and Dark Energy. Well done mate. Consider me subscribed.

[@arturama8581]

So, if someone says what you think, he's right and if someone says something else he's wrong? Some scientist! I think you were right the first time: "I must be one dumb shit".

[@khanusmagnus577]

@@arturama8581 big bang never happened fed, cope harder.

[@NICEFINENEWROBOT]

@@arturama8581 Loud and proud.

[@lennonzamora5387]

​@@arturama8581 your entirely ad-hominem response does nothing to help your case. What precisely is your case anyway? Do you have one?

[@JesusMartinez-mk6fc]

This knitted sweater proves that superstring theory is real. Look at those six-dimentional Calabi-Yau manifolds all over it. :D

[@michaeladrian2210]

Actually it is an Irish jumper

[@michaeladrian2210]

No one has proven no start to big bang....but

[@danielgoodwin7679]

I would proudly sport that jumper

[@phillipchambers6055]

Bwahahahaha

[@utubewatcher806]

@@michaeladrian2210 sure it's not an Irish Big Bang sweater?

[@degrelleholt6314]

That was wonderfully understandable presentation. Thank you.

[@dystopiandissident4793]

I would love to hear this man speak about quantum entanglement

[@ro4eva]

As inconvenient as it may be to the careers of some, the fact of the matter is that Mr. Lerner has good reason to question the 'Big Bang' model.

[@ro4eva]

P.S: That doesn't necessarily mean that I think his alternate/substituted proposal is correct. All I'm saying is that he brings up some valid points when discussing the 'Big Bang' model.

[@DerMig590]

How can I get a high quality copy of your documentary "Big Bang Never Happened"? I watched it on KZbin at low resolution.

[@lindsayforbes7370]

Eric, great challenge to the theories of cosmology. Next one soon please 👍

[@GregJay]

I love this guy! The Cosmology quest is one of my favorite videos I was introduced to him and Halton Arp there, Dr. Lerner is right on point and hilarious in it, all they can do is suppress it, what I like about him most is that he is intellectually honest, not very many are, if you haven't seen it you should for me it is a must see, both parts are very important,because although they never come out and say it that video exposes mainstream big bang math driven Einsteinian physics cosmology to be the fraud that it is and the gatekeepers are malevolent to any and all challengers. Yes prediction is the key this was a sobering thought brought up by Immanuel Velikovsky Mainstream big bang cosmology does not have 1 successful prediction in it's history, not 1! Bode's law was wrong it missed by 3/4 of a billion miles

[@grraadd]

I guess, when you deal with a government funded industry you have to be very careful what you say...

[@lakermangmx]

Lerner's ideas have been rejected by the professional physicists and cosmologists who have reviewed them. In these critiques, critics have explained that, contrary to Lerner's assertions, the size of superclusters is a feature limited by subsequent observations to the end of greatness and is consistent with having arisen from a power spectrum of density fluctuations growing from the quantum fluctuations predicted in inflationary models.[25][26][27] Anisotropies were discovered in subsequent analysis of the both COBE and BOOMERanG experiments and were more fully characterized by the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe[25][26] and Planck.

[@lakermangmx]

@@grraadd he is so supressed he has published a book on it.

[@Simonet1309]

Well there’s definately a crisis in coiffeurology.

[@imnotabotrlyimnot]

He wears his wig like most college guys wear their underwear, til they fall off.

[@lauraarcher6996]

😂👍

[@caryd67]

No, that’s the standard Big Brain hairstyle

[@AdamosDad]

Shear it and knit a new sweater.

[@billygoat520]

A "look" like that must be worked at. It is not an accident.

[@MoMoMyPup10]

Disclaimer: *not a scientist* but I always found it curious that one could believe that some (somewhat large) cosmic belch could produce an uncountable number of *very large* round objects that continue to burn hellaciously for some 14+ BILLION years.

[@MrGonzonator]

Go become a scientist. Your uneducated theories are pretty much meaningless.

[@anonymoushuman8344]

This is an intriguing possibility to think about, whether you share the conclusion or not. What if basic premises of modern cosmology are false? What if it's all wrong? It's good to be aware of just how much we accept on authority and to question that authority. Science proper doesn't consist in simply taking received conclusions on faith and thinking within limits prescribed by them. Nor does it consist in simply rejecting received conclusions. Question everything in a disciplined way and stay open to the possibility of being radically mistaken.

[@skyrangerbob]

The assumption is that the ONLY way to get a red shift is the Doppler Effect.

[@thephuntastics2920]

And thats one of the 5 major flaws.

[@dementare]

I'm glad that, although slowly, people are starting become more aware of these assumptions. That's been my biggest problem with these "crazy" astronomical theories. They are decent and good theories, but when they communicate these theories they *NEVER* openly explain the *ASSUMPTIONS* they make, they present them as if it is a *FACT* .... and it's *NOT* .

[@pmazie]

I have not been in school for more years than I care to admit but the Doppler Effect had something to do with sound traveling though air. What air is the light in space hitting? if only the air in our atmosphere then how can it be an indicator of distance? Or am I all wet as usual?

[@sallylauper8222]

@@pmazie As I understand it, the Doppler Effect has nothing to do with air and applies to all frequencies, not just sound. A frequency is stretched or compressed in proportion to the speed of it's approach or departure.

[@MichaelNNY]

@@sallylauper8222 Question: can light be redshifted by rotation rather than expansion? In other words, say the universe is a big fat torus that is spinning. Would we, as part of that structure, see redshifting of objects within the structure?

[@Makotonine]

once upon a time there was nothing, which exploded!

[@grandpaobvious]

You're wrong on two counts: It wasn't nothing, and it didn't explode.

[@filiusvivam4315]

@@grandpaobvious oh sweet irony

[@Orvect]

"Once upon a time" Stop right there, no. Time and space didn't exist, wrap your human mind around that, good luck, bye.

[@Orvect]

@David Coker there is so much projection in that comment, love it.

[@petepeter1857]

@David Coker Why u mad, bruh?

[@RCassinello]

I know very little about astrophyics and cosmology, but when we have to invent an invisible type of energy and matter that most of the universe is made from to explain why our observations are wrong, I respectfully suggest that perhaps it's the theory that is wrong and not the observations.

[@arthurhunt642]

This guy is wrong. All major Physicists and major universities explain this guy's errors. He sells books... lots of them. He has been debunked from all corners of his profession.

[@StrategicGamesEtc]

@@arthurhunt642 Do you have a link to someone who debunks this position and argues for the Big Bang Theory? I've been trying to find one since my gut says that even if the details of the Big Bang aren't perfectly known, the basic premise is correct, but I must be using poor keywords.

[@ancientonezero]

@@StrategicGamesEtc www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/lerner_errors.html

[@The_CrackedPot_Christian]

I would be more interested in those experts explaining why the predictions of BB are so inaccurate , useless essentially, than any 'Debunking' of this guy. It's not his job to prove he's right, but the job of expert physicists to come up with a theory that predicts with accuracy the observations. His assertion BB never happened stands until they can come up with a theory that is excellent at predictions. Grade F

[@stevefeldman6486]

The most compelling argument you bring up, to me, is our universes lack of antimatter. The idea that somehow there was a smidgen more matter than antimatter at the beginning (without any real explanation), resulting in our matter filled universe, has always seemed somewhat crazy to me. To suggest that all the matter we observe in the universe is just the infinitesimal remnants from mutual destruction seems absurd, but is the most widely accepted theory among cosmologists. As a layman, I must rely on information from those who are working in the fields of science that are best suited to provide plausible theories. What you present is compelling food for thought! I can't simply dismiss everything I've learned, even though parts of my understanding don't sit right with common sense. If all of your assertions prove correct, then the rubbish we've been fed for several decades is criminal! Thank you for giving me cause to further scrutinize accepted theories that I've already taken issue with. :) Great talk! I look forward to hearing more.

[@FFE-js2zp]

It’s painful to watch intelligent people discuss measured density in support of a “theory” requiring infinite density.

[@ianedmonds9191]

I'm 7:30 in and I've not heard even a gist of what your alternative is?

[@PhillipCummingsUSA]

Take some Ritalin and pay attention

[@rocksandoil2241]

Models are theories, so attempting to say something is "settled science" on the basis of a model or theory, is by definition wrong.

[@telumatramenti7250]

Nope. Word "theory" is interchangeable with "fact" in science. Which is not to be confused with LAY definition of the word "theory". Lay definition of "theory" is "a guess" or "a hypothesis". Not in science. Logic of Hypothesis Testing in Science dictates that one doesn't seek proof but rather subjects a hypothesis to multiple falsification attempts. This is how Subjective Validation/Confirmation Bias is excised. In science a hypothesis only becomes a theory if it resists multiple, rigorous attempts at falsification. A model can refer to either a theory or a hypothesis. A model only becomes a theoretical (rather than hypothetical) model, - if its predictions are confirmed and data corresponds to predicted data of the model. What irritates me most is frivolous use of the word "theory"in popular science documentaries. It's one of the main reasons lay people are confused and support Evolution and Anthropogenic Global Warming Denialism, all the way down to doubting the Earth is a rotational ellipsoid and calling ISS and the idea of space travel itself "fake". The video above is pretty much case in point. "Big Bang Theory is wrong, and I don't have a better theory that is actually supported by observations, but I'll still act like I'm more objective than the entire fields of Cosmology and Astrophysics"

[@scipioafricanus5871]

@@telumatramenti7250 Yes! It is the grating arrogance of Eric Lerner that really irks me. "Big Bang Theory is wrong, and I don't have a better theory that is actually supported by observations, but I'll still act like I'm more objective than the entire fields of Cosmology and Astrophysics"

[@Mrch33ky]

Great intro. Looking forward to the series.

[@trace-mark]

As a life long observer of nature I simply don't believe the big bang theory. Thank you.

[@mdarrenu]

I don't have theories on cosmology - but I do have theories on cosmologists. First theory, when they put on a sweater in grad school - they never take if off. You can directly measure the age of the cosmologist but the deterioration of the wool fibers. Second, you can predict the range of weight of the cosmologist based on the differential size of the fiber dues to stretching over the years. Luckily, these measures can be 100% since the sweater has never been washed.

[@Mikey-mike]

The most compelling evidence against a big bang is the high entropy of the horizon radiation. Roger Penrose points this fact out and it seems that contemporary cosmologists overlook this fact.

[@H33t3Speaks]

Indeed, because most “scientists” are little more than mathematically talented priests.

[@Mikey-mike]

@Pat Mahon Yes, same here.

[@H33t3Speaks]

Pat Mahon Very true, their Mathematical paucity is typically embarrassing.

[@sajateacher]

Penrose is on another level entirely.

[@leslawrenson]

The problem with the current cosmology is that it places gravity at the heart of every process in the Universe and completely marginalises the role of electricity.

[@stacylarge5636]

Gravity who...? lol

[@leslawrenson]

@@stacylarge5636 Lolz!

[@Huuuuuuuuuuuu107]

What is this obsession with electricity

[@davidjenkins5962]

The Cosmos is in crisis...! OMG! We have to...! Oh, wait, the Cosmos is just fine. It's a bunch of people with giant egos who think they'll someday "figure it all out" (LOL!) who are in crisis because their model broke (again!). Nevermind.

[@adambecker3482]

Learn to read. Or learn to listen. Whatever.

[@carlsitler9071]

Bingo. Though some were paid to lie.

[@davidjenkins5962]

@@a.wadderphiltyr1559 Technically, yes, but as you know (?) "...ological" is also used to mean the thing being studied. For example, here bit.ly/3cInqDe we have the term "Biological Attack", but I don't think they're saying that the study of life, i.e., Biology, is attacking something.

[@unarammer2003]

the spinning water ball earth is broke because the earth is flat and that's a fact!!

[@Longtack55]

Yeah, those scientists and their delicate egos. I guess we should just stop thinking about "stuff" and keep electing Donald Dunces to lead us so we can unnerstan dem when dey tawk 2 uz? My cousin made a discovery relating to Black Holes nearly 60 years ago, and guess what? It has not been successfully challenged but if/when it is overturned he couldn't give a shit. It's Science. Now you can tell me why the Theory (just a theory) of Gravity is so flawed and explain why thangs go down.

[@markkar4663]

The universe is electrodynamic not gravitational. The dogma of this paradigm is religious, the high priests of the standard model can never admit einstein was wrong because the money is really good.

[@yeetman4953]

lol its not

[@markkar4663]

@@yeetman4953 oh well damn, that's convincing. Except everything is pretty much connected electrically sooooo yeah.

[@ianw5439]

@@markkar4663 _"Except everything is pretty much connected electrically sooooo yeah."_ No it isn't. Care to name the peer-reviewed paper/s that back up your word salad?

If this is our biggest crisis I think we will be okay.

[@runs_through_the_forest]

thank you Eric, its very pleasant to listen to you.. i'm happy you are doing this, books don't reach the masses and the younger people like they used to do...

[@jameseverett4976]

My first impulse in beginning to watch this was to quickly scan the comments for hair editorials. And I was amply rewarded with more than I could have anticipated. Now that we have the important things under wraps, I can see what he has to say about the big bang.

[@haimbenavraham1502]

Thank you sir, you are making more sense than the present day quandary we find ourselves in.

[@pablorivera376]

The big bang hypothesis is the obscurantism of modern times.

[@skipintroux4444]

I don’t think so, most of these people believe the science they peddle - I recall one of the people above Halton Arp once wrote on one of his papers as rejection: “this exceeds my imagination”. Their own hubris does not allow them to entertain the thought that the dogma they have believed their whole lives cannot be true. Big bang theory is more like the science of epicycles, but this time there is no church to guide them into the acceptance that their dogma is wrong.

[@Bloodsaberxy]

Good thing is that plasma cosmology corrects all of these mistakes. What now needs to be corrected are astronomers and physicists working on NASA data analysis and these badly reviewed papers is to take courses in classical and quantum mechanics, electromagnetic fields, plasma, nuclear physics and chemistry before even touching anything. It is too bad that the information age gave us only calculators and not thinkers. Well, time will tell what happens later.. for now they are professional photographers and data gatherers, nothing more.

[@williamwhittingham4785]

Amazing how kemptness often in inverse proportion to degree of lucidity...

[@Longtack55]

@David Coker "Unkempt" = "untidy in appearance" making a reference to his wild hair and 70s sweater. Low kemptness inversely proportioned to (high) clarity. This means the scruffier the person, the more he is able to articulate his ideas. The conclusion is crap/unscientific but amusing. WW has made an assertion which is not unintelligible to a product of the 60-70s education.

[@joshleenall]

@David Coker "Poser fail" because your vocabulary is too simple to understand what he meant? How about you're just a moron. Yeah, let's go with that. I mean, what he said really isn't difficult at all to understand. Reading books is a fantastic thing for people with poor vocabularies to benefit from, FYI.

[@dystopiandissident4793]

Any scientific Nobel Prize winner can be used as evidence of your statement. Have you ever seen Albert Einstein? What a brilliant mess.

[@brettess52]

So let me see if I can understand. After some few thousand years of scientific endeavour, we now know less than we did when we began.

[@BlacksmithTWD]

I don't think we know less, but we sure have a lot more questions.

[@stephenburnage7687]

We don't even know what's under the earth's crust or how the moon got there.

[@pigknickers2975]

In some ways know no more than ancient religious texts.

[@anatomicallymodernhuman5175]

We know much more. It’s just that some of it is wrong.

[@richardmasters8424]

Whatever - I’m sure in 200 years time they’ll look back at some of our theories now and laugh.

[@sandmanbub]

Do you really think someone will be able to do that after the magnetic poles flip and the Earth's 6 mile thick crust shifts like it's done about every 6,000 years? We are overdue and the poles migration have accelerated.

[@christopherbird4870]

@@sandmanbub If you are implying these events would destroy humanity, why did that not occur 6,000 years ago? Or 12,000yrs? Or at any other previous time?

[@christopherbird4870]

@Donald Piniach These are just claims and statements. What point are you trying to make?

[@Captain_Nemo-y7q]

I doubt whether civilisation will exist in 200 years time, but if it does, it will be too concerned with surviving to care about this.

[@jameseverett4976]

Don't rub it in Richard. Look how many people you forced to question the idea that they know basically everything important there is to know.

[@MBison-im2qy]

Basically, they can't conceive of how the universe began so they just said "it exploded out of nothing" and brainwash with that hypothesis until it becomes accepted as veritable fact.

[@paxwallacejazz]

The next bang happens when the entropy or expansion of our universe increases to the point where the fail safe that keeps our Brane from bumping into another Brane (that's the structural function of black holes) ceases to function boom recycle time . So our gravity outside in 11dimensional hyperspace functions like Alan Guth's repulsive gravity.

[@dmeemd7787]

Hmmmm possibly so...been back and forth with that

[@paxwallacejazz]

@@dmeemd7787 really? Cool

[@ljthesmartandscientiststro7741]

Would mean that multiverse

[@gristlevonraben]

This is awesome! I look forward to more videos!

[@daemonnice]

The idea that a proton never decays lends itself to the notion of an infinite universe. This matter/antimatter thing I have difficulty accepting. I do not doubt they are observing some symmetry in the lab that isn't present in the universe, but, perhaps what they are seeing in the lab is being misinterpreted. There is symmetry in the universe in the sense of charge where q+ is divergent and q- is convergent. To me it is a question of logic. If you are not seeing the antimatter/matter symmetry in the universe that you think you see in the lab, then perhaps what you see in the lab is not matter/antimatter but something else. Overall an excellent video.

[@seanjoseph8637]

When did Steve Tyler become a scientist? Very interesting, very thought provoking video.

[@RumiSupertramp]

Lol that's what i thought too when i first saw him, when did Aerosmith get into astrophysics???

[@maxuniverse2985]

"The Big-Bang Never Happened. Eric Lerner, No Dark Matter, No Black Hole. Eric Lerner," Thank you Eric Lerner. Because your theory is correct.

[@acetate909]

I was hoping this was going to be a Mandela effect video where we all remembered a show called _The Static Universe Theory_ on NBC.

[@annetteku1]

When two High energy photons colide, they produce a matter-antimatter pair... when three of the same kind of protons colide, what happens then? Maybe you addres that later, but it poped into my mind, as I tried to imagine that High temperature, High density situation you describe. Thank you for making videos about science. I am allways hungry for more understanding of cosmos😀👍

[@Albachiel]

I worked on fusion thirty five years ago for a number of years as an engineer on robotics and tiling the TORUS . I was standing pondering what a wonderful creation the TORUS was, when one of the physicist’s asked what was on my mind. I asked how difficult was this experiment, he replied. If I stand at the top of the Sahara and you stand at the bottom and then we walk to meet each other to meet exactly in the middle. Oh, he then exclaimed, I forgot, the light will go out when we’re walking! Now it’s all the rage again, it’s as far away as Alpha Centauri from what I’ve witnessed and the point! it’s the usual, cross my palm with silver and Uncle John’s snake oil will salve all your problems.

[@brendawilliams8062]

I was wondering how the torus played out. I appreciate your remark. I guess the real world only really has so much room.

[@GlobalResistanceCoalition]

The inhabitants of this Adobe of time and space have a quite finite perception of the cosmos. Such silly little creatures

[@barryrudolph9542]

For the inhabitants of this puny speck everything must have a beginning and an end. They are likely to be wrong when it comes to the Universe but don't tell that to their Scientists because on this puny speck Scientists are right fighters.

[@psycronizer]

I think you meant Abode of time and space, Adobe is something a little different, lol....

[@kenwebster5053]

I have a question. If the mass of older stars is higher than expected but light elements H & He are proportionately much lower than expected while Li is proportionately about right but heavier elements are practically absent (as a measure of age, you have excluded their existence form the sample stars), then you have a great unaccounted mass in these older stars that is neither heavy nor light matter. So what is this remaining huge unaccounted mass?

[@nikjs]

Hold your fact-checking horses Twitter and Facebook, he's not saying the TV show never happened.