The Recording King vs. Martin Question!

[@johnathanutahzio8474]

This guy is a treasure to the guitar community. Best sub I e made in the last ten years.

[@MisterNiles]

I just subscribed, and I am feeling the same thing. He's also a person who knows the beauty of Yamaha. It's lonely out here these days. I've not had the pleasure of playing the fine, handmade Yamaha's that he has, but my FG from the 90s is wonderful. I walked into a vintage guitar store in DC with 3k in my pocket but only spent $350 and walked away with "my" guitar. It wonderful. I'm at the point where I believe my playing justifies a bit of an upgrade though, and I also want a nice pickup system. So I'm going to try and get an FGX5. Hopefully JP and I will get to be good friends and he'll mail me L models to borrow for a few months at a time :) Seriously though, I really am glad I found him. America is indeed depressing these days, and lately I've lost interest in the things I really love. JP is making me feel that excitement again. That's a great gift.

[@fredboesing7907]

I coutour

[@luisg.martinezmarti7838]

Just FYI, you mention at the 10:55 mark that the Alvarez you reviewed in the Nov. 2, 2019 video comparison to the Martin has laminate B/S. That is not correct. The Alvarez MD60EBG is an all solid guitar (which you mentioned in that video). The Alvarez is all solid just like this Record King (although sitka/mahogany instead of adirondack/rosewood). It also retails for less than the RD-328. Also, I do not think Robin Boucher invented torrefaction unless he's a viking. The process is attributed to Vikings who used torrefied wood to build their ships to keep moisture out, and make them lighter and faster. The Finnish luthier Juha Ruokangas was the first to use the process to make guitars, he made his electric guitars with torrefied wood in the 90's.

[@brunoottens3445]

I would love to see a comparison between de Alvarez and Recording King!!!

[@sunnyray7819]

Me too, Md70bg vs. Rd 238..

[@toneseeker4968]

I just recently discovered you and your channel, J.P., and I am binging your videos. I have been playing for 40 years...nowhere as good as you, but to my audience, friends, and family...they are amazed. I just want to say I love you, Brother! You speak my language; and we're definitely kindred spirits. Long live your channel! Btw, representing Houston, Tx...

[@tylerhenderson4244]

The Alvarez you used in the last test does have solid back and sides. It’s part of their Master Works series which are all solid.

[@ClaytonWillisMusic]

That's what I had thought. Thank you.

[@phlipbs]

The first sounds new and focused (the Recording King); the second sounds more aged (the Martin). They both sound great in your hands, JP!

[@hobbyjohnny]

I am going to say #1 was Martin. So glad I discovered your channel. You have been a breath of fresh air during the lockdown. Hope you can get back on the road soon, but that would mean we won't get the enjoy your talent on YT.

[@sununtaschnittker6469]

You are fun to watch and I always learn stuff, highest compliment I can make!

[@scottsozmtns7534]

I bought a Bourgeois Vintage D several yrs back w/serial #-under 3,000. Love it! Traded my Beard Resonator (Dobro), which became the Jerry Douglas model for it straight across, & glad I did! I’ve tried to teach my oldest son how to play & wanted to get him a quality box at a fair price. I chose Recording King after reading the woods, bracing & tone then sought to get my boy one. His was mahogany sides & back and the sound blew me away! I then bought one for myself that had rosewood sides & back w/Adirondack spruce top & when I get a guitar out to jam or show my son a lick or 2, I reach for my Recording King & leave my Bourgeois in the case so it’s only played when w/serious players & keeps it unblemished and it’s value intact. I love my Recording King guitar & I’ve been playing since age 9, so it’s been 40-years and I’ve played a few boxes in my time. Great video!

[@russellhowemusic2578]

2nd sounds like a martin. Tighter, and less ringing. First sounds new, bright and clear. I'm unbiased. Love my Yamaha LL16. $900

[@glouismusic]

Love all my yamaha’s ❤️

[@papawrichard3553]

Love my FG-300 red label!❤️

[@terminalergeistesklarer1182]

22:07 Guitar1 23:06 Guitar2 For me is the aged well ballanced sample 2 the Martin. But i will buy the Recording King + new wooden pins + new strings + L.R. Baggs M80! 😛

[@LesGuitaresBoucher]

Great video JP! It will be interesting to see everyone’s answers. We will watch your next video for the answer! Thank you!

[@warnerconstruction4806]

Would love to hear your take on the inspired by gibson humming bird

[@Southernguitar74]

There is a definite difference in these 2 guitars. The first was much brighter, and the second much warmer and full. I say #1 is Recording King, and #2 is Martin...Either way, #2 sounded quite a bit better to my ears, for what it's worth. Neither sounded bad, but #2 was the winner, and I'm guessing it's the Martin. I hope I'm wrong! Lol

[@lilycat1694]

I displease the crown I agree.

[@johntarman3234]

I actually liked the brighter almost brassy tone of the Recording King, though it would mello over time.

[@jazzlehazzle]

Mainly bc the RK is a brand-new guitar, and "quite a bit" is a strong term to me, especially not "quite a bit" = "5000 by-god dollars."

[@gammaraygem]

I think you are right, but I would choose the nr 1. I like the bright trebles, though they may mellow over time,as a commenter said. I own a Eastman E20D TC, chinese handbuilt all solid D28 copy. Awesome guitar. 2000 bucks though... Thing is, uless you actually can compare them on site (in shop) it is hard to know. I tried a range of Eastmans from 600 Euro upwards and they all sounded very good, but you could still hear why the expensive ones were...more expensive. I just found this channel and subbed.

[@Southernguitar74]

@@jazzlehazzle quite a bit may sound strong to your ears, but to my ears there was no comparison. The Martin blew the RK away, and I posted this comment the same day this was uploaded, before the answer was revealed. Listening again much later, I agree with and stand by my statement, and then some. I don’t care for the RK at all. Funny, I hardly remember this comparison. That’s how much of an impression the RK made. LOL

[@begraz]

I say #1 was the Recording King, it was definitely a brighter tone [which I prefer]. In fact IMHO I have NEVER owned a Martin, because I've always felt they were/are too mellow/warm... and acoustic guitar has always struggled to get in the mix, and again in my opinion that is part of the reason. A brighter guitar not only has more presence, but cuts thru better too.

[@D60Larrivee]

I'm going with guitar number 2. It sounded a little "bassier" to me and not as much sustain in treble range. Can't wait to hear the results.

[@Tizz_Eye]

I just bought a blueridge ❤️. The first new guitar I have bought. I always bought used and slightly increased the quality over the last 4 years since I started. I could have brought a martin. But I couldn't justify the price compared to the blueridge. I looooveee guitar and I love you too bud. Thanks. I'm so glad I stumbled across this.

[@YouTubeIsATerribleMedium]

Which one did you get and how do you like it?

[@warnerconstruction4806]

Couldn't have said it any better my self !

[@lilycat1694]

#2 was my choice, and I think it is the Martin! I would be very surprised if # 2 is the Recording King.

[@Jeffrey.T]

I found your channel a few weeks ago, while researching my next guitar purchase. After viewing your previous comparison video, I found an Alvarez MD60EBG (I need the electronics) at my local dealer. After playing it, I brought it home. I’d still love to get a Martin D-18 or a D-28. I’d be real curious about putting the Alvarez and the Recording King up against a new Martin. The Aged, played in sound was obvious in this video for those who know what to listen for, but I have to say, that Recording King sure held its own and 1/4 the price. I own a 1970’s Sigma DR-7, made by Martin in Japan. I can’t tell it apart from a D-28 based on sound alone. Those are another bang for your buck purchase if you find them.

[@raymondbruce7175]

I don't know if Canada considers this man a national treasure but Scotland loves him. (Especially Shetland )

[@stomique]

I like the second one. I really hope it is the Recording King. I work with M. George here in Fredericton and we are talking with Guillaume about representing them.

[@JPCormier]

Troy McLaggan you cant go wrong with recording king. They’re incredible instruments for the money.

[@ColinFowlie]

If you do, I'll definitely refer any of my guitar-shopping friends your way to check them out.

[@pdonnelly600]

I own the Alvarez MD60EBG and this Recording King RD-328 and love both. The Alvarez has warmer sound. The Recording King is a Canon and sounds great. They are different sounding with different necks. They are both great value guitars at around $750 you cant so wrong. Thanks, JP, for doing these reviews and helping me with my decision.

[@DarrenForbes]

I like the sound of #2. Can’t wait to see which one I actually like.

[@jamesconley9376]

I have a 2016 Recording King ROS-10/000 12 fret, with elixir lite strings. Sweet little guitar, solid top/ back/side-built well, perfect intonation and resonance. Great for finger picking my favorite songwriter's music (John Prine).

[@HayesTech]

Lol... Last comment, I promise. I wanted to mention that the Pickguard started coming off of mine and I ended up taking it off completely. But after a year and a half, nothing broke or cracked and it's sounding great. I can highly recommend them.

[@richadams7121]

From one OLD martin player to another, one who is still picking on Martin, I'd have to say the second piece was played on the Clearance White model Martin because of the warmth of the mid -range and the sustained tone. The Recording King is super clear on the top like a Rosewood guitar box should sound! Sounds REALL good!

[@Bigoak66]

I would assume the 2nd is the Martin and would be happy to know that it is the Recording King. Great video.

[@sunnyray7819]

I can tell what one sounds new but to be honest, once that RD-328 opens up and dries out a little, it might be be harder to hear the difference. I have had many cheap acoustics go through my hands and I can tell the difference in a solid guitar. But even a decent cheap solid top can be a great guitar. I have a Blueridge BR60, Solid Sitka with Laminate Rosewood, and it's a rhythm monster. Loud. And at the Bluegrass jam I had several people ask what it was and liked the sound. I say partially some of that is experience but also definitely the guitar. But the neck is screwed up and I adjusted it several times. It got worse to where I had to actually make the strings higher. Over several months it just got worse. Not my first time adjusting guitars either. I decided to put it in slack key tuning (open G) and it relaxed the neck a little more. But that was my Bluegrass jam guitar. I have been without a good jam guitar for a while now. I have a decent Yamaha solid top but it's not something I think can hang with the Banjo and Mandolin. I finally got the money together to order Recording King RD-328. I can't wait. Hopefully it's similar to my Blueridge but a little better. I don't think it could possibly be louder to be honest but if it's the same, I will be thrilled. I do play on the point of as hard as I can usually so I can't say for sure but I think the Blueridge was louder than all the Martins. I was louder anyways. I had to kinda ease back sometimes. But this should be a great guitar. 11 days till arrival..

[@davidlawrence327]

For another REMARKABLE "bang for the buck" comparison, I'd love to see you A/B the RD-T16, with the torrified Addy top, with your Martin. I got mine used for $325.00- even more amazing, when you consider the massive difference in price.

[@Sherpa38]

Hi JP, if one day you can have both in your hands, is it possible to compare the RK RD316 with a D18? I have the recording king nRD-316 for 5 years, I find it superb, but I have not, and I may never have, the opportunity to test a Martin, and since they have the same specs, I would be happy to hear the difference (in brand and price!) Thanks to you!

[@eddieman42]

Yes, exactly.. Build them like they used to.. Great video jp. Will check it the recording king guitars for sure. The 18 model... Thanks buddy, great show

[@tjdonaldson6923]

Im so glad i found JP and this channel. Jp has a great personality and some videos are so funny. I love you too JP. Thanks man 👍

[@agoogleuser7832]

It's almost obvious that #2 is the Martin and #1 is the Recording King. The wood on #2 sounds warmer and a little punchier but the ringing bell like tone on #1 sounds exactly what I'm looking for while I own other darker sounding guitars. Both guitars sound great!

[@Rustymcdangles]

Thanks for this video. I can’t wait to order this guitar, I’m beyond excited

[@kaput450]

i think #1 is the RK it just sounds bright and new. I know this is old but am anxious to see the answer. I have 2 RK banjos and they are excellent instruments. I like #2 better.

[@chrispark716]

I would guess #1 was Martin. By the way, I just ordered Recording King RD-126 prior to watching this video. I’m glad you had good things to say about this brand. Always enjoy your videos. Thanks!

[@theapplepaul]

JP- a Halifax of a player! And so right about the trajectory of the big guys. I had a D18 back in the '70's. And a Guild D40 in the '80's. Guild peaked in the '70's. Martin earlier. Gibson earlier. Taylor is newer-so they are actually improving. But the door was left wide open for well priced guitars that actually sound good- and Alvarez, Blueridge, Eastman, Recording King etc. jumped right in. Alvarez is in another category actually as they have been around a long time making excellent guitars, just not held in the same esteem as Martin- but they should be. And then Yamaha, the giant that many - including me- overlooked but makes some worthy and balanced guitars. Although for $4K an F9 to me is a tough sell vs even a $3K Alvarez. Honduran old stock mahogany. But for the $800- $ 1,500 price range, lots of great guitars. None made by Martin, Gibson or Taylor. When you can spend $20- $35/mth on zero interest financing for a very decent guitar, your excuse for not having one is gone. The tradeoff is you may have to buy it sight unseen and return or sell it if it is not a good example of that model. Because even if you are a cash buyer. there may not be a new or used one in your area. At least with You Tube videos and a good quality headphone you can get some feel for the tone.

[@rickved]

I listened with Beyerdynamic Amiron headphones. Number 2 seemed.a little brighter, but I can't say which I prefer.

[@davidharrick469]

My vote is the Martin is the second guitar. The second guitar had a more fuller sound to the lower register notes. Both sounded good, but I prefer guitar 2

[@richardabbuhl]

The first was the Recording King RD 328. It was brighter and harsher. The second was the Martin D-28. It was softer, warmer, and the notes were clearer.

[@janfrombelgium5410]

Where is the answer? Or when is it going to come 🤷🏻‍♂️ I absolutely preferred the first one, it judt had much more in it. It just made me smile... The second one sounded more compressed. So, I think nr 2 was the Martin 👀

[@patrickwillshire6388]

I’m leaning towards the Martin being the 2nd one, only because of the bigger bottom end, however, that said, I prefer the first because I love the trebles and the clarity stands out for me. Great show, John, from Down Under.

[@addisonlockeentertainment7339]

Martin was number 1 . #2 was softer . I think that the sharper sound of #1 might be a result of the less finish and larger hole. There you go my thoughts.

[@johntarman3234]

I would guess guitar 2 was the Martin just sounded a little more aged.

[@treverjones2921]

Without looking at comments, I chose #1 as the Martin. Good comparison. Thank you and enjoy your channel.

[@bradchalmers4894]

I think #2 was the Martin. It has a warmer sound. But, they are very close and I think it just goes to show that it has more to do with the player and less to do with the instrument. Ultimately the player has to be happy with the sound of their instrument so it inspires them to pick it up often. I enjoy all your all your videos, especially in these crazy times. Looking forward to live entertainment again!

[@zHumanfactor]

I think #1 sounds more powerful (perhaps slightly more noise/overtones, than #2) , #2 was more controlled or focused from note to note. I think #1 would be a better fit for someone performing where a strong voice is needed (street, outdoors, etc) , while #2 might be better in the recording studio or stage and play better with other instruments. Having said that, I preferred the #1 guitar overall.

[@williamroberts900]

I agree and couldn't have said it better

[@ovash1]

I think this video is more difficult than the Alvarez comparison video. On that video I thought the second guitar was clearer than the first. On this video I like the second guitar but not by much. They are almost identical. I don't know Martin guitars, only played one in my life, I can only say what sounds better to me. Great video, I love this channel and really love the way you think, God bless.

[@michaelcox960]

I felt that the first was the RK and the latter was the Martin. Unlike many commenting here, I felt the difference between the two quite discernible (however this is NOT to say that I am CERTAIN which is which - but only that they were quite different 'in my ear').

[@BoatersMarineSpply]

This is fun! I own and play 3 Martins (D45, DRS2, and HD28E). Number 2 sounds like the Martin to me (Warm rich lows, great mids, and rich highs). I'd bet on this! Although I have lost a few bets on the KY Derby here in Louisville KY - Cheers

[@jbanjo056]

This was awesome sir, very helpful

[@HayesTech]

I also wanted to mention that the Alvarez MD60BG that you made a video on, is made from solid East Indian Rosewood back and sides and a solid sickness spruce top. You got it right in your initial video. I know because I actually contacted Alvarez and talk to them. I was getting ready to make a video and I had a few questions that I wanted answered, so I could be correct in all my statements. 1. Top it's solid AAAA Sitka spruce. 2. Back and sides are solid East Indian Rosewood. 3. Neck is mahogany 4. Neck to body joint is compound dovetail. 5. Glue used throughout is white wood glue. The newer models have switched to a more eco friendly white wood glue though. 6. Bone nut and saddle 7. Either rosewood or Indian Laurel is used for the fretboard and bridge depending on when it was made. I hope this helps someone looking to purchase an Alvarez. My favorite is the Recording King but I live my Alvarez too.

[@ralfybaby]

The 60 is a hog The 70 is the rosewood one

[@HayesTech]

@@ralfybaby Yes, you are correct. I miss spoke. But I wanted to bring to light that the Alvarez MD series are made from all solid wood. There is no plywood in those guitars. And yes, the 60 series, like what I have, is African Mahogany and the 70 series is East Indian Rosewood.

[@ralfybaby]

@@HayesTech well you were more correct than John 😁

[@TaiChiBeMe]

I tried a Parlor Recording King at Guitar Center and it was not good. I did like the Taylor GS Mini there and bought that. I also did buy an Alvarez MD60BG (dreadnought) and it is a very good guitar. It was $100 less than the Taylor GS Mini, but I had to pay someone $100 to set it up properly. Couldn't bar the first fret when I got it, but now it plays and sounds great.

[@draganklj]

Number one TRK, number two M. Thank you for honest and authentic advice. I trust you. All the best

[@donyoung7874]

I just came across Boucher guitars and your videos. I've spent hours watching them since. Your playing is awesome and those guitars sound phenomenal! I have coveted a Collings for years but now I want to sell some things to buy a Boucher. That Recording King is amazing for what appears to be $500. It does have a worn in sound.

[@HayesTech]

Just to let you know, I purchased this guitar after watching your videos and haven't looked back. I love my RD-328. Thank you for introducing me to this great brand. I wanted to do a video showing that some cheaper priced guitars could sound as good as the name Brand guitars and this one definitely does that. Thank you again for opening my eyes to Recording King.

[@josephsantana3094]

Id like to see an Eastman vs Martin video. Or if not a full test like this maybe just a short video about your thoughts on Eastman guitars and where you think they stand against the Martins and Taylors and boutique brands.

[@RLabbe508]

Great video JP, based largely on your opinion of the RD 328,mine should arrive in a couple of days!

[@eds.8458]

#2, Martin? Thanks Sir, you are a master no question. Both sound fantastic to me, in your hands.

[@philbustard]

I thought #2 had more of the Martin sound, but it was a hard decision. The 1st guitar sounded like the action was a bit to low and the frets were choking some of the tone.

[@RadioTime.]

I think that #1 was the Martin and #2 was the Recording King. The first guitar I thought had a bit of a twang going on. I preferred the second guitar personally, seemed to have more overtones happening with a higher high-end, a lower low-end and an overall fuller and balanced sound. Both great sounding guitars.

[@breakandrun70]

Hi J. P; I think #2 was the Martin. To tell the truth they were really hard to tell. The first guitar sounded a little tinny to my ear. Will be interesting to see what the results are. Thanks for the great video.

[@williamknell864]

Wow. Very tough. I'm thinking 2 is the Martin. There a rounder, woodier thing to the attack. 1 sounded "stringier" or slightly brighter. On that final chord, the decay mellows down, so they sound damn identical. Ridiculously close, over all, and they both sound great. Wild. Now I'll check out the answer video, well after the fact.

[@Southernguitar74]

Oh, and I own the Alvarez md60ebg because of you and I am certain they are all solid woods. Solid spruce top, solid mahogany back and sides. No laminates on these babies! Incredible value...And I am close to buying a Boucher BG-52, or perhaps another Gibson. I have always preferred them over Martin. Sorry, fan boys. Lol

[@USNAVDC]

The Recording King looks beautiful. I love torrified guitars! One of my guitars is a 1963 D-28 that my dad bought new... it's a beauty.

[@tobystevens9183]

#1 is brighter. #2 has a warm sound. Both sound great!

[@callehellstrom]

Great video JP! I curious... if you would pick between the Yamaha FG3 and the RD 328 Recording King.. which would you choose? They are in the same price range and are both high praised by you. Maybe a comparison video like this one?

[@l.a.cantinabandofficial1541]

J.P the last time you did a video like this you convinced me to get a Alvarez Md60bg. Sad story the Alvarez got cracked and didn’t make it. After that I was gifted a Martin D 16. Now I’m watching this, I’m only a minute and a half in and I know I’m gonna end up on reverb tonight looking at Recording King RD 328 and RO 328s trying to pick one out to buy😂 lol

[@skaybaltimore]

I'm going to say that guitar #2 was the R.K. RD-328, mainly because I heard a slightly annoying metallic edge/"buzz" to some of the notes that I didn't hear on guitar #1. We'll see.

[@kendallhadden]

The Alvarez MD60BG is solid wood which is what I thought you compared in the prior comparison video.

[@johnbaker4666]

I got the last one right and I think #2 is the Martin. I'm not a Martin nut but I think that higher end guitars are more likely to sound more balanced in general and more consistent recorded. #1 had something going on in the midrange that was tweaking on my ear a bit. It might have just been the way it was responding to the mic though. If number #2 is the Recording King then wow. I have to get me one. They both do sound great either way.

[@vincentlussier8264]

I can clearly hear a difference. The first was brighter sounding and the second was a little deeper and darker sounding. But which is which, you've got me! On a dice rolling guess, I think the second was the Martin.

[@kenwalker2868]

I think #2 was the Martin. Both sounded great and beautifully played.

[@tubadylan]

I honestly had trouble hearing the difference, but if I had to choose I think I like number one best. However, I think if I listened again I might change my mind. So close!

[@lhvent]

You do some great videos. I have a Recording King 12 string guitar and it is great. I also have a Yamaha FG830 and it is without a doubt the nicest guitar I have ever played and that includes some high end Martins.

[@redfox8626]

Great test JP.. I don't know which is martin but i know that i like the 2nd guitar slightly more than the 1st.

[@jasonuzzardo6508]

OMG - What is the answer!?!?!?!?!?! they both sounded amazing. I just ordered the recording king rd-328. cannot beat the price and quality!

[@kyleharleyanderton]

The RD-328 was first. I love mine, it needed a good setup, and I also put bone pins. It's a beast

[@Randysax1955]

J.P......I just saw this for the 1st time. I'm now chasing a Recording King to "back up" my Martin J40. Did you receive the Recording King via the post,..or were you able to get one that was sold and set up locally ? Just curious- Thanks ! Randy

[@azibolino]

I also think the 2. is the Martin. But the RK sounds very good! One of my guitars is a RK Ros 06, a 000-12Fret. And i love it.

[@752brickie]

I played a Recording King RD 126 " I think that was the model" at a music store in State College ,PA probably 6-8 years ago and it was AMAZING !! I have a Taylor,4-Martins and an Alvarez and I will tell you the Alvarez is an amazing guitar ! Love your Playing you take a backseat to no one my friend ! I would guess the Martin is the second one ? But I do not have any Dreads only OM,and 000's !

[@endoffate5475]

The Alvarez is Solid African Mahogany back and sides..I bought it because of your video and its now my best guitar.. But Damn now i need the 328!

[@ayushpratap4726]

Should I buy RD 328 or Martin D28?

[@endoffate5475]

@Will Stanley music RD 328

[@endoffate5475]

@Will Stanley music Ok, the 318?

[@endoffate5475]

@Will Stanley music I have the alvarez bluegrass and its good but its more of a bassy guitar without that much brillance to it..Its got its own sound, it svery loud loud and bassy..I suspect the RK 316 will have better top end and not as much bass but still plenty.

[@endoffate5475]

@Will Stanley music np

[@neilanderson2374]

Fantastic video. I ended up buying a B-stock hog back version (RD318) of the RK off the back of this. Great value. Bouchers are something else tho

[@electricragtime]

I would love to see/hear you do a comparison between the Martin and a Peerless PD75

[@tubadylan]

Can’t wait to see the followup video...

[@ClaytonWillisMusic]

You mentioned the Alvarez MD60BG was laminate back and sides. But I was under the understanding it was solid Mahogany back and sides. Just as the MD70BG is solid Rosewood? Could someone confirm?

[@archofthecross]

Great video. I’d like to get your take on another brand that competes with Martin. It’d be great if you can compare Martin’s D28 with Takamine’s EF360S TT. Thanks!

[@joedown962]

JP, I often heard and read that this is Dana Bourgeois who has been the first to torrefy his guitar tops. What are you thoughts about it? Thanks.

[@garthdawson]

I thought #2 had a round sound on the high strings, which is something I noticed on my HD-28 when I upgraded from a DX Martin. The first one sounded scratchier to me, but had the big bottom. Initially I thought the first was the Martin because of the muddy bottom. Anyway, I liked #2 better.

[@drothberg3]

I had a Recording King RD-316 that I just sold. It had great specs, including an Adirondack Spruce top and solid mahogany back and sides. It took me 3 tries from Recording King to get one that had the bridge placed properly so that it could have acceptable intonation. I finally did. I then played it like crazy for 3-4 years trying to get it to open up. It sounded decent but not great, kind of a tight sound, not as open, loud or musical as a Martin D18. I don't know how yours is, but mine was a far cry from a Martin D18.

[@Sherpa38]

Hi, I have an RD316, I'm super happy with it, but I dream of testing a D18!!

[@chrsgodby]

Where do I find the answer please!!!!!!!!!!!!!!JP

[@stevelacombe5291]

What are the top bracing specs and fingerboard with on the Martin v the Recording King? Also watch J.P.’s video that explains why Martins and other imported guitars cost so much because of the taxes involved.

[@reginaldbarnes632]

when do we get the answer? They're both nice, but the second one had a warmth and depth of tone which I prefered.

[@tubadylan]

I have an Aston Origin and love it. The Aston Spirit is also excellent.

[@agoogleuser7832]

JP? What do you think of Blueridge? BTW LOVE your videos and your playing even more!

[@kyleharleyanderton]

Blueridge guitars are great. but recording king is building the same thing cheaper. I own an rd-328 and with a good setup and some bone pins the thing is amazing.

[@larrydering1598]

1st guitar is brighter on the recording. 2nd is softer and a bit warmer sounding. For stage use I would use the 1st. Both sound great. I own a D18v from the 80's and it's like the 2nd guitar so #2 is likely the Martin.

[@3cardmonty602]

JP - Have you ever owned a Seagull Guitar? Yes - I agree that inexpensive guitars do “move” more than Martin’s or Gibson’s. #2 is the Martin. Gibson is making some great acoustics now, but the price is steep. But, I traded in 2 Martin’s for 2 Gibson’s over the last year, and the sonic quality is so much greater and equalized on my Gibson’s - J45 & an AG Parlor Rosewood, and I bought them slightly used and was able to get them for under $1000 each.

[@dewoner4]

I like the more mellow voice/tone of guitar #2. Guitar #1 sounded a bit thin / harsh . Curious to find out which is which.

[@Flatpicknation]

Great job brother🙏🏻

[@jackaro2]

Hey JP. You should do an Eastman comparison. Compare them to a Boucher maybe. E10D- mahogany or E20D- rosewood.

[@glennthomson1828]

JP. I am really interested what you think of Art Lutherie Ami and /or compared to a Recording King parlour, I am considering one or the other as a beginner. Thanks ahead of time

[@jimmylavoie4152]

I 100% cannot tell. The first one had a bit more trebble, like a slight string buzz. The second one was a bit warmer, which I would associate with a newer instrument that isn't quite dry yet. But I really have no idea.