Thanks so much for this! Very clear explanation!! So my professor decides to include this image in his lecture slides but just insisted on explaining it his way, which took over 3 hours, when it could have been explained in less than 4 minutes.
@aisyaputri264010 ай бұрын
Thank you for the explanation ☺ I love Indian channel, they can explain many things in a simple and clear way
@LuisMartinez.22 жыл бұрын
I have to admit, you are a genuine teacher, you got the gift
@xMaKBx Жыл бұрын
Wow, Thank you for this very clear video. 9 year later still very valuable !
@jwestgee9 жыл бұрын
Outstanding explanation - you've got a talent for teaching, man! - grateful student
@ekilmer113 жыл бұрын
Thank you!!! the marble analogy was not working for me to remember the definitions later on, but THE BATHTUB. THANK YOU!!!!!!!
@716sunflower3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for simplifying it so it’s easy to understand
@olivesjohnson94554 жыл бұрын
this just helped me understand my lecture in public health.... awesome video 👍
@enousoroh86702 жыл бұрын
Simple and to the point. This sticks!
@moviemaker6676 жыл бұрын
This is a great way to look at it! I've never heard of it explained like this!
@joramk4 жыл бұрын
Best explanation I've seen so far!! Good job
@Cass_i4 жыл бұрын
Beautiful, beautiful. You've got your self a sub and someone who will be coming back to watch more of your content
@reneemiller28414 жыл бұрын
Yessss!!! This is explained so nicely. Thanks!
@overflownfavored156410 ай бұрын
Thank you for this!!!
@samm74964 жыл бұрын
Very good example! Thank you!
@jamilahardy8812 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@visnuc Жыл бұрын
That's a nice one. Many thanks!
@languageandmana92552 жыл бұрын
You teach it greatly! I wish you would have solved some epidemiology statistical questions as well. I really help need with them
@adrianevangelista73092 жыл бұрын
thankyou for this wonderful and insightful video!!!! monkey be wildin and educateted now, thx
@mutelarsorhougbe46063 жыл бұрын
So good- thank you!
@NehajThak2 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@mojahednhar803 жыл бұрын
Thank you ❤️
@hypnosstratagem12775 жыл бұрын
Great explanation. Thank you.
@rachelwalton8137 жыл бұрын
Excellent analogy. Thank you!
@bilgehanylmaz5173 жыл бұрын
Good explanation, Thanks.
@JoseHernandez-zh5tu9 жыл бұрын
Nice Job! From Afghanistan.
@ApurvaPopat9 жыл бұрын
Nice job done...from india
@shioriryukaze6 жыл бұрын
Thaaaannnk you. Im changing careers and am diving into public health and this concept confused me for a long time.
@romeoliyan92866 жыл бұрын
Great video, teacher linked it for us in lesson and it helped me understand pretty well! Thanks
@kaligdj6 жыл бұрын
Killed it on the explanation!
@AG-tq6we9 жыл бұрын
1:17 .. or they can DIE...
@acesworld77826 жыл бұрын
Just...wow.
@NumberGazer11 жыл бұрын
Hi Rahul, great illustration, thanks a lot! In the pathtub model, there is only one way out (cure or death). I tried to distinguish between people between with and without the disease. Then, two possible exits are necessary. I tried to illustrate this by a "swimming pool model". Best regards, numbergazer
@Fergusbaddog9 жыл бұрын
Awesome job on the lecture!!! Wish you were my professor!
@lorelstuder686110 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@s.a.Tawhid2 жыл бұрын
I have a question here 2:07 . How does here prevalence is increasing if someone cures from the disease? Since he is still in the population so isn't it like cure shouldn't have any effect? However, I'm very grateful for the video. Thanks a lot.
@michigan1085 Жыл бұрын
He doesn't say prevalence increase if someone gets cured... he says it decreases (Because if someone is cured, they no longer have the disease so prevalence decreases). He does say that if we prevent death (NOT cure), then the prevalence increases because now those pple are living with the disease
@krithimurthy5 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much, this helps.
@kuldeeppoonia3403 жыл бұрын
Plzz give me right option of this Epidemiology is used used to determine the...............Of a condition. A. Prevalence B. Incidence C. Both
@ashwinkonga91410 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your explanation!!!
@macleodphiri44177 жыл бұрын
This is very nice information that brushes the dust of old memory. Keep on.
@shilanmozafari38464 жыл бұрын
which one we use for forecasting the patient number in future years?incidence or prevalence?
@drjeffholmes9 жыл бұрын
awesome explanation! thank you
@mernaalbert38949 жыл бұрын
outstanding one !! 😍😊
@shathaalahmed62396 жыл бұрын
awesome explanation!! thank uu!!
@RABBlTFTW883 жыл бұрын
So what is the unit of time for incidence? Is it always agreed to be measured in years? So incidence= the number of new cases of disease in a year? (or is it months or something else?)
@HIMLOVER151010 жыл бұрын
AWESOME video!
@robertktw4 жыл бұрын
Q for epidemiologist: if vaccination reduces death by this bug in the study (1:53)... that would mean less water leave the tub, but would that also mean less water enters the tub (new infections). [if vaccination does not lower incidences or water level, why bother?] So... with less rate (incidence) & water (infected) in the tub, would vaccination DECREASE prevalence?
@oldblueday4 жыл бұрын
I'm not an epidemiologist, but vaccines are typically used to prevent disease (decreasing incidence, decreasing the water coming out of the spout). By that way, it would decrease prevalence. But you make a good point. Some vaccines do give partial immunity (like the flu vaccine when we don't predict the strain right) and so can make the disease less severe when contracted.
@robertktw4 жыл бұрын
@@oldblueday Oh, so it really depends on what the factors are doing to change the outcome. Thank you and love your videos! ^^
@laurapalacio56518 жыл бұрын
Great video.
@chikwi44 жыл бұрын
I didnt know the Joker from the Dark Knight was into epidemiology
@oldblueday11 жыл бұрын
Peter, there will be a video on this soon. Here's how I think of p-value. Think of a court case, innocent until proven guilty. All the evidence makes it seem like the defendant is guilty. You are assuming the defendant is innocent. What is the chance that he is innocent AND all that evidence is true. It's possible but unlikely, maybe a 1% chance. That's what the p-value is - how likely is all this evidence true given that the person is innocent. [see next comment]
@juice28rsx8 жыл бұрын
awesome
@idlewild Жыл бұрын
You are doing the needful. Teek hai.
@ahmedhelshafay836 жыл бұрын
Nice vedio
@oldblueday11 жыл бұрын
So we arbitrarily picked a number, 5%. If the probability of all that evidence happening if the person is innocent is less than 5%, then he's probably not innocent. He's guilty. So we reject our initial assumption (innocent until proven guilty) if the p-value (probability that all that evidence is true AND he's innocent) is less than our previously set threshold (5%).
@abayayelign47855 жыл бұрын
Wow
@sarahblissmorin41594 жыл бұрын
Can the incidence rate be more than the prevalence rate? Thank you for the video.
@RaidingPartyGames3 жыл бұрын
Prevalence isn't a rate, it's a single-unit measurement. Incidence is cases per time-unit, prevalence is a snapshot measurement of the number of cases at that time. As a comparison, salary is dollars per hour, savings is a snapshot of what you have in the bank currently.
@WingSteels9 жыл бұрын
Thanks, you made my day ! :)
@GeraldIsingoma-s3u2 ай бұрын
Thanks much But u have not taken about recurrence
@yobiwolrd075 жыл бұрын
I am confused how do you calculate to find out prevalence?
@marac90875 жыл бұрын
Number of Cases that exist divided by the number of population in the study.
@qbpsusy4 жыл бұрын
It is well explained! but I am taking courses to learn how to teach, and according to them, this is too boring to them. So... apparently I have to make this more fun, I am looking for a more entertaining class, and this is not helping because this is basically how I learn and teach.