I tackled this by substituting sin(t) into the Taylor series for atan(x) about x = 0, then dividing the result through by sin(t), and doing term-by-term integration on the series. This gave me the same series as you derived at the end. Of course, then I got stuck because I didn't recognize the power series for asinh(x) ...
@Swybryd-Nation2 жыл бұрын
Yes this technique should be called Euler’s Technique. he used it to evaluate integral of sin(ln(t))/ln(t)*dt from 0 to 1. This gives pi/4 see Dunham’s Calculus Gallery book for details. You can use this for Achmed’s integral as well.
@Reboxy12 жыл бұрын
Oh man the same thing happend to me I was about to tipe that
@0xTJ2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the re-upload!
@englematics2 жыл бұрын
I propose a solution using Feynman's technique which I think is simpler. Let f(x) = int_0^pi/2 (arctan(x*sint))/sint dt. Then h'(x) = int_0^pi/2 1/(1+x^2*sin^2 t) dt. Multiply top and bottom by sec^2 t. Then substitute u = sqrt(1+x^2)*tan t. As a result h'(x) = pi/2 * 1/sqrt(1+x^2). Then h(x) = pi/2 * ln|x+sqrt(1+x^2)|+C. Since h(0) = 0, C = 0. Then h(1) = pi/2 * ln(1+sqrt2) which is the same answer!
@heungseoblee59802 жыл бұрын
I have doubts about mathematical validity of Feynman's technique - Maybe I have no talent about mathematics :(. NEVERTHELESS, this way is brilliant!
@xizar0rg2 жыл бұрын
Given the quantity and variety of videos done, I feel like enumerating them in the title (similar to how lockpickinglawyer does) would be valuable for reference. This is especially true given that many of the videos have frivolous titles, such as this one ("the return of big intervals").
@gastonsolaril.2372 жыл бұрын
Nice one, M! Though aren't you missing the "2n + 1" denominator in the leftmost integral term that you are writing at 5:38?
@SuperSilver3162 жыл бұрын
I mistakenly read this video as arcsin(sin(t)) and was wondering why you didn’t just do t/sin(t), and now I see the error of my ways. That’s still a good problem to have tackled before I watched this though!
@noahtaul2 жыл бұрын
22:57
@agamanbanerjee90482 жыл бұрын
16:21 Shouldn't that be dx then dy?
@holyshit9222 ай бұрын
(-1)^n*(2n-1)!!/(2n)!! simplifies to -1/2 choose n and from binomial expansion we have \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}{{-1/2 \choose n }\cdot x^{2n}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1+x^2}} If we integrate both sides we will get arsinh(1)
@FreshBeatles2 жыл бұрын
and thats a good place to start
@SuperSilver3162 жыл бұрын
One other idea I had you can integrate by parts and make some substitutions and the pictured integral reduces into int(arccosh(x)/(x^2+1)) from [1,inf) Which at least from a cursory check through wolfram gives the same answer. Curious to see if anyone has any ideas on how to tackle it? I think contour integral should work theoretically, Collects residues at i and -i, and you are integrating along the principle branch of the hyperbolic inverse cosine, so I think it shouldn’t be too hard?
@jorex68162 жыл бұрын
If I'm not mistaken the derivative of ln(1+√(1−y²)) is actually y/(y²−√(1−y²)−1). At least WolframAlpha says so and I got the same result. Or is there a possible factorization I'm missing?
@jorex68162 жыл бұрын
Yeah okay, after quiet a lot of manipulations I got the same result as the one stated in the video
@bjornfeuerbacher55142 жыл бұрын
@@jorex6816 You don't need much manipulation. The derivative is 1/(1+√(1−y²)) times (-y/√(1−y²)). Multiplying the numerator and denominator of the first fraction with (1-√(1−y²)) gives (1-√(1−y²))/y² times (-y/√(1−y²)). And then you are almost done.
@jorex68162 жыл бұрын
@@bjornfeuerbacher5514 Stimmt! I multiplied all the inner derivatives together and only then rationalized the denominator which lead to more steps than necessary.
@a_llama2 жыл бұрын
Great problem! Also, the audio's somewhat tinny
@thomashoffmann88572 жыл бұрын
The fraction in front of the integral temporarily got invisible. But luckily it reappeared around 7:20 🤗
@tgx35292 жыл бұрын
Peace for all people!! arctg(sinx)=sum[(-1)^n *(sinx)^(2n+1)/(2n+1)] n=0;....., We have then integral suma(-1)^n (sinx)^(2n)/(2n+1) =suma (-1)^n/(2n+1) integral(sinx)^(2n)dx , we can use finally Wallis formula for the integral, there Is also uniform convergention of series by Dirichlet test.
@carstenmeyer77862 жыл бұрын
As an alternative to _Feynman's Trick,_ you can also rewrite the given integral as a double integral: *I := ∫_0^{ 𝜋/2 } arctan( sin(t) ) / sin(t) dt* *=: ∫_0^{ 𝜋/2 } ∫_0^1 f(r, t) dr dt | f(r, t) := 1 / ( 1 + r^2 * sin^2(t) )* The integrand *f* is absolutely integrable and the integration bounds are constant, so we may change the order of integration via _Fubini's Theorem._ The substitution *s := tan(t)* yields a much nicer double integral: *I = ∫_0^1 ∫_0^∞ 1 / (1 + s^2 + r^2s^2) ds dr* *= ∫_0^1 [ arctan( s√(1 + r^2) ) / √(1 + r^2) ]_0^∞ dr* The upper bound yields *𝜋/2 / √(1+r^2)* while the lower bound vanishes. We are left with *I = 𝜋/2 * ∫_0^1 1 / √(1 + r^2) dr = 𝜋/2 * [ arsinh(r) ]_0^1 = 𝜋/2 * arsinh(1)*
@dattierarbre92942 жыл бұрын
Fantastic
@richardheiville9372 жыл бұрын
Anyway, if you want to use series expansion, what about Wallis' integrals?
@jorgepresto88232 жыл бұрын
My solution to the problem is the following: In te target integral, change variable x=sin(t); in the next integral develop in power series Arctan(x) ( it can be done because x is in [0,1]). In the resulting integral change variable y=(1-x^2)^0.5 and finally change variable y=sin(w). The final integral is integral(cos^(2n)(w) dw) which drive you to the solution.
@DWestheim2 жыл бұрын
This escalated quickly.
@MultiWiskid2 жыл бұрын
Impressive!
@faresberarma33492 жыл бұрын
can be done easily within one line
@ChefSalad2 жыл бұрын
I think your mic's gain was set a bit too hot for this recording.
@threstytorres43062 жыл бұрын
I hope you edit it, if not i'm bad for you
@SuperSilver3162 жыл бұрын
I figured it out!!! You can integrate arccosh(x)/(x^2+1) through contour integration!! Look at the integral of (arccosh(x))^2/(x^2+1). Take the principle branch where the function is analytic everywhere except for (-inf,1], and use a keyhole contour with an indented circle around z = 1. The integral around the large semi circle vanishes and so does the indented circle around z =1, so all you have are the contributions from the residues, and you can collect the integral you want from the negative real axis, but you have to be very careful about how you define the arccosh(x) about the negative real axis, specifically in the regions (-inf,-1] and (-1,1). But it can be done!!
@holyshit922 Жыл бұрын
I calculated it with double integral arctan(sin(x))=Int(sin(x)/(1+y^2sin(x)),y=0..1)
@StarsManny2 жыл бұрын
Audio works now 👍
@mihaipuiu62312 жыл бұрын
Beautiful,....but ..hard demonstration. The first part was easier finally, I understood all. The formula with arcsinh(1) I have to look at it separately.For me math. is a hobby.
@richardheiville9372 жыл бұрын
Consider F(a)=\int_0^{\pi/2} \frac{\arctan(a\sin x}{sin x}dx ,compute F'(a) and it's easy to compute F(1).
@bjornfeuerbacher55142 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't say it's "easy" to compute F(1) - but at least it's _way_ easier than what Michael did do here. :D
@richardheiville9372 жыл бұрын
@@bjornfeuerbacher5514 1/sqrt(1+x^2) has an antiderivative that is well-known. The harder part is to compute \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{1}{1+a^2\sin^2 x}dx The change of variable u=\cot x is probably a good one here.
@bjornfeuerbacher55142 жыл бұрын
@@richardheiville937 I did it this way: \frac{1}{1 + a² sin²x} = \frac{1}{cos²x + sin²x + a² sin²x} = \frac{1}{1+ (a²+1) tan²x} \frac{1}{cos²x}, and then use u = \sqrt{a²+1} tan x.
@richardheiville9372 жыл бұрын
@@bjornfeuerbacher5514 Your change of variable is weird. It will introduce the variable a in the bounds. IMHO, u=cot x is better.
@bjornfeuerbacher55142 жыл бұрын
@@richardheiville937 No, the bounds will simply become 0 and infinity.
@StarsManny2 жыл бұрын
Audio is broken ☹️
@0xTJ2 жыл бұрын
It works fine for me.
@federicopagano65902 жыл бұрын
Its just insane lol
@franksaved38932 жыл бұрын
When the professor says there will be only one question in the calculus 2 exam. The question:
@ChefSalad2 жыл бұрын
The inverse function of sinh(x) is not called the hyperbolic arcsine of x nor is it written arcsinh(x). The actual inverse function is called the "hyperbolic area sine" of x and is written arsinh(x). Thought I'd let you know.
@nasim090219752 жыл бұрын
I waited 23 minutes to hear the coveted “…and that’s a good place to stop” ☺️😃
@reggaetyro96592 жыл бұрын
Sin sinner peculiar morals. Etymology. Science. Scientific law. Law.
@hassanalihusseini17172 жыл бұрын
OK, nice video, but that was a mouthful really! 🙂
@theoliveinyourmartini2832 жыл бұрын
There's no audio
@0xTJ2 жыл бұрын
Try closing and re-opening, there is audio.
@johns.82462 жыл бұрын
Horrible. Can't you just use a Taylor series expansion and then integrate?