The Role of Belief in Science w/ Prof. Karin Öberg (Aquinas 101)

⭐️ Donate $5 to help keep these videos FREE for everyone!
Pay it forward for the next viewer: go.thomisticinstitute.org/don...
Faith and reason are not opposites, but rather are two different ways of coming to know the truth.
The Role of Belief in Science (Aquinas 101)
For readings, podcasts, and more videos like this, go to www.Aquinas101.com. While you’re there, be sure to sign up for one of our free video courses on Aquinas. And don’t forget to like and share with your friends, because it matters what you think!
Subscribe to our channel here:
kzbin.info...
--
Aquinas 101 is a project of the Thomistic Institute that seeks to promote Catholic truth through short, engaging video lessons. You can browse earlier videos at your own pace or enroll in one of our Aquinas 101 email courses on St. Thomas Aquinas and his masterwork, the Summa Theologiae. In these courses, you'll learn from expert scientists, philosophers, and theologians-including Dominican friars from the Province of St. Joseph.
Enroll in Aquinas 101 to receive the latest videos, readings, and podcasts in your email inbox each Tuesday morning.
Sign up here: aquinas101.thomisticinstitute...
Help us film Aquinas 101!
Donate here: go.thomisticinstitute.org/don...
Want to represent the Thomistic Institute on your campus? Check out our online store!
Explore here: go.thomisticinstitute.org/sto...
Stay connected on social media:
/ thomisticinstitute
/ thomisticinstitute
/ thomisticinst
Visit us at: thomisticinstitute.org/
#Aquinas101 #ThomisticInstitute #ThomasAquinas #Catholic #ScienceAndFaith #ScienceAndReligion
This video was made possible through the support of grant #61944 from the John Templeton Foundation. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the John Templeton Foundation.

[@Chamindo7]

Thank you for helping me grow and learn as a new Catholic. The Thomistic Institute has been a source of support for growth in the virtues. Thank you. Sancta Maria, ora pro nobis. Vivat Christus Rex

[@ThomisticInstitute]

We're very happy to hear this! Thanks for watching. God bless you.

[@benhutchinson9808]

Dr Oberg is great.

[@abualymotivator3222]

Excellent. Thanks a lot. Prof.

[@CedanyTheAlaskan]

This channel has helped me so much. It seems that when I have a doubt or serious question/concern, The Thomistic Institute seems to have either a video on the subject or on topics around the subject. Thank you so much! God bless you!

[@ThomisticInstitute]

We're glad you've found this channel so helpful! God bless you!

[@lauzeladasse]

Another good one video from the faith and reason. Thanks TI, God bless you

[@ThomisticInstitute]

You're welcome! Thank you for watching. God bless you!

[@briantrafford4871]

Amen

[@jonofarc443]

👏👏👏 This is great, thanks!

[@ThomisticInstitute]

Thanks for watching. We're glad you enjoyed it!

[@jonofarc443]

@@ThomisticInstitute I've been wanting to get deeper into Thomism, so I signed up for Aquinas 101. Thanks for making it free!

[@hoyokutensho7]

Great video! Thank you, Dr. Oberg!

[@sunroad7228]

"Energy, like time, flows from past to future".

[@ponzianomanning3071]

Well said. Thank you1

[@Cpripri85]

👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

[@jay-senphang7565]

Excellent video. However I would say that from an evolutionary perspective there is a very strong adaptive advantage towards surviving and reproducing if an individual organism's observations of nature and ability to reason and react effectively to those observations is stronger rather than weaker. This perception/consciousness does not require a creator/designer to exist but is actually a major driving force in evolutionary biology.

[@shashikamanoj1160]

Karl Popper : Conjectures and Refutations

[@williammcenaney1331]

I've heard Prof. Lawrence Krauss deny that he believes anything. So I want to ask him whether he believes that he denies that he believes anything. What does he mean by "believe?" You can define knowledge as a justified, warranted true belief. If that definition is accurate, then when you know something, that presupposes that you believe it, too. But believing differs from knowing because you can believe a false statement. Though Dr. Krauss may be a great physicist, maybe he needs to learn about logic and philosophy.

[@ZacharyCath]

Lawrence "from nothing, to nowhere" Krauss. He's a character, that's for sure!

[@williammcenaney1331]

@@ZacharyCath When he debates whether God exists, Krauss seems too philosophically ignorant to debate the question competently. He's like Christopher Hitchens when Hitchens debates Prof. William Lane Craig. Like Hitchens, Krauss says a lot. But he doesn't criticize his opponent's arguments. If I debated quantum mechanics with Dr. Krauss, that would humiliate me because I haven't studied physics. But I probably know enough about Thomism to debate St. Thomas's cosmological argument shows that God is real. Dr. Krauss makes a category error each time he talks about different gods. Sure, he can use the word ""god" to stand for Zeus. But if he knew what classical theists mean by "God," he would see that it doesn't even make sense to think God and Zeus are members of the same kind. Zeus is a fictional object. But if he exists, he has a cause because he has parents. God has no cause. If there were no God, there would be no causes, since there would be nothing at all.

[@danielvso]

I believe the many women that accuse him of sexual harassment and even more.

[@matthewmayuiers]

@@danielvso I don’t like Lawrence Krauss at all, but most of the sexual abuse allegations brought against him ended up being dropped and proved wrong. I looked into that again because I saw his interview with Jordan Peterson.

[@ZacharyCath]

​@@williammcenaney1331 My favorite way to respond to the "many gods" arguments is by conceding it... ;) . By this, I mean it's as you allude to...God isn't a "god". The Lord tells us this in Exodus 3:14, when he says to Moses: "I AM THAT I AM".

[@Ajas0810]

I like her crucifix

[@hglundahl]

_"Faith and reason are not opposites, but rather are two different ways of coming to know the truth."_ You mean faith and reason-ING, right? Both are acts or habits of reas-ON. The one faculty that does know the truth - or doesn't know it.

[@MrFossil367ab45gfyth]

There is faith in both realms of religion and science. Faith in God or God's and holy books and texts is in religion. Faith or confidence in research, data and findings is in science.

[@traesaint9328]

Why is a woman preaching in a Thomistic Institute video?

[@antoniopioavallone1137]

epistemological realism is literally a belief.

[@matthewmayuiers]

Thomistic realism comes from judgements, not beliefs.

[@antoniopioavallone1137]

@@matthewmayuiers I'm saying that without God we cannot be sure that our cognitive faculties are aimed to truth. So this is not a problem for believers, this is what i wanted to say.

[@letdaseinlive]

@@antoniopioavallone1137 That's slightly inaccurate. It is a problem for the believer which is why the theological virtues include hope. It is a very great problem. For the non-believer, it is not yet a problem due to an innocent or pre-conscious lack of response to being.

[@antoniopioavallone1137]

@@letdaseinlive Okk tell me how do you justificate epistemological realism without God and also explain to me why the universe itself would have rational laws.

[@letdaseinlive]

@@antoniopioavallone1137 Exactly by faith. Faith means not having God. It wouldn't be faith otherwise. I refer you to the "theological virtues". Put another way, God himself doesn't require faith.