The Rolex Explorer is Great...Buy THIS Instead | Tudor Heritage Ranger 79910

[@WatchCrunchOfficial]

Join the conversation at WatchCrunch: www.watchcrunch.com/Max/posts/the-forgotten-explorer-alternative-5484

[@matlindell5022]

The Explorer is arguably the best Rolex ever released for a one watch collection.I have been wearing mine everyday for 26 years and I love it to death !😍

[@WatchCrunchOfficial]

Yours must have some nice patina 😍

[@matlindell5022]

Yeah ,definitely nothing at all can compete with an Explorer 1.Fyi I got a Daytona back in the day and sold it !i didn’t give a shit about wearing a watch witch is totally useless in a daily basis use.

[@michaelriera6277]

Couldn’t agree more. Of my 6 watches, my 124270 Exp gets the most wrist time. 36 is perfection.

[@travisolson9190]

We have to see this daily wearer!

[@mdo5121]

One watch for 26 years worn every day and in love with it....THEN WHY DO YOU EVEN VIEW WATCH VIDEOS?🤣

[@akacenturio500]

It is subjective, but size really matters and watches can hardly be "too small" but they can easily get "too large". If Tudor makes a Ranger in 36-37mm it would sell like crazy.

[@WatchCrunchOfficial]

Yep, let's hope they are listening!

[@binyard1972]

Well said couldn't agree more the tudor dial is way too big

[@anthonysmith2982]

I don't think that Tudor nailed the recent iteration of the Ranger. And I think it's lack of mass appeal speaks to that. I believe it will be 38-39mm when it appears again (and I both hope and think it will appear this year). I say this for two reasons: Firstly, I do agree with your comment, but also think believe that many feel like the Wilsdorf Foundation have sized buyers out with the 36mm Explorer, and have a noticeable gap across both brands in their field/GADA watch offerings at the very size that many still regard as the 'goldilocks' diameter. Secondly; the BB58 is tiring due to both saturation and it's oft toted 'near perfection'. As we often see, genre defining pieces of design can tire quickly and fall victim to their mass appeal. Tudor giving the BB treatment to the Ranger (Black Gilt dial, 39mm, a splash of red...) achieves both (possible) objectives imho.

[@markusweber7445]

it depends on your wrist size, I am over 7 inches, and a 36 Inch watch just looks like a child‘s watch on my arm. I own the Heritage Ranger ( I wear it as I write this), and it fits me perfectly, like a 36 to 38 would on the Guy in the Video….

[@simptrix007]

1926 in 36mm doesnt make it for you?

[@brett2396]

I’d suggest the Black Bay 36 instead. This Ranger needs to be 36mm. The BB36 is a great mix between the OP and the Explorer. It has the chunky case that makes the 36mm feel like 38mm like you’d want and also costs about the same as the Ranger but I think it’s better quality.

[@Nefville]

Agreed.

[@watchcurtisn]

Agreeed.

[@squarestanley]

Agreed. And, man, it wears so well.

[@mikec3454]

I own a BB36, OP36, and 124270… can definitely attest the BB36 is a fantastic watch for the money!

[@brett2396]

@@mikec3454 absolutely! It’s very comparable for a fraction of the cost

[@BrittPearceWatches]

Ahhhh I loved this video! I love hearing your thoughts. I’ve once done a BB36 vs Explorer video. I mean! Tudor alternative are freaking fantastic and I feel like they truly embody the tool watch. The Explorer is so elevated and fantastic! If you’re happy to sit on a waiting list, I’d say Explorer! If not - tudor is great!

[@olivierorban787]

Hi, I have the Tudor Ranger 41mm for 2 years now, perfect watch for my big wrist. But last week, I went to the Tudor AD, je show me the new 39mm. What a shock! And, I bought the watch… for my son. Sooooo nice

[@siamrahman1409]

I have Daytonas, Subs, Datejusts you name it, but when I can't decide what to wear, I always gravitate towards the Tudor Heritage Ranger. Sometimes I just don't wear anything else for weeks on end and just have this watch on almost 24 hours of the day. Such a beautiful watch and wears super nice on my 6.5" wrists. My only critique would be if it was a 37-39mm (like the newer Ranger) and if there was a curved integrated bracelet but this is a Nato monster. Looks good on virtually any Nato strap in existence haha.

[@fredbinion6685]

Nice to see someone giving kudos to the Tudor Ranger. I 've had mine since 2019 when I was looking to buy an Omega. When I saw the Ranger, I was hooked. I put the watch on and it's been my everyday watch since. It keeps good time and the waterproofness is great. The metal band is solid and the brushed look is rugged. It can be worn with anything during any occasion. Again, great review!!!!

[@strud_]

When I was looking at getting my first expensive watch (for my budget) I wanted the Ranger so bad, but I felt it was just a tad large. Then I fell in love with the BB36 and been in love since. Looking at saving for a Railmaster but the Ranger is still my fav watch. If they drop the size a mm or 2 and I’m a buyer

[@WatchCrunchOfficial]

That is the dilemma Ian, let's hope they revise the formula for the sequel 👍

[@frankpetiet4519]

A couple MM off and I will be first inline at the AD. As someone who isn't a fan of Mercedes hands I think the tudor looks better aswell!

[@WatchCrunchOfficial]

Gotta love the simplicity of the shovel 😉

[@edrader]

i just bought the steinhart adventure for $464. i haven't gotten it yet but i love steinhart and the price. and now is the time to take advantage of dollar/euro parity

[@vamark7751]

I just did the same and am quite happy. As they say, to each his own, but to me prices on Tudors are wildly inflated. Get a lock out of folks feeling they are bargains in light of Rolex costs. Lemming behavior.

[@taylorj9589]

I have had a Tudor Ranger in my collection for around 5 years now. I tried it on along with an Explorer (when the cases at ADs actually had Rolex watches for sale lol). I preferred the size, the dull brushed finish, and the 150m water resistance of the Ranger. It had more of a rigged tool watch vibe for me. I still really enjoy my Ranger, especially on a NATO (I've never been a fan of the straight end links). Added bonus for me is that it was never plastered all over social media, and I rarely see another one when I'm out and about. I try to avoid the hype and buy watches I enjoy. I feel a lot more people would enjoy the Ranger if they gave it a try and formulated their own opinions.

[@boop8621]

So many people have opinions about and so few own it.

[@m.e.p.r]

I think 36mm is the size you want for an Explorer 1, the proportions of the now discontinued 39mm were off. I also honestly think there is no alternative...you're always going to be disappointed if the Explorer is the watch that you really want. The Tudor is a nice homage watch though.

[@jamesminshall4601]

I recently tried one on and wasn’t keen, for me the dial felt empty. I would have liked it to be smaller, 38-39 mm would be lovely. If they do release another I would love to see a smaller version but keeping the smiley on the dial.

[@WatchCrunchOfficial]

Yeah there's a bit too much space on the dial

[@OCDC2004]

They just did release one:

[@peakrider4886]

Tudor should release this watch again. Agreed, 37 or 38mm would be ideal, and the price point is bang on. I would buy one. But, there’s stiff competition out there, and dare I say it, a new homage from Steinhart that mirrors the previous Explorer 39mm dimensions, but at less than a 10th or even 20th of the price. It’s very tempting!

[@HaonProductions]

I figured Tudor's best bet would be a new 39mm Ranger with an in-house movement. It would slot in perfectly between the BB36 and 41, but maybe it would step on the toes of the BB58? This is all moot for me though, since my ideal is the OG 34mm Oyster Case Ranger that wore like a 36! Wish I'd gotten one of those when they were still like 1k.

[@kennedymcgovern5413]

I have to chime in for the "had to use my credit card and spend a year paying off my Rolex/ Retired Military" crowd: For this section of your collection, also look at the Hamilton Jazzmaster Viewmatic. It has most of the features of this Tudor, and I think I paid around $800 for it. Don't quote me on the price, but it was definitely south of a grand. It has the size, the 12, 6 and 9 arabics, the "crossover" looks between formal and sporty, non merceded hands... The downside: They toned down the beatrate in order to give it 80 hours power reserve. It clocks at 21 and not 28. BUT, if you are not worried about anyone seeing your "Rolex" stamp, then you are certainly not concerned with anyone putting their face in your watch to see if it ticks 6 or 8 times per second. Listen, if you are wealthy, God Bless ya. Even better of you earned it yourself. In either case, fill your collection with Rolex, AP, Omega and the rest. On the other hand, if you are a regular collector, like me...I suggest going into debt ONCE, and only ONCE to buy your one grail watch. Enjoy that one watch, as owning it releases you to be able to look at ALL the price levels, as there is no extra pride in hitting the Rolex well twice. Once that is out of the way, you will be amazed at what is out there on the market. I absolutely LOVE my Hamiltons!

[@andrewbarten7347]

Everyone forgets the Longines Conquest 39mm. An Explorer homage with 300m water resistance.

[@theunitedkingdomofhorology8996]

I used to have one of these but the size drove me mad, so much negative space on the dial! Ive got the current 36mm Explorer which is lovely, that said if Tudor had got it right first time (around 39mm) it would be unlikely that i would have the EXP. Great vid again!

[@WatchCrunchOfficial]

Yep, agree with you 100%, it's just the price difference makes it a great proposition!

[@michaelriera6277]

The 124270 is prefect in every way with the exception of someone with hulk size wrists/hands.

[@edteach3r]

Thanks for making the video. I love my Tudor Ranger and always make a point explaining that it’s 41mm size is just perfect for its purpose. The Heritage Ranger is a real tool watch… function over form, and that ETA movement is cheap to service as well as easy to repair. Once you use the watch in your daily activities, you will quickly notice that it fulfills its role as field watch very effectively. In the gloom, its visibility is amazing. I love the Rolex, but could never afford it, nor would I wear it where the Ranger goes. The Heritage Ranger was a God-send… the more it gets scuffed, the more I adore it. P.S. I wish I bought the North Flag also when I had the opportunity. That one I would baby. 😊

[@Paul-vu5bo]

As a fellow Ranger owner I completely agree. A perfect field watch and the more scuffed it gets, the better it looks!

[@edteach3r]

@@Paul-vu5bo Absolutely! One just cannot help but love the Ranger.

[@yousif4646]

Agree 100%. I love how it comes with small details that only an owner would realise over time. Never a boring piece.

[@alansmith4395]

Decline to support the brand in any way given the rampant racketeering. If you wanted this, get a grand seiko sbgr253 or a sinn 556 depending on your preference for dress vs tool.

[@darrenhargreaves8613]

Size is perfect. Just picked one up, the size on paper does seem large for the smaller wrists. But it just works

[@michaelkeaton32]

That person in the forum had it right - Ball. Very underrated watches. I have a couple of their watches, and I'm really impressed with their quality.

[@WatchCrunchOfficial]

Yeah they are super cool, I'm trying to get used to the second hand 😁

[@rcm4u2]

Great points, I agree the Ranger re-introduced with the in-house chronometer movement at 38 or 39 mm would be a huge hit! Thanks!

[@jennyfromjapan]

how did you know i just google'd "rolex explorer alternative" yesterday? a desperate attempt, i know, and so i'm glad that you posted this video the next day

[@WatchCrunchOfficial]

I can read your mind Jenny 😁

[@DrElyG]

Honestly I think the Longines Conquest 39.5mm Blue dial is a great Explorer replacement. Its sporty and elegant and sits very nicely on the wrist.

[@WatchCrunchOfficial]

I gotta get one for review 👍

[@user-xh5pi2nf9q]

Haha. Your comment about the BB58 is kinda how I have grown to feel about them. I don’t see many “in the wild” but they are so often recommended. I’d still wear one, I still like them, but I’d rather get ahold of a Omega PO 2500.

[@msbrownbeast]

3:59 The metal bracelet is poorly integrated with the watch head. Lack of a full end-link (as found on the Rolex) places more stress on the push pins. I guess Tudor wants to maintain flexibility of easily switching out to a Nato/leather strap (or vicxe versa).

[@yousif4646]

Whichever way you look at it, the new one just doesn’t seem to smile back at you like this one does. Happy I’ve pounced.

[@thehooch-man2657]

Another good video. I agree an updated version of the Ranger would be quite awesome. For me, the dial, handset and case would be determine whether or not I'd buy one. I prefer something more classic that hewed closer to the original design. Obviously an updated movement. And, of course, a generous amount of lume. If it is intended to be a field watch, then lume would be important in low light situations. It would be ideal for camping, hiking or anything outdoors. And yes, desk-diving, too.

[@nickdebenedetto2087]

Tudor absolutely needs to revive the ranger in a 36mm size. In my opinion, 36mm is just perfect.

[@michaelriera6277]

It is the perfect, classic gentleman size.

[@AK-pr2nk]

Totally agree, Rolex get it with sizing most other brands don't. A watch can be to big but not really to small. A 36mm ranger I buy tommorow

[@Xanduur]

This is 1 of my 2-watch collection. The other being a ‘67 Seiko Railway pocketwatch.

[@CaptainSnappy]

7:37 I think your wish came true! What do you think of the new version?

[@finesse49]

I Have a few problems with the Ranger as an Explorer substitute. It's no longer available new (at least not easily) and many people don't want to go the second-hand route. 41mm can't substitute for 36mm or even 39 IMO. Subjectively I don't care for the hour hand (or the snowflake hour hand on other Tudors for that matter) and the 12 on the dial throws off the balance. YMMV

[@justinh1258]

I had this and loved it, but the ETA crapped out on me after a few months with huge time loss and the ETA rotor spin while hand winding issue. The dial also was too fat, would have been perfect at 39mm or increasing the bezel/lug thickness.

[@powidel2118]

Same issue here. Had to get it fixed from Tudor after about half a year. Finally sold it and got myself a 114270…

[@justinh1258]

@@powidel2118 Yeah everyone aways raves about how ETA is a “workhorse” and reliable but I’ve never had a good experience with them. Tudors in house are just as nice as Rolex, I’ve owned both. If the Ranger comes out in 39mm with an in house I’ll buy one right off the bat.

[@WatchCrunchOfficial]

Yeah looks like mine has the spinny rotor on winding issue 😞

[@justinh1258]

@@WatchCrunchOfficial it sucks! Every single one will develop it. It’s a guarantee with this movement.

[@mschumer]

Does anyone talk about those years when the explorer was 39mm? To me that’s perfect. I haven’t tried the 36 but still feel I would prefer the 39. I do own one. Now I know you cannot get one at retail anymore and the ranger Im sure is a great choice but for me the Explorer 1 Mk2 dial is perfection.

[@milanchristi7939]

I'm a big Tudor fan but my Longines Conquest (39mm) scratches my 'Explorer itch' for half the price of the Tudor. Whaddaya think? Can the Conquest be included in the same conversation? (Curious minds want to know!)

[@WatchCrunchOfficial]

The contrast l conquest is great! But a slightly different dial design than the 3-6-9

[@morganthedruid1]

I'd forgotten about the Ranger. I tried one on at a local jewellers quite a few years ago, it was on the bund strap, and was 75% there for buying it but the size was the issue for me and I passed on it. It's got one of the best looking dials around for me, it gives me Panerai vibes for some reason, and if they did shrink it down a few mil it would also look fantastic with a cream dial.

[@WatchCrunchOfficial]

Yes yes Morgan, the numerals are very "panerai", maybe they thought the size should be as well 😂

[@jeanlefranc3817]

Yes, the 41 mm Ranger has real street cred and is indeed a more faithful successor to the 1016 than the modern Rolex Explorer. But, for half the price you paid, I would still go for the Sinn 556a, with its slightly more compact dimensions and better looking hands, IMO.

[@WatchCrunchOfficial]

Love the 556, had one, regret selling it 👍

[@johnsinclair2672]

Agree, the modern explorer is more bling - as with most Rolex, and little do do with its origins. Sinn, a tool watch that is understated and elegant. you can’t go wrong with Sinn.

[@VMIyanks04]

You should do an updated comparison with either the newer 39mm Ranger and the 39mm Explorer, or the updated Ranger with the current 36 or 40 Explorer. I’ve always wanted the Explorer 36 but am gun-shy about spending so much if the Ranger is just as good of quality. Seems like I’m just paying extra for branding and a little dressier looks.

[@FS-zn9xe]

Hi Max, thank yoou for bringing this Tudor to my attention. Before that video did not even know that model existed. Fully agree with your take that the line should be revived with an inhouse movement and at a size of probably 39mm. If it was for me, adding a date complication would be nice (even if it was/is not part of the Explorer/Ranger DNA) and having solid end links that touch the case. Greetings from Germany!

[@robdickson5902]

The Heritage Ranger is a great watch. The only time it feels big is after switching from a much smaller watch, but I find that subsidies quickly. There is quite a bit of blank space on the dial, but I prefer it to the 39mm Explorer 214270 which I had and then sold. If Thdor came out with a new Ranger at around 38 to 39mm, that would probably make it appealing to a wide audience. Nice midway between the Heritage Ranger at 41mm and the Vintage Ranger at 34mm.

[@WatchCrunchOfficial]

That was my exact impression Rob, especially the comparison stuff the 214270 👌

[@RedwoodAggie]

I think 41mm probably made more sense when it was launched. I would love to see one in person. 41mm is definitely more sporty, and I could most certainly wear that. My main complaint was the open end links on the bracelet version. It'd love to see this re-launched at 39mm with closed end links, and a 2nd strap (single pass NATO or leather) in the box, with that new movement/COSC certification. I agree that the 36mm is just too small for a lot of people. A unique size would help it gain its own identity more, rather than just an OP with 3/6/9 on the dial. I tried on a 39mm Explorer not long ago, and it fit so beautifully on my wrist that I was even more disappointed it had been discontinued. Although the $9.8K price on it was reasonable for the market, vs. the list and what they had been going for a before discontinuation means I have no interest in paying that. It's a nice watch, but not THAT nice, as much as I love the design. Tudor's teaser about exploring your world in leading up to W&W 2022 has me hopeful, but it could also be a new GMT variant.

[@llcharl1e]

I bought it when it first came out 8 years ago. Most underrated military sport watch.

[@WatchCrunchOfficial]

Good stuff 😎

[@j.j.h.atemycereal]

Yes! If you’re into small dials, great. But those of us with larger wrists can rock the Ranger all day.

[@WatchCrunchOfficial]

Yeah The 36 explorer feels a bit dainty honestly

[@markjosephbudgieridgard]

Well yes I see where your coming from regarding the Tudor Ranger..... But Tudor like Rolex are all eyewateringly overpriced, overrated and overhyped in my opinion and I've owned several watches from both manufacturers.... Now a real alternative to the Rolex explorer is the Zeno explorer for £400.... Looks like a Rolex explorer and from a bonefide Swiss watch company with a Swiss automotic movement all this for £400 is a steal I own one and its a great watch.... Great value guys 👍

[@weezkidtube]

Great video, thanks for taking the effort to review this piece. I'm glad I own this compared to the new Ranger. Much prefer the Tudor rose and crown stamp plus the smiley down below. You can't beat that red second hand. My wrist is 6.3" and it feels just fine. True field watch!

[@SuperBechti]

It is true that this watch, like you said, is not so appealing at first, but once you get to see it at a closer look it does grow on you. Well done my friend. There is another Tudor that also requires some attention; the Heritage Advisor. The Mercedes hand doesn’t bather me, on the contrary I really like it, but the snowflake does. This the reason why I do like those two models.

[@WatchCrunchOfficial]

Great points! The advisor has an interesting history 👍

[@SuperBechti]

@@WatchCrunchOfficial thanks Max, keep on doing the good work. I love it and especially since I’m Swiss and very proud of our watch industry. Guys like you make it even better.

[@reggiedixon2]

I have a Ranger, I love it but if it was 38mm diameter and 10mm thick it would be so much better. Agree about wearing more popular watches just says "I follow the crowd". Big watches just strike me as overcompensating for something.

[@danielx40]

Tudor just released a black bay pro looking like an explorer II. The only thing wrong with Tudor, is that it’s not a Rolex. Yet an Explorer II was about 5-6k a few years ago, now it’s 12k north. You could buy a decent sailboat with that money.

[@ahdee5]

What about explorer 40 vs the ranger 39? Which would you choose?

[@timelesssneakersandwatches]

Blasphemy indeed! Lol 36mm is perfect for the explorer. Great vid bro! Idk why I can't connect with this Tudor 🤔🤔

[@goodonthewrist]

Just watched this video again… Max… sounds like you’ve got your wish with Tudor adding an in-house movement and dropped it 2mm… maybe you had an influence on this??? Can’t wait for your review on the new release!!!

[@WatchCrunchOfficial]

Haha thanks buddy, I'm on the list 🤞

[@dlealchicago]

Great video. Follow up video comparison needed after new launch.

[@WatchCrunchOfficial]

I'm on it! 😉

[@waynejohnson3214]

I have one of these. Somedays, I think it's awesome, and somedays, I wish it were smaller. I think a watch of this purpose should disappear when you're not looking at it. When wearing the Ranger, you're aware of it every second.

[@WatchCrunchOfficial]

Haha, yes Wayne, the Ranger isn't inconspicuous 😂

[@nickdebenedetto2087]

This is also an area where Tudor needs to resist Back Bayifying the original Ranger design. Just make it again with modern components and they will have an instant classic. I own a 1016 and I would be very tempted by a revived ranger with the classic proportions.

[@rodsalvador3608]

Look forward to your take on the new Ranger!

[@simonwright6882]

I'm a fan. Does anyone know if there's an after market bracelet with fitted female end links for the ranger??

[@josephburton3232]

I love the design of the watch but like you said, they should bring it down a few MM. I'd also like to see them get rid of the open end link style bracelet and have a fully connected bracelet instead.

[@WatchCrunchOfficial]

You got it Joseph 👍

[@isluderea8322]

I have the new 36mm Explorer, as well as a 41mm Sub and a BB58. 36mm is not to small. At least for me. I don't have a thick wrist and i'm not fat. The Explorer just looks perfect on me.

[@EDHBlvd]

Love my Heritage Ranger. I also love my North Flag, which has similar vibes and story behind it, though not historic. Both are amazing watches, that sadly didn’t sell well. Maybe Tudor can bring them both back in a new form.

[@SuReZ]

Time has come, the new Ranger has arrived. A couple of millimeter smaller and equipped with in-house movement as you asked 😉 T-fit clasp is an extra 😀

[@WatchCrunchOfficial]

Hehe, sounds familiar 😎

[@BrandonMenancio]

I agree fully on the new explorer! The bracelet tapers sooo much. Wish they did a 37 to 38ish version. A little dainty to me. Great vid as usual 😁

[@JamesOrlowski]

What green band do you have on that Ranger?

[@chrisgrieves1468]

This is better than the over-hyped Explorer for sure, which is a meh watch going for silly money. 100% agree on a re-issue, which I would pick as a 39 with the MT5402 inside. Kinda BB58 Ranger Edition if you like. Tudor knows that works...

[@Jo5ue1]

I'm liking the 41mm more than the new 39mm Ranger. I like that the older model has the Tudor Rose and that it comes with that premium camouflage NATO strap. I was thinking of selling my 41mm for the 39mm just because of the size and honestly its not a huge difference on my wrist.

[@cmatz175]

Tudor Ranger is a strap monster. Endless choices (got mine on the James Bond nato now). Only wish they would come out with text saying ranger on it.

[@fabriziopizzanelli7035]

Man I love the Tudor Rose logo. I wish they'd use it more over the shield.

[@Lpin101]

Hi Max, what are the differences between watch crunch and reddit r/watches?

[@WatchCrunchOfficial]

WatchCrunch is a platform designed from the ground up for watch content, so you get watch specific features 👍

[@anthonysmith2982]

Hiya Max. Great topic. Two great watches. I have what feels like a long relationship with both pieces despite never owning either so apologies if this comment is long. I’m more a Tudor guy than Rolex - that's more a personality trait than a brand loyalty thing. But despite my 7.75” wrist, I find the Ranger too big. I prefer to get wrist presence via length (i.e. the 37mm Longines Spirit). So I thought I'd try a 39mm 214270 Explorer, however I couldn't get one on wrist for the life of me! The local Rolex AD's don't know me from a bar of soap, even if they did?, no stock. Brick and Mortar dealers/re-sellers?, no stock and wait lists. And no one I know owns one... Then covid hit. So I bought a 'copy' from Tisell. Except for the crown it's essentially a facsimile of the Rolex and the *second* I got that on wrist I *knew* the 214270 was *the* watch, so I got myself on the list. I even called in a few favours so they knew I was legit. And it was going to happen (I think!), may've taken 6 months or more, but I would've got one. Then it was discontinued, the grey market went bananas and here I am a few years down the track. There's no way I'd pay over retail, the 36mm is too small for my taste and I'm not sure I'd be able to get one in todays market; so my dailies are (1) a Champagne Alpinist (SPB123J) on a jubie bracelet (2) a Lorier Hyperion & (3) a brushed silver/rose gold quartz PRX and I'm re-considering this 'luxury' watch business. I continue looking for a left field alternative, like the Eberhard & Co Scafograf 100 or the '57 re-issue Omega Railmaster, the various Loginges Heritage options (the Spirit, the Silver Arrow etc.) and *hoping* that Tudor release a 39mm Ranger with a gilt dial (the daily/field watch equivalent of the BB58). Yet I can't be sure if my motives are 'pure'? Do I simply want a watch with a 'luxury' brand on the dial because my current dailies are (really good watches granted, but) humble timepieces without any real flex? Maybe the fact that I'm asking the question is answer enough? Again Max. Great topic for discussion.

[@AldoFelt]

Right price and perfect dimensions for me. I would buy one.

[@dspserpico]

So is this being updated for the new 39mm Ranger?

[@WatchCrunchOfficial]

Yes, I'm on the list!

[@theenavybluemonster]

A new ranger at 38-39mm with 20mm lug width and a bracelet that fits the watch would be cool to see. They better not add faux rivets. I tried this ranger on a few years ago and thought it was too big at 41/22.

[@larrybivens1852]

I have. Tudor Heritage Ranger on braclet. I love it. I've had it about 5 years. I originally wanted an Explorer at the time I couldn't afford $6500. Not sure I evan want one anymore. Thinking about more Tudor's BB chrono panda or a pepsi GMT.

[@SoCalWatchReviews]

Another great video brother! Keeping up with that #tudorbros mentality, I love it 👏

[@WatchCrunchOfficial]

Haha yeah it's been a bit heavy on tudor recently, thanks Miguel 😁

[@vamark7751]

The Ranger is also a poor value. I have an Omega and a Rolex, which fortunately I bought years ago. At current prices and required AD ass kissing, no way. I put my Steinhart Adventure on and count my blessing that I am not so status driven that I throw my money away.

[@nishchalneupane8673]

I was actually thinking about the Black Bay 36 as a viable alternative to the Explorer. I was indifferent to the ranger until this vid. Would still get the BB36 though.

[@costelloandsilke7321]

The Ranger and North Flag are the two best contemporary Tudor designs - as the don't mimic Rolexes.

[@Cipherfoxx]

Nice video mate! I own one, and the construction of the watch feels superb like a handcrafted watch in comparison with the BB. Love it, pics don’t do it justice, in person is a superb watch! In the first I was concerned about the size but it wears smaller! Definitely an undervalued Tudor!

[@powidel2118]

Bought the Tudor in 2015 but quickly realized it didn’t suit my taste. The open lugs are terrible and the size is way too big. Finally sold it and got myself a 114270. Never looked back. For me the Rolex explorer in 36mm is pure perfection. Apart from the bracelet and clasp of course ;-)

[@WatchCrunchOfficial]

You got it when the going was good 😉👍

[@fabiansuarez523]

Minute 1:03 , man It fits perfect

[@Masiman01]

Hi Max, Ive been a subscriber to your channel for several months and I must say I like your content AND your perspective on watches in general. I have to say that the watch in this category that scratched the itch for me was the Nomos Club Campus w/ Black (Charcoal) dial 38.5 mm x 8mm x20mm inlet. @ only $1500+- WIN-Win

[@WatchCrunchOfficial]

Thanks Ramsay! Yes I love the club, but those lugs are so long 😅

[@SaintAanthony]

Who on the planet can hate Rolex. Rolex is the pioneer of luxury watches. There is no luxury watches without Rolex. They are the top tier of class.

[@pas0003]

Great video! That being said I REALLY dislike the Tudor ranger. Being a bb36 owner and really liking it, Ranger just looks bad. The non-fitted bracelet that has that awful gap. The shape of the hour marker. Agh.

[@reverb508]

I'm just not a fan of the Ranger's aesthetics. The Explorer has just enough going on with the dial to make it look like a fancy watch, whereas the Ranger with its painted numerals and austere dial make it look like an IKEA wall clock. I'd love to see Tudor update the non-diver Black Bay 36 with a 3,6,9 dial like we see on some of their bronze watches. That would be a killer Explorer alternative.

[@michaelfierman3256]

"Less trenchy" Now that's a new phrase🙌 So how about a new North Flag? We are living in an integrated bracelet world no matter how much we stamp our feet.

[@WatchCrunchOfficial]

Yes, combine the best of the Ranger+north flag would be awesome 👍

[@carlvoxvires]

1yr later, Tudor Ranger 39mm perfect. Also everyone is starting to appreciate it after initial negative press (great bargain used!)

[@user-xh5pi2nf9q]

New Ranger out, I’m sure you’ve see. It by now. But I thought of this video as soon as I saw it.

[@Cipherfoxx]

Oh Ranger vs Explorer it means something big for the Ranger haha. Also talking about the actual retail Explorer prices 😰 So big points for the Ranger

[@travisolson9190]

I liked the Ranger. But Im torn between the P-01 and this. Although I would enjoy an cream Ranger dial.

[@WatchCrunchOfficial]

The P01 is a very unique piece 👌

[@yousif4646]

I ended up owning both of these as well as the Heritage Chrono (aka Montecarlo). I have a great deal of fun wearing these.

[@nebbs]

The first Rolex Explorer (ref 6350) had those same straight bracelet end links.

[@lukewalker1051]

Let me summarize. Its too f-ing big. Shame on Tudor for screwing up the appropriate dimensions to make this watch more desirable. Pretty clear that Tudor didn't want to encroach on the coveted space of parent company Rolex detracting from the iconic Explorer. Buy an Explorer or a clone and not this Tudor aka Invicta wannabee.

[@the_shadow_realm5110]

5:15 Max has cracked the case. The new Tudor coming in 4 days will be an updated Ranger!

[@WatchCrunchOfficial]

Here it comes!

[@IsaacCheck]

Looks like u will be buying the new one now?😊

[@nintendokings]

Rolex has gone insane. As you say, $4k for an Explorer is a very cool watch. $10k? No chance lol.

[@WatchCrunchOfficial]

Yeah, should've bought one back in the day 😁

[@vamark7751]

Really think it is worth $4K? Nah

[@ericmoss8344]

The Explorer is a cool watch, but way to small for me and my 8" wrist. My 40mm No Date Sub fits quite nice and I'd be all over an Expl in the 40-41mm range.

[@toonchien]

M79950-0001 RANGER , time to review this ^^

[@cjammer18]

I really enjoy your videos thank you

[@tiongloo5310]

I love my Rolex Explorer 214270. Great watch.

[@WatchCrunchOfficial]

That's a good one! I've reviewed it too 👌