The Science of Patterns

[@Human_Evolution-]

Keep making these. My notes are way more intense while listening to your videos compared to any other educational videos. These videos are dense, not many words are wasted.

[@AsifMehedi]

I'm so happy I discovered this channel and your website today. This is top quality content, covering concepts and tools that can drastically improve how we think about the world. Truly appreciated.

[@lzl4226]

I don't know if it's the voice but.... although I understood all that's been said, I now need to take a nap and it's only 9am in the morning.

[@bapa39]

Excellent series

[@nanotech_republika]

In general nonlinear does not mean, that they have to have be "not a straight line on the graph of proportionality" (at 6:00 minutes into the film). A parabola describing correlation is still linear. A better description of the nonlinear phenomena is "lack of ability to extrapolate" from the previous (or nearby) part of the relationship. I am guessing that this concept might be equivalent to a concept of a function. If a function is discontinuous at some point, for example it jumps suddenly or if it splits in two, or if it is simply not defined, the function can be termed as nonlinear. Similar thing can be said about correlation.

[@DavidGonzalezSamudio]

A parabola is non-linear (meets the any curve, but the line). Proportionality among phenomena described by a parabola relates the domain and another domain co-relation being continuous yet not 1-1. You need both for linearity proportionality: one thing relates to one of the other things (1-1), and all things to relate to the all other things (continuity). Curving other than linear means that one thing relates to more than one of the other things (1-many). Consider Q-Q (Within Domain) and Scatter Plots (Domain to Domain), where such proportionalities are desired.

[@eddieretelj6409]

Great description of pattern concepts!

[@ngc-ho1xd]

Thank you so much for making this series!! Liked subscribed and turned on the notification bell!!

[@zaidsserubogo261]

What is the difference between emergence and algorithm?

[@LeafyPeels]

f(x) = 2x should be f(x) = 2^x I think

[@Igor-v7b]

Being doubled is not the same as being raised to the power of x.

[@eidechsebernstein954]

Madison is right. x=1: 2^1= 2 x=2: 2^2 = 4 x=3: 2^3 = 8 x=4: 2^4 = 16 And so on

[@stevewells6828]

Good catch! Looks like they're defining x as the previous term, which is a very odd way of doing it. What they really mean is "n+1 = 2n". This is the same as saying f(n) = 2^n.

[@MrKibitz]

Steve Wells you are stupid shit

[@MrKibitz]

Crookshanks Is Awesome why are watching such videos, you are stupid as shit!

[@teotba]

I prefer the voice of the man in the first video .. the rest is excellent

[@samuelcorp637]

f(X) = 2^X, not 2X

[@aliamrmostafa6943]

i didn't understand a single thing can you make more simple

[@SystemsInnovationNetwork]

It think this is about as simple as it gets really

[@MixMastaCopyCat]

emergence is a pretty dense topic because of how abstract and generalized it is. sadly I'm not sure how they could have approached this any simpler

[@nanotech_republika]

Give it a few years, if you are still a teenager. And then comeback. These lectures are excellent given what is available on the KZbin. But I think the author does not understand the topic at the level he wants you to think he does. If he did, you would understand it. Even if you were 10 year old.