The Shockey Ararat Expediton to Noah's Ark

Dr. Don Shockey was the initiator of the expedition to the site of Noah's ark. Without him and Dr. Carl Baugh, there would have been no such expedition to the ark in the year of our Lord 1990.
Dr. Don Shockey and Dr. Carl Baugh were co-directors of the expedition. There were eight individuals on the team. Two of which, Dr. Carl Baugh and Robert Summers, I personally spoke with in an interview. Unfortunately Bob (Robert) couldn't met the next day for the on camera portion of the interview with myself and Carl, to give an account of his experiences during the expedition us all. Perhaps in the future.
However we still have Dr. Carl Baugh interview which gives us insight into what they learned about Mount Ararat and Noah's ark. I hope you enjoy it and it gives you a deeper understanding of the way God guides us and history. Please support by sharing and subscribing, thank you.

[@johndelong5574]

To those who believe, no evidence is neccesary. To those who refuse,no evidence will suffice.

[@johnmichaelson9173]

A person can believe with all their heart & still call stories like this total bullsh*t. Simply because stuff like this is total bullsh*t. It's similar to the Ron Wyatt claims which aren't true & they not only embarrass Christian faith but they are also aimed at good Christian folk because that's were the money comes from. They use a person's faith as a step towards requesting financial support because they're doing the Lord's work but fact is that they aren't doing any such thing.

[@AnwarHussain-pm6vo]

Refar Qur'an& Baibil

[@johnmichaelson9173]

That's what you say when you have really awful evidence. It's just an excuse.

[@johnmichaelson9173]

@@AnwarHussain-pm6vo I don't know what that means? Sorry.

[@theworldthroughtheeyesof]

After posting this documentary yesterday, Dr. Carl Baugh and myself felt not enough credit was given to Dr. Don Shockey for his contributions, as he was the one who initiated the expedition in the first place. We have given this documentary a new name and revised it slightly to reflect his contributes made during the expedition to the site of Noah's ark.

[@allensearson8369]

Thanks for sharing this video. It seems you were able to film some scenes, within Dogubeyazit and of Mount Ararat. Yes, God's ark is upon that mountain. Its authentic resting place is along the upper slope of the southeast side of greater Mount Ararat. The broken structure is still positioned, much in the same way, as testified by Ed Davis. Apparently, it is now in at least three large sections...a main section resting along the original ledge, and more broken sections positioned lower within the southeast canyon. The Russian expedition was there, Ed Davis was there, and countless others have been there, throughout history, including my own SMART research team. God's ark still has a purpose to serve, as a witness to the nations...I am overjoyed at the reality that God directed me, in 2004, to "Go to the mountains of Ararat", so I may help reveal the truth about His ark on Ararat. Going to the ark is the beginning of a restoration process...

[@theworldthroughtheeyesof]

You're welcome and thank you for your testimony. Yes I have been there, but everyone seemed to think the ark was on the mountain nearby where Ron Wyatt and other others said it was at, but it is an old Tamerlane fortress. They only lied for fame and money. The problem is it is in no ones interests to tell you where it's at and I will go back to see it and bring back an artifact to be studied, since now I know the approximate location. It's not wise to wonder on an ice covered mountain you are unfamiliar with. While I do think it serves a purpose, I still think with or without it we have the truth. When I became a Christian, I thought there is no way that ship is still around. Which it is logically after thousands of years of war, decay and just people using the wood to build other things. I've heard that it is in more than two pieces now, have you seen it for yourself?

[@theworldthroughtheeyesof]

@@allensearson8369 That's great to hear brother. And yes it is around the south eastern side somewhat near the center., Bob Summers showed me on a 3 dimensional map where the location is. The French ground penetrating radar in 1982 showed there was large structures on top of the mountain made of wood, as well. I hope you are able to gain access to it this summer.

[@theworldthroughtheeyesof]

By the way, if you are going to be there this summer, what is your contact information? I would like to collaborate with you if it is possible.

[@billrobbins5874]

Interesting but difficult to believe anyone with all the stories circulating around. Would be nice to see some actual filmed evidence. An opinion.

[@trainman1209]

Terrific broadcast! Great to see Dr. Carl Baugh! Long time!

[@geoff3103]

I would think a drone with a strong lense could find this thing in mid September after a summer of melting. We know where to look on the mountain too.

[@nickma71]

Can a drone fly to 15,000 feet? Give or take. It's otherwise a great idea.

[@geoff3103]

@@nickma71 I'm sure they can, but it doesn't need to get that high. 10,000 feet (if that) with a strong lense is more then ample.

[@nickma71]

@@geoff3103 If the ark is above it, then 10k isn't high enough it seems. I think they need to be above the locations as like with the helos. The one picture is very near the 16k summit. It's not on the summit of course, it is down below the saddle. Google has broken up their images from separate events. Why? It distorts the images and maybe that is why. Always remember, the Bible says nothing of the ark's survival. And the picture from Arslan is incredible.

[@geoff3103]

@@nickma71 you see this video? kzbin.info/www/bejne/ooermqKGe5WZaac def an area of interest. And it sounds like the place from past sightings

[@geoff3103]

@@nickma71 do you have any of those pics from google maps? yes, I agree with that picture AA took. IF its legit.

[@rickykey1175]

The Lord is going to show it before Long the closer the end time comes all the mystery will be shown the devil don't want us to see 👀

[@rodimusprime9599]

Hi brother, the Lord bless you. For sure the ark is on Mount ararat. With Google pics and with Google Earth I have taken several pics of the ark. Someone posted pictures and video of the Ahora gorge not too long ago, like a year ago, and in certain frames the ark is there. It's in several pieces. 2-3 pieces , each piece is very large box looking. There is no doubt whatsoever, very easy to prove.

[@nickma71]

Google earth doesn't show anything, and that is not an accident. They use a composite layering to hide details. Post a screen shot if you have it.

[@rodimusprime9599]

@@nickma71 yes your are absolutely right. What I meant to say is using Google search I found picture on the internet of the mountain with the ark. Someone people unknowingly took pictures of it. Very clear . I'm not talking about the Ron wyatt site. I'm talking about the real ark on the mountain.

[@nickma71]

@@rodimusprime9599 I recommend the book The Explorers of Ararat. I read a couple of decades ago, probably a few years after it came out. The Shockey section with Arslan's picture is astounding and I can't figure out why people aren't talking about it. I mean other than those that were there. What I thought was that looks just like Elfred Lee's drawing from Hagobian's story. The drawing came before the picture. That is very compelling.

[@rodimusprime9599]

@@nickma71 yes I have that book excellent book. There are pics on google of the ark.

[@fabianasensio1168]

and please enter that door, with great help..Roy Masters Meditation exercise.

[@michaelk3582]

What would be the satellite coordinates of this anomaly location with the wood and the end of the upper half of the ark exposed? I have actual photographs, some of them covered with snow, others that were taken without snow on them and you can clearly see the structure, and oddly enough the end looks exactly like your diagram at 10 minutes and 13 seconds of the upper half where you can see into the broken part. And even the rooms and the floors look exactly like the actual photographs. With the coordinates be the same as what is known to be the Ararat anomaly?

[@nickma71]

On Google Earth, the views are obscured by manipulation, but it is up over the Ahora Gorge.

[@Captain.Crispy]

Hysterical!

[@anahitasoyan6219]

Շնորհալալություն բոլորին։ Սակայն ոչ ոք ինքն իրեն չի հարցնում' ինչպես են թուրքերը հայտնվել ու դարձել քրիստոնեական ու բիբլիական սարի տերը։Նրանք մահմեդական են ,ի՞ նչ կապ ունեն այդ վայրերի ,այդ սարի հետ։Եվ ոչ ոք չի ասում ,որ մենք ենք ' հայերս ,Նոյան հետնորդները,ծոռների ծոռները։ Թող որ ես թքեմ մարդկային արդարության ճսկատին։

[@carolinesameh8726]

very interesting video

[@Aram-vq3ng]

И не одно слово про Армении и армян, которые жили там всегда,до геноцида турок 1915 года.А Шумер,это просто город и многие "шумерские" слова переводятся на армянский язык...

[@hankscorpio8928]

18:02 when Jesus closed the door of the ark? Your timeline is off. Way off.

[@theworldthroughtheeyesof]

When God closed the door of the ark, who physically closed it? God the Father, God the Spirit or God the Son? Who was Adam walking with in the Garden of Eden? Who was Moses speaking with face to face, as with a friend in the tabernacle, in the wilderness? I would say your lack understanding the scriptures is evident and to rewrite them to know the truth. The truth shall set you free indeed.

[@joseramonperez9609]

This video is really interesting, cause personally for me, the remains of Noah's ark could be on *_Mount Ararat, Agri Dagh,_* so, I have a question that I would appreciate really much a respond, Dr. Shockey is him still alive? I really admire Dr. Shockey cause his great contribution to the Search for Noah's Ark, and I haven't heard about him for a long time.

[@theworldthroughtheeyesof]

Yes, both him and at least two others of the original eight on the Ararat Expedition. I met with one other off camera and he confirmed the same story, with others that were apart of the expedition in some capacity. He is a very humble man and is fond of learning.

[@joseramonperez9609]

@@theworldthroughtheeyesofIt is great news that he's still alive and the others too, I hope one day I can greet him and share some words with him. Thank you very much.

[@plainsman]

There was NEVER a worldwide flood. How do you explain the relative ages of mountains? For example, why weren't the Sierra Nevadas eroded as much as the Appalachians during the Flood? Why is there no evidence of a flood in ice core series? Ice cores from Greenland have been dated back more than 40,000 years by counting annual layers, and the Vostok Antarctica cores go back over 400,000 years. A worldwide flood would be expected to leave a layer of sediments, noticeable changes in salinity and oxygen isotope ratios, fractures from buoyancy and thermal stresses, a hiatus in trapped air bubbles, and probably other evidence. Why doesn't such evidence show up? How are the polar ice caps even possible? Such a mass of water as the Flood would have provided sufficient buoyancy to float the polar caps off their beds and break them up. They wouldn't regrow quickly. In fact, the Greenland ice cap would not regrow under modern (last 10,000 yrs) climatic conditions. Why did the Flood not leave traces on the sea floors? A year long flood should be recognizable in sea bottom cores by (1) an uncharacteristic amount of terrestrial detritus, (2) different grain size distributions in the sediment, (3) a shift in oxygen isotope ratios (rain has a different isotopic composition from seawater), (4) a massive extinctions. Why do none of these show up? Why is there no evidence of a flood in tree ring dating? Tree ring records go back more than 12,000 years, with no evidence of a catastrophe during that time.

[@joseramonperez9609]

@@plainsman there are for sure several pieces of Noah's Ark scattered on the mountain, and there is a huge piece covered with rocks, dirt, snow and ice in the Ahora Gorge at the edge of a drop off at 14,000 feet high, but now it is not visible.

[@leuchtturmamrandderwelt5713]

@@plainsman Before the flood there was neither snow nor ice and high mountains. The earth was ideal for giant lizards. Even dinosaur fossils with remains of skin were found. People's timing is wrong.

[@MichaelWorthy25]

According to Ed Davis, the Ark is somewhere in the Alborz mountains of northern Iran. Ed Davis mentioned that he was in Qazvin before hiking into the mountains for three days. After seeing the Ark remains in a canyon near a high peak (more than likely somewhere near Alum-Kuh), Davis said he stopped in Tehran for supplies after a five day trek back from the site. Davis never said anything about Turkey like the traditional Christian historians do. Ed Davis was in Iran, not Turkey. Mary Irwin even published a book about how the Ark is in Iran and not Turkey. Not to discredit the efforts of the men and their search, but the Ark is not on Mount Ararat. The Ark's landing place is on a mountain range south of the Caspian Sea.

[@theworldthroughtheeyesof]

Clearly you didn't look at the photographs and you can see from google earth the something similar on top of that mountain. You are missing what is in front of you and to suggest another place without at least a photograph would be difficult to convince that it is somewhere else. I'm not saying that it couldn't be, but what is on top of that mountain would have to be explained and then proof provided to determine if that is actually the right place or not. As for Turkey its boundaries in that area were not well established until the 1950's, therefore it isn't surprising that he wouldn't have mentioned Turkey. If you look at the map it is right on the border of Iran and what was the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union controlled much further into what is today now concerned the boundaries of Turkey. Just some food for thought.

[@MichaelWorthy25]

@@theworldthroughtheeyesof The scriptures say that Noah's descendants traveled from the east and settled in Shinar (modern Iraq). Iran is east of Iraq. Traditional Mount Ararat is north west of Iraq (Ancient Babylon). Please explain how that makes sense.

[@theworldthroughtheeyesof]

@@MichaelWorthy25 Yes but that was after they multiplied. Only Noah and his wife, it appears, stayed in the same area. Although he may have moved later as well. Another thing to consider is the mountain the ark landed would have been taller or just as high as all of the mountains, because it rested on the top of a mountain in the seventh month before the mountains were visible in the tenth month (Genesis 8:4-5). I also want to you to know I actually do appreciate you putting forth your thoughts. It helps me think about how I can next time present facts more clearly because there will be a future video on this site, God willing.

[@maxsavage3998]

@@MichaelWorthy25 stop making excuses and believing every ignorant theory. Look at the facts. There is huge wood structure buried in the Ararat Mountains and this has been found and explored in the NAMI expedition already. Stop beleiving all the nonsense out ther

[@joseramonperez9609]

Hi everybody, looking into the comments about whether Mount Ararat (Agri Dagh) or a different place could be the Noah's Ark landing place, in my humble opinion, there's a point to consider about the landing site, first, Mount Ararat is the first place where a serious and a deeper research should be carried out, second, "Urartu" or "Ararat", this kingdom or geographic area contracted and expanded over time, and there were times when some of its different rulers made conquests that brought its borders a little wider than what we usually see on most maps, there could be a place that we're ignoring, of course, Urartu's borders never went so far into Iran, as some researchers have suggested in the past; so we have to be objective about this, and finally, what the biblical account says about that Noah's descendants journeyed from the east it may be important, Noah and his wife may have stayed in the same area, but, if that's not the case? this could be the third important point that maybe we're ignoring.

[@karenhardy7964]

The Ark came to rest in the “mountains” of Ararat. Ron Wyatt gets all the credit, as he and his sons were sent by God to discover many things, including the Ark. the top of Ararat is treacherous at all times. God also warned of many to take the credit given to Ron by God.

[@theworldthroughtheeyesof]

@@karenhardy7964 Ron Wyatt came to Dr Baugh and wanted to him to do an excavation of the site he believed the ark was at. Well after digging into the side of it, it was determined to be a building and further research lead to discovering it was a palace of Timur. I personally spoke with other on the expedition off camera and they verified his story and their findings. There is no ark at that side and the ark is not on the top of the mountain as the volcano has made the mountain larger. It’s about three quarters way up. I hope this helps.

[@trinidadscorpion3835]

I went to the North Pole and found Santa's workshop!

[@Spacekriek]

Be sure to post some pictures of that.

[@danhardin7243]

I bet he is still a Roman Catholic in good standing!

[@nairdossantos272]

Tem em português. ?

[@RS-rb8fr]

I have alwaysed believed since the find in the 70s onward that this was the site the ark the god proven rath that is to follow in a short view years may God have mercy on all of human live.

[@davemorin-if3wk]

dinosaurs in ark?

[@OikPoinFive]

Only 2, baby dinosaurs only. I hate those dinosaurs for they themselves have sent millions to hell. Utterly useless things dinosaurs yes as a kid and adult very interesting, books, cartoons, movies, museums, etc. but it's an atheist worldly thing! Never served a purpose. You would think the Bible would've got more in depth on Dinosaurs before, during the Flood, and right after....

[@trainman1209]

Expedition.

[@plainsman]

Baloney. A natural rock structure near Dogubayazit, Turkey, has been misidentified as Noah's Ark. Microscopic studies of a supposed iron bracket show that it is derived from weathered volcanic minerals. Supposed metal-braced walls are natural concentrations of limonite and magnetite in steeply inclined sedimentary layers in the limbs of a doubly plunging syncline. Supposed fossilized gopherwood bark is crinkled metamorphosed peridotite. Fossiliferous limestone, interpreted as cross cutting the syncline, preclude the structure from being Noah's Ark because these supposed "Flood" deposits are younger than the "Ark." Anchor stones at Kazan (Arzap) are derived from local andesite and not from Mesopotamia.

[@theworldthroughtheeyesof]

Yes there is another structure misidentified that the archeologists on this expedition looked at. I have another video on that archeological site. It is not on Mount Ararat but on the mountain range of Ararat some miles away. But the ark on top of the mountain is certainly made of wood. Others who have hiked up the mountain have observed fashioned wood pieces used for some sort of building material but were puzzled why it was on top of an ice cold mountain with no trees. They like many people, have never heard that the ark still exists and it is there. This included myself until a few years ago. I hope this information helped you answer some of the questions in your mind and that you can see more clearly why this is the ark of Noah. Remember this ship is not small and the photos they took from a shaky helicopter flying well above its recommended altitude, trying not to crash into the mountain itself are of course not the best photographs but it is still evident that this is a large structure made of wood on top of a mountain with no trees.

[@plainsman]

@@theworldthroughtheeyesof - It's also theologically bunk. The perspective offered by Answers in Genesis forces people to choose between the Bible and modern science, and reinforces the harmful cultural stereotype that modern science and biblical Christianity cannot mix. Sadly, Answers in Genesis is staking the authority of the entire Bible-and Christianity itself-on the view that a global flood is a viable alternative to abundant scientific evidence for a longer chronology of creation. To do so, they must add in many speculative details not found in the biblical text, such as the “biogeographical rafting model”. And they must rely on a theory of post-Flood animal evolution in which species diversify at rates many times faster than any known evolutionary mechanism. These theories, along with many others posited by young-earth creationists, are not based on credible scientific evidence; in fact, they contradict the clear evidence in God’s creation.

[@theworldthroughtheeyesof]

@@plainsman I don't know what "Answers in Genesis" wrote about, so I cannot write about their conclusions. Dr. Carl Baugh and scientists from all the different fields of study have a very sound and convincing analysis of how those events took place and their effects that can be observed. Furthermore, many decades ago, there was found decaying radioisotopes of nuclear decay frozen in time. Some of the stages seen only last few seconds to a few minutes, while others no more than 4 weeks. This showed that they must have been created in the beginning and that God as made things with an appears of age, as he did with Adam, the animals, trees, fowls, and the rest of creation. Nothing is contradictory about that and science has only proven these things. This I hope puts it in better perspective to how the world existed in the beginning according to what God has said and what we observe.

[@plainsman]

@@theworldthroughtheeyesof - Carl Baugh is a "Dr." of nothing, and fabricated his various alleged degrees out of thin air, mostly from nonexistent locations or unaccredited Bible schools. His "science" is preposterously erroneous, and wouldn't pass peer review in even the most sketchy scientific journal. Passing his bunk off as legitimate science is ridiculous. Even the conservative Creation Ministries International has cautioned against referencing Carl Baugh in arguments: "Sorry to say, we think that he’s well meaning but that he unfortunately uses a lot of material that is not sound scientifically. So we advise against relying on any ‘evidence’ he provides, unless supported by creationist organisations with reputations for Biblical and scientific rigour. Unfortunately, there are talented creationist speakers with reasonably orthodox understandings of Genesis who continue to promote some of the Wyatt and Baugh ‘evidences’ despite being approached on the matter."

[@theworldthroughtheeyesof]

@@plainsman If you always believe what Wikipedia has written, then you will more often than not reveal the error of trusting in the endless anonymous individuals that write such things, even at times for fun. Perhaps you are only doing so in like manner. For you have made claims based off of unverifiable evidence against this man and everyone that has worked on any of his projects, including scientists at various universities and other organizations, by which you are suggesting that they have conspired. I am wondering what evidence do you have to support your conspiracy theory?

[@alandean4863]

Quite literally...the devil is in the detail.... the original narrator (the one that comments first) accurately quotes genesis when he says .."mountains' of Arurat. From there on ithe video reeks of deception ...two words for anyone that wants to know..Ron Wyatt..

[@peterburgess5974]

Oh no. Ah, well I suppose if it makes people happy. Ad altiora!

[@stephenellis5729]

No

[@rodimusprime9599]

There are much more clear pics of the ark on the internet. It'd on google.

[@negativeone7151]

@12:14 I see a human eye

[@hornplayer1228]

Why do these idiots go exploring Mt Ararat when it is covered in snow? Ron Wyatt examined the Duprinar site in summer and his photos show the mountains completely free of snow. He spoke to locals who knew of a shelter and engraved stones depicting the flood event and Noah and his family.

[@theworldthroughtheeyesof]

That's because Ron Wyatt was on the wrong mountain about 20 miles across from Mount Ararat. Today Mount Ararat is always covered in snow towards the top. Dr. Carl Baugh with others dug at Ron Wyatt's proposed site of the ark and found nothing but buildings from the palace complex that was built during the reign of Timur in the 14th century. Hope that helps.

[@stephenellis5729]

Ron was a liar and a thief and so is his culty church

[@kimjohnson4278]

Ridiculous nonsense. Try some critical thinking. You'll be surprised that reality exists. 😊

[@newjusticemedia9874]

The Noah's Ark is Real, so get over it.

[@downyourtube]

This video is wrong. Noah's Ark is in Lake URMIA (u r missing in action).

[@louisrichards3702]

noahs ark doesn't not exists, it was broken up for building materials and firewood,,,nothing left to find..there was at one time a chapel on the mountain,made of stones and wood..

[@deepcosmiclove]

How do you know this? There is a chapel @ 14,000 feet above the tree-line? A chapel where nobody lives?

[@trinidadscorpion3835]

They find the Ark every year but in a different place. Believe in science and not religion.

[@maxsavage3998]

Its called disinformation misinformation and distractions. The devil is the one swaying people away from the true facts

[@paulhaynes3688]

Loved to have seen all those Dinosaurs lining up peacefully waiting to be checked in, it’s hilarious, polar bears and penguins airlifted in , no wonder children find it so funny.

[@michaelmckinney401]

I don't find it funny it happened there is zero pointing to atheist theory and all kinds of evidence of creation

[@paulhaynes3688]

@@michaelmckinney401 zero evidence of creation you just want to believe there is. Staggering amounts of evidence for evolution. You believe in a book that has talking animals, wizards, witches, demons , people walking on water, food falling from the sky, rising from the dead, sticks turning into snakes, dinosaurs coexisting with man, all sorts of absurd primitive stories. There are apparently over 5000 religions worshiped worldwide but don’t worry yours is obviously the right one. What happens to all the poor children born into the wrong one , hey I’m sure your man made god will look after them. Deluded

[@gsgidney]

I know Baugh, he is mistaken...as are all whi think it's ON the mountain. It's at the Duripinar site.

[@datacipher]

It’s so sad to see so may dullards still taken by proven liar and con-man Wyatt. Of all the countless places theorized as it’s location - if it exists - Ron Wyatt’s garbage is the one site we can absolutely discount. Debunked many times over. PS. Ron didn’t even discover that site … he popularized it and took credit for it

[@Spacekriek]

For one thing, the shape is wrong. It is more in the shape of a boat. People are looking for the ark of Noah. It is called ark because of the box like appearance. Compare the ark of the covenant.

[@spiritoftruth56]

The 'mountains of Ararat' is telling us that it didn't come to rest on the actual Mt. Ararat but that it came to rest somewhere around about the mountain! I'm afraid to say that Dr. Baugh wasted his time and effort as well as a considerable sum of money looking on the mountain of Ararat because the most likely resting place for the ark has been found and identified as such by Ron Wyatt. His discovery has been acknowledged by the Turkish authorities which have officially recognised the site as being where the remains of Noah's ark are situated. Ron Wyatt found tangible evidence ihat can be examined and which points to his discovery being valid.

[@theworldthroughtheeyesof]

This might come to your surprise but Ron Wyatt came to Dr. Carl Baugh and I have at least 8 witnesses that corroborate his story. Dr Baugh did an excavation on the site Ron Wyatt claimed it was at. There was nothing inside the so called ship. It was a palace fortress built by Tamerlane and the builders had used iron rivets to hold and reinforce the structures/buildings in place. The Turkish government also stopped recognizing Ron Wyatts site years ago as well. I have been there several times over the years and am well aware of what goes on there. All that Dr. Baugh claims about that area including the presence of Kurds are true and I know many of them there. In a documentary you can't put all of the details and that is what people forget. But one question to ask yourself as well, are photographs not evidence?

[@Spacekriek]

@@theworldthroughtheeyesof That is incredibly interesting to learn, the site not being recognized anymore and the former presence of a fortress on that site.

[@michaelk3582]

People have used that excuse forever, but the fact is it actually did land on the mountain of Ararat. I've even collected pictures at different seasonal times, actual photographs, which match his diagram at 10 minutes and 13 seconds of the broken upper half., And all of the pictures show it in the exact same spot.... Which I believe is the same spot as what they call the Ararat anomaly at the 16,000 ft level.

[@datacipher]

It’s so sad to see so may dullards still taken by proven liar and con-man Wyatt. Of all the countless places theorized as it’s location - if it exists - Ron Wyatt’s garbage is the one site we can absolutely discount. Debunked many times over. PS. Ron didn’t even discover that site … he popularized it and took credit for it.

[@nickma71]

The ark is not a ship/boat. The hebrew word is chest, box, coffin, and most fittingly, cage. Ship/boat does appear in the Bible, and it does not appear here. That is natural mudflow and there are many formations just like it in that exact area.

[@leuchtturmamrandderwelt5713]

Last year I found countless fossils in a pit. It was really awesome because I knew that a time was suddenly frozen and shattered into thousands of pieces. I felt sorrow, but when evil wanted to wipe out the last good thing on earth, God had no choice but to send the flood and carry the chosen ones over to a new age.

[@gregjones2217]

The fossils were probably marine and much older than the mythical flood. Those fossil beds exist in many places throughout the world and are from ages over 3.5 billion years to very recent times. All were local events. There was not a world event.

[@leuchtturmamrandderwelt5713]

@@gregjones2217 The world-shattering flood event at the mountains can be viewed. The immense water pressure pushed the continents apart and back together. Therefore the mountains are much larger and younger than can be explained by the normal continental drift. I myself saw layers like waves in the rocks when the material was still soft. Today everything is petrified and breaks like dishes.

[@gregjones2217]

@leuchtturmamrandderwelt5713 That is really about the stupidest thing I have heard in the 50 plus years I've studied geology. Only a total fool could possibly believe such childish nonsense. Go back to grade school and try again.

[@gregjones2217]

All that trouble to check out volcanic rocks. Just to try to prove an impossible imaginary fairy tale.

[@theworldthroughtheeyesof]

Is that because your mind is already made up or you require additional evidence? I suggest you read the Bible since it is from a person who witnessed those things; of the ark and the Flood. All other stories mix fact and fiction, which is easily identifiable, but if you so desire to read the many different versions of those events do so and you will see what I have written is true. I would also tell you is if that structure on that mountain isn't the ark it doesn't mean it didn't happen. Can you prove that the battle of Waterloo took place? Only from the writings of those who witnessed those things of course, if they be of a good and honest witness. Let us rightly divide the truth from those things which are not.

[@gregjones2217]

@theworldthroughtheeyesof1848 I prefer fact and proof and multiple accounts in many verifiable sources. Not a single account from a plagiarized text. Written in a storybook that is wrong or questionable on most accounts. As to the flood, there is no credible proof. That being true for most of your fairy tale. And, yes I read the bible twice. Along with most other religious texts. All are stories made up by unscrupulous men wanting to control the illiterate masses for their own benefit.

[@davidgardner863]

@@theworldthroughtheeyesof, Did Noah or any of his family members have a journal or keep a ship’s log that survived to this day? Then there was no witness.

[@gregjones2217]

@davidgardner86 It is hard to believe that there is no actual evidence of an imaginary event.

[@davidgardner863]

@@gregjones2217 Imaginary evidence for an imaginary event.

[@fordprefect5304]

We now have absolute that Noah was real. Evangelicals are still carrying the brain eating amoeba's that Noah saved.

[@paulhaynes3688]

That’s funny

[@BilobateMadusa]

Paradolia