The Sociotechnical Path to High-Performing Teams • Charity Majors • GOTO 2023

  Рет қаралды 15,590

GOTO Conferences

GOTO Conferences

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 7
@NeilHighley
@NeilHighley 11 ай бұрын
Very good talk. Development is about understanding the system and how to monitor the system. Also, the point about the effect we have on the team versus the effect the team has on us is extremely useful.
@kalmarnagyandras
@kalmarnagyandras 11 ай бұрын
1. AI doesn't solve any people problems, and technical problems are not the challenge. 2. AI/Robots can only take your work, if you're doing a robot's work. 3. Generative AI will also not take your work, because you can't encode intent and "sense" in a model. LLMs just spit out the most probable next word in a sequence.
@chris.dillon
@chris.dillon 11 ай бұрын
She's going to write another book and I will buy it. ❤
@barneylaurance1865
@barneylaurance1865 10 ай бұрын
This sounds like a very good path. I have a question about the key - given at 17:40 "if it's going to a place where real humans hit, that brings enough chaos to count". What counts as a real human hitting? Specifically does a person doing QA work on your software count as a real human, or do they only count if they're actually using the software as a tool to do something else. My situation is as a developer at a very small organisation where the main thing we do is run time limited annual online fundraising campaigns - and most of our traffic for the entire year comes in one week around the start of December. So it's hard to make sure real humans are hitting our code immediately after any work is done.
@prdoyle
@prdoyle 8 ай бұрын
I think Honeycomb is somewhat unique in that they are themselves the observability tool. That means they are exactly the thing their own devs use to tell whether their changes are working. They don't need to do any artificial QA work; they just use the tool.
@barneylaurance1865
@barneylaurance1865 8 ай бұрын
@@prdoyle Right. They make a tool that they also use extensively themselves. Observability isn't the only market where that's possible - e.g. the makers of Slack probably have discussions about how to make it on Slack, the makers of Facebook probably use Workplace by Meta (aka Facebook at Work) a lot, CircleCI probably use their own product. But there are indeed many more products that can't be used much for real by the people making them.
@simoroshka
@simoroshka 2 ай бұрын
to be honest, judging how good the team is by whether it does continuos deployment to production daily... seems wrong to me. It is not always the best option for a project.
What is Continuous Delivery?
5:51
IBM Technology
Рет қаралды 115 М.
What is OpenTelemetry?
12:55
Highlight
Рет қаралды 10 М.
НАШЛА ДЕНЬГИ🙀@VERONIKAborsch
00:38
МишАня
Рет қаралды 3,3 МЛН
Я сделала самое маленькое в мире мороженое!
00:43
버블티로 부자 구별하는법4
00:11
진영민yeongmin
Рет қаралды 28 МЛН
НИКИТА ПОДСТАВИЛ ДЖОНИ 😡
01:00
HOOOTDOGS
Рет қаралды 3,1 МЛН
The Joy of Building Large Scale Systems • Suhail Patel • YOW! 2023
44:53
A Comment on How We Learn • Aino Vonge Corry • YOW! 2015
40:19
GOTO Conferences
Рет қаралды 1 М.
The Turing Lectures: The future of generative AI
1:37:37
The Alan Turing Institute
Рет қаралды 615 М.
Hidden In Plain Sight: (Ab)Using Entra's AUs by Katie Knowles
28:01
Programming's Greatest Mistakes • Mark Rendle • GOTO 2023
51:24
GOTO Conferences
Рет қаралды 96 М.
Minimum Viable Architecture • Randy Shoup • YOW! 2022
47:40
GOTO Conferences
Рет қаралды 55 М.
Patterns of Effective Teams • Dan North • GOTO 2017
51:04
GOTO Conferences
Рет қаралды 118 М.
НАШЛА ДЕНЬГИ🙀@VERONIKAborsch
00:38
МишАня
Рет қаралды 3,3 МЛН