The Standard Model

[@piceofknowledge9296]

"What exactly is fire and what makes it glow?" *GREAT QUESTION TIMMY, LET'S LOOK AT THE STANDARD MODEL.*

[@bogadu]

I laughed hard at this!

[@hafizurrahmanfahim8820]

😂😂😂😂😂

[@DescubriendoPuertoRico]

RAZENOID!?!?!?!?!

[@Adam_Adamsky]

What is TV and what makes it glow?

[@tuanmach4772]

Timmy: Can we eat that?

[@fermilab]

Fermilab is NOT shut down. We shutdown one of our accelerators, the Tevatron, last fall but we are moving forward into the Intensity Frontier of particle physics. Come visit and see. We're close by!

[@Paradigm2012Shift]

Very Informative. Thanks for sharing. Best wishes, Lord-Jesus-Christ com

[@guffinator70]

I've been there twice, once in 1980 and again in 82...I think. I didn't really understand it at the time, but thanks to videos like this I have a much stronger grasp. I'm a fan, keep up the great vids.

[@anttumurikka8728]

must like this no matter what happen :D

[@anttumurikka8728]

how close you are now?

[@bruinflight]

I LOVE FERMILAB!!!!

[@ashar1122]

me: ok today imma go to sleep early my brain at 3 AM: wanna learn about subatomic particle physics and the nature of the universe itself?

[@Yukinasenpai]

Nice

[@player-mx7mn]

genius

[@evalsoftserver]

I believe the Standard model is incomplete and Pauli Exclusionary Principle can be violated because Superposition and Spooky Action at a Distance is real and it also must Violate E=mc2 and faster than light information communication, Fermi Dirac Distribution Fermi energies, Ultimately implies that the Wave function, Heininberg Uncertainty, Planck's Constant, And the Cosmological constant is incorrect

[@enderwigin7976]

My brain at 3am: let's check the fridge!

[@camelot544]

Big same

[@robih2313]

Thanks for existing, Fermilab

[@ertuqueque22]

After a good deal of trying to understand the Standard Model of quantum physics, this video has explained to me the final bits I needed to get my puzzle solved... This is probably the best (sort of dumbed-down) explanation of the Standard Model I've seen!

[@MsMumei]

Just gone back to studying physics and chemistry A-levels, after half a lifetime of art and philosophy:) Am loving it. It's a good change to have right or wrong answers, after so much subjectivity;) This guy has quickly become my 'go to' for great, personable explanations:) thankyou x

[@davedave6650]

Thanks Dr. Don.You have no idea how disarming your presentation is. You seem like one of the best spokepersons to explain why we need to keep funding this research. You've convinced me and (btw) I've always hated Theoretical Physics for it's lack of focus, inattention, and utter disregard to simply "building a better mouse trap".

[@roberthillier80]

This should be required watching for all children when they start high-school or even earlier if the parents can explain it properly.

[@sausagedankerschism]

agreed!

[@loganreidy7055]

Chloecybin I would of loved being taught this as a freshman.

[@justcallmesteve9123]

Hey! Im 15, and i filled ~50 pages with the information from theese videos! Its interesting! You can learn theese! It's such a wonderful feeling to get a little bit closer to understand, what happens around us, and why does it happen. I especialy like relativity, but i have to rewatch several parts of the videos. But it works! Im learning!

[@frostbite07]

I agree. I struggled with the basics of chemistry for a long time and this has actually solved most of my doubts about charge mass and behavior of different substances.

[@pameladoov7427]

@@loganreidy7055 I doubt you would understand it. You write "would of", instead of would have. No offence, pal, but that's the act of a moron.

[@delwoodbarker]

Thanks, Fermilab! I've been keeping up since I was a student reading Scientific American. Went there with my husband and his sister, they still talk about it after five years.

[@alecouto]

Standard Model very well explained in 8 minutes.. This must be some kind of World Record. Thank you!

[@rafakukua2784]

This is one of those videos where I scroll down a couple of times to make sure I pressed the like button

[@Eddy929292]

I really like Don Lincoln's presentations. They informative and very coherently constructed. Keep up the good work fermilab, I'm a big fan :)

[@btcam]

Such a useful video, I’m currently studying particle physics in high school and I was struggling to get my head around the whole idea. Thank you so much!

[@okman9684]

5:05 Yeah I was confused about the weak force. Like always physicists brush this off by saying "the weak force is responsible for some type of radioactivity". But now I got it after the new video of fermilab about the weak force and going in details about it.

[@rosemondphil-othihiwa3647]

One minute in and I have subscribed. FYI I am a lawyer but my curiosity brought me here. Time well spent!

[@mrclean2022]

Excellently and clearly simplified, thank you for making this video :)

[@markcianciolo9384]

Thank you for a wonderfully explanatory video. I recall hearing you on the old Milt Rosenberg radio show. How great those programs were. I'm an old Liberal Arts guy who is rediscovering science. As I read and watch each day, I am continually surprised and astonished at the macro and the micro. With Einstein and Quantum Physics, who needs Science Fiction?

[@xPolarGamingx]

I never really knew the role of bosons, now I know they're the forces, every video or documentary I watch teaches me something knew or makes me think about something differently than I've done before, thank you fermilab

[@rifleman2c997]

Amazing how much discovered and changed in the time of this video.

[@IKMCDANIEL]

Dude, you rock! There are lots of people on KZbin who crush it, but you take it to the next level. Thanks!!

[@stevestanley4518]

Very much appreciated . Not too dumber down not too difficulty for anyone willing to make an effort. Thank you

[@savcob6291]

..so your children ask these questions ? the only questions is I hear is "Who took the xbox controller again " Why didnt you charge it ?"

[@AumchanterPiLetsPlay]

What about "When can I have that DLC heavy triple A game for the price of a quiet night out Dad?"

[@luizhbr]

Thanks a lot for the subtitles in English, they make the google translator very easy for other languages.

[@VinayakaHalemane]

Awesome job with the explanation. This is sci comm at its best. Doesn't dumb down anything, gives an honest look at the current situation and uses good analogies to make it easier to the lay viewer.

[@TANTRASIUM]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/eXjbeneYpremfbs The theory of everything | The standard model of particle physics Watch till the end ang share if found informative

[@tresajessygeorge210]

THANK YOU PROFESSOR LINCOLN...!!! It was like a review for me ...since I have learned first from you and then from others too...!!! Still keep on reviewing to make sure ...and remind myself of the terminology...!!!

[@pyroslasher]

Good lord...I did Chem, Bio and Math for A levels and always regretted not doing Physics. Never understood the standard model and the reason why in this age of information is any video I watch starts off with a ten minute history lesson, then they mention the sub atomic particles and then go into quantum mechanics and confuse themselves and me just because they want to say "quantum mechanics". This video is the first I've seen that simply explains it beautifully... Thank you so much!

[@hainejung]

This was explained so clearly! Happy to say that I now finally understand the standard model.

[@bitm5245]

Your videos help me start on topics I dont know where to start with.

[@troyc382]

Excellent illustration & explanation of the standard model, thanks

[@lancelot1953]

Excellent presentation! I am reassured that there still some "secrets" to be discovered and questions to be answered (for my grand-children that is). Thank you, Ciao, L

[@abrahamjohn1655]

This channel is a gem

[@andreferreira2693]

That's actually one of the best videos about this subject, I don't have a deep knowledge on physics although I have lot o curiosity and interest on it, even with my little knowledge I could understand the main idea behind the concepts and want to learn even more about it!

[@israelasala1351]

the best video found that tackles of fundamental particles. Looking forward for more videos

[@HongXiuYing]

I love videos like this. Filled with information and very well made. Thank you! (But I am greedy... I want more!) ;)

[@varunnrao3276]

I really don't understand force by particle exchange. 1. How does attraction work 2. Wouldn't the particle get exhausted by emitting exchange particles, even when the receiving particle is not there, if it only emits the exchange particle when the other particle is there, then how does is come to know about it.

[@procerator]

Those are called virtual particles and they are just mathematical abstraction.

[@AbdulWahid-jl4ut]

Hi.....

[@WestOfEarth]

So here's my best explanation. I think it's more helpful to think of the 'particle' as a wave packet. Take the gluon for example. The gluon has a mass/energy nearly as large as a single atom of gold. But when a gluon is bound within a system of quarks, it creates a wave 'trough' or potential energy well. The quarks attract each other because they lie at the lowest energy point of this gluon well. For the quarks to be split apart requires sufficient energy to overcome this gluon potential energy well. And as I mentioned, that energy is huge - comparable to the mass / energy of single gold atom.

[@evalsoftserver]

It's not force boson fermions or Particle exchange , but Rather all Force particle exsist as a Unifiable Field and it's Fields Vibration or spin is what's we called Force and, It's Orientation is what we call Quarks ,Electron ,proton Photon or basic particle matter building blocks

[@bruinflight]

How did you get fire in your hand like that without getting burned?

[@ronaldderooij1774]

Sho says it was fire? Or that it was hot?

[@MeloettaMarmalade]

You didn't know? All scientists know magic

[@christopheribarra1170]

This are the types of questions that are fun to think about.

[@SonGojit456]

@@MeloettaMarmalade There s No Such Thing As Magic.

[@MeloettaMarmalade]

@@SonGojit456 whoosh

[@prabinbhandari578]

Thanks for the extraordinary explanation.

[@chemistryuntold]

That was an Amazing Explanation Sir

[@saragct1]

That is one of the amazing videos. Thanks.

[@johnmcevoy1840]

Thanks for the video - it helped answer some of my queries on the atomic make up....which has puzzled me during the O.U. course I am doing. Its a good job gravity force is so small - otherwise I would be much heavier - its bad enough now trying to loose weight.

[@ehlimanehliman]

But your mass still would be same, assuming the universe would still exist.

[@Nuke_Skywalker]

thank you, i finally get the standard model thanks to your explanation.

[@adriancoronel5119]

Very good explanation,thanks very much,greetings from México.

[@RenuVerma-mo6xc]

This is the vedio I was looking since long time thankyou so much for uploading this 🥺🥺😢

[@abhishekkumar-mz5px]

Next level simplification is…thank you Sir.

[@TANTRASIUM]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/eXjbeneYpremfbs The theory of everything | The standard model of particle physics Watch till the end ang share if found informative

[@izea816]

You are really good at what you do. Thanks for the refresher

[@ganymede242]

Upvote for proper pronunciation of 'quark'.

[@Voivode.of.Hirsir]

Kwark

[@Jehannum2000]

It rhymes with Mark. End of story (Finnegan's Wake).

[@hellegennes]

@@Jehannum2000 There's no apostrophe in Finnegans Wake.

[@the_main_dane]

Well done. Your analogies are top notch!!!

[@19750bob]

Fantastic vid. I knew the model by heart, but this really explains it nicely. Wish I had this when I learnt it, brilliant.

[@hkbnlb]

Yes I finally understand the Standard Model! I subscribed 👍

[@evalsoftserver]

I believe the Standard model is incomplete and Pauli Exclusionary Principle can be violated because Superposition and Spooky Action at a Distance is real and it also must Violate E=mc2 and faster than light information communication, Fermi Dirac Distribution Fermi energies, Ultimately implies that the Wave function, Heininberg Uncertainty, Planck's Constant, And the Cosmological constant is incorrect

[@boblowney]

if your kids ask those types of questions, you are a great dad!

[@rockanderson1823]

Good stuff !! You explain complicated subjects in a simple way. I "wish" you would do a video on Electromagnetism. I understand the words, "a photon" has two fields, electric field and magnetic field; but I think you could make the concept more intuitive.

[@ThomasJr]

I loved the blooper. Dr Don rocks!

[@donvargo614]

Why is the down quark considered fundamental when, during beta decay, it breaks down to an up quark, an electron, and a neutrino?

[@jakewilson487]

Break down isnt really the right way of putting it. The weak force can essentially change the flavour (type) of particle, and if it changes from a high energy particle to a lower energy particle then other particles will be created using the left over energy

[@joto4294]

Excellent, lucid, understandable lecture

[@FlipCereal]

Don is great at explaining and teaching!

[@joppadoni]

If gravity is a space time bending then at the lowest, smallest measurements, then surely you would understand the direction of the force would be negligible against a space time curve and hence it wouldn't apply. Its like resistance of something massive with huge momentum ignoring gravity. Imagine a bending ruler, then focus in on the centre. The closer you get to it the straighter the edges look. Eventually everything travels in a straight line, always.

[@msidhard]

like it

[@justinemaerefuerzo9425]

nice

[@mookiestewart3776]

joppadoni this is a cool thought but it's based on the premise of a center existing in the first place. space time does not have a center , so the idea of a direction of the force of gravity doesn't exactly exist.

[@joppadoni]

indeed, the deeper you go in to a mass the flatter space time becomes, hence no central point, thats why gravity reduces the further you dig a deep, deep, deep hole in to, say the earth. but i dont think that matters, the distances become so tiny. only in black holes would that curvature become a feature, or rather an effect. i think it is here that the answers will be found to link the two.

[@pratiknath2532]

You are a scientist but yet you deliver lecture from Such point of view that even who hasn't studied it will get it😍😇

[@TANTRASIUM]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/eXjbeneYpremfbs The theory of everything | The standard model of particle physics Watch till the end ang share if found informative

[@laficks]

I think Don’s fingertips have the strong force. They keep connecting. Could he speak if he did not touch them together?

[@ASLUHLUHC3]

Is the Higgs boson officially now part of the Standard Model?

[@beachboardfan9544]

Holy hell I wish this channel existed when I was in school

[@elliellama5629]

I love your way to explain. Thanks for the videos

[@nini1957]

I have a few questions 😁 Does gravity affect all sizes of particles? Even Higgs Boson? Am I the only person who believes that there is no end to how “small” or “elemental” something can be?

[@mrmadmaxalot]

I love the fact that gravity waves have now been detected. It shows the continual change and progress of science. :)

[@GabriellaMickel]

I can't wait until I'm far enough into my education to learn and understand the math and experimentation behind subatomic particle physics :D I'M SO EXCITED (and impatient) ...just thought I'd mention that because this video reminded me to be curious and ask questions :)

[@youssh4975]

So, after 6 years, is your passion still burning? Just curious

[@KevinJC1991]

so the higgs boson gives particles mass, but isn't that what gravity does? could higgs and gravitons be the same thing? I've always seen gravity demonstrated as a bowling ball on a mattress causing marbles to fall into its depression, so is the mattress in that example representing the higgs field?

[@moriendus]

Great video. Thank you very much.

[@torgranstedt5935]

why is no one talking about how Don just firebended on video? What really is going on at fermilab?

[@MrErneyj]

The example at 6:28 lets me to understand repulsive forces but it doesn't explain attractive forces. Electromagnetism is repulsive for a pair of charges where both are positive or where both are negative, but is an atractive force for a pair os charges where one is positive and the other is negative. Where can I find an example to understand atractive forces?

[@ZenMasterChip]

Interference patterns can create the appearance of movement such that constructive or destructive interference shift the location of the particle by destructive (lower energy) or interfering and cancelling the trailing end of the waves that make up the particle, while simultaneously constructively interfering to create the new front that makes up the particle thus attractive. or by the conjugate of that a repulsive. It's always an interference pattern, waves interacting with waves, whether attractive or repulsive depends upon how the waves combine to create the destructive interference or constructive interference, in relation to the non force particles and forces in play. Destructive on the first wave front and Constructive immediately after the falling back edge is repulsive; Constructive ahead of the leading wave front, and destructive on the falling back edge is attractive. We only get the real interesting stuff when dealing with higher energy state forces closer to nuclei like in quarks. That's a whole other ball of wax but basically forces have local privileges based on proximity where they are stronger than other forces and what constitutes a higher or lower energy state.. So, the first paragraph was for one dimension, for another, dealing with conjugate pairs of vectors... we find. Positive or negative is also a phase force vector function, with (1 particle being + & the other -) the forces being destructive phase amplitude cancelling conjugates creating an energy well (and thus particles move toward each other, toward the lower energy state), whereas + & + or - & - are phase constructive amplitude additive energy states (and thus particles move away from each other, or toward anywhere but the higher energy states between them. So basically, opposites are real and complex sum of squares conjugates and energy cancelling states, whereas same sign are same space 'real' and 'real' sum of squares complementary energy additive states and particles always seek lowest local energy states anywhere but where the energy is doubled. Plus the first paragraph, with both, a very complex constructive and destructive interference package. Add enough particles, and computers even give up the ghost. :-)

[@sausagedankerschism]

+Chip Cooper thanks, now I have something to study (:

[@flavianomanfis]

Dear Don Lincoln, could you, please, elaborate on how particle exchange can explain the action of forces? For example, it is easy to see the repulsion as it was demonstrated in this video, but how about the attractive forces, how do we explain with particle exchange? Would the boat have to through a sack away from person on the shore? How does particle conservation apply to this context?

[@sureshdhabsa5634]

Sir I have a question.i think gravity is weakest force because it may be using other particles to emit gravity or gravitational waves just like conductor or inductor concept is it possible?

[@sureshdhabsa5634]

Plzzz someone respond me

[@scottnathens6377]

Concise. Is the planetary model thingy an appropriate time to mention Rutherford and Bohrs' conceptions (prior knowledge)? At least until 1987?, undergraduate chemistry, physics courses did not mention the SM; and it, of course, made it into no hs texts. Why not?

[@berniv7375]

Thank you for an excellent video.🔬

[@MorrisBenton48]

Question: Einstein, with general relativity, replaced "action at a distance" with space curvature defined by massive objects like the sun. What about charge (electric force) or the nuclear force? Is there an equivalent space curvature model for these? Or do we handle these fundamentally different?

[@jovaransguplar3019]

I have an important question that's been bugging me. When he explains how bosons serve has particles that bounce between two other particles, the image of the guys playing catch on the shore shows that it pushes them further apart. But it's supposed to be what keeps particles together? I'm trying to wrap my head around how that works

[@iridium8562]

Jovarans Guplar i believe it’s way way more complicated than that, it’s just an overly simplified example, I urge you not to overthink overly simplified examples as it won’t really help

[@shauncarriere779]

He's only stating that the bozons apply a force when they move. The example is just to understand the idea. It doesn't mean they move apart

[@mr88cet]

Hey Don, a question: I seem to recall that: 1. The Theory of the W-boson is that it is the boson unifying the electro-weak and strong forces, and that... 2. The W-boson Theory also predicts that, phenomenally rarely, protons decay, and that... 3. An experiment in Kameoka, Japan collected together enough protons (in the form of water) in a huge underground pit, such that, statistically, after a few years, they should have detected a proton decay, and that... 4. They did not detect such a proton decay, conceptually disproving the W-boson Theory. Am I remembering all of that (any of that perhaps?) correctly?

[@spandandhungana5199]

Its the first video i have watched from this channel n i subscribed ...😃😀

[@mememasterpro3105]

DOUBTS 1)so can i safey say that an electron is made up of 3 down quarks as then only the net resultant charge will be -1 2)and also how do we derive the charge of the quark is there a formula or is it completely hit and trial 3)can we split quarks like normal atoms with processes like fission and fusion at the quark level 4)how do the neutrinos remember their origin is there any explanationto that 5)can there be only 3 up quarks or will that just be 2 protons 6) please name combinations with other 4 types and do they have a charge

[@sergiosanchezpadilla1418]

6:56 I got a bit lost. What are those 4 particles? Protons, neutrons, electrons and... photons I guess?

[@DavidPhi88]

Should the quarks, leptons, boson and forces be considered as making up all there is? As in, should they be considered as exhaustively being the building blocks of all reality?

[@biomerl]

I imagine a world where we slowly learn to manipulate and control smaller realms of matter. From chemistry and nano-tech today which harnesses and arranges atoms, to perhaps one day being able to control and manipulate these quarks and other particles, to whatever is inside/hidden under them when we learn to manipulate them. I hope the trail never ends... or stops getting smaller.

[@TirtaLeonardi]

I have a question, since all things are made of proton neutron electron, and now we know it are based on smaller building blocks explained by the standard model, where do all this particles come from? Can we build these particles, thus we can somewhat create something out of nothing?

[@lawrencedoliveiro9104]

1:18 The trouble with terms like “element” and “atom” is that, almost as soon as we give them to something, we discover that that thing is not so “elementary” or “atomic” after all, and can be broken down into smaller pieces ...

[@Agoodguy1122]

Edit Don Lincoln (born 1964) is an American physicist, author, host of the KZbin channel Fermilab, and science communicator. He conducts research in particle physics at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory and is an adjunct professor of physics at the University of Notre Dame.[1] He received a Ph.D. in experimental particle physics from Rice University in 1994. In 1995, he was a codiscoverer of the top quark.[2] He has coauthored hundreds of research papers and, more recently, was a member of the team that discovered the Higgs boson in 2012.[3.....from wikipedia......(sir,, take my salute)

[@kennethchow213]

In Kenneth W. Ford's "101 Quantum Questions", 2011, p.186, he said " A particle acts as a particle when it is created and annihilated(emitted and absorbed) and acts as a wave in between......we just have to give up the idea that a photon is a particle at any moment other than the moments of its birth and death". For Muon, Tau, Lambda, Sigma,Omega, Pion , Eta and kaon, etc., this moment of birth and death is extremely short : from 10^-6 second to 10^-20 second. So, should it be a Standard Model of particle physics or a Standard Model of wave physics ?

[@PhysicsHigh]

great explanation

[@sengelbr]

Forces are really the exchange of particles? Does that mean forces are quantized and not continuous? If you block the force particles then the force disappears? What is the rate of exchange of force particles? Does a subatomic particle have an infinite number of force particles available to "emit" and how could that be possible?

[@LightDiodeNeal]

Wow always great to revisit, wow is it that long. Thanks Dr Don and the Fermilab-YT-Team, every video is an honour to see, educational and entertaining. Will a Lepto-Quark be found ever? :-) NEAL

[@MaxwellDoesStuff]

Imma be honest this was way better than Wikipedia for someone like me who has no idea what their doing thx

[@pranayg6270]

Can you do another video of the standard model with the recent discoveries?

[@pranavrao2188]

Hey

[@pranavrao2188]

U got into IIsc

[@pranavrao2188]

Can I ask how to get in and tips plz

[@dq405]

Thank you for posting this video.

[@lijukunchandynellimootilho5037]

What came before big bang? From where the particles quarks leptons?? Etc.. came? How the first singularity was formed? If there is multiple singularity what was its origin?

[@echoesofsilence22]

my brain at 2 am: **What exactly is fire and why does it glow**

[@andrewstrausbaugh4517]

how does this only have 100K views? I think everyone should be required to watch this.

[@AjayKumar-fx2yj]

Thank god u Made a video sir otherwise I was in confusion

[@goldibollocks]

If the Higgs boson has to do with mass, does it also play a role in gravity? Or is there like a fifth force that interacts with Higgs bosons granting gravity?

[@perikala.rahulpriyadarsana2452]

my doubt is if we disturbed the field of gluone (which keeps protons together in nuclei ) enough and send bare protons to it is there any chance to achive fussion

[@chilakashalemraju3668]

Excellent presentation sir

[@scottalbers2518]

Hi, and I would like to ask: I would like to take a shot at some of the problems presented, but to whom would I send my approach?

[@bennymarshall1320]

The sack and boat analogy explains repulsion but what about attraction?

[@jebiniahthistle4929]

just found this channel. awesome.