The Story NPR Refused to Run

According to psychologist Dr. Robert Epstein, he does not have a conservative bone in his body. However, through his work, he discovered something that not even NPR would write a story on.
Only DailyWire+ members can watch the full episodes of my podcast. Join here: bit.ly/3kj7pOd
LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos every day. / @michaelknowles
Watch the full episode here: • "They Control Billions...
Stop giving your money to woke corporations that hate you. Get your Jeremy’s Razors today at ihateharrys.com
You've seen it played on The Michael Knowles Show, and now you can play YES-or-NO at home. Get it here: bit.ly/45pOROm
Already have the YES-or-NO game? Get your hands on the Conspiracy Expansion Pack before it sells out! bit.ly/3PaR0be
#MichaelKnowles #TheMichaelKnowlesShow #News #Politics #DailyWire #NPR #DrRobertEpstein #RobertEpstein #DrEpstein #Google #Election #Rigged #Voting #GoogleSearch #Bias

[@McsMark1]

NPR doesn't allow comments to it's Twitter account. That says it all.

[@ianmc87]

PBS doesn't allow comments on its content on KZbin. Typical of the left.

[@mcconn746]

If I question a political issue, I check the mainstream media and do the opposite.

[@ericbaumgartner6558]

I check what Obama says and do the opposite!

[@mcconn746]

@@ericbaumgartner6558 LOL Good point. Basically the mainstream media is regurgitating what Obama says.

[@hertzair1186]

Exactly my edict.

[@christinemilner9794]

Me too!

[@runmarkrunheinrich]

Explains the flat earthers right there.

[@mudpuddle8805]

Defund NPR.

[@Brian-uy2tj]

Vote Biden 2024!

[@mudpuddle8805]

@@Brian-uy2tj I'll pray for you, lost one.

[@Brian-uy2tj]

@@mudpuddle8805

[@jonkirkwood469]

NPR in one sentence: "You don't need a conspiracy when interests converge." George Carlin

[@johnpalmer5131]

Well said and profound..I truly miss George Carlin😢

[@user-pp5iy6ur8s]

@@johnpalmer5131. Yeah, but he had blinders on for big government, or was complicit. He said such things as, “There’s no money in homelessness.” In CA a single publicly built homeless domicile, for a single family, is $1 million a piece. Big $$$ in homelessness.

[@mattschrader5047]

When self interests converge. Some common interests are mutually beneficial.

[@petebondurant58]

George Carlin was a liberal Democrat, and would be screeching against Trump, just like all of the others of his ilk.

[@markvandoren3387]

National Propaganda Radio (NPR) needs to fund itself.

[@halholland1637]

Them and CCPBS also.

[@chrisrichardson8988]

I believe NPR is less than 20% funded by government.

[@jeffa847]

All assets including IP - then fraud trials then those that aren't in jail can go find private funding

[@dormilon36]

And Google! 😂

[@Tregrense]

NPR is less than perfect, has been better and we need it to thrive. Just as much we need the currently lame republican party to survive. I'm off to re-read Dwight D. Eisenhower's Farewell Address and you are welcome to join me...

[@loishendricks9720]

This is how we create an Idiocracy. Everyone is extremely sure of what they know and it’s all wrong.

[@Toograced]

I live in a city where these very kind of people are so enamored by themselves, and how intelligent they believe themselves to be.

[@jameshayden3952]

I know Joe Biden is corrupt and in mental decline and I'm not wrong.

[@Zubeneshemali]

There IS a small minority whose humble confidence in facts are continually reassured!!

[@markmilich8656]

I’ve listened to NPR for most of my life … on and off … and nearly daily for the last 20 years. I have loved the wide range of reporting they do and, while I found myself more and more frequently disagreeing with their positions, I still tended to see them as professional news “reporters” who tried to present both sides of any issue factually without bias. Even when they leaned left I listened with attention because I like to hear all sides to make sure I understand the issues. I’m not sure exactly when they began to change but gradually I found myself more and more discontent and disagreeing with them more and more adamantly. I’ve come to see them as activists representing only the far left and woke causes. I get the sense that more and more of their journalists are actually drawn from far left minority groups and woke communities. They have little if any main stream American representation. They are openly disparaging of the center and center right. Forget any even handed, non-disparaging reporting of anything coming from the right. Their bias has become so obvious I often have to turn off the radio because I simply can’t listen anymore. They have written off over 50% of the population as unworthy of their consideration. Their arrogance is infuriating. Are there ANY journalistic organizations out there with enough integrity and confidence in the American people to provide the unbiased facts and data we need to MAKE DECISIONS FOR OURSELVES!!! I have little respect for NPR now. I listen to them to understand how the enemy thinks. They are worse than FOX and just as obviously biased. FOX more closely represents my views but I have to listen very closely and I can take NOTHING they say at face value. What this man has to say doesn’t surprise me at all. No wonder our society is at each other’s throats! No wonder there is so much hate, discontent and division. There is no one to trust and you can’t have any confidence in the information you’re getting.

[@DJJ81]

I stopped using google years ago because it was so obvious the bias they had. It was plain as day, and I don’t understand how anyone doesn’t see it and isn’t immensely frustrated with it.

[@thefullnessoftruthapostola8328]

Same here. I replaced Google with DuckDuckGo and StartPage.

[@benjaminguilatcoiv]

I just don't use their search engine ( well except on YT on this platform bec it's theirs ) ..but for general search i don't use it.

[@bunsmom]

I learn how to bypass their bias by simply skipping the first several pages sometime up to 50 pages. I have drug damage by a FDA approved drug. To find published studies I had to use the chemical letters and bypass anything relating to the word Lyrica . I found a lot of studies stating exactly what I was dealing with.

[@toonybrain]

Further, Google is so immensely dumbed down.

[@ColdPotato]

They have the skill and potential to be a great news organization. But they choose not to be.

[@stuartyablon7184]

and that makes all the difference. Narrative trumps all, including reality.

[@mattschrader5047]

They are primarily funded by the Government. Literally the definition of state sponsored media. That relationship alone makes it impossible for PBS to remain neutral or unbiased regarding any content they air. They are by nature a partisan political organization since only one side of the aisle supports their funding and that leverage over the content they produce is obvious. They should be defunded as they only serve the left which is unconstitutional by definition.

[@andrewberna4045]

They honestly used to be but major donors have destroyed that the past 15 years.

[@proudtobepaganandheathen.8466]

NPR not sure what nation they represent or what people

[@jfkst1]

They represent Marxists in the US. Which is a large percentage of people.

[@jerrybrickley2115]

Simple. Don't waste your time listening to NPR.

[@ThatGratefulGuy]

They represent the interests of the ruling class of Americans.

[@user-uz5ig9wf4b]

They are the propagandists for the one world communist government.

[@martinsundland7614]

As opposed to say, Fox? Good luck.

[@frogsoda]

Algorithms are written by people and AI is just a complicated algorithm. Its all biased.

[@ohsweetmystery]

So obvious. I don't understand this guy claiming that we all think algorithms are 'objective'. Gullible people maybe.

[@TuhljinTampergauge]

@@ohsweetmysteryMost people ARE gullible, so....

[@SperoinDeo]

@@ohsweetmystery. Maybe? Did you live through Covid?

[@xisotopex]

its a glorified auto fill.

[@benjaminguilatcoiv]

Yes‼️ And if people trust an algorithm as if it's possessed of some "wisdom" then it's clear that so many people have been dumbed down beyond any human redemption.

[@user-uz5ig9wf4b]

Defund PBS and NPR !!!!

[@cahg3871]

So does the CBC in Canada.They are bought and paid for by the federal government,they spew his thoughts on how Canada needs to be.The propaganda machine of Pm Justin Trudeau.

[@Maintain_Decorum]

This!! ⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️

[@scottdenley2022]

I've never received a reminder to vote from Google.

[@jeffkirk4761]

I found this bizarre. Why is Google spending shareholders money to remind anyone to vote?

[@The_Lord_has_it]

"Hey Google AI, let's learn a new game called rule the world. Here's access to everyone's data on the planet and all of human knowledge. GO"

[@robertlogan9888]

😂😂😂😂 So, NPR needs to be defunded.

[@jerrybrickley2115]

Trump could shut it down overnight with a simple Executive Order.

[@JerryBearry]

They behave as badly as those terrible tenured professors. Also, defund the teachers union.

[@biketech60]

It's largely private public funded . The government contributes something like 15% of their budget . People need to awaken & using Google is counterproductive .

[@blackrock1961]

NPR only gets about 15% of it's funding from government. They could probably figure out a way to survive without that 15%. So, you're right.

[@mattschrader5047]

​@@blackrock1961 NPR receives 320 million dollars annually from our Federal Government. Their total operating budget annually is around 500 million dollars. We fund about 73% of NPR. They lie about that figure intentionally so taxpayers don't realize how much state funded propaganda is costing us. So no, they wouldn't "find another way". Defund PBS and they disappear overnight as they should.

[@wisenber]

Not sure when he did the study, but I noticed search engine bias years ago. Then again, in grad school we were taught that every source has a bias, and it's up to you to determine what it is and how it's trying to sway you. Bias doesn't have to be intentional to exist.

[@corrinadeluxe4141]

Who knew Michael would be the bridge between libs & trads ?!? Always calm & intent on hearing his subjects points of view. Bravo 👏

[@HDHQDIRECT]

Last time i listened to NPR, AM radio was still a thing.

[@ozziecrosby2092]

Same here. And I STILL changed the channel

[@sameash3153]

Brother, AM radio still is a thing

[@kellyross4801]

That's where the conservatives are. 😁

[@HDHQDIRECT]

@@kellyross4801 They sure aren't watching fake cable news.

[@ozziecrosby2092]

@@kellyross4801 Not even close

[@skepto-o-punk8286]

“It is extremely hard to publish in peer reviewed journals” he says, as I recall Lindsay, Boghossian and Pluckrose’s publishing of 7 insane fake papers in peer reviewed journals.

[@xisotopex]

published because those papers pushed a narrative they agreed with...

[@realdealz39]

@@xisotopexExactly.

[@mattschrader5047]

It's only hard to get published in peer reviewed journals if your findings go against the political orthodoxy of your "peers". If it supports Globalist government narratives then it isn't hard at all. In fact plagiarism are overlooked as long as your findings prop up policy.

[@danielwessel9884]

I am trying to wrap my head around being aware of biased search results and preferring it anyway. That certainly isn't my thought process.

[@ohsweetmystery]

Agreed. I think they were using not very smart people as subjects in their studies. And I do think that simply being willing to participate in studies is a sign of weak personality and lower intelligence.

[@lillybet4683]

I'm not surprised. I live in CA. I know liberals who have seen what dems have done to our state and still support the dems and their failed policies. They complain about high taxes, mismanagement of every government program, high prices and hig crime rates, homelessness and housing. But come November they vote Democrat. Again. They don't like the results they get but yet they refuse to vote any other way. This isn't just a handful of people either. It's so many people it's mind boggling. It's almost as though they can't see the correlation between their vote and the people their vote puts in office. I just don't get it.

[@AlwaysPeacefulMaDeuce]

Implicit bias is a powerful drug.

[@jerrybennett6034]

The recommendation for contractor work is to get 3-to-5 bids. Depending on the search I will use 3-to-5 different search engines. Over the last few years, I have seen similar results from all other search engines, but the Google search results are always radically different, and not in a good way.

[@RobertMiller-ph6fs]

Trumps conviction is a foregone conclusion then...hopefully he can overcome this charade

[@friedawells6860]

It actually makes perfect sense when you see the way that Overton's window has been absolutely racing to the left since the rise of google in the 2000s.

[@jimbo2834]

👍

[@Vulpas]

This explains why so many people are now identifying with the rainbow.

[@LizsLargeBull]

😂 two gay conservatives just chatting like sisters! Sizzle, republican party, Sizzle

[@GallowsPole805]

Today I identify as a pterodactyl. Tomorrow… most likely a non binary, pan sexual, gender fluid, asexual, bi curious, transgender marshmallow.

[@Vulpas]

@@LizsLargeBull They really put the CON is conservative then.

[@michellecalhoun2527]

I've been telling everyone I know for years.... if you want to know what's happening, then read the same story from 10-12 outlets, find the nuggets of similarity they all share, and then you can easily see who is biased and who is trying to manipulate you.

[@dantedelpin9937]

But it must be so much easier to be a lib and only read headlines

[@michellecalhoun2527]

@@dantedelpin9937 I don't think so. The ones I know are struggling now too. Imagine being a good person at heart and having believed the media completely for the last few years. There's some serious cognitive dissonance happening to people and it's a physically painful process.

[@googlesux666]

If they claim they see bias and go with it, they don't see it. They were already on that side.

[@michellecalhoun2527]

There are objective facts that don't change (despite Horkheimer's claims). It's the x, y, and z of how things happened, and those things are not subjective. The bias arises at the situation when one outlet wants its viewers to believe that x happened because of a, b, or c and that is what they highlight instead of giving the straight facts. Another outlet wants to highlight y and blame d, e, and f. Before long, you have a media sh**storm with everyone making wild claims about a, b, c, d, e, and f, without hardly mentioning x, y, z. There's always a formula at the network. Once you see the pattern, you can't unsee it.

[@frogsoda]

@@michellecalhoun2527 Everyone goes thru it. I did 40 years ago. and calling it "physically painful" is an insult to anyone that every felt Actual. Physical. Pain.

[@RetroRobotRadio]

I have purposely asked AI questions on tribal topics I know... they often get things wrong. I even found an AI that thinks a TV show existed in the 1980 that never existed. It told me who was in it, names of episode, airdates, etc. All fabricated from its nonsense.

[@jjdillon1207]

Is it on Netflix?

[@backyardrebel2149]

Sounds like the book, 1984, only with AI.

[@thefullnessoftruthapostola8328]

@@backyardrebel2149 AI doesn't need to be right. It only needs to promote the correct political/social views. You don't need a brain to be a liberal; in fact, it only gets in the way.

[@BIGHEADjr51]

Title should read: The stories NPR Refused to Run

[@prometheusrex1]

Should read: Michael Knowles is annoying AF.

[@jmachatch6696]

I was stupid growing up! BUT, my parents taught me my moral compass and stressed the importance of the truth of the Bible. In 1984, I read Orwell. It gave me enough knowledge and paranoia to keep that moral compass sturdily in my hand.

[@Toograced]

My dad is Buddhist, my mom was a Scientologist, my best friends were Hindu. But when I was 29, I heard the voice of God call me by name, not once, but twice, and before I could figure out what was going on, my lips spoke without me..."Lord" The God of the Bible, Himself, began reeducating me in accordance with His truth, the only truth that matters. I began to see that everything I was sure of, was opposite what was written in the bible. When I learned what perversion was, I realized you can not get any further from God, than to go in the complete opposite direction. That is why this world hates God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit. This world rejects God and embraces satan whole heartedly.

[@jmachatch6696]

@@Toograced Thank you for sharing your story. That is wonderful!!!

[@RetroRobotRadio]

As a person who knows a lot of a few obscure topics, I know the Internet gives me bad information on those topics. Why would it be more correct on topics I don't know? For instance I collect obscure 1970s toys. I can find outright fabrications on this topic in most Google searches and Wikipedia immediately. Some are seeing accidents. Others are lies or jokes made by other people knowledgeable on the topic.

[@Mustapha1963]

I'd also suggest that not a few of those stories are probably 'written' by AI. I downloaded an app called "Newsbreak" to my phone a while back and one thing I've noticed is that quite a few of the stories have a jarring syntax. Odd word choices, unclear references and irrelevant points abound. And then there are outright errors, errors that, if you're anything more than slightly informed on the topic, are obvious. Often, if you scroll down to the bottom, you'll see a blurb along the lines of "This story written with the assistance of AI."

[@Usernamexxxxxxxx]

70’s toys were so cool… worth every scar and third degree burn!

[@zang9147]

Adam Carolla has a similar story about an interview with NPR. He was waiting for a predictable gotcha question and the interviewer looked deflated at his answer which dismissed the imagined issue. Interview never aired.

[@DasWaldCafe]

You should have this guy on blast with his research findings all the time. I commend him for being honest about his findings rather than just covering them up.

[@w8biatvrepeater638]

NPR: Never Probably Right

[@Guokas0422]

I used to think human imperfection was the ability to do what's wrong, despite knowing that it's wrong for some form thrill/excitement/adrenaline rush or whatever; But now I think it's the ability to be manipulated into doing what's wrong. The form of government you have is irrelevant as long as you have the smart people around to manipulate the masses. The founders of the united states that they discovered a manner in which solve this dilemma, And it worked for a while because the original inhabitants of the united states were the strongest to reject; But now the United States has been flooded with people who have lived under Some very strong tyrannical governments.

[@dragonbricks7086]

The darn Skynet / The Matrix is already here. What to do?

[@jamesdellaneve9005]

Google is a crap search engine. It’ll be replaced by AI

[@larmondoflairallen4705]

Who do you think is behind AI? Next time you are on any large language model AI tool (like ChatGPT) ask it if men can get pregnant. They all give the same "Well, you see, it's complicated..." answer.

[@jamesdellaneve9005]

@@larmondoflairallen4705 AI is like garbage in and garbage out. Right now, AI is learning a lot of bad stuff from the web. It only takes one brand to break the mold. Just like Elon with Twitter.

[@gregcollins3404]

Here is the Bible prophecy on how this corruption is resolved: Then a mighty angel took up a stone like a great millstone and threw it into the sea, saying, “Thus with violence the great city Babylon shall be thrown down, and shall not be found anymore. "The sound of harpists, musicians, flutists, and trumpeters shall not be heard in you anymore. No craftsman of any craft shall be found in you anymore, and the sound of a millstone shall not be heard in you anymore. “The light of a lamp shall not shine in you anymore, and the voice of bridegroom and bride shall not be heard in you anymore. For your merchants were the great men of the earth, for by your sorcery all the nations were deceived. “And in her was found the blood of prophets and saints, and of all who were slain on the earth.” After these things I heard a loud voice of a great multitude in heaven, saying, “Alleluia! Salvation and glory and honor and power belong to the Lord our God! “For true and righteous are His judgments, because He has judged the great harlot who corrupted the earth with her fornication; and He has avenged on her the blood of His servants shed by her.” Again they said, “Alleluia! Her smoke rises up forever and ever!”... Rev 18,19

[@aaroncanfield76]

awareness of Googles bias doesn't protect you from the bias but in fact makes you more vulnerable...... unbelievable

[@bonniemiller5896]

I miss the days when Google was new. You would receive 3,424,218 results and you could actually take days to peruse all those results. Until recently you would still see posted the total number of hits but were throttled to only about 7 pages of results. Part of that logic is horsepower and bandwidth. I get that. But it just makes you wonder how the algorithm is selecting which results to post. Like you, Mr. Knowles, I am very grateful to have some old and some ancient resource material from which to choose when a question comes up. Personally, I don't trust any documentation published after the 1960s. :)

[@Guokas0422]

The Irony: Making the evidence go away is exactly what Google does 🤣🤣

[@HoustonRacewayKid]

Wikipedia is not a credible source of information. There is bias in everything. -Sensei

[@Mustapha1963]

Bernard Goldberg, the author of the seminal work on this subject "Bias", said that media displays its ideological bias in two ways. It can cover a story from a particular ideological viewpoint, which he referred to as "bias of commission". This is the far more prevalent variety. But they can also display their bias in determining which stories get covered and which do not, which he refers to as "bias of omission". To me, "bias of omission" is far more insidious. If they report on a story, you can read the report and determine for yourself whether or not bias appears and to what extent. But if they refuse to cover a story entirely, you have no way of judging their fairness. Thankfully, this has become somewhat less of a problem because the Progressive media no longer has a monopoly on reporting. There are far more outlets for news available today, and some of them try to be as bias-free as humans can possibly be.

[@michaelzell5905]

"NBC News-Brought to you by Pfizer!"

[@sadface7457]

Nobody is surprised they have liberal bais but people should surprised that the bais prevents them from serving the interests of the public, which public funding mandates them to do.

[@edwardimhoff3106]

I knew the Bias was there when I put a web address into the search engine and Google would not take me there. but instead presented 1000 different options. none of which were the Web site I had typed in. That is when Google began to suck.

[@drgdieselfrenzy7707]

I can't see the bias in Google. What I can see is that Google no longer gives me the data that I'm looking for.

[@thehunzz]

Google likes to send emails from my church into the Promotions folder.

[@bill3641]

As a Republican , I periodically tune into NPR to make sure that I'm on the correct course based on their opinions of "My Kind of Voter" The more they rant/posture, the better I feel.........

[@capnron65]

God bless you Dr. Epstein for your integrity and courage in speaking out about these issues.

[@rider65]

He is another statist

[@capnron65]

@@rider65 He's definitely an old-school liberal, but at least he has the integrity and courage to call out the this corruption and election interference, and for that I have respect.

[@timd5343]

have not trusted npr for a long time time to look at the money trail

[@stubby1122]

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." William Casey CIA Director (1981)

[@matt2817]

I can't wait til Elon Musk creates a better search engine

[@CharlieTWilbury]

😂 if it’s anything like the better Twitter, I’ll pass. Changing the direction of your censorship is not the same thing as not censoring.

[@blakej6416]

I don't see where this guy is coming from in terms of people understanding bias and that leading to them being more biased.

[@DreadedOne509]

Still amazed that people still use Google at all, for anything. Google is an echo chamber of liberal talking points and goals.

[@Maintain_Decorum]

How can you miss the bias in search results??!! It’s loud and clear. And manipulative.

[@ajstclair]

side note; whoever thought it was a good directorial idea to have the blank grey screens running in the BG, annoying.

[@Jito463]

This guy was on Crowder a while back, and he came off as more than a bit unhinged. It doesn't mean he's wrong, but he's overly hyper-focused on what he wants to prove. Gerald a couple times brought up the Pennsylvania supreme court changing the voting rules, and he kept yelling at them how it didn't matter and they were missing the point. He may be doing some good work, but take whatever he says with a grain of salt. As he said himself, he is not a conservative, and by extension he is not on the side of conservatism.

[@user-lu7dg5ny1r]

Which guy?

[@Jito463]

@@user-lu7dg5ny1r The guy in the video.....

[@johnphillips1858]

Google is also forcing me to celebrate holidays I don't want on my calendar. I only use it because I'm not really good at big tech schemes to monopolize the algorythems to change my sources of info.

[@gj1695]

Michael's cartoon avatar is the best one. Ben's looks nothing like him. And Matt's needs flannel -- and a scour.

[@MrDavidknigge]

It may not be possible to know how badly we are being mislead. The whole world lies in the hand of the wicked one. How long, Jehovah? How long must we wait for you to intervene?

[@bpalpha]

Thank you. NPR's pro-Israel bias has been sickening lately.

[@nosac1230]

It's hard to place enough importance on this research. Its frightening to think about how malleable our opinions are and how easily we can be swayed, EVEN when we are on the lookout for bias.

[@jharchery4117]

Thank goodness NPR is irrelevant,

[@josephboyce4522]

This is why people have to keep calling this stuff out, like the bias in Google's reminder to vote. People like Knowles and Russell Brand put spotlights on the massive bias in not just news media, but ALL media.

[@okboomer1340]

I like NPR's cool bed music....but that's where it ends.

[@crapphone7744]

There is ALWAYS a ghost in the shell.

[@Heathcliffe57]

Stopped listening to NPR over 15 years ago. The suffocating redundancies and tired tropes became unbearable. Plato's cave was becoming just a little too stuffy for me!

[@nancybrouse5070]

Google used to be excellent at the start of Google. Now it is useless.

[@CliffordUrich]

I was homeless, got into drugs, went into prisons, then i got to know Jesus, He changed my life.. Now i make 22k weekly. have a home, a wife, a lovely daughter... A child of God. HALLELUJAH

[@marinaaryantifelisitasgulo1445]

How did you do it? Do explain please 😯 My family have been into series of sufferings lately

[@CliffordUrich]

It's Renee Marie Harrison doing, she's changed my life.

[@CliffordUrich]

After I raised up to 325k trading with her I bought a new House and a car here in the states 🇺🇸🇺🇸 also paid for my daughter's surgery (Joey). Glory to God.shalom.

[@HanibalW]

I do know Renee M. Harrison, I also have even become successful....

[@JulesAugustin_]

Absolutely! I've heard stories of people who started with little to no knowledge but made it out victoriously thanks to Renee Marie Harrison.

[@JerryBearry]

It's easier to fool someone than convince someone they've been lied to. - paraphrased from a well known person who I can't recall at the moment. Mark Twain?

[@MBKindell]

Just google it for crying out loud... Which is humorous. I did and it looks to be Mark Twain. It is easier to fool a person than to convince them that they've been fooled.

[@paulroberts7767]

“…some kind of ghostly entity”… Welcome to Nature. You’re late to the story.

[@cianmoriarty7345]

I much be a strange bird. I see the bias and rebel against it.

[@robertleechford4250]

Thank you for sharing.

[@donalddavis7423]

Think of how completely he had to have destroyed that interview for them to not just chop it up and still try to make a hit piece. Epic.

[@dogman15]

If only Robert Epstein had made his own personal video recording of that NPR interview.

[@FirstNameLastName-okayyoutube]

Better to go with what has the most reasoning and never believe something because you falsely conclude you needed to believe something.

[@Call_Me_Troy]

Google? 😂😂😂 DuckDuckGo

[@ozziecrosby2092]

They're the same

[@gadsdenconsulting7126]

​@@ozziecrosby2092 correct. I think Brave is a better option (or was).

[@Call_Me_Troy]

@@ozziecrosby2092 ~ What do you suggest?

[@friedrich_nietzsche.]

Brave search or SearX.

[@MassiveTrackHunter]

Since NPR refused to air this information, YOU ALL know what to do. Share it out to all your accounts.

[@jasonborne5724]

I wonder how much of our tax money was spent by NPR to do an interview that they never aired.

[@60-second-HACKS]

3:30 Knowles can't be THAT naive. As if it's about buying brands. 😂😂😂😂😂

[@ritablanchard8133]

Great interview/discussion. St Thomas aquinas was an important insertion. Always go with desertions

[@Paul-pj5qu]

Google has a conscious bias toward whatever seems to make them the most money.

[@brucebaker3523]

Anytime I use a search engine the bias is frustrating and the propaganda is overwhelming.

[@marionkeepper5972]

After watching this it makes me worry that even the most rational of us may be basing opinions on feelings. That's the only explanation I can imagine for being aware of search bias and moving TOWARDS the bias. At 65+ I try to bring my lived experience into the analysis but that too is limited cause I haven't experienced EVERYTHING. Hard choices

[@debbylou5729]

Have the group read the national Enquirer for a few weeks. The two ‘Search Engines’ are identical

[@jackreacher.]

2:04 ''...how could you....''; ...as a matter of course....

[@JkBee]

what a great interview

[@chev39rsh]

I find Google and AI dialog are like talking with a nonsense machine. It says both sides of something vaguely cloaked in intellectual double speak.

[@nickb8735]

Idk how long ago the first study was but you can see the bias all day long & fuck if it sways me towards what they are trying to push on me...the complete opposite.

[@stevebabiak6997]

For some reason I can’t fathom, people think Google is an internet search company when in reality it is a sophisticated advertising company. It may have been an internet search company when it was first founded, but money changed things.

[@AmericahasbecomeSouthPark]

Well I agree with you to some degree. What I think happened, however, is that they realized it was more advantageous to data mine people to use that information for political purposes.

[@stevebabiak6997]

@@AmericahasbecomeSouthPark - they do that as well. I still think most of their revenue is from ads that run on search results.

[@yoyomawh4091]

Truth through light 💡

[@ross7684]

I have a bias, it is against anything Google.

[@michaelplunkett8059]

Love the "original search engine - Summa Theologica". Great work Mike. Bill Buckley would commend.

[@dcwebb1]

Finally sunlight has hit NPR!

[@a.c.m.4548]

Crowder did this same interview several years ago. Sad to know that essentially nothing has changed since the research concluded.

[@dragunov815]

Oh.

[@jerrybrickley2115]

So, Google has a bias. What source, from any time period, has no bias? To make your own decision, you should include personal knowledge, suspicion, skepticism, individuals you trust, and a hundred other ingredients. After all that, do the best you can and be open to contrary information. That's what being a human being is.

[@cristianocapasso5870]

Wasn’t Google about the “Do not do evil”?

[@PiedFifer]

Hmm, to whom did Aquinas refer? You know, the father of science, logic, and objectivity?

[@AndyG73]

This is the BIG difference between the (good) 'old days' and the current era (mid 90s onwards) of society / culture / science / business / politics / media.

[@jameshibbard2963]

3:32 Chevys v Ford? Where's the Dodge? Trying to shift the bias?

[@johngjesdahl-xx2gb]

Skepticism tagged as negativity by the status quo (The Wizard) so no one " looks behind the curtain " ... Judy G. as Dorothy 1939.

[@marksutton5540]

Why am I not surprised. I hate that my cynical-self just might be correct.

[@steveyv963]

Those flashing TVs in the background are hard to see.