The Strange Mystery of Quantum Time

[@jolly1559]

quantum time is defined as the amount of time between me seeing and me clicking a new Godier video

[@Fermi_Consistency]

U mean Planck time? Xd

[@EvenTheDogAgrees]

​@@Fermi_Consistencyhahah, dang. I knew someone smarter than me was going to beat me to it! 😂

[@jonathanlucas3604]

@@Fermi_Consistency It takes me 5 pico-plancks to click on the video, I am weak but I am improving

[@indiomoustafa2047]

Okay then what is an amount of time?

[@johnoswald8272]

@@jonathanlucas3604would that be a trillionth of a tredecillionth of a second?😂😭

[@rhouser1280]

Man, thank you! These videos make my day/night. Usually takes me a few nights to rewatch & get it all but almost every video are things that run through my head in those few peaceful moments when I occasionally get to daydream!

[@TWDExplained]

There's a kid somewhere watching this video right now.....and a spark is forming in the back of their mind.....many years from now while giving their Nobel Prize speech.....they mention inspiration from JMG videos.

[@jonathanalpart7812]

I’d like to thank JMG videos for inspiring me to win the Nobel Prize. - Jonathan Alpart, Nobel Prize winner

[@deathbydeviceable]

Actually knowledge has limits and we've reached it

[@EstamosDe]

​@@deathbydeviceableyes, we know eveything about Earth, we already got mapped all the oceans floors to the milimeter We know everything about all the planets, asteroids, and we are totally sure even black holes spins in just one axis And we are sure dark matter is real, and dar energy too, we know everything Like the cure for cancer, or aids, or hunger, or aging You are right, after thinking some seconds about it, you are so damn right. We solved everything and we know everything!

[@TWDExplained]

@@deathbydeviceable said by people in the 1500's 1600's 1700's 1800's 1900's and now the 2000's

[@Trux2010]

We will be extinct in 20 years

[@thedotconnector_8836]

What an unexpected treat! So nice to see the JMG gang out in force as well. Amid all life's craziness this habitat we've made for ourselves is the ultimate chillaxment. ❤

[@Dragon_Lord_Placidusax_]

Hope you've been well Mr. JMG! Great video as always big thanks!

[@benisman]

Just in time for sleep. Thanks for all that you do, massively appreciated ❤

[@IlrysKadiatu]

One of these videos, JMG is going to take a breath in the middle of the last word. XP "... this amazing universe in which we liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii *breath* iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiive."

[@rohanmalik9194]

It's scary to think about the "end" of everything. From our current understanding, there will be a point where the entire universe is dark and full of black holes. Even those will eventually die out. I wonder what will happen after all that takes place. A new start? Eternal darkness? We have barely scratched the surface of our understanding of the universe. I hope I am around for some big breakthroughs.

[@gmunny46]

There is a very strong argument that "nothing" is still an array of quanta that can change - vacuum state fluctuations. On absolutely incomprehensible timescales that extend beyond every black hole evaporating, there will be some arrangement of states described by these quanta that, in a sense, form the spark to cohere into a universe. The Boltzmann brain is hard to statistically disprove as well. This same state of fluctuations could, as arbitrarily as making a new universe, could make a full brain, complete with thoughts. I am not an expert in this field, but I highly enjoy the concept that nothingness commands the existence of something by virtue of sheer 'patience' or rather chaos.

[@grindn10101]

That the question that's been in my mind since I learned it

[@mrradman2986]

At that point there is no time as nothing will be there to mark its passing.

[@BriarLeaf00]

It's probably darkness for a googlplex and then...darkness for another after that. Perhaps as entropy increases our very ideas of what the universe is will change as well.

[@grindn10101]

@BriarLeaf00 there will be no concept of time so it will be instantaneous

[@innocentbystander3317]

Time is an illusion? "Lunch time, doubly so." -Ford Prefect

[@hmichaelkraut7968]

Thanks!

[@animeandwieardness6132]

Oh, JMG. How I've longed for your soothing voice to educate me about this crazy universe in which we liiivvvveeeee ❤

[@gcoffey223]

Quantum Time? Don't know about quantum, but I always got time for your vids

[@LostLightAstrophotography7]

I am so happy for a new JMG video ❤

[@stricknine6130]

Thanks, John, for putting a nice end to an otherwise typical Monday. I need a time machine so I can skip Mondays. Thanks for the video.

[@flowerpt]

Cool, I was surprised by the size-invariant result! It makes total sense that if entanglement is instantaneous that understanding time relies on understanding entanglement and vice-versa.

[@AnniesDad]

Spooky action at a distance still remains my biggest “um what”

[@thompaine5942]

It can be explained using the Holographic Principle. Every particle in our observable universe is thought to be smeared, or more aptly, holographically encoded across the entire cosmic event horizon. So the cosmic event horizon is about 15BLY away and everything we see in feee space is actually encoded onto that surface. So imagine you have two electrons in an otherwise empty universe, both electrons would be smeared across that entire event horizon some 15BLY away in every direction. So, here is how it works. When you entangle a particle pair you turn one particle into two particles and because of conservation of angular momentum means that answers, on spin mean they will have opposite directions. But at first spin is in a superposition. Now when you prepare an entangled pair you haven’t constrained the spin degree of freedom yet. All you have done is constrain that whatever answer you get from measuring spin, the other observer will see the opposite. So basically a degree of freedom has been constrained when creating a particle pair, that you don’t know each spin yet, but they must be opposite. Now when you measure the spin of one particle and say you found it was soon Up, then you know automatically the other particle must be soon down when you collapse its wave function. Since every particle is smeared across the same distant cosmic event horizon, that means even distant locales are on the holographic so rage , literally right next to each other. So, when the particle’s spin is measured, an ER=EPR wormhole opens up and transmits that qubit through the wormhole so that distant pro writes become local. Since every particle is smeared across the same horizon that means when a wormhole opens up to share the information, even particles 13 billion light years distant are literally next to each other in the holographic horizon. This is why entangled information translates at the same speed no matter if your particle pair is a nanometer apart or 12BLY apart, the actual distance between every particle is virtually zero on a holographic horizon. This last part is somewhat speculative, and assumes ER=EPR is true which the table top wormhole experiment by Maria Spiropula seems to indicate ER=EPR, that entanglement equals wormholes. John Preskill and Lenny Susskind seems to think that experiment might have shown ER=EPR. Check out Quanta Magazine’s video on the table top wormhole.

[@Byronic19134]

@@thompaine5942UM WHAT? You could have just said an example is quantum entanglement.

[@Orkid_Orchid]

In which we liiiiiive

[@iLikeMyOwnPosts]

You gotta get this in as a first comment to get it to the top of the list, if there's already 9-10 comments ahead of you it's too hard to build the momentum. I know, cause I've got the top comment with this on a few. I am telling you this cause I hope you get one to the top, too. I used to use that same profile pic, so... obviously you and I are not that different lol. Good luck and see you at the top!

[@Ian_sothejokeworks]

In which we diiiiiiiiiiiiiiie.

[@avaruusmuukalainen]

Liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiive!

[@ditto_lifestyle]

i still dont get the joke or why he says it like that. Love the show, jmg, event horizon etc just dont get this one. Maybe its kinda like Anton petrovs "hi wonderful person"

[@Strideo1]

I always enjoy a regular in depth exploration into the interesting and unknown aspects of this amazing universe in which we liiiiiive.

[@mRibbons]

Love your work. I play all your videos multiple times.

[@adambrain8365]

This reminds me of something my forecasting professor said to me in college. Now granted, we are basically trying to predict things with mathematical graphs. He said something about the three dimensions, and I piped up, “don’t you mean four, time?” He said he thought time was a fractal at best. So then I got to thinking. A bunch of amoebas in a liquid no taller than them would only perceive two dimensions. Tilt the table, and the liquid starts flowing. The wood grain on the table may look and feel similar to the amoeba, but it would be unique. A person flips the table and these creatures suddenly get a crash course on a new dimension. Are we just on the table when it comes to time? I don’t have an answer, just tried to imagine how I could try to invalidate Joey’s argument.

[@thompaine5942]

Time can be thought of as a dimension but not an axis in space. Space has 3 axes with 6 degrees of freedom, X,Y,Z shift and rotate. There isn’t a time rotation. There is time shift but only in one direction and it’s not a spatial direction. I think time is different than space although they are connected. I think why we only see 3 dimensions is because we exist on a 2-D holographic surface at the cosmic event horizon. Two holographic dimensions can be encoded into appearing to have 3 dimensions in holographically encoded environment.

[@jayboy2kay7]

Just in time for bed in Scotland 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 love you JMG!!

[@Njw2319]

Same here brother glasgow ❤🙏

[@ili_711]

Always looking forward to your uploads!

[@i_accept_all_cookies]

So the big unfolding isn't a question of "how can something come from nothing?", but "how can the dynamic come from the static?"...

[@mnrvaprjct]

Or nothing is truly static, “static” is just some concept that emerges from our brains in the classical world - but the quantum world that under pins classical physics, dynamic processes are all that is and ever really was.

[@jamesculverhouse4657]

Im not sure if it was Mckenna or Watts but i love the quote "how could something come from nothing? Well where else would you expect something to happen?" Not exactly scientific but i love it all the same

[@Mystipaoniz]

@@jamesculverhouse4657 I came back from the nothingness. I don't know how it's possible, but it is. So i agree with this statement. ^^

[@quickiequackduckwash]

In a black hole, static lasts billions of years ( according to Hawking) gravity eventually wears down the state of singularity. When time and the fx of gravity go pass a certain point, equilibrium kicks in and the black hole erupts a new universe... I think that is how it is... please correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks in advance.

[@theostapel]

The Special Will - acts and brooks no contradiction. When - the Divine works - it is automatic. We share - in this Work and learn - to love - for - Love is the Base. (Hint from Raja yoga meditation) Fare thee well - in life's journey.

[@dubzchekum]

All of time led to me clicking this video…

[@harishthethird]

ALL of it!

[@EvenTheDogAgrees]

13.8 billion years of cosmic expansion, of which 3.7 billion years of evolution of life, all led to this one moment. And history will forget it. Kinda sad, isn't it?

[@waynegoddard4065]

​@@EvenTheDogAgreesI too agree

[@muttfist]

Very weird and true😮

[@marshallodom1388]

I bought a happy meal for myself and one for my friend. He ordered a hot dog and I ordered a hamburger. I dropped off his meal to him and went back to my work office to eat mine. When I opened my happy meal it contained a hot dog. I immediately knew his happy meal contained a hamburger, since the receipt showed I bought one of each kind. Yet by then we were nearly 3 miles apart. I suppose all happy meals are quantum entangled.

[@TheMacster555]

Find videos about hidden variables, the EPR paper and Bell’s inequality theorem

[@Kowbanator]

You can get hot dogs in a happy meal where you are?! Jealous

[@tdawg713]

Entropy- it’s not what it used to be.

[@brenton2561]

Schroedingers happy meal. Until you opened it, it was both a hotdog and a hamburger!

[@tr1p1ea]

.... Hotdog in a happy meal?

[@The1MkII]

I see you changed the channel name! I think naming the channel after you it's well deserved John, your voice, viewpoint, choice of guests, and perspective is what draws me to listen I appreciate the work you put into this content❤️

[@nploda1408]

Huh? He didn't change the name. It's been John Michael Godier since the beginning.

[@nploda1408]

Huh? He didn't change it. What do you mean?

[@CapinCooke]

I think the OP doesn’t realize that JMG has TWO different channels on KZbin. 1) JMG channel 2) Event Horizon channel

[@DarkShadowReign]

​@@CapinCooke 3) JMG Clips

[@Terminator-ht3sx]

@@DarkShadowReigndsp😂

[@OmegaVideoGameGod]

John I’ve been watching you for years, I’m shocked you still don’t have 1 million plus subs

[@DefaultUser61]

Please new compilation of science facts! Been a subscriber since you were at 20 k and you just keep getting better. You make the life better in which we liiiiive

[@CapinCooke]

Always a treat when a new JMG video drops. But this one… well THIS one is a double fudge chocolate ice cream cookie treat!!! The best brain twister video since JMG’s previous vid. Thanks JMG for all that you do here on KZbin. You are a cozy nighttime friend.

[@K3rty]

2:44 I always thought that instertellar wave planet experienced something like a positive feedback loop. Something gavitationally started the waves slowly and made them gradually that big by maintaining their momentum. Like circulating water in a glass by shaking it the right frequency.

[@CagedInSilence]

I had the same thought.

[@stuart9411]

Thank you for doing these videos. You open my mind into so much. 🎉😊

[@jesseadams8933]

I'll definitely be listening to this one every now and again--something about this one...

[@jonathanlucas3604]

I know the animations are just for show but at 7:03 I absolutely love how it feels while hearing about the nature of time and unified theories.

[@SlammedZero]

Loved this one. Time is my favorite cosmic mystery.

[@Ian_sothejokeworks]

God, 'quantum' is such a great word! Take the Bond movie title, 'Quantum of Solace'. That literally means, "The smallest amount of human comfort." What a great word!

[@SevenSixTwo2012]

Our known universe truly does feel like a giant prison simulation, where everything is coded in a way to prevent the "inmates" from finding an escape route.

[@danielbonzaibuckerooo]

That’s what religion says .. quantum physics and religion have odd similarities

[@deathbydeviceable]

Cause it's meant for one to see but all to feel 😂

[@2013Arcturus]

The Demiurge

[@MrEddieLomax]

Death is the only way out. I wonder how true that quote is, it came from mortal kombat 2, awful but fun film.

[@EvenTheDogAgrees]

To be fair, there is a way out. But it's a bit of a leap of faith...

[@jimwyatt9894]

It’s about time someone did this!

[@3D_TUTS]

This guy is amazing! Thanks for making these videos!

[@warpedbeyondhelp]

I admire your presentation and knowledge of the subject. Thank you very much for making these videos.

[@PsRohrbaugh]

What we perceive as random subatomic action is movement through additional dimensions. Same thing applies to dark energy.

[@mattmiller4917]

I guess it's a lot to ask from an 11 minute video, but I still haven't the slightest clue how entanglement could cause time to emerge.

[@MCsCreations]

Thanks, John! Today I was really needing it... It's a long story, but... I was told a judgment came out, I tried to contact my lawyer and looks like he passed. 😔 Too much things at the same time for me to process... Anyway, stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊

[@MrBell-ho8ts]

Awesome stuff boss

[@seanmorrissy7347]

Genuinely one of your best videos imo

[@unune9069]

I almost had a headache trying to keep up with everything in this video. I don't understand most of it even after watching it few times but its getting slightly better

[@darthjarwood7943]

So if distance matters not when particles are entangled could we encode information in particles like a language. .im not sure when he says when one changes state the other inatantly changes state like does that mean gas to solid or liquid? If we could incode a language into that couldnt that instant information transfer across space time?

[@bluex610]

It "changes" state when we "observe" it. For us to write a code would be "observing" it. That's why they say the cat is both alive and dead until we look in the box. We can't write a code unless we look in the box. I'm a dumb internet bro that smoked a bit too much weed. So I'm probably misinterpreting it, but just my thought. 😅

[@xanderunderwoods3363]

I had to listen to this video three times and I still am not sure I fully understand it but I'm trying, which is sad because I have a strong science and math background. It sounds incredibly fascinating, this could unlock a lot of things that we have been struggling to understand. Though I suppose the "Why" will always elude us.

[@saftheartist6137]

That’s a great idea, Time emerging from entangled activity.

[@jo_crespo11235]

Excellent video, keep the hard work going.

[@jamesculverhouse4657]

I love these videos so much and gives me a strange kind of hope when you explain about time dilation and i think of all the people saying "well yeah isnt that obvious?". I imagine the things we as a species will see as "obvious" in the future. ❤

[@Dth091]

One of my favourite ideas is that we do not measure changes of state through time, but instead we measure time through changes of state. This in of a sense, to me at least, implies that what we call "time" as a coordinate is not fundamental.

[@TerribleShmeltingAccident]

we see the oddity of time in the double slit (specifically the way single particles will form an interference pattern if enough are fired at the setup over time.) As particles do not posses the capability to think, remember, or predict. IMO they land where they land because they already have. Much like how we watch movies in frames per second....this doesnt change the fact that the whole movie has already been created regardless of how much weve watched thus far.

[@jwr2904]

Your username is hilarious, I get the reference lol

[@cykkm]

Hi John, 0:44, “ticks changing with _acceleration”,_ followed by “if you're in a starship travelling with a great _velocity,_ time dilates relative to surroundings” reminded me of the Bell's Starship Paradox. Look it up, very interesting stuff! It's resolvable in SR, although I'd prefer GR any time-SR handles acceleration rather unintuitively. Could you please share some pointers to the paper? Seems very interesting! I'll also e-mail you a pointer to a lecture by Susskind tonight, where he speaks of entanglement holding the quantum vacuum together, as if "stitching" it, and an ensuing black hole paradox: what would happen if you fully entangle two black holes, which is solidly possible in a _gedankenexperiment._ The resolution of the paradox is fascinating, their insides are possible to treat as identical, like two event horizons with a single inside, or at least indeterminate. There are also ER bridges in this talk. You'll surely make at least two scripts out of it! 🙂

[@JohnMichaelGodier]

Oopsie on the paper link, I amended it to the description but here it is: journals.aps.org/pra/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevA.109.052212 I remember the Bell's Starship idea. That was the one where you had two starships connected with a thread and intuitively the thread should not break when undergoing Lorentz Contraction, but it actually will break because the spacetime in between the ships is not contracting as I recall. I've never looked this up but I think there is a loophole, the Alcubierre warp field. Two connected ships like that inside the bubble in principle makes it seem like the thread would not break under those conditions. Send it over, my wandering interest level is currently on physics.

[@evilpandakillabzonattkoccu4879]

An idea that I think about a lot but don't hear others mention is in regards to backwards time travel: If you travel backwards in time, one of two things will happen....you either traveled forward in time from your perspective but backwards in time from the perspective of your starting point... .....or, you'd go literally backwards in time, meaning back to a state of being that already occurred. In that case, you'd lose any information gained going through time normally and would repeat the same things...make the same choices. Nobody seems to mention the last type of time travel.

[@k1m6a11]

That second type of time travel would be indistinguishable from not going back in time at all. It would also resolve time travel paradoxes. It's simultaneously a very interesting and boring idea.

[@Sevenigma777]

John could talk for hours about how grass grows and I would be totally captivated lol

[@prototropo]

At 4:05, a syntactical quirk in the matrix allows for two meanings, with only one intended. "One of four dimensions" wasn't supposed to mean "only one of four" possible dimensions, right? Rather we have "one universe possessed of four" distinct dimensions. BTW--I'm grateful for this time together . . . it's a great channel with which to be entangled.

[@devin4066]

Great video, Mike.

[@luminousfractal420]

cant keep entangled particles going long due to the universal tick rate. get refreshed due to the diffuse and temporary nature of the fractal noise. 😄 wonder if we shot them one after the other and one past the other and had one affect the next before it flaked out and the force they were carrying was gravitational could we propel ourselves using gravity? like a ladder pulling on one rung after the next.

[@t.j.payeur5331]

Thanks, dude, this was great. I'm gonna have to watch it again. I'm a big fan of loop quantum gravity. Would you be inclined to apply your perspiscacity to that particular subject in a future video? I'd like to hear your thoughts on the matter, thanks...

[@matthewdavies2057]

That was a fun one. Thanks!

[@soundtrancecloud5101]

Could you please explain to me why this would not work? Initial Setup: Both sender and receiver know the initial states of 1000 pairs of entangled particles. Each pair starts in a well-defined entangled state. Message Encoding: The sender disrupts the entanglement of certain pairs to encode a binary message. For instance, a '0' is encoded by disrupting the entanglement, and a '1' is left as is. Message Decoding: The receiver measures the particles and compares the results to the expected initial states. If a pair shows a disrupted entanglement (unexpected state), it decodes as '0'. If the entanglement is intact (expected state), it decodes as '1'. Isolation: Each particle is held in a dedicated special box. The box ensures that each of the particles is kept at very low temperatures to minimize thermal noise. The box maintains a vacuum environment to prevent particle interactions with air molecules. Materials like gold, silver, platinum, and lead are used to shield the particles from external electromagnetic interference and radiation. Detection: Each box state as a whole is measured at set intervals.The sender ensures the disruption is severe enough to be easily detected. Why not: Yes, this approach challenges traditional interpretations, can only send the msg once, but it seems to be within the realm of theoretical and experimental inquiry.

[@user-oo6ty1yq2l]

Still the best channel on the web.

[@Swobbers]

We’re sleeping good with this one 🔥🔥🗣️🗣️🎙️

[@straagzthemc4614]

My dad once told me about an assignment he was given where he had to give a speech on "anything, something, and nothing". I should ask him if he has that high school speech because 20 years later, none of my assignments were that thought provoking.

[@JK-kh1rj]

John when will you post your intergalactic chili recipe?

[@JohnMichaelGodier]

I don't have an intergalactic one, or at least its not yet intergalactic, but I do have a solid chili recipe. Old one from Texas, pre-1930.

[@Law0086]

The thing is, time is different depending on where you are in the universe. And a light YEAR is just a measurement WE have created to help us understand the universe. Love this channel. Keep up the good research.

[@douglasdarling7606]

I can't help but think of time is an emergent property of energy which in all its forms is motion

[@guillaumemaurice3503]

Thank you for sharing this video it was very interesting and fascinating. ❤

[@Life_Is_Torture0000]

It couldn't possibly be any more entangled than the computer cords in my office.

[@STONECOLDET944]

An arrow pointing in one direction can be made out of many smaller ones pointing in different directions. Spacetime can be both continuos and discontinuous being quantised, a wave intersecting a 2D plane is comtinuos in 3D, but discontinuous in 2D, its all a matter of perspective

[@KenMac-ui2vb]

Once I learned of the Zeno Effect, my entire mindset changed. Time can be stopped. Mind, blown.

[@GizzyDillespee]

Trippy video and deep audio topic.

[@CRAYONR4GE]

Man, we think we are so smart. But we still have so much to learn. Great video!

[@islandtech1963]

This is my third listen to this one and I'm still unwrapping political in my head. I love the awe inspiring, mind blowing content!

[@jimanders6750]

Hey john, if you could drag uranus, neptune and saturn into jupiter could you create a sun?

[@JohnMichaelGodier]

Still not enough mass to start fusion. You'd get a super Jupiter basically. What you could do is start dividing the sun up, there you could get at least ten red dwarfs out of a single G type star like the sun.

[@El-Bandito]

Another amazing video!

[@NeovanGoth]

1:47 Kip Thorne actually was executive producer of Interstellar and even wrote a book called The Science of Interstellar. The movie did take some artistic freedom though. The rendering of Gargantua for example was based on an actual simulation, but intentionally left some of the optical effects out.

[@RosutoUtsuro]

One thing I don't understand is why we think that a warp drive, at least as far as I understand them, would send someone back in time. My understanding is that your ship is still, in a moving pocket of space. Do we know for sure that space moving that way interacts with time at all? Space is expanding away from us, and at a certain distance it would seem it's traveling away from us faster than light. Is that space going backwards in time?

[@beautimous7347]

Space doesn't have these same effects because space is not a physical object. Any physical object within this warp bubble would still experience the same effect as being in a time machine. Space "traveling" at FTL isn't going to break causality. A physical object within a warp bubble traveling FTL would. Edit: the only thing the warp bubble doesn't break is relativity. A warp bubble with a physical object traveling either at light speed or sublight speeds no longer has a causal relationship broken. So we can, in theory, use an alcubeirre drive to travel at relativistic speed without having the same issues.

[@dreamluchadore]

I was always told that time is a piece of wax falling on a termite, choking on the splinters.

[@JohnMichaelGodier]

In the time of chimpanzees, I was a monkey ....

[@RichMitch]

Will neutrons decay?

[@MADSK_LLZ]

Yes. In about 10 minutes.

[@j_117]

Yes

[@seriousmaran9414]

Free neutrons do decay. Ones with protons seem stable.

[@booombasa]

Schrodinger neutrons as today

[@Vile_Entity_3545]

Nobody will ever know. They say you can’t destroy matter, so whatever is the lowest form will probably be forever.

[@JUST1N888]

Time is a measurement of movement. If everything paused time will stop 🛑 Just like you can’t stop quantum tunneling you can’t pause the universe. Great video

[@TheStanismyname]

Great video as always, but a question popped up when you spoke of quantum entanglement. Could quantum entanglement be used to measure the actual size of the universe?

[@davidbailey453]

loved that. It sounds like a plausible reason for existence of time

[@oblonghas]

I like your voice. And this was a cool watch. Time has always fascinated me and our lack of understanding makes it so much more amazing. I’m no physicist, but for a good while I’ve felt that time and gravity are definitely connected. Anyhow, Glory to God for all things.

[@starsreflectingsky]

Interesting stuff. The hypothesis of a black hole being a singularity that is not in a location but rather in a place in the future because of the way it warps time and space... This is interesting to me because I imagine that when something goes to the event horizon that it's not falling to a place in our current time but rather the object is disappearing from our view because it's going to a place in the future which also is not available for us to view. Just that notion that these items are still in the same spot in space so to speak but they've just shifted Forward in time is almost breathtaking And that could almost mean that they don't actually get destroyed or anything but they're all just in the future somewhere perfectly intact? Similar to this way of thinking about how an object that is shifted in time will disappear from our view.... If there are things in the universe that are moving faster than the speed of light and that causes some kind of time shift issue then that's why we can't see it I imagine. If we only get to view a certain slice of time and this stuff is essentially moving through time then we would only get to see a slice of it which would probably be very rare. Like if you were looking at a star and something was coming from that star to your face but whatever that particle is was moving faster than the speed of light... What would you see? I don't think you would see anything because again if it's moving through time differently then it's not even in your frame of time reference anymore. Or it might have been for a brief moment. There's something like this could be true then I don't know how we could really detect stuff other than know that we're seeing effects but we just can't see it. We can't see stuff that's all shifted around in time. But a particle that's moving faster than the speed of light that does somehow perhaps travel backwards in our time reference would be traveling against the expansion of the universe going back to its smaller origins. It's almost like something that's traveling faster than the speed of light would essentially be headed back to the beginning of the universe. How it would travel across retracting space and all that I don't.... Again it's really awesome to think about but I've never really heard anybody refer to these topics the way I'm sharing here Maybe cuz it's blatantly stupid and completely impossible and not with even an inch of how the math probably works but I really wish I could ask an expert and just get their opinion.

[@Jaybearno]

I can't get over the emotional/philosophical impact the idea of how energy expended by an observer "buys" you time relative to others. I think it means more than we give it credit for. It's a universal biological fact that the ability to move through space at discretion is an evolutionary benefit. So the natural extension of that is the urge to move at greater speeds, which in essence gives the observer control over time itself.

[@hakanlundberg]

The Nobel Prize to the guy who can figure this out how we can snooze, not only the alarm clock, but time itself a few minutes every morning!

[@ozAqVvhhNue]

1:04 Small correction: You also get this effect near a gravitational source, because gravity also represents an acceleration, one away from the center of the gravitational source (because you stay at a constant distance from it).

[@disideratum]

Next time please throw Retrocausality into the mix😁 Also, what about intuition, déjà vu, premonition, etc? That is meaningful information unbound by the arrow of Time. (Ok, it's metaphysical but it's still testable right?)

[@nicholasrckent8609]

Thank you John.

[@odysseyorchids9507]

Now I can sleep ty jmg you are the man

[@nicholassternon5857]

JMG there exists a certain chemical with a 3 letter acronym that will absolutely affect the passage of time for you. You don’t need a black hole to experience some extreme time dilation

[@irishsoxfan34]

This is sorta off topic but it was brought up in the video and I wanted to convey my thoughts on the subject. Now I've played in my head over the years what quantum entanglement is and how it could be useful to us. Now I barely understand what it is so I think more on its practical use than it's overall mechanics of it. I do 100% believe that information cannot be passed along two quantum particles and using it as a way of communication that way is impossible. However in the Game Mass effect specifically in the sequel one of the game's antagonists, a corporation develops a quantum entanglement communication device. Back then it was already known this was impossible, but they put it in the game without much in the way of explanation. That got me thinking, "what if we stumbled upon an advanced civilization that had such a technology, "how did they figure out a workaround?" plauged my thoughts. Through that question alone I think I figured out a way, but let me preface here that I'm just a lowly dolt with an interest in the cosmos and I could be misconstruing my feeble understanding. Again I do believe that communication between a pair of entangled particles is impossible. However there could be a workaround of sorts. Now my feeble understanding of quantum entanglement is that whenever you change the spin direct of one particle end the other particle follows suit. This alone cannot convey information but say you made two boxes and made a billion quantum entangled particles and placed one set in one box and their entangled partners in the other box. Then you set these particles up into rows and set a value that left spin equals "0" and right spin equals "1". Well, my friends is binary code and the very thing all computers (which is our primary device of communication) need to function properly. All you'd have to do is change the spin of a few particles to get a binary sequence and a computer to interpret that on both sides of the paired boxes. Now again I don't claim I have extra knowledge and I could be dead wrong about my assumptions and I'm probably not the first to think of this idea. But I've never seen such arguments and I wanted to share them regardless and to maybe spark debate on this topic since it was brought up by John.

[@Martianj88]

Love your videos sir ❤😎

[@CagedInSilence]

04:30 - I am just some guy, but I often wonder if quasiparticles could unlock the mysteries as to why time only seems to move in one direction as quasiparticles only have mass when moving in one direction. Maybe we only have mass when moving a particular direction in time.

[@zack7993]

This might be vain and I may be misunderstanding, but doesn't quantum entanglement just refer to the spin of subatomic particles depending on the spin of their partner particles? The way I've heard it described by my profs is simply that when one particle's spin is measured, the spin of the other is known by virtue of them being dependent on one another. As far as I know information can't be exchanged from particle to particle via entanglement

[@thebaccathatchews]

"Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so." -- Douglas Adams

[@likecrazyhorse]

Particles that are entangled changing state at the same time would mean that some form of information can travel faster than light. It might not even be the standard definition of "information", but imagine some way of building a communication system using that.

[@exjwsouthernbelle4543]

I love your videos but I wish the music was a tad quieter, so I could focus more on your voice

[@TedToal_TedToal]

It's always said that the passage of time changes depending on things like acceleration. But you admitted yourself that for the person experiencing the time, it doesn't change. So I would argue that actually the passage of time is not changing at all. Instead, some kind of a relationship between the time of different frames of reference is what's changing.

[@DavidEvans_dle]

Hey John if the early universe wasn't entangled - maybe it might revert to that state again. Just another thing to place on my list of JMG video existential threats.