Simon discusses the Swordfish and Finned Swordfish Sudoku pattern and explains how, with the help of Hodoku software, they could help solve last Friday's Diabolical Sudoku from The Daily Telegraph.
Пікірлер: 68
@robertborcherding90854 жыл бұрын
I understand the logic as you are explaining it; however, applying that logic in real situations, or even recognizing a situation is quite a different story.
@eugenetswong4 ай бұрын
I agree that it is easier to understand than find, but today I discovered what it takes. Every chain or structure can join to another chain or structure. In many cases, like the fin, it just adds to the complexity, but if we just focus on the cells that the structures see, then it makes sense.
@user-zf9gg7do3c4 жыл бұрын
Wow... You are the first person that explained this so that I could fully grasp the concept. Thank you so much. I have been able to solve these tough puzzles consistently now. You have earned a new subscriber today!
@GJvv20094 жыл бұрын
Took me several times listening to understand. Thank you. Well done.
@KoyasuNoBara3 жыл бұрын
Thank you, I found another video where you mentioned swordfish, and since I was unfamiliar with the technique, I was having trouble following the logic. Hopefully I can understand that other video now!
@marykosanke54314 жыл бұрын
Great explanation. I understand the logic, but I have never found one! I will have to see if my app allows me to hi-lite the numbers like that. I don't think I would ever notice a finned swordfish, although I understood you explanation.
@n8likesmath4 жыл бұрын
Sweet explanation, I think the people bashing in the comments below don't understand swordfish of x wings in the first place. Thankfully I've spent enough time on your videos to understand normal swordfish, and this was an excellent explanation of the finned version. Thank you
@darcash17382 ай бұрын
I mean sure it makes sense, but what’s the actual approach for these? I don’t want to have to try it for each number, so is there a way to get a feel for which number I should be trying to look for a swordfish for? If not, there’s got to be a quick way to consistently process through a swordfish I notice that 3 candidate rows must match each other perfectly in columns to work, and 3s (as I will now call them) must match to both candidate columns of 2s. From there if you do it systematically, you can either eliminate all possible swordfishes with 3s or come across a valid one. Then you are left with just the 2s, of which you must have at least one alignment for different 2s to be compatible-and of course if two alignments then that is simply and X wing. This systematic approach sounds like it would be efficient even though I haven’t put it into practice yet. But this wouldn’t work exactly with doing the fin. Then it seems like you need to make an allowance for 4 columns which would sort of mess up that system. How would you integrate the fin into this system, or do you have a more effective way of doing it? Because in this case he actually had two 2s, and a 3 that was singly matched with both of these 2s. Is this a common way that finned ones come up? Are there other common ways that fins show up?
@n8likesmath2 ай бұрын
@@darcash1738 look for numbers that are more restricted abd have columns of rows of 2-3
@Proflaxis2 күн бұрын
Wow, this looks like something I can use in my solves. However, I am generally solving NYT hard sudokus and the tools are a bit clumsy to use and there's no color that's available so kinda hard to detect. But I am gonna try. Thank you!!
@LearnSciSnippets4 жыл бұрын
Best description and finally understand now. Thanks
@PhilBoswell3 жыл бұрын
Throwback to when 17 minutes was a long video 🤯
@thomaskivi5 жыл бұрын
I would rather use empty rectangle here in an actual solve, also on the same 7’s: if r4c4 is a 7, then r6c6 cannot be a 7. But if the 7 in that box is not in r4c4, it is either of the positions along c6 in that box. That starts a chain along the 7’s, which ends in box 4, causing r6c2 to be a 7, meaning that again r6c6 has to be a 1. Thanks for explaining the finned swordfish fundamentally! It’s not really much more complicated than a finned x-wing in the end. Just harder to spot.
@MohamedMahmoud-ey9tj6 ай бұрын
I have been using this idea without even knowing it has a name
@ianwebster9955 жыл бұрын
Interesting stuff. Very clear and helpful. Hope there’s no weever fish.
@monoelmono94765 жыл бұрын
Nice explanation. My worst nightmare are the swordfishes. I am just hopeless at spotting them
@monoelmono94765 жыл бұрын
@Sam De Roeck I find XY chains pretty easy! I love chains. Swordfishes, Jellyfishes and finned varieties of them will stump me!!
@alsecen56743 ай бұрын
It would be helpful if your examples were more realistic. The x wing example - Do they all have to be identical pairs? Can they have more than two numbers in each cell? Can I eliminate numbers in the row/column?
@user-gn5fq1zu9f5 жыл бұрын
Deep deep deep! Thanks for great video.
@johndoe-ow2ns Жыл бұрын
This was excellent. Thanks 👍
@TrinityEcho4 жыл бұрын
KZbin algorithm is fascinating. It showed me this video today. Was able to use what I learned in a NYT puzzle several hours later...
@The_Cali_Dude_885 жыл бұрын
I learned a lot of 'techniques' with some other 'soduko' learning guides which are and still is helpful... however I like your approach as pro-solvers as a bases of time and discovery of these 'methodologies' that can be utilized on the hardest puzzles at the higjest degree so I watch and attempt your styles to get better.. and faster... I make mistakes but learn each time... the NY hard is one you steered me towards... like that with one exception... don't close out the tab... 😁
@ericwallhagen31465 жыл бұрын
Don't you also have a finned swordfish in Rows 2, 6, and 7, with the "fin" being r6c2? Following this would also force R6C6 into a 1. This was the one I spotted, to the same conclusion.
@wossaaaat5 жыл бұрын
I suck with this kind of logic, but I thiiiiink that arrangement would eliminate the 7 from R4C3 (which in turn would eliminate it from R6C6, but through pointing rather than the wing). Not sure if that's what you meant anyway, but just in case, I don't think the fin on R6C2 would eliminate the 7 from R6C6 as part of the actual swordfish logic in itself, because either R6C2 is the 7 and R6C6 is eliminated, or it's not the 7 and you have the swordfish, but R6C6 is now a part of that swordfish and _can't_ be eliminated.
@andres3725 Жыл бұрын
Great stuff 🤙💯
@nihatbekiroglu80045 жыл бұрын
I don't understand how the pattern of 4s at 7:36 is a valid swordfish ; if the 4 in R2C4 turns out to be the real one, it eliminates the 4s in R2C7 and R8C4, but then what if 4 goes into R5C6 ? It eliminates the 4s in R8C6 and R5C7, and so at the end the two 4s in C7 are gone...Where do you place 4 in C7 ? Can you please clarify this ?
@Gsudi5 жыл бұрын
The 4 in R8C4 would be still available. You must not put both a 4 in R2C4 and R5C6. With this pattern you can eliminate all the other 4s in C4, C6 and C7, which aren't in the example. So if you can put a 4 in only those 6 positions you will have a useless swordfish, like the useless X-Wings later in the video. That's what I understood.
@vernonharmon40073 жыл бұрын
A swordfish does two things: first it allows you to eliminate possibilities in the opposite direction it was created (if it's a swordfish in columns, you eliminate in the rows, or if it's in rows, you eliminate in columns), but because of sudoku it also means that if you solve any of the positions for the number in the swordfish, you can immediately eliminate at least 2 other candidates -- along the row and column -- which will result in either an x-wing or a solvable angle configuration like the r8c6/r5c6/r5c7 arrangement you're talking about. In that configuration, r5c6 CANNOT contain the 4, because as you noted it eliminates all valid possibilities. This is why sparser swordfish are more powerful.
@TheDmntdmnky5 жыл бұрын
I'm still hella confused 😅
@jimbak4784 жыл бұрын
What is the app that you use for this puzzle? I can’t find one that shows candidates
@fernandomaano27034 жыл бұрын
beyond the league of my understanding
@chloemaxwell26283 жыл бұрын
There is a swordfish with 3's as well
@djgulston3 жыл бұрын
10:55 Didn't you miss a swordfish for the 3's? Look at rows 1, 4 and 6. Or does the extra 3 in row 4 on the far right disqualify it from being a swordfish?
@slashclaw143 жыл бұрын
That’s not a swordfish because yep the 3 candidate in r4c8 is not confined within c2, c3, and c4 like the other cells. If 3 wasn’t a candidate in that cell, then there would be one
@djgulston3 жыл бұрын
@@slashclaw14 Ah, alright! Perfect! Thank you! I've been trying to wrap my head around this. I just discovered swordfish today from his recent video.
@kevinruggles2064 жыл бұрын
I am unclear as to how you use the knowledge that the cell you identified (6,6) is affected with either 7 or no 7 in the other cell(4,4) because it would be different numbers (in 6,6) so different logic would follow. I very much enjoy these videos where you explain techniques without solving an entire puzzle. Could you put together a play list of such videos? Previously I have seen a list of all the logic types around 8 techniques I think. It would be fantastic if you could do a video on them. It did not include swordfish or variants or jellyfish or worms. The 2 latter are other techniques I would like to see demonstrated.
@wokkawicca4 жыл бұрын
You're unclear on why 6,6 cannot contain a 7? Obviously if 4,4 *is* 7, 6,6 is ruled out by sharing the same box. If 4,4 is *not* 7, then there is a valid swordfish in rows 2/4/7. It's an incomplete 222 fish instead of the full 333 type which would also include 2,6; 4,8; and 7,3, but the logic still holds: no other 7 candidates allowed in columns 3, 6, or 8 apart from those rows. This applies to 6,6 once again, so either way, 6,6 cannot be 7, and you can eliminate it as a candidate in that cell. (apologies if you were asking a different question and I'm simply restating the points from the video) Beyond that, you simply have to move on with whatever advantage that gains you. I am realizing there are many 'trivial' examples of these patterns where it's pointless to find them because they don't eliminate anything. For instance, there is a second finned swordfish on 7s in rows 2,6, and 7, using the same columns, with 6,2 as the 'fin'. It isn't at all useful, because there are no other 7 candidates to eliminate in box 4 where the fin is found. (The finned fish only operates on cells both the fin and the possible fish can 'see'--ie, in the same box as the fin. It doesn't affect, say, 1,2.)
@billdwyer41295 жыл бұрын
Great. Thanks.
@h0ctApmoingay Жыл бұрын
Can someone pls explain how when there's no 7 in R4C4, then the 7 in R6C6 is eliminated please. Thank you.
@Has39.bfpo43 Жыл бұрын
I think he is saying that if there was no 7 in R4C4 then the it would be a ‘normal’ swordfish and all the green 7’s in C3, C6 & C8 would be eliminated.
@h0ctApmoingay Жыл бұрын
thank you for your reply@@Has39.bfpo43 , now I'm gonna try and make sense of it and watch this video again, haha, I'm just so slow at this
@djgulston3 жыл бұрын
11:44 Could rows 1, 4 and 6 also equate to a finned swordfish?
@mrsulaman99012 жыл бұрын
Ding, ding, ding, you are absolutely correct sir. Well done.
@groslou99972 жыл бұрын
Much easier to see
@imransaifi23995 жыл бұрын
If you eliminate 7 from R4C4 somehow, there will be naked single 7 left in R8C4 which dismantle the swordfish pattern. Please clarify
@CrackingTheCryptic5 жыл бұрын
The key is that eliminating the 7 from r4c4 is actually not straightforward at all. The beauty of the Finned Swordfish technique is that we're able to say "whether or not there is a 7 is r4c4, I don't care - because I know that, either way, I can logically eliminate the possibility of a 7 in r6c6".
@imransaifi23995 жыл бұрын
Thanks for reply
@roccoxxxx14 жыл бұрын
I think the unfinned fish are more rare, but at the same time recognizing that there is actually finned fish is really hard
@eliseocid74575 жыл бұрын
👏👏👏👏
@altcommand3 жыл бұрын
I am no better at spotting these.
@The_Cali_Dude_885 жыл бұрын
where can you get the same software?
@CrackingTheCryptic5 жыл бұрын
Just look up 'Hodoku'
@The_Cali_Dude_885 жыл бұрын
thx!
@The_Cali_Dude_885 жыл бұрын
well next to be safe I see and realize your using but when the site says 'not secure' I get iffy... are you comfortable with the suggestion with a cautionary yes?
@CrackingTheCryptic5 жыл бұрын
This is where I downloaded Hodoku from... I'm not IT-competent enough to guarantee the software but it hasn't broken my computer yet :) hodoku.sourceforge.net/en/index.php
@richardcranium05 жыл бұрын
@@The_Cali_Dude_88 Here's the link to the SSL-encrypted site: sourceforge.net/projects/hodoku/
@groslou99972 жыл бұрын
We can see in the Middle square we have the 368 triplet
@aok76_4 жыл бұрын
But but.. I found another swordfish with the eights. Rows 5, 8 and 9. I was waiting so eagerly to see if I was right. :(((
@OzymandiasSaysHi3 жыл бұрын
@Amr Okasha Unfortunately that is not a swordfish. All the possible entries in the 3 rows have to lineup in EXACTLY 3 columns. Your example has 4 columns occupied.
@alanclarke46462 жыл бұрын
Nope, I didn't see the swordfish, even after staring at for several minutes.