Hey KZbin Algorith, Simon and Mark do a wonderful job making these Cryptic Crosswords appealing to a wide audience and you should recommend them more!
@annabelleedwards50183 ай бұрын
I don't even do the cryptic crossword, but I just find these so enjoyable and interesting that I now look forward to them each Friday!
@khotsomoabi3 ай бұрын
Press running = urge on. Latest = last Pictures = pics
@davidfranklin54263 ай бұрын
Or “plastics” was considered the “latest” hot job for Benjamin (Dustin Hoffman) to pursue in the movie The Graduate, i.e. “in pictures.” 😅 Ok, I like your explanation better.
@benphelan883 ай бұрын
@@davidfranklin5426 I thought of exactly this too. It would warm my heart if it was the intent of the constructor.
@Antagony19603 ай бұрын
I think Simon got too convinced by 'press' = URGE, so never twigged it could also be SURGE. Clever clue!
@grmmmmhpph3 ай бұрын
@@Antagony1960 Arguing purely for the algorithm - It could be, but the construction has "pictures" as plural so I'm agreeing with "pics" :)
@47Jamm3 ай бұрын
Latest in pictures Last within pic P - last - ic
@blackbunnii97193 ай бұрын
Friday's edition of cracking the cryptic is always my fave ~
@debrabowen42763 ай бұрын
These cryptic crossword videos are a real high point of my week!
@bryanroland94023 ай бұрын
My favourite video of the week. I almost always learn something too. As for the ambiguity, "that has" can be contracted to "that's" when "has" is an auxiliary verb but not when it's the main verb. If we're meant to read it that way, then it isn't standard English. Very confusing.
@icecreamandsadness3 ай бұрын
Simon's dulcit tones helping to keep my dog calm with the fireworks going off randomly outside. Finished the video and she's finally curled up next to me asleep. Thanks Simon ❤🐶
@mafr953 ай бұрын
First time watching one of your crossword videos. This was absolutely amazing. My mind is honestly blown
@otterotterottercid3 ай бұрын
friday is my favorite day of the week solely for these videos! cryptic crossword superiority!
@willjohnsnow3 ай бұрын
The Quick Cryptics have been brutal on some days this week. Today's was a DOUBLE pangram by the way!
@mace97703 ай бұрын
I thought I was being thick!
@sue34583 ай бұрын
Yes you can spell Neal like that e.g. Neal Foulds (snooker player). Great video as always
@aang_arang3 ай бұрын
You have no idea how much I look forward to watching this video before bed every Friday
@waynethomas74063 ай бұрын
Simon, the shouting at the screen part is just an indication of how well you are teaching this content. Without spoilers, the two clues you are unsure of parsing, you have explained brilliantly previously and the fact that you sometimes struggle gives the rest of us great succour 🙏
@glum_hippo3 ай бұрын
The possibility that I will miss ALL of the sudoku solves in a week is higher than the possibility that I will miss the cryptic solve.
@sterling503 ай бұрын
Long time watcher from texas! These are hard puzzles especially since i dont understand most of the british slang, but it is very entertaining and fun to watch and learn. Crack on!
@Meowsma2 ай бұрын
Howdy from the Dallas area! It's always interesting to learn just how much British slang I am *completely* unaware of.
@sterling502 ай бұрын
@@Meowsma Yea absolutely! I often have caught myself saying Daft now when making a slight against myself and its fun to explain the origin of that word for myself being from a cracking the cryptic video series ha!
@mikechappell58493 ай бұрын
I was amused by how Simon, who is always on the lookout for pangrams, commented on all the weird letters in the quick crossword wihout noticing that it's a pangram
@ChairboyRules3 ай бұрын
Always love the Cryptic crossword.
@david.james.t.kirk273 ай бұрын
My favourite videos to watch right after coaching my Friday morning fitness class
@longwaytotipperary3 ай бұрын
❤to see these every week
@davidrattner93 ай бұрын
Been such a pleasure for us that he and Mark have kept these going for nearly 2 years ❤❤
@longwaytotipperary3 ай бұрын
@ absolutely!!! ❤️💜💙🩷
@sue34583 ай бұрын
Quick Cryptic double pangram!
@nsrikand13 ай бұрын
Excellent Simon!! Please keep it up! Great learning for us!!
@tamishea61983 ай бұрын
Thanks for the wonderful explanation of the clues!!! Watching your video gives me the courage to try these crosswords again ❤.
@weirdandlazy13 ай бұрын
These videos are my favorite to fall asleep to, then watch again during the day.
@katy-music3 ай бұрын
A leg is also part of a stage! It’s the hanging curtain that helps define the backstage area 🦵
@mitrisharaiha89163 ай бұрын
I love your channel so so much I’ve been watching since Covid times and absolutely love these cryptic crosswords. When Mark would complete the monthly special it was a joy to watch a master at work. These weekly Friday crosswords are amazing too it’s immense seeing you work these clues out so easily.
@toanoradian2 ай бұрын
1:19 Simon: "Where's Matthew, Mark-" Me: "Luke, and John?"
@joanabbott95313 ай бұрын
I very much enjoy these solves. Thank you Simon.
@Byron4183 ай бұрын
Love these cryptic solves! 🎉🎉🎉
@davidbennett13163 ай бұрын
I can usually manage the concise and never the cryptic so made my day to get three of these before you did - I love your humility. (And I couldn't remember some of the concise answers even though I solved (most of) it last week 😬)
@satchury3 ай бұрын
absolutely love your cryptic crossword solves! I cant imagine ever solving one myself though
@rpb4243 ай бұрын
I was waiting for you to go back and look at 'Plastic Surgeon' again at the end and try and work out why plastic didn't seem to be clued, but I guess the whole Hamburg/Homburg thing meant that got forgotten
@barrycross89523 ай бұрын
Latest = last Pictures = pics P last ics Simon confused himself by reading it as the latest letter of pictures.
@rpb4243 ай бұрын
@@barrycross8952 Ah yes, or course. Easy when you see it!
@discostoo3 ай бұрын
This is the content I subbed for. Double pangrams ftw.
@johnciolfi50853 ай бұрын
It’s funny, I put Hamburg in the puzzle when I solved it last night, but watching the video, I honestly couldn’t remember which one I’d put. I was probably saved by the fact that I just visited Hamburg a few weeks ago (lovely city, the city hall is tremendous and the franzbrötchen was delightful). It’s a shame so many people got caught out by that clue. Also, I think your fuselage troubles might come from the word fusillade, which is a volley of bullets (from the French word fusil - rifle).
@Anne_Mahoney3 ай бұрын
Another Friday, another crossword video: it doesn't get any better than that! 😸💚
@romanthompson20242 ай бұрын
Best episode of the week
@mr_enigma3 ай бұрын
Thank you, Simon, I love these videos!
@leonhardeuler6753 ай бұрын
Love the cryptic crosswords. I remember back in the day when it alternated between the crosswords and the sudoku (or something like that). It really is invaluable to have such an authoritative place to point people who want to get started with them.
@willygetssilly3 ай бұрын
I love these videos, they are my favourite!
@konstantinosadamopoulos99183 ай бұрын
These have been very helpful for helping me in my cryptic crossword journey
@andrewgrant65163 ай бұрын
I prefer my version. A container for ashes is an urn. A second container for ashes is Mo' Urn. Mo' urn, mo' problems.
@colej.banning24193 ай бұрын
That was my interpretation too before I heard Simon's explanation.
@Antagony19603 ай бұрын
I really didn't understand this comment, so I used my Google fu to glean that "mo’" is American (maybe Ebonics) slang for "more". If so, that _does_ work, but most Brits - i.e. the primary target audience for The Times - wouldn't get it. "Mo’" for "more" is not in any _British_ dictionary I can find.
@limegreenelevator3 ай бұрын
For the ambiguous one, I think the reason it's HAMBURG and not HOMBURG is the substitution indicator. "Key for Oscar" suggests an A taking the place of an O, and _that_ goes in just one direction. (I'd think "O for A" would suggest "HOMBURG" as correct, but not "A for O.") I do agree that the ambiguity in the linking indicators makes it much, much more difficult though.
@homewort-gf2ni3 ай бұрын
I politely disagree that A for O generalIy means replace an O with an A; to me it reads more as replace an A with an O! It's funny we interpret things definitely, and does mean this clue is definitely ambigious! I think that it's more likely clueing Hamburg as the correct answer because the instruction makes more sense that way (i.e. you have the word for hat and then do something with it, rather than you do something to a word you don't have yet). An unfair clue, imo, but lovely work as always, Simon.
@homewort-gf2ni3 ай бұрын
For example, if a sign read '£2 for a lolly', you expect to pay £2 and receive a lolly, not give a lolly and get £2!
@limegreenelevator3 ай бұрын
@@homewort-gf2ni interesting, I've always seen in in cryptics as "A comes in for O" rather than "A goes out for O." Certainly raises questions about its use as a substitution indicator.
@Willd2p23 ай бұрын
@@homewort-gf2ni I think the context is doing almost all of the work there though. A sign that said "lolly for £2" would also be read in the same way you imply. In this clue specifically I think with any reading of the contraction "that's" it only really makes sense to be read the way it was intended. I.e. in both "A that is X for Y [from B]" and "B that has X for Y [giving A]" I personally can only really parse that as X replacing Y and it meaning the opposite would feel very wrong. I do agree that the clue could have been worded better though - even just swapping the words Hat and City in the clue would be less ambiguous to me at least.
@PotmosHetoimos3 ай бұрын
I think the “for” can be comfortably read either way, but in terms of the linking, “in” suggests to me that the substitution is taking place IN the city.
@emilywilliams32373 ай бұрын
I definitely enjoy these. Thanks, Simon!
@royston19283 ай бұрын
I love these videos!
@Majorr863 ай бұрын
The "Mass Extinction" is probably a bit tricky because the wordplay partially plays upon the other wordplay instead of the intended answer directly. An extinction does not precede a mass necessarily, but it would precede a funeral mass, or requiem.
@DadgeCity3 ай бұрын
Yes, Simon was reading the answer instead of the clue.
@aljones27uk3 ай бұрын
Helping you help the algorithm as you help me improve my solving!
@archivist173 ай бұрын
This cryptic video is a highlight every week! I do try to feed the algorithm each week.
@oscarbarnes21303 ай бұрын
Love these videos!
@MarcMcMillin3 ай бұрын
can't belive it's almost been two years!! Love these 🙂
@missioncardiac75993 ай бұрын
Michael Tippett, English composer, 1905-1988. So allowable by the old rules. Apart from the hat/city problem, not quite taken with Mass extinction.
@Willd2p23 ай бұрын
Mass extinction seems perfectly fine to me. A requiem is specifically a mass following a death, and extinction certainly implies death, so "requiem" gives Mass and "what it follows" gives Extinction in the sense that a requiem could certainly follow an extinction of life.
@foxmitten14433 ай бұрын
I love these videos! more cryptics
@Di0nysiac3 ай бұрын
boo to the algorithm! I learned how to do cryptic crosswords watching these videos and never miss an episode.
@mrsstrople2 ай бұрын
I think all the Only Connect I watch lead my algorithm in this direction 👍
@Sgray-ep7se3 ай бұрын
love how the Quick Cryptic turned out to be a pangram
@skullsNscalps2 ай бұрын
I have been trying to solve cryptic puzzles since high school. Now I just watch.
@duncanwilliamson32423 ай бұрын
Highlight of my week as alway
@A_CC_K3 ай бұрын
Best part of a Friday morning/mid afternoon.
@TheMacabreTavern3 ай бұрын
Ended up on Tippett myself because a tip would be at the end, and I just remember the composer.
@cameronnall16643 ай бұрын
Keep these puzzles coming. And KZbin keep recommending these
@GalagoShogi2 ай бұрын
50:52 - There goes Maverick again!
@karimmaasri17233 ай бұрын
Another fantastic solve by Simon.
@Waldemar-108113 ай бұрын
Great video as always
@OUdarling3 ай бұрын
On the quick cryptic - you were likely conflating fuselage with fusillade, which have their first two syllables in common. Thank you for the solves and the explanation!
@vickikaye21703 ай бұрын
Simon! Sir Michael Tippett indeed!
@krisposkett3 ай бұрын
Best videos on the channel!
@cumulus8883 ай бұрын
always enjoy the crossword video.
@davidotoole93283 ай бұрын
Forgotten how much I enjoy this. I've five unfilled and wondering when you'll find a stinker (or not).
@johanneshasund25713 ай бұрын
I'm just in pure awe 😮
@nickr31153 ай бұрын
Very enjoyable, as always.
@christhecyclist59983 ай бұрын
Thank you as always
@MarkBennet100013 ай бұрын
Love these videos. Quick Cryptic is pangram.
@richardrusson75283 ай бұрын
It's a double pangram!
@MarkBennet100013 ай бұрын
@@richardrusson7528 Amazing - I saw afterwards
@davidrattner93 ай бұрын
Easily these make my Friday mornings so much more enjoyable!!!
@ranajamal38483 ай бұрын
Great solve as always
@garrettsmith97883 ай бұрын
A comment for the all powerful algorithm!
@RSDonovan3 ай бұрын
Robert throws out mild expletive (7)
@jbftcmof3 ай бұрын
I got my first ever full clue before you in this puzzle. 28 across. Now I just have to stop pausing the video so much :)
@mikaylaalford50623 ай бұрын
Always love
@grenvillephillips69983 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@missioncardiac75993 ай бұрын
Enjoyable as always
@Emmibean773 ай бұрын
Come on Algorithm!!! There videos are the best
@brycecrux27303 ай бұрын
my fave as well, many thanks
@WrathOfAnima3 ай бұрын
These videos are the only vids of yours I watch usually, figure it out already, algorithm! (Nothing against your sudoku/other puzzle videos, I'm just stumped enough by cryptics 😅)
@cheeseonhead3 ай бұрын
Hey algo, this vid is good
@andrewkitching93393 ай бұрын
Great video Simon! I went for HAMBURG, but failed with the game, biffing HALLA rather carelessly. Otherwise I found it straightforward, but admired the elegant clues.
@5t7573 ай бұрын
Commenting for engagement and to say please keep making these videos. At sudoku I can routinely match your and Mark's solves but in cryptic crosswords you are Messi and Ronaldo levels of magnitude better than me and I enjoy watching the best solvers in the game solve them.
@mjkluck3 ай бұрын
Good stuff, Bubs.
@MrBileDuct2 ай бұрын
I love Cryptic too! - Algorithms - less so!
@GeorgeFrideric713 ай бұрын
I like these videos.
@repand13 ай бұрын
Let's get it together algorithm
@annastevenson273 ай бұрын
Friday Fav.
@simonb6702133 ай бұрын
Was very taken with Simon’s tiara in the thumbnail.
@timrutherford-johnson70032 ай бұрын
Tippett is Sir Michael (as others have pointed out), but "Wanting Tippett" is a great name for something. Maybe a cat.
@Revenant77x3 ай бұрын
That clue was rather unfair, no wonder it was tripping everyone up. Excellent video as always.
@Cunningprof3 ай бұрын
Banger
@Fortunalux19 күн бұрын
Commenting on this ancient controversy for the algorithm. I think a justification for [city] over [hat] is that A is the key letter of "that's" - I'm sure I've seen 'key' used as a 'take the middle letter(s)' indicator. So if you have the key of "that's" for Oscar, the clue only works in one direction, since there is no Oscar in [city]. But the other reading still legitimises [hat], of course, so the clue needed to be fixed.
@shellmichael96653 ай бұрын
Let’s go, algorithm. Just figure it out already.
@bloodspatteredguitar3 ай бұрын
The Requiem (rest) Mass is the Mass for the Dead. Requiems-specifically, rather than Masses in general-therefore follow death=extinction. As an aside, I had the privilege of singing the ancient chants of the Requiem Mass this Saturday for the Commemoration of the Faithful Departed.
@danbanks93253 ай бұрын
Algorithm we LOVE this videos 🤩🤩
@artyonehundred3 ай бұрын
Personally I think "that's" is not usually a contraction for "that has", and there is still that trailing "in" to explain!
@Biddlebum3 ай бұрын
In cryptic clues, whether A usually means B doesn’t matter. If A can mean B, that’s enough. And in a statement like “Here’s a puzzle that’s been solved by Simon”, ‘that’s’ can only mean ‘that has’. There is some debate about allowing “A that’s B” to mean A+B, as the “has” in real life usage of “that’s” is always an indication of past tense. “Simon has a computer” would never be converted to “Simon’s a computer on his desk”, and that’s(!) the meaning you very often need to understand, with “has” meaning that the computer is close to Simon.
@thescrewfly3 ай бұрын
Dear Sir/Madam Algorithm, kindly allow CTC to crack these cryptic crosswords to their hearts and minds' content. And take these videos seriously. This is engagement, dammit!