Keeper has really been building out their template capabilities for firm and non-closing tasks! They just started a community template sharing section - still pretty bare-bones, but growing!
@jasoncpaАй бұрын
Keeper is excellent!
@RomeoHatesShrimp8 күн бұрын
The letter P in "Jason" stands for PracticeCS
@fullsendfinanceАй бұрын
Gonna need a BHall Mainstream Tech vs Accounting Tech debate.
@jasoncpaАй бұрын
Ya rite in that guy's dreams
@billlincoln7345Ай бұрын
People love to bag on Practice CS, and I get it. However, I don't think people realize that Practice CS was incredibly innovative for its time (it came out about 25 years ago - having software work with the internet was barely a thing at that time). It has a steep learning curve and TR should have done a much better job with training users (they always wanted to charge thousands for training, so most firms had staff wing it). They also shouldn't have sold modules separately - firms would buy the base package with the client management module and think they were set. Then, find out that they needed to spend another chunk of money on the project management module to get what they really needed - which is very frustrating! That said, the capabilities were way ahead of other options available at that time. I suspect that most modern PMs have learned from PCS. (It's like comparing a 25 year old car to a new car. Sure, the new car is better - but it has the benefit of 25 years of development.)
@jasoncpaАй бұрын
Love this context, thank you Bill
@billlincoln7345Ай бұрын
While I have a lot of respect for the contribution that Practice CS made to practice management tools, where my "car analogy" falls apart is that a car manufacturer doesn't have much ability to improve their product after it leaves the dealership. A software company can / should make periodic updates to their product. I've worked for 3 firms that use PCS, and I started using PCS about 15 years ago. I honestly can't recall a significant update during that time. While developers of modern PM tools learned from PCS and improved upon its shortcomings and expanded upon its positives - TR should be ashamed that they haven't been doing that all along.
@keeper_appАй бұрын
Happy to be here 💜
@billlincoln7345Ай бұрын
Does anyone have a "feature comparison grid" available that compares Firm360, Karbon, Canopy, Qount, etc?
@jasoncpaАй бұрын
I did one in Q4 of last year that hasn't changed too much since then go.rlz.io/pm
@maggieyang135Ай бұрын
Hi Jason, as your daily podcast listener and a new/small tax firm owner, I'm planning to choose either Financial Cents or Firm 360 to start my tiny practice among myself and 2 contractors. I don't know which of the two options I should choose. Want your input.
@jasoncpaАй бұрын
Depends on your firm! If you haven't yet, run through the tool linked in the vid description, that'll give you a "top" recommendation
@maggieyang135Ай бұрын
@@jasoncpa I just booked a live Demo with each of the two in few days. Thank you Jason!
@FirelandsAccounting2 күн бұрын
@@maggieyang135Which one did you choose? And what has your experience been with it?
@SammyMaeQАй бұрын
Me breathing a sigh of relief that we switched to one of your picks LAST year. 😅
@jasoncpaАй бұрын
WHEW
@emeraldcornerАй бұрын
Tax Software PM = Ew. 🤢This was a super interesting one...not that your others are not. lol😂 I'm constantly torn by whether or not I'm in the right platform, or if I should make a change This was good to be able to quickly go through the pros and cons of each. Thank you!
@jasoncpaАй бұрын
Yeah that perpetual anxiety of whether you're on the right stuff is real. Hard to turn that off