Religions were born to guide Humanity towards the righteous path but today the Religion is being used as a tool for RACISM..
@ritzmarcos77335 ай бұрын
To hear this from a Muslim guy is indeed a good thing. Thanks for being rationale Muslim. Good Man.
@ranjitraval93185 ай бұрын
👍
@mohdaadil13565 ай бұрын
@@ritzmarcos7733 bro Our Prophet Muhammad ( Peace be upon him) told us to gain knowledge and more knowledge but nowadays Muslims are misguided by Western and they are not following their religion
@MeenaMahamana5 ай бұрын
Let us all remove religion and be a human. Religion is outdated and it's stopping our evolution
@techsa26755 ай бұрын
😂😂@@mohdaadil1356
@manojoy69136 ай бұрын
😂 dinosaur kisi KATHIT Bhagwan Allah God ki sawari nahi bana kyuki dharam BANANE walo ko unke bare me nahi pata tha 😂
@VishalYadav000035 ай бұрын
Ha yaar, insaan ki soch simit hoti h
@anamelessmonster5 ай бұрын
Yeh toh mene kabhi ni socha
@sarojwadhwa33095 ай бұрын
@@VishalYadav00003soch chhoti thi tabhi to nooh ki nav or jalparlay ki kalpna ki gi h q ki jitna dikha vahan bahut bdi baad ai hogi kabhi
@VishalYadav000035 ай бұрын
@sarojwadhwa3309 true, lol
@dv92395 ай бұрын
ye bhi toh baat hai ki bharat ke bahar rehne wale janwar jaise Giraffe aur Hippo bhi kisi bhagwaan ke sawari nahi hai
@pnirmal59007 ай бұрын
Aaj k date me agar Geetha, Quran aur Bible likhe jaate, toh usme nuclear weapon, clean energy,5g network aur hyper loop milenge.
@blood9415 ай бұрын
What about tik tok🙃
@devssxd5 ай бұрын
But gita is not written normally it is need of human
@pnirmal59005 ай бұрын
@@devssxd Theek hai bhai
@AashishChansoria5 ай бұрын
@@pnirmal5900 But Hindu scriptures do talk of planets which couldn't have been discovered with the naked eye. Wo kidhar see aaya bhai? Boldo random thoughts the?
@ananyaairani23205 ай бұрын
@@AashishChansoria Because centuries ago sky appeared much more clear than now, so most of the planets would be visible to our naked eyes. So our ancestors might have added their own fantasies and create stories about "Navagraha". Also,they called the Sun and the moon as "grahas" which they clearly aren't. Even if they simply guessed the existence of these planets, what are you trying to conclude? that they had modern technology? Or that Gods existed back then?
@mdhvdubey5 ай бұрын
Humans created all gods and claimed that their gods created them. 😮
@bampsgamesmore62225 ай бұрын
Yes right they are andhbhakt 😂
@letmeknnow49025 ай бұрын
Bhakt Word Hi Scam He
@SanketKailasIngale5 ай бұрын
@@bampsgamesmore6222 just like other religions say that humans are not made by gods😒, tell me in which religion they didnt say this, and yes i am not talking about new religions evolving nowdays, literally every freaking old religion present on this planet say that our god made humans. But no, we want to look cool by calling a particualr religion's followers as andhbhakts, just listen agar thora dum hai toh baki religions ko bhi keh, its easy to mock a community everywhere when it's tolerant, everyone has thier own belief, jisko follow karna hai voh kare jo nahi chahta voh na kare simple! I am a hindu and i clearly say that we were not created by a person but we evolved from a certain species lakhs of years back!
@Tzhar_5 ай бұрын
From my teenage years until I turned 21, I was an atheist raised in a Muslim family. However, through studying science, philosophy, and concepts of humanity, I have come to believe in God. Religion encompasses various aspects that one may or may not agree with, but believing in something beyond what the world sees as God is a distinct matter. It's noteworthy that one of the greatest scientists of all time, Albert Einstein, believed in God. I extend an invitation to you to join a live stream discussion with Mufti Yaseer Nadeem, exploring the perspectives of atheists versus believers in God.
@mdhvdubey5 ай бұрын
@@Tzhar_ we can never know if god exists or not but we can easily check if allah is a god or not. How? Read quran. If you find a single statement that can be disproven. The author cannot be god. I gave you a question seek the answer. Einstein didn’t believe in any religious god. He believed in god of spinoza which is very different from Allah. God of Spinoza doesn’t concern himself with the fate and doings of mankind. Allah on the other hand claims that he’s the one doing everything. Both are polar opposites.
@tularammeshram21705 ай бұрын
धर्म मनुष्य के लिए है ना की मनुष्य धर्म के लिए।😊 मसलन धर्म मनुष्य की ही उपज है।😊
@AashishChansoria5 ай бұрын
Ofcourse Dharma was created by humans. We don't have aasmani kitaab concept. But the humans who created it had far more IQ than this Vimoh bot.
@tularammeshram21705 ай бұрын
@@AashishChansoria आप क्या कहने का प्रयास कर रहे है मि. चौरसिया ? साफ- साफ कहिए!
@@tularammeshram2170 वो कहना चाहते है की हमारे महान ऋषियों ने धर्म को बनाया ताकि लोगो के अंदर एक मोरल कांसेप्ट रहे की क्या चीज ज्यादा सही है या कम गलत है और क्या चीज कम सही है और ज्यादा गलत है। भारत के धर्म दर्शन और विज्ञान से जुड़े हुए है जो एक तरफ हमे खोजने को कहते है और दूसरी ओर अच्छे व्यव्हार को प्रेरित करते है। हमारे पूर्वज ने धर्म बनाया और इसमें किसी को क्या दिक्कत है। आज भारत में क्राइम रेट दूसरे देशों की तुलना में काफी कम है, रेप और मर्डर की संख्या प्रति लाख व्यक्ति में बहुत कम है क्यों? क्योंकि लोग धर्म में विश्वास रखते है वो इस चीज में विश्वास रखते है की जैसा करेगें वैसा पाएंगे। खुद को नास्तिक मानने वाले धर्म को क्वेश्चन कर सही है कोई दिक्कत नही लेकिन fact के साथ। परंपरा धर्म हो जरूरी नहीं है। और आज लोग आज पास में जो ट्रेडिशन चला आ रहा उसको धर्म बताने पे लगे है और उसका विरोध कर रहे की धर्म गलत है। धर्म है क्या पहले ये समझे और फिर बोले की इसमें क्या गलत है
@VivekKumarChauhan-bh1kn5 ай бұрын
@@AashishChansoria ofcourse Vimoh se jada jaankari rakhte the vo log. Lekin dharam ko hamesa sahi bataya jaata hai kuoki use bhagwan se joda jaata hai. Kya ye fraud nahi hai. For example: Bhageshwar baba apne tricks se kuch logo ka ilaaj kar deta hai, lekin iska matlab yeh nahi ki jo vo kar raha hai theek hi kar raha hai. Basically he is cheating people, kuoki saare log uske paas hope leke jaate hai ki, hamara bhi ilaaj ho jaayega. Dharam bhi bhagwan ke naam pe logo ko chuna laga raha hai
@RajeshDas-gp7wf5 ай бұрын
I believe in both God and Science, but if there's ever any inconsistency between them, I always side with Science.
@surajdivakar34495 ай бұрын
Same here
@JaydeepMakwana-l3t5 ай бұрын
You still can't see the inconsistency? 😅
@amkai29285 ай бұрын
What I think let me tell in 2 different theories: This World is Matrix, we are living in Simulation while people who are beyond this Matrix are just looking at us and understanding the nature of Human Psychology and comparing with Themselves. They added Gods in different Religions, and they let people who are living in Matrix to learn about Religion and God. They're trying to understand what Human chooses between Religion and Science. Otherwise Real Gods are those who are Beyond Matrix. Maybe, God exists and knows everything, he's everywhere and in everything. He didn't created any religion or caste etc. But some greedy people created it by making False Stories etc. For supremacy over others. Brahmins ofc. Also, we knows Brahmins were Aryans as well.
@kaviankit21415 ай бұрын
Inconsistencies can be raised due to lack of knowledge also.... A discovery which is yet to be made is considered as matter of mockery by the so called intellectuals... Universal phenomenons are always there, we can't say that someone's texts are fake because we haven't discovered its miracles yet....
@VY-zt3ph5 ай бұрын
YOu still are delusional. It is like "Abhi and Niyu" logic. Also its similar to - "I am a BJP supporter but I will watch Pathan"
@LifeOfGopal08 ай бұрын
Interesting perspective, I agree on most of your points. But for the modern Hindu faith i wanna share my perspective - Since ancient times Hindu Faith does have an evolutionary and flexible nature. "Dharyate Iti Dharma" - Dharm ko Dharan kara jata hain. The meaning of Dharm is not religion as per shastras. Religion is a modern connotation used for it. I won't be speaking for a whole community but as much i've read - Dharm wahi hain jo Samay, Paristhithi aur Kaal ke hisab se badal jaye. I'll try to explain it in detail. Homo Sapiens evolved around 25 lakh years ago. Around 70,000 years ago the use of language was developed. Neolithic revolution took place around 10,000 years ago. And then around 2000 BCE Philosophy is said to be traced in the Indian Subcontinent. Around 6th Century for the Western part of the world. (Thales) It is said that philosophy is the mother of all sciences and disciplines. And the origins of modern Hindu faith can be traced back to the Vedic or Pre Vedic Age (1500 BCE) THIS WAS THE FIRST PHASE OF INDIC PHILOSOPHY. From their evolved the Age of Upanishads - from where almost all modern Hindu beliefs can be traced. Then happened the development of the 9 Indic Schools of Philosophy. Out of which 6 were Orthodox and 3 were Hetrodox. (here atheism means that they did not believed in the Vedas as supreme authority) Then the advent of Islam and further evolution of the Vedic tradition in the form of Advait Vedant, Dwaitvad, Sikhism. Then happened the Renaissance : around 19th Century to take a stand against the foreign religions, all these sects which were divided but had common roots were merged into one umbrella which Paul Hacker called Neo Hinduism/ Neo Vedanta. Which is modern day Hinduism. Then the struggle for equality (Arya Samaj, Brahm Samaj, Swami Vivekanand ji, Navyana Buddhism) So I don't see a rigid, non changable, non questionable religion here. This is a tradition of Debates, Proofs and Criticism of what's outdated and not required. Dharm wo hain jo Samay, Paristhithi aur Kaal ke hisab se badal jaye. But if you'll compare it with the age of universe, it actually is modern in that sense. But as history and philosophy is concerned it is ancient. And yes i believe we as the descendants of such great ancestors should carry forward their legacy of debate, criticism, logic, with merging all information and tools present to us.
@minhazali40905 ай бұрын
Good and almost accurate explanation
@Tushar91825 ай бұрын
Bro the clarity of your opinion is outstanding you have a in-depth knowledge of our Dharma.🤯 More power to you want people like you in my friends circle 👏🙌
@SATYAPRAKASH-rm5jt5 ай бұрын
Fair explanation. Good. But what about the WhatsApp university Andh-bhakts, intoxicated and ready to die followers, etc. Of course followers of every religion. Majority of the followers of every religion due to lack of discourse, dialogue, not tolerant to dissent, criticisms etc are making their Organised Religion a stinking rotting and enclosed pond. Don't want to connect with sweet fresh water of perennial resources of science friendly, human rights friendly and women friendly. The rites rituals and dogmas of All Organised Religions more or less do not comply with the Basic principles of Human rights and Women's at large. They are opposed to all the new ideas, reviews, revisions and reforms. May sense prevails to them.
@VivekKumarChauhan-bh1kn5 ай бұрын
yep you are absolutely right. You understand it because you deep knowledge of Hindu Religion origin and its core value. The way you presented your views, it deliberately suggest that GOD has no importance in this,
@harikrishnanr19715 ай бұрын
Well said❤
@hitendradaraji38776 ай бұрын
जितने भी धर्म उत्पन्न हुए वह उसे समय के समाज को ठीक चलाने के लिए बनाएगए थे लेकिन वर्तमान समय मे बने हुए नियमों का जिसे हम धर्मकहते हैं उसमें परिवर्तन करनापड़ेगा या उसे छोड़ना पड़ेगा लेकिन इंसान यह करने को तैयार नहीं
@jeeetkr5 ай бұрын
केवल एक ही धर्म है बाकी सभी अलग-अलग रास्ते हैं
@YGP-fr7rvАй бұрын
ऐसा लगता है कि आप धर्म और संप्रदाय को एक समझते हैं ।
@iamrebel6605 ай бұрын
Hindu Vedic Dharam itna Prachin he ki unhe Dionsaur,Kangaru,Tasmanian Tiger,Mamoth ke bare pata hi nahi tha😂
@devssxd5 ай бұрын
Nhi hai bhai 7000 ago hi hau 😊
@NFSSID5 ай бұрын
Dinosaur is Prehistoric, Kangroo and Tasmanian tiger Australia Mai tha kaise pata hoga Australia tak pehla human 5000 sal Tak nahi gaya
@Rao_sahab_4005 ай бұрын
@@NFSSID pehle saari tectonic plates ek he thi jiski wajah se atleast insaan har jagah paaye jaate hain
@sasmalprasanjit27645 ай бұрын
So does Jesus, Mohammad who never knew about Dinosaur 😂😂 But question is can u say to them on their face !
@Rao_sahab_4005 ай бұрын
@@sasmalprasanjit2764 Mr. burnol user islam is 1400 years ago and christianity is 2000 years ago, though we say it on their face as well...
@bornwithfreefire467 Жыл бұрын
Hey Vimoh, This is the most beneficial channel I've ever found. I hope people increase their scientific temperament & understand the real value of this channel. Lot's of Love & Respect To You ❤️😇⚛️.
@mdmudhussain2 жыл бұрын
Wow! Hats off vimoh! Excellent point 🔥🔥
@oee_ammu4 ай бұрын
Wo Quran ki hu baat krra h😂
@SriHarshaChilakapati2 жыл бұрын
Is there an English only channel of yours, Vimoh? You're doing a great job with these. However, since Hindi is not popular in the South, I have to listen at 0.5x speed to understand some words. If you can keep it to English, or have a separate English only channel, it'll help reach a lot more people.
@vimoh2 жыл бұрын
See my latest community tab post about this
@warrior_of_liberation2 жыл бұрын
@@vimoh Include subtitles in all your contents. Like, if its mostly Hindi, use English subtitles n vice versa. This way everybody could enjoy all your contents, irrespective of language. Just a suggestion. If you can do this, please do. This channel really needs to grow. Language barrier shouldn't be constraint. ✌🏻
@sneha66526 ай бұрын
Can you make a video on Acharya Prashant. A reply to him on atheism . Wo har jagah hamesha dharm aur ved/vedant ghusata rehta hai. Usse koi debate karta to bolta kitna padha hai ved blah blah. I feel like he's another baba in market to make money out of spirituality. @@vimoh
@SriHarshaChilakapati6 ай бұрын
@@bryxxdore4150 Check your facts, India never had a national language. And it never will.
@sneha66526 ай бұрын
@@bryxxdore4150 pehle school ho aao tum phir dusro ko Gyan dena
@dhananjayshinde85 ай бұрын
What a reply to religion, what a explanation. Please इस कंटेंट को सभी देखें।
@Maximilian_Robespieer5 ай бұрын
Abhe oh sanatan dharm 10000 saal se earth par hai first dharam hai
@MeenaMahamana5 ай бұрын
@@Maximilian_Robespieer proof? Did you not watch this video?
@VivekKumarChauhan-bh1kn5 ай бұрын
@@Maximilian_Robespieer The oldest time we can trace Hinduism is 3300 BCE. There is no evidence of Hinduism before then. 10000 saal pehle se sanatan dharam exist karta hai, kaha se proof aaya yeh bhai
@VishalKumarKondal-dy2sk5 ай бұрын
@@VivekKumarChauhan-bh1kn Bhai 3300 bce ka tere pass kon sa sabut hai. 3300 bce ek hypothesis hai asal men kitana purana hai koi proof nahi hai.
@SandeepKumar-qk7wl5 ай бұрын
@@Maximilian_Robespieermai tumhe murkh se jyada kuchh nhi kas sakta, history geography padho,
@upendrashrimali28716 ай бұрын
Really Intellectual summary. ❤
@shivendunarayan5 ай бұрын
कृपया धर्म शब्द के स्थान पर पंथ शब्द का प्रयोग करें। धर्म का अर्थ ईश्वर में विश्वास और पूजा पद्धति नहीं है। ये सब पंथ के अंदर आता है। नास्तिक और चार्वाक दर्शन भी सनातन दर्शन का भाग रहा है। बीती सहस्राब्दियों में निरंतर ईश्वर के होने पर सनातन समाज और विद्वान शास्त्रार्थ करते रहे हैं। विश्व में सनातन के अलावा किसी दूसरे पंथ ने ईश्वर पर प्रश्न aur शास्त्रार्थ नहीं किया। जैन, हीनयान बौद्ध और आजीविका इसी शास्त्रार्थ k की उपज थे। सामाज में सभ्यता परंपराओं से ही आती है, और धार्मिक पंथ सामाज को परंपराओं को बनाए रखने का तंत्र देते हैं। इसीलिए पंथ सामाज के लिए आवश्यक हैं।
@adventure.guruji5 ай бұрын
भाई ये अंधज्ञानी है, एक बार के लिए मूर्ख दूसरे की बात सुनने की सुनने और समझने की सोच सकता है लेकिन ये अंधज्ञानी नहीं।।
@pokemon_454595 ай бұрын
Kuch bhi,😂
@AveragepoliticsEnjoyer4 ай бұрын
@@adventure.gurujiTu jaake debate kar teri saari hawa nikal lega kya evidence hae tumre Ishwar ka?
@adventure.guruji4 ай бұрын
@@AveragepoliticsEnjoyer मैं मेरे ईश्वर को मानता हूं, जब भी दुविधा मैं होता हूं वो मेरी मदद करता है हर परेशानी से निकाल देता है। मेरे लिए यही उसका सबसे बड़ा प्रमाण है।☺️
@AveragepoliticsEnjoyer4 ай бұрын
@@adventure.guruji Anecdotal evidence is not proof people can say legendary giraffes help them when they're in trouble are you gonna believe that ? and you call others stupid 🤣pahle theek se arguments karna sikho warna chup raho.
@KarodpatiQuestions2 күн бұрын
We heard about Aghasur, was a huge reptile and that is what the dinosaurs are supposed to be. So therefore in the 8.4 million species that the Padma Purana talks about, the large number of reptile species that are talked about, include gigantic size reptiles, which is what our modern nomenclature calls dinosaurs.
@Tzhar_5 ай бұрын
From my teenage years until I turned 21, I was an atheist raised in a Muslim family. However, through studying science, philosophy, and concepts of humanity, I have come to believe in God. Religion encompasses various aspects that one may or may not agree with, but believing in something beyond what the world sees as God is a distinct matter. It's noteworthy that one of the greatest scientists of all time, Albert Einstein, believed in God. I extend an invitation to you to join a live stream discussion with Mufti Yaseer Nadeem, exploring the perspectives of atheists versus believers in God.
@vfxkaif80515 ай бұрын
Same situation
@aapVxvb5 ай бұрын
ISLAM is truth. There must be intelligent creator of this fine tuned universe which we call God/ Allah
@joswinnoronha17395 ай бұрын
The Bible's best description of a dinosaur-like animal is recorded in Job chapter 40. “Look at the behemoth, which I made along with you and which feeds on grass like an ox. What strength he has in his loins, what power in the muscles of his belly! His tail sways like a cedar; the sinews of his thighs are close-knit. His bones are tubes of bronze, his limbs like rods of iron. He ranks first among the works of God…” (Job 40:15-19).
@pokemon_454595 ай бұрын
@@aapVxvbproof ?
@St4321d4 ай бұрын
Bhai ek baat batao.tum keya islam ka sab kuch believe karte ho?matlab islam sahi baki others philosophy galat yea mante ho?
@aakashkrishan20165 ай бұрын
Mujhe to ye samajh nhi AA rha galaxy ki jankari or multiverse ka concept sanatan me kese❓
@riteshshanky5285 ай бұрын
Only manipulation h bhai.. bat kuch aur and meaning kuch aur .. same aap kuran uta ke dek lo usme likha kuch aur gya h logo ne usko black hole, galaxy aur pta ni jane kya kya proof kr diya😏😏😏😏😏
@EsaiyaXalxo-s4d4 ай бұрын
Aarya Bhatt name suna hai
@aakashkrishan20164 ай бұрын
@@EsaiyaXalxo-s4d है तो सनातनी ही जय श्री राम 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
@EsaiyaXalxo-s4d4 ай бұрын
Han Bhai hai sanatani hai lekin unhone khoj ki isliye vigyaan apni jagah par aur dharam apni jagah par
@AveragepoliticsEnjoyer4 ай бұрын
Kya galaxy ki jankari hae? Multiverse ek hypothesis hae uska sach hone se tumra Sanatan sach nahi hojata.
@kshitizsinghias5 ай бұрын
नास्तिकों की सबसे बड़ी समस्या यह है कि उन्हें धर्म के basics ही पता नहीं होते हैं लिहाजा अपने आप ही धर्म के बारे जो मन में आता है, गढ़ते रहते हैं। क्योंकि इन्हें धर्म के बारे में केवल उतना ही पता होता है जितना वे धर्म के नाम पर अपने आस-पास होता हुआ देखते हैं इसलिए सबसे बेहतर यह है कि पहले धर्म की सही परिभाषा जानिए उसके बाद इसके बारे में कोई बात कीजिए।
@Aksh-w9k5 ай бұрын
Sahi kaha
@jeeetkr5 ай бұрын
तुम सही हो मेरे भाई
@SandeepKumar-qk7wl5 ай бұрын
Achha , tum bataa do, mai nastik hu , mujhe nhi lagta tumhe mujhse jyada pataa hoga, dharm ke to bhut saare arth hote ha, but jab koi dharm word ka use kare to use panth hi samajho, samany taur par ham panth ki jagah dharm word ka use kar lete ha, isliye constitution me panth word ka use Kiya gya ha
@AnandKumar-ty9qs11 күн бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@AnandKumar-ty9qs11 күн бұрын
L@@ndbhakt sacchai sun kar dukhi ho gaya... Ye batao ki Shankar Bhagwan subah barf par hi fresh hote hain ya bathroom banwaye hain😂😂😂
@krpzasd5 ай бұрын
मतलब कुछ भी.... सनातन में ऋग्वेद सबसे पुराना है उसमे 10 वे मंडल का 129 वा सूक्त है "नासदीय सूक्त" उसमे ब्रह्मांड की उत्पत्ति का लिखा है कैसे हुआ। और जब कोई कहता है की सनातन Ancient है तो इसका मतलब ऐसे समझो की अगर सनातन को आए एक दिन हुआ तो बाकी पंथों को आए 1 घंटा भी नही हुआ। इतना सबको पता है की मनुष्यों के अलावा किसी और प्रजाति धर्म समझने का सामर्थ्य नही है तो धर्म और पंथों का ज्ञान मनुष्यों के आने के बाद ही होगा। कुछ नया नही बता रहे हो, बस उलटे सीधे तर्क लगा के सनातन को नीचा दिखाने का ओछा प्रयास कर रहे हो
@himanshuchouhan88554 ай бұрын
Bhrmand ki utpati k bare main hr dharm maan se bnayi huVi ki baate kahaniya likhi hai sirf likh dene se koi baat sach nhi ho jati hai
@ripudamanzАй бұрын
@@himanshuchouhan8855 true bro
@sk....30493 күн бұрын
Gpood gatha
@thepartimerambler9855 ай бұрын
As long as a religion talks about the whole world as a family, non-violence as its core principle, free to put your faith in any celestial body, talks about Love and compassion towards every living being be it human, animal or plants.. I don't care if the religion is made by God or Human themselves.. 🙏
@singh37583 ай бұрын
Bhai apki baat bilkul thik h... M bht logo se questions poochta hu pr unke paas mere ek bhi question ka answer nhi hota h....or unke claims ko reject krne vale questions ye h.... 1. Agr Brahma ne dharti banayi to saare dham India meh hi kyu banaye. 2. Hindu scriptures meh india ke alava kahi or ki baat hi nhi kri gyi h kyuki tb Etna trevel Kiya hi nhi gya tha. 3. Na to Hindu dharma meh nuclear weapons ki koi baat hoti h or dinosaurs ki. 4. Hindu dharma basically space ke baare m bs planets ke baare m claim krta h pr space to infinity h aaj tk maine to nhi suna ki space ke baare m kuch or jaankari di h. 5. If I'm god to mere rhte kisi ldki ki izzat nhi looti jati Lekin dharti pr hi 7 chiranjeevi ka claim krta h hindu dharma.....ky vo kbhi kisi ldki ko bachane ka nhi sochte....or agr vo nhi bacha skte h aake to ham Pooja kr hi kyu rhe h 😐 6. Or agr ek dharma shi or baki glt h fhirr to baki dharma vale nark me jayenge kyuki unhone kisi ek particular dharma meh bhagvano ka naam nhi liya. 7. Or jo ham khte h ki ham sbse purani Sanskriti h to bhai suno... Ye jo area h na indian ka vo fertile h sbse jada or hame geographically advantages h isliye yha pe sbse phli sabhyata bani sidhu ghati sabhyata lekin ky esssi time pr duniya meh koi or sabhyata rhti hi nhi hogi ky or agr Aisa nhi h to ab to dusri sabhataye bhi mil rhi h 😂🫶 8. Or sbse bdi baat Agr god h or usne hame banaya h to ky usse security ki jrurat h 🙂
@lsd-di1em3 ай бұрын
Your question seems so naive, but that's not your fault. Let me tell you that in Hindu scriptures, there is no mention of a single God. They primarily focus on the philosophy of life and how to live a better life. Unfortunately, 99% of people don't understand what Hinduism is truly about and criticize it just to seem cool, without actually knowing anything about it. The gods you're referring to, who supposedly can or cannot do certain things, are inherited from stories meant to convey morals and ethics to future generations. So don't try to be cool and make assumptions about anything without knowing it.
@Smbv-n6r2 ай бұрын
I am not atheist a Hindu but i respect your opinion and logical statement 😊
@hahajagjot5 ай бұрын
OSHO brought me here ❤
@lakhdeepsingh19832 ай бұрын
Who all noticed Super Commando Dhruv, Nagraj, Fighter Toads & Bhokal posters in the background?
@explorewithparshu5 ай бұрын
Religion is About belief and Dharm is about consciousness
@Aman-vh7nd5 ай бұрын
You are about confusion
@shadow_with-a_voice79365 ай бұрын
You are somewhat correct.
@parvesmaurya25545 ай бұрын
Religion is about Belief, Dharm is about consciousness, Deen(Arabic) is cosmos , Religiya(Russian) is snow, jong-gyo(Korean) is water. BC kitna low IQ sound tu Hota hai kuch Idea hai tujhe. Zhandu
@shashankshekhar15635 ай бұрын
Good❤
@greekgod19355 ай бұрын
Dharm literally means imaan or religion..
@manizuno3 күн бұрын
India k ek temple me Dinousr ka figure h..u can search
@kishankhanna105 ай бұрын
Pehli bat to tu dharm mat bola kar bhai Dharm Aur religion alag hai. Dharm is a sanskrit word which means rightful duty. Extremely different from religion.
@krkirankumar5734 ай бұрын
Well said.👌
@madix4872 ай бұрын
To idhar Sanskrit me baat ho rhi kya ? Tum apna sanskrit ka dictionary band karke normal hindi me utro jo locally communication me use hota hai
@Dadadadadadada4402 ай бұрын
Then why people say sanatan dharm or hindu dharm 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@AbhishekYadav-lw7eh5 ай бұрын
Dharm is different than religion. Dharam is a personal choice or life decisions of a individual for himself. Religion is the societal ideology.
@unknown9288 Жыл бұрын
Very well explained 👌🏼👍🏼👏🏼❤️😊
@awarenessworld404 ай бұрын
निश्चित रूप से मैं एक नास्तिक हूं और आपके द्वारा कही गई बातों से 100% सहमत हूं आपका धन्यवाद आपको जय भीम❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
@NashimSarkar-s1f5 ай бұрын
इतने सालों में पहली बार कोई ऐसा समझदार या समझदारी वाला वीडियो किसी ने बनाया है तो वह आप हैं थैंक यू सर बहुत बहुत धन्यवादआपका
@sajbalak2 жыл бұрын
Brilliant point 🤟🤟
@cauliflowerhead27352 жыл бұрын
True! Also just bcz YOU think something is ancient doesn't make it right.
@unknown-sb5bq5 ай бұрын
Yup it only makes it worse because it's naive
@AnkitRamariya5 ай бұрын
Dinosaur to fir bhi extinct ho gaye bhai. Baki janwar jo aj bhi jinda hai jaise ki penguin, kangaroo, giraffe, deep-sea angler fish etc etc kabhi kisi ki sawari ya avatar ya whatever they were called in other religion nahi bane.😅😅😂 jisne dharm banaya usko bas apne ass pas wale janwaro ki hi jankari thi bas. Usi avatar aur bhagwan bana dala chahe wo koi bhi religion ka ho.
@adityajha96655 ай бұрын
Tum ye kaise bol sakte ho ki yahi hi hua hoga , ye to wahi hua ki book ke pichhe se answer chhap liya aur fir usi ko kisi tarah apni vikrit buddhi se Lage bakhaan karne ..... Aise mein to Maan lo koi extinct ho gayi hob, agar wo hain , to tum booge ki aisa to koi jiv hai hi nhi ,Mai nhi maanta .... Ye bas self - created axioms pe chalne Wale log 😂 tumhe to aise jiv ka nam bhi isiliye pata hai ki ya to religious books ne describe Kiya ya fir culturally logon ne define Kiya ..... And 9 planets to tunhare Ghar ke aaju baaju hi honge .... Tumlog ko exam mein pass mein text book n hoti hai to 4 page ke syllabus mein haalat kharab ho jati hai. Jabki ham yahan baat kar rahe hain years of years ki books ki , pta nhi kitni preserved hain aur kitni nasht ho gayi hongi .. shruti hi bas bachi , kyunki wo guru- śiṣya paraṃparā se aayi hai .... Ab jaise āyurvedā mein bhi Jo main book hai wo bhi ṣruti praṃparā se aayi hai , isiliye bachi thi ..baad baaki uske jo helping books honge , jo independent sages ke honge , wo to n jane kab gum ho Gaye honge .....
@a.p84965 ай бұрын
84 लाख योनि का जिक्र हैं hindu धर्म में और सवारी उन्ही पशुओ की हैं जिनकी कोई खूबी या गुण संतुलन को बताता हों अधूरा ज्ञान जहर के समान होता हैं आपसे अनुरोध हैं की पहले पूरी जानकारी जुटा ले
@manojoy69135 ай бұрын
@@a.p8496 🤣 aapko pata bhi hai ki Earth me kitni tarah ke jeev hai?? Nahi pata to puch lo. Muh se hago mat ❌ kabhi 33 KOTIYE hote hai kabhi 84 KOTIYE 🤣 tumko to ye bhi nahi pata ki HEENDU shabd ek gali hai Jo parsi logo ne di thi. Warna dikha do ki Kahan likha hai HEENDU tumhare text me.
@a.p84965 ай бұрын
@@manojoy6913 फ्लैट earth की किताबें पड़ोगे तो यही होगा 😁 33 कोटि प्रकार होता हैं यानि देवताओं के 33 प्रकार नाम पता कर के आ पहले और 84 लाख योनि यानि अलग अलग प्राणी इस धरती पर रहते हैं या थे क्यूंकि काफी तो विलुप्त हों चुके हैं और काफी विलुप्त होने वाले हैं पता कुछ हैं नहीं चले आते हैं पता नहीं कहां कहा से 😁
@a.p84965 ай бұрын
@@manojoy6913 हिन्दू शब्द सिंधु शब्द से आया हैं यानि वो लोग जो गंगा (सिंधु ) नदी के किनारे बसे हैं जैसे पंजाब में रहने वालो को पंजाबी कहा जाता हैं। पहले पूरी जानकारी पता कर ले चपटी धरती की किताबें पड़ेगा तो 33% क्या 100% आरक्षण भी काम नहीं आएगा 😁
@aficionado29605 ай бұрын
"Mujhe esa lagata hai" this very statement itself says you are also on the platform of perceptions yet nothing can be said about anything all are playing on different layers of perceptions believing it to be true.
@Alex-oz5kn Жыл бұрын
I think you took your starting lines from the book "Sapiens" by Yuval Noah Harari.❤
@Ray61023h5 ай бұрын
I have one question to you like who created the big ban and the observable universe, if it was only bigban(no god) then why we can't measure more than 13.8~ billion year.
@ByteVerse5364 ай бұрын
you should have taken you physics class. While current science may not have all the answers about the universe and its origins, it's logical to believe that future advancements will continue to expand our understanding.
@childhoodindoctrination96612 жыл бұрын
Please do some collaborations with historians. In which you can talk about all these technicalities.
@kuchbhirakhlebhai6834Ай бұрын
Actually, no hate intended-let's have a healthy discussion. According to Sanatan Dharma, it is older than 1.98 billion years just in this Kalp. The Sanatan view states that the universe is 159 trillion years old. Additionally, since infinite universes have been destroyed before ours, technically Sanatan Dharma is infinitely old👍 also i liked your video😊❤
@the__creative__canvasАй бұрын
@@kuchbhirakhlebhai6834 could you please me even one authentic proof in support of your vehemently hyerbolic statement about the so called longevity of Sanatan , dear Sir , other than quoting futile words like मान्यता / अवधारणा/ आस्था/ धार्मिक भावनाएं इत्यादि इत्यादि ?
@kuchbhirakhlebhai6834Ай бұрын
@@the__creative__canvas The Vishnu Purana covers all the mentioned records. I aimed for a healthy conversation, but if you're unfamiliar with what that means, the tone you're using is counterproductive. Read vishnu puran or Also you can google it :: According to the Vishnu Purana, the universe's age is measured in kalpas, which are days of Brahma. A kalpa is 4.32 billion years, or one thousand mahayugas. Each kalpa is divided into 14 manvantara periods, which last 71 Yuga Cycles, or 306,720,000 years. Brahma's lifespan is 100 kalpas, or 311.04 trillion human years. During this time, the universe is created, destroyed, and recreated in a cycle called pralaya, or cataclysm. After Brahma dies, a new Brahma is born after 100 Brahma years, and the cycle repeats.
@SandeepKumar-qk7wl5 ай бұрын
110% right , but in murkho ko kaun समझाए😂
@prasenjitmushahary25075 ай бұрын
I m sorry but dharma means our duty…. Even animals also follow their duty or dharma, for us as human we have developed systems and have more power to think so our dharma is also updated but his gyaan on dharma is very limited. So dharma existed even before our human race.
@omshinde56534 ай бұрын
💯💯@@prasenjitmushahary2507
@AveragepoliticsEnjoyer4 ай бұрын
@@prasenjitmushahary2507No it didn't 90% of world doesn't follow dhrama and we are no better than animals but we think we are.
@anonymous_atheist123 ай бұрын
It could be true if there was an absolute meaning attached to it but it's just that nobody has a duty and we are just surviving in this world full of uncertainties. Give proof if you think you can prove me wrong @@prasenjitmushahary2507
@480383 ай бұрын
मूर्खता धर्म के साथ merge कर गई है इसलिए इसे अलग नही किया जा सकता इसे Pseudo थर्म कहा जा सकता है
@taramandal309122 күн бұрын
मैने बहुत पढा, फिर बहुत पढ कर Debbie किये, फिर ,तथाकथित धार्मिक लोगो पर प्रश्न भी किये . लेकिन इससे अंहकार ही प्रबल हुआ . कि मै कुछ विशेष जानता हुं, मै , कौन उतर मै मै कौन Answer !!!!!
@sefalibhakat1435 ай бұрын
There is no difference between an atheist and a theist..both of them are shooting arrows in the dark...I think agnostic is a choice of knowledgeable human
@abhaym.k49985 ай бұрын
Apki baat vikas sir ki trh hai 👍
@piyanshu8004 ай бұрын
Yes bro ! I'm proud to be a Agnostic Hindu 🚩
@Xi_Jinping_4 ай бұрын
Vikas sir also said that.👍🙏
@mr.brawnyofficial97533 ай бұрын
Ok then answer this doubt pls ! What if I say ancient people what they felt and believed thousands of years ago , they passed such info to generations thru’ idols and speeches or just memorisation , and later on when people got to know about writing and grammar they recorded those in physical form. As this is the crux of Rig Ved since its mentioned their that how people passed info gen to gen thru memorization technique ! Simply my Sanatan dharma is not just a moral and spiritual , its more scientific, mathematic and ayurvedic , than what todays knowledge u have or any other athiest have ! Hence kindly read them and then comment .. Don’t mock anything without proper knowledge ! I also defy such dhongs in sanatan .. but I respect my core religion as whole !
@AmitKumarAlphaX2 жыл бұрын
Awesome ❤️❤️❤️
@Namish-yv9mz4 ай бұрын
When someone says that the religion he or she is following is old or ancient based on archaeological and historical proofs, then certainly that person means that its origin lies in the human history. Those who have had a good education don't say that the universe created their religion or their religion is as old s the universe itself do they ? Some Abrahamics I have encountered claim that Judaism, Christianity and Islam are the oldest on Earth. Some KZbin channels claim that too. Despite that, everyone knows that the oldest Abrahamic religion is not more 2500 years old leave lakhs or millions or billions. Talking of eastern religions the age factor was never a thing be it Buddhism , Hinduism, Jainism, Shintoism, Daoism, Sikhism and many more. But many Hindus today call the Hindu religion as Sanatan but none of them knows a single thing about the Sanatan Dharm they are lauding. SO yeah this video is for them If you are categorically making this video for such keyboard warriors on the internet you should have stated that instead of generalizing it for every person and if you are pre-assuming that every religious person makes the same claims ... then this video and even this whole channel makes no sense
@politicsuncoiled84806 ай бұрын
We understand that Religion was made by Humans. But calling it "Khel" because some are making it a khel today cannot discredit the civilizational progress that has been achieved by Hindu philosophy. While other religions are tied to a book and a prophet, my religion accepts each thought process and it's progressive and adaptive. What protected it from numerous tyrants is its flexibility and resilience.
@vijayola75975 ай бұрын
caste system is the worst
@mukulmatami49375 ай бұрын
sir kya ye picche.. background me.. nagraj, capital dhruv hain..?😮
@rajvaibhavtripathi84 Жыл бұрын
It is said that Carl Sagan believed in Shiva and often mentioned the so called Nataraj form, as an Atheist, I find it a bit contradictory. Thoughts please?
@vimoh Жыл бұрын
That's not true. He didn't.
@bantaikolagelibhookh9 ай бұрын
in a poetic or metaphorical sense, he did
@NeKo191136 ай бұрын
You mean the script of his documentary on hinduism? 😶 Doesn't it make sense he's talking about things what hindu beleifs say since that's what the documentary is about?
@jeeetkr5 ай бұрын
@@NeKo19113उपनिवेशित व्यक्ति
@NeKo191135 ай бұрын
@@jeeetkr I don't speak sanskrit brudda... 😅 How bout you try again
@joswinnoronha17395 ай бұрын
The Bible's best description of a dinosaur-like animal is recorded in Job chapter 40. “Look at the behemoth, which I made along with you and which feeds on grass like an ox. What strength he has in his loins, what power in the muscles of his belly! His tail sways like a cedar; the sinews of his thighs are close-knit. His bones are tubes of bronze, his limbs like rods of iron. He ranks first among the works of God…” (Job 40:15-19).
@shoaibmondal5 ай бұрын
I could like you to talk with dr zakir khan or other scholers or just see some video if you think its only past thinks are written in Quran or else you should research on it because it's very big it has so many information in form of small small pieces you will be revealed truth and future also
@rrajputofficial50245 ай бұрын
If you are a Jakir nayek follower, may god bless you with wisdom.
@hindubhakti22014 ай бұрын
Bilkul sahi
@prasenjitmushahary25075 ай бұрын
I m sorry but your viewpoint about dharma is null and void….. this entire system was created by the god and dharma is the duty or Karm that god has has set for those who can Think and dharma existed even before human race….. Now for example one 2 year old child doesn’t have a capability to think rationally so they r not bound to follow the dharma but as he grow he will realise that he should follow the duty or dharma… dharma means duty… even animal follows their duty or dharma so how come u r claiming dharma is a new thing lol
@ByteVerse5364 ай бұрын
I understand your viewpoint, but as an atheist, I don't believe in a divine creator. Dharma, to me, seems more like a human construct shaped by cultural and societal norms over time rather than a preordained duty from a god. The notion that animals and young children follow dharma overlooks the complexity of behavior influenced by instinct and socialization.
@fazer79Ай бұрын
Do you mean a cow giving milk is performing her duties?😂😂😂 that's the most hilarious statement I have heard. We have reared those animals and we have used them for our purpose ex a bulls in farming. There is no such thing as dharma there. A cat stealing milk is no dharma😂😂😂. What were u smoking bro. I am gonna laugh for a while and will remember this statement for years to come.😂
@afzalkhanpathan3515 ай бұрын
Nowadays... If there is book to be written about morality then it should basically condemn the unwanted beliefs and also worship of every and anything considered as almight...... it should rather promote the tradition and culture.... this would be more humanitarian than spreading hatred among people with power-politics and social media....
@HanumanChoudhary-c7q5 ай бұрын
रिलिजन और धर्म दोनों अलग-अलग चीज है मैं किसी साधु के पास गया. मेरी कुछ समस्याएं थी जो मैंने उनको बताई, तो उन्होंने मुझे कुछ उपाय बताएं, उन्होंने कहा कि आप से जितना बन पड़े उतना चुग्गा (अनाज दाना ) पक्षियों के चबूतरे पर बिखेर देना. ये धर्म का काम है,
@artyWeeb3 ай бұрын
Sir u need editor that will make your vido more engaging for more mass. Your content is absolutely fantastic
@biswajitnath8046 ай бұрын
Did dinosaurs have religion? I wonder
@RavishKhare15 күн бұрын
Not making sense. Basically, ancient-medieval-modern are timelines constructed in the human timeframe since cultures arose, say approximately about 5000 years ago upto now. Within this period, but much later, religions or belief-systems arose. Before this period is called pre-historic. We can call this classification as human timeline. Then we have the geological timeline of about 5 billion years of the existence of earth. Hadean-Archean-Proterozoic-Phanerozoic. Then we have the cosmic timeline of about 13 billion years of the known universe. You can't mix all of these and make a nonsense out of it.
@Neuraltrades5 ай бұрын
Sor there's some value i would like to add. Here are some points that i would discuss since i have read various philosophic scriptures and philosophies. 1. WORLD - When scriptures says about the world then it doesn't mean the physical reality totally instead what it implies is the world in form of preception. Humans don't see world as merely objects but as function or as an role. 2. Values and end of civilization - When the religion says that rejecting values will be the end of humanity , what they means is that if humans rejects a way of life in a specefic environment they might be prone to self destruction. Now some values are completely specefic to an environment but the philosophy of religion survives because it provides a broader approach. However majority does not understand at all in a conscious sense. 3.Existence of religion - When we talk about absence of religion in animals , we automatically declare that humans are animals . If it was to be true then no science would've been possible at all . My point here is that naturally their is a heirarchy in animals ,but when it comes to humans the needs of humans for hierarchy evolves because we are not as same as animals and we need a structure that provides certain code of conduct that ensures our max probability of survival and also provides a philosophic field.
@ShubhammishraShubhammish-sf4qr4 ай бұрын
Jo sach me bhagwan ko manta hai uske liye dhram koi maine nhi rkhta
@gabriel.notfound5 ай бұрын
Even as a Christian, the argument you listed is stupid. "Parampara" is not a valid argument at all. We should only believe in something, if it is factual and logical.
@SajanKumar-rn3wo8 ай бұрын
good job vimoh Sir
@eatright131Ай бұрын
All so called Yug are of many Lakhs years , almost 43 + lakhs 😮 Who calculated them ?!?
@cacavb7 ай бұрын
Best explanation
@corporateclown3585 ай бұрын
@vimoh, On your point on that none of the religions think or are concerned about the future, what would your take be on Buddha's objective to remove all suffering for mankind (which can only be done in the future) ? Will this point towards a different, futuristic religion which sways away from the Abrahamic and Hindu religions.
@rajvaibhavtripathi84 Жыл бұрын
Those who follow Sanatana, often say that it liberates us by providing us the concept of 'धार्यो इति धर्म:' loosely translated as what you bring into practice is your true religion. Can you please give your opinion?
@NeKo191136 ай бұрын
If what you bring into practice is considered religion, then along with period of advaita or other schools of philosophy... There also have been period of sati, caste system.... Funny thing is, people would gladly claim adi sankar's practice being hindu- but would break their sweat in trying to lay out how sati was instead voluntary, caste system was british... That's just called cherry picking.
@rafeeqkhan62685 ай бұрын
Sanatana tantanaka thanathana pling Bing booom 😂😂
@utkarshninawe975 ай бұрын
@@rafeeqkhan6268 aa gya katua
@AashishChansoria5 ай бұрын
@@NeKo19113 Since ancient times Hindu Faith does have an evolutionary and flexible nature. "Dharyate Iti Dharma" - Dharm ko Dharan kara jata hain. The meaning of Dharm is not religion as per shastras. Religion is a modern connotation used for it. I won't be speaking for a whole community but as much I've read - Dharm wahi hain jo Samay, Paristhithi aur Kaal ke hisab se badal jaye. I'll try to explain it in detail. Homo Sapiens evolved around 25 lakh years ago. Around 70,000 years ago the use of language was developed. Neolithic revolution took place around 10,000 years ago. And then around 2000 BCE Philosophy is said to be traced in the Indian Subcontinent. Around 6th Century for the Western part of the world. (Thales) It is said that philosophy is the mother of all sciences and disciplines. And the origins of modern Hindu faith can be traced back to the Vedic or Pre Vedic Age (1500 BCE) THIS WAS THE FIRST PHASE OF INDIC PHILOSOPHY. From their evolved the Age of Upanishads - from where almost all modern Hindu beliefs can be traced. Then happened the development of the 9 Indic Schools of Philosophy. Out of which 6 were Orthodox and 3 were Hetrodox. (here atheism means that they did not believed in the Vedas as supreme authority) Then the advent of Islam and further evolution of the Vedic tradition in the form of Advait Vedant, Dwaitvad, Sikhism. Then happened the Renaissance : around 19th Century to take a stand against the foreign religions, all these sects which were divided but had common roots were merged into one umbrella which Paul Hacker called Neo Hinduism/ Neo Vedanta. Which is modern day Hinduism. Then the struggle for equality (Arya Samaj, Brahm Samaj, Swami Vivekanand ji, Navyana Buddhism) So I don't see a rigid, non changable, non questionable religion here. This is a tradition of Debates, Proofs and Criticism of what's outdated and not required. Dharm wo hain jo Samay, Paristhithi aur Kaal ke hisab se badal jaye. But if you'll compare it with the age of universe, it actually is modern in that sense. But as history and philosophy is concerned it is ancient. And yes i believe we as the descendants of such great ancestors should carry forward their legacy of debate, criticism, logic, with merging all information and tools present to us.
@a.p84965 ай бұрын
@@rafeeqkhan6268 k2वा 😁😁
@viplabthakur306Ай бұрын
Questions like this make want to be 'The Watcher' from 'What if' series.
@legalcorner65985 ай бұрын
Atheism has turned out to be a new religion
@Gamer-ik7gk4 ай бұрын
Religion ki definition bata pehle
@SUREETBHATTACHARYA5 ай бұрын
There are two timelines. One is historical and scientific, other is based on mythology. Both are true on their own right. Nobody knows the ultimate truth. So I am at peace with both.
@Ambuj_Patel5 ай бұрын
let me clear, dharm is not about bjp, it is only about Self knowledge i.e. also called spirituality and nothing else
@funjoyp3 ай бұрын
Logical guru Sadguru kahete hain Shiva dusre planet ke vasi hain to dharm to udhar bhi hoga … cosmic calendar banaya ki Prithvi ka calendar? Hum pure universe ka theka itne confidence se nahi le shakte!
@karansarin19865 ай бұрын
Vimoh jisse aap dharma kehte hain wo panth hai, Dharma toh kuch aur hi hota hai.
@adhyatmiktvv5 ай бұрын
Bhai aise logo ki yahi to dikkat h. Apne hisab se agenda set kr lete hai.
@adhyatmiktvv5 ай бұрын
Bhai aise logo ki yahi to dikkat h. Apne hisab se agenda set kr lete hai.
@Intoxicated_Virus5 ай бұрын
The Bible talks about future.
@gaurav96075 ай бұрын
But don't know about past 😂😂😂
@Intoxicated_Virus5 ай бұрын
@@gaurav9607 it speaks about past, present and the future✌🏽
@jeeetkr5 ай бұрын
@@Intoxicated_Virusफिर इसे साबित करो
@Intoxicated_Virus5 ай бұрын
@@jeeetkr Sure brother. Bible mein book of Genesis talk about creation. Throughout old testament, The Bible talks about the coming of Messaih. It came to pass in the form of Jesus Christ. New testament mein Revelation talks about the last days of mankind. You can read the Bible, it is the living word of God. God will surely help you in understanding.
@joswinnoronha17395 ай бұрын
The Bible's best description of a dinosaur-like animal is recorded in Job chapter 40. “Look at the behemoth, which I made along with you and which feeds on grass like an ox. What strength he has in his loins, what power in the muscles of his belly! His tail sways like a cedar; the sinews of his thighs are close-knit. His bones are tubes of bronze, his limbs like rods of iron. He ranks first among the works of God…” (Job 40:15-19).
@rinkuverma36884 ай бұрын
lekin ak aisi bhi book jo is dharti ka past persent or future tino batati hai
@I__AM__AI5 ай бұрын
i would suggest please do a collab podcast interview anything with achary prashant
@devasharma54785 ай бұрын
acharya will not agree😅
@sanjayroy2193 ай бұрын
Sir please tell do consciousness remain after death. If it exists than both energy and matter cant be created or destroyed.
@champcricket65765 ай бұрын
Nastiko ke paas bhoot pret aur punarjanm jaisi ghatnao ka koi explanation nhi hai aur chale hai bhagwan par sawal uthaane ko. University of Virginia ne already punarjanm per research kar rakhi hai , jabki uss desh ka dharm punarjanm ko nhi maanta tha lekin jo satya wo saamne aa hi jaata hai. Aankh band kar rakhi hai to isme aapki galti hai.
@imaginedragons16623 ай бұрын
Bhoot preth sirf brain mai hote hai real Mai nhi. Or jitni bhi tuune ghatnae dekhi hai internet per wo VFX ya movies ke scene hote hai, simple explanation hai
@RealGamerVishu4 ай бұрын
Sometimes atheist follows atheism like religion, they want to prove everything in their own way.. it's not simple like some bingobango theory. They follows evolution theory like Bible or kuran.
@ConvergingHorizons Жыл бұрын
Good video sir.
@harshsrivastav21975 ай бұрын
I would urge you to really read these religious scriptures, particularly vedantic. These generally tackle humanity's day to day struggle with himself. Getting to know who he really is. This is actually the true purpose of religion, if anyone says anything else, then he's throwing away the true essence of religion.
@Temp-j2x3 ай бұрын
Some questions for Atheist which they can't answer. How universe come from nothing ?. Why we still can't understand quantum particle behaviour ?.
@sandeepsuman85482 ай бұрын
We have limited idea about this universe , and we are still finding about that The most scientific consensus is that big bang is the point where the universe start because we have lot of evidence about that What you are trynna say is simple god of the gaps argument So your questions's answer is we don't know right now But how you can insert god in this ??? bcoz there is zero evidence that god exist By this logic one can say universe is started by pokemons
@madix4872 ай бұрын
@@sandeepsuman8548leave it . He just parroting questions.
@spuriusscapula48292 ай бұрын
Does trying to saying "I don't know" or "we don't know yet" make you gag?
@rajeevjaiswal19555 ай бұрын
Wrong. Not only about past, Dharm talks about past, present and future altogether. Even for future, there have been so many predictions... Like cyclic tendencies of humanity with age in form of yugas. So many gurus telling about future consequences of actions. Those are the main thing of Dharma, as those not believing in God or morality often look for short sighted pleasure and hence destroy themselves through drugs and environment by blatantly killing animals for selfish desires.
@Neosanyaasiosho5 ай бұрын
Agar saab jante the toh 1000 saal gulam q bane 😂😂
@rajeevjaiswal19555 ай бұрын
@@Neosanyaasiosho Sab nhi jante the, aur sab gulaami nhi kiye the, rishi wagerah log jungalo aur naa a baba log samshaan me rehte the.
@BiologicArrow45 ай бұрын
@@rajeevjaiswal1955to ese to me bata ta hu ki agle 200-300 sal ke andar temperature bohot badhega, glacier pighal rahe he, aur age logo ko khana nahi mile ga, aur me ye bhi bhavishya vani kar raha hu ki ek bohot bada earthquake agega, jisee lakho log marenge, le ho gaya ab 300 sal bad log mujhe mahan manenge
@rajeevjaiswal19555 ай бұрын
@@BiologicArrow4 exact year bhi bata do, aur kuch extra details, bhi agar sahi ho gya to vakai mahaan manenge log tumhe... Warna fraud kehlaoge.
@rajeevjaiswal19555 ай бұрын
@@BiologicArrow4 Bahut log aaye aur predict kar ke gye sabko same respect nhi mila, yaha tak ki nostradamus ke bhi kuch predictions to wrong huye hi hai.
@rehanakhtar23255 ай бұрын
Jab qabar se bahar nikloge to aisa lagega jaise subah soya r shaam ko utha.
@TheShanu334 ай бұрын
Its nice to see KZbinrs like you now days ❤❤❤ Keep up the good work sir😊
@prateekrajput71305 ай бұрын
Grantho mei 84 lakh yoniya likhi hai kya kisi granth mei total 84 lakh janwaro ka naam likhna sambhav hai indian continent mei paye jane wale kai jeevo ka naam nhi lika gya hai iska matlab logo ko uske bare mei pta nhi tha purani theory ka 100 percent true nhi mana ja sakta kyo ki pahle mana jata tha ki manav mansahari tha lekin ab sodh mei mei pta chala hai ki manaV VEGAN BHI THE THEORIES BADATI RAHTI HAI
@vinodb37965 ай бұрын
In Hanppi..vithal temple carving bani he dinosaur ki before thousands of years..should check
@MahipalSinghKatheriaSaral5 күн бұрын
Vimoh you are great. Your thoughts are great.
@vlogsoon91813 ай бұрын
Dinosaur hindu थे saarr😭😭
@aryabartarout56973 ай бұрын
Dino asur
@ShantanuMishra-nq1wg2 ай бұрын
@@aryabartarout5697😂😂😂😂
@neovask4 ай бұрын
अंग्रेज़ी के शब्दों का हिंदी अनुवाद आसानी से किया जा सकता है। तो फिर क्यों नहीं किया जा रहा? कौनसी और कैसी मानसिकता काम कर रही है यहां? इस विषय पर विश्लेषण दिलचस्प रहेगा। English words can be translated into Hindi easily. Then why is it not being done? What kind of mentality is working here? It would be interesting to analyze this topic.
@akashdev33426 ай бұрын
Dharm is not religion. Dharm means believing in truth. There's only one dharm for entire mankind but many religions. Religion means believing in some particular things. There's only one dharm that is "life is suffering and all we do is to reduce that suffering." All we do in name of religion or otherwise is to reduce that suffering be it playing a game or going to temple. In reality that suffering can't be removed. That suffering is what that lead to many inventions and all. Which brings humanity to a place where we are today.
@ARVINDKUMAR-gh5do5 ай бұрын
Truth ko believe karna bewakoof ka kam h wiser man only tested and proven then accept
@akashdev33425 ай бұрын
@@ARVINDKUMAR-gh5do What I said as truth is something tested and proven throughout history.
@ARVINDKUMAR-gh5do5 ай бұрын
@@akashdev3342 what? God was proved. What are you talking to rubbish god is a blunder false in this world 🌎
@akashdev33425 ай бұрын
@@ARVINDKUMAR-gh5do First of all what you have said don't make any sense to me. Secondly I haven't used the word god anywhere in my comment.
@guripawar18975 ай бұрын
@ghost27611😂😂😂😂😂😂
@KaushalN9Ай бұрын
sanatan dharm future ki baat karta hai. kalki ka avatar ki yug ke ant ki future me log kaise honge , body structure kaise hoga, earth kaise hoga everything in written in kalki puran 🤷♂
@ApoorvSaurabh7 ай бұрын
Vimoh, Hindi or Sanskrit word ‘dharm’ & English word ‘religion’ aren’t exactly similar. Your views, please
@lazycoder58726 ай бұрын
Kita v hath per marlo , both are same
@ApoorvSaurabh6 ай бұрын
In today’s context yes, but I m talking about the literal translation @@lazycoder5872
@SameersQuestForGod86 ай бұрын
Both are same in terms of literal meaning also. Dogmatic people do this all the time and we call it “Linguistic Gymnastics” 🤣
@ApoorvSaurabh6 ай бұрын
@@SameersQuestForGod8 dharma is righteousness & religion doesn’t even have a Hindi equivalen, You might have understood me if you’d have read even a little bit of philosophy
@ApoorvSaurabh6 ай бұрын
@@lazycoder5872 dharma is righteousness, religion doesn’t have a Hindi equivalent Read a little bit of philosophy please
@aloysiusdiaz72753 ай бұрын
This is called sensible talk.
@ManickdeepMasih5 ай бұрын
अगर आप यह कहना चाहते हैं कि आप के पूर्वज बन्दर थे, तो यह आप की समस्या है। हमारे पूर्वज तो मनुष्य ही थे , हमे इस मे ज़रा भी संदेह नहीं है।
@netfreak44985 ай бұрын
Sahi kahaa aaj ke naastik log khud ko rocket science ka baap samajhta hai.
@theuntouchables62145 ай бұрын
ये आप के एकेले का इतिहास हो सकता है , सभी मानव जाती का नाही।
@vidyabhushan87472 ай бұрын
🤣🤣 अंधभक्त
@faisalsaifi80764 ай бұрын
He is right guys. Even he got born (don’t know how without created) on January 2nd and the proof of that is the white hairs he has. Absolute genius.
@punjab-np9mc5 ай бұрын
भगवान मात्र एक कल्पना हैं।। अगर हैं तो नामर्द ईश्वर सामने आकर अपने आप के होने का सबूत क्यू नहीं देता इन धार्मिक लोगों को।।
@ravipandey66915 ай бұрын
You don't know the definition of dharam I guess ,you being to logical ultimately becoming illogical becoz you can't understand it. Just my thoughts.
@SumitKumar-yj7ek5 ай бұрын
Just your thought. If human in insufficient to understand what religion and superior energy is, then how you guys know there's something like God?
@AK47-6662 жыл бұрын
The example of dharmic people you are giving in this video are those ignorant fools and corrupt souls who have twisted their dharm into their agenda. And seems to be ignorant themselves
@vimoh2 жыл бұрын
I am afraid that is a logical fallacy known as No True Scotsman. The system is faulty. people are good. They act in bad ways because the system (religion in this case) is bad.
@vimoh2 жыл бұрын
The reason many who go through a bad system and still don't become bad is because their inherent goodness prevents them from taking bad systems seriously.
@SouravBanik905 ай бұрын
I completely agree and I am not an atheist. I see my beliefs as not “what was” but “what is”. I don’t think of “what will be” first ne personally. But I think whether I can work to make things better for everyone. My belief in something that gives me peace is not so fickle that someone else not believing in the same thing as me warrants an aggression from me.