The True Story of John Hunyadi | Rise of the Raven

[@katalinkozak9869]

He is a key figure of the Hungarian history and that of the wider region. He was an excellent strategist and diplomat, who became nevetheless also the largest landowner of Hungary. There is a new international TV show just presented in October in Cannes called the Rise of the Raven , we expect it to be available to watch from Spring 2025. The creators were very thoughtfull in trying to present the era including the various languages spoken by characters as documentaristic as possible. We will see how they managed soon, the trailer looks impressive.

[@historyprofiles]

Thank you so much for watching!! I hope you enjoyed the video! I can't wait for the show to come out!

[@guycalabrese4040]

I just watched the trailer The fighting scenes looked very "Hollywood" (not realistic) with the "heroes" fighting in full armour but without helmet and with perfect hair in the midst of battle... You can leave most of your armour at home, but never your helmet. Even the lowest peasants had some kind of head protection.

[@katalinkozak9869]

@@guycalabrese4040 not sure if that was the case in Central Eastern Europe and Balkans for those who were not mercenaries, but simple serfs from Balkans. Please note, these campaigns were multiethnic from armour to weapons used varied based on the region. It will be easier to validate when you see which battle is depicted- Belgrade, Varna etc etc.

[@jozsefsandor671]

@@katalinkozak9869 Total wrong.

[@katalinkozak9869]

@@jozsefsandor671 what is wrong?

[@DreadPirateRobertz]

Those Hungarian castles are incredible.

[@nannunbgd]

Hungarian in you brain!

[@tamaszlav]

No me speaky English? ​@@nannunbgd

[@rod8685]

​@@nannunbgd Learn history before talk nonsense.

[@almeu433]

Made by German or Italian stone masons

[@iblendallday]

Without Hungary Romanians wouldve still found themselves in the middle ages,also 20-30% of their words have an hunic root,words like Muncă and Puşcă

[@aranykert]

I am sorry, he was not English, so his name was János Hunyadi! To be more precise, Hunyadi János. For us Hungarians, the family is first! :))

[@incosy]

Ugye tisztában vagy vele, hogy mi is a saját nyelvünkre fordítjuk szinte az összes történelmi személy nevét? Felesleges kötekedned.

[@georgianaflorea865]

Very well researched video. As a Romanian, thank you. His castle is intact, beautiful and can be visited. I am looking foreward for the video on his son, Matei

[@85szabolcs]

You do realize that he was not a Romanian and that he definitely not consider himself one?

[@albertenriquecrowleybeastc217]

I'm just very thankful for all the border land Christian nations, Hungary and Romania kept their freedom and their faith, and fought for truth and justice before it became fashionable to do so.

[@historyprofiles]

Thank you so much for watching! I hope you enjoyed the video! I may have to make a video on his son!

[@andreasbalamuc2103]

@@85szabolcs u realize that he was half Romanian,and he didn`t said that because we where consider peasants by some mongols thats why!! ;) ohh and matia was made with a Romanian woman that changed her name!!!

[@tamastorok6066]

@@andreasbalamuc2103 u delulu but okay

[@ElkeMB]

Sorry i am late History Profiles, but very amazed with this great video. Thank you so much, listening now on my evening

[@historyprofiles]

Thank you so much for watching ELKE! I hope you enjoyed the video!

[@ElkeMB]

@historyprofiles You're welcome Ollie. Thank you, i really enjoyed it and rewatched it!

[@historyprofiles]

@ thank you Elke! Hunyadi really was quite a man!

[@ElkeMB]

@@historyprofiles He was indeed! I really loved this history too, as much. Thank you Ollie, i hope you get the ads also! 👍

[@-RONNIE]

Thank you for the video I've heard of him before but I learned something new today as well.

[@historyprofiles]

Thank you so much for watching! He really was quite a man!

[@-RONNIE]

@historyprofiles enjoy the rest of your week

[@TihetrisWeathersby]

John Hunyadi is the greatest man that ever lived

[@historyprofiles]

Thank you so much for watching! He was the ultimate man for sure utterly epic

[@alexeidragunov4534]

@@historyprofileshe was Epic but i would say regionally , Vlad the Impaler , Stephan The Great and Michael the Brave did a lot more

[@Syrenia1552]

@@alexeidragunov4534 Vlad, Stephan and Michael defended Nándorfehérvár? What stopped the Turks on their way to Europe for seventy years? Or was it Hunyadi?

[@alexeidragunov4534]

@ Hapsburgs, Venice, Constantinopole, Timur and the Timurids , other turkic tribes , mamluks , Genoa , The Pope sometimes

[@Ταργιτάος1]

@@alexeidragunov4534 Only you Romanians believe this nonsense, who have been manipulated to the core by the Ceausist historians, and by Sergiu Nicolaescu's phantasmagorical films, in which not even 20% is true! On the contrary, the truth is that they didn't hear much about these Romanian voivodes in the West, nor in the East, and not even until today, because all their victories, which were not that many, were magnified by the Ceausist and communist historians, since, for example, Stefan and Vald fought each other many times and did not so much with the Turks!

[@andraspeter1114]

One of the great unsung heroes of the middle ages. His story definitely warrants a Hollywood blockbuster, but that will never happen

[@vodkasharkeez]

Not unsung m.kzbin.info/www/bejne/b5nYmZSGZc-ke68&pp=ygUhamVzdGUgbGkgdmlkamVsaSBtb2dhIHNpbmthIGphbmth

[@larrymutuma3332]

There's a series about him coming out next year, Rise of the raven

[@johnbuxton4484]

Just the video I needed before I visit Romania later this evening, thank you!

[@historyprofiles]

@@johnbuxton4484 hope you enjoy the video!!!

[@katalinkozak9869]

The castle is in Transylvania, the picture of the video are not showing his castle in Hunyad.

[@johnbuxton4484]

@katalinkozak9869 thank you for the correction 👍

[@Agapy8888]

Thanks Ollie. Amazing

[@historyprofiles]

Thank you so much for watching!! I hope you enjoyed the video!

[@ChristopherBowly]

Excellent documentary. Very many thanks

[@historyprofiles]

@@ChristopherBowly thank you so much for watching!! I hope you enjoyed!!

[@carrioncrow7687]

I'm a bit late for the history lesson, but Hunyadi sounds like an intriguing figure

[@historyprofiles]

Thank you so much for watching! I hope you enjoyed the video!

[@thewolf1630]

As always, brother, great hearing from you and keep on bringing the great content 🤙🏾 ✊🏽

[@historyprofiles]

Thank you so much for watching!! I hope you enjoyed the video brother! Have a great day!

[@danielsantiagourtado3430]

Thanks For this! Love your content ❤❤❤❤

[@historyprofiles]

Thank you so much for watching!!

[@mktf5582]

This is His/Her Story, that is now becoming your iconic phrase (so many youtubers have their iconic phrase)

[@historyprofiles]

I hope you enjoyed the video! haha yes, it is becoming my phrase!

[@danielsantiagourtado3430]

Please consider doing videos on the Habsburgs! Your format is great

[@jayterry8551]

Their family tree is more of a grape vine.

[@tanjiro2507]

​@@jayterry8551so true 😂

[@historyprofiles]

Thank you so much! & Thank you for watching! Any suggestions?

[@davefekete7187]

Janos Hunyadi the Hungarian Savior! We have paintings and statues of him and the beautiful Hungarian castle in modern day romania.

[@historyprofiles]

Thank you so much for watching! I hope you enjoyed the video! I cant wait to visit Hungaria one day!

[@davefekete7187]

@ Yes great video

[@almeu433]

He was Romanian 100%

[@istvansovari4208]

@@almeu433 Ha-ha-ha!!!! Tényleg ennyire ostobák vagytok??

[@DukeOfTheYard]

​@@almeu433Ethnically, perhaps. Culturally no.

[@felixmorris9329]

Thank you for this. Have you ever thought of making a coop with Schwerpunkt? His Medieval Hungarian history and warfare content is amazing

[@silliaek]

Thank you for not filling your video with junk ai Images

[@historyprofiles]

Thank you so much for watching! I hope you enjoyed the video!

[@jackiec.barnes9567]

Never heard of this guy, but I'm glad I watched your video. Great fuc**** historical video

[@historyprofiles]

@@jackiec.barnes9567 thank you so much! Glad you enjoyed!!

[@Adrian-PetruMunteanu-rf7er]

❤ and respect from Romania

[@latakicsi2183]

his grandchildren dnas was analyzed he is from serb side of banat in some degree so your anthem is a big fat lie about him you dont have history so try hijacking heros from here and there

[@attilakovacs1415]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/hYXMdnSZi8-brtU

[@attilakovacs1415]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/mJbao6B-aJWnmM0

[@Verebazs]

2:05 NO. There were no "Romanian nobles" in medieval Transylvania. First of all, because "Romania" did not exist, and would not exist for another 400 years, and thus neither did a Romanian noble class. Second, Transylvania was an autonomus region of Hungary, and thus any noble of the region was a Hungarian noble, regardless of their ethnic background. Third, while we have little information about Hunyadi's father, we know for a fact, his mother was in fact a Hungarian lady, by the name Morzsinai Erzsébet.

[@tomip.6661]

One of the greatest hungarian

[@cllaudiusd521]

Maybe romanian. See international historiography , not hungarian propaganda.

[@ORTHODOXCRUSADEEDITS]

​@@cllaudiusd521Is romanian cause he was borned in Transilvania

[@istvansovari4208]

@@cllaudiusd521 Román Propaganda!!!! Nemzetközi történetírás? Rendben! Mutass csak 1!!!!! korabeli írást,amelyik nem MAGYARNAK írja.NINCSEN!!!

[@istvansovari4208]

@@ORTHODOXCRUSADEEDITS Ha-ha-ha!!!!

[@ORTHODOXCRUSADEEDITS]

@@istvansovari4208?

[@Syrenia1552]

The video is very good, despite a few minor inaccuracies, but you can't show a life journey like this in 30-40 minutes in all its detail. If you don't mind, a few additions: 1. the Vlachs (Romanians) are Orthodox, and Hunyadi was a devout Catholic. For that reason alone, he could not have been of Vlach origin. 2. Belgrade was then part of Hungary and was called Nándorfehérvár, so the siege of Belgrade is a misnomer. 3. the siege of 1456 should definitely mention John Capistrano and his crusading army. They played a decisive role in winning the final battle. 4 Pope Callixtus III ordered that the siege be bell-ringed three times a day for the success of the siege. This is the origin of the noon chime, which is still rung every day in churches to commemorate the triumph of Nándorfehérvár. (For Catholics: the change of colour of the Lord Jesus on 6 August, which is still celebrated in the Catholic Church, was also ordered by the Pope to commemorate this victory. The date of 6 August is the day on which news of the victory reached Rome).

[@Irish16King]

Amazing so interesting well done

[@historyprofiles]

Thank you so much for watching!! I hope you enjoyed the video!

[@AvsegnoGrisiewky]

"Turk-Buster"!! The man ate Turks for breakfast with a sprinkling of blood

[@Rebecca-d7b]

I have turkey every thanksgiving

[@historyprofiles]

Turk Buster, The White Knight, what cool nicknames to have. Thank you so much for watching!! I hope you enjoyed the video!

[@Zoltan07]

Hunyadi János 🇭🇺🏰⚔️🗡🛡 was a great man.

[@Steven-nv7ho]

My favorite faction in Medieval 2 total war

[@historyprofiles]

Thank you so much for watching!! I hope you enjoyed the video!

[@zoltanperei4789]

Hunyadi János's father had the same name as Hungary's first king: Vajk. Makes you wonder how romanian was he then.

[@Ταργιτάος1]

But the reality is that there is no contemporary data that "Woyk", whom King Sigismund rewarded with Hunyad Castle, was really the father of Hunyadi János, because these were all much later references that were falsified even in the last century! But what we know for sure is that Hunyadi's father was already a Catholic noble, because in the Hungarian kingdom only Catholic nobles could receive lands and estates, laws stipulated this! Or why did Hunyadi János or his son King Matthias, never say that their ancestors came from Wallachia? Because in all contemporary data, he and his entire family considered themselves Hungarian Catholic nobles! In fact, he never went to Wallachia to visit his birthplace, because no one can name what kind of settlement it is, and that's only because there isn't one! Many people refer to Thuróczy János and Antonio Bonfini when discussing Romanian ancestry when want to prove it, but in fact these chroniclers did not write anything specific and wrote their works many decades after Hunyadi János death! Thuróczy claims that "nobili et claro Transalpinae gentis de gremio natus erat", and they refer to this as meaning that he comes from a noble and notable family from Transalpina, and that Zsigmond brought his father from there to his own country. But these falsifiers of history never say that Thuróczy then adds: ‟‟fertur‟‟ that is, they just say it like that, so this means that it is a rumor, he does not know from a reliable source! On the contrary, all such forgers are now deeply silent about the fact that since then the certificate of King László V., under whom Hunyadi János served the most, has been found, and in this certificate he writes the following about Hunyadi: "Joannes, filius Vajvode de Verebel." And this is also very interesting, because no one disputes that in the certificates "Petrus, filius Georgii de Vereb" or "Petrus Vajvode de Verebel" was the Hungarian voivode Péter Verebélyi of Transylvania! And who became the voivode of Transylvania ten years later, but Hunyadi János?! Historians are silent about the fact that this Verebélyi family also has the raven in its coat of arms, and it looks like only these two great noble families in Hungary at that time had the raven in their coat of arms! For the Verebély family, the raven - holló was by all accounts a reference to their origin, as it also turned out that there was a settlement called Hollós, which was their property and where a Hollósvár built by their ancestors could have existed! Because those who don't know Hungarian don't even know that the name of the raven is holló in Hungarian, and that's how this settlement and the castle were called! According to contemporary data, King Sigismund donated this settlement together with Kikinda to Hagymás László the lord of Bánság, and later Hagymás sold it to Hunyadi. Isn't it logical that Hunyadi János bought the settlement where his ancestors came from?! And then here comes the very interesting thing, that no one thought that the Italian chronicler of King Matthias, Antonio Bonfini, took this name "Corvinus" from the name of the Hungarian settlement Hollós, because the name of the raven is corvus in Latin, but also corvinus in the time of the Romans was written, from which Bonfini also derived a fictitious Roman origin. But this had nothing to do with the Romanians at that time, since at that time the Vlachs had not even invented their Roman origins, let alone their Daco-Roman origin! And now the most likely data that Bonfini could have taken from Mátyás is when he writes: "Matthias Corvin, born to the father of Hunyadi Hollós János, took the first of his first names from Hunyad Castle, located in the farthest part of Transylvania, and the other from the village in which he born." And here, Bonfini was probably referring to the paternal ancestors of King Mátyás, but some people deliberately misinterpreted his writing, because our academic historians explain this as Bonfini must have been wrong here as well, since Mátyás was born in Kolozsvár - Cluj, but here it is not about Mátyás and not even about Hunyadi János, but probably about his father! No matter how we take it, Antonio Bonfini clearly describes that Mátyás took his second first name, Corvin, or Hollós in Hungarian, from the village, i.e. Hollós, from which his ancestors came! According to the unmistakable words of King László V's often mentioned 1453 certificate, Hunyadi's ancestors had the right to use a coat of arms thanks to the grace of the Hungarian kings! So this also strongly proves that they could not use their coat of arms starting with their father, but for much longer, probably for many centuries, which completely contradicts the fact that Hunyadi's father was Woyk! However, we do not know of the Woyk's family that they used any kind of coat of arms, at least no description of this has yet been found, so it is quite possible that they were really Cumans or Vlachs from Wallachia, who then disappeared in the storm of history, and may have been taken their property by Hunyadi János, and this is where the confusion comes from later! Because it is certain that already in the first half of the 15th century, Hunyadi became the owner of the entire county of Hunyad, which is already mentioned as Huniad in the 1256 papal charter! And the town and the earthen castle where the castle of the Hunyadis was later built, was mentioned as Hungnod and Huniad. And this is certainly a name with an ancient Hungarian meaning, which was already written down from the 13th century, but it is probably much older! And I am writing this only because the Romanians also falsified the origin of this name, because they say that it has always been Hunedoara, but it is certain that this did not mean anything in Romanian either, and the first Vlachs renamed this county and castle in their own language in a mirror translation! Anyway, it is now a genetically proven fact that the Hunyadi family could not have come from the Romanians, because they were able to take very good quality samples from the bones of King Matthias' son János Corvin and his minor child found in Lepoglava, Croatia!

[@michelleg7]

Really sad how he died and just being a really good tactician and having so many victories, then boom dies by disease. That blows 😖

[@mktf5582]

Sir Sidney Smith - Guillermo Miller (Latin American Wars of independence), please do them.

[@catalindale7296]

I'm from Romania and he a legend to my people

[@historyprofiles]

I hope you enjoyed the video! He is indeed a legend!

[@jozsinagy9833]

Really? He was betrayed by the Romanians in every battle, and even taken prisoner after the defeat in Varna. (Vlad Tepes) If Hunyadi had been asked what nationality he considers himself to be, he would have said Romanian last.

[@catalindale7296]

@jozsinagy9833 the kingdom were broken up some fought for Poland and while other fought for Hungarian and his own people would betray him to that time was hard to understand

[@jozsinagy9833]

@@catalindale7296 Bullshit.

[@peterbalogh8138]

@@jozsinagy9833 .... especially that there was no such an option for several centuries to come...

[@Mac-is4sd]

Good video, interesting story.

[@brassteeth3355]

Sigismund has interesting headgear. It is a hat?

[@historyprofiles]

@@brassteeth3355 it looks like one of those hats you wear when it’s cold like a Russian one 😂 multiple portraits of him though in various headgear

[@attilakovacs1415]

croatia-hungary personalunio from 1088--1920 ...2 coutnry..one kingdom...hungarian kingdom...

[@bbotond6384]

Great hungarian noble and leader.

[@almeu433]

Not Hungarian by blood

[@vodkasharkeez]

Serbians call him SIBINJANIN JANKO. That means Janko of Sibiu, unless there's another meaning, I wonder why they call him that? His castle in Hunedoara, Transylvania is a marvel of gothic architecture unparalleled with anything west of Prague.

[@Ταργιτάος1]

This is so true, and unfortunately many people don't know that this meant that she was a Janko from Transylvania, because at that time Transylvania was called Sibinja by the Serbs, and it is clear that it was named after the castle of Szeben - Sibiu!

[@latakicsi2183]

his grandchildren dnas was analyzed he is from serb side of banat in some degree but nothing from zsigmond whose title was the king of hungary too, so he served only the hungarian king

[@b8888whale]

Amazing

[@justinmorgan2126]

Why you couldn't use his real name, Hunyadi János, is beyond me.

[@zoltanperei4789]

Just like Báthory Erzsébet. They call her Elisabeth Bathory.

[@Arlechinu]

Or Iancu de Hunedoara rather 😄

[@jimanast3593]

10:40: Ð,đ is pronounced "g", so the name is "Djuradj". Also, I think that ć at the end of sirname is "tsh", so the name is "Brankovitsh".

[@yllbardh]

You're right *Ð,đ* is pronounced as *G* like in Germany and by the way Ðurađ is a variation of Georg. And about letter ć is almost the same as tch in witch.

[@Theodoros_Kolokotronis]

Christian Europe, wake up and rise again. The threat is imminent.. 🔥☦️✝️

[@fockewulf190d9]

interesting but careful with the number of troops, it's highly exaggerated. No way there were 80 000 ottoman troops, maybe 18 000. All of the Ottoman army during Mehmet II time had about 120 000 and many were allocated to garrison duty and security across the empire in Europe and Anatolia.

[@roach_is_online]

I didnt know john hunyadi was such a controversial figure these comments are wild

[@rener44]

The Hunyadi family popped up as an ancestors match. Common?

[@andreweden9405]

"She married a young noblewoman"??😃

[@juoreakande6316]

I was confused too lol

[@historyprofiles]

Mistake, was meant to say nobleman! Im so sorry! I can't beleive that made it past the quality check! My bad everyone!

[@andreweden9405]

@@historyprofiles , You're totally fine, it just made me question whether I was understanding things correctly! That's all!😂

[@arondebreceni9464]

@@historyprofiles Are you sure Romania existed at that time? Or that there were Romanian nobles in Transylvania at that time?

[@alexeidragunov4534]

You forgot to mention what language he Spoke

[@rabandris]

not romanian just be sure :D

[@Ταργιτάος1]

In reality, there never was a Hunyadi named Iancu de Hunedoara, these are the invented names of the great Romanian history falsifiers like Nicolae Iorga, because it is true that the Serbs and Croats called Janko, but they were never called that way in the Hungarian kingdom, and no such name is known from the Hunyadi archives! The Romanians faked his name from this Croatian Jankó to make it seem more Romanian than the name of Avram Iancu! Even 150 years ago, the majority of Romanians had not heard much about the Hunyadi people, they didn't even know who János Hunyadi and King Mátyás were! But the Romanian intellectuals knew, and they were very disturbed that the Hunyadi name became famous throughout Europe and that they were included among the greatest heroes of the world, and the main problem was that they were the Hungarian rulers! The Vlachs betrayed Hunyadi János several times in favor of the Turks, for example, in the battle of Varna, the voivode of Muntenia broke his promise and turned against the Hungarians! Why would the Vlachs have always betrayed Hunyadi if he had been of Romanian origin?! Or why did Hunyadi János never say that he came from Wallachia? Because in all contemporary data, he and his entire family considered themselves Hungarian Catholic nobles! In fact, he never went to Valachia to visit his birthplace, because no one can name what kind of settlement it is, and that's only because there isn't one! All these prove that in his time no one thought that he was of Vlach origin, and this is just a later invention! However, there is no contemporaneous information that János father Vajk came from Wallachia, because those were all much later references, which may not even have been true! But what we know for sure is that János Hunyadi's father was already a Catholic noble, because in the Hungarian kingdom only Catholic nobles could receive lands and estates, laws stipulated this! But it also turned out that in fact neither Hunyadi János nor his son Mátyás ever mentioned their ancestor named "Woyk" anywhere, and this may indicate that someone here already falsified the origin of the Hunyadi family after king Mátyás's death! We also know from accurate data, which the Romanians prefer to consciously hide, that the old Wallachia was first called Ungro-Vlahia (Ungrovlahia), for at least two hundred years, and this was also because Szeklers and Hungarians lived there, quite a few from the time of the Árpáds! The other problem is that no one has ever written down exactly where the Hunyadi people came from, i.e. the name of that settlement! But since we know very well that neither János nor his father Vajk ever asked for anything from the Wallachian Voivodeship, nor did they keep in touch with any relatives who might have stayed there, that's why this whole story is very doubtful! And the betrayal of the Wallachian voivodes, who betrayed János Hunyadi several times in different battles, but also later his son Mathia, prove that they hated them, because they were Hungarians!

[@jpmzo]

Was Hunyadi was a contemporary of Vlad Tepes?!

[@latakicsi2183]

his son was, Vlad Tepes was Matyas vasal

[@aliengalaxy6096]

Battle of Kosovo 1448 was the last chance to push out Ottomans from Europe, Hunyadi lost that important battle, because Romanians changed to the Ottoman side on the battlefield on the 3rd day of the battle. Because of many betrayals, Hunyadi led many retaliation campaigns against Wallachia, he executed Wallachian (Romanian) voivodes, installed new ones and forced them to serve Hungary as vassals. Today Romanians claim that Hungarians took "their hero" and Hungarian general-governor Hunyadi was "big Romanian hero", even they put his name in the Romanian anthem :D

[@CocoSon-we2rg]

And you walk around with lies about Romanians. At dawn on 19 October 1448, the Turks attacked on this day with troops from Anatolia, which had suffered much smaller losses the day before. The first wave of Turkish light troops was repulsed. Then they attacked the Spahis of Anatolia, on which the heavy cavalry of Ioan Szekely rushed. At that moment the sultan launched the attack on the whole front. Iancu de Hunedoara was in danger of death: he fell from his horse and was saved by one of his Hunedorians, named Todor, who lent him his horse. The governor would later gift him the estates for this act. However, disaster struck on the left wing. Turakhan's troops appeared behind the Hungarian front. Caught between two fires, Voivode Dan's army was slaughtered and forced to capitulate. The fragments of the Hungarian army had closed themselves inside the fortification formed by wagons.

[@andreasbalamuc2103]

what do u smoke.mongol!! ;)

[@jacoblamb3535]

This is slow at 1.5x but if I go to 2x I can’t examine the art at all. Record at a faster speaking pace.

[@JamesJackson-d9w]

💙

[@attilakovacs1415]

beograd not was serbia between 1000--1920,,, was hungarian kingdom..name..nándorfehérvár....

[@alexeidragunov4534]

You mean Iancu de Hunedoara🇹🇩

[@rabandris]

look hundeorara is already fromt the older name of Hunyad : Hunyadvára so he was not Iancu de hunedoara it is a romanisation id the XX c

[@gerardglenholmeswalsh1868]

Give me the Medici’s and the Sforza’s

[@Corvin-o7u]

Janos Hunyadi for a Hungarian or Jancu the son of Voicu, was born around the today city of Hunedoara. I grew up in the village Racastia and then in the city proper Hunedoara. The whole county Hunedoara is a very old land that belonged to the Dacians occupied by Roman armies after 106 AD. The Castle was built on a old Dacian fortress. Jancu served the Hungarian king and he NEVER did anything good for his Vlach people. Mattias, his son forgot that he was half Vlah or Romanian he married into the Hungarian nobility and stopped speaking Vlach, latin.

[@nicknem174]

Dacians have nothing to do with vlachs

[@Ταργιτάος1]

These are fairy tales and historical falsifications invented by Romanians like Daniel Roxin, so 0.1% is based on reality! In reality, there never was a Hunyadi named Iancu, these are the invented names of the great Romanian history falsifiers like Nicolae Iorga, because it is true that the Serbs and Croats called Hunyadi Jankó, but they were never called that way in the Hungarian kingdom, and no such name is known from the Hunyadi archives! The Romanians faked his name from this Croatian Jankó to make it seem more Romanian than the name of Avram Iancu! Even 150 years ago, the majority of Romanians had not heard much about the Hunyadi people, they didn't even know who János Hunyadi and King Mátyás were! But the Romanian intellectuals knew, and they were very disturbed that the Hunyadi name became famous throughout Europe and that they were included among the greatest heroes of the world, and the main problem was that they were the Hungarian rulers! Because these references were all much later writings, which were often spread by the enemies of King Matthias, and therefore it is quite possible that they were not true! But what we know for sure is that János Hunyadi's father was already a Catholic noble, because in the Hungarian kingdom only Catholic nobles could receive land and property, this was required by law! Based on the latest research, Hunyadi János was also born in Kolozsvár, and then it is understandable why his wife gave birth to his younger son, Mátyás, in the same royal city, because at that time it was the most developed center in the Eastern Hungarian kingdom! It also turned out that there is no contemporary information that the Vajk whom King Sigismund awarded with the county of Hunyad was really János's father! Posterity considered Vajk to be the father of János Hunyadi because two chroniclers in the time of King Matthias hinted that János's father might have come from Valachia?! Thuróczy János claims that he is "nobili et claro Transalpinae gentis de gremio natus erat", i.e. he comes from a noble and notable family from Transalpina, and that Zsigmond brought his father from there to his own country, but he adds: "fertur", that is, that's what they say, so you don't know from a reliable source! However, neither these chroniclers nor even King Matthias himself ever mentioned that his grandfather was called Woyk or Vajk! On the other hand, everyone is deeply silent about the fact that since then King Ulászló's certificate has also been found, in which he probably writes the following about Hunyadi János, who became her greatest general: "Joannes, filius Vajvode de Verebel." And this is also very interesting, because no one disputes that in the certificates "Petrus, filius Georgii de Vereb" or "Petrus Vajvode de Verebel" was the voivode Verebélyi Péter of Transylvania! And who became the voivode of Transylvania a few years later, but Hunyadi János?! Historians are silent about the fact that this Verebélyi family also has the raven in its coat of arms, and it looks like only these two great noble families in Hungary at that time had the raven in their coat of arms! For the Verebélyi family, the raven was by all accounts a reference to their origin, as it also turned out that there was a settlement called Hollós, which was their property and where a Hollósvár built by their ancestors could have existed! According to contemporary data, King Sigismund donated this settlement together with Kikinda to Hagymás László, and in an interesting way Hagymás sold it to Hunyadi János! Could it be that Hunyadi bought this settlement because he knew very well that his ancestors came from there?! It is also very interesting that nobody wanted to take this seriously, that the Italian chronicler of King Matthias, Antonio Bonfini, took the name "Corvinus" from the name of the Hungarian settlement of Hollós, because the name of the raven is corvus in Latin, but it was also written as corvinus in Roman times, from which Bonfini also derived a fictitious Roman origin. But the most likely data is what Bonfini could have taken from King Matthias himself, when he writes: "Mátyás Corvin, born to the father of János Hollós Hunyadi, took the first of his first names from the castle of Hunyad in the farthest part of Transylvania, and the other from the village in which he born." And here Bonfini was probably thinking of King Matthias' paternal ancestors. No matter how we take it, Bonfini clearly describes that King Matthias took his second given name, Corvin, Hollós in Hungarian, from the village Hollós, where his ancestors probably came from! According to the unmistakable words of King László V's often mentioned certificate of 1453, Hunyadi's ancestors received the right to use the coat of arms thanks to the grace of the Hungarian kings! This made it clear that their right to use the coat of arms did not start with his father, but much longer, which again contradicts the fact that Vajk was Hunyadi's father! However, we know very well about the family of "Vajk son of the Serb" that they did not use any coat of arms, at least no description of this has yet been found, so it is quite possible that they were really Cumans or Vlachs from Wallachia, who then disappeared in the storm of history, and János Hunyadi probably either received it from the king or bought their estates! And then this explains why King Matthias never wrote about his grandfather named Vajk, and also why the people of Hollós and Hunyadi had the right to use the ancient Hungarian coat of arms! Because it is certain that already in the first half of the 15th century, Hunyadi became the owner of the entire county of Hunyad, which is already mentioned as Huniad in the 1256 papal charter, and the town and the earthen castle where the castle of the Hunyadis was later built, as "Hungnod" and "Huniad", and it was never called Hunedoara until the 20th century! And this is certainly a name with an ancient Hungarian meaning, which was already written down from the 13th century, but it is probably much older! And I am writing this only because the Romanians also falsified the origin of this name, because they say that it has always been Hunedoara, only the Hungarians Hungarianized all ancient Romanian names! All these data also prove that the name and origin of Hunyadi János was already tried to be muddied and falsified during the time of King Matthias, but especially after Matthias's death, because more and more people have been doing this ever since, and if you think about how many enemies they already had in their lives too, then it's no wonder! Anyway, no one is talking about the fact that the genetic research taken from the bones of King Matthias's son and two grandsons also proved that the ancestors of the Hunyadi's had more ancient Avar and Hungarian genes from the Carpathian basin, and had nothing to do with the Balkan Vlachs! The other problem that contradicts Hunyadi's Romanian origin is the repeated betrayal of the Vlachs, who betrayed Hunyadi János several times in different battles, but later also his son King Mátyás, and this also proves that they were hated because they were Hungarians!

[@Ταργιτάος1]

The problem is that the Romanians are misled about the ethnogenesis of the Hungarians, without even knowing that the Hungarian chroniclers of the Middle Ages wrote about the multi-millenary ethnogenesis of the Magors-Hungarians, which begins with Nemrot - Nimrod, who was the first king in the world and who had two sons, Hunor and Magor, from whom came the Scythians called Huns and Magyars! Foreign chroniclers also wrote about them, and historians agree that this mythology is much more ancient than the mythology of European peoples in general. The difference between mythologies like "Romulus and Remus" and the mythology with "Hunor and Magor" is huge, not only in time and space, but also as cultural ethnogenesis, because Hunor and Magor always lived in brotherhood, and sought peace between peoples , they never went to war with each other, but their peoples were never in conflict either! The authors of Antiquity also wrote about Magor, but it also appears in the Bible as Magog. Titus Flavius Iosepphus roman writer wrote in the 1st century A.D. that all the Magorians come from Magog, who are all Scythians! The new historical data collated with the archaeogenetic ones proved to us that Magor's people were Europeans, probably European Scythians, and Hunor's people were those from Central Asia, and the mythology of the brothers "Hunor and Magor" would have been created from these two union of tribes! It's just that the genetic data clearly showed us that those who came from Asia were always in the minority compared to those from Europe. I quote a few lines from the publications of genetic origin research from the website of the Hungarian Research Institute: "The presence of the ancestors of today's Hungarians in the Carpathian Basin has been continuous for thousands of years" "A new database of 16,000 mitogenomes of 172 ancient and living populations has been created and investigated their connection system based on artificial intelligence method. The new algorithm recognizes all haplogroup correlations, regardless of the time of the process behind the correlation. A new methodological article has been published in the journal Molecular Genetics and Genomics by the researchers of the Archaeogenetic Research Center of the Hungarian Research Institute, the Department of Genetics of the University of Szeged, the Institute of Technical Physics and Materials Science." "The Carpathian Basin is an unbreakable unit Applying the method to the investigation of the former and present-day populations of the Carpathian Basin, the authors found that the vast majority of the present-day population is from a Copper Age (4500 BC-2800 BC) - Bronze Age (2800 BC-700 BC) can be traced back to a basic population, while immigration from the eastern steppe region seems to have had a smaller genetic impact on the population in the tenth-eleventh centuries." These data confirmed what the Hungarian chroniclers had already written, and some ancient writers also wrote such as Paulus Orosius, who wrote in the 5th century during the time of the Huns, that "The Huns invaded Pannonia, but the people there call that country Hungarya." And what some Hungarian archaeologists and anthropologists have also realized, especially in the last 120 years, that Árpád's people were very few compared to the population here, who stayed here even after the destruction of the Avars and welcomed Árpád's people as well! Archaeologist and historian László Gyula also came to the conclusion after several decades of research and excavations that Árpád's people found Hungarians in large numbers here in the Carpathian Basin, since in many places where Hungarian place names were already in the first descriptions, the so-called "conquerors" did not settle not even close! And archaeologist, historian and geographer Marjalaki Kiss Lajos describes the real origin of the Hungarians in a more comprehensible and concrete way in his work entitled "Historical Studies": „At the time of Árpád's occupation, the vast majority of Hungary, especially the eponymous but peasant population of the regions east of the Danube-Garam line - based on the geographical names of Anonymus - could not have been other than Hungarian, because since slavic nouns denoting Bulgarian-Slavic and Czech rule in the 9th century are dwarfed by the mass of more ancient Ugric-Hungarian names denoting larger geographical objects. None of the river names with Hungarian names mentioned in Anonymus's gesta has yet been proven to have been called something else before! But this is not likely, because the Danube, Tisza, Szamos, Körös, Temes, Olt, Zala, Rába, Balaton, etc. are known from sources before the 10th century. our waters also kept their old names, although their shores were known from history as Dacians, Celts, Illyrians, Romans, Sarmatians, Germans, Huns, Avars, Bulgarians, Slavs and Hungarians. It should be noted that if the Hungarian-speaking common people had only come to our country with Árpád, then there would be no Hungarian vineyard names in our earliest certificates. And there are quite a few of them already. Who were the original inhabitants of Transylvania? The crown witnesses of this case are the river names. And the water names of the landscapes east of the Tisza, both in Anonymus and in Ortvay's two-volume collection of water names from Árpád's time, as well as the water names that have developed in the course of history and are still in use today, and which have been commonplace in the Hungarian, Transylvanian Saxon and Vlach languages, indisputably testify to Hungarian origin and Hungarian aboriginal population. Some examples: Szamos, Almás, Kapus, Sár, Körös, Tekerő, Tur, Maros, Poklos, Hölgyes, Hódos, Gyepes, Medgyes, Barca, Olt, Árpás, Hévíz, Sebes, Nádas, Kékes, Aranyos, Bodza, Homoród, Hideg, Lápos… Not one of the larger river names has an Vlach name, but they also use the same names as the Hungarians and Saxons. Witnesses of the primacy of the population, the river names thus testify to the certainty of Hungarian ancestry."

[@nicknem174]

@Ταργιτάος1 not just hydronyms but toponyms as well prove that that vlachs are latecomers to the area, as these names are hungarian/germanic/slavic/ old turk origin. Moreover daco-taco romanians dont really care about the fact that for 700 years they used hungarian names for roman/dacian names such as Cluj to Napoca, slavic Gradiste for the dacian fort Sarmisgethusa etc. This had only changed after the big fairytale creator Ceausescu rewritten their history in a chauvinistic style.

[@Ταργιτάος1]

@@nicknem174 The renowned historian and linguist Kniezsa István writes, based on his research, that 83% of the names of the places mentioned in Transylvania up to the year 1300 are Hungarian, and only 0.6% are Romanian! Of the 1757 names recorded up to the year 1400, 1355 names are of Hungarian origin (77%) and 76 Romanian (4.3%), and a small number of names are Slavic, Germanic, Turkish and of unknown origin! These data are very important from the perspective of the origin of these communities, because from these names of settlements and geographical names you can see the emergence and gradual growth of the Wallachian population, who spoke a completely different language! And this is what the indoctrinated Romanians don't want to understand, that these names clearly understood in the Hungarian language could not be translated by them, because these two languages ​​differ extremely much, and that's why they started to imitate these names, and it just came out crooked , which often means absolutely nothing in Romanian! Because there are still many uneducated Romanians who believed the story of these falsifiers of history, that the Hungarians would have Hungarianized the old Romanian names from Transylvania and from the parts of eastern Hungary, where Romanians still live, but for someone who knows both languages ​​this is absolutely absurd! And all this clearly proves that the Romanians could not be natives of Transylvania, something that the Vlachs never believed anyway, but until the historians of the Transylvanian Romanian school appeared with these phantasmagoric stories in the 19th century!

[@AceSandar]

Watch at 1,25 speed

[@jozsinagy9833]

The truth is that no one knows Hunyadi's exact origins, no one knows what his mother tongue was or what language his parents spoke, and we don't even know what nationality Hunyadi considered himself to be. In the Middle Ages, this was not as important as it is today, but a few things are certain: Hunyadi was the governor of Magyarorszűg, then its captain-in-chief, and he fought for Hungary as a Hungarian nobleman. All the rest is speculation and shouldn't be dealt with, but for some reason Romanians can't let go of this atheme. On such a basis, one could also deal with the fact that Mihály Vitéz was of Greek origin, but interestingly, under the videos related to him, the Romanians do not write that Mihály Vitáz was not even Romanian. A joke.

[@istvansovari4208]

Mielőtt ostobaságot ír-tájékozódjon.Mindenki magából indul ki.Tehát ön nem tudja ki fia borja-ráadásul reménytelenül tanulatlan.

[@homerfj1100]

Did he build far Eastern cars?

[@jackjohnson40]

Verbose, but enjoyable

[@scorilo6779]

Ioan Getul ! Is how they called him 😉

[@hyunkattube]

So one of his descendant found the automobile company?

[@lisapop5219]

That is a fabulous stash 😂

[@Barnaby_bo]

Sultan vinegar

[@BTL6666]

According to most contemporary sources, he was the member of a noble family of Wallachian ancestry! János Hunyadi’s father, Vajk( VOICU in Romanian), came from Wallachia (now southern Romania) to the court of the Hungarian King Sigismund of Luxemburg, and received the estate of Hunyadvár (today Vajdahunyad in Hungarian and Hunedoara in Romanian, located in Transylvania, Romania) as a perpetual gift in 1409. Where is the mystery and why saying his ancestry is a matter of debate?!...the only thing here is that he was a Romanian/valach who ruled Hungary as Governor! He spoke well Romanian and also Hungarian!...Either you do not have the whole information about him or you just cited the Western sources + of course the Hungarian ones- they will present him always something else, but not a Romanian!( guess why?) :))))....you should check also the sources from the country of Romania. You will be surprised!

[@Ταργιτάος1]

You Romanians have already written so many lies about the Hunyadians and the whole of Hungarian history that a river could be blocked with them! But the reality is that there is no contemporary data that "Woyk", whom King Sigismund rewarded with Hunyad Castle, was really the father of Hunyadi János, because these were all much later references that were falsified even in the last century! But what we know for sure is that Hunyadi's father was already a Catholic noble, because in the Hungarian kingdom only Catholic nobles could receive lands and estates, laws stipulated this! Or why did Hunyadi János or his son King Matthias, never say that their ancestors came from Wallachia? Because in all contemporary data, he and his entire family considered themselves Hungarian Catholic nobles! In fact, he never went to Wallachia to visit his birthplace, because no one can name what kind of settlement it is, and that's only because there isn't one! Many people refer to Thuróczy János and Antonio Bonfini when discussing Romanian ancestry when want to prove it, but in fact these chroniclers did not write anything specific and wrote their works many decades after Hunyadi János death! Thuróczy claims that "nobili et claro Transalpinae gentis de gremio natus erat", and they refer to this as meaning that he comes from a noble and notable family from Transalpina, and that Zsigmond brought his father from there to his own country. But these falsifiers of history never say that Thuróczy then adds: ‟‟fertur‟‟ that is, they just say it like that, so this means that it is a rumor, he does not know from a reliable source! On the contrary, all such forgers are now deeply silent about the fact that since then the certificate of King László V., under whom Hunyadi János served the most, has been found, and in this certificate he writes the following about Hunyadi: "Joannes, filius Vajvode de Verebel." And this is also very interesting, because no one disputes that in the certificates "Petrus, filius Georgii de Vereb" or "Petrus Vajvode de Verebel" was the Hungarian voivode Péter Verebélyi of Transylvania! And who became the voivode of Transylvania ten years later, but Hunyadi János?! Historians are silent about the fact that this Verebélyi family also has the raven in its coat of arms, and it looks like only these two great noble families in Hungary at that time had the raven in their coat of arms! For the Verebély family, the raven - holló was by all accounts a reference to their origin, as it also turned out that there was a settlement called Hollós, which was their property and where a Hollósvár built by their ancestors could have existed! Because those who don't know Hungarian don't even know that the name of the raven is holló in Hungarian, and that's how this settlement and the castle were called! According to contemporary data, King Sigismund donated this settlement together with Kikinda to László Hagymás, and Hagymás sold it to János Hunyadi. Isn't it logical that Hunyadi bought the settlement where his ancestors came from? And then here comes the very interesting thing, that no one thought that the Italian chronicler of King Matthias, Antonio Bonfini, took this name "Corvinus" from the name of the Hungarian settlement Hollós, because the name of the raven is corvus in Latin, but also corvinus in the time of the Romans was written, from which Bonfini also derived a fictitious Roman origin. But this had nothing to do with the Romanians at that time, since at that time the Vlachs had not even invented their Roman origins, let alone their Daco-Roman origin! And now the most likely data that Bonfini could have taken from Mátyás is when he writes: "Matthias Corvin, born to the father of Hunyadi Hollós János, took the first of his first names from Hunyad Castle, located in the farthest part of Transylvania, and the other from the village in which he born." And here, Bonfini was probably referring to the paternal ancestors of King Mátyás, but some people deliberately misinterpreted his writing, because our academic historians explain this as Bonfini must have been wrong here as well, since Mátyás was born in Kolozsvár - Cluj, but here it is not about Mátyás and not even about Hunyadi János! No matter how we take it, Antonio Bonfini clearly describes that Mátyás took his second first name, Corvin, or Hollós in Hungarian, from the village, i.e. Hollós, from which his ancestors came! According to the unmistakable words of King László V's often mentioned 1453 certificate, Hunyadi's ancestors had the right to use a coat of arms thanks to the grace of the Hungarian kings! So this also strongly proves that they could not use their coat of arms starting with their father, but for much longer, probably for many centuries, which completely contradicts the fact that Hunyadi's father was Woyk! However, we do not know of the Woyk's family that they used any kind of coat of arms, at least no description of this has yet been found, so it is quite possible that they were really Cumans or Vlachs from Wallachia, who then disappeared in the storm of history, and may have been taken their property by Hunyadi János, and this is where the confusion comes from later! Because it is certain that already in the first half of the 15th century, Hunyadi became the owner of the entire county of Hunyad, which is already mentioned as Huniad in the 1256 papal charter! And the town and the earthen castle where the castle of the Hunyadis was later built, was mentioned as Hungnod and Huniad. And this is certainly a name with an ancient Hungarian meaning, which was already written down from the 13th century, but it is probably much older! And I am writing this only because the Romanians also falsified the origin of this name, because they say that it has always been Hunedoara, but it is certain that this did not mean anything in Romanian either, and the first Vlachs renamed this county and castle in their own language in a mirror translation! Anyway, it is now a genetically proven fact that the Hunyadi family could not have come from the Romanians, because they were able to take very good quality samples from the bones of King Matthias' son János Corvin and his minor child found in Lepoglava, Croatia! The samples belonging to the same main group as the Hunyadis from the Carpathian Basin are the following: an Avar sample (AD 650-675). A sample of a Hungarian elite soldier, conquest period (895-950 AD) (Neparáczki et al. 2019) and a sample of a medieval Hungarian noble (Nagy et al. 2021, Olasz et al. 2019). And all of this confirms Hunyadi's blood relationship with the Verebélyi's family! But I ask, about which these scoundrel historians are deeply silent, where are the graves of Woyk and his family? Because if the graves of Hunyadi and his son László are there in the Archbishop's Cathedral of Gyulafehérvár, then at least the graves of his father and mother should be somewhere nearby, right? But no one knows anything about them, not even his mother, and this can only be explained by the fact that it was because they were from Verebélyi blood, and they really have their graves, and moreover, sarcophags similar to Hunyadi's, and the raven is also on them! The other big lie is the name Voicu, because nobody knows such Romanians from history, and it is just like Iancu, because they never called Hunyadi named Iancu, this was also forged after the name of Avram Iancu to make it acceptable to the Romanians! These are the invented names of the great Romanian history falsifiers, such as Nicolae Iorga, because it is true that the Serbs and Croats called Hunyadi Janko, but no one in the Hungarian kingdom ever called him that, so probably not even his family, and such a name is not known from the medieval archives! Even 150 years ago, the majority of Romanians had not heard much about Hunyadi, they didn't even know who János Hunyadi and King Mátyás were! But the Romanian intellectuals knew, and they were very disturbed that the Hunyadi name became famous throughout Europe and that they were included among the greatest heroes of the world, and the main problem was that they were the Hungarian rulers! The Vlachs betrayed Hunyadi János several times in favor of the Turks, for example, in the battle of Varna, the voivode of Muntenia broke his promise and turned against the Hungarians! Why would the Vlachs have always betrayed Hunyadi János and his son King Matthias if he had been of Romanian origin?!

[@istvansovari4208]

Mert a román forrás????Ha-ha-ha! Milyen "román" forrás???? Na,okoska román,KÉRDÉS: KI LEHET MAGYAR KIRÁLY? MI a feltétele? Na,ma megint jót nevettem....román forrás.....

[@latakicsi2183]

"According to most contemporary sources" you mean only rumanian ones... his grandchildren dnas was analyzed he is from serb side of banat in some degree so your anthem is a big fat lie about him you dont have history so try hijacking heros from here and there

[@rabandris]

egy kibaszott román forrást mutassatok már a témában , ami nem a XIX század után keletkezett

[@waatsookitopii4806]

Hunya

[@alexeidragunov4534]

He was 100% Romanian , even the Hungarian recognize that as he spoke perfect Romanian first and then hungarian, latin and intalian

[@1000nandy]

🤡 💩

[@attilakovacs2231]

@@1000nandy r*manian, right? What a clown we have here 🤣

[@attilakovacs1415]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/hYXMdnSZi8-brtU

[@attilakovacs1415]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/mJbao6B-aJWnmM0

[@Ταργιτάος1]

You Romanians have already written so many lies about the Hunyadians and the whole of Hungarian history that a river could be blocked with them! In reality, there never was a Hunyadi named Iancu de Huneadoara, these are the invented names of the great Romanian history falsifiers, because it is true that the Serbs and Croats called Hunyadi Jankó, but they were never called that way in the Hungarian kingdom, and no such name is known from the Hunyadi archives! The Romanians faked his name from this Croatian Jankó to make it seem more Romanian than the name of Avram Iancu! Even 150 years ago, the majority of Romanians had not heard much about the Hunyadi people, they didn't even know who János Hunyadi and King Mátyás were! But the Romanian intellectuals knew, and they were very disturbed that the Hunyadi name became famous throughout Europe and that they were included among the greatest heroes of the world, and the main problem was that they were the Hungarian rulers! The other big lie is the name Voicu, because nobody knows such Romanians from history, and it is just like Iancu, which these vile history falsifiers wanted to be similar to the ancient Hungarian name Vajk, but neither Voicu nor Woyk or Vajk means anything in Romanian! But the reality is that there is no contemporary data that "Woyk", whom King Sigismund rewarded with Hunyad Castle, was really the father of Hunyadi János, because these were all much later references that were falsified even in the last century! But what we know for sure is that Hunyadi's father was already a Catholic noble, because in the Hungarian kingdom only Catholic nobles could receive lands and estates, laws stipulated this! Or why did Hunyadi János or his son King Matthias, never say that their ancestors came from Wallachia? Because in all contemporary data, he and his entire family considered themselves Hungarian Catholic nobles! In fact, he never went to Wallachia to visit his birthplace, because no one can name what kind of settlement it is, and that's only because there isn't one! Anyway, according to the latest historical data, Hunyadi János was also born in the same city where his son, in Kolozsvár, and according to all real data, he came from an ancient Hungarian noble family, since Vlachs were not even seen in that city at that time, because only Hungarians could live there and Saxons! The Vlachs betrayed Hunyadi János several times in favor of the Turks, for example, in the battle of Varna, the voivode of Muntenia broke his promise and turned against the Hungarians! Why would the Vlachs have always betrayed Hunyadi if he had been of Romanian origin?! Or why did Hunyadi János never say that he came from Wallachia? Because in all contemporary data, he and his entire family considered themselves Hungarian Catholic nobles! In fact, he never went to Valachia to visit his birthplace, because no one can name what kind of settlement it is, and that's only because such a settlement never existed there! All these prove that in his time no one thought that he was of Vlach origin, and this is just a later invention!

[@alexeidragunov4534]

Vlad the Impaler and Stephan the Great of Moldova were cousins part of the same family and Hunyady was romanian as he spoke romanian and it was their Uncle

[@1000nandy]

Evidence? Show me a document proving it. 🤡

[@attilakovacs1415]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/hYXMdnSZi8-brtU

[@rabandris]

any source can you citate which prove that he spoke well romanian ?

[@Ταργιτάος1]

You Romanians have already written so many lies about the Hunyadis and the whole of Hungarian history that a river could be blocked with them! But the reality is that there is no contemporary data that "Woyk filii Serbe", whom King Sigismund rewarded with Hunyad Castle, was really the father of Hunyadi János, because these were all much later references that were falsified even in the last century! But what we know for sure is that Hunyadi's father was already a Catholic noble, because in the Hungarian kingdom only Catholic nobles could receive lands and estates, laws stipulated this! Or why did Hunyadi János or his son King Matthias, never say that their ancestors came from Wallachia? Because in all contemporary data, he and his entire family considered themselves Hungarian Catholic nobles! Many people refer to Thuróczy János and Antonio Bonfini when discussing Valachian ancestry when want to prove it, but in fact these chroniclers did not write anything specific and wrote their works many decades after Hunyadi János death! Thuróczy claims that "nobili et claro Transalpinae gentis de gremio natus erat", and they refer to this as meaning that he comes from a noble and notable family from Transalpina, and that Zsigmond brought his father from there to his own country. But these falsifiers of history never say that Thuróczy then adds: ‟fertur‟ that is, they just say it like that, so this means that it is a rumor, he does not know from a reliable source! On the contrary, all such forgers are now deeply silent about the fact that since then the certificate of King László V., under whom Hunyadi János served the most, has been found, and in this certificate he writes the following about Hunyadi: "Joannes, filius Vajvode de Verebel." And this is also very interesting, because no one disputes that in the certificates "Petrus, filius Georgii de Vereb" or "Petrus Vajvode de Verebel" was the Hungarian voivode Péter Verebélyi of Transylvania! And who became the voivode of Transylvania ten years later, but Hunyadi János?! Historians are silent about the fact that this Verebélyi family also has the raven in its coat of arms, and it looks like only these two great noble families in Hungary at that time had the raven in their coat of arms! For the Verebély family, the raven was by all accounts a reference to their origin, as it also turned out that there was a settlement called Hollós, which was their property and where a Hollósvár - Raven castle built by their ancestors could have existed! And then here comes the very interesting thing, that no one thought that the Italian chronicler of King Matthias, Antonio Bonfini, took this name "Corvinus" from the name of the Hungarian settlement Hollós, because the name of the raven is corvus in Latin, from which Bonfini also derived a fictitious Roman origin. But this had nothing to do with the Romanians at that time, since at that time the Vlachs had not even invented their Roman origins, let alone their Daco-Roman origin! And now the most likely data that Bonfini could have taken from Mátyás is when he writes: "Matthias Corvin, born to the father of Hunyadi Hollós János, took the first of his first names from Hunyad Castle, located in the farthest part of Transylvania, and the other from the village in which he born." And here, Bonfini was probably referring to the paternal ancestors of King Mátyás, but some people deliberately misinterpreted his writing, because our academic historians explain this as Bonfini must have been wrong here as well, since Mátyás was born in Kolozsvár, but here it is not about Mátyás! No matter how we take it, Antonio Bonfini clearly describes that Mátyás took his second first name, Corvin, or Hollós in Hungarian, from the village, i.e. Hollós, from which his ancestors came! According to the unmistakable words of King László V's often mentioned 1453 certificate, Hunyadi's ancestors had the right to use a coat of arms thanks to the grace of the Hungarian kings! So this also strongly proves that they could not use their coat of arms starting with their father, but for much longer, probably for many centuries, which completely contradicts the fact that Hunyadi's father was Woyk or Vajk! However, we do not know of the Woyk's family that they used any kind of coat of arms, at least no description of this has yet been found, so it is quite possible that they were really Cumans or Vlachs from Wallachia, who then disappeared in the storm of history, and may have been taken their property by Hunyadi János, and this is where the confusion comes from later! But I ask, about which these scoundrel historians are deeply silent, where are the graves of Woyk and his family? Because if the graves of Hunyadi and his son László are there in the Archbishop's Cathedral of Gyulafehérvár - Alba Iulia, then at least the graves of his father and mother should be somewhere nearby, or somewhere in Vajdahunyad - Hunedoare, but they are nowhere! But no one knows anything about them, not even his mother, and this can only be explained by the fact that it was because they were from Verebélyi blood, and they really have their graves, and moreover, sarcophags similar to Hunyadi's, and the raven is also on them! If you do not take into account the original data from the 15th century, where János Hunyadi was considered everywhere to be a Hungarian nobleman, who had the right to an ancient Hungarian coat of arms, and nothing was written anywhere that he or his father considered themselves to be other than Hungarians, then at least we try to accept the genetic data! These genetic data have already been published, the bone samples of which come from the grandson of János Hunyadi, János Corvin and his children, and from these it is clear that the people of Hunyadi were no different from the Hungarian nobility of that time! Researchers from the Hungarian Research Institute, the University of Szeged, the University of Pécs, the Hungarian Judicial Research Institute, researchers from the Croatian Ministry of Culture and Media, and geneticists from Atlanta's Praxis Genomics LLC have identified the origin of the Hunyadi people! The acheogenetic results was published in the international specialist journal Heliyon, and the results are now available to everyone all over the world, that the Hunyadi family had nothing to do with the Romanians, their ancestors did not come from Wallachia! I quote a few lines from the publication: „The wide Eurasian distribution of the identified haplogroup is supported by the two closest archaic samples currently described: one from medieval Sardinia (Marcus et al. 2020) and a sample belonging to the Otrar-Karatau culture from the Iron Age Kazakh steppe (Gnecchi-Ruscone et al. 2021). The samples belonging to the main group from the Carpathian Basin are the following: an Avar sample (AD 650-675), an elite conquest sample (AD 895-950) (Neparáczki et al. 2019) and a medieval example of a Hungarian nobleman (Nagy et al. 2021, Olasz et al. 2019). Kristóf Corvin belongs to the rare, sporadically occurring mitochondrial haplogroup T2c1+146, which is the most common in the Mediterranean, his father belongs to the T2b group, which is widespread throughout Eurasia. The genetic origin of both maternal lines is compatible with the mother's origin known from historical data.” „The entire genome sequence of both individuals was determined by next-generation sequencing. Both belong to the E1b1b1a1b1a6a1c~ Y chromosome haplogroup, which has a wide Eurasian distribution. The father-son genetic relationship was confirmed by classical STR methods and whole genome data. PCA analysis, Unsupervised Admixture and f3-outgroup analysis were performed from the genome data. All genome analyzes indicated that the Corvins have an ancient European genome composition. That is, they show the highest genetic similarity with the European Neolithic samples (which peoples can also be traced back to the Carpathian basin) and with the ancient Hungarian Neolithic and Copper Age maints, such as from the Kőrös culture (6000-5500 BC), the Alföldi Linear Ceramic Culture (5500-5000 BC), samples from the Transdanubian Polish culture (5000-4400 BC) or Bodrogkeresztúr culture (4000-3600 BC)." And before you say that these are also the ancestors of the Romanians, I draw your attention to the fact that it is not true, because according to the archaeogenetic data, these were the ancestors of the Hungarians in the Carpathian basin, long before a large number of northern Slavic and southern Balkan peoples moved here!

[@zainulmuqsit877]

He was severely beaten and Hungary defeated and absorbed by Ottoman Empire .lol

[@peterbalogh8138]

Strange, the he gave such a whupping to the Turks in 1456 that they went home with their tail between their legs, and came back only 70 years afzet his death.

[@latakicsi2183]

your timeline is wrong...in 1456 the ossmans were the losers

[@rod8685]

Hunyadi is a Hungarian hero, Vlad Tepesh the Butcher is the hero of the Romanians. Hunyadi and Tepesh were enemies.

[@mimisor66]

The Kingdom of Hungary was multiethnic. Many of your leaders were from different ethnic backgrounds. But of course, they were all Hungarian as subjects of the Hungarian king. But your racism makes it difficult for you to accept the Romanian blood of such significant figures of your history, when in fact even many noble Transylvanian families were of Romanian descent, like the Dragffys.

[@istvansovari4208]

A román abban a korban NEM LÉTEZIK.Akkor nem volt soknemzetiségű az ország.Nincsenek szlávok,nincsenek románok, nincsenek germánok.Vannak viszont jászok,kis és nagy kunok, szászok (Erdélyben) székelyek,hunok,magyarok,németek (avarok), wlachok.(köztük szláv,magyar,kun)

[@MihailȘerban-g9y]

​@@istvansovari4208și voi ca și verii voștri muscali faceți un talmesh - balmesh din adevăr și minciuna pentru a manipula oamenii...

[@rabandris]

the problem the is no any proof about his nationalistic idea. There is clear proof about his origin . He had no any romanian culture , just an example he was catholic it is not a racism just in Hungary we are fed up with the romanian fake history

[@CognitiveDissident-b7m]

John Hyundai? I thawt he woz well Korean innit

[@goodrecipes2283]

His father wasn’t any king. Iancu of Hunedoara was a of Vlach origin ( old Romanians) . He always referred to himself as Iancu the Getae, Getae being what Greeks called the Dacians. Iancu of Hunedoara being the son of the king is just a fairytale. Don’t you think that if he was the son of a king he would have referred to this fact and probably would have wanted the throne for himself. Even when his son , Matei Corvin became king , he was reproached by Ferdinand of Habsburg that he didn’t have royal origins and Matei Corvin answered by referring to his Romanian roots.

[@Ταργιτάος1]

The reality is that there is no contemporary data that "Woyk", was really the father of Hunyadi János, because these were all much later references that were falsified even in the last century! It could easily be that this Woyk was a fictional person who didn't even exist in reality, since no one knows where his grave is, neither his alleged father nor his alleged brothers! But what we know for sure is that Hunyadi's father was already a Catholic noble, because in the Hungarian kingdom only Catholic nobles could receive lands and estates, laws stipulated this! Or why did Hunyadi János or his son King Matthias, never say that their ancestors came from Wallachia? Because in all contemporary data, he and his entire family considered themselves Hungarian Catholic nobles! In fact, he never went to Wallachia to visit his birthplace, because no one can name what kind of settlement it is, and that's only because there isn't one! Many people refer to Thuróczy János and Antonio Bonfini when discussing Romanian ancestry when want to prove it, but in fact these chroniclers did not write anything specific and wrote their works many decades after Hunyadi János death! Thuróczy claims that "nobili et claro Transalpinae gentis de gremio natus erat", and they refer to this as meaning that he comes from a noble and notable family from Transalpina, and that Zsigmond brought his father from there to his own country. But these falsifiers of history never say that Thuróczy then adds: ‟‟fertur‟‟ that is, they just say it like that, so this means that it is a rumor, he does not know from a reliable source! On the contrary, all such forgers are now deeply silent about the fact that since then the certificate of King László V., under whom Hunyadi János served the most, has been found, and in this certificate he writes the following about Hunyadi: "Joannes, filius Vajvode de Verebel." And this is also very interesting, because no one disputes that in the certificates "Petrus, filius Georgii de Vereb" or "Petrus Vajvode de Verebel" was the Hungarian voivode Péter Verebélyi of Transylvania! And who became the voivode of Transylvania ten years later, but Hunyadi János?! Historians are silent about the fact that this Verebélyi family also has the raven in its coat of arms, and it looks like only these two great noble families in Hungary at that time had the raven in their coat of arms! For the Verebély family, the raven - holló was by all accounts a reference to their origin, as it also turned out that there was a settlement called Hollós, which was their property and where a Hollósvár built by their ancestors could have existed! Because those who don't know Hungarian don't even know that the name of the raven is holló in Hungarian, and that's how this settlement and the castle were called! According to contemporary data, King Sigismund donated this settlement together with Kikinda to Hagymás László the lord of Bánság, and later Hagymás sold it to Hunyadi. Isn't it logical that Hunyadi János bought the settlement where his ancestors came from?! And then here comes the very interesting thing, that no one thought that the Italian chronicler of King Matthias, Antonio Bonfini, took this name "Corvinus" from the name of the Hungarian settlement Hollós, because the name of the raven is corvus in Latin, but also corvinus in the time of the Romans was written, from which Bonfini also derived a fictitious Roman origin. But this had nothing to do with the Romanians at that time, since at that time the Vlachs had not even invented their Roman origins, let alone their Daco-Roman origin! And now the most likely data that Bonfini could have taken from Mátyás is when he writes: "Matthias Corvin, born to the father of Hunyadi Hollós János, took the first of his first names from Hunyad Castle, located in the farthest part of Transylvania, and the other from the village in which he born." And here, Bonfini was probably referring to the paternal ancestors of King Mátyás, but some people deliberately misinterpreted his writing, because our academic historians explain this as Bonfini must have been wrong here as well, since Mátyás was born in Kolozsvár - Cluj, but here it is not about Mátyás and not even about Hunyadi János, but probably about his father! No matter how we take it, Antonio Bonfini clearly describes that Mátyás took his second first name, Corvin, or Hollós in Hungarian, from the village, i.e. Hollós, from which his ancestors came! According to the unmistakable words of King László V's often mentioned 1453 certificate, Hunyadi's ancestors had the right to use a coat of arms thanks to the grace of the Hungarian kings! So this also strongly proves that they could not use their coat of arms starting with their father, but for much longer, probably for many centuries, which completely contradicts the fact that Hunyadi's father was Woyk! However, we do not know of the Woyk's family that they used any kind of coat of arms, at least no description of this has yet been found, so it is quite possible that they were really Cumans or Vlachs from Wallachia, who then disappeared in the storm of history, and may have been taken their property by Hunyadi János, and this is where the confusion comes from later! Because it is certain that already in the first half of the 15th century, Hunyadi became the owner of the entire county of Hunyad, which is already mentioned as Huniad in the 1256 papal charter! And the town and the earthen castle where the castle of the Hunyadis was later built, was mentioned as Hungnod and Huniad. And this is certainly a name with an ancient Hungarian meaning, which was already written down from the 13th century, but it is probably much older! And I am writing this only because the Romanians also falsified the origin of this name, because they say that it has always been Hunedoara, but it is certain that this did not mean anything in Romanian either, and the first Vlachs renamed this county and castle in their own language in a mirror translation! Anyway, it is now a genetically proven fact that the Hunyadi family could not have come from the Romanians, because they were able to take very good quality samples from the bones of King Matthias' son Corvin János and his minor child found in Lepoglava, Croatia!

[@Dave-xb3xe]

"I believe it's pronounced Hyundai..." :p

[@rod8685]

Dear video creator, Hunyadi's mother is unknown. And the fact that his father was Zsigmond is just fairy tale.

[@istvansovari4208]

Tényleg??? KI lehet magyar Király???? Mi a FELTÉTEL????? Mi alapon akart Mátyás király Német-római császár lenni??? Kétségbe vonta valaki????????????????

[@rod8685]

@istvansovari4208 Az erő alapján. Erős hadsereg, erős gazdaság, erős szövetségesek és támogatók. De láthatod, hogy még ez is kevés volt. Gyorsan megmérgezték, mielőtt megvalósíthatta volna a terveit.

[@istvansovari4208]

@@rod8685 NEM. Nincs igazad. Mint Zsigmond unoka követelte a császári trónt.A gond az volt,hogy a lengyelek hátba támadták.Nem véletlenül a halála után a magyar csapatok már másnap kivonultak az elfoglalt nyugati területekről.

[@rod8685]

@istvansovari4208 Azt elképzelhetetlennek tartod, hogy Mátyás szinezte ki (hű bizalmasai hintették el a pletykákat) Zsigmond és apja közötti jó kapcsolatot, hogy ezáltal ezzel is erősítse igényét a birodalmi trónra?

[@istvansovari4208]

@@rod8685 Elképzelhetetlennek.Ha a történelemmel foglalkozol-rengeteget segít-képzeld magadat a korba.1.Ki lehet magyar király? Mi a feltétel?Zsigmond minden idők legnagyobb területű uralkodója.Miért íratja egész Hunyadot a csecsemő Jánosra?Miért viszi magával Jánost mindenhová?Hunyadi család nagycímerébe hogyan kerül az Árpád-sáv? Csak egyféle képen.Egyébként is: Mit gondolsz,a Habsburg nem írta volna tele a világot ez ügyben-ha nem igaz a származás? Miért kerül a képbe Wajk?Ha a magyar nép úgy dönt,hogy nincs igaza-akkor Mátyás akár fejre is állhatott volna. Lásd Salamon dolgát.

[@thieph]

His father was romanian, this is what historian sources say. Hungarians don't want to recognize that their best dynasty was romanian😂

[@TheCount01]

Must be good stuff you’re smoking there bud.

[@thieph]

@@TheCount01 i don't smoke dry horse shit like you, mongol

[@Ταργιτάος1]

@@thieph According to all real data, she came from an ancient Hungarian noble family and had nothing to do with the Romanians, because this was recently confirmed by archaeogenetic studies! The reality is that there is no contemporary data that "Woyk", whom King Sigismund rewarded with Hunyad Castle, was really the father of Hunyadi János, because these were all much later references that were falsified even in the last century! But what we know for sure is that Hunyadi's father was already a Catholic noble, because in the Hungarian kingdom only Catholic nobles could receive lands and estates, laws stipulated this! Or why did Hunyadi János or his son King Matthias, never say that their ancestors came from Wallachia? Because in all contemporary data, he and his entire family considered themselves Hungarian Catholic nobles! In fact, he never went to Wallachia to visit his birthplace, because no one can name what kind of settlement it is, and that's only because there isn't one! Many people refer to Thuróczy János and Antonio Bonfini when discussing Romanian ancestry when want to prove it, but in fact these chroniclers did not write anything specific and wrote their works many decades after Hunyadi János death! Thuróczy claims that "nobili et claro Transalpinae gentis de gremio natus erat", and they refer to this as meaning that he comes from a noble and notable family from Transalpina, and that Zsigmond brought his father from there to his own country. But these falsifiers of history never say that Thuróczy then adds: ‟‟fertur‟‟ that is, they just say it like that, so this means that it is a rumor, he does not know from a reliable source! On the contrary, all such forgers are now deeply silent about the fact that since then the certificate of King László V., under whom Hunyadi János served the most, has been found, and in this certificate he writes the following about Hunyadi: "Joannes, filius Vajvode de Verebel." And this is also very interesting, because no one disputes that in the certificates "Petrus, filius Georgii de Vereb" or "Petrus Vajvode de Verebel" was the Hungarian voivode Péter Verebélyi of Transylvania! And who became the voivode of Transylvania ten years later, but Hunyadi János?! Historians are silent about the fact that this Verebélyi family also has the raven in its coat of arms, and it looks like only these two great noble families in Hungary at that time had the raven in their coat of arms! For the Verebély family, the raven - holló was by all accounts a reference to their origin, as it also turned out that there was a settlement called Hollós, which was their property and where a Hollósvár built by their ancestors could have existed! Because those who don't know Hungarian don't even know that the name of the raven is holló in Hungarian, and that's how this settlement and the castle were called! According to contemporary data, King Sigismund donated this settlement together with Kikinda to László Hagymás, and Hagymás sold it to János Hunyadi. Isn't it logical that Hunyadi bought the settlement where his ancestors came from? And then here comes the very interesting thing, that no one thought that the Italian chronicler of King Matthias, Antonio Bonfini, took this name "Corvinus" from the name of the Hungarian settlement Hollós, because the name of the raven is corvus in Latin, but also corvinus in the time of the Romans was written, from which Bonfini also derived a fictitious Roman origin. But this had nothing to do with the Romanians at that time, since at that time the Vlachs had not even invented their Roman origins, let alone their Daco-Roman origin! And now the most likely data that Bonfini could have taken from Mátyás is when he writes: "Matthias Corvin, born to the father of Hunyadi Hollós János, took the first of his first names from Hunyad Castle, located in the farthest part of Transylvania, and the other from the village in which he born." And here, Bonfini was probably referring to the paternal ancestors of King Mátyás, but some people deliberately misinterpreted his writing, because our academic historians explain this as Bonfini must have been wrong here as well, since Mátyás was born in Kolozsvár - Cluj, but here it is not about Mátyás and not even about Hunyadi János! No matter how we take it, Antonio Bonfini clearly describes that Mátyás took his second first name, Corvin, or Hollós in Hungarian, from the village, i.e. Hollós, from which his ancestors came! According to the unmistakable words of King László V's often mentioned 1453 certificate, Hunyadi's ancestors had the right to use a coat of arms thanks to the grace of the Hungarian kings! So this also strongly proves that they could not use their coat of arms starting with their father, but for much longer, probably for many centuries, which completely contradicts the fact that Hunyadi's father was Woyk! However, we do not know of the Woyk's family that they used any kind of coat of arms, at least no description of this has yet been found, so it is quite possible that they were really Cumans or Vlachs from Wallachia, who then disappeared in the storm of history, and may have been taken their property by Hunyadi János, and this is where the confusion comes from later! Because it is certain that already in the first half of the 15th century, Hunyadi became the owner of the entire county of Hunyad, which is already mentioned as Huniad in the 1256 papal charter! And the town and the earthen castle where the castle of the Hunyadis was later built, was mentioned as Hungnod and Huniad. And this is certainly a name with an ancient Hungarian meaning, which was already written down from the 13th century, but it is probably much older! And I am writing this only because the Romanians also falsified the origin of this name, because they say that it has always been Hunedoara, but it is certain that this did not mean anything in Romanian either, and the first Vlachs renamed this county and castle in their own language in a mirror translation! Anyway, it is now a genetically proven fact that the Hunyadi family could not have come from the Romanians, because they were able to take very good quality samples from the bones of King Matthias' son János Corvin and his minor child found in Lepoglava, Croatia! The samples belonging to the same main group as the Hunyadis from the Carpathian Basin are the following: an Avar sample (AD 650-675). A sample of a Hungarian elite soldier, conquest period (895-950 AD) (Neparáczki et al. 2019) and a sample of a medieval Hungarian noble (Nagy et al. 2021, Olasz et al. 2019). And all of this confirms Hunyadi's blood relationship with the Verebélyi's family! But I ask, about which these scoundrel historians are deeply silent, where are the graves of Woyk and his family? Because if the graves of Hunyadi and his son László are there in the Archbishop's Cathedral of Gyulafehérvár, then at least the graves of his father and mother should be somewhere nearby, right? But no one knows anything about them, not even his mother, and this can only be explained by the fact that it was because they were from Verebélyi blood, and they really have their graves, and moreover, sarcophags similar to Hunyadi's, and the raven is also on them!

[@thieph]

@@Ταργιτάος1 acording to real data in your imagination, stinky troll🤣

[@microbus432]

​@@thiephwhy did the romanians tore down Màtyàs's statue in Kolozsvàr (Cluj) in 1919???

[@sierraleonediamondexplorat2080]

His ancestry is known, he was a Romanian nobleman from Transylvania. Why the BS story about his ancestry?

[@steveditchburn5887]

Interesting story but what an unfortunate voice!!!

[@historyprofiles]

@@steveditchburn5887 I’m so sorry! I can’t change it!

[@steveditchburn5887]

@@historyprofiles Forgive me but sometimes you have to get someone else to do the presenting - years ago I was forced (by the company I was working for) to watch a documentary on the idea of 'zero defects' in Computing. The funny thing was that the American guy who gave the video presentation had a speech defect which made one wonder why he hadn't employed someone to give the message. I'm sure you know many colleagues who would read your fine detailed text.

[@yllbardh]

@@steveditchburn5887 it is much, much better than using AI voice.

[@steveditchburn5887]

@@yllbardh Not suggesting you use AI, just suggesting you find a friend / colleague who has a good voice for presentation - I don't want to cause you extra expense - but if you really wish to improve your product a good presentation voice is paramount.

[@nathanruben3372]

Hunyadi is not a hero but a coward bastard. He ditched his men two times in varna and in second kosovo battles and fled the battlefiled sneakily and left the coalition army in varna, and his own infantry in kosovo to be butchered by Ottomans next day.

[@jym22jym22]

It was NOT cowardice, it was all according to plan AND only some of the common soldiers were slaughtered, most were enslaved or settled in remote parts of the empire while the noblemen were usually ransomed back for a handsome price although some "died in captivity" (pledged loyalty to the Sultan, married local women, abandoned their families back home and became Ottomans) . It was all done to promote modern values of multiculturalism and genetic diversity.

[@BTL6666]

@@jym22jym22 hahahhaha ...true enough but....to promote values of multiculturalism and genetic diversity??? hahahhahahah....they were afraid not to be killed there and accepted Islam in the end...they were never thinking of multiculturalism...hahahhaha...good joke mate!

[@nathanruben3372]

@@jym22jym22 I have no idea what are talking about!

[@ac_pejk3113]

Why do westerners use despitism or despot as somewhat as derogative today ?

[@BTL6666]

because they do not the true meaning of the word despot :))

[@vassabatielos4740]

He also makes good cars

[@Pajserbrigada]

Its Smederevo not Sendri

[@peterbalogh8138]

Szendrő.

[@denzilessy253]

3 different pictures of 1 man, 🙄😂 narrative off this programme is half baked information...Lies again..European history always leaves out the fact alot of Knights were Moors..this dude shown pictures of different people..

[@historyprofiles]

@@denzilessy253 a lot of different artists have drawn him? So I showed all the images of him? What points in the video were lies?