The ultimate Red Bull car design explained

[@RANDOMZBOSSMAN1]

We need to see this car around James May favourite track of all time lmao I wonder how close it would get to the 919Evo An awesome looking car and love the technology used

[@carguy7627]

I love the idea of a car without worrying about regulations. Granted it's track only, but I am still glad it exists even if I will never be in a position to even see one. I saw a comment below about the car being for the rich only - so what? Rich people exist.

[@Jtheman497]

This feels like an Ai written and produced video.

[@jacksonhavens3317]

i agree, i couldn’t put my finger on it

[@fourss00]

just in time for lunch 😎

[@thatguyjef2402]

Same

[@rockypiccio4100]

So wait this uses a venturi tunnel like the rb18 so in someway... This is somehow a loophole in the rules that they can design the fundamentals of the car especially the suspension before they are allowed to 🤔

[@walterb108]

Is it possible that red bull gained a advantage on ground effect by working on this car without any restrictions?

[@benji928]

You CANNOT claim your car can race for a full 24hours without actually doing it, that was literally why Le mans was started. Believe it when it finishes the race.

[@degenelatepeppeloni9854]

Hope we see this car in LeMans

[@jaunedroite]

We won't. As they say in the video, it's not built according to LeMans or F1 regulations. There's no category for it to race.

[@Ancovg]

As said in the video, the car would be illegal. 4:28

[@degenelatepeppeloni9854]

@@jaunedroite the word is 'Hope'

[@iamthedrumandbassfarmer8735]

Like hell will they make the RB17 into a Hypercar. Because if they do it'll be a wholly unique car that happens to have the same name and vaguely similar appearance like the Valkyrie LMH.

[@Milkydrummer]

There should be no car faster round a track than an F1 car. NOTHING. It’s a sorry state of affairs when there is. F1 needs to look at itself hard.

[@Lora_Beolab]

why?, the fastest cars don't automatically make for good racing, f1 should fix it's racing problems first

[@superxavxii421]

​@@Lora_Beolab This 👆🏿

[@omarhall1610]

Newey designed a car similar to this back in 2010, I think, for the Gran Turismo game but it looked even cooler

[@Gamingwithrayan1]

Can't wait for RB to do a RB Move and make it race against one of their F1 Cars

[@richardkoit2017]

Last

[@garf117]

150KG is 330LB 900KG is 2000LB 1700KG is 3750LB For those who need it in freedom units

[@Shadowboost]

Meanwhile Sendy Club Manta will be less than 500 kg and 1000 hp

[@shades29045]

Can this elegant machine please be put in forza motorsport

[@MuhammadNiz007]

It's already been proved that it can't beat an F1 car

[@ThatOneIdiot-ue4ow]

FIRST

[@welles28]

So - the RB17 is not street legal, and it does not conform to the regs of any existing race series. Apart from separating rich idiots from their money, what is this car for?

[@ConfusingGameplay]

Fun mainly

[@aceofaces1506]

It’s fun. And it’s cool, that’s it

[@geirmyrvagnes8718]

For driving fast and selling carbonated and caffeinated sugar water.

[@m1st87]

most likely to develop tech for f1 without it counting towards the cost cap or wind tunnel test time.

[@DuvJones]

Actually it does conform to ONE regulation.... The FIA's Hypercar safety regulations. That is it. "Apart from separating rich idiots from their money, what is this car for?" Honestly, that might be the point here because unless they attempt to take this racing (which they can't without heavy modifications), their is no other point aside from putting it in someone's collection only to gather dust.

[@alexeimscruz2893]

As a road car to run against the likes of Astons, Ferrari, and McLaren, this doesn't make sense on public roads with congestion and potholes... and for money-wielding rappers, influencers, and others who are unskilled in handling this high-performance beast, they'll just wrap it to the nearest tree or post at the first jab of the throttle...

[@Uranswer-yu5kp]

Absolutely worthless car. You can’t legally drive it on the streets and it doesn’t conform to many tracks. What are you gonna do? Buy it and park it so you can look at it?

[@eoincassin4265]

You should have just commented "I'm angry because I can't afford it." Do you say every car you can't afford is worthless?? 😂

[@Uranswer-yu5kp]

@@eoincassin4265 lol I retired at age 49 friend. Im sure you can say the same right? Not being able to afford this car isn’t the point. Great feat of engineering that all you can do is look at it. If you can’t see that then you’re just a blind fan boy.

[@eoincassin4265]

@@Uranswer-yu5kp no I cant say the same. Im not 49 🤣 Im not a fan boy at all. But if I have the money to buy that car, i have the money to bring it to a track where i can drive it. Why are you such a sad little cunt if you take such pride at retiring at 49?? Maybe you should enjoy life more and stop being such a pathetic little boy

[@CamPerry93]

Can we stop with these ugly future looking cars,its not appealing whatsoever and looks like it came from a 90s racing game

[@thunderkilla1807]

Aerodynamics determine how the car looks more than just styling