The UNARGUABLE Defense of the KJV | PROOF TEXT! | Dr. peter S. Ruckman

This video focuses on just ONE question from a much longer video.
You can see the whole video here:
Part01: • Peter S. Ruckman - Q &...
Part02: • Peter S. Ruckman - Q &...
Make sure to give a like and a follow.
I have cleaned up the audio and added verses to match the teaching.
I hope you find this a blessing.

[@Mark-s7d6l]

I have tried to find something that Peter Ruckman said that I could fault using the KJV. or any respected translation. So far, I have not found anything this mam has said that I can criticise using the Bible as evidence he is wrong. If you don't like him, that's your problem.

[@jayne2499]

Praise the Lord for His wonderful words of truth and wisdom and instruction and understanding and life!!!!!!

[@biblebaptisttruthtube]

Praise God for the KJV

[@s1988teve]

I thank God He opened my eyes to the truth of His Bible. The King James Bible. I believe every word printed on those pages, no corrections needed.

[@davescrimshaw7781]

you obviously have not read the textus receptus in Greek (other wise u wouldn't say that)

[@johnnyvans_77]

KJV IS THE PURE WORD OF GOD IM A FILIPINO AND TAGALOG BIBLE IS CORRUPTED AND GOD LEAD ME TO READ KJV BIBLE I BELIEVE THAT GOD USE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TO PRESERVE HIS WORD BECAUSE ENGLISH LANGUAGE IS THE MOST SPOKEN UNIVERSAL LANGUAGE OF THIS WORLD EVEN ANY NATIONALITY READ KJV BIBLE BACAUSE KJV BIBLE IS PURE WORD PRAISE LORD JESUS CHRIST FOR HIS REVEAL TRUTH PRESERVE PURE WORD, KJV IS MATHEMATICAL PERFECTION AND WITHOUT ERROR, KJV AROUND THE WORLD 🌍 🙌✝️🔥🇮🇱🇺🇸🇵🇭🇹🇭🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇹🇬🇺🇿🇻🇪🇬🇧🇿🇲🇻🇺🇸🇪🇪🇭🇿🇼🇸🇩🇹🇷🇹🇱

[@camerashy474]

I was 18 years old, saved, and truly desired to learn more of scripture. That was 1985. I had an NIV my mother gave me, and while reading the footnotes, I noticed the constant references made to Vaticanus. I knew at that time that the Vatican was an evil organization. The Lord leaned over my shoulder and said that something was not right. I went away to school and found a church to attend while receiving an education. One night,a deacon handed me a number of study tapes of Matthew by Dr. Ruckman. The rest is wonderful history. I had my faith restored in God's Holy Book, the KJV. I'm a spoiled sheep grazing on the hills of plenty.

[@carlosarce6352]

Peter RUCKMAN Rocks, boy!

[@madsaez]

Wow! what a book! It’s almost like God wrote it! Thank you Job! Job 19:23-25 KJVS [23] Oh that my words were now written! oh that they were printed in a book! [24] That they were graven with an iron pen and lead in the rock for ever! [25] For I know that my redeemer liveth, and that he shall stand at the latter day upon the earth:

[@privatepilot4064]

Time is short, death is sure, sin the curse, Christ the Cure! 1 Corinthians 15:1 “Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:”

[@robusc4940]

Yes, 1 Cor 15:1-4 is the Gospel that applies to you & I today. "believed in vain" is a concern though. Do believers need to continue believing to remain saved ? No of works etc , correct but what if a believer stops believing ?

[@privatepilot4064]

@@robusc4940 If you were born can you be unborn? John 3:6 “That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.” If you believed in vain then you didn’t really believe. The Gospel is simple. 2 Corinthians 11:3 “But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.” Once you are born you will always be, whether you no longer believe it or not. You will always be your mom’s child no matter what.

[@robusc4940]

@@privatepilot4064 What = really believe ? eg Paul teaches and I understand believe that I am justified/saved/forgiven of all my sin because I only place my faith/trust in the death/burial/resurrection of Christ to do that. But does a believer that believes remain saved if they later stop believing ? I would have thought no but Eph 1:13 - sealed implies yes, remains saved regardless.

[@privatepilot4064]

@@robusc4940 I agree. With regards to losing your salvation by no longer believing I don’t believe that is possible. If you were sincere and believed when you had initially gotten saved you were born into Gods Family. Now if we compare natural birth with spiritual birth as Jesus did in John 3:6 “That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.”, then you will always be your mother’s child, we will always be Gods child. Nothing can change your kinship with your mom, likewise nothing can change your kinship with God. Our kinship and relationship are two separate issues. I might despise my mom or have a poor relationship with her, however, it doesn’t change the fact that I’m her son. The same when we’re born into the family of God.

[@privatepilot4064]

Time is short, death is sure, sin the curse, Christ the Cure! 1 Corinthians 15:1 “Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:” Looking up!

[@larrynelson3329]

Amen so good. Thank you for posting

[@kevinclint7588]

ONE OF THE BEST PREACHERS EVER,…………. PRAISE GOD,……….. AMEN TO THAT

[@Ali.Bruni143]

Amen!!

[@gennaro13]

I have an argument against it. I don't understand early modern English.

[@josephphillips590]

That your problem.

[@Hummingbird-fv1mj]

Pray and ask God for understanding. Psalms 119: 144, 169

[@Hummingbird-fv1mj]

Pray and ask God for understanding. Psalms 119:144, 169

[@davescrimshaw7781]

Acts 12:4 (KJV) And when he had apprehended him, he put him in prison, and delivered him to four quaternions of soldiers to keep him; intending after Easter to bring him forth to the people. THE PROBLEM IS: 1) Easter is a pagan babylonian word; 2) The greek text actually is: 12:4 ὃν καὶ πιάσας ἔθετο εἰς φυλακήν παραδοὺς τέσσαρσιν τετραδίοις στρατιωτῶν φυλάσσειν αὐτόν βουλόμενος μετὰ τὸ πάσχα ἀναγαγεῖν αὐτὸν τῷ λαῷ --- PASXA = passover. There are many other mis-translations & misrepresentations in the KJV. King James was referred to as "queen james" behind his back. He also practiced beastiality. In addition, he forbade conservative scholars to have any input on the final "authorized" version. As Dr. Phil would ask, "How's that working for you?"

[@LastCall777]

When no one has anything good to say they attack the character of a person. It's sad someone as old as you still hasn't grown up. King James wasn't a homosexual, nor did he practice beastiality. He was one of the greatest monarchs England ever had, uniting Scotland and England and forming the foundations of the British Empire, while simultaneously putting the words of God in the hands of the common folk. He certainly had a lot of enemies because of that, Anthony Weldon being one of them who waited until after the king was dead and unable to defend himself to bring about such accusations which grown men like you flocked to. And as for your word "Easter" that's exactly why the KJV translators translated it that way. What, you thought they didn't know it was a babylonian word? Out of the 29 times they translated Pashca as Passover you think they hadn't discussed and studied the thing out for the one time they translated it as Easter? The word COULDN'T be translated as PASSOVER in that verse because the Passover had already passed. They were referring to the festivities the ROMAN Herod was celebrating, not the Jews. Translating it as passover would have been a mistake. So, what else you got? These are baby attempts at discrediting God's words. A grown man like yourself must have something more than that up your sleeve.

[@davescrimshaw7781]

@@LastCall777 Look who is attacking! I am an History major, taught in both Christian and public schools. You CLEARLY have not studied History or know anything about the translation process of the "authorized" version. I come from Pilgrim stock, who used the Geneva Bible. Queen James hated the Pilgrims as well as the Geneva Bible. Why? He had fallen under the influence of Catholic duke of Lennox who wanted to get Scotland back under Mary Queen of Scotts. James was kidnapped by Wm. Ruthven and forced to denounce Lennox.

[@LastCall777]

@@davescrimshaw7781 yeah thought so. You’d have to be educated to be so nutty. Like all those smart educated folks out in the streets cheering for Hamas. Doc was educated too. You know what he called his PHD? A post hole digger. That’s how much he thought of his certifications. That’s why he never used it to defend his stance, he brought logic and facts to his argument, not certificates.

[@davescrimshaw7781]

@@LastCall777 I gave you the facts - apparently ur too unlearned to understand - I have been born again since 1972 - i will not respond again - you'll want the last word anyhow.

[@LastCall777]

@@davescrimshaw7781 You gave me no facts and you like your own comments. Says everything anyone needs to know.

[@norsaken9945]

KJVPictures, I love your other channel, but surely you must see that this is not good logic for KJV-only. 1. Because the founders of this country had access to King James Bibles, that translation is responsible for our "greatness". Most of our founders were not Christian, and in fact believed God abandoned this Earth after making it, as was a popular belief at the time. Besides, America and England are pits of depravity like anywhere else, and neither the countries nor their figures should be idolized. 2. Because all our measurements come from England, why not our Bibles? That's just dumb. Since Britain now uses the metric system, why not go with a revised English Bible, then? 3. Because a bunch of famous American figures praised the Bible in general when the KJV was the most popular (not the only) English translation, those praises apply specifically to the KJV. This is just obviously not true. These praises are for the Bible itself, not the KJV specifically. I have to say, this is far from inarguable, and is a bad first impression for Ruckman. Please don't worship the KJV to the point where you throw reason and the power of God to use all translations out the window. Some translations are better than others, but the Word does not depend on a KJV stamp or old-fashioned grammar to be accurate. Gonna go watch your Verses video now to see how that goes. Also, to anyone reading this, take what I'm about to say with a grain of salt, but Ruckman had better be talking about coed integration and not racial integration as an example of bad fruit.

[@LastCall777]

I really couldn’t care less if you like or dislike any of my channels. This is ONE of many arguments and I post them as they come. You want more arguments from doc, then search the channel. You’ll find them.

[@SonnyGuillory]

Get out of that HIV you've been reading buddy, get back to the KJB!!! And yes one of the bad fruits was the mixing of cultures was never supposed to happen read Gen 11 for more

[@edwindalumpines8784]

Don't worship scholars my friend.

[@SimplyProtestantBibleBeliever]

​@@LastCall777 Brother, this comment has nothing to do with any of your channels, it has to do with "surely you must see that this is not good logic for KJV-only": argumentation that makes no sense, and does disservice and undercuts our defense of the AV as supreme. Dr. Ruckman taught us to not simply take him at his word but check him with scripture and logic, and these arguments go against all logic as the comment above demonstrated.

[@LastCall777]

@@SimplyProtestantBibleBeliever I’m not going to censor Dr.Ruckman because of the way you feel. Even if I were to disagree with him, maybe someone else sees it his way, maybe I will too in the future. This channel isn’t about screening him, it’s about making his arguments easy to find, for other’s sake and I couldn’t care less if you agree or disagree with that. I’m sure you have plenty of criticisms. It’s easy to criticize others. But I like what I’m doing better than what you’re not doing. Good day.