The universe is too big to contain itself | Lee Cronin and Lex Fridman

[@LexClips]

Full podcast episode: kzbin.info/www/bejne/eXjMdaSeiMl_fs0 Lex Fridman podcast channel: kzbin.info Guest bio: Lee Cronin is a chemist at University of Glasgow.

[@craigfitzpatrick1663]

One throwaway line stood out for me as quite a laudable way to look at things: “Oh course I’m wrong… But *how* wrong?”

[@nicholasobrien5914]

I like this especially in relation to the idea that red shift characterized as increasing spatial distance between stars and galaxies is actually caused by ' the universe being too big for itself' and actually being caused by the volume of time/space becoming larger and in relation to a non-deterministic field, time.

[@PrecioustheMovie1]

Cronin totally jumped off the rails with this one. You don’t need determinism to have a lack of free will. The point to the lack of free will argument is that choices are downstream of causes that aren’t in the control of an “agent” so the agent isn’t in control of their choices. Whether the causes are deterministic or random isn’t relevant to the argument. Cause and effect logically leads to a lack of free will.

[@matt984]

I think what he is trying to express is that if the universe is limited in size so that it’s impossible to contain the data of the future than free will must exist because the future is novel.

[@manofcultura]

I think you’re conflating free will with omnipotence.

[@matt984]

@@MarcioSouza1 because then you create novelty.

[@PrecioustheMovie1]

@@manofcultura instead of thinking I must be confused about these concepts because my conclusions don’t align with your own, try thinking something like “what must he be thinking to have come to the conclusion he did?” And I made it easy for you by writing down what I was thinking.

[@juzefzoozoo]

Lee is all over the place. Should establish one idea at a time.

[@djannias]

🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation: 00:03 🤔 *The universe is too big to contain itself, leading to a discussion about the nature of time.* 01:22 🌌 *Newtonian mechanics and the uncertainty principle's impact on determinism in the universe.* 02:36 🔍 *The challenge of storing coordinates to infinite precision for finite objects.* 03:16 🕰️ *Time is non-deterministic due to the inability to predict the future with sufficient precision.* 05:21 🧠 *The discussion shifts to free will and its relationship with the fundamentality of time.* 06:31 🧪 *Assembly Theory's role in explaining the transition from deterministic to creative time.* 08:10 🔄 *Life is described as a "novelty miner" from the future, actualized in the present.* 10:58 🎲 *A debate on randomness, determinism, and the role of constrained opportunity in generating novelty.* 13:16 🌌 *The idea that the future is bigger than the past challenges traditional conceptions of the universe.* Made with HARPA AI

[@GhoodVibez]

Props to Lex for not taking such an extreme leap from statements made.

[@vagabondcaleb8915]

Are you saying the universe is NOT expanding?

[@babak4879]

what do you mean?

[@GhoodVibez]

I felt like the guy came with a lot of authority with his comments and basically his argument wasn’t quite enough to make the leap. Lex was like okay, I kinda see where you’re coming from but not quite to the extent of me making a leap simply based offf what and how you said something.

[@GhoodVibez]

His comments didn’t make me see his way. Just cause he was so matter of fact this is how it is cause of how it is. Lex was trying to get there but like me, needed more than just saying some shit.

[@joeperez1317]

​@Stunrickrollownage I hope you believe in sciene and not mythological bs

[@cmedeir]

Someone needs to explain to me WHY we are trying to store numbers in a golf ball. Sense. It makes none.

[@6stringstrat520]

my brain hurts....

[@anubis4496]

Fr 😂

[@BlackPowerRanger1112]

😂

[@oliverjamito9902]

Why thy brain hurts? Liken to pinch thy skin! Remember hurts DON'T RECOGNIZE COLORS! Students, will say, remember all colors is THE OLIVER JAMITO BORN DECEMBER 29 1976 SIGNITURE! The New Day. Remember if creation itself can't exist in front! Without being desired 1st! Now here ye ALL ARE in FRONT! Who have desired all THY LIVES 1ST? I'll wait right Here. Who love with patience, mercy, and grace! Judgment and Justice is HIS THRONE! Washers of feet of neighbors and wiping their tears from their eyes! Likewise humble to....?

[@CJKilo21]

@@oliverjamito9902dude that was deep

[@ianrowland463]

It’s growing

[@ErikGarcia07]

“How do you store an infinitely long number in a finite size?” For instance, there is an infinity of fractional numbers between 0 and 1.

[@thelotus3]

😮

[@TonyMarselle]

@@Chronic-ASAP105-cx4gmI think you are incorrect m.

[@Chronic-ASAP105-cx4gm]

@@TonyMarselle Yeah well that is why you are always thinking wrong about life's secrets.. NASA 101 for dummies: 1) They count down because they know the Cosmo's comes with rules. (1) is new/beginning and (9) is old/original. 2) They know 4, 3, 2, 1 exist vs 1-10. Zero's do not exist.

[@dmitryalexandersamoilov]

@@Chronic-ASAP105-cx4gm this sounds like Truth GPT lol

[@omarabbasi2682]

That’s not true infinity it’s only conceptual. There has to be a smallest point which makes up every thing else.

[@jasonbailey2493]

i wish i could understand what this dude is saying. he may be brilliant.

[@Mooja12]

I don't think it's you.

[@theabjectfailure]

Does the object necessarily have to contain its coordinates, or is that recorded in the universe, but tied to the object? The latter implies that the universe must get bigger as the number of items (black holes excluded, items fragment over time, therefore multiplying the unique object count) increases, this would compound the increase that accompanies the implication that Lee makes, that the universe must increase in size to encompass its increase in complexity over time. I'm not convinced that position is a property contained by the object, rather that it is a property of spacetime. Another problem I'm bothered by, is reconciling infinite precision, with the planck length. Just thinking out loud here, I'm actually sold on the concept of time being fundamental, just nitpicking.

[@Chronic-ASAP105-cx4gm]

I can tell lol. Your word salad full of nothing won't get you anywhere near the truth. Trust me, the truth about what universe we live in, dimensions etc is all out there. Which is why what you say here is just nonsense. Diminishing time is a huge mistake. Everyone meaning spirits have biological clocks inside them in the form of sacred geometry. It's either you know or you don't, the odds that you will be able to talk yourself through this is slim. Listening to people like this when you don't have a grasp will fuck you up. It's like reading a Bible but not knowing what any of the numbers mean besides page numbers & chapters.

[@florentraffray1073]

in some sense, for the argument he's making it doesn't matter too much whether the coordinates are stored in the object or the universe. I think the point is for any given reaction between any two particles you would need infinite amounts of data for it to be precisely calculated in a deterministic way because coordinates require real numbers and real numbers by definition necessitate infinite data after the decimal point or infinite precision. The kind of data that would be required to actually reverse chemical reactions, i.e. reverse time can only exist as a mathematical abstraction because it necessitates being able to encode infinite amounts of precision. And, if you agree with this then it follows that reactions can only ever generate novel states, and nothing can ever return to how it precisely was before. But then there is one more subtlety in it, and that's that there are still physical laws, and so as such you end up with a world that looks deterministic looking backward, but that is generating novelty going forward. For as much as it makes sense to me as I reflect on this sometimes, it also at other times seems almost absurd but that's kinda how it goes as you get closer and closer to trying to define the fundamental nature of the universe. But I do find what Lee is saying to be of sound logic and it provides an elegant way to explain an intuition we all have, that the universe has rules but is something more than just a set of dominos falling down one after the other.

[@Rich7714]

What's all that talk about taxis at 15:20? I'm confused 🤔😕

[@raynat5280]

My mind just got fed for a long time....I have been pondering these things consistently. Thank you.

[@Wolfci]

Someone talking about the universe is like a ant explaining the earth to other ants

[@coolio227722]

Life is a novelty miner from the future. . . What a statement

[@florentraffray1073]

I think what Lee is saying at the core is simply that no particle's position can be perfectly calculated unless you have infinite precision. The rest of what he says follows from this. This is a commonly accepted thing in math, the set of real numbers necessitates that any number can have infinite decimals after the decimal point. It's something we sort of intuitively accept, that if you move from a position of 0 to a position of 1 then along the way some of the positions you'd find yourself in would have infinitely long amounts of decimals, i.e. 0.3673023967.... So that's what he means when he says you would need infinite precision to be able to predict or calculate what is going to happen next, but that's not information that the universe can store. Things are finite, there is no way to store and thus to reproduce an infinitely precise measurement. So we have, according to Lee, a universe of precise rules and finite objects but operating with unstorable infinite measurements. It's why it looks deterministic looking back, and forever novel looking forward. Nothing can be predicted, and nothing can be undone. Only novelty is ever possible. That's my understanding anyways, and from there that's where you get to this idea that time is fundamental, it's in the sense that no chemical reaction can ever be undone because the universal is constantly generating novelty, new positions for every atom with infinite, unmeasurable, unstorable precision. I found what he was saying so interesting that I went and watched a video of the mathematician he said inspired him as of late, Nicolas Gisin, where he explains intuitionistic mathematics which seems to be what is inspiring Lee with this perspective. If you find this stuff interesting then I highly recommend: kzbin.info/www/bejne/jYWTiXeJmpV6r7s

[@clementdato6328]

Modern AI seems to manifest that creativity is a patchwork of past knowledge, where arguably the patching shall count as the novel part. But the patching does not require a fundamental randomness, but just a randomness up to certain scale, under which it may well be implemented by a deterministic mechanism

[@Chronic-ASAP105-cx4gm]

That's when you have to decide what to believe in. It's a gut check for believers or none believers. You are two things if you made it to earth. 1) A spirit that ended up getting stuck here because once you die on earth, you keep coming back as a newborn with a bleached past. 2) You where a moon baby that could have been here since the 1700-1800s. Anyone born between 1950-mid 90s are spirit's from the Cosmos. The kids or new generation of 9-10 to 18-19 yr olds are technically old souls. This is why they are so retro filled, they have a connection of old America.

[@timangar9771]

​@@Chronic-ASAP105-cx4gm Do I... do I have a third option? Please?

[@Chronic-ASAP105-cx4gm]

@@timangar9771 Nope. Sorry it doesn't work that way. If you where born between 1997-2000s or especially early 2010s, you have been here for awhile, stuck down here. Annunaki's Gods are being born as newborns in crappy slums across America, it was designed for those reasons, humans just caught the side effects of that spiritual warfare. When you die, your spirit has 8/10 mission to walk into that briy light which is just the dark side of the Moon. You blink and before you know it, your coming back out into the same light but this time it's reality and to a doctor that you can meet later on as a child.... If you're lucky!! If you are lucky than you could always get presented this dark light which is just your conscience not being turned on yet, like a dark room without any lights. It's technically portal to what they lied about that Heaven was supposed to be like, this is a Oasis though. It's at the edge of this universe and it's the Annunaki's constellation called Sirius Star system or planet X. There's a 9/10 though you won't get that option and instead you will just fulfill the true moral message behind "hell on earth". You just keep coming back with a bleach past. Newborn, new family. If lucky, you meet the people you love from your past life in your new life on earth. This is where the series like the Mummy and the Matrix got there ideas of finding our loved ones in a "new life".

[@yasseford]

"I'm making this up as I go along" yeah no shit. God I still await an explanation of free will that isn't randomness

[@rezadaneshi]

How unscientifically poetic. Space is infinite but matter’s infinite complexity is finite and the arrow of time will switch directions toward infinite symmetry and again a Big Bang like event sparks the next pulse in a cyclical universe. If you don’t believe that, believe this, That only if matter was infinite, universe would be too big to contain itself.

[@keithmccann6601]

So I just keep thinking about this intensely thought provoking subject and now......... I’m thinking about it in the context of GR vs QM and the difficulty of uniting those theories into a single ‘theory of everything’ - and so it occurs to me now, that that might not be possible at all - GR is classical, testable, predictable, empirical and very definitely right - QM, on the other hand, is essentially probabilistic, prone to all sorts of illogical, random and counterintuitive ‘roulette-like’ behaviour but also very definitely right!!! - So, what if GR actually only describes everything that ‘exists’; the ‘here-and-now’ and all of history so far but not the future? - And what if, down at the quantum scale, we are witnessing our entire reality in the process of creation? - what if our reality is created and unfolds before us (with us) second by second, nanosecond by nanosecond, Planck time by Planck time……..? Then, of course, that would be probabilistic because it hasn’t quite happened yet!!! - those dice are still rolling!!! - none of us knows what’s coming tomorrow (or next nanosecond) - What else would you expect? We might be looking at the very leading edge of creation and the very frontier of time itself - the now point - the boundary between what was and what will be…………

[@zimmermanlandscape9287]

A golf ball couldn’t even move if there was no time huh?

[@keithmccann6601]

@@zimmermanlandscape9287 i think you missed the point - the golf ball would not exist in a massless universe because it's massive - but as soon as it does exist its very presence, as 'slower stuff' (matter) provokes that 'speed differential' and creates 'time' and 'space' - i know this is not at-all intuitive - try re-reading what i said :)

[@keithmccann6601]

@@splinterz5744 really good question!!! - i think it's the same reason that 'inflation' seems to have broken the speed of light limit many times over right at the start - and that's because 'time' did not exist so any growth however huge took no time at all - or, put another way the laws of physics didn't apply at that very early [moment] - but that super-luminal expansion meant rapid cooling as well and that caused the first 'matter' to condense and at that point 'time' and 'space' come into being and then gravity and then we get the laws of physics once all those ingredients are established - obviously no one yet really knows exactly what happened at the epoch so we are really discussing my own conjecture - no more or less likely than anything else though given the lack of empirical evidence :)

[@Jacobk-g7r]

I’m throw a thought to you guys. What if the quantum isn’t fundamental. Imagine the Big Bang made planets and mixtures but over the mixtures friction caused quantum in spots but others haven’t broke down that small or the environment resists changes or lacks energy. Imagine a planet that does have the quantum but it’s not quantum yet and still solidly connected and resistant to change. The sun is like the water beating on the rock and slowly sawing it in half. The sun is shining its energy on and into us which connects with certain things and creates changes that we interpret as blinding and we shift back or it shines in the medium and hits things and transfers energy and then that thing or group of things goes into a different environment or changes the environment and that shift leads to many more cascading changes and growths. The breakdown allows for complexity and the constant flow of energy means it’s only a matter of when and where like coordinates in space and time. We are like physical coordinates that connect to the previous and can create the future.

[@Jacobk-g7r]

Oh but yeah it’s like a heart beat or positive and negative feedback loops and these loops evolve and are guided by those changes/growths. It’s hard to explain this without the images in mind. Look at the patterns. Like take a step back pull out the connect the dots paper and use it as a lens to see the connections in reality kinda like looking at chemical structures or biological structures and processes. The energy is broken down into various forms as well so we can branch out and grow diverse but still efficiently so we don’t outgrow the resources or outgrow our planet and maybe even reality. I mean look at how we take pieces physically out of trees to make a chair and that chair never existed before but it did in the patterns of reality and we saw the patterns in our head because they were grown and then we reconstructed it in the other mediums. Simulations are kinda like different realities connected to you by your manipulation and choices even though it’s not THE reality, it’s a version we use our senses to interact with.

[@danielkrall6501]

This one was hard to follow.

[@KingTheseus3]

Wtf? Determinism is only relevant to accurately predicting the future given knows. So how does “determinism exists looking into the past” make any sense? All this does is inform you that a given state transition was possible, not prove that it could have been predicted…?

[@Jacobk-g7r]

When he says the universe is too big to contain itself i think he means like how a cell isn’t everything else but can connect to everything else. Also like sound and words. It’s not that the universe has so much it can’t fit at all but it’s so big with potentials that it all can’t fit at once or that “once” could actually all of time then it would but wouldn’t to us.

[@michaelmashburn6068]

Sounds interesting, but some people don't understand how to explain things so that others can understand

[@matureyoungman]

he's so adorable lol "constrained opportunity"

[@datboi_gee]

I'd argue time is fundamental to consciousness and energy, period. Time is the vehicle through which change occurs. The transformation of energy between two states necessitates both states existing at different positions in time. Hence the transformation, or traversal between the states. To even perceive anything at all, that transformation is a fundamental necessity. In the same way that the concept of light can not exist without the absence of light. Without change, there are no patterns to recognize. Nothing to perceive. There's no "thing" to observe.

[@tark8516]

Why does it have to be infinite precision? Maybe too big for us to ever calculate but doesn’t mean there’s not a finite amount of datapoints

[@florentraffray1073]

I think the point in intuitionistic mathematics, which is what he states inspired this line of thinking, is that there are things that can be too big to calculate period, for us and in the universe itself. My somewhat rudimentary understanding of it is if you imagine moving along from 0 to 1 on an x-axis for example, you have to encode infinite precision if you want to be able to say the movement from 0 to 1 is smooth. That's why in math the set of real numbers allows for infinite precision after the decimal point, you need to assume that to calculate formulas in the natural world. It's just a different conclusion of a somewhat obvious observation. The fact that we need to encode a mathematical abstraction of infinity into every number in the set of real numbers in order for math to work is a sign of something fundamental in the universe: that there is no law of the excluded middle, things can be true, false or undetermined.

[@slyktech1860]

I don't think time actually exists and there is just the present where we live. The past is just our collective memories of history within the present and the future is just our predictions of what may come to be in the present.

[@mrn8645]

''memories of history within the present'' - if only there was a way of measuring or chronologically ordering history using some form or concept!

[@axilmar254]

Positions in space can't have infinite precision, because that would mean infinite levels of aggregation. The universe can't have infinite levels of things, because then, assuming each change at one level takes some time to propagate to the next level, even the simplest change would take infinite time to propagate to all levels. Infinite precision also means infinite levels of energy, and we know that is not true.

[@Chronic-ASAP105-cx4gm]

@splinterz5744 if that's what you got from this video than you're being steered in the wrong direction.. Your hypothetical of 13 billion is bogus, pure nonsense for the folks who understand the true numerical galactic system. Zero's do not in fact exist, never will and never has, meaning 1-10 which helps fuel the mystery of "money". 11-19 exist and saying 13 is no different than saying the number three or 3. It could be 1304849303837292926282 which would still be in the 13th universe or 3rd universe, same thing. 3503102727292727 would still be a 13th universe or 3rd type of deal. You can't begin to make hypotheticals until you understand the Cosmo's numerical order. There's a reason why when NASA wants to count to ten they start with 4-3-2-1 or scientist never using 100% as a lingo because once again, zeros do not exist. There only there to make your heart skip when dealing with money. Or when you want to talk about AI/Bots which was why the Matrix series used them as serial codes.

[@dmitryalexandersamoilov]

except they do have infinite precision. and time is an illusion. the laws of physics cause the past and the future simultaneously. the laws of physics themselves are not caused by anything. they're a subset of all the latent spectrum of all possible structures. ez. :p

[@jameswilliamson1726]

Let's see if I understand the premise of the golf ball. The golf ball is a finite object which can't contain the infinite mathematical precision of its initial conditions. Yet, mathematical precision is measured as a series of numbers that is represented by man-made digits. What if the golf ball stores its information in an analog format? Can you measure the circumference of the golf ball to infinite precision? No, but that doesn't change the reality that the golf ball "contains" its exact circumference whether we can measure it or not. Ditto for all its other attributes. Don't project our human limitations onto the universe as if our lack of understanding defines it. You can't possibly say that "the universe isn't big enough to contain its own future." What you mean is: our understanding of the universe can't completely predict, and therefore contain, the future of the universe.

[@badgersontoast9351]

Yes, you are surely correct here. The universe is big enough to contain its future because it literally does and always has. We just do not understand or have the correct method of understanding currently?…

[@thelotus3]

Sometimes you just gotta humble yourself and press .75 speed on videos like this lol. Also, what happens when the future outgrows the universe?

[@Kueth417]

Helped big time haha

[@Chronic-ASAP105-cx4gm]

I come here to see and hear about the lies to fine tune the truth. I realized that the age of Aquarius has hit everyone differently since 2019-20. It sucks, you all should know at least what Universe we live in. Space is most definitely not expanding. The only numbers that exist in the Cosmos are 11-19 nothing before or after since zeros don't exist.

[@ConceptuallyExperimental]

Time is infinite the future can’t outgrow the universe because Time is infinite everything that can happen will happen

[@thelotus3]

@@Chronic-ASAP105-cx4gm your comment threads are a delight

[@Chronic-ASAP105-cx4gm]

@@thelotus3 Someone needs to bring esoteric knowledge to the table. I'm that person. You won't be slowing down videos of people trying to run down game on you.

[@richg2881]

lost in words.

[@marcosgarcia6436]

As him

[@BraxtonClarke]

"Of course I'm wrong, but how wrong"

[@Altres]

WhenI was a little child I used to feel bigger than I was. Maybe that was just the feeling of the future arriving.

[@Chronic-ASAP105-cx4gm]

Silly in a stupid naive kind of way. The Bible talks about it. Humans ancestors of the future coming constantly to this planet battling the Annunaki's Beings. Eventually the advanced ancestors of Humans ended up taking the first created humans (caveman) to this planet. The world doesn't revolve around you.

[@HeathenWays]

It has nothing to do with what he is talking about.

[@Chronic-ASAP105-cx4gm]

@@HeathenWays It's 99.9% of what he is saying here. My grift? Wtf is time if we can only name 7 days out of 365 days? Therefore what he is experiencing is even more bullshit with a slice of delusion on the side. That's how the government likes us, confused (like you rn).

[@Altres]

@@HeathenWays Does it need to?

[@gregoryarutyunyan5361]

This person is in the brink of awakening.

[@PrecioustheMovie1]

Worldviews can be part of the conditions that result in awakening, but to directly experience that experience is an illusion and you’re lost in a “dream world” would mean the destruction of whatever theoretical scaffolding it took to get you there. Buddha called it letting go of your beliefs without grasping for another belief. I’m very happy to see you thinking about these things! Please share your perspective on this if you feel like it ❤

[@justjaay1203]

Maybe we aren't meant to predict the future doesn't mean it isn't deterministic we have the illusion of free will and a non deterministic existence because it's necessary for survival.

[@levankhocholava7726]

Why your personal subjective present moment should be objective present moment.

[@badgersontoast9351]

Surely the initial conditions is the only thing to affect the future, it just cannot be predicted due to the amount of time between initial condition and infinite time? Thoughts?

[@vv4g]

This may be ridiculous but here me out. If there are sizes too small hold positional information in numbers, then there has to be a new way to calculate and represent objects of a certain size. Perhaps you could use a different number system, or perhaps something else all together. It seems like physical data can’t be accurately translated to numbers below a certain instances, think pi, repeating, etc. i wonder if there would be a way to represent them and colculate them special instead. Think of how neural nets get the job done in a physical esq setting

[@vv4g]

I wonder if you could somehow store data in a position in neural net and then have it be calculated with other coordinates in the net

[@Druss2012]

How do you store infinite precision inside of a finite object? An asteroid is not a calculator. Who is to say you cannot store infinite possibility inside of a finite object?

[@alexmangorove]

I don't see why the ball has to have infinite precision. Doesn't it only need enough precision for itself? Another point: if we're talking about the whole universe's influence on the ball, we're wrong to separate objects and should only talk about the universe itself, containing the ball and everything that influences it. Then we're not limited by the ball, but by the universe which could as well be infinite.

[@FlyDude]

We need infinite precision to predict anything useful. Like, looking at a full state and being able to say, from this state, carbon based life follows.

[@alexmangorove]

@@FlyDude not within the ball though

[@ConceptuallyExperimental]

Time is fundamental obviously

[@Godhead111]

the guest: ah yes, my years of extensive scientific research led me to the conclusion that the universe is really big lex fridman: amazing. never thought about it

[@nrght]

This guy thinks math is fundamental to the universe. No, math is a tool humans use to understand the universe. Objects don’t “store” information.

[@williammathis6044]

This guy is either off the charts intelligent and can’t communicate with normies, oooooooorrrrrr he is suffering from mental illness… I’m torn between which

[@Nojnasaam]

The universe is round

[@theotormon]

Why would an object need to store its own coordinates? Isn't that the universe's job?

[@mrn8645]

Just like why would you need to remember where you parked your car, isn't that the car park's job!

[@jimhofoss9982]

when we don’t understand how big the universe actually is, or how it functions, making assumptions on its sustainability is absurd.

[@fastsavannah7684]

Constrained oportunity - now that’s s Kantian statement.

[@vladimirrakonjac7763]

What if the small amount of indeterminism is breaking down with the only intelligent information that we call the soul. E.g. the soul's main Dekart's property as consciousness, is not accurate, what if the soul is the only information within the universe that has actual, not just the performance, rather than the actual choice?

[@CrowXiX]

Legalize Ranch

[@skilifavas4016]

- " Here's a newly found topic of discussion of physics married with philosophy. " - " Ok I dont believe it " 😅

[@WasabiJohn]

Constrained opportunity... Awesome discussion on an extremely complicated topic... Interesting angle/perspective on the universe... Prove him wrong...

[@anti506]

so i didn't understand is my watch going to the future ?

[@undergroundpublishing]

This is where a REALLY old phrase, "In him, we live and move and have our being," might become relevant. We still doing this, "anything but God" hypothesis?

[@Chronic-ASAP105-cx4gm]

Both parties won't be able to handle the truth. One side wants to know all the Sci-fi Galactic tales but will never open up the Bible. The other side is so tapped into this story that would expose what's happening- Jesus a ex Annunaki who stepped outside himself and turned on his own and Mankind. He plays many different parts due to mastering the Quantum Physics side of being everywhere at all times aka playing as God. The scriptures of Jacob's life who was Jesus as a teenager will expose this. He created the human race by splicing animal DNA. Jacob separation of flock from the sheep's was the warning signs. Jacob's ladder was what lead human's future ancestors back to earth. All page and chapter numbers will tell you what Alien race and what universe. The population in today's world is all embedded in this war. If you're human (European, Arab or Asian) you are a cast out from the 12 tribes aka you're apart of the last/lost tribe of Jacob. Who fled earth after he wrestled with a fellow Angel aka Annunaki and loss. Humans where created in spite to hurt the fabric of Carbon which is life.

[@paulleard8349]

The universe is containerless. Plan and simple.

[@Blueprint4Murder]

The basis of our time measurements is not universal literally. A inch is a inch universally where our measurements of time are based on structures unique to our solar system in this moment not unique to the universe. Unless you can explain the rotation of other planets in multiples of our own with commonality despite the solar system variations there is no universal power to measure and if there is we very likely have it wrong.

[@merocaine]

Language games

[@keithmccann6601]

But time is not fundamental - Okay, so just to pick-up where I left off - consider this - In a hypothetical universe without ‘matter’ you have only ‘massless’ things - so just photons - and since photons don’t experience either ‘time’ or ‘space’ - then, QED, - in that universe there is neither ‘time’ nor ‘space’ - that universe is dimensionless!!! - think about that - a dimensionless universe is neither big nor small nor anything at all - it has no measurable size at all…..!!! - you must introduce some slower stuff - ‘matter’ - to get a ‘relative speed differential’ and thereby give birth to the concepts of ‘time’ and 'space' (spacetime) - and it’s that ‘relative speed differential’ that pulls and warps the ‘fabric of spacetime’ and gives rise to ’gravity' - therefore: Energy - Mass - Time - Space - Gravity - in that order - (IMHO)

[@keithmccann6601]

@@splinterz5744 'time' is not fundamental - it is emergent - it does not exist before 'matter' - massless things (photons / EMR) do not experience either 'time' or 'space' - so at TBB there was only 'massless' energy - matter would come later as the universe expanded and cooled and time can only emerge after that because of that 'speed differential' that matter causes - hard to believe i know :)

[@keithmccann6601]

@@splinterz5744 they only need time if measured from our 3D+1T FoR - in their own FoR they are instantly everywhere and 'everywhen' - and right at the epoch there was no 3D+1T due to total absense of matter - it was a massless universe (as i keep saying) - that situation would not persist of course

[@kyledrevlo1962]

whoa, I need to save this statement. It merits some serious thought!@@keithmccann6601

[@JEEPINJUSTIN]

I was trying to follow did he just say that the energy lost from entropy is what dark matter is made of

[@lobohez7222]

Gender theories tranfered to physics

[@DR_RUFUS]

I have free will on a psychological level. Whether I got it on a quantum level is irrelevant and seems unlikely. It is a self reflection. Looking into quantum and relativistic physics in a quest for a 'true' free will seems desperate.

[@yashbutno]

Well, the universe IS expanding.

[@tyler_3679]

"of course im wrong, but how wrong?"

[@oskarngo9138]

Wait, Why do you need infinite precision if actual measurements are Not infinite...? Ie there are Plank distances; Plank Time; Plank mass; etc...? Also Precision and data length are Not the same thing.... Pi is represented by an infinite (decimal) number....but Pi itself is in a fixed; exact location; on the number line... So this guy is contradicting himself

[@Pharockgod]

a (Torus) is to Big to contain itself... wtf?

[@willosee]

I have two finance/economics degrees and I haven’t got a clue what he is talking about.

[@je25ff]

Dark energy/Dark matter must be some sort of mechanism to store historical data about everything, including position, speed, mass, etc. etc.

[@Chronic-ASAP105-cx4gm]

Carbon is the start of all life forms. They been lying to you that oxygen> when it's not and never have been. Carbon footprints can only be left by the Carbonated plant Base Being's called POC. They had the colorful people as ancestors that breathed in only hydrogen. When overload of oxygen got exposed here and took over the atmosphere. Oxidation formed in the colorful people that created a rust looking color aka POC. It was a spiritual war that needed to be brought through physical warfare. This is return is a gut-check for human race especially Caucasian's. You can't leave anything behind, you're not tapped into anything, no roots. This means nothing is technically being recorded by any generations of humans (European, Arab, Asian).. This means no white person would be in a Akashic record's which ever planet has, a digital holographic library. It will tell you where your spirit came from and what your job was supposed to be.

[@Adoubless]

Interesting idea.

[@badgersontoast9351]

I had to ask Siri so much throughout this video 😂

[@SB-wj6dw]

Just because we dont understand how something came to be...doesn't mean there wasn't an appropriate cause. I really like these conversations, though.

[@bretnetherton9273]

Awareness is known by awareness alone.

[@Codeman20]

The future is what you make of it.😎

[@Adoubless]

I think my 3rd grade teacher told me this.

[@Codeman20]

😂See! You learn everything you need to know by the 3rd grade!

[@tangerum5883]

Lee is very........determined.

[@pay_it_forward_franklin4469]

#peace Per, Quantum-Mechanix; the Universe itself is in the Superposition of both "too big to contain itself" & too small to not be of the principlez of bein contained itself i.e. Infinite. He is right about-that per, Observation #barnone

[@pay_it_forward_franklin4469]

#sidebar plus based-on Dr. Gabriel Audu Oyibo Peer-reviewed Theorem; the Universe is not expanding

[@Chronic-ASAP105-cx4gm]

Wtf does peace mean?? The most oldest tribes across the African, Latino and Native American culture would eat you alive if you pull that "peace/love" crap on them. This is why you can't tell Rastafarians silly stuff like "good" morning or goodnight. Quantum physics and Meta Physics would prove them correct that talking that way is plain old spellcasting

[@johnrambo6167]

Tough to follow..... Seems like just a bunch of random statements with nothing behind them... how is the future bigger than the past if the past is infinite and was always there?

[@tillman40]

You have free will until some other thing determines that you no longer do

[@Hladovina]

Oyee reaylized in assembly theory that the Uhiniverse is a big fat pancake

[@diegoalejandrosanchezherre4788]

He talks nonsenses...

[@maxwell8758]

This guy doesn’t seem to know much of what he’s talking about. I don’t know why a chemist is trying to comment on these things.

[@osito123ify]

That's what I was going to say.

[@professorwolverinebeardsan470]

Lee doesn't understand the uncertainty principle. He should stick to what he's an expert on (chemistry).

[@diegoalejandrosanchezherre4788]

Talk about "time" without talk about general realtivity is silly

[@diegoalejandrosanchezherre4788]

@@splinterz5744 mass afect's both space and time....

[@davidrandell2224]

SR wrong due to reference frame mixing and bad math. GR follows as wrong. “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon for proper physics.

[@leopereirafilho1456]

Too much for my poor brain

[@bbok1616]

why is like button tiny

[@RobinRajan89]

This video proves that not everyone who is intelligent can communicate

[@LyricBossYT]

wat

[@seroskal9354]

It's one of those insane time believers. L

[@quidproquo3933]

it’s infinite .. humans trying to figure it out is absurd .. every degree every direction endless … keep trying to measure it tho .. silly

[@mateovncnt7411]

No no no! Great Britain

[@MLG85]

Huh?! 😵‍💫

[@omoklamok]

Universe is to big for us to explore in a lifetime nor a generation... HUman civilisation should explore the entire ocean first and the entire land and beyond the ice wall.... just i cant understand why we are focusing on this....

[@alexgonzalez8904]

This guy thinks he know it all def 😂 he’s all over the place just like his fashion

[@nicholasobrien5914]

The self-referentialism of nothingness is generational, new souls will always be 'born'.