The Vortex Ring, Close Up, in Slow Motion.

Vortex rings are amazingly beautiful! That, we wanted to see from close up, in slo motion, and in high definition. The camera we used is the GH4. 96 frames per second. More important is the light; we used 12 halogen spot lights and a large battery to get a bright constant focused light source.

[@StonesAndSand]

This literally solved a three-year problem I've been trying to decipher. THANK YOU!!!

[@x_gosie]

Thanks for sharing, this is a great observation to those making research. I found a lot of this on youtube but this one is indeed great!🙏👍

[@BeamRayo]

Beautiful, this is probably one of the best videos of vortex rings on you tube.

[@murfseye]

this is amazing. thank you for sharing.

[@Trebseig]

+murfs eye Thanks. And there is more comming; enough material ready for a new video where we use an extremely short flash duration to freezed the vortex ring with. Sharp detailed photos.

[@baharehpahlevan5067]

Wow, beautiful. Thank you

[@annoyed-intern]

Wow!! I am in love.

[@diederikschip6190]

brilliant, thanks!

[@personalcoach2131]

Awesome visualization of toroids !! Good job

[@helmutz.baumert3901]

Very nice! REminds me of my primary physics lectures from Alfred Recknagel at TU Dresden in the late sixties. He used an assistent in white coat and gave a show at the large stage of "his" building for a huge jung audience. For me the interesting point is today that MANY of these smoke rings in collision give what we call turbulence - forming a full spectrum which is today more or less well understood, thanks also to these experiments.

[@InFltSvc]

That is so cool!

[@stuxyz]

this was dope!

[@chuckomgyahoo]

Love this....

[@HeuristicObfuscation]

nice..love the side shot.... it looks like its dissected. you can see thru it

[@sizzla123]

Nice work

[@policematrixx]

awesome

[@elchicoes3032]

Eres un genio gracias por las imagenes, lastima el idioma... gracias,gracias.

[@noahdaniel6138]

Great video! thanks for sharing it. I just had question about the mechanism you used to produce the vortex rings - you seemed to have an electric motor or something - did you use compressed air - how did you produce the rings? Thanks!

[@dleivam]

wow, this is so awesome and only 120 likes?

[@CrazyFunnyCats]

We want donuts 🍩 now after seeing this Thanks 🙏 Cool channel

[@xaisthoj]

Wow, never realized a sound wave could actually generate a toroid.

[@alfredvander4199]

Dit is kunst, Professor of Vortexology.

[@plausible_dinosaur]

If you could make a leapfrogging vortices that would be wonderful!

[@egazoid]

Schiterend! Ben benieuwd hoe berekend uw ontwerp is... Ik heb een praktische toepassing voor zulke ringwervelgeneratoren bedacht, die zal mogelijk veel traumas voorkomen en zelfs levens redden! Nou, julie idee voor het genereren van impuls vind ik uitstekend! Simpel, verstelbaar, robust - geniaal! Denkt U dat het op te schalen is? Ik moet richting meer HP/s denken LOL :)

[@AgroconversionCheese]

This is an ideal spatial a standing wave, and can exist only in movement. If to catch it's tail you are very close to solving of your task.

[@GianniLaschi]

Thank you for sharing, i'm happy to see you back in this experiments.

[@Trebseig]

Hi Gianni. Uploaded two new vortex ring videos today, and I plan to have two new ones after that, of new/other experiments. The experiments have been done, but it takes soo much more time to edit the movies!

[@grinreaperoftrolls7528]

You should show how it works.

[@ScientificLee]

when used in smoke from a ciggy....it displays the Lorentz force effect.....vortex finger to vortex trumpet to halo and back to vortex...it is wave particle duality explained....again on my channel. :)

[@14aartis]

Scientific Lee link please!

[@TheNeokorben]

great Machine I wonder where I can buy this a smoke generator the things that make this kind of fun cake think I really thank you if you can tell me where you bought that machine

[@yoan4152]

could it maintain its shape if the ring would rotate around its center as well

[@seededsoul]

What wave frequency and properties did you use in your tone generator?

[@bartoszbarejko1585]

Dear Professor of Vortexology. Is it possible to share the slides? It is not clear in the downloads do you hold the licence. Thank you for your time.

[@timgogodown193]

Can you buy another one of those instruments that create the circular cloud and put them in front of each other collide the Rings

[@Umar_Dargi_Al_Caucasian]

How can I get in touch with you? I can help in this direction. I have photos of my works, they clearly show the shape of the vortex toroid.

[@nathancook8048]

serious question: I noticed that , when creating smoke rings from my mouth and using various sized cylindrical tubes, that , when done in a certain manner, the ring vortices start off as hexagonal in shape but change to more circular shaped a couple feet out...wanted to make an experiment using different tones and frequencies ..... and to make the butterfly lookin ones you make one end of the tube mor elliptical...

[@nathancook8048]

the question was...why is that?

[@Trebseig]

Hi Nathan, thanks for your serious question. I have seen that also! Hexagonal shaped vortex rings, and I also counted other than 6 sides/corners. A vortex ring wants to be round, that to me feels logical, as the low and high pressure areas are kind of in balance then. But what is the story with the hexagonal shaped vortex ring?? I don't know yet. I can imagine that the conditions during the creation of the vortex ring can lead to the the hexagonal shape. Especially the shape of hole. But... I only used round holes. Reminds me of the hexagonal shape that can be found on the pole of a gas planet. Saturn's hexagon vortex. Playing with sounds.. maybe; I don't know how well a vortex ring can resonate and at which frequency. That would be an interesting experimental road to travel! Interesting also: place other gas or an electric charge inside the core of the vortex ring.

[@nathancook8048]

Giesbert Nijhuis yea ..I was thinking that it had to do with acoustics as well..that's what they said about the giant hexagon on said planet...you get butterfly looking ones when sent through an oval...there's also slow build ones that require a slow breath...I usually shoot them through various sized tubes..

[@thesoundofart7124]

The Aether...

[@vanotank1645]

нужно, что бы камера двигалась с кольцом в одном направлении и смотрела на кольцо. В этом случаи фокус камеры будет тот что нужно.

[@antigraviticsystems1]

Muy Buen video, enorabuena, yo intento hacer lo mismo pero con plasma y aun no lo he conseguido

[@Trebseig]

+antigraviticsystems1 - Hi, I was planning to make a plasma vortex ring as well! Have you done it already? ..Boy; I see you are busy doing high voltage experiments. Would love to work with you on dangerous propulsion stuff.

[@antigraviticsystems1]

+Giesbert Nijhuis I am open to many possibilities, you can count on me to launch their ideas, I love your videos, hug

[@shermanw.braithwaite582]

Lately, Jet Engines, have those rings coming out of them. I see now, it's no coincident.

[@user-gf5mq5yk8x]

这就是特斯拉所说的无线能量传输，只是把烟圈换成以太环。关键就是如何创造以太环

[@enjoypolo]

Toroidal physics

[@sparkimoto]

anti-gravity propulsion! space/time bubble

[@horus2779]

what about two electromagnetic vortices

[@user-ub6cs4zk4j]

So much so are comets

[@mantancodgaming7753]

It looks like a jellyfish right?

[@giampaolopolselli5820]

It looks like jellyfish😮

[@ScientificLee]

I did the same with a cigarrete and ligts...as a smoke Ouroboros is the snake that eats itself...I show how it is constructed with passage.... on my channel.

[@Markoul11]

3:10

[@smatthewsauthor]

Jellyfish!

[@Trebseig]

+smatthews author So funny how just about everybody recognizes a jellyfish in this! Me to. Though a jellyfish makes totally different motions to propel itself forwards; slowly pulsing, water in water out. While the vortex ring is spinning fast. Both are beautiful.

[@smatthewsauthor]

I'm sure the motion is the same but the jellyfish can't generate the faster rotational speed, so they move slower. Have you watched my 501 a The Perfect Vortex Coil video yet? I think you will enjoy it...

[@camerons9677]

We get it, you vape

[@nathancook8048]

try more angled shots.. head on etc.

[@Trebseig]

+nathan cook - that is difficult because of the very limited depth of field. Difficult, not impossible though. And I need a better slow-motion camera, and better light. 96 fps is just not fast enough.

[@kristiehansen231]

Great job it's absolutely beautiful. Check out Scientific Lee, channel on you tube. He has the theory of all theorys. ck out

[@jrM5492]

hahahah that slow motion looks like a squid