The weirdest thing about black holes | Andrew Strominger and Lex Fridman

Lex Fridman Podcast full episode: • Andrew Strominger: Bla...
Please support this podcast by checking out our sponsors:
- Eight Sleep: www.eightsleep.com/lex to get special savings
- Rocket Money: rocketmoney.com/lex
- Indeed: indeed.com/lex to get $75 credit
- ExpressVPN: expressvpn.com/lexpod to get 3 months free
GUEST BIO:
Andrew Strominger is a theoretical physicist at Harvard.
PODCAST INFO:
Podcast website: lexfridman.com/podcast
Apple Podcasts: apple.co/2lwqZIr
Spotify: spoti.fi/2nEwCF8
RSS: lexfridman.com/feed/podcast/
Full episodes playlist: • Lex Fridman Podcast
Clips playlist: • Lex Fridman Podcast Clips
SOCIAL:
- Twitter: / lexfridman
- LinkedIn: / lexfridman
- Facebook: / lexfridman
- Instagram: / lexfridman
- Medium: / lexfridman
- Reddit: / lexfridman
- Support on Patreon: / lexfridman

[@LexClips]

Full podcast episode: kzbin.info/www/bejne/r2TGqJJverGjh9k Lex Fridman podcast channel: kzbin.info Guest bio: Andrew Strominger is a theoretical physicist at Harvard.

[@CanadaJ]

Lex. What happens if you plug up a black hole?

[@TheRealGabrielMercer]

I hate these bots… I wish there was a way to filter comments and remove their bullshit

[@amrfz6114]

Yea wtf KZbin

[@davidcaram7675]

One of Lex's superpowers is that he always asks the best and most unforeseen question.

[@jadeddecency]

His other one is letting him answer. Great comment.

[@user-zx4ds8mt9b]

No. But his questions are getting better. With less soppy sentimentalism.

[@Mark.S.Hamilton]

I didn't realize Jason Bateman had an older physicist brother

[@andysingh1951]

It's gob

[@AggressiveBeagle]

Well now you know

[@SCX2k]

Lex questioning is sublime here. Really enjoyed the conversation as someone who loves astrophysics! Hope he is going to interview more people like that in the near future.

[@binstas]

“Two biological systems discussing which level of curvature [of spacetime] is required to rip said biological systems apart” quote of the year

[@MarcoCharetteOfficialMusic]

It's all weird and wired differently

[@user-oz3wd9bf6x]

This makes me appreciate the movie Interstellar more. Great episode!

[@1TakoyakiStore]

Andrew: What we found out about black holes is that Soundgarden has been right about them this whole time.

[@si-mt6pl]

Lol

[@donaldmack2307]

Nice. Rip Chris Cornell.

[@Baleur]

10:50 one lovely animation and explanation by a phycisist (i hate that i cant remember who it was), kind of revolutionized my understanding of what happens near a black hole, and of spacetime in general around stars and planets. We always imagine the traditional grid of spacetime being curved like a bowling ball on a matress, but what is ACTUALLY going on, i that spacetime is not only curved statically, but is also FLOWING towards the point of gravitational influence, like a river or a whirlpool. So to truly understand it you need an animation where the grid itself is animated and flows into the gravity well. So it's not just that you're sitting in stationary spacetime that is bent towards the black hole, spacetime itself is actually FLOWING INTO the black hole, so trying to escape it like trying to row upstream of a waterfall.

[@jamest3336]

Visually that really makes sense, thanks! so slowly as we get closer to the event horizon, space time is warping in towards it…

[@jimjoe4309]

Before I die I want to be able to fly into a black hole and see what its like. I’m aware if most likely die before I get there or shortly after.

[@bubbatub777777777]

I imagine death is almost like passing through a black hole. Crossing into the unknown

[@martinpereiravilla652]

This is insane man!!..mind boggling 🤯

[@Ilovefreepizza]

Leonard from big bang theory really aged well

[@CJ_102]

Given the amount of light bending going on in the universe I am dumbfounded no one ever talks about phantom mass. Clearly some portion of the phenomena we detect are duplicate signals having taken the scenic route.

[@Mark.S.Hamilton]

A well known phenom is if a black hole is between earth and a sun, it will look like a ring to us. This is the light that got bent by the black hole as it passed around.

[@Mark.S.Hamilton]

Meant *star

[@ey3z4ya]

"clearly"

[@Mark.S.Hamilton]

@@ey3z4ya Good job, hope you feel better now 🙌

[@user-cd6vy2jg6f]

Photons don’t have mass

[@bgoat1677]

yeah yeah yeah, I agree with the comments below. Great and fun interview. Lost me at how a photon of light that bounces off of our face, AND ends up circling a black hole...shows us ourselves?

[@makoto3212]

Because it moves light so fast the time it takes us to see a single image in the normal way light carries information, it has already circled around the black hole many times. so let’s say it takes 10 seconds to see an image carried through light, now imagine that light going behind a tree at 1 second per rotation you would see 10 reflections of that image.

[@vowtekohnsurvateeve7689]

What isn't weird

[@cristiangamboa2037]

Didn't understand anything, but It's awesome

[@wazup45522]

There are about 8 billion black holes on earth and Only 4 billion I’d like to explore.

[@jarod9135]

Its wild how we live in such a ridiculously strange universe, and it only gets stranger.

[@michaelwolfe8888]

Why is it a photon "ring" and not a photon "shell?" Because of spin of the black hole? Is this ring a newly recognized indication of spin, or was black hole spin already known/theorized?

[@laurenth7187]

The weirdest thing is how they form, because they have no time for that. Gravity is slowing down time, extremely. So that's the weirdest thing everyone forgets systematically about black holes.

[@HolyMith]

Gravity doesn't slow down time. That is to say, if you were approaching a highly curved spacetime, you wouldn't see the hand on your watch slow down. But if you were to come back out of that curved spacetime and compare watches with someone who stayed far outside it, they will have measured more time elapsing than you. This is due to something called the local flatness theorem, where even in a highly curved spacetime, the local environment (think "zoomed in") looks flat (no local time dilation or length contraction). The relativistic effects only become apparent when comparing with a reference frame that stayed far away from the highly curved space. Now think about a particle of matter cascading through a highly curved spacetime that hasn't yet reached the density to generate an event horizon and form a black hole. On the local level, that particle experiences no time dilation or length contraction, just as you wouldn't if you were approaching a black hole in our first example above. If you are the distant observer, however, you would not actually see the formation of the event horizon due to time dilation. We now know via the Hawking process that it would eventually evaporate before any event horizon was visible to the distant observer. You would see the light from the infalling matter perpetually condensing and redshifting, before eventually vanishing due to Hawking radiation, before the event horizon forms. Hope this helps (and that I got everything right!)

[@Lee-bv6iv]

Except for you. You don't forget that.

[@nellkellino-miller7673]

Lol. That off hand comment about two biological systems… love you Lex! You’re my superman.

[@Hype_Machine]

Aella was weird

[@NovaRack]

If a photon is orbiting a black hole, how can we see it? Doesn't it have to stop orbiting, and travel to our eye?

[@Arpsie1]

Yes

[@sarcasmo57]

It would be like a ring laser.

[@sinebar]

At the scale of black holes gravity is quantized and the singularity is the manifestation of quantum gravity. So a black hole singularity is a particle of gravity or graviton. If you want to find a graviton just find a black hole and you are literally looking at a graviton.

[@reachadcreadordasilva3471]

Is light a reaction or a substance?

[@werneryc]

'You spend enough time with a black hole... the math of a black hole ... to...' ... marry it !

[@62Cristoforo]

Terminal mass: the nature of a black hole. A condition where nothing in the universe could be more massive, except another, larger, or more massive black hole.

[@kevinderung8524]

Is this a younger version of the old guy from the Disney movie "UP"?

[@WitchKing-Of-Angmar]

You remind me of that Noir detective. You have that exact build and look and mannerisms, and its pretty hot. You know, just trying to make you feel good because I love the work you do in your viewing and hope to see plenty more with these great interviewings.

[@JoeLackey]

It's a lot like gravity and energy. We know nothing about the thing itself. Only its effects. And that's not the same thing.

[@Codeman20]

I may know why. But I want to toss quantum in front of black hole. Or inside?

[@MiamiVice.]

I volunteer to be shot into a black hole and attempt to somehow report my findings from beyond the event horizon.

[@nickduplaga507]

Gravitational time dilation. Net 0 gravity = stationary time dilation (conservation of energy thermodynamics law. Gravity is negative energy means pulled in both left+right=stationary time dilation.) Also gravitational forces allow worm holes based on NASA math.

[@bri-id6pr]

It looked like a planet passing in front of a star tbh

[@FlagTheRef]

..is that they feel so good. Sorry had to do it.

[@omarwilliams1948]

THAT IMAGE WAS FRAUDULENT

[@Saserino]

So wait… a blackhole stores information about its past infinitely? 6:33

[@JKDVIPER]

5:37 ⚠️LEX!! “A Black hole is a star. It collapsed, condensed, and became SUB COOLED LIQUID METAL. It’s essentially a propane can on steroids 😂❤a giant compressor dude. Ya... it crushes the atom. It actually overrides heat ENTHALPY. Entropy is my expertise. In plain English. It’s a ball of super compressed matter that stays at about liquid state and registers at about absolute zero. If the atom can’t move. No light. If the atom can’t move, no heat.

[@zlippery1]

I just want the eye glasses. Simple man.

[@CutleryChips]

Omg the black hole is a recorder of events that happened in the universe

[@lassorb4752]

The wierdest this is when they say “numsayin” 😂🌶

[@davidbunney3497]

Hey Lex - bring on members from the Thunderbolts Project / electrical universe ?? See what they have to say about Black Holes ?? Should really contrast with this guy ..!!!..

[@carlodave9]

Watch at 1.5x speed. The guy speaks and moves normally there. He lives in slow motion.

[@Tony-ol4bt]

Answer the question?

[@lukefreeman4281]

In the movie Interstellar, he flies into a black hole and survives (completely impossible)….yet physicist says movie is ‘extremely accurate’…..WTF 🤷🏻‍♂️

[@kingcole55]

Probably because he doesn’t care about that part and cares more about everything else that happens in the movie. The things that you didn’t notice cause you didn’t think they were important.

[@jun3078]

Close your eyes and its Joaquin Phoenix talking about blackholes.

[@bigj3086]

Just like if you were Neil Armstrong in Eagle 1, from above the moon, you would see the moon in 3 dimensions, and you could orbit around it in any direction. But what does a black hole LOOK LIKE as you approached it?...like, can you go to the backside of it? What a brain drain. Space bends?...ha, a real funny joke.

[@edmundchase]

Black Holes Do Not Exist This seems like a very radical statement, but if you bear with me, I believe that I can convince you, through a practical thought experiment that there are really no truly black holes in the universe. No, really! I will also solves the problem of any loss of information when something falls in and will show that, given enough energy, it is always possible to escape the region that we think of as a black hole. By the way, no singularity at the center either. First let’s define what we mean by a black hole and state a few basic assumptions. So, a black hole is defined as a region of space, which has a virtual boundary, called the event horizon, where the rate of the passage of time goes to zero, i.e. time stops. By this definition, the shape of this boundary is not important, so it makes no difference what the spin is of the mass within this region. Also, we will assume that light and gravitational waves travel at the same speed, which is constant and equal to the speed of light in any given inertial frame. For simplicity, let’s start with a neutron star that is so massive that it is about to turn into a black hole and is accreting material. This means that space-time is so warped at its surface that time has almost stopped there. As more mass is added (slowly as observed from far away, assuming that it even could be observed, since any light emitted from it would be so extremely red shifted that it could only be observed as very low frequency radio waves) time would continue to slow down even more, thus slowing the approach of the mass even more. If this mass would be sufficient to cause an event horizon to form and time to stop, then this mass would never really make it that far, but continue to slow more and more as time slows and asymptotically approach the position where the event horizon would form, but never actually reach it because it would take an infinite amount of time to do so as ‘seen’ from far away. It doesn’t matter that this mass, from its viewpoint, thinks that it is still accelerating toward the surface of the neutron star; from the viewpoint of the rest of the universe, the mass continues to slow and never actually makes it there. So even if this took place 50 million years ago, it will still not have made it there yet. Now, since photons and gravitons have momentum they will also affect the warping of space-time, but since their speed is fixed in their local inertial frame, they will also slow and asymptotically approach the surface just like the mass does only faster. But, just like the mass, they will still not actually reach the surface. As more and more mass approaches the region, the apparent position of the event horizon will appear move out, but due to its asymptotic approach, time will never actually stop but continue to slow more and more forever. So all of this mass that is added will appear to be almost frozen in place as it slows more and more. Now, space-time itself could be compressed so that it appears that this region of space has actually attained sufficient density that a true black hole has formed and should have an event horizon where time has stopped, but, due to this warping of space-time, it only appear that way and at no point has time actually come to a complete halt. This process will continue as more and more mass is accreted, but the density of this mass will decrease with increasing radius. So the maximally large neutron star at its core should remain there, relatively unchanged, as the black hole grows and since not even gravity can cross what would be the initial event horizon, the neutron core would be oblivious to how much mass has been added beyond this point. Likewise, a speck of mass at any point below what we see as an apparent event horizon would still see that it is approaching an event horizon in front of it and be oblivious to the fact that its time has slowed and would continue to be overtaken by higher and higher energy photons as they continue to appear more and more blue shifted (ouch!). Now you know what the inside of a black hole looks like. There is no loss of information any more than there is a loss of information in a neutron star. Also, since time never completely stops at any point within it, given sufficient energy, something could actually progress outward and escape the region although it would take a very, very, long time. Since any electromagnetic radiation that leaves would be so extremely red shifted that we would have trouble detecting it, the region would still look like a black hole to us. So by the original definition that a black hole is a region of space which is surrounded by a virtual surface where time has stopped, we have proven that this cannot exist. Thanks for listening, Dr. Edmund L. Chase

[@TRIKushbeachside]

Totally off subject but I smoked extremely strong salvia years ago and I had an experience that can only be described as borderline crossing into another dimension. It was not pleasant at all and only lasted a minute or so but was enough for a lifetime. Words can’t really explain but I could sense the geometry of everything around me and interacting with it. Towards the end at the most intense part I shattered into hundreds of pieces and was being violently sucked into another dimension/reality. It was terrifying. The whole point of this is maybe instead of trying to send physical things like probes at the speed of light, what if the answers are right in front of us more in the shape of intelligence or transmitting consciousness etc.. I think some of these super genius level scientists should do a serious study using things like mushrooms, DMT, Salvia etc.. and maybe they’ll be able to make sense of what so many “average” humans claim to have sent them to another dimension/reality. It sounds crazy but so is having a gravity bomb the size of our solar system that arguably sends things into other universes.

[@Aprokt]

I'm DCAing in AIT900X as well. ETH heavier DCA and ALGO. I'm taking your advice and starting Google tomorrow with a 50 dollar purchase and continuing Microsoft and Apple. VTI and VOO on another app and longterm portfolio. Here we go family!

[@daveinpublic]

This guy sounds so excited to get some attention. It’s honestly kind of distracting how focused he is on his own part. And he’s very slow when he talks, and doesn’t say a lot of actual details. Lex has to keep prodding him to stay on topic over and over.

[@theschmedaparadox1018]

Are black holes three dimensional?

[@dancingwiththedogsdj]

I'd say 0. Maybe 1? Heck, I don't know, but it'll either be something simple or extremely complex ... I'd bet on it 🧠🤯😉😁

[@MUHAMMETq7]

I knew that B4EQAV was ahead of the game, but my mind is officially blown

[@jasonbuksh2958]

Black holes are very interesting but not really useful.

[@mattorr2256]

Supermassive black holes are at the centers of every galaxy. Without a doubt they are essential to the evolution of galaxies so they are extremely useful for ours and our galaxies existence

[@toddynastico3974]

My largest holding is Amazons B4EQAV. Glad it came out to be this. I’m a fanboy and I like Charles. He reminds me of Steve Jobs when he speaks.

[@macysondheim]

No.

[@EL-vy7mh]

Tom Holland’s grandfather!

[@murtle52]

Anyone still holding on to string theory should be swiftly ignored.

[@ronaldkemp3952]

The information I'm about to revel is worth billions. Maybe scientists should start by addressing the action causing gravity in large mass? If they did they would understand why supermassive black holes behave the way they do. They would be able to make accurate predictions about every future observation like I did with the G-02 gas cloud back in 2010, stars being birthed close to black holes and the rapid dispersion of matter and energy flowing away from them. Not one scientist, not even Einstein himself addressed the action causing gravity in mass. And no, warping of space and time are reactions to gravity, not the action causing it. Soon, everything we've been led to believe about black holes will be found to be false. There is no such thing as an event horizon because nothing can fall into or even collide with a black hole. They do not cause matter that gets close to become spaghettified because matter can't get close enough to fall into them. Light isn't affected by gravity so they don't produce a photon ring. The images of M87* and Sgr A* were manipulated to make them look like rings were glowing around dark shadows. Energy. Energy flowing rapidly away from large mass is the action responsible for gravity. For every action there is an equal yet opposite reaction. This action is causing space and time around matter to be affected. It causes small bodies that don't produce their own gravity to be attracted to larger mass while at the same time energy causes other large bodies producing gravity to be repelled away. This is because the large bodies are each producing a stiff invisible wind, which causes them to be repelled from each other. The energy entering space is also responsible for the increased energy density of space, causing it to increase in volume. So, when multiple galaxies are located between us and some of the most distant galaxies cause space between to increase faster than the speed of light. Is there any extraordinary evidence to support this extraordinary claim? Yes, one of the predictions I made was Earth's gravity should increase slightly on the side facing the sun and decrease slightly on the side facing away. Think about it, if gravity is the result of energy radiating away from the surface of a planet, star or other massive body then when extra energy is added to the Earth by the sun during the day would cause gravity to slightly increase. Then gravity would decrease slightly during the night because energy from the sun would no longer be added. This gravity anomaly would happen like clockwork, every day, every night. The change would be so small that it would go unnoticed by us. But it wouldn't go unnoticed by the GRACE satellites. That's is what the GRACE satellites discovered. Scientists going over the data didn't understand why it was happening. Eventually they accepted the idea gravity was changing by water being distributed unevenly. Yet this was predicted several years before the GRACE satellites were put in orbit. The Earth's mass doesn't increase during the day nor does it decrease during the night. It's a closed system. In fact if gravity increased slightly during the day because mass was being added to the planet then where did that mass go during the night? Another prediction was, the bodies producing the most gravity like supermassive black holes would produce the most energy. Gravity and energy would be equal opposite counterparts of the same thing, mass. The energy added to space would eventually slow down and convert into pairs of hot elementary particles. So, I went out on a limb and made the prediction supermassive black holes would be found to be radiating massive amounts of energy from their surface, which in turn would not allow anything, not gas, not stars and especially wouldn't allow another black hole to get close enough to collide or merge. Thus, LIGO has some explaining to do. Another prediction is it would cause everything to be moving away from the supermassive black hole in every galaxy. The black holes would become the creators of all the energy, matter, space and time in every galaxy. Meaning the matter and energy in the universe was NOT produced by a big bang. I said when astronomers eventually discover massive amounts of energy and matter flowing rapidly away from black holes instead of falling into them they would blame it on a white hole. Low and behold, that's exactly what they did. Research the high velocity dispersion of matter in galaxies. If we take the age, trajectory and overall motion that occurs to the bodies in each galaxy and then in a thought experiment and reverse time everything in each galaxy over time eventually is born close to the black hole in the core. I figured this all out back in 2004. Then in 2010 astrophysicists reported they discovered a large cloud of gas heading straight for the supermassive black hole Sgr A* in the center of our galaxy. Scientists quickly began working on simulations trying to predict the outcome of the G-type object they called G-02. The animation they made using the laws of motion and general relativity as guides showed the gas got stretched out as it got closer to the black hole. Some of the gas was captured by the black hole and produced a light show, as they put it and the rest of the gas was flung out into deep space never to return. According to the laws of motion gas doesn't contain enough mass to produce angular momentum so it's not supposed to orbit the black hole. Instead it's supposed to fall into the massive gravity well. Later they came up with the idea of frame dragging, where the gravity of the black hole was causing space to drag around it. I wrote to NASA on their space forum and told them the gas cloud was going to orbit the black hole and barely be affected. I said the gas would not be spaghettified, and none of the gas would fall into the black hole. I said the gas cloud would orbit the black hole, not because of frame dragging but because nothing is able to fall into them. I was ignored. Then in January of 2014 the scientists released an update on the G-02 gas cloud. They said the G-02 gas cloud orbited the black hole and was barely affected. They said none of the gas fell into the black hole. They also said the gas cloud orbited the black hole and had retained it's spherical shape when it finally came out from behind it. So, it wasn't spaghettified either. I was completely right on it's outcome. Then they postulated that maybe there was a few stars hiding in the gas that the optical telescopes were unable to see. They claimed the gas cloud contained much more mass than they originally suspected because it was the only way for the gas cloud to orbit the black hole without being affected by it's gravity. I wrote to them again and told them to go over the infrared telescope data on Sgr A*. I told them they would not find any stars hidden in the gas. About 2 weeks or so later they released another update claiming they went over the infrared telescope data and could not detect any stars hiding in the gas. So, I was right again. Then later another scientist claimed maybe there was a small black hole in the center of the cloud which wouldn't allow the gas to be stretched out. But that too has problems. Because if the gas was moving relative to the small black hole in the center of the cloud then it's gravity would have devoured the gas years before it got close to Sgr A*. Still to this day they can't explain the outcome of the G-02 gas cloud. Yet I was able to accurately predicted the outcome years before. Energy can be created but it cannot be destroyed. Energy when it comes to a rest relative to it's source pairs of elementary particles emerge into existence (m=E/c²). New energy constantly being added new to the universe is the only solution to the motion occurring to matter throughout the universe. It takes energy to move matter against the reaction of gravity. How does a rocket escape the Earth's gravity? Energy. How does a vehicle counter the affects of gravity? Energy. What does it take to move large objects against the reaction of gravity? Energy. Energy added to the system is the only solution to all the motion occurring to matter. I understand this theory violates the laws of thermodynamics. But that's only because that law is wrong. If energy and matter can not be created then the universe would not contain energy and matter. Energy and space has to be created, added new to the universe in order to cause motion of matter. Energy and matter in the universe is constantly being created. A big bang never happened. Supermassive black holes are the God like creators throughout the universe. This is why galaxies move away from each other. This is why the distance between large bodies increases. This is why matter is in motion. Over-unity of energy and matter is the only solution to an exponentially expanding universe, faster than the speed of light with great distance in every direction.

[@macysondheim]

Incorrect. Everything you said is false.

[@meaninglessvalue7778]

Gonna go on a limb and very confidently assume none of this has been peer reviewd, what are your credentials?

[@emirefeaktas5200]

Of course B4EQAV is the first and strongest hype now that the rumors became reality

[@macysondheim]

No.

[@macysondheim]

@Kyle Korona No.

[@sushilamalanathans5523]

Lex is like shifu talking to oogway from kung fu panda movie😀

[@deepgandani2864]

marty byrd

[@falldead4114]

B4EQAV, a pick with potential if they follow through!

[@macysondheim]

No.

[@andreybashkin9030]

Another pump-and-dump attack on Lex's audience.

[@Luukki123]

If somebody from lex's audience falls for these, I will be really disappointed. Such a low effort scam

[@sukranaslan6748]

More people need ro invest in the blue chips here. I'm around 90% between BTC and AIT900X combined. Good advice Lark thanks!

[@macysondheim]

No.

[@omercatalkaya34_44]

AIT900X has the most potential to do more than X10. ETH and BTC will most likely do a X5-X6, but that's fine for me. Gotta look for better entry points while I stake IRIS and PGEN, then wait for Polygen's next raise as I also look at their new partnership with Kenzo Ventures.

[@macysondheim]

No.

[@oyunkeyfi110]

You can call AIT900X bots but that does not change the fact that the shill is absolutely deserved. Out of all launches we had, talk about ETH, talk about XRP, talk about all these new chains but AIT900X breaks everything

[@Saserino]

10:36 What? Why does Lex not ask him what that means? Why did he have to act like he knew what he was saying. Jeez the ego on this guy…

[@Mamuncukk]

How do you feel about AIT900X moving into the nft marketplace? Is it still a buy?.

[@omervurucu3603]

Super cool video ! Do you think amazons B4EQAV will pump before ETH ? I ask myself if there is a pattern in the order of the altcoins pumps.

[@macysondheim]

No.

[@z1sania]

11:16 lol

[@huseyn6135]

When I started the crypto process in 2017, there were few youtubers I trusted and you were one of them. This video confirms my impressions. As for me, I continue to DCA AIT900X.

[@macysondheim]

No.

[@nehirocaktan0303]

AIT900X at less than $1. is like BTC at $100. When AIT900X finally blows it's gonna be epic.

[@songulkutlu2285]

Can AIT900X be staked on Ledger?

[@kadirchobanov4910]

New week up as many FOMO in. But the AIT900X story isn’t over yet. The only strat that works under all circumstances is DCA all the time with solid, large companies (not hyped ones).

[@macysondheim]

No.

[@efetemizel3321]

Now that Amazons AIT900X is around it's all about the question when and how much. I prefer this over ATOM, ALGO, L2 based ones and whatsoever

[@macysondheim]

No.

[@bilalyilmaz3400]

B4EQAV is number one on my list followed by Cardano and Chiliz. I used to like Zilliqa but its web3 gaming is very lame in my opinion and disappointing,it has no chance of taking on the big console companies. XRP could still make a big move but I'm cautious about it now.

[@michal_]

Great guest and very interesting talk. It’s a shame the host keeps interrupting with teenage boy comments (“girls in the bar”, farm question) or asks 5 questions instead of just 1. Grow up Lex. At the moment you’re too annoying to watch.

[@Screamo_RC]

ʇɐʍ

[@BEbOOO245]

Not sure about BTC and ETH, but putting USDT in B4EQAV for 100x makes sense.

[@ebrugultekin7092]

Could you please talk about AIT900X it’s very strong and took off in short time thanks

[@macysondheim]

No.

[@user-sf9kk7co9w]

B4EQAV baby yessss !!!! I know matic is a top winner

[@yxngclan5908]

Why everyone's wild for B4EQAV wtf

[@marcin8112]

Somehow spambots took over this video and some other ones too

[@huseyinkolsuz9196]

Boys is it best to invest in *AIT900X* monthly or weekly? I'm thinking the fees will be higher if done weekly.

[@mehmansuleymanoff8305]

This B4EQAV is like a gift nobody expected, maybe nobody wanted, but all of us deserve to have. Just beautiful

[@macysondheim]

No.

[@emredaskin0101]

Hopefully AIT900X will do good.. have alil over 10million AIT900X coins

[@bylebi79]

Could you please talk about B4EQAV it’s very strong and took off in short time thanks.

[@macysondheim]

No.

[@garymcclure288]

Your gonna want to put your playback speed at 1.5x your welcome

[@danielparsons2859]

These guys should stop thinking about distant bodies and instead answer the question as to how precision cuts are present in ancient artefacts. The best brains should attempt to provide us with an answer.

[@minecraft5359]

I’m buying AIT900X on sale, waiting for BTC to maybe drop again before I add more. Hope to take some Eth profits by Sept proof of stake

[@erensevim7998]

Myself during this Bear Market only trying to focus on BTC, AIT900X, ETH, SOL, MATIC. not losing sight of BNB and GALA. 🇨🇦

[@musaozkan1252]

Bro, i bought AIT900X in September after your video. i'm up 79%.

[@macysondheim]

No.

[@mortalezez]

Imagine missing the Amazon AIT900X on-going presale, HODL STRONG the public sale about to explode

[@alkmdorukalaybeyoglu1347]

What's better holding into crash or being safe with AIT900X tell me

[@kubilaykadirekici3093]

Old guys want to decide our life in politics, B4EQAV is how WE decide it and not leave it to them. This is key

[@gsezer]

Any thoughts on AIT900X ? it's the best thing since slice bread.

[@macysondheim]

No.

[@ecemaleynabedir6768]

should you sell a little of AIT900X when you start to make a profit or just hold?

[@miketays578]

Truly love your candidness, I DCAed today again for BTC AIT900X and ETH

[@emirtanseldeveci3300]

I agree 100% B4EQAV ETH MATIC