The Wizard of Oz is not just a children’s tale; it is a profound allegory laden with symbols that resonate with deep truths about the human condition, the search for self-realization, and the journey beyond the illusions of the world. At the heart of this allegory lies Toto, a seemingly simple and loyal dog, who plays the pivotal role of unveiling the truth by pulling back the curtain to expose the Wizard. Let us explore the symbolism of Toto and the main characters-Dorothy, the Tin Man, the Lion, and the Scarecrow-in the context of this great revelation. Toto: The Revealer of Illusion Toto represents intuition, discernment, and the purity of unconditioned awareness. While the other characters are captivated by the grandeur and intimidation of the Wizard's projected image, it is Toto who senses the falseness of the illusion. Toto’s small but courageous act of pulling back the curtain is symbolic of our inner knowing, the uncorrupted aspect of ourselves that instinctively seeks truth. He embodies the courage to question appearances, the curiosity to explore deeper, and the ability to expose the mechanisms behind deception. Toto reminds us that no matter how grand the illusion, it is often maintained by nothing more than a frail and ordinary truth hidden in plain sight. Dorothy: The Seeker of Home Dorothy symbolizes the soul’s longing for unity, for "home," which in a spiritual sense is the state of oneness with the divine source. Her journey through Oz represents the trials and tribulations of life, the separation we feel from our true essence, and the eventual realization that the power to return home has always been within us. Her ruby slippers, representing spiritual tools or innate abilities, remind us that the answers we seek externally are always within. Toto’s act of revelation aligns with Dorothy’s awakening-that the Wizard, an external authority, is powerless compared to the inner authority of the self. The Scarecrow: The Mind Seeking Wisdom The Scarecrow, who believes he lacks a brain, symbolizes the misunderstood and undervalued intellect. His journey illustrates that wisdom does not come solely from external validation or institutions but through experience, self-discovery, and the realization that true intelligence is already within us. Toto’s exposure of the Wizard affirms to the Scarecrow that his perceived inadequacies are part of the illusion designed to keep him doubting himself. The Scarecrow’s brilliance, already evident in his creative problem-solving throughout the journey, is a reminder that our minds are not empty but often clouded by self-doubt. The Tin Man: The Heart Seeking Love The Tin Man, who laments his lack of a heart, represents the emotional self, often hardened by life’s challenges and the fear of vulnerability. His rusted and immobile form symbolizes how emotional wounds and fears can paralyze our ability to connect. Yet, his actions throughout the journey reveal a deep capacity for compassion and love, proving that his heart was never absent. Toto’s revelation of the Wizard emphasizes that the Tin Man’s belief in his inadequacy is another falsehood, freeing him to embrace the love and sensitivity that were always within him. The Cowardly Lion: The Spirit Seeking Courage The Lion, who sees himself as a coward, embodies the soul’s struggle to find courage amidst fear. He represents the misunderstood nature of true courage, which is not the absence of fear but the ability to act despite it. Throughout the journey, the Lion demonstrates bravery in protecting his friends, showing that his courage was never missing. Toto’s unmasking of the Wizard affirms the lesson that courage comes not from external sources or affirmations but from within, in the willingness to confront the truth and act with integrity. The Wizard: The Illusion of Power The Wizard is the archetype of false authority, a projection of control that derives its strength from the fear and belief of those who follow it. He represents the societal systems, dogmas, and individuals that perpetuate illusions to maintain their power. Toto’s unveiling of the Wizard is a powerful act of dismantling these false systems, showing that what appears powerful and omnipotent is often fragile and built upon deception. The Wizard’s admission of his humanity underscores the profound truth that no external force can grant us what we already possess within ourselves. The Curtain: The Veil of Illusion The curtain itself is a potent symbol of the veils that obscure reality. It represents the false narratives, distractions, and fears that keep us from seeing the truth. Toto’s act of pulling it back mirrors the spiritual process of awakening-tearing down the barriers of illusion to reveal the simple, often mundane truth behind them. The Journey: Awakening to the Truth Ultimately, The Wizard of Oz is a tale of self-realization and empowerment. Each character’s perceived lack is revealed to be an illusion, and Toto’s role as the revealer reminds us that the path to truth begins with questioning appearances and trusting our inner knowing. The journey is not about acquiring something new but about reclaiming what was always within. The Lesson for Us All In our lives, Toto invites us to be courageous in pulling back the curtains of our own illusions, whether they are self-imposed fears, societal constructs, or external authorities that seek to dominate our sense of self. The Scarecrow, Tin Man, and Lion teach us that wisdom, love, and courage are inherent qualities, waiting to be rediscovered. Dorothy reminds us that "home" is not a distant place but the essence of who we are, accessible the moment we awaken to our true nature. Toto’s seemingly small act of defiance is a profound reminder: sometimes, the smallest among us, the simplest actions, and the quietest truths have the power to dismantle the grandest illusions. Let us all embody Toto’s spirit, pulling back the curtain in our own lives, and walking the path of truth with courage, wisdom, love, and unity.
@jamescarstairs33848 күн бұрын
what in the chatgpt
@tommysimpson74597 ай бұрын
Toto means “in total, all together; Latin in toto”. Notice how Toto was not scared of the Great Wizard’s theatrics, yet he was so small in size compared to the Wizard, no-one seemed to notice him. The smoke, flames and hologram images were designed to frighten people into doing as the Great Wizard of Oz commanded. Toto simply went over, looked behind the curtain saw it was a scam, and started barking until others paid attention to him and came to see what all the barking was about. It was just an ordinary person controlling the levers that created the illusions of the Great Wizard’s power and authority. The veil hiding the corporate legal fiction and its false courts was removed. The Wizards game was up. It’s too bad that people don’t realize just how loud a bark from a little dog is.
@Grayraven7776 ай бұрын
Toto means young boy, in this context, but I agree with your interpretation otherwise, however it is the "young boy" who is small and humble enough to see under the curtain, to see that the religious authority was just another man made scam.
@andyperkins72266 ай бұрын
That's why the wicked witch neighbor threatened to kill toto
@MaskedMan664 ай бұрын
@@Grayraven777 The Wizard was not a "religious authority," he was a king.
@Grayraven7774 ай бұрын
@@MaskedMan66 that's your interpretation, I see Ceasar aka the Vicar of Christ aka the Pope, the Kings are under his control, that is why world leaders line up to kiss his ring.
@MaskedMan664 ай бұрын
@@Grayraven777 No, that's how the book tells it. Nobody worshiped the Wizard. Conversely, the Pope is not a king, nor does he command kings.
@80sism Жыл бұрын
The book was written in the gilded age. So how is the story about WW II? It is about adding the silver standard to our economy
@MaskedMan66 Жыл бұрын
No, that is not what it is about. It is about a little girl who is whisked away to a magical land and goes on an adventure.
@1312Johnny8 ай бұрын
Dorothy’s slippers were silver in the book! (Only changed to ruby to showcase Technicolor film) Yellow brick road is gold standard. The 3 characters represent farmers industry workers and politicians (cowards) marching on DC (emerald city) THE POPULIST MOVEMENT basically
@MaskedMan664 ай бұрын
@@1312Johnny The silver shoes weren't slippers. And you're wrong about all the rest.
@dougkuykendall1547Ай бұрын
About GOING BACK to gold and silver as it was. laid out in the constitution.
@MaskedMan66Ай бұрын
@@dougkuykendall1547 But not in Baum's book.
@osborn.illustration2 жыл бұрын
What an incredible analysis of this legendary film! This really covers the historical context of the film which I felt was overlooked in other reviews. The rise of fascism and the class disparity are subliminal in the film, but are consistently there nonetheless. The context of the poverty is quite powerful: the setup of Dorothy being an orphan in the Dust Bowl during the Great Depression is heart wrenching & you can see how that would fuel her imagination & desire to travel. I believe there to be some occult & alchemy symbolism within the story as well. Great video! Subscribed!
@MaskedMan662 жыл бұрын
Dorothy lived in 1900, so the Great Depression was of no account.
@osborn.illustration2 жыл бұрын
@@MaskedMan66 The film is different from the book, smartass. It was made late in the Great Depression and is inarguably meant to appeal to a Depression-era audience. People like my grandparents who raised me who loved the movie for those reasons. The time period context in which a movie is made has at least as much relevance as the time period in which the movie is set. The same has been said about "Gone with the Wind", which came out the same year in 1939. Both movies are very much about the Depression despite being set earlier.
@Venejan8 ай бұрын
@@MaskedMan66 Yes, and the costumes and technology on the Kansas farm are also clearly from around 1900, not 1939.
@MaskedMan668 ай бұрын
@@Venejan Exactly; in fact, if the old story is true, the frock coat that Frank Morgan wore as Professor Marvel is from that period, and belonged to L. Frank Baum himself.
@LightBeingsBE4 ай бұрын
@@MaskedMan66 5:36
@sjmullen6691Ай бұрын
It does kind of change my view of Wizard of Oz to know that through the whole film, Judy was tweaked out of her mind. One other message was Aunt Em saying, "Well we can't go against the law, poor Toto will have to go"
@bevturquoise46513 ай бұрын
Why are you playing music while you are explaining???
@shirzacademics84353 жыл бұрын
A fantastic analysis. Very logically and concisely produced. I look forward to your future works.
@MaskedMan664 ай бұрын
It's rubbish.
@doctorpistachio2423 жыл бұрын
How is this Quality Content FREE?!?!
@1312Johnny8 ай бұрын
It’s not. You owe me £10
@wilmoney46192 ай бұрын
This film is definitely not this deep. Its a fantasy and brilliant movie that has nothing to do with this modern abstract art bull shit.
@JOHNNYCHICAGO8 Жыл бұрын
I remember watching this movie with my grandma
@DeeeBoyy6 күн бұрын
I don’t think people really wanna touch this one, but it seems that the wizard is representative of God and the man behind the curtain is representative of the man in the robe, the leader of the church. But if you really wanna know how things work, the saying goes, follow the money, money being representative of the gold bar, which is the yellow brick. “Follow the yellow brick Road.”
@jesuschristsuperstar25th453 жыл бұрын
Whenever Poostin uploads, I stop whatever I'm doing and watch. Just how it goes
@NiniExtreme3 жыл бұрын
I must agree.... Without Poosti in uploada.. i am lost. These things.
@lonewave12 ай бұрын
After watching this "analysis" of the movie, I realized that people today are still taking Acid / LSD and trying to still grasp reality while on it!
@christiansoldier7710 күн бұрын
This movie is a gnostic allegory
@Borntu Жыл бұрын
What are you on about, mate?
@JSFGuy4 ай бұрын
6:34 never mind the neighbor lady Mrs Gulch inherited all her value from a man. Probably a man she helped delete with her toxicity.
@MaskedMan664 ай бұрын
There's nothing to even imply that. She's a spinster.
@NewWorldDAO2 жыл бұрын
Is that why you guys keep that my multi poo four months ago and I still haven’t gotten her back
@RebelYell1346 ай бұрын
Interesting interpretation. I came to a different one. It's about NPD within a family dynamic and societal one as well. The abuse leads to CPTSD in good little Dorthy. expressing itself in D.I.D. the Lion, scarecrow,and tinman. With Dorthy as the host personality. The tornado was the fracturing of her mind into multiple personalities. The house crashing down on one of the bad witch represented the real life act Dorthy committed. A death. the Wizard represents her father, The wicked witch of the west is an Aunt, mother, or older sibling in representation. the munchkins represent those in the world who see the truth since they watch it from a 3rd person point of view. they see the narcissist attack their victim, but stand aside and do nothing but sooth after the attack is over. flying monkeys are the beta personality types that become the army of the narcissistic leader. In the end, putting out the fire is what destroys the narcissist. putting out the fire the narcissist spreads.
@MaskedMan664 ай бұрын
That's just as pants as the video. And the avian simians are called Winged Monkeys.
@HotBoiiSlimeАй бұрын
You know you f’d up right
@MaskedMan662 жыл бұрын
This is the REAL meaning of it all: "Folklore, legends, myths and fairy tales have followed childhood through the ages, for every healthy youngster has a wholesome and instinctive love for stories fantastic, marvelous and manifestly unreal. The winged fairies of Grimm and Andersen have brought more happiness to childish hearts than all other human creations. "Yet the old time fairy tale, having served for generations, may now be classed as 'historical' in the children’s library; for the time has come for a series of newer 'wonder tales' in which the stereotyped genie, dwarf and fairy are eliminated, together with all the horrible and blood-curdling incidents devised by their authors to point a fearsome moral to each tale. Modern education includes morality; therefore the modern child seeks only entertainment in its wonder tales and gladly dispenses with all disagreeable incident. "Having this thought in mind, the story of 'The Wonderful Wizard of Oz' was written solely to please children of today. It aspires to being a modernized fairy tale, in which the wonderment and joy are retained and the heartaches and nightmares are left out. "L. Frank Baum Chicago, April, 1900"
@poostin87712 жыл бұрын
Fantastic perspective and insight on the source of inspiration for the film. Very true that the original source text's sequels as well most derivative works speak a lot on the points you mentioned, morality becomes introduced quickly throughout the later books in the series, with a heavy emphasis on innocence and coming to grips with the fact that wonderland cannot exist without the inherent duality between good and bad. However, as mentioned throughout the video, several factors were changed from the original source text when being translated to film. Victor Fleming intentionally removed, added and changed multiple scenes, perspectives and ideologies around in order to better suit the time at which the film was released in. Baum's vision was definitely altered and to an extent, diminished by the release of the film, which instantly and lastingly eclipsed the popularity of the original novel, particularly with the explicit references to the political climate at the time, which, ironically is shielded from the innocent due to it requiring analysis, as well as pre-existing knowledge of historical context to unveil, as if the evils of the world only come to those who seek knowledge of their events. "Obstacles make a better picture" -Victor Fleming, 1940, Bel Air CA
@MaskedMan662 жыл бұрын
@@poostin8771 Victor Fleming had nothing to do with the script, which was the result of twenty-odd minds, including those of Bert Lahr and Jack Haley, who added bits of their own dialogue as filming progressed. There were no explicit references to the political climate of 1938 and 1939 since no mention was even made of politics, and because of the fact that the story was set in 1900.
@jburger84 Жыл бұрын
The Tin Man with no heart is an obvious reference to industrialization, while the Scarecrow with no brain appears to represent agriculture, and the Cowardly Lion seems to represent political leaders that are all talk and no action. In my mind, society (Dorothy) moves forward when all of these work towards a common goal using resources such as gold and silver (the yellow brick road and silver slippers) to aid them. Ultimately, Dorothy finds that happiness and fulfillment can be found within herself and her family rather than in the utopian Emerald City of Oz.
@MaskedMan66 Жыл бұрын
@@jburger84 All that kak was invented by a college professor in the 1960's in order to make his boring classes interesting by appealing to pop culture. L. Frank Baum's reasons, which I already quoted, are clear. The Tin Woodman-- who, as anyone knows who knows the story, already has a heart-- had his origin was in Baum's love of tin toys. The Scarecrow-- who, as anyone knows who knows the story, already has a brain-- came from a recurring nightmare that Baum had in childhood. The Cowardly Lion-- who, as anyone knows who knows the story, already has courage-- was simply a walking paradox, which appealed to Baum. Baum wrote fourteen Oz books in all-- did you know that?-- and eventually, Dorothy did make her home in the Emerald City, having Princess Ozma wish Uncle Henry and Aunt Em there with her.
@widowmaker7831 Жыл бұрын
@@jburger84 Scarecrow is a man made of Straw=Strawman its a legal fiction, the song even states he'd unravel every riddle if he only had a brain. Paper Strawmen don't have brains and we are deceived via that status on paper. This whole movie is a reference to the gold heist, the Bricks are yellow bricks (Gold bricks) they are the stolen bricks leading to the Emerald City Emerald being Green the color of what we know as the dollar bill or federal reserve note is also Green, the Wizard of Ounces OZ is depicted to weight of gold. for paper certificates. The original book she wore Silver Slippers because silver was the hope of reclaiming what was lost to the Fed. Now they are Ruby Red depicting Blood. This movie does have a real set meaning and its very detailed and wicked when you understand it. It involves how we were all enslaved under the "Privately owned Federal Reserve Banks" This happened in Kansas as it was considered "The Heart of America" and this was a strike to the Heart of the country. This was all to clear to the older generations whom lived through what happened in the great depression a calculated event that was carried out to steal the gold reserves of America making the currency worthless.
@WillyMcBiggs Жыл бұрын
The scarecrow tin man and lion represent thought emotion and action or mind spirit and body. Hence if I only had a brain heart and nerve. When your thoughts emotions and actions are aligned you are bound to accomplish what you set out to do. This is also the trinities in all of religion! The Father the Holy Spirit and the son.
@MaskedMan66 Жыл бұрын
They didn't "represent" anything. They were just three interesting characters out of hundreds that Baum ultimately created.
@realdealastrology95 ай бұрын
What people absolutely fail to notice is that this movie is all about death, the afterlife, past lives, and future lives. It literally proves that there is life after death, which is why I watch this movie religiously at least once or twice a week. It's that powerful, and it enthralls the masses because of its grip on the human unconscious. The tornado symbolizes the act of death and the turbulence associated with it. When Dorothy gets hit with the windows, the death process begins. We see within the tornado all the people who mean the most to her, both her family and her main enemy (the Wicked Witch). This is called visioning, which happens during the dying process, and you actually see what's to come (symbolized by the changing of Ms. Gulch to the Witch), and meanwhile, the ones she loves just take different forms in the next life but are the same at their core. It's also extremely important to know that L. Frank Baum was a theosophist. What is theosophy? "Theosophy holds a monist position that there exists a single divine Absolute and articulates an emanationist cosmology in which the universe is perceived as outward reflections from this Absolute. The purpose of human life is spiritual emancipation and the human soul undergoes reincarnation upon bodily death according to a process of karma." Furthermore, the slogan for theosophy is "There is no religion higher than truth." ----- "There is no place like home." NEED I SAY MORE? Absolutely not. I just nailed the exact interpretation of this movie according to L. Frank Baum. You're welcome!!! Hopefully, my revelation here causes millions of people to see this movie in a brand new light.
@bradybrady78934 ай бұрын
eh, i think this is a REACH.
@realdealastrology94 ай бұрын
@@bradybrady7893 not at all. Those who think so are incapable of comprehending it. Not my problem :)
@bradybrady78934 ай бұрын
@@realdealastrology9 well that’s quite a pretentious thing to say. Everybody gains different things out of movies and sees their own symbolism. I just felt that the movie didn’t really show anything pointing towards your analysis. The thing you said about the tornado can make sense but tbh lots of things can be made to symbolize death. It could just be a tornado not meant to symbolize anything. If you really want to prove your point you could go more in depth. you really only discussed the tornado sequence and the parallel characters in oz. However, there’s still a whole movie. for example, What does the whole journey in oz symbolize in the “death process”? what does the ending symbolize? you seem very full of yourself so i’d love to hear your response. I could very well be wrong i only said I THINK your opinion is a reach so i would love for you to change my mind.
@realdealastrology94 ай бұрын
@@bradybrady7893 im not here to change your mind. 4 other people obviously agree with me based on their likes. That’s 4 up on you (1). Therefore, further discussing this just to convince you is totally a waste of energy. Thanks for your input.
@bradybrady78934 ай бұрын
@@realdealastrology9 oh i wasn’t really looking for you to “convince” me. you were just so full of yourself and confident in your opinion i thought you might want to elaborate. especially because your argument is REALLY weak with what little you have said. but i suppose your right. your massive 4 likes really validate your opinion!!
@keysersoze7213Ай бұрын
White Witch = 33 Tornado = whirlwind "Prince of the power of the Air.
@Halfscotboy_397 ай бұрын
ITS A FILM FGS!!!! JUST WATCH IT TO ENJOY IT... DON'T PSYCHOANALIZE IT!!!!! 🙄😒😤
@MaskedMan664 ай бұрын
It was a book first, then a stage play, and then several movies.
@greggmckenzie7132Ай бұрын
Animal-Vegetable-Mineral = Lion-Scarecrow-Tinman = Mercury-Sulphur-Salt = Body-Mind-Spirit - the REAL trinity!
@thirdstrikesupreme60083 жыл бұрын
I noticed none of this... Am I an idiot?
@NiniExtreme3 жыл бұрын
Yea
@MaskedMan66 Жыл бұрын
No, because none of this is valid.
@MaskedMan664 ай бұрын
@jeffw5392 Word!
@davidvasey50652 ай бұрын
Where tf did you go mate
@majkus Жыл бұрын
Can you supply a reference to an article or other writing contemporary with the release of the 1939 film that shows that it 'communicated' any of these social ideas to its audience?
@MaskedMan664 ай бұрын
No, because it's all nonsense.
@Timeless8888 Жыл бұрын
I can’t do his voice at all. Next !😂
@paulcongdon2163 Жыл бұрын
That's a version. I've seen a perhaps more accurate version
@jonathanfarrell2378 Жыл бұрын
Interesting perspective. Yet the film is only a portion of what author Frank L Baum wrote. In many ways the film omits the complexity of the Wizard of Oz series of books.
@angelafuller87468 ай бұрын
There's a series?
@jonathanfarrell23788 ай бұрын
@@angelafuller8746 There’s a series of books, “Return to Oz” etc. see more info at Wikipedia link en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Oz_books
@MaskedMan664 ай бұрын
What complexity? The books are just fun, exciting, pun-filled children's tales.
@MaskedMan664 ай бұрын
@@angelafuller8746 There are forty Oz books of which "The Wonderful Wizard of Oz" is the first. L. Frank Baum wrote the first fourteen, then after he died, his widow gave permission for the series to continue. Ruth Plumly Thompson wrote a further nineteen, John R. Neill, who illustrated most of the books, wrote three, Jack Snow wrote two, Rachel Cosgrove wrote one, and the final Oz book, "Merry Go Round in Oz," was written by Eloise Jarvis McGraw and her daughter Lauren.
@MaishaMH Жыл бұрын
Interesting! I like your perspectives. For me, my catch was spiritual 😮
@MaskedMan664 ай бұрын
It's all rubbish.
@galvinstanley3235 Жыл бұрын
The first time i watched it as a kid,i always knew something was very strange about this movie,i just didn't know what.
@MaskedMan664 ай бұрын
How about a living scarecrow, a man made out of tin, a talking lion, witches, sentient trees, monkeys with wings, etc. etc. etc????
@wizardscrollstudioАй бұрын
None of this is confirmed.
@therealhouseofpop729 Жыл бұрын
great video!!! wow at the munchkin part. i had no idea.
@MaskedMan664 ай бұрын
It's all rubbish.
@SethMacLeod95 Жыл бұрын
Very well done. As a Christian this helped me! Great work. New subscriber!
@MaskedMan664 ай бұрын
How in the world has this helped you as a Christian? Especially since it's all rubbish?
@SethMacLeod954 ай бұрын
@@MaskedMan66 learning what the occult, Magick, and witchcraft is truly like. It’s evil and makes me grateful for the Lord Jesus Christ and what He did for us
@MaskedMan664 ай бұрын
@@SethMacLeod95 None of which has anything to do with Oz. It's all fantasy magic (not "magick," whatever that silly respelling is supposed to signify, if anything). As a Christian myself, it's never bothered me in the least-- and by the way, this video is full of nonsense.
@SethMacLeod954 ай бұрын
@@MaskedMan66 “he who has ears to hear, let him hear” discernment my friend. As both believers in the Lord Jesus we should not be against each other. God bless you 🙏
@MaskedMan664 ай бұрын
@@SethMacLeod95 I'm not against you. I'm just saying that you don't need to be against this harmless little story that's been loved by generations for 124 years.
@shakespearaamina9117 Жыл бұрын
Thank you
@NewWorldDAO2 жыл бұрын
This is written by a consortium of dead writers including Harper Lee on it’s about everybody in the world moving to the Midwest and stop trying to look for dreams and other places no place like home Kansas Midwest
@MaskedMan662 ай бұрын
The book was written by L. Frank Baum, who also wrote thirteen of its thirty-nine sequels.
@tommysimpson74597 ай бұрын
What about the pitiful Cowardly Lion was always too frightened to stand up for himself. Of course, he was a bully and a big mouth when it came to picking on those smaller than he was. They act as if they have great courage, they really have none at all. All roar with no teeth of authority to back them up. When push came to shove, the Cowardly Lion always buckled under and whimpered when anyone of any size or stature challenged him. He wanted courage from the Grand Wizard, so he was awarded a medal of “official” recognition. Now, regardless of how much of a coward he still was, his official status made him a bully with officially recognized authority. He’s just like the attorneys who hide behind the Middle Courts of the Temple Bar. What about the trip through the field of poppies? They weren’t real people, so drugs had no effect on them.
@MaskedMan664 ай бұрын
Completely wrong. The Lion is cowardly, which means he's easily frightened, but he is no coward. If it's just him in danger, he'll run for his life (which is only sensible), but if someone else is in danger, he will fight to the death-- and that shows that he truly does have courage. All of the travelers already have whet they think they require, and that is the whole point of the story. "Middle Courts?" "Temple Bar?" What is all that?
@douglasbroccone3144 Жыл бұрын
It was about the Crime of 1873
@MaskedMan66 Жыл бұрын
Oy.....
@triannamag48666 ай бұрын
Ha ha….. come on…. Worse analysis I’ve seen
@chingogongus41183 жыл бұрын
Dude are you okay...? I know we don't know each other personally but if you ever need someone to talk to I'm right here.... I don't want to come off as confrontational or rude or anything but I think you might have a problem with your weight. Again I'm here to talk if you need to. I've been through obesity problems myself and it's a journey but I know you can make it through! The world has a way of always working these things out. Please, before you create another video focus on yourself rather than pouring your heart into video essays. Even just a change in diet can make a drastic difference, maybe substitute a chocolate bar with a healthy snack like a banana? Your personal health means a lot to me, and I know it'll be difficult. Weight loss is a massive challenge but if I could do it, you can too! I believe in you man. Best of luck, Chingo
@TheSapphireLeo Жыл бұрын
Well, non-junk vegan and for the animals, themselves should fix that in just an raw, washed, ripe green+ alkaline fruits, to juiced, until wanting to dry fast will help that?
@Sthism3 жыл бұрын
To put it simply, you lost me in the last 5 seconds of the essay, so I didn't really understand the whole meaning of it. Additionally the movie has been ruined for me. I give this analysis 1938/1940 it alright.
@ahabduennschitz76702 жыл бұрын
To put it simply, your Comment is irrational Horseshit
@MaskedMan66 Жыл бұрын
Nothing ever ruined the movie for Judy Garland; she loved it all her life.
@MaskedMan664 ай бұрын
@jeffw5392 I don't recall ever hearing of her complaining about that; after all, nobody ever suspected that the movie would one day be the multigenerational phenomenon that it became.
@jefflrfe4 ай бұрын
@@MaskedMan66 Jack Paar: They show that movie every year -- that must cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. Garland: Yeah? Where's the money?
@MaskedMan664 ай бұрын
@@jefflrfe Sher was joking. She did that a lot.
@Marty.-iy9hwАй бұрын
Wrong... don't waste your time. Find the truth to set you free
@Wargasm544 ай бұрын
You’ve been sniffing too many bicycle seats 😂. Worst analysis of all time.
@Elk-_- Жыл бұрын
10/10 review
@michaelsmyth56584 ай бұрын
Propaganda ?
@Marty.-iy9hwАй бұрын
Wrong
@Shroomania2 жыл бұрын
Oh shit mate.. nice try.. hahaaaa
@robbieanson12182 ай бұрын
I am not gonna give you like to this video. How dare you to make this as a video and contrast to Adolf Hitler and the war at that time that has nothing to do with the movie. And I know it. I grew up in the 1980s and watching this film, you called this the truth of Wizard of Oz. No it is what you want it to be as your truth. Then you are entitled to your opinion about this movie, but that does not. to excuse you from making this movie as racial and it’s not that at all. any better understand this we do me like video about someone like this. You better have evidence to back it up not just you saying it. i’m not saying lose the video it’s fine. I don’t mind video. I just don’t really like the idea of you turning a movie like this being a racial and related to Adolf Hitler and the war from that time periods from then so you can’t just do that without extra what the movie stands for and what is supposed to be about us What you think what is supposed to be about and it’s not the way that you’re saying it to be you’re putting the world war 2 as a construct to the film and it’s not that so get that out of your head, but take this as me giving you constructive criticism because you are wrong to make this kind of a video not because your opinion is fine that’s what you constructed. The video is wrong and quitting the world war being a part of it that’s just wrong but you’re not all that wrong because it was around that time. The movie has nothing to do with it. That is where I find you being wrong. Stop that about my comment if you want because I grow up in the 1980s , watching this movie certain grandparent home so I’m just saying you might wanna make this video again I’m not saying delete this one just saying just say next time next time you’re gonna hear more than just this I’m someone that knows what you mean by it, but has nothing to do with the movie that is where I find you being wrong in that area, so just be careful next time this is just a fair warning and you are wrong. The world war and the racial attentions has nothing to do with it. Same thing for circus sideshow it has nothing really to do with us but yet you're right and I'm mostly wrong, so you can't just say just if you want your video and we need you to explain it better for the next time I am just giving you a friendly warning about this that you are wrong to bring very much race related and also with the world war that has nothing to do with this that's why I find you wrong so if you want to explain better, then do it
@blakemonast50258 ай бұрын
But if it’s all a made up place in her head what was the point of making oz the great and powerful? If oz is a made up place in her head then that movie is worthless
@shawn36935 ай бұрын
it's an allegory of how the american people were enslaved when the US went off the gold standard. dollars were backed by people not gold. Toto means everything. The cowardly lion represents the american people, the straw and tin men represent the "person". Follow the yellow brick road means follow the gold. Our gold was stolen and we were enslaved by fear. you see, Our "forefathers" set us up: This is Section 1 of Virginia Declaration of Rights. It predates the Constitution for the United States: "That all [flesh-and-blood] men [and women] are by nature [created by God] equally free and independent [personal sovereignty], and have certain inherent [natural, God-given] rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society [legal definition of society is a collective organization of corporations; ie fictitious entities; ie the matrix], they cannot, by any compact [contract] deprive or divest their posterity [of such rights, only themselves]; namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety." The bill of rights only applies to people; men and women. The word "person" is defined as a corporation, when you are a member of society; i.e., person, individual, us citizen, driver, taxpayer, etc etc etc, it is the avatar that exists in society, avatars have privileges because only flesh-and-blood people can have natural rights. technically, we have no constitutional rights because the constitution merely Affirms natural rights, whatever "constitutional" rights there are have been statutized into privileges for the avatar. When a baby is born, the bankrupt US Govt creates a corporation using the baby's name in all capital letters. it then uses the corporation as collateral to get a loan from the (private front company) federal reserve represented as federal reserve notes "dollars". People are the sureties for the "US citizen" corporation. Debt is transferred to people this way, police are revenue enforcers of the bankruptcy. This is the legal framework of our ensalvement since 1933. we went from the gold standard to the private faith and credit/future performance of the american people, that's why she called Neo "coppertop" in The Matrix --modern allegory of same thing, our energy is being stolen. "The validity of the public debt of the United States...shall not be questioned." 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, Section 4 also, when cops ask you something, ask them if they are making a request or demand. if a request, you can deny the request, if they are making a demand, there is a statute that gives the officer the authority to make such a demand. every crime is a commercial crime since it has value for the creditors of the bankrupt gov. attorneys ensure that debt gets transferred--"attorn" means "to transfer"! People in prison are collateral for municipal bonds. Cops aren't taught, they are trained. Rights are nothing mean nothing unless you assert them. We don't have constitutional rights, we have natural rights. People are flesh and blood men and women; persons are fictitious entities. We are conditioned to believe lies while we are led to the slaughterhouse.
@MaskedMan664 ай бұрын
It's only in the MGM movie that Dorothy dreams the whole adventure; in the books, Oz is real.
@MaskedMan664 ай бұрын
@jeffw5392 Miss Gulch had her leg broken by a falling telegraph pole during the storm, so while she'd on the mend, the Gales will settle things with the Sheriff, who, in all likelihood, only gave Miss G the order to get her out of his office.
@NiniExtreme3 жыл бұрын
Bahaha!!
@NewWorldDAO2 жыл бұрын
My ex-husband killed two of my dogs know I have another one missing
@frankl19558 ай бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/bJbbnmV-npdrjtk ... Too Funny!