This is why you don't hire an architect to do a civil engineer's job.
@nicholasdowns35027 ай бұрын
RCE would be proud of you!
@wta15187 ай бұрын
No, this is why you don't hire an architect.
@AngelWedge7 ай бұрын
@@nicholasdowns3502 Apparently KZbin is reading my comments; because despite being subscribed to him it hasn't shown me any of RCE's content for a couple of months,and after posting this it did.
@RFC35147 ай бұрын
I'm not sure selection of lighthouse locations is part of a civil engineering course. The issue wasn't with the construction. What they needed was a _surveyor._
@EdinMike7 ай бұрын
As an Architect Technician… I agree ! 😂
@Mackarony57 ай бұрын
Just so everyone knows, the Tasman Sea is between Australia and New Zealand. The stretch of water between the mainland of Australia and Tasmania is called Bass Strait.
@Camxaiver7 ай бұрын
Looked to be on the NSW coast, not Tasmanian…
@Mackarony57 ай бұрын
@@Camxaiver Yeah, that makes sense given that the majority of the Tasman Sea is on the NSW coast, with only a portion of it situated off the northeastern tip of Tasmania. It's named after the explorer Abel Tasman, not because it divides the Australian mainland and Tasmania. simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tasman_Sea
@Henrex20003 ай бұрын
@@Mackarony5so like Washington DC and Washington state?
@winkletter7 ай бұрын
"It is a brutal bit of water, that." Such a British, gentlemanly thing for Tom to say.
@aomrulestotally7 ай бұрын
"Even after decommissioning, the lighthouse continued to cause navigational problems especially on moonlit nights when the golden sandstone tower glowed in the dark. So near the turn of the century, the tower was reduced to rubble to prevent any further disaster."
@amandajones88417 ай бұрын
"As a result, the Cape St George Tower was unceremoniously used from 1917 to 1922 for target practice by the Royal Australian Navy and destroyed." It was so bad they shelled it from the sea.
@samuelmellars78557 ай бұрын
@@amandajones8841 that is amazing! I wish there was some record of whatever meeting was held where they decided "it's a hazard, we should remove it" and then went through the options and decided "Well the RAN boys have got big guns and are looking for an excuse to use them, just tell them to shell the damn thing!"
@IceMetalPunk7 ай бұрын
"What quarrel do you have with my lighthouse, might I ask?" "See, the thing about lighthouses that makes them useful... is that people can *see them from the water.* " "...now you're just being greedy."
@pallasproserpina41187 ай бұрын
the "freshly-hewn stone" bit plus the discussion about him owning a salvage business made me think that he might have owned the quarry or the masonry company
@danyunowork7 ай бұрын
The 'fresh' part led me to think it was good when first built but got worse as the stone dried out or shifted.
@DeGuerre7 ай бұрын
Point of order, the Tasman Sea is the bit between Australia and New Zealand. Cape St George is in one of the more obscure legal jurisdictions in Australia. It used to be the only piece of coastline that was part of the ACT, now Jervis Bay Territory.
@whophd7 ай бұрын
**cringing in Australian** people getting Tasman Sea confused with Bass Strait again
@nicolaplays11347 ай бұрын
And pronouncing it incorrectly :( (TAZ-mən)
@Snowshowslow7 ай бұрын
Name stupid names, win stupid prizes? 😉
@maqusan227 ай бұрын
I've seen weather segments on Australian news get this wrong before.
@ichVII7 ай бұрын
@@Snowshowslow That reminds me of kzbin.info/www/bejne/moClmZlum5yWjq8 Its a sketch by Mitchell and Webb about stupid place names and a funny reinvision of how those names came to be.
@saoirsedeltufo74365 ай бұрын
Yeah I was wondering if Tom would know it and point it out but alas
@Epinardscaramel7 ай бұрын
"lighthouse attached to the back of a cow" sounds like a Citation Needed bit 🥰😄
@qwertyTRiG7 ай бұрын
Was the cow juggling?
@daniellemurnett25345 ай бұрын
See this is the real debate we should be having. Was it on a cow that was juggling in an office chair, or was it on a donkey in a cart headed towards an extremely dangerous loop the loop?
@cyberfutur50007 ай бұрын
Hmm, given him being an architect it probably focused the heat of the sun into a death ray of sorts and burned them down while parked.
@empath697 ай бұрын
no, that would be an engineer - an architect would merely make a *pretty* lighthouse that's pleasing to look at but in fact no use at all (which turned out to be the case, but not because of the *design* itself...)
@masansr7 ай бұрын
Was it just a blue canary in the outlet by the light-switch?
@crash.override7 ай бұрын
Who watches over you.
@AngelWedge7 ай бұрын
Not to put too fine a point on it
@PhilipStorry7 ай бұрын
Say I'm the only bee in your bonnet...
@PhilipStorry7 ай бұрын
Make a little bird house in your soul...
@AliDave6 ай бұрын
Filibuster vigilantly
@rincewindtvd7 ай бұрын
The captions have different colours for each person, and are moved so they don't overlay text areas. First time I've seen anything like that on KZbin, fantastic work. Also interesting fact!
@fsodn7 ай бұрын
Yeah; the company that Tom uses for his high-end captioning is really great. I've used them for a video myself. Excellent quality work.
@hadinossanosam44597 ай бұрын
Pretty much any of Tom's videos have amazing subtitles, because he cares about accessibility and pays someone to make proper subtitles for all his videos - with color-coding for people, placement to avoid overlapping, and even pronunciation details for jokes/weird sounds/... . My favourite subtitles are on the Tom Scott plus episode with Beardyman, it has all the beatboxing transcribed as IPA! :)
@AngelWedge7 ай бұрын
You can tell when somebody really cares about accessibility :) I read a news article today about a sculpture which has alt text (a sign describing it, I think with a QR code for an audio description), and how this is a great step forward for accessibility… but the news site didn't think to add alt text to their photo of the sign (which was too small for me to see clearly, and like many websites doesn't allow zooming in on mobile)
@mittfh7 ай бұрын
A new cycleway / footpath / nature trail has just opened next to me, and while the "adult" signs are standard, there's also a set of wooden sculptures illustrating the tale of Horace the Hedgehog, with the accompanying caption signs (at a Child-friendly height) written in both English and Braille.
@pascalejacquelinepetit51317 ай бұрын
Loved the humour and interaction of the team! Great episode!
@George_vv7 ай бұрын
The tiny lighthouse thing is pretty much the ending scene of the Truman Show. A classic painting of a tunnel on a brick wall in the sea.
@jamietus10127 ай бұрын
Ah, listening to 3 people who don't know much about navigation talk about lighthouses was amusing. Also, Tom getting the ferry to Tasmania through the bass strait and the tasman sea confused was quite amusing. But for not knowing navigation, they asked some decent questions, very entertaining episode
@Stirdix7 ай бұрын
My thought was that the stone was magnetic and screwing with ship compasses
@MrDannyDetail7 ай бұрын
I was thinking along the lines of the stone containing iron ore, but I just thought it might have rapidly gone rusty in the salty sea air.
@AxolotlPeet7 ай бұрын
The lighthouse on Lundy Island in the Bristol Channel (UK) was built too high up and kept being obscured by the sea fog. It's now been replaced by a lighthouse at either end of the island.
@korumann7 ай бұрын
The idea of smaller lighthouses nearer the shore isn't as far-fetched as you might think. In the great lakes region on particularly rocky sections of the shore they have "lower lights" placed at even intervals to help ships avoid the hazards. This got turned into a sermon, and a hymn "Let The Lower Lights Be Burning" a.k.a. "Brightly Beams Our Fathers Mercy"
@oscarramage957 ай бұрын
Before I heard the answer, I was assuming he’d built at the bottom of the cliff instead of the top
@Slikx6667 ай бұрын
I was thinking about the code that the light gives out being the same as another lighthouse just along the coast. Yet again i was wrong. 🥴
@brontewcat7 ай бұрын
The lighthouse is actually on the southern point of Jervis Bay on the coast of NSW, not near Tasmania at all.
@IOSALive7 ай бұрын
Lateral with Tom Scott, Subscribed because your content is fantastic!
@stevemoore127 ай бұрын
I guessed he built a replica of a different lighthouse to trick ships into docking in his port
@PaulOllech6 ай бұрын
I was kinda hoping this was about the Triangle Island lighthouse off the coast of British Columbia, which was abandoned for being too hostile for human life.
@treasurerFinleyASC6 ай бұрын
Cape St. George isn't in Tasmania. It is in New South Wales, South of Sydney. From a qualified civil engineer (who did not learn how to build lighthouses either!)
@TheScarvig7 ай бұрын
i would have kinda expected it to be located in an island where while its correct for the side of the island its standing on the island is so small that ships on the other side of the island could still see it and wrecked on the other side of the island because of it
@VulcanTrekkie457 ай бұрын
My guess was that he purposely built an inadequate lighthouse to purposely sink ships on the rocks, because a lot of coastal communities like that will often see shipwrecks as a good thing and go loot them in short order.
@deebea63647 ай бұрын
Always love seeing lateral uploads!
@sophiamarchildon39987 ай бұрын
Initial thoughts: he had the lighthouse built "in the middle of the water" on some hard to safely reach/work tumultuous shallows (e.g. middle of a tidal bay surrounded by rocks). And they were suspicious of him because he had a big involvement in the quarry, ship, or building industries, generating himself big money with such ludicrous project. The shipwrecks were not because the lighthouse was not operating correctly or otherwise misleading. They rather happened during construction of the lighthouse itself.
@tomskih2037 ай бұрын
One of my favourite podcasts.
@timschommer85487 ай бұрын
My bet: The lighthouse was in such a location that ships would be drawn into a reef or similar, wrecking the ship. Investigators suspected him because he chose the location for the lighthouse.
@PianoKwanMan7 ай бұрын
Why were investigators suspicious of Dawson, though?
@lucbloom7 ай бұрын
Plain incompetence? Lazy stone movement? Yea pretty vague
@llearch7 ай бұрын
According to a quick google search (and some reading between the lines): some civil engineers reviewed his plan, were concerned, and looked into it further. It was then objected to... and the local authority went ahead with it anyway for "reasons unknown", which sounds a lot to me like some shady backroom deals went on, and someone retired with a much fatter wallet and a hopefully very guilty conscience.
@Rollermonkey17 ай бұрын
Wrong color lens? red vs green? Bad sectors? Inappropriate flashing pattern?
@expectationlost7 ай бұрын
"uproariously"
@Schmidtelpunkt7 ай бұрын
Why is Stuart Goldsmith not more often on panel shows?
@waves_under_stars7 ай бұрын
I guessed it was about the tide
@Tosty_827 ай бұрын
Jumped in on the magical 1337 views
@mhelvens7 ай бұрын
A clear case of the Sunk Cost Fallacy. 😏
@20storiesunder7 ай бұрын
Hehe
@suNn.K.O7 ай бұрын
Tazz Man.
@DanielKolbin7 ай бұрын
hmmmmm
@quintuscrinis7 ай бұрын
It took 24 shipwrecks before they did anything to fix the situation? Excuse me for asking but isn't that a tiny bit wreckless given a lighthouse is supposed to make an area wreck less ships?
@RFC35147 ай бұрын
It's the opposite of _wreckless._
@pattheplanter7 ай бұрын
@@RFC3514 The OED has this, from 1596 on. Wreckful: Causing shipwreck, ruin, or disaster; dangerous, destructive. Reckless is a different matter, from reck - to take care, notice, be troubled by.
@whophd7 ай бұрын
@@pattheplanteryou wreckon?
@pattheplanter7 ай бұрын
@@whophd It is no reak.
@geoffroi-le-Hook7 ай бұрын
Sophie is so fair
@danielleoliver17346 ай бұрын
The sr hire T picked the location, they can’t be trusted to know where to build these things.