As an argentinian, i have to say this is very accurate, objective, and also well presented . Congrats!
@asdrubalanibal68533 жыл бұрын
San Martin was not ‘dispatched’ to the Uruguayan border, neither ‘to take care’ of the Royalist stronghold. The ‘royalist stronghold’ was the city of Montevideo, in what is now Uruguay, which was under land siege by the independentist forces of General Artigas. The Royalists forces were sending raiding parties seizing supples from population centers along the Paraná River, deep into enemy territory. San Martin was sent to fight against, and to stop, these royalists raiding parties. The Battle of San Lorenzo happened over 200 miles away from the Uruguayan border, almost 400 miles from Montevideo, the Spanish royalists troops failed in the attempted raid, and retreated by the river they came from. So yes it was the first argentine military victory in Argentine soil.
@mrbaudolino46783 жыл бұрын
This is a great topic, no very abundant on the english language. Thanks for making it, greetings from Peru
@el_Contra2 жыл бұрын
see part 1 and part 2 .... kzbin.info/www/bejne/fWirk3tvmcyola8
@marly1719.2 жыл бұрын
El general Don Jose de San Martin, Libertador del PERU. Siempre!!!!!! Arriba Argentina!!!
@axeld9611 Жыл бұрын
XD
@faustoneitor14 жыл бұрын
cool vid bro, greeting from argentina
@dontforgetmyname80453 жыл бұрын
lmao
@RioNuevoIzabal2 жыл бұрын
Great history video!! Gracias!!
@Grequierecafe4 жыл бұрын
I appreciate your attention to this under-treated subject. (You could work on your pronunciation of certain words such as Bolívar--pretty important.) Thank you for your efforts.
@huilenfrias3 жыл бұрын
Quizás te faltó leer una parte de la historia. You should read more about San Martin. Saludos desde Argentina.
@josevischi91803 жыл бұрын
Hablo la erudita.....
@brunogalvez96442 жыл бұрын
que falto? para mi quedo lo mas importante
@inunionandfreedom48432 жыл бұрын
@@brunogalvez9644 La guerra civil que llevó San Martín al exilio al no querer luchar contra sus "hermanos" y que las ideas de San Martín para una monarquía constitucional en el Peru no eran antiguas, eran el mejor cambio para una sociedad que vivió con una monarquia absoluta por 300 años, y que las republicas solo llevarían a un caos como pasó en la vida real.
@el_Contra2 жыл бұрын
Nice effort, but very superficial and full of personal opinions... thanks anyway.
@commonsensewisdom6252 жыл бұрын
Constitutional monarch like UK may be better for Argentina and other SA countries.
@mariadelrosarioacevedo6858 Жыл бұрын
Los monarcas están al pedo, eso de que son elegidos por dios es un cuento, la democracia total y la sinceridad política es lo que cada país necesita
@matute93 Жыл бұрын
As an Argentine I completly agree, our country has everything to be a rich one, but almost half of the population is poor because of selfish populist politicians and political inestability, having the figure of a constitutional monarch could have reduced the dissasters our regular politicians did to our economy, being completly free to destroy the future to "buy" an election.
@AlessandroZir3 жыл бұрын
u definitely sound like a logic owl!! ☺️
@josevischi91803 жыл бұрын
Argenzuela made a mistake being independant. Argenzuela now days whoud be working with euros if they were keep in the spanisch side.
@jaguarmemez3 жыл бұрын
It just sounds like Venezuela and Argentina combined
@josevischi91803 жыл бұрын
@@jaguarmemez there is.
@dontforgetmyname80453 жыл бұрын
@@josevischi9180 lol what?
@jmargento2 жыл бұрын
Pecetas
@Sketchy0002 жыл бұрын
@@josevischi9180 You can't be more fucking stupid ¿are you even from Argentina or Venezuela to say that nonsense with such confidence? If you don't stay out of the fucking way, YOU-DON'T-UN-DER-STAND-US