A Book of Acts Paradigm

[@Esther23Project]

This was an Education that The entire church needs! I will be listening to this over and over again until it is imprinted on my heart and my mind. I want to know in whom I have believed, I want to share truth with those that do not know. Shared and saved!

[@saav7778]

Thoroughly enjoyed every minute of it! The Apostolic community needs more like this. The Biblos Network is just the best 🔥

[@TruckinDude85]

Excellent video Pastor Urshan. Nice and thorough. So good! I appreciate how long it was. Awesome

[@thatgeneguy8882]

Thank you, Jesus, for this amazing message.

[@1FloGlo]

Amazing... Hallelujah 🙌🏾🙌🏾🙌🏾🙌🏾🙏🏽 Thank You Bro. Nathaniel for taking the time to breakdown The ACTS Paradigm. This is such a soul saving important topic and I didn't care to stay up way past my bedtime too... because I hungered to know and understand it all; so I can be a better Witness to others. I too just LOVE to "brag about Jesus". In Jesus holy precious healing saving name we stay in faithful prayer AMEN 🙏🏽

[@kyleringeisen4750]

“You will know them by the fruit they bare.” If you say you believe, and you truly have received the word, your actions or works will testify of this.

[@Robertsrex941]

Thank you !!!

[@danielgc1970]

Really appreciate you taking the time to lay this out so definitively. It's a revelation that God makes available to all of mankind. God bless the Biblos Network in Jesus name 🙏

[@jeremiahsmith323]

You guys are amazing love listening to these at work.

[@dorareaves7916]

Awesome time,

[@elainecasteel9488]

Love this teaching

[@barsharonabarsharona8178]

LOVE your teaching & insights. And so impressed re. your comments on our Shema and the Oneness of G-d! Also the UPC almost never mentions the relationship between the mikveh and Apostolic baptism. Todah rabah.

[@buckeyewill2166]

God bless you, Brother. We need more teaching like this.

[@5warpotentials258]

Is there a part 2 ? I need more of this teaching

[@miztx2syuiip590]

In Jesus Name Amen

[@joesanmiguel9682]

Noah going into the ark and going through the water was an example for us of future baptism. Everything has a spiritual experience. Or like the brother is saying , a paradigm.

[@an_nie_dyc1386]

The ark is the name of Jesus

[@loisross7590]

Hey Pastor Urshan... Is there any way I could get a transcript of this? It's amazing!

[@MarcMeal]

I know this comment is a year old but there's a transcript in the description.

[@joesanmiguel9682]

God speaks those things that are not as though they are. God knows our past and he knows our future. He knows our thoughts afar off . Meaning he knows whether we are going to obey in the future or not.

[@Post-Trib]

If Noah believed God but didn't build the ark, would that have saved him? Noah believed & worked that wood into an ark & was saved

[@dougfuller6258]

In Acts 1:1 the first three words in the KJV version are "The Former Treatise' Defined in the Greek as "Definitive Supreme Divine Expression Of Jesus Christ." The remainder of the scripture focuses that definition upon " all that Jesus both to do and teach." Jude 3 tells us to "Earnestly contend for the faith once delivered. There's only a 1.0 version. No updates needed!

[@samuelknipp6978]

Rev. 3:14: thus saith the Faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God. ( what is the beginning of the creation.)

[@yeahboyoboy]

"And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God" My take on it is this: The beginning is Christ, but "in the beginning was the "LOGOS" and the Logos was with God and the Logos WAS God...from John 1:1 I think that using the word "Word" is a horrible translation since "logos" means so many things and word is just a non-descript to us. I think the best is the idea of "plan" "purpose" "reason" "voice" and yes, that "Voice" would be an absolute "proclamation" of all that is to be, the "Amen" (stamp of 'so be it') Faithful and True because He finished what He started and planned from the foundations of the earth. He is the Alpha and the Omega and bore witness of Himself. Therefore the "beginning" as in "In the Beginning..." has a greater meaning than simply "Word" which, as I mentioned, to us is not a powerful word and is vague...and so where it says "the beginning of the creation of God" that Logos, which is later named "Jesus" or "Salvation" is the name above all other created names and yes, in a sense He (Jesus) as the Son of Man was created as was "the plan" and the execution of that plan from start to finish" but His eternal existence was simply God and Creator. Those are my thoughts on it. Hope that helps.

[@dougfuller6258]

The Greek word for Baptism is Baptizo meaning fully wet, fully submerged as a sunken ship. The ship is your old man’s sins remitted or forgiven. Only in Jesus Name.

[@KellyRice-o5x]

Today is 10/2024 and there is a post on fb today that fb is removing all apostolic content.

[@coltonlambert552]

35:21

[@KellyRice-o5x]

Should I share this video to a non denominational person that doesn't believe like we do? Just give me a thumbs up or down

[@twylavarn]

Thank you so much ! Are the notes available on this teaching?

[@berthalime5517]

RIALTO, CALIFORNIA

[@joesanmiguel9682]

Abraham was justified by obeying God and offering his son. So his faith was made complete.

[@joerod5621]

Brother Nathan, Im a oneness! The word became flesh! When the human speaks, is it entirely God or just a man? The body in the tumb was it God or was it just another body? Jesus said; destroy this temple and (I) will rise it back up! J2:19 Jesus said I was dead, but now I’m alive! R1:18 They will look up on me (God) and mourn for him (Jesus) whom they pierced! Z12:10 same self person! To me, God died in his human existence, but the ground could not hold him! At the beginning of the video you describe separation! We know the word became flesh! And now that flesh is glorified! We do not know Jesus in the flesh any longer, but in the spirit!

[@yeahboyoboy]

I really like your teaching and I believe in speaking in tongues because it is Scriptural, but Acts 2 is different than all the others and different from what Paul spoke about after the fact. The Day of Pentecost was a special instance of tongues. 3 things happened: 1) Mighty Rushing Wind 2) Cloven "tongues" of "fire" as in a "split flame" that rested upon each of them and 3) They all spoke in an unknown tongue to each of them, but also every tongue spoken was of a KNOWN language in the world, thus this would enable these tongues to be thus "interpreted," something I think Paul said not to do (speak in tongues w/out an interpreter). So if I were to follow your logic regarding "salvation" can only happen by having an Acts 2 experience, then I would dare say, no one since that time has ever been saved...unless you can tell me that all three things happened exactly as on the Day of Pentecost to you and those in your church, etc. and remember besides fire and wind, the tongues MUST BE a real, viable KNOWN language like French, Spanish, Korean, Japanese, etc. but unknown to the speaker (ergo a miracle and definitely by the Spirit). Just sayin'

[@aaronleet9606]

1 cor 14:2 for he that speaketh in an UNKNOWN TONGUE speaketh not unto men, but unto God: FOR NO MAN UNDERSTANDETH HIM; howbeit in THE SPIRIT he SPEAKETH MYSTERIES. Jude 1:20 “But ye, beloved, building up yourselves on your most holy faith, PRAYING IN THE HY GHOST”. Speaking in tongues I for every believer and it doesn't have to be a known language as these scriptures clearly state.

[@yeahboyoboy]

@@aaronleet9606 I don't think you followed what I was saying...the logic of it and the confusion of it, anyway. You are saying it is unknown to men "FOR NO MAN UNDERSTANDETH HIM" but in Acts 2 (what you and other "CLAIM" to have) it was a language KNOWN TO MEN, i.e., men hearing understood men speaking. So ! Cor 14:2 is NOT Acts 2 type of speaking in tongues...by a long shot. Not only for that reason, but for the others stated. I bet when you speak in tongues you do not experience 1) "a sound from heaven as of a rushing mighty wind" 2) the appearance unto you cloven tongues like as of fire, that sitteth upon you; and finally the very thing you really somehow missed 3) people all around you hearing you speak in tongues in a KNOWN LANGUAGE TO THEM (NOT TO YOU) "Now when this was noised abroad, the multitude came together, and were confounded, because that every man heard them speak in his own language (kinda puts a hole in your theory, doesn't it): 7 And they were all amazed and marvelled, saying one to another, Behold, are not all these which speak Galilaeans? 8 And how hear we every man in our own tongue, wherein we were born? 9 Parthians, and Medes, and Elamites, and the dwellers in Mesopotamia, and in Judaea, and Cappadocia, in Pontus, and Asia, 10 Phrygia, and Pamphylia, in Egypt, and in the parts of Libya about Cyrene, and strangers of Rome, Jews and proselytes, 11 Cretes and Arabians, we do hear them speak in our tongues the wonderful works of God." Other than "they were filled with the Holy Ghost and spoke in tongues" EVERYTHING IS DIFFERENT ABOUT THE EXPERIENCE between Acts 2 and 1 Cor 14:2...EVERYTHING. So YOU and no one to my knowledge has Acts 2 "tongues" save the possibility of those who have claimed to have spoken in tongues and it was heard by someone who said that the speaker spoke fluent Latin or French or German, etc. but the person speaking in tongues only knows English, etc. Usually this is in "missionary" situations and is merely a claim that cannot be verified but by faith I believe it can happen and am in no position to doubt it as it was ONE component of Acts 2. Because it would have a "purpose" the same as Acts 2 to share the gospel in a language meant for someone else (NOT the speaker)...which is why Acts 2 is DIFFERENT. 1) The mighty rushing wind...The scattering of the gospel around to go to the uttermost parts of the earth as part of the Great Commission; 2) The "cloven" tongues of fire...The Spirit of God, the Word coming as a "split" tongues (flames) relates to the splitting of the OT and the NT, the fulfillment of the promises of God to one people (the Jews totally finalized by the destruction of the Temple AD 67-70) and the New Covenant at the Day of Pentecost made to the true Jews circumcised of heart (the Israel of God, the Remnant, i.e.-the CHURCH); and then 3) per everything above should be self explanatory-this New Thing God was doing was to start in Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria, then to the rest of the world (Cornelius house)...where people spoke with different tongues. It was allegorical. Other than the fact that you have the gospel and are saved, you do NOT have the entire allegory when YOU speak in tongues (your 1 Cor 14:2 "prayer language" benefits YOU, no one else). That is how I see it. I may be wrong, but until I can be convinced otherwise, I think that is "scriptural" and more sound than saying when we speak in tongues, we have the whole Acts 2 experience because it is clear we do not.

[@ajones1816]

Praise Jesus Yeaboy, so glad you are here, it’s not by accident that you are here, Jesus brought you here. When God does something he does it when he has set everything into place. The pentecost was one of the three Jewish feasts Where are the Hebrews all had to gather in Jerusalem. The pouring out of his spirit on this day was on purpose it fulfilled Bible prophecy. So when God poured out his Spirit to the 120 in the upper room after they were filled with the Holy Ghost they then went out from the room and into the streets where God had gathered all the Hebrews from where they were Scattered abroad To witness this great Miracle that happened for the very first time. The Bible lists some of the different languages that the people spoke that where gathered for the feast of Pentecost. So here is my point, when someone is speaking in Tongues and there is nobody there that speaks or understands the language coming out, that doesn’t mean they Are speaking Jibberesh, all that means is nobody is there that understands the language that they are speaking in tongues. There are many languages in this world so many it’s hard to even count. But say you are in China, and the Holy Ghost starts the fall on the Chinese crowd, and all of a sudden they start speaking English. You know it’s English because you speak the language. That has happened many times. I hope that helps you. Also maybe this will help too. In John chapter 3 verse 8 Jesus says that everyone Who is born of spirit you will hear a sound, the Greek word for sound is phōnēn it means language! It’s where we get our word Phone and Phonics, it means language. So let’s go back and translate Jesus said everyone born of the spirit you will hear a language come from them!

[@yeahboyoboy]

@@ajones1816 Thank you so much for your reply and words of encouragement. I came to this channel to hear what was being said about the Trinity and found this about Acts 2. While I am in a bit of disagreement w/ some of this, it is a wonderful topic to discuss. There are, I believe, now over 7,000 different languages in the world, so to dismiss speaking any of those in prayer may be the case. Even the US has over 300, mostly native languages. I think in the Church, His People, the language of Spirit most often used is that of understanding and presenting in known tongues, but we ourselves have need of intercession by the Spirit. I get most excited about the doctrine of the Trinity. I consider myself an NT Trinitarian where the Tri-une aspect of God is the role / relationship He has with us...His People, the Church. I don't like the traditional view, even though I was raised Catholic, it is such a "forced" doctrine, where you have to make the OT contain the Trinity, whereas the idea of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit in a relational aspect is a NT concept and technically, when you consider the OT "foreshadowing" of such, it is really about our "Salvation," i.e. the Name of Jesus. Thanks, Brian... (connected4realatgmail) should you ever want to talk about these subjects. I think they are vital to the Christian experience. In Him.

[@ajones1816]

@@yeahboyoboy ok, sounds like you believe in the Oneness of God to me.

[@Brock2048]

So if I am understanding correctly, you are claiming Romans and every other book of the New Testament cannot be understood properly without filtering them through Acts 2:38. Is that correct? If so, my question is what about the people to whom the letters were initially written? Many of the letters were written before Acts, and it is very likely that many of the first century readers of the epistles never had a chance to read Acts. So your claim is next to none of the people to whom the letters were written properly understood them? Please reconcile this for me.

[@randyclark222]

*Urshan

[@colonialroofingofnorthcaro441]

Plus with the thief on the cross and I can be completely wrong here and I am always open to being wrong when it comes to the word of God but he said today you will be with me in paradox there's nothing saying he went to heaven and nothing I'm not saying he's not going to heaven I'm just saying Jesus told them I go to prepare a place and this is after the crucifixion and the resurrection and the 40 days or so that he was with them expounding them in knowledge and opening their heart and their mind to reveal all these Revelations so firstly from what I seen of reading that part of the word of God is that he did not say you'll be with me in heaven you'll see will be in Paradise now a lot of people want to say that's heaven okay maybe it is maybe it ain't I'm just telling you what I was thinking I can be wrong and anybody correct me if they got Bible on it then that's fine but if Jesus goes to prepare a place then Paradise I would say is exactly or it could be something like what he said that he done when everybody when he died he went to the center of the Earth and preached unto those which I would say that thief would be there that's where he's at in that place where Jesus went and preached to all those people to give the new truth and a new gospel the ones that did not get to see the promise who died before the cross but that's just me I could be completely wrong this is the whole reason we discussed this stuff and so we can all find out what is God's perfect will in our lives and in his word God bless everybody in Jesus name

[@samuelknipp6978]

A paradigm Is 20 cents

[@rontrrllturner6176]

I might be wrong but when you say the POPE dose not have say but he can change scripture in the Catholic Church he’s the one under GOD the Catholic Church is a totally a different kind of church do you have a Catholic bible I do in there are hail MARYS AND ALL THE CATHOLIC SCRIPTURES and more

[@joesanmiguel9682]

You must mention that believing and justification comes only through entering into the new testament covenant. IN the old testament you enter into covenant by being circumcised.