10 Deadliest Naval Vessels of USA that will be commission in 2025

[@GTOGregory]

It's good to see the Coast Guard getting a new ship!

[@sword_of_light]

She's lightly armed for such a large ship - at least large in terms of the US Coast Guard. The Famous-class still sports the rapid-fire 76mm, as does the Hamilton-class, which I think the Heritage-class is meant to replace. I know the USCG downgraded a lot of its weapons systems after the end of the Cold War, but it's interesting how much more lightly armed they all seem to be getting despite how involved they are in the South Pacific.

[@zeroinfinity9189]

@@sword_of_light Yeah but I wouldn't be to worried about it thought. The U.S. Coast Guard don't rarely ever participate in any global war besides search and rescue mission. The closest danger would probably be engaging in piracy or drug smuggling. Also arming them would be costly since they also have to account for personals who needs to be trained to operate and maintaining the weapons. As for the large size, this would be good for the Coast Guard to traverse across the Ocean for instance going to Hawaii or Alaska if need be.

[@sword_of_light]

@@zeroinfinity9189 - No. The US Coast Guard has been fighting global conflicts since the French Quasi-War of 1798. They were escorting convoys in WWII, as well as piloting landing craft. A Coast Guardsman named Douglas A. Munro was posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor for leading the rescue of three Marine companies during the Battle of Guadalcanal. In the Vietnam war, the US Coast Guard were the first US vessels to patrol the Mekong Delta, as the US Navy at the time had no shallow-draft vessels that could navigate the river. Currently, the Coast Guard has numerous vessels deployed in the South Pacific at the request of allied nations like the Philippines, to counter-act aggression by Chinese militia vessels pretending to be fishermen. If conflict with China occurs, the US Coast Guard will likely be the ones first on the scene.

[@gary3875]

As a Marine I have to say I’m damn proud of our Navy! Anchors Aweigh!🇺🇸

[@tcarroll3954]

And our Woke military will go away in 2025. More good patriots will be enlisting.

[@jds6206]

Hey Marine, the Navy is scrapping the Amphibs.......and I am NOT proud of how our Navy has shrunk over the past 50 years.....

[@keithnguyen9725]

@@jds6206be quiet man

[@keithnguyen9725]

Thank u for your service🫡

[@ManOfChaiTea]

25 knots on the Iowa? I love how our military down plays our capabilities =)

[@pike100]

I also thought that speed was too low.

[@eliot5100]

Standard spiel >20 Knots >400 Ft depth. The issue has never been the accuracy of the information but the confirmation of the specs.

[@victorglaviano]

@@ManOfChaiTea Kitty Hawk did 32 kn, I was on it!

[@victorglaviano]

@eliot5100 no way, no US Navy warship of the line commissioned since WWII could only make 20 kn! Unless a minesweeper or amphib, not a ship of the line, at least 30 kn, usually 34+. The USS Kitty Hawk CV63 did 32 during OPPE full boiler flex and flank speed trials, I was on it in 1998.

[@eliot5100]

@@victorglaviano You obviously didn't read my answer. YOU NEVER GIVE ANY INFORMATION THAT CAN BE USED TO CONFIRM A SHIPS CAPABILITIES. Its called OPSEC - Operational Security. You never show a potential enemy your true capabilities.

[@americantico9896]

God Bless the US Navy 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

[@FerretJohn]

While I always like a good warship, the ship I would really like to see built are a couple of new Hospital ships. Sure, they're not that dramatic, but we only have two and they're aging repurposed oilers, we could use a couple new ones built for the purpose.

[@dereklucero5785]

It’s hard to gauge how big those subs are until you see them dry-docked next to a person for scale….WOW.

[@Akren905]

........ yeah bud they aren't 2 foot wide lol 😂

[@scoutmaster33]

It’s about goal post to goal post on a football field and a little narrower than said same football field……Not nearly as roomy as one might expect even at that size.

[@highground2320]

The Littoral Combat ships are being decommissioned almost as fast as the enter services. The navy considers them floating coffins.

[@Fred_Lougee]

LCS = Little Crappy Ship

[@yeomantrader9505]

Everytime I see one of these commissioned I think "Aren't we through with these yet?"

[@solomongray6352]

Give them to the coast guard. Close to shore if they break down (they do), but fast enough to challenge drug runners and hey almost as well armed.

[@MattyJ55046]

They decommissioned the first group of Littoral combat ships because they were defective. Issues with the power plant with one class and hull on the other, being two of the larger issues. From what I’ve heard they fixed the issues and that’s why they’re moving forward. However, if I’m wrong it wouldn’t surprise me that they still move forward…. If they work, they’ll come in handy in east Asia.

[@watchinglistening]

​​@@MattyJ55046YOUR RIGHT! 50 MILES AN HOUR! THEY'RE PUTTING 8 NSM's ON THEM! ( NAVAL STRIKE MISSILES) THEY CAN OPERATE ON SHALLOW WATERS AND ON RADAR BLEND IN WITH THE HUNDREDS OF SMALL ISLANDS IN THE FIRST AND SECOND ISLAND CHAINS ISLAND! 🏝️ ⛓️ THEY EACH HAVE A ANTI SUBMARINE HELICOPTER. SO THE LCS ARE NOT THE LAME DUCKS MOST OF YOU ADMIRALS MAKE THEM OUT TO BE!

[@betty9340]

Love those side launches!

[@timothydubois5834]

Did it almost take out a tugboat?

[@StormSpotterJayhawk-z7u]

It’s so nice to hear your voice again, Kim. I hope everything is going well for you.

[@JSwan-bd1tc]

The Freedom and Independence class ships have been a complete failure. The navy has decommissioned ships from these classes in as little as five years since their commission. The fact we are still building these ships in spite of their shortcomings is an example of our government ineptness.

[@gatorking4953]

I mean i think they look cool thats about it

[@peppertrout]

Elon and DOGE will be on it.

[@senianns9522]

Also the Littoral class ships.

[@CraigWatson-wr9gy]

Is is the kind of stuff Elon ca get rid of with DOGE

[@gregharbican7189]

The original idea behind them is sound, but for all practical purposes, the early ships of both classes ended up as test beds as they figured out what does work and what doesn’t work. That said, both classes ended up as victims of feature bloat, as the Navy tried to make them into mini Arleigh Burkes, with the capacity a little bit of everything.

[@madmaximus2836]

My son will be graduating from the USNA and wants to serve on a fast attack sub.

[@paulmicheldenverco1]

If I were younger and had the chops I'd want to fly a fighter jet and being on a carrier seemed harder than an air strip, but thinking it through it seems being a Naval Aviator is something of a deathwish.

[@madmaximus2836]

@@paulmicheldenverco1 I was in my teens when Top Gun hit the theaters and even though I lived in another country at the time, it was absolutely awe inspiring. Thirty seven years later as we left the cinema after watching Top Gun Maverick my USNA son said: Dad, you know I could apply for flight school to become a Navy pilot. He decided to pursue the submarine fleet instead. I think we watched The Hunt for Red October and Crimson Tide too often ;-)

[@almoemason]

That means he will have to become a nuclear engineer. After serving on subs for over twenty years (sonar tech) most nuclear officers given a choice to go back in time and be a nuclear engineer or an inmate at a maximum security prison, ninety-nine percent would choose prison.

[@madmaximus2836]

@@almoemason He already did 12 months of the enlisted nuclear propulsion training in SC prior to enrolling at the USNA. He was first in his Power School class, which helped to get him into the USNA. He'll have to redo Power School and take the officer's version and then Prototype. He also mentioned that the attrition rate is high for Nukes.

[@billmorrison3993]

@@paulmicheldenverco1 As is driving a car . . . few Naval Aviators have ever been involved in an accident.

[@flywheel986]

FYI, Raleigh Burke class destroyers can cruise at 30kts. Top speed at full emergency is better than 40kts

[@Badgerstate]

Shhhh....

[@jenniferbeyer6412]

Does anyone know when USS ENTERPRISE CVN 80 will be in service? Can't wait to see if she can match CVN 65.

[@clifford4514]

Need to build more Destroyers. And Cruisers. Only have 4 Cruisers. And most of the Destroyers are old

[@victorglaviano]

@clifford4514 probably won't be anymore cruisers, DDGs like Arleigh Burke class have AEGIS, TLAMs and there's no other capital ships in other navies except for Russia with outdated heavy cruisers full of guns! Outdated, expensive and probably could pay for 1.5 Arleigh Burke's for the price of a new Tico class CG. Also the Navy ordered a bunch of new Constellation class FFGs (Italian Fincantieri class frigates).

[@jds6206]

All wrong Cliff......just check the US Navy in Wikipedia.....expand your grape....

[@dannywainwrightq7828]

50 year service life for nuclear carriers . 20-25 years for first mid life refit .

[@ryarbrough1195]

Midway was in service for 50 years.

[@captainamerica3814]

Actually, I heard the new carriers can go their whole life (50 years) without having to do a mid life refuel.

[@johngrimm1103]

@@captainamerica3814 They can, in theory. But with all the pressure on the Navy to be everywhere these days, these new ships are going to be used hard and this will lead to their fuel-pile getting depleted faster, so when they go to get new radars and catapults and lifts in 20-25 years they may as well include refueling the reactors.

[@user-zz6vp1oo3s]

The USA needs to build more ships.

[@johntucker6326]

DDGs 124 and 126 are Bathe built. They are behind the curve Jack Lucas DDG 125 was commission before and delivered to navy before anyone those 2 were

[@ArdyShufle]

To each their own, I like the narrator 😊...

[@donwilson1307]

Yeah, adding 6 new ships and retiring 13? Going in the wrong direction.

[@conard5381]

Depends. If the retired ships are so out dated that they are not of much use costs are high to maintain budget wise it may be the prudent thing to do

[@brittneykonan]

They can retire them and use their frame for building other vessels

[@danlambert1061]

Meanwhile, China has launched 6 frigates in the last 18 months as well as a carrier. And more are the way. We are being out built by vessels that are state of the art. I worry for our Navy.

[@Tontu-ty]

@@danlambert1061 Capability matters more than numbers as technology advances.

[@MattyJ55046]

Need money to build new ones. That is 7 ships no longer tugging on the budget.

[@erikmoller84]

Good to remember that actual dive depths and speeds are classified information for submarines

[@Initialcosts]

Such creative videos you’ve on this channel. Just subscribed!

[@megahamartolos6638]

This video neglected to state that the USCGC Argus was built by Eastern Shipyard, Panama City, Florida.

[@vigoedwinpandika5236]

5:51 imagine it says USS Barrack Obama From Black Ops 2 💀

[@pauloakwood9208]

Why are we still wasting money on Littoral ships? We would be better served by frigates or corvettes.

[@snowfan0521]

Those are the remaining ships under the previous contract as no more will be built and atleast the ship builder of the freedom class has already switched over to building the new constellation class frigates

[@Dreadwolf3155]

'maybe' with ......yeah no they're junk! i am also wondering whats the deal with those new frigates we are waiting for. ALso like to see an old nimitz fitted with project replicator

[@EsotericResearcher777]

Well they have yet to approve the frigate design that Congress demanded be purchased off the shelf for the purpose of speed of construction. They essentially are redesigning it from scratch, ignoring their Congressional mandate. And even then, when I was working I could have produced the 3D drawings myself, alone, in less than 6 years. The hold up is in the drawing approvals. They are still decommissioning more ships than they are producing and they are going to go down to like 1.2 Virginia's a year now. China is rapidly outpacing us and I don't ever see Australia getting their subs at this rate. Congress has poured countless billions down a hole trying to get them competitive with the Chinese construction rates, but nothing improves. The whole system needs an overhaul.

[@julianpereira8474]

The subs are way deadlier than the surface vessels.

[@Dreadwolf3155]

i'm a fan of the AMerica class though. THink we need to focus more on frigates, CVL's and drone carriers/ordanance ships

[@julianpereira8474]

@@Dreadwolf3155 The USN ships are all massively cool. But a single Ohio SSBN is a nuclear superpower by itself.

[@paulprovenzano3755]

Twenty-five knots?? That’s with the pedal halfway down😂😂

[@revolvermaster4939]

Yeah, I was on a destroyer built in 1961 that did 33 knots while I was on it!

[@MikeSkinner-d7l]

Go America!! We need yoU!

[@jeremythebeer8609]

As a Canadian, why can the USA not build our new Type 26 'River Class' frigates? USA seems to have the capacity to crank out ships while our 2-3 facilities will need decades to rebuild our fleet. Are the order slots booked? I understand that we do not need attack submarines nor have the number of men/women required serve on a destroyer. Just curious.

[@PantheraOnca60]

The U.S. is experiencing a shortage of qualified shipwrights, which has made for construction delays on our own ships.

[@jeremythebeer8609]

@@PantheraOnca60 Sad times. Without new ships, the RCN cannot grow/replace the current fleet.

[@b21raider27]

Wow, so many epic ships. Ford class super carrier to 3 Virginia class attack submarines in just 2025.

[@brobasticbroham446]

Me as President "MOAR SHIPS!"

[@markrbrown8463]

Both classes of the LCS have been evaluated as incapable of carrying out the missions it was designed and the fact that both suffer significant structural or mechanical deficiencies. The crew is too small for the ship to have sustained deployments, is a fuel hog and it was determined to be un-survivable in any conflict with top-tier navies.

[@tgsgardenmaintenance4627]

Removing the well deck for the America class was nonsensical ! At least they've rectified their expensive mistake!

[@chrissnape9537]

The surface vessels require guns that point low enough for sea drones

[@Dreadwolf3155]

helios !

[@jailbird1133]

Missiles are better at intercepting drones

[@Dreadwolf3155]

@@jailbird1133 but intercepting a 10k drone with a 1m missile is a losing proposition. now if Anruill can come up with cheap misisle swarms..

[@Stakan79]

@@jailbird1133at what cost?

[@ImperiumLibertas]

Sea skimming anti ship cruise missiles have existed for a very long time. Drones are just s cheaper less capable version. I believe what the OP means is autonomous boats like those used by Ukraine loaded with explosives and driven remotely.

[@RobertP-zk8vh]

the flight 3 burkes hold 132 missiles only 10 less then a tico

[@kents8451]

What country is this channel being produced from?

[@duhaneyparkclassics7484]

take a wild guess...

[@arthouston7361]

Chiii...na!

[@kents8451]

@@arthouston7361 Receipts? Enquiring minds want to know. On another note.. your replies KZbin translation to English is interesting.

[@DOI_ARTS]

The accent of the girl is definitely not American

[@cutemomr]

Chinese narstive. Obsessed with America.

[@MrFirstdance2000]

I sure hope we have a lot of subs.,..I feel very concerned for all the above water vessels vs. Russian and Chinese missles!

[@AJJohnson164]

I had the opportunity to take a ride on the original JFK when it was at NAS Mayport. My grandfather knew the CO at the time.

[@rickbase833]

The Virginia and Burke class platforms are prime examples of successful design and execution. That's why both have so many ships/boats ordered. As for the LCS ships.......exact opposite. Under armed and defective......and waste of tax dollars.

[@bradclark2922]

We should be building 50 new ships per year and 100 new aircraft per year. The Air Force pilot shortage is getting bad.

[@carryfreak5059]

I am proud to live United States of America as these ships are coming online.

[@-_.._._--_.-.-_-_-_-...-.-]

Bring back the Cruisers!

[@user-zz6vp1oo3s]

Our country needs twenty Aircraft carriers.

[@JimChannel152]

Ummm... three Virginias aren't being commissioned per year. 2 at most. You should pair this video with one of how many ships the USN is decommissioning, but that would be a lot longer of a video. USN warship production and maintenance infrastructure is really, really bad.

[@Agent77X]

2025 Iowa submarine is back to diesel power like WW 2 submarines!😮

[@stevekohl5351]

No, the diesel engine is only a backup to the nuclear reactor. Of course the engine burns corn and soybeans. It is the Iowa.

[@mikesavage6420]

All nuclear subs have emergency diesel engines

[@jds6206]

This is a joke.....between the US Navy and US Coast Guard, they should be commissioning 30 new vessels in 2025. With each passing year, our Navy gets smaller and smaller..... Yea, I remember when the big discussion was when our Navy went below 600 ships. Oh, and NOT all "10" of those "Naval Vessels" are combatants.

[@MonkeyFeat]

Get the new Frigates on-line to support the DDGs. I was on FFGs and love those tin cans.

[@mikefowler301]

I'm a Navy vet, Yes I am laughing at this.

[@johnhause7150]

100,000 tons in EXCESS of 40 knots. 🤯

[@watchinglistening]

I READ THAT THE HULLS AT THE WATER LINE ARE 8 INCHES THICK! THAT'S A HEAVY DUTY HORNETS NEST!

[@johnhause7150]

@watchinglistening i still cant wrap my head around this number. 200 MILLION lbs. at greater than 40 knots . Thats the "unclassified" speed. Thats 46 mph. I bet its at least 55 mph top speed. Thats kookoo crazy fast. Heavy duty is the understatement of the century. The U.S has 3 of these in service and 1 or more in various stages of construction , plus , 8 more carriers of up to 90,000 tons in service . 😱. No wonder the world fears US.

[@Robdog1-w1f]

@@johnhause7150 The Ford Class is overpowered. However, for all the crap the USN pulls, and all the wasteful spending of tax dollars, I do have to give them that, they've never liked slow ships, and being overpowered gets you out of harms way faster than being underpowered.

[@johnhause7150]

@Robdog1-w1f 🤔. Cowardly Lion? The killer Cat that strikes out of fear? Is that your stance? Id say they are more like a Tactical Tiger that carefully chooses its time and place to pounce and makes the kill all by itself. Survival is the name of the game. Lions will eat their own , but a Tiger, now there is REAL POWER. What might a Trump class ship be like?. 150,000 tons of Whoop Ass. The Killer Whale...🤣 ( we already know he wont run from a fight).

[@YourTripleScorpio]

Counties with Interstates should have open seasons for deer so that aculling effect could be studied as these hiways are better monitored for accidents?

[@GThomas-q1e]

Noticed a lot of literal ships being built. Might be a harbinger of things to come.

[@Josh-iv2bw]

Littoral. Lol

[@CPO-Snarky]

@@Josh-iv2bw At least he didn't say Clittoral. LOL

[@marcppparis]

The Aircraft carrier has a life of 50 years. 20-25 years is when it would go through refueling and overhaul

[@fernandomirandilla9088]

I hope the USS Enterprise (Gerald R. Ford Class Super Carrier) will return soon.

[@thor-cj9dh]

It's the next one, Ibelieve, but if not, it's in the pipeline.

[@PantheraOnca60]

​@@thor-cj9dh The Enterprise (CVN-80) is indeed next in line; she's already under construction.

[@patmyles4776]

I look forward to the day when we don't study war no more.

[@scottsevers6194]

Australia 🇦🇺 is still waiting for our AUKUS submarines. We aren't holding our breath 😅

[@l.coleman279]

Those are not due until the mid 2030s. Jumping the gun there a bit.

[@kkquikB1]

And they will have to maintain them. Has Australia sold all of their ports to chin a yet? If the NZ navy is any indication, it won’t be of much use anyways.

[@michaellinner7772]

Might we expect further installments, also with an obvious AI ?

[@poohbear1647]

USA needs to replace All of the Ticonderoga class cruisers. They are really old.

[@timmartin7664]

My question is, when will AI technology be used in these ship? Like the M5 in the original Star Trek series..

[@Tttaucan]

If I'm not wrong the JF Kennedy should have been commissioned in 2022 but 2025 it was push to.

[@verndaley3471]

Hate it when the commentators cannot pronounce names of weapons etc. “littoral”

[@robertwarren4734]

Their Latin is atrocious as well e.g. Patria is Pah-tree-ah @2:45.

[@jonmanson]

USS Pierre is actually pronounced “Peer” not the French pronunciation of “Pea Air” - just an fyi.

[@garykelly2230]

Why don't we tell everybody what we have

[@Dreadwolf3155]

fair point, though i don't think ships are exactly easy to hide.

[@hlaroux]

Ship building in general is pretty difficult to hide physically and fiscally but the reason why the specs are vague is that we don't show all the cards publicly.

[@Balnk1326]

800ft depth?

[@PauKolloch]

Probably more like a thousand

[@fshoutowtr]

More likely classified.

[@redman3741]

Test depth. Not max depth.

[@s1nb4d59]

Narrator needs to move the mic further away .

[@Hemidakota]

Excellent podcast. Any air or ground assets to report

[@tanpengjoo7205]

THOU AMERICA IS NOT PERFECT IT PLAYED AN IMPORTANT ROLE IN MAINTAINING THE ORDER OF PEACE AND HUMANITY. FULLY SUPPORT USA, IF NOT THE USA TODAY THE WORLD WOLL BE MUCH MESSIER.

[@jtf2dan]

Putin watches this video ...then cries himself to sleep.

[@williamhoward8319]

the gearing that i steamed in the fifties we could 40 knts on 4 boilers

[@anglosaxon244]

Russia and China got them all on their list!!

[@nikolayinavon6085]

CommissionED

[@mwh3227]

Submarines seem to be the way too go! It has to be hard with modern technology to protect surface vessels from missile attack? Carriers are expense, and I would bet hard to protect? I don't see much of a future in them!

[@johnrambo7891]

An LCS on thus list? Uh the LCS class is to expensive and a experiment

[@scottcooper4391]

TWO of them !! I'm not convinced that the LCS ships are worth having. I reserve the right to be wrong about this....

[@jimmccormick6091]

expensive yes, experiment, unfortunately, no

[@BobbyRFleenorJr-xw7th]

The ships have steel old antique designs including the subs where are the new designs in the new technology we're falling behind

[@BuffaloBob-og]

All wonderful additions for the Navy. 1 class of ship I would begin building ASAP are big boy ice breakers. Things have been looking sketchy in the Antarctic for quite some time now. By building these Ice breakers now, we could have parity with the Russians are they cannot build more of these ships due to the war in Ukraine. Time to outsource some of the Naval needs to allies to keep up with new ships builds as well as being in front of the curve with decommissioning of old unreliable inventory. There are plenty of countries who would love to build new ships for us at a better cost.

[@ronaldbobeck9636]

And who is going to man these ships ? The services are having to lower the standards for the new recruits. During the Vietnam War they lowered the Mental Score to an IQ score of 85 .

[@Palanibert]

The narrator needs to improve her English pronunciation. She is hard to understand sometimes.

[@wramsey2656]

May God be with you and help protect our nation and allies.

[@davef.6803]

Stupid comparison. Like putting a Roman legion up against WWII Panzer. Any hit from any weapon on board the Yamato bigger than the smallest flak would obliterate an A-10 or any other aircraft ever built. But hitting them would be a problem with high speed jets.

[@scoutmaster33]

Ford class lifespan of 25 years? More like double that. LCS stands for Little Crappy Ships…..

[@Darren-i2q]

Freedom class. Freedom of stupidity

[@twostrikenumpkahapa8857]

Pierre, SD is pronounced 'pier', and, the Little Crappy Ships should all be scrapped.

[@stovetopicus]

I can't wait to see the USS Donald J. Trump.

[@flyer14bravo29]

It won't happen. I'm pretty sure you have to have served in order to have your name on a ship.

[@stovetopicus]

@@flyer14bravo29 You absolutely do not.

[@kcgibbs]

It will be the biggest, fastest, most powerful ever. It will scare Chiiinah.

[@ericsorensen8705]

You can’t name a navy vessel after a convicted felon and a draft dodger period. Navy Viet Nam vet here.

[@kcgibbs]

@@ericsorensen8705not a convicted felon.

[@Jeff-ej4wp]

Which ones will take down china?

[@FreedomPrevail501]

The narrator has an interesting accent??

[@watchinglistening]

THEY'RE PUTTING 8 NSM'S ON THEM ( NAVAL STRIKE MISSILES)! THE LCS CAN HIDE IN THE HUNDREDS OF SMALL ISLANDS IN THE FIRST AND SECOND ISLAND CHAINS 🏝️⛓️ AND GET LOST ON RADAR CLUTTER CLOSE TO THE ISLANDS! AND THEN PUT A NAVAL STRIKE MISSILE IN YOUR SIDE WHEN YOU PASS THRU A STRAIT! YOU SELF APPOINTED ADMIRALS MAKE ME CHUCKLE SOMETIMES!😊!

[@CutefaceKennyJ]

Thank you! I love all the wannabes on here, trolling centuries of combat experience from their mom's basement couch.

[@roseanneroseannadanna9651]

A Chinese AI telling and showing what we have coming up! Crazy ain't it?!

[@tanpengjoo7205]

MADE IN USA ALWAYS POWERFUL

[@maynardconde.2954]

F35 has tons of deffects!!! And there are nuke subs and Aircraft-carriers out of operation due to fails in solderings.

[@soupbums]

Thats alot of seamen there 😂

[@cerebralparasite9238]

The USA is in debt 36Trillion dollars.

[@Fetherko]

Could you not find a narrator with better diction?

[@wopmedic69]

What good are all these military vessels if they allow Russian and Chinese ships to enter us waters

[@roberthenry9319]

Good for "The Buzz" for not using a computer voice. At least. I don't think this is a computer voice. But wouldn't it be better for "The Buzz" to use a narrator who sounds like they are, you know, from America?

[@daleyuile]

Yes, she is a real person narrating. As the Buzz does of "list of" posts, covering assets of a lot of countries, I think it's unreasonable to expect the narrator to be American.

[@PiratePrincessYuki]

Anyone else besides me think we need to get back to building a few new battleships with nuclear reactors and rail guns?

[@jailbird1133]

They are useless in modern warfare

[@paulmicheldenverco1]

The battleship was made obsolete by the aircraft carrier, though they were used for shore bombardment and they launched cruise missiles in the first Gulf War and possibly the second. The rail guns seem to have potential.

[@kriszeeck6011]

Um yah remove the LCS they are absolute trash. and also remove anything in the coast guard. you have to actually have armaments to be deadly....

[@JoshuaHistoryBuff]

You should actually watch the video before posting a comment junior. The CG cutter is armed with a 57mm gun, a 25mm gun and 50 cals.

[@jamesjacobson3966]

Considering their limited armament & range the LCS are indeed a dubious addition to a blue water navy. Don’t really see the Chinese being intimidated by a fleet of these off their shores. If they’re intended for inshore role supporting the marines or the navy seals then why don’t they have at least a 5” gun for shore bombardment. I also note at 3400 tons or so why are they being given names of US cities that in the past were usually reserved for ships in the cruiser class. The SSNs are now being given names of states traditionally reserved for battleships but their role & firepower probably makes them deserving however IMHO. Now returning to the LCS vessels going into reserve in some cases immediately after commissioning, why not give those to the Coast Guard? At 44 knots speed and at least by the standards of coast guard cutters heavy armament they’d be ideal for anti smuggling ops and search & rescue ?😊

[@johnsilver9338]

Freedom class LCS YES. But Independence class LCS can still be repurposed. It can be a drone carrier due to it large flight deck. And its fast too.

[@Nyth63]

Your ignorance is almost comical.

[@molotovEOD]

@@Nyth63almost.

[@rainmaker6335]

Im guessing this narrator is NOT from South Dakota. ( Pierre ..Like the guy from France ). lol 🤣

[@Integr8d]

‘vessels that will be commission in…’ 🤦‍♂️

[@rcrogers6]

Why not use someone who speaks clear English as their native tongue? Too many words are mispronounced.

[@thebuzz4108]

You can use the subtitle

[@rcrogers6]

@@thebuzz4108 I understood her every word, I just thought it was inappropriate. For all I know she is a former Deck Officer in the USN. Our nation and Navy are strong because of our diverse population. But not everyone can be a TV/Radio announcer.

[@irememberhistory]

Her English is more understandable than half of my born in the USA neighbors.

[@Brian2ndAmendment]

Frigates are the future

[@Dreadwolf3155]

frigates and drone swarms. could a drone with say a W plate be used as a close in missile interceptor?

[@davidd.c.9344]

Couldn't get anyone better to narrate this video that can actually pronounce the words properly??

[@dereklucero5785]

Let Elon’s engineers design the next LCS’s please. The DOD has already wasted over $20b (with a bee) in the first round of mothballed failures 🤬

[@TacTechMic]

America should be building subs, AI sub hunters, aircraft carriers, and AI ships that guard aircraft carriers at sea, and from under the sea automatically The problem is that we have old people, often with no experience at war or on these ships, making the decisions. This needs to stop soon. The best tacticians are often gamers. Use their knowledge and give them recognition. Young people should be deep within the decision making chain, though maybe not making the final ok; as they operate from wanting to win, where old people often just want to defend well. We need to look at the people throughout America for the answers that drive America forward. Identify the bad eggs and scramble them, before they become a problem. Go AI, go hive mind, go drones with only people guiding the overall, and let computers build jets that can do 50x gravity, because computers don’t care. Stop building to the limitations of men (and women), but rather computer programs and AI. peace through strength