10 Largest and Longest Aircraft Carriers Of WWII

Рет қаралды 87,331

The Buzz

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 89

@randywarren7101 10 ай бұрын

Since the carrier Midway was commissioned 8 days after the end of WW2 you really can't have this carrier on the list!

@dajuanvariste4751 8 ай бұрын

you can, she was a world war 2 design no matter how you put it.

@HappyGM-R 8 ай бұрын

@@dajuanvariste4751 That is a very dumb statement. If so you have to include all the ships that was designed in ww2 but never commissioned nor completed, such as the Japanese Hakuryu or the Soviet carriers, Germans super carriers and perhaps Italian ones as well. Either way this list is wrong.

@dajuanvariste4751 8 ай бұрын

@@HappyGM-R it’s not a dumb statement if the war had went on for at least another year or two she definitely would have participated let’s not act like she wasn’t complete already before the war ended

@balli7836 10 ай бұрын

Nice, but i have two points to consider: 1. Sparviento and Midway shouldn't be on the list, because in your video you are saying "aircraft carriers that served in WW2". Both of them didn't serve in WW2 because the italian ship was never commissioned and Midway was commissioned after the war. 2. Having Yorktown CV-10 of the Essex-class on the list is confusing. You should either choose U.S.S. Essex herself to represent the class or you should choose Ticonderoga or another long-hull Essex, because they were slightly larger. Also, the original Yorktown (or Yorktown-class) CV-5 is missing because they were also larger than some other ships in the list.

@ShawnBeckmann-f4h Ай бұрын

Agreed! Very inaccurate

@SlickCycler 10 ай бұрын

CV-14, USS Ticonderoga and all the later Essex class carriers were longer than CV-10 Yorktown. They were called the long-hull Essex class carriers.

@Daniel-l3x7f 10 ай бұрын

You left out the IJN Aircraft Carrier Taiho. This vessel was 855 ft. long and displaced around 30,000 tons.

@johnmorales7057 10 ай бұрын

Very good call not mention the Graf Zeppelin was a hair over 861 feet. Odd list tbh but hey somewhat entertaining .

@treystephens6166 10 ай бұрын

Water Displacement???

@聖帝サウザー-s7n 8 ай бұрын

船の大きさは排水量なので、最大は信濃でしょう

@kna6442 9 ай бұрын

翔鶴型、赤城、信濃、の搭載機数が出鱈目なんですが。

@VioletSilence 10 ай бұрын

Yorktown didn't survive WWII and wasn't present in later conflicts - she was sunk by a Japanese submarine at the battle of Midway. You've most likely mistook Yorktown for some other carrier of this class. [Edit] Yeah, I see now. CV-5 and CV-10, both Yorktowns.

@hoytrichardson3448 10 ай бұрын

Your thinking of USS Yorktown CV-5. USS Yorktown CV-10 was laid down as USS Bonhomme Richard and had her name changed during construction to USS Yorktown shortly after the sinking of the CV-5.

@VioletSilence 10 ай бұрын

@@hoytrichardson3448 Ah. My bad, didn't knew there was a second Yorktown

@zosimoromero3475 10 ай бұрын

On present days aircraft carriers are becoming obselete... Its just a sitting dock... For hypersonic anti ship missile... ✌️✌️✌️

@paulchapin6877 10 ай бұрын

I think they’ve combined the two Yorktowns (cv-5 and cv-10). The construction date they give is for the first one but it’s the second that survived the war.

@dircon75 10 ай бұрын

@@zosimoromero3475 What ever you say Nikolai!

@hrochanek 10 ай бұрын

Ark Royal, Taiho and Essex?

@detroitpolak9904 7 ай бұрын

You can’t count Midway. Plus I think you used her angled deck dimensions, not straight deck. And CV-3 Saratoga was slightly larger and heavier than CV-2 Lexington after the extension of her fight deck to 901 feet during the war.

@silincer5186 10 ай бұрын

How was this list made? If we are going by length then Soryu, Hiryu and Unyru Medium Class carrier are longer than the Illustrious class. Also, Taiho is longer than the Shokaku class. Midway never served during WW2.

@Custerd1 10 ай бұрын

So many errors on this list.

@GazzaLDN 9 ай бұрын

Length isn't everything! Girth and how you use it is just as important

@squirepraggerstope3591 5 ай бұрын

HMS Illustrious' HANGAR CAPACITY, when completed was 36 aircraft. By 1945 when serving with the British Pacific fleet she operated airwings of 54 aircraft including two flying boats.

@steffenjonda8283 10 ай бұрын

You missed out Graf Zeppelin (length 260m), Tahio (265m) and Midway was commissioned post ww2, so is out.

@Koryo12149 9 ай бұрын

大鳳なのでTaihoですね

@GazzaLDN 9 ай бұрын

To qualify as an aircraft carrier, not only does it have to be completed, it also has to have some aircraft to fly from it.

@steffenjonda8283 9 ай бұрын

@@GazzaLDN Well, if one bring in the Aquilia one need to bring in the Zeppelin.

@davidhanson8728 10 ай бұрын

They seem to have confused the Yorktown class (lead by CV-5 Yorktown and not mention in this list at 770 feet) with the Essex class (which had the Yorktown II (CV-10) as part of the class. The Ark Royal was also around 800 feet long.

@MGB-learning 8 ай бұрын

Always an excellent video and presentation.

@ejd53 9 ай бұрын

Where is the Yorktown class? They were 824 feet long. According to your criteria, they should be number 6.

@大谷博行-s6x 2 ай бұрын

7:15 信濃は大きなバルバスバウがあるはずですが？

@Lady_Trouble 10 ай бұрын

Thank you for another's amazing video have a bless day ❤❤

@caifrank7425 9 ай бұрын

I really love to play the Battlestations Pacific and World of Warships

@taiyoarata6763 9 ай бұрын

-KAKU MEANS " CRAINE, (BIRD) " IN JAPANESE

@jimmysweat2200 10 ай бұрын

The largest carrier was shanano sister ship of Yamato converted to a aircraft carrier

@jackdaniel7465 10 ай бұрын

No, the Lexington and Saratoga were slightly longer.

@rotton-c8o 9 ай бұрын

Shinano has the largest amount of drainage.

@jackdaniel7465 9 ай бұрын

@@rotton-c8o 😂😂😂

@rin-jn8be 9 ай бұрын

@@jackdaniel7465お前は馬鹿だ😂😂😂😂😂😂

@野比ドラえもん-w9p Ай бұрын

@@jackdaniel7465 ？

@Raketenmaulwurf 10 ай бұрын

If you put Sparviero and Shinano on the list, which are both not completed then you gotta bring Graf Zeppelin to the list aswell. With 262,5m in length she would even take number 4 spot on the list. But let's not be so picky. Still a nice comparison though

@jiyuhong5853 10 ай бұрын

Shinano was actually used, although not successfully, graff Zepplin was never complete

@Guangrui 10 ай бұрын

Battleships still call the shots in the European theatre

@Crab_Allah 9 ай бұрын

USS shinano??? *Ijn shinano*

@slacktrack7118 9 ай бұрын

This must be the Playskool or Fisher-Price version of a good carrier list.

@kayjay7780 9 ай бұрын

Have a competant naval historian fact check before publishing this stuff

@bobharrison7693 10 ай бұрын

You show pics of CV-10 when talking about CV-5.

@johannessoleng1683 10 ай бұрын

yorktown got sunk i think

@treystephens6166 10 ай бұрын

Yeah in 1942

@johannessoleng1683 10 ай бұрын

that was what i thought i am into ww2 and i was like no it was def sunk@@treystephens6166

@billwhelpley6825 10 ай бұрын

Maybe give a few more seconds to the soundtrack selection?

@TheMisterBlackJack 9 ай бұрын

En el segmento dedicado al Yorktown, mezclas imágenes de CV-5, Clase Yorktown con el CV.10, Clase Essex

@wojtek5596 10 ай бұрын

Winner can be only 1 and it is ofc Essex class (I don't count Midway).

@RomuloCavalcanti-bt8yv 10 ай бұрын

Taiho???

@qaf7477 10 ай бұрын

Please put Persian subtitles in the videos

@thewiseoldherper7047 10 ай бұрын

#4 Yorktown. 1 of 24 Essex class carriers. 24!!!

@mariocarinelli5565 10 ай бұрын

Da italiano appassionato di storia navale, piu che la R. N. Sparviero (solo abbozzata) avrei considerato la R. N. Aquila (praticamente completa e pronta per le prove in mare), ma sarebbe comunque un azzardo: i ns piloti non avevano alcuna esperienza di appontaggio e quindi sarebbe stato necessario farli tornare sul territorio nazionale per atterrare una volta decollati

@caifrank7425 9 ай бұрын

WW2 CV number : US : 157 , UK : 96 , Japan : 25 , Germany : 1 , France : 1, Italy : 1 Why the US navy have such a large number of the CV WW2 , I don't understand about it

@tigerland4328 4 ай бұрын

Because the US had to fight on the other side of the planet rather than in its immediate waters. Same with the UK

@野比ドラえもん-w9p Ай бұрын

日本は29だった

@LordRagnarson 10 ай бұрын

Thanks but cut the stupid music!

@chaoranye4621 9 ай бұрын

Lots of mistakes, unprofessional.

@alexanderleach3365 10 ай бұрын

Midway is a great place to visit

@straitjacket8689 Ай бұрын

Why was it the enterprise mentioned?

@gasparguadalupethecante6377 10 ай бұрын

excellent video the buzz

@kii1053 3 күн бұрын

信濃の艦型がおかしいですね。バルバスバウの球形艦首になっていない。

@snakeplissken2018 10 ай бұрын

No Enterprise 2 thumbs down

@tigerland4328 4 ай бұрын

*illustrious

@MrRoninGT 10 ай бұрын

In the 21st century there are floating coffins.

@omegacrow4597 10 ай бұрын

Ok mr ronin 😂😂

@VioletSilence 10 ай бұрын

In a global conflict, yes - it's the easiest way to lose 5000 men and a multibillion dollar military asset to a single hypersonic missile. In local conflicts, however, aircraft carriers are essential.

@MrRoninGT 10 ай бұрын

@@omegacrow4597 Refute it.

@MrRoninGT 10 ай бұрын

@@VioletSilence Yes. Aircraft carriers are very good against poor people in slippers and with spears who have oil.

@VioletSilence 10 ай бұрын

@@MrRoninGT Exactly