I'm a retired engineer and I can tell you that ethics is a foreign concept for many managers.
@lvtiguy2267 ай бұрын
As someone who has worked in QA and regulatory compliance for most of my career, I agree with you 💯!
@donaldhadley2497 ай бұрын
Very apparent
@emberfist83477 ай бұрын
Ethics is not in the vocabulary of corporate people.
@RobertR-ti8gg7 ай бұрын
😊
@mr16ga7 ай бұрын
I'm an EE I saw stuff like this all the time. Veracity is something management never heard of.
@privatepilot40647 ай бұрын
I’m blown away! I worked on the Navy’s A-7E in the mid 1970s and I was in VA-146 the Blue Diamonds! The aerial shot you have is of Lt. Neal O’Brian in 307! I worked on this actual airplane! You also have shots of a low passover of our sister squadron VA-147 the Argonauts at Naval Air Station Lemoore, CA. The A-7E was indeed a workhorse and lived up to its design. The A-7E had the more powerful Allison TF-41 Turbofan engine and an internal mounted gun. Awesome video! Very personal for me.
@funkywagnalls7 ай бұрын
I was in VA-25 in the mid 70's. Probably saw you in the chow hall.
@pfrstreetgang75117 ай бұрын
Did you catch the brake problem?
@privatepilot40647 ай бұрын
@@pfrstreetgang7511 Yeah, but it hapened a few years before I worked on them.
@privatepilot40647 ай бұрын
@@funkywagnalls No doubt! I really liked how they did the barracks.
@chuckwhitson6547 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing this story, cool stuff
@SimonAmazingClarke7 ай бұрын
I was a whistle blower. I was working on an operational aircraft that required a new check on the undercarriage torque links. What we didn't know was that they could be assembled upside leaving the Leg door rubbing on the hydraulic brake line. This could have resulted in brake failure. I was in the RAF so told my corporal. He did nothing. I told the Flight Sergant, he did nothing except ask the corporal. So I filled out a confidential report. A week later the investigation team showed up and the problem was acknowledged and a solution found.
@trespire7 ай бұрын
You did the right thing, it had to be done. I was airframe maintenance in the IAF on F-4E Kurnass / F-16C/D. As a young corpral I've grounded a few planes, no one asked any question. We had a saying, when in doubt, there is no doubt. Meaning not cleared for flight.
@stacymcmahon4536 ай бұрын
You did the right thing. Fittings or connectors that can be installed backwards, upside-down etc sound funny, but they can be very serious, as in your example. From the merely inconvenient, like the fuel line connector that was installed upside-down in my car by a mechanic and left me stranded in a conference center parking lot, to the potentially catastrophic like the identical connectors for fuel and high-pressure air in the engines of, if I recall, the DC-7 that could be (and at least once were) swapped so that activating the de-icing boots would pump raw fuel into them. Small bit of luck that this would also prevent the engine from starting, so there was no chance of blasting fuel into the de-icing boot in flight. But still...
@SimonAmazingClarke6 ай бұрын
@stacymcmahon453 Bliney, all interesting and surprising that they weren't designed foolproof.
@dugroz6 ай бұрын
Did you get any kind of commendation for your action?
@SimonAmazingClarke6 ай бұрын
@@dugroz Absolutely nothing.
@matthewk67317 ай бұрын
Before retiring, I was in charge of reviewing reports submitted by contractors to the city. Multiple reports by multiple contractors were deemed to be substandard. Many reports were clearly falsified. One contractor did it constantly. I went to multiple agencies in the state, and they all took a pass on investigating. They can't be bothered with thousands of instances of felony fraud.
@nco_gets_it7 ай бұрын
I always ask the same question wrt such things; who owns stock in what company or has some other business ties to what company? Corrupt business dealings are not just for elected persons you know...
@TheHistoryGuyChannel7 ай бұрын
Part of the reason that there was so little consequence is that this sort of fraud wasn’t uncommon. Although the brakes on a plane offer exceptional consequences…
@seatedliberty7 ай бұрын
Kind of ironic that when it came to exposing the truth about a defective brake, the whistleblower would stop at nothing.
@budbud37407 ай бұрын
Bravo!
@non55667 ай бұрын
So clever!
@RDEnduro7 ай бұрын
Well done
@navret17077 ай бұрын
And nothing could stop the whistle blower.
@matthewbyrd3987 ай бұрын
I see what you did there! Well played!
@Allan_aka_RocKITEman7 ай бұрын
*_"There's never enough time to do it right the first time, but there's always enough time to do it right the second time."_* - From a Chief Petty Officer I used to work for in the US Coast Guard
@bnewman437 ай бұрын
When I was a Navy CPO back in the 1970's I used to tell my men, "If you don't have time to do it right, how will you have time to do it over?" Same thought, different service, I guess.
@donaldhadley2497 ай бұрын
After the s h I t hits the fan
@privatepilot40647 ай бұрын
A very wise man.
@rickn8or7 ай бұрын
@@bnewman43, my Maintenance Master Chief stated it as "The same guy that won't give you the time to do it right will always give you time to do it over." (And we know Master Chiefs are never wrong.)
@FN_FAL_4_ever7 ай бұрын
@@rickn8or I've heard that once or twice in the Navy.
@jliller7 ай бұрын
Do you ever notice how when people say "mind your own business" they're almost always doing something they shouldn't be doing?
@RobotacularRoBob7 ай бұрын
Also it usually is supposed to be someone’s ‘business’ to ensure proper safety and ethics in certain lines of work.
@emberfist83477 ай бұрын
@@RobotacularRoBob Easy there you are exposing concepts foreign to business executives.
@rattelv4267 ай бұрын
@@emberfist8347Corporate Executives doing the maths - Chances of being caught X consequences Vs doing it legally & safely in the first place, depending on which one grants a greater profit.
@noneofyourbusiness436 ай бұрын
Untrue. Vast landscapes of context involved depending on the subject.
@kaptainkaos12027 ай бұрын
I was a QA personnel for a major military contractor. We provided depot level repairs for a communications system. A system came thru that I didn’t normally work on, a manager level QA person did that system. When I pulled the procedures paperwork I realized they didn’t even have a test bench for the system. When I brought that up I was told just sign and stamp the paperwork. I refused and had to quit. The manager had just been paper whipping the acceptance paperwork. I was so upset but I’ve been so lucky in my career.
@privatepilot40647 ай бұрын
You did the right thing. Sometimes it only takes one person to set things straight. Aerospace nowadays is a lot different. People are actually encouraged to speak up when something isn’t right. And when they do they’re rewarded for it instead of punished. That’s how it should have always been. Continual Improvement. Except for Boeing.
@kaptainkaos12027 ай бұрын
@@privatepilot4064 I used to go to Boeing as part of the Navy inspection team for one of the aircraft major system. We would document everything and Boeing would fight us tooth and nail. Then instead of fixing critical items we’d find they would go to the Program Office and get the office to accept the risk. My group got to be such a PITA to them they were able to have the program office take us out of the inspection cycle. After my last trip I came back and asked my boss who I’d have to bestow sex*al favors on to never go back to Boeing. The P-8 is a terrible platform. If the aircraft couldn’t do a particular portion of the P-3 mission the program office would change the requirements. Funny how many military members retired and were hired by Boeing after the cooling off time.
@pithicus527 ай бұрын
As a retired engineer involved in a lot of testing over the years, I am not surprised that this occurred. It is way too common in American industrial practice for managers to panic when major problems are found that would interfere with their schedules. Their response generally is to cover up the problem and then figure out who to blame it on later when it inevitably gets revealed. So it is no surprise that the managers involved in this situation never paid any price.
@recoilrob3247 ай бұрын
At a major aerospace company back in the late '80's I was doing an after heat treat 'check and adjust' some brackets before shipping them out. They were SO bad there was no way to save them and I told my supervisor that I had to scrap them. "They're just spares...ship 'em" was his response. I refused. He said "You're fired!" I told him he didn't have the authority to fire me and that I was NOT going to ship defective parts. We went up the chain of command to the Shop Director who was very upset to have to deal with me. "You need to do what your boss tells you to do". "He wants me to ship defective parts...do you want me to ship defective parts'? "Oh NO! But you have to do what your boss tells you to do". We went back and forth like this a few times until he realized that I was not going to budge...and that I also was going over his head if he pressed this issue". So he transferred me to another department. Seems like managers are like this all over the world...and that's a sad thing to say but it also explains a lot of the problems we keep seeing.
@erikkunkle95747 ай бұрын
I received a paddling in 3rd grade in the early 80s because a buddy of mine and I were in class and heard jets fly over. We jumped up excited and ran to the window and saw a flight of 2 or 3 A7s fly by at a distance that put them almost parallel to the 2nd floor window. Even though we had SC Air National Guard and Myrtle Beach AFB flying A7s, it was the only time I saw A7s in flight. Worth every smack to the behind.
@HootOwl5137 ай бұрын
Teacher was a Commie not to realize you were proud of America.
@insertjjs7 ай бұрын
I used to work for Vought at it's plant in Dallas where they made the A-7. And there were some old timers that told stories from the days of the Corsairs. One was from the -7D/E and the Vulcan Cannon. When they 1st put the gun on the Corsair, they went to do a ground test fire of the gun. And when they fired the gun, the recoil and vibration caused panels to pop open or fall off the aircraft like a cartoon
@adamhuckfeldt28957 ай бұрын
Just think, in 20 years he can do a video about the boeing scandal & all of the whistle-blowers that kept mysteriously dying. Looking forward to the video. Great stuff THG, keep the quality programming coming. Been watching you for a few years and looking forward to the future.
@RobotacularRoBob7 ай бұрын
What did the spring say when it popped out of the airplane causing it to crash? “Boeing! Boeing! Boeing!”
@FN_FAL_4_ever7 ай бұрын
If I may clarify further on the guns, the Navy A-7A/B/C variants had 2 internally mounted Colt Mk-12 20mm cannons (1 on each side). The Air Force's A-7D and the Navy's A-7E versions had the M-61 Vulcan. The Mk-12s were only able to carry 250 rounds each, while the M-61 Vulcan could carry 1,030 rounds of ammunition, plus the pilot could select a rate of fire from 4,000 to 6,000 rounds per minute. Back to the subject of topic, the general public really has no earthly idea as to the amount of fraud and corruption that occurs in military contracts. The list is just incredible, and our servicemen and women are expected to trust with their lives that the tools and weapons we give them will work. When you have huge defense conglomerates like Boeing and Lockheed-Martin lay in the same bed with our government that promise them large sums of money, OUR money, there's going to be corners cut and a lot of white washing of negative reports. That's just bound to happen.
@LRRPFco527 ай бұрын
JFK admin tried to start a new office of DoD Contract oversight due to how much waste, fraud, and abuse was built into the system by Mafia unions and locally-controlled companies used to this sort of contract skimming business. One of the candidates for that new office was Thomas D'Alesandro Jr. He came to interview for the job at the WH with his family, including his young beautiful daughter, Nancy. The Kennedy bros realized D'Alesandro Jr. was a Mafia stooge for the 5 families and was only handed his elections into Congress and Mayor of Baltimore with Mafia rigging and loyalty, so he was passed over for consideration. His daughter married a guy named Paul Pelosi in 1963 and later "got elected” into the House of Reps. You know her as Nancy Pelosi.
@hlynnkeith93347 ай бұрын
The senior test pilot at LTV was a friend. He loved the A-7. Said the A-7 was a dream to fly. Said the HUD was magic. Short aside: When General Dynamics prototyped the F-16, they needed a heads-up-display but did not have one. Someone from the Fort Worth plant called up LTV in Grand Prairie and asked if GD could borrow an A-7 HUD for their prototype. LTV agreed, and the A-7 HUB became the F-16 HUD.
@nicholasstephens13497 ай бұрын
My grandfather CDR Wayne Stephens was CO of VA-146 from 1969-71 and took the A-7E into combat for the first time. Thanks for using a photo from VA-146 in the video!!
@wmffmw7 ай бұрын
My father ran Grumman's Flight Test. They needed a test bed for the A6 Intruder. Their solution involved a Ford Body and a Cadillac Ambulance drive train equip with the brake under development. They needed something that would accelerate fast and stop in the length of their runway at Bethpage, NY. Once they were happy with assembly operation they moved on to testing with actual aircraft.
@ltdees23627 ай бұрын
.. 11:38 .. "these USAF A-7D's tail sign MB...Myrtle Beach." (Myrtle Beach South Carolina) I was stationed there, August 1970 to March 1974...Myrtle had 3 squadrons of A-7D's, under the 354th Tactical Fighter Wing...353rd 354th and 355th fighter squadrons respectfully. I was assigned to the 353rd as a life support tech...we maintained the pilots flight gear along with aircraft survival equipment. Each squadrons had 25 flight ready aircraft with 5 standby, 30 total...It was quite awesome to see 90 aircraft on the flight line. They were "beautiful birds" and fully loaded with ordinance...menacing...you didn't want to be on the receiving end!! When I arrived at Myrtle, we were getting the A7's new from Vaught. The buildup took about a year to fulfill the complement of 90 aircraft. We were training to deploy TDY to Korat Royal Thai Air Base Thailand...All 3 squadrons deployed October 1970 as we would be in direct support of Linebacker II. All squadron personnel would each have a 3 month rotation with option to extend another 3 months. I was there 12 months...The bombing of North Vietnam and Hiphong broke the back of the Viet Cong and all our POWs were released...I simply cannot explain that exhilaration, knowing I had a part in that...to this day I can tell you the names of each & every pilot in my squadron, they all returned from every mission 💖 Serving my country was best days of my life and I would gladly do it all over!! Col Wayne E Davis was my squadron commander...Full Bird Colonel...May you rest in peace sir (2016) you were an inspiration to me. A great leader with compassion, respect and humility for everyone who served under you. I have many fond memories of you and Myrtle Beach, we were truly "a band of brothers" and as you know, those of us who remained at Myrtle after retirement or discharge, remained close...God bless you sir and your beautiful family .. 🙏
@rpm120917 ай бұрын
Do you remember an A7 from Myrtle Beach crashing while TDY to Korat. The pilot was a Captain and a really nice guy and I cannot recall his name. This was early 1974. I was working the flight line that day and worked a red ball on his plane before it took off. I am 73 now and think about him everyday.
@ltdees23627 ай бұрын
@@rpm12091 If memory serve me, that would be Captain Lunsford...He was tall with dark, almost black hair. I had rotated back to Myrtle Dec 73 before that happened...and yes, he was a great guy! Lol, it's quite astounding to hear another voice from those days at MB and Korat !! Did you by chance know Sgt Bill Pruitt who worked at FMC? My Wife and I were good friends with him & his wife Jennie, we would play Pinochle every Friday night along with consuming too many beers!! I really miss those days at the Beach 💖
@shawnr7717 ай бұрын
Thank you for the lesson. This is cheap compared to the Littoral Combat Ship debacle currently playing out in the US.
@Lightning6137 ай бұрын
😱🤡 what a complete clown show the ‘Littoral Ship’ fiasco is.
@WALTERBROADDUS7 ай бұрын
@@Lightning613This week, the latest plan for the LCS is to send 6 them to Bahrain as Mine hunter ships.
@WALTERBROADDUS7 ай бұрын
Just this week there is an update on that. They are supposed to be sending a number of LCS to the Persian Gulf to support mine hunting operations.
@shawnr7717 ай бұрын
@@WALTERBROADDUS Every ship can be a minesweeper. Once.
@Lightning6137 ай бұрын
@@WALTERBROADDUS that’s an audacious plan and then some. The ships that are unable to get 10 nautical miles to sea without completely breaking down??!!!!
@stuartriefe17407 ай бұрын
Good morning class! Cheers to anyone who remembers the smell of mimeographs and watching film strips in school!
@RetiredSailor607 ай бұрын
And used the old fashioned paper cutter. Plus an overhead projector
@NoManClatuer-pd8ck7 ай бұрын
Put that slide ruler down buddy.
@brettany_renee_blatchley7 ай бұрын
And _Opaque Projectors!_ (WHAT did we budding nerds do before serving in AV Departments in high-school?? 😉)
@stuartriefe17407 ай бұрын
@@RetiredSailor60Good to hear from you Retired Sailor! Correct, I forgot those! 😊
@revvyhevvy7 ай бұрын
opague?? Maybe overhead?
@ghowell137 ай бұрын
Its a shame the new hire that found the original problem wasn't listened to in the first place. It could have stopped the whole fiasco. All the needed information seemed to be there to do so. Instead, B.F.G. decided to begin a coverup. All that money they wasted, only to end up "doing the right thing" in the end, at no expense to the taxpayer. But at what cost to all the employees there, involved, or otherwise? And to shareholders, during the time?
@tenhirankei7 ай бұрын
They didn't feel the need to correct the problem, until someone pointed it out to others.
@brainkill70347 ай бұрын
When family knows your misgivings and you don’t care, but it’s a big deal when other people find out, that double standard* in the morals of people is usually a sign of narcissism.
@MonkeyJedi997 ай бұрын
The sad truth is that this whole episode would be more remembered if there were dead pilots attached to the issue.
@HikaruKatayamma7 ай бұрын
It’s interesting that the people who are acting as whistle blowers are the ones who are punished for their actions.
@Gigi-ik3br7 ай бұрын
What a wonderfully beautiful kitty! Oh... Another great episode! Thank you for your content!
@roywhitworth7 ай бұрын
Video starts with THG hugging his catto. I love this! ❤
@BoSmith70457 ай бұрын
I worked on the AF A7. I can't say it was fun but I really do miss it sometimes.
@AJS867 ай бұрын
This is why the A7E is my favourite. A Basket for refuelling and a tail hook for braking.
@ThomasBurton-ue8pb7 ай бұрын
Immediate thumbs up for the History Cat.
@zcommodore7 ай бұрын
This caught my eye because I remember taking an erhics class in college where I was on a class team specifically assigned this particular case study to present to the class. I don't think this video sufficiently emphasized that the brake design had to be redesigned on order to meet requirements, but this redesign was done at company expense.
@tommyanderson-filmmaker39767 ай бұрын
As a USAF/ANG Rescue Chief we rolled on many A-7 Hot Brake emergencies.
@NelloCambelli7 ай бұрын
Your episodes are presented in interesting, factual manner - you have done well since less than 50,000 subs.
@01nmuskier7 ай бұрын
This is a great example of "military grade" meaning "built by the lowest bidder".
@blackhawk7r2217 ай бұрын
If we need a high tolerance and precision part manufactured, we are going to use the company who can produce the required spec part for the lowest cost. Lowest cost has nothing to do with low quality.
@HossBlacksilver7 ай бұрын
Now it's not lowest bidder, it's highest campaign contributor
@RobotacularRoBob7 ай бұрын
@@blackhawk7r221low cost absolutely affects quality. It means people are paid less, material quality is compromised and QA checks are minimal or fudged to keep beancounters happy.
@blackhawk7r2217 ай бұрын
@@RobotacularRoBob You do not understand. The government lays out a specification beforehand, and that spec determines quality. From there, they simply choose whatever company can produce that component for the lowest cost. At no time does level of quality suffer. Remember, we are speaking specifically of government procurement, not low cost Chinese trash in a Walmart shelf.
@HossBlacksilver7 ай бұрын
@@blackhawk7r221 with the corruption rife in government I'm not so sure about that.
@herrunsinn7747 ай бұрын
It is fortunate for Vandivier that he didn't work for Boeing. He probably would not have lived to tell the tale.
@TheHistoryGuyChannel7 ай бұрын
I know!
@ricksaint20007 ай бұрын
Thank you History Guy
@BasicDrumming7 ай бұрын
I appreciate you and thank you for making content.
@Allan_aka_RocKITEman7 ай бұрын
Great video...👍
@paulforester69967 ай бұрын
I sanded down A7 for the 185th in Iowa. I was in a civilian program in highschool. It was a very interesting experience.
@QuantumRift7 ай бұрын
Wow, thank you! I KNOW of this scandal. When I was in the US Army, I was stationed at Field Station Kunia on Oahu, near Schofield Barracks. Some of my spare time was taking classes offered by then Hawaii Pacific University, on Schofield Barracks. One of the classes intrigued me, it was a "Business Ethics" class. I signed up for it and the subject of our first discussion was this very scandal! I had to write a paper on this and all the players here you mention, B.F. Goodrich and LTV, well, yea, I know. The other thing I had to do was a research paper, and I chose, well, the Ford Pinto and Ford's 'homicide' case... THANK YOU!!!
@mauricedavis21607 ай бұрын
THANK YOU HISTORY GUY&TEAM...🙏✨👌🦉🥰🐲💖
@joegreen94197 ай бұрын
I worked on the A7 aircraft in VA 122 in NAS Lemoore and in VA 153 aboard CVA34 in the Tonkin Gulf. I was in the airframe shop so we were in charge of changing the brakes so this story was very interesting to me.
@soonerlon7 ай бұрын
Excellent video sir. I used to work at the facility that did the major overhauls for these aircraft and it was in the early to mid "80's when they were phased out of inventory. IIRC the Puerto Rican Air National Guard was the last U.S. operator. One of my former supervisors was an engineer for his aircraft - perhaps the next time I see him I'll inquire about this mess.
@AlanToon-fy4hg7 ай бұрын
I am an aviation buff and scale modeler and have read books on the A-7. None mentioned this scandal at all...
@frankgulla23357 ай бұрын
Thank you, THG. I knew of but had forgotten this case and you revealed a few details that I did not remember. Thank you.
@richardpatton25027 ай бұрын
Your cat has a nice tuxedo 😂 All the best to everyone
@arailway88096 ай бұрын
Thanks for the tour, History Guy. They fired the guns on a test stand early in the morning, Bur-ump. LTV lost a test pilot on the runway in about that time period.
@StoneCresent7 ай бұрын
I remember seeing this covered briefly in one of my college textbooks. It failed to mention when the scandal took place or that it affected the Air Force model.
@redlabel92947 ай бұрын
LOVE your channel THG, and have seen many of your videos over the years. My dad's love of the A7 (and A4 and F4) after he served on the USS Ticonderoga, was instilled in me as a young child, growing-up in the 70s and 80s. I built more than a few plastic models of those aircraft. But I would be lying if I didn't admit that what drove me to click on this video was you holding your cute kitty-cat! 😂
@steveshoemaker63477 ай бұрын
l lost some of my friend flying the A-7 during the Vietnam war.....Thank THG🎀 Old F-4 Phantom ll fighter jet pilot Shoe🇺🇸
@rickthorp83636 ай бұрын
I had to do a case study on this incident in college for my business degree. Was one of the more interesting things I learned early on about business ethics.
@Paladin18737 ай бұрын
My single most extensive contract oversight experience was as an Air Force human engineer monitoring part of a huge Boeing air defense system being built for the Royal Saudi Air Force, but this was in the 1980s before their employees kept having so many fatal accidents.
@ZenZaBill6 ай бұрын
As another retired engineer, who wrote, executed, ran test programs and wrote the reports, i found this very interesting and informative. It's true - some upper management would like to 'adjust' parameters to appear to be in-spec. to more upper management, and customers, to hit those published milestone dates.
@kennyhagan57817 ай бұрын
William Proxmire, how long has it been since I have heard that name? Wow, I must have gotten old over the years...😅😅😅😅
@Wil_Liam17 ай бұрын
Sadly,this type of behavior is the normal of humanity and of all countries and not solely an isolated incident... 😔
@stuartcunnington62837 ай бұрын
Greetings brother,I thoroughly enjoy your episodes and you have an awesome cat too.Kindest regards, Stuart.✌️👍
@paulkirkland32637 ай бұрын
Very interesting. I love this channel.
@michaelsteiger85097 ай бұрын
I flew the A-7D for a few years.. actually to the end…. The brakes were always an issue. We had a 10000 ft runway and tried to make the 7000 ft turn off at a 130kt touchdown speed…. It was 50/50 if you would get “hot brakes” . A ground crew would run out and put a wax stick on the brake to see if they were “hot” . It was a normal thing. Hot brakes that is…. I will say this, I had to stop one landing when a plane taxied onto the runway after I touched down and I just pushed the brakes and the anti skid cycled. 3000ft from touch to stop. The brakes worked…. And melted…. It closed the runway until they jacked the plane and put 2 fresh assemblies on it. I never knew why this plane always was the hot brake queen…. Great story…
@jasonz77887 ай бұрын
Great work Sir thank you
@LMacNeill7 ай бұрын
Google has clearly put their godawful AI in charge of automated closed-captioning. Not once did it print the word "brake" in this video. It was always "break." One time it was "Brak" with the capital B is if it thought it were a name (and why it had no E anywhere to be found is a complete mystery). The craziest mistake I saw, though, was Miss Deeds instead of misdeeds. Seriously? When in the hell has Miss Deeds ever been used in anything anywhere at any time? AI is most definitely not ready for prime time.
@anthrax25257 ай бұрын
All A-7 models had guns. The original Navy models had a pair of Colt Mk12 20 millimeter cannon. The A-7D replaced those with a General Electric M-61 Vulcan 20mm cannon.
@privatepilot40647 ай бұрын
The A-7E had the M-61 also. I think it was part of the “E” package upgrade along with the Allison TF-41 engine.
@georgeburns72517 ай бұрын
Excellent comment
@seandobson4997 ай бұрын
So, an honest man trying to do the right thing was thrown to the Wolves and the guilty got away with it, I would like to say that this has never happened in the UK, but it has and still does, but at least you have shone a light on the way an honest man paid the price for others, thumbs up to you.
@kimmer67 ай бұрын
G.I. Joe hardhat diver in the background, vintage 1970. Night visioned spider smashing mini panther in the foreground for a while. Great story, THG, thank you.
@egyeneskifli78087 ай бұрын
The early naval A-7 variants (A/B/C) all had guns. Two of them, both sides of the intake. But those were Colt Mk 12 single barreled revolver guns. The A-7D (and the A-7E) had a single M61 Vulcak on the bottom left side of the intake.
@radiosnail7 ай бұрын
Very interesting. Lovely moggy too
@kellybasham31137 ай бұрын
Love your videos
@leftseat307 ай бұрын
Nice to see your cat help tell the story
@Sandstroem827 ай бұрын
We had this as a case study in engineering ethics class here in Sweden when I was a student 20 years ago. Interesting story
@SSRCalifornia7 ай бұрын
Very interesting. I have long been a fan of the A7 and had never heard of this scandal before.
@sharylkriete7 ай бұрын
Thank you for these informative videos, i really have been enjoying them. Your cat is adorable! What is his/her name?
@TheHistoryGuyChannel7 ай бұрын
Pocky
@barkingbaby257 ай бұрын
Love the beautiful cat!!
@PeteDriver5307 ай бұрын
my Dad worked on F-4s for many years with the USAF and ANG as both crew chief and QA inspector. he could be critical of most other aircraft, but he spoke well of the A-7. despite the unofficial "SLUF" nickname it was a good jet, tough and reliable, with a bomb nav system that could drop a highdrag in your mailbox, or something like that 😁 love the kitteh!!
@MightyMezzo7 ай бұрын
Hello History Cat!
@HM2SGT7 ай бұрын
😻🫶 *Doubly blessed, not just another fascinating presentation by THG, but moggie co-presenter.* 😊
@joeblow50377 ай бұрын
good stuff old Phantom wrench appreciates you
@Techo13297 ай бұрын
There will always be a set percentage who are susceptible to taking shortcuts, and when a few of them end up in the same workplace they'll cause problems.
@VespasianJudea7 ай бұрын
I live about 20 minutes away from Troy. We did a lot for our old war efforts, now they call us a flyover state despite 25 Fortune 500 companies being based here.
@tjwelch627 ай бұрын
Being a so-called “flyover state” is a plus these days, with both coasts mired in foolishness and poor work ethics.
@johnpublic65827 ай бұрын
I'm just worried about getting hit when their fly-over turns out to be a crash.
@robinseibel75407 ай бұрын
@@tjwelch62, right. So no "foolishness" and no "lack of ethics" exists between the coasts. Generalizations inevitably fail, and dumb ones fail quickly. Yours is a lazy generalization with no factual basis and definitely no accompanying robust data set and rigorous statistical analysis. You should note that your assumptions and biases do not qualify as anything remotely resembling a factual basis. Your comments do reflect poor or absent critical thinking skills.
@praetor6787 ай бұрын
@@robinseibel7540 You sound like a manager trying to keep your department's reports worry free for the higher ups.
@cathyrowe5947 ай бұрын
@robinseibel7540 His remarks are repeatedly proven on the nightly news reports of both mainstream & online agencies. But, your snarky, know-it-all comment proves your residency in one of the mentioned coastal regions & total adherence to said muck-mired political beliefs!😂😂😂
@hckyplyr92857 ай бұрын
USAF was not that impressed with either the Phantom or Corsair II but was directed to purchase both by Robert Strange McNamara. TAC and ADC strongly preferred the F-105 and F-106, respectively. Opinion on the Phantom was mixed in USAF.....it was large and powerful and could carry a large load, but it cruised much slower than either the -105 or -106 and was a less accurate bomb platform. With regard to the A-7D, TAC couldn't get rid of them fast enough and transferred them to the ANG while they were being built. That was the first time ANG had received new build aircraft straight from the factory. However, ANG did love them and operated them for 20 years.
@gort82037 ай бұрын
USAF certainly preferred the F-105 over the A-7 for strike, but it ended up preferring the A-7 over the A-1 for Close Air Support, which is what it was bought for at the insistence McNamara to make the Army happy. The F-106 was not really an alternative to the F-4. The F-4 was adopted by USAF to fill an urgent need for a new tactical fighter. As a dedicated bomber interceptor for ADC the F-106 was unsuited for a role for which the F-4 was ready.
@privatepilot40647 ай бұрын
The Allison TF-41 completely changed the A-7 from the original Pratt & Whitney TF30 engine. It was a great improvement.
@gort82037 ай бұрын
@@privatepilot4064 The plane must have been quite a dog with the TF-30 because even with the TF41 I'm told its thrust/weight was not very impressive.
@georgeburns72517 ай бұрын
@@gort8203actually, the airforce wanted F5 instead of A7s. They were faster and sexier, but could only carry 5% of the bomb load and only had 10% of the range.
@gort82037 ай бұрын
@@georgeburns7251 I don't believe USAF seriously considered acquiring the F-5 for service as a tactical fighter. They did the Skoshi Tiger combat evaluation to demonstrate its capability to the foreign market for which it had been developed. The F-5A was barely supersonic when clean, and it was no competition for the A-7 in terms of range, payload, or avionics. USAF already had one lightweight fighter with limited range and payload and I doubt they wanted another one. I'm sure there were pilots in the air force who wanted the F-5 instead of the A-7, but I have never heard that the service wanted that. Can you point to documentation?
@JamesLogan-x1f7 ай бұрын
Buttercup and Whiskers are happy to see the new history cat.
I had a manger tell me - back in the late 90s working It in a major manufacturing plant in Springfield, Ohio - "It's more important for it (software) on time, than for it to work."
@georgegonzalez24767 ай бұрын
I knew a guy that managed software development for a small company. Often the software wouldn't be done in time for shipping the equipment, so the company would find the very slowest shipper that would take more than a week to get anywhere. They'd meanwhile be furiously working on the software, which could be air mailed to the destination. (Before the Internet).
@billschlafly41077 ай бұрын
I studied engineering ethics a few decades ago and I'm shocked this story wasn't included. We studied the shuttle disaster and the Ford Pinto and the hotel in Kansas City MO that resulted in the deaths of many people because of a collapsed catwalk. Oh and the Tacoma Narrows bridge was extra fun because the guy who was charged with buying insurance pocketed the money...thinking that bridges don't collapse.
@rbaxter2867 ай бұрын
Still was seeing an A-7 'drop' a puddle of hydraulic fluid on the flight deck after landing on into the 1980s. Had quite a reputation for it, too.
@anthonyshaw93837 ай бұрын
I was just in the very test lab yesterday.
@elgatofelix89177 ай бұрын
The History Cat is always cool. His furry feline friend seems pretty cool too. 😺😸😻
@paulwoodman51317 ай бұрын
Thank You. Very interesting. This case is taught in ethics class. A small slice of military industrial complex.
@shadetreemech2906 ай бұрын
When I was stationed on the USS Eisenhower in the early 1980s we lost an A7 over the side when the brakes failed. It went over the edge of the flight deck and landed in the water upside down so the piolet could not eject. We lost both the piolet and the aircraft. RIP
@HellJustFroze7 ай бұрын
unrelated aside: thank you for being a youtuber I can disable DeArrow for, you never use clickbait bullshit titles and I appreciate this
@carguybikeguy7 ай бұрын
I am so happy to see your tuxie murderfloof cohosting with you! Kitteh loves all around! 0:30
@bluejedi7237 ай бұрын
never heard of this case, ever! Thank you for sharing it
@tstahler54207 ай бұрын
I wish my dad were alive, he'd have some input on this story. In 1968 and '69 he worked as a consultant at LTV and he loved the A-7 like it was one of his kids.
@donaldjones35807 ай бұрын
I worked on the Navy's A-7C and E models in 1969 to 1974, but as an electrician at NARF Jax, no knowledge of brakes. Not long after this asbestos brake pads were banned, wonder how that effected the brakes. This was interesting.
@RCAvhstape7 ай бұрын
On the differences between the USAF and Navy versions of the A-7, there was a sea story* I heard once. A couple of USAF A-7's landed at a Navy base in California, and in addition to fuel, the pilots asked the Navy guys to recharge the pilot oxygen systems. Apparently, Navy A-7's used a higher pressure O2 system than the USAF version, but nobody told the poor young petty officer who was sent out to the flightline with an oxygen cart. He plugged in the cart, cranked up the pressure and opened the valve. The Corsair promptly exploded! I saw a photo: the engine was sitting there surrounded by airplane parts. They sailor was thought to be dead, but they couldn't find his body. A couple of days later he showed up and explained: After the plane blew up, he took off running and hopped the fence to go hide out in town, thinking that for sure he was going to burn for this. I didn't hear what they actually did to the guy, but I'm guessing he didn't get punished as bad as he was expecting lol. *In US Navy/Marine parlance, a "sea story" is a story which may be true or may be complete BS or something in between.
@privatepilot40647 ай бұрын
Well told! Have you met the infamous “Sea Lawyer”? The guy that purportedly knew all the regulations. Best wishes!
@RCAvhstape7 ай бұрын
@@privatepilot4064 Oh yeah. Sea lawyers, lollygoggers, pogues, various types of shitbird, you name it.
@brucelytle11447 ай бұрын
The difference between a fairy tale and a sea story is that one starts out "Once upon a time", the other starts out "This ain't no shit".
@donaldjones35807 ай бұрын
I would say the young petty officer didn't read the placard at the connection and take note!
@RCAvhstape7 ай бұрын
@@brucelytle1144 Exactly!
@mobiusd98857 ай бұрын
This is one of the cases that was covered in an engineering ethics course I took in college.
@beefsuprem02417 ай бұрын
I remember my early days in the comms industry and managers were only interested in the next 48hrs. Any reports of defects, system faults or dodgy contractors cutting corners or downright not doing their job were waved away. Always, always email and CC concerns to more than one person and you may actually get things done.
@jroar1237 ай бұрын
I video taped this aircraft crashing outside Dobbins ARB in Marietta GA. back in the 90’s. If it had stayed in the air 5 seconds longer it would have crashed into my condo. The Pilot ejected but his shoot failed to open and he ended up in a coma for 3 months. The aircraft hit an apartment complex and killed 3 people. The pilot was doing touch and goes, which was not uncommon to see next to the base.
@privatepilot40647 ай бұрын
I remember that on the news. I worked on A-7Es in the Navy.
@jroar1237 ай бұрын
@@privatepilot4064 Then you saw my video tape!
@stevehageman67857 ай бұрын
In the 21st Century, Corporate America has shortened the oft quoted phrase: "There is never enough time to do it right, but always enough time to do it again" to, simply "There is never time to do it right PERIOD"
@kathyware98567 ай бұрын
Hi THG and Pocky.
@Torahboy16 ай бұрын
Yey! Go ! History Cat !! History the d-purrrves to be remembered
@jimshorts67517 ай бұрын
Them's the brakes...
@mikemoore40337 ай бұрын
“Corporate ethics”, sounds like an oxymoron.
@thatguy60547 ай бұрын
Has anybody actually working around the A-7 day-to-day ever called it Corsair II? I've only ever heard them called simply A-7 or SLUF (Short Little Ugly F*****).
@privatepilot40647 ай бұрын
When I was in the Navy I never heard it called a SLUF. I think that was an Air Force term. We just referred to it as a Corsair.
@clazy87 ай бұрын
Ugly for sure
@thatguy60547 ай бұрын
@@privatepilot4064 - That makes sense, since the Navy and Marines have history with and reverence for Vought's F4U Corsair and for the the Air Force it was the little brother to the B-52, a.k.a. BUFF (Big Ugly Fat F*****).
@StevenDietrich-k2w7 ай бұрын
Well we made it to Friday. That is some history worth celebrating right there.
@Notyou55567 ай бұрын
A7 also had a tire problem, as they came apart on landing.