What Would It Take To Sink USS Gerald R Ford Aircraft Carrier?

[@TheInfographicsShow]

If you should number your favourite movies including ships what would the order from 5 to 1 be? Which film genre would you choose - romance or action?

[@cheesepuffs5226]

cool 99 redwooolfttw well this is probably on the internet so it’s open to anyone

[@cheesepuffs5226]

cool 99 redwooolfttw by that I mean the information on the ship

[@MadMax0417]

@@Mdot-6 this is all already public information, if a youtube channel with no clearance on any information can get this information, whats stopping opposing forces?

[@insertcomicalphraseman8330]

This was an unescarilly long video just to hit the 10 minute Mark to get ads. I know why your doing and I get but don't put in with filler but maybe a montage of actual good content instead of filler

[@kenjihayashi668]

if not a neer peer war few would try to sink a carrier.the attack would force the u.s. to incinerate the attacker.

[@laurenceandringa]

"Every ship is unsinkable, until it sinks". Admiral Michiel de Ruyter

[@SpoilerAlert__]

You're alive till you ain't

[@nasimashima9585]

Best quote ever !

[@Sultan-qk3od]

😁

[@Janco1803]

Admiraal michiel de ruyter was een held

[@raulsalazar05]

Best obvious quote ever!!!

[@quantomic1106]

Rule no. 1 Never call a ship "Unsinkable".

[@chrisflynn4655]

The Green Bay Packers are Unsinkable

[@zacharywilburn7253]

Lol yup

[@godlymonkekyes2451]

2 words: titanic Yamato.

[@superpussycat6648]

What if it is made in styro?

[@jacquesford4095]

Unsinkable the 2nd

[@jillssandwiches42069]

“ferb, I know what we’re gonna do today!”

[@skipscrop]

Underrated comment

[@bigboyi4367]

SkipScrop indeed

[@ryanmoore2464]

Aren’t you a little old to be sinking a battleship? Yes

[@IshijimaKairo]

Let's si *nk the U.S.S Gerald R. Ford*

[@jillssandwiches42069]

@@IshijimaKairo do you have or know how to make an experimental railgun?

[@CONSOLETRUTH2]

What could sink a FORD class carrier? Probably a CHEVROLET class carrier.

[@ArkAstral]

LOL

[@user-7165jdhrnxymzn]

1 torpedo

[@esalvador4197]

@@user-7165jdhrnxymzn 1 torpedo ain't even enough to sink a ship

[@kaulumapaulus9234]

😂😂😂

[@xela6349]

@@esalvador4197 It totally is. At the right place, it can be devastating.

[@TRheraklesTR]

*Iceberg: "Hold my beer..."*

[@dvan0914]

LOL

[@nadunwijesinghe965]

Hahahaha this should be in the top comments

[@i-love-comountains3850]

With the amount of firepower on that ship, let alone the entire battlegroup, surely it could break up a sizeable iceberg. I have a hunch the military may have already tested this prospect.

[@TC-yp2bm]

@@i-love-comountains3850 r/whooooosh

[@ceramite3692]

R/WOOOOOOOOSH

[@pauln9415]

"Unsinkable as some claim"..... Reminds me of something from history... Hope it has iceberg detection.

[@chaoticwj1772]

Paul N modern Carriers could take a hit from an Iceberg. The double hull would protect it.

[@bogustoast22none25]

I swear if an iceberg take a ship like this down I am losing it.

[@stansbornak8116]

Container ships are the US navy's mortal enemy

[@wz5110]

Iceberg with a hydrogen bomb oof

[@daigurenH]

@@chaoticwj1772 What if its a double iceberg?

[@tsarkaiser6254]

Chinese: WRITE THAT DOWN! WRITE THAT DOWN!

[@tlotlisomoletsane3598]

You mean 写下来

[@Slycarlo]

Nah they can’t even find a cure for ncov ard 19

[@wish6150]

@@Slycarlo and the US cant even solve school shooting problems

[@bansyiemlieh3213]

😂

[@DevinEMILE]

WSH WSH how would you solve the problem?

[@edoggydawg]

Infographics: How to sink the USS Gerald China: I’m listening

[@mohit4387]

Ur life will now be monitored by the the Americans and the Chinese

[@MelanieDManning]

WRITE THAT DOWN WRITE THAT DOWN

[@chromite_chromite]

Looking at Japan: ) ] [ Looking at USA: ]

[@egg-...]

I laughed when reading this comment

[@anandanr]

How many Gerald R Ford carriers are there? The vessel is scheduled to be commissioned in 2020, while further ships of the class will enter service at five-year intervals. A total of ten Ford-class carriers are planned with construction continuing to 2058. CVN 78 will replace USS Enterprise (CVN 65), which entered service in 1961 and decommissioned in 2017.

[@darrenspohn8376]

So far, most unsinkable ships that have been made are sitting on the bottom of the ocean.

[@RR-us2kp]

Titanic was unsinkable. Sank on the first voyage

[@MagicRabbit]

So far, not a single carrier of the USA was sunk since 1942

[@RR-us2kp]

@@MagicRabbit That's because there are no wars against developed nations. America has yet to face a military like Chinese or Russian. All they fought in the recent past are 3rd world countries.

[@EasyIn60Seconds]

@@RR-us2kp Are you even for real? Watch the clip from WW2 and borrow some sense.

[@RR-us2kp]

@@EasyIn60Seconds what are you talking about? We're talking about modern supercarriers here. How the hell does ww2 aircraft carriers matter here. Back then even US didn't have any supercarriers. Their aircraft carriers were the same size as others of the era. Do you have any idea about what we are talking?

[@qingruiscookery]

USS Gerald R Ford: I am unsinkable! *Titanic has joined the chat* *Bismarck has joined the chat* *Yamato has joined the chat* *Musashi has joined the chat* *HMS Hood has joined the chat*

[@kaydenchan7093]

*Costa Concordia has joined the chat*

[@tacticallypanda4716]

Lol

[@srymybad3548]

The reason why the Bismarck and the Yamato sank was because of poor Damage Control training. The sailors onboard was not trained or equipped well enough to take on the tasks of damage control. Could an enemy damage a carrier, yes. Could an enemy sink it, very unlikely.

[@bernardedwards8461]

@@srymybad3548 The main reason that the Yamato was sunk, and its sister ship Musashi, was that they had no aircover. This would not apply to a carrier.

[@srymybad3548]

@@bernardedwards8461 You are expected to take damage in battle. How you recover is absolutely key!!

[@VIIIrats]

Ah yes, i too carry 162 anti-air guns on my person for “self defense”

[@garethpreston8275]

I conceal carry just a single invasion ready USS Gerald R Ford super carrier at home in the evening. The one time I don't have it China will be lurking around the back yard.

[@Prokerboss]

Pathetic, I myself carry 5 bfg 10000s on my person at all times (I take 10 if I ever go outside)

[@charlessmith8679]

Glad to know I'm not alone, but I also use thaad missile defense systems

[@marvinthomas9897]

'Murica. *happy tears*

[@mako8040]

The 3rd ww be like: "Well NATO, you see, we have been watching The Infographics Show, so now you dead"

[@bhartidesai3522]

Mako u predicted it

[@watermelonwelder3064]

Bruh we will wreck you with that carrier, and I don’t think that a aircraft carrier goes alone

[@scottdenn5545]

Theres so many weapons (offense/defense) on that ship, that it could collapse any country all while defending itself. That ship is its own island carrying all the top technology, most isnt even advertised.

[@Mister_Rat_]

TIS the best counter intelligence yt channel out there tbh

[@laksamanasuhendra5868]

@@watermelonwelder3064 enemy: *attacks carrier* America: TIS BUT A SCRATCH

[@sharpshooter13ify]

Carrier: I’m unsinkable Anti ship missile: allow me to introduce myself and my cousins, the torpedo, the cruise missile and our distant cousin the iceberg .

[@jaketang892]

Underrated 😂😂😂

[@juanmiguelperalta772]

@Leo Li nature: allow me to introduce myself and my cousins storms, typhoon and whirlpool

[@harrisoncraig3915]

@@juanmiguelperalta772 america: allow me to introduce my reverse card and my distant cousin the block card.

[@anusmcgee4150]

@@harrisoncraig3915 *Trump card

[@playaprods]

One word: Nuke.

[@soggycereal16]

This is how you get on the FBI's watchlist.

[@MuchTooStress]

No this is how you get on the Department of Naval Intelligence “list”

[@MrErgenta]

That's the NSA's job

[@karanmedhane835]

Jim Bob Lol

[@1Learn2Swim3]

@Jim Bob hahaha you ain't lying man

[@1Learn2Swim3]

@FBI 🥺🤔

[@richardstraus4493]

Gerald R Ford: “Im unsinkable” Titanic 🚢 is typing...

[@buehae1091]

Godzilla and Kong are typing....

[@zerixor8134]

*One swedish submarine boi:* *"Hold my torpedo"*

[@PROJECTDARKPHOENIX]

my point exactly

[@skalmaa]

Was that the submarine that used a older type of machinery to move around? there for avoiding sonar by not making barely any sound at all

[@implodingbaby]

@@skalmaa the swedish sub used a Stirling engine to power it so it was ridiculously quiet.

[@zoom5024]

@@implodingbaby still using em. And in 2021 they're getting the A26 model sub thats even quieter then the Gotland class.

[@robertharris6092]

And sweden gave them all the info neccisary to detect the thing and even sold america one of the subs to research.

[@hundreadrides7730]

Gordon Ramsay's insults would sink it in seconds

[@delightfulThoughs]

Yep..of Gordon Ramsay gets on board for a kitchen inspection will go out of order in no time..Lol

[@thetruthhurts4054]

Your face would kurdel milk.

[@michaelh2013]

When you locate the lamb sauce in the USS Gerald Ford

[@miguelcastillo9589]

THIS SHIP ISN'T GOOD ENOUGHHH!!!! WHAT ARE YOU DOING YOU FUCKIN DONKEY!!!?? IT'S RAWWWW!!!!

[@Silver09346]

this ship is bland ! horrible..

[@tnerbtnerb5136]

Some claim its unsinkable. Me: Is it a permanent land mass with firm attachments to the sea floor? No... Me: Then its sinkable.

[@NocturnalRxinbows]

Strongest Earthquake Ever Recorded: Hold my beer

[@minecartrider7057]

Yo mom: hold my beer

[@NocturnalRxinbows]

Category 5 Hurricane: Hold my beer

[@spatsky]

tnerb tnerb But even firm attachments to the ground are sinkable.

[@777Outrigger]

No one claims a carrier is unsinkable. Just very difficult to sink. Straw man argument.

[@JohnAnderssonTV]

Americans: It's unsinkable! Some Swede in a diesel submarine: *Wanna bet?*

[@jaumeferrer4868]

Very underrated

[@rodfel2001]

Marvelous answer ... we're smarter than they think ...

[@Callsign_Prophet]

@@rodfel2001 I don't think anyone intelligent doubts anybody else's intelligence.

[@e.s.6275]

Not a conventional diesel though! they run on a Stirling cycle principle, thus very quiet!

[@rodfel2001]

@@e.s.6275 Silence is gold in warfare ...

[@pwrbyford68]

Navy vet here (Former FC stationed on a few carriers). Watch the documentary about sinking the USS Oriskany. They went through a lot of effort to ensure it sunk. 50 + years later, carriers are designed better to take more hits. During wartime there will always be a ship alongside a carrier. We were rarely left alone. They're too valuable to leave vulnerable like that.

[@dadthelad]

Sure, but they weren't trying to sink it with missiles w nuclear war heads on them either! I somehow suspect a carrier couldn't survive one of those.

[@pwrbyford68]

@@dadthelad Look up operation crossroads, they did nuclear bomb testing on/near ships in the 1940s. Many survived nuclear blasts, including a few aircraft carriers. The issue was the radioactive materials embedded into the ships hulls that sealed their fate.

[@dawsonkozel4171]

@@pwrbyford68 bet now aircraft carriers have sprinklers to wash off radio active particles and at bets they could survive 1 but 2 and it’s done when hit dead on

[@dawsonkozel4171]

@@dadthelad they did try miss,es, in fact they tried many conventnal weapons, also using a nuke would just cause even more escalation so it would be heavily unlikely

[@raiderfandew]

Modern day missiles have changed the game dramatically over what they had to deal with in WWII.

[@moneyandtimefreedom3352]

STEP 1, TO SINK A SHIP: say it is unsinkable

[@jano867]

Titanic

[@empiur]

Ships used in nuclear tests are nearly never hit directly. In most cases, ships taking nuclear explosions in tests are from nearby to, not onto, the ship themselves. Any nuclear weapon used directly on a ship would definitely sink it.

[@michaelquintana678]

Moneyat F ya urs is the best one so far.. were not sinkable go back to bed..

[@WilliamStewart1]

@@empiur A single nuclear missle wouldn't be able to sink it thanks to the onboard anti missle systems. You'd have to send a barrage and hope 1 sneaks through.

[@korbingaming7669]

Fun fact China has warships with high powered rail guns so rail guns can take it down

[@mhazg6621]

Bermuda Triangle: hold my 'megalodons'*

[@1copperfly]

Nice comment.

[@sixfiftylaloba1773]

Lol

[@fka_the_body1542]

Joker😏

[@bowgamer1004]

Japanese: this is the most powerful battleship America:my name Jeff

[@jeffspicoli5399]

And what a cool name that is lol 😊

[@robertorange6024]

Carriers are incredibly tough to sink. Check out the Bikini Atoll nuclear tests. The USS Saratoga (CV-3) didnt sink when the first one went off. Also the USS Kitty Hawk was used as a test platform to see what it would take to sink a modern carrier. The Navy was surprised on how hard it was to sink her using missiles, bombs, and torpedoes. Are carriers indestructible? No. But they are very hard to sink successfully.

[@susanchin4117]

I thought A Electromagnetic Railgun may be able to sink any aircraft carrier. The railgun will drill into the body of the carrier and explode inside. Unlike the torpedoes only damage the outer body of the carrier. That is my understanding. correct me if I am wrong.

[@scotttild]

@The Quiet Kid China is already pushing carriers further and further out because of their hypersonic weapons, carriers have no reasonable defense. Carriers are a total and utter waist of money. They are only useable in smaller regional conflicts with less sophisticated weapons. ie Gulf War. Even in that case we could have launched everything from SA and it most likely would have cost half as much.

[@wallinollipekka]

You don't need sunk USS aircraft carrier to counter it's threat for long time.

[@wizardtim8573]

@@susanchin4117 I believe it depends on the torpedo. The older versions relied on delivering an explosive payload to the ship itself, but the new ones rely on blasting a cavity of water out from under them that can snap a large ship in half.

[@susanchin4117]

@@wizardtim8573, Ohoo, that’s fantastic.

[@amadeospapa5673]

Kim Jong Un's Weight: *"Hold my beer"*

[@micha3ldc525]

*Hold my cheese*

[@solargamer7780]

“Hold my missiles”

[@kevinbranch7855]

LOL !!! 😂😂😂

[@darthslackus499]

Hold my non-existence nuclear missiles I've keep saber rattling so the US and other countries would pony up some cash

[@2silver144]

XD

[@lordkarasu2263]

“And none so more then The Yamato”. *bismark cries in the corner*

[@jacknjayplayz6380]

well i mean the bismarck was an amazing ship but i dont think it could compete with ther iowa or yamato class battleships

[@Kelekky]

Jack n Jay playz it can Hood: yea i got killed in 1 salvo even tho i am the royal navy’s pride and joy

[@Shinmations]

@@Kelekky its just a lucky shot it hits the ammunition locker which ignited the Hood and blew it into pieces

[@Kelekky]

ZdeZ Animates it had a weak deck armor

[@gabrielplays5115]

@@Kelekky maybe it has a chance if it was a short to medium range battle... but if it was a long range battle i dont thinkit has a chance

[@timw5466]

The survivability of any surface vessel predominantly depends on the bravery, and competence of the crew manning their stations.

[@thecrazysunflower9360]

In Soviet Russia, Ship sinks Iceberg

[@CP4884]

Fooddr dose viss smawl amedican bddaains, dees ees juk.

[@wadopotato33]

You have to have functioning ships first.

[@6421rich]

Crane sinks aircraft carrier

[@КГБ-л3п]

@@wadopotato33 they are more functional then French ones.

[@CM-ve1bz]

The Crazy Sunflower The Russians claim the Japanese surrendered in ww2 because of them, so sinking an iceberg should be a piece of cake.

[@cmshottie62]

The next super carrier will be the avengers flying ship

[@kumarashispati2633]

Helicarrier

[@cmshottie62]

@jason lu your kidding right? And I never said they lived in it

[@brianfoster1504]

Fun idea, but it is not feasible.

[@Alex-ff1mk]

@@cmshottie62 sorry this is bit late but avengers don't have helicarriers but shield has them

[@the_beanzer]

maybe just ad 400 jet engines to the bodom the lift off

[@brycereveling2091]

Why do people say biggest ever built my man? Like do frogs build bigger ones tf?

[@pinetree1616]

Haha

[@arya31ful]

Because no women ever make ship that big

[@katieell4084]

Well, there are 8 other planets in this solar system alone, each teeming with advanced civilizations. You can't assume the viewer knows you're talking about Earth.

[@bucktoothbill5334]

@@katieell4084 what? There is no evidence of alien life.

[@katieell4084]

@@bucktoothbill5334 I can't tell if you didn't get my joke or if you're bantering.

[@pieman8937]

Japan’s kamakize pilot: Write that down!Write that down!

[@chrisdugas1226]

First step to not getting your most expensive and powerful ship sunk : *DON'T CALL IT UNSINKABLE!*

[@hrthrhs]

Yeah call it "totes sinkable the worst ship ever lol". THEN it will be unstoppable

[@mhelbz_1017]

it is psychological

[@nasimulnadim5269]

Lol. It's a challenge to the world. (A stupid one).

[@landrydorf9249]

It’s like the titanic all over again

[@calebmetix]

A small Nuke anywhere near the fleet and the entire fleet sinks. Any submarine within the concussion ring pops like a grape. Missile boats are the future. Or better yet, stop getting into wars.

[@bjornours7656]

You just need a swedish submarin .

[@ab6789]

I saw that video 😂😂 😂

[@Username-jc1ut]

Dammit... the one weakness of the United States Navy.

[@savage7882]

@@Username-jc1ut vikings...

[@Username-jc1ut]

Piroclanidis no I am commenting on how during a practice drill/mock battle a Swedish submarine had “sunk” a us aircraft carrier.

[@LosLS2]

as I understand it, that was a few years back and we bought one of those subs or leased one . Pretty sure that's been figured out and been virtually sunk 100's of times.

[@VfletchS]

WTF is a phalnax turret. It's "Phalanx", and CIWS stands for Close In Weapons System.

[@carterchell4817]

Sea Pig cheezwizzz

[@hobog]

I love when CIWS engages in a battle in "the expanse"

[@mariusj34]

Wow..

[@kevinroark4346]

Hobo G agreed theyre awesome brrrt.

[@codybaker4719]

The ability of the crew to perform effective damage control is a factor you neglected to consider. Every Sailor is a Damage Controlman. Even if a small boat attack successfully damaged the ship, the crew would likely seal off the all water tight doors, and shore the hull as best as possible. Thus, preventing the sinking for the ship.

[@lenaoxton3999]

*[Enemies of the U.S. hastily adding this to their Watch Later playlist]*

[@bethwilliams3148]

As if what he's saying is "classified". It's not. The enemy (whomever that maybe) already knows how it might be done - it's just having the cash, commitment, forces n technology to do it.. that takes out about 90% of possible threats.. n nothing is 100%. The Swedish diesel sub for example, can pre-emptively strike but with enough firepower in one hit? I'm not so sure - the carrier has many layers of redundancy to ameliorate against 2-3 good hits. It probably wouldn't sink, n then that sub would have to make it home.. unlikely, but possible.

[@neontendou6826]

@@bethwilliams3148 he was making a joke rofl

[@chooyongming110]

...and their allies

[@bruhji1566]

the answer is... NEIN!!

[@GlowingSpamraam]

@@bethwilliams3148 6 nuclear torpedoes are not enough premtive firepower Even 6 modern torpedoes should cripple her beyond repair once that's over 6 more to secure the kill

[@Ahad_Faisal]

North Korea is watching this

[@sampletext8076]

hmmm humblÈ lmao

[@leogjolaj7394]

Lol

[@pandac7190]

they disliked on multiple accounts

[@theotherguy6951]

Well that doesn't matter since U.S. carriers are unsinkable to North Korea.

[@theotherguy6951]

But I'm talking about NK specifically

[@-recommended1289]

*Bermuda Triangle-* *“Hold my beer!”*

[@dennisreilly5671]

copy paste

[@Horizion]

Yambarr US loool

[@Tom-mn3is]

Yambarr US, hilarious.

[@rbrick3685]

You know the US Navy uses the Triangle... right?

[@PROJECTDARKPHOENIX]

why was this on my recommended lol

[@FlightlessPilot]

I welded on this ship for 3 yrs.. pretty awesome seeing it all come together.

[@Kelekky]

Swedish sub that sunk an american carrier in war games: *Hold my beer* every US carrier: why do i hear boss music

[@barackobama0101]

Craig 75 did they? Do you think that you could give some sources? I’m just curious:)

[@barackobama0101]

Craig 75 ok thanks

[@mykincadult-store1219]

Sunk in war games, so they can counter it in real life scenarios. And yes of course if a major war broke out, we'd likely loose it. Propaganda, from both sides

[@Jdalio5]

You do know that was for pretend

[@dundonrl]

During that same wargame, the ship I was on the USS Momsen DDG-92 "sunk" the HSwMS Gotlund before it was able to hit the USS Abraham Lincoln..

[@Selona1983]

"She's made of iron sir. I assure you she can, and she will" -- Thomas Andrews Titanic designer. Brilliant line

[@MrRescue100]

"Its Unsinkable" Iceberg: This is gonna be fun... again!

[@kenneth9452]

Such a lack of imagination... NO crew on an air craft carrier would be stupid enough to sail a multi billion dollar ship into an ice berg

[@marsyad6002]

@@kenneth9452 r/woooosh

[@laffey.chan_]

Aircraft carrier are icebreakers

[@zettour.]

@@laffey.chan_ literally lmak

[@MrRescue100]

@@kenneth9452 Norwegian navy think nobody can be stupid enough to sail a multi million state of the art frigate against an oil tanker and guess what...

[@CxDubxU]

There's a reason we made space force. That's where the new "aircraft carriers" will be. Imagine being able to project power to 2-3 regions at a time using a single spacecraft. That will be what's coming. We won't know it's there

[@jeremydyar7566]

Lol that's not going to happen anytime soon if ever.

[@CxDubxU]

@@jeremydyar7566 I'm glad you know how to predict the future. Who's gonna win the super bowl next year?

[@yequalsemexplusbee4322]

@@jeremydyar7566 in 2552 it will happen.

[@AntiJihadi]

Japan be like -" We got Godzilla" Is your Aircraft carrier 'Nuclear radiation breath proof'?

[@nicolasnewcomb8514]

Japan isnt either

[@pakratmiz4487]

Nicolas Newcomb fun fact: most carriers are nuclear powered so instead of Japan isn’t either, it should be “Japan isn’t”

[@commiccannon592]

Yes

[@ethangarland5737]

Of course it is what kind of fools do you think we are besides we took care of Godzilla years ago he’s currently in chains being studied

[@AntiJihadi]

@@ethangarland5737 Do u understand the word 'Joke'??? Ya that was what my comment was supposed to be....

[@ludvigask6027]

I mean, we Swedes did come with a diesel stirling electric powers sub and sank it in War games. Just saying

[@Averagestoner]

But it wasn’t a Ford class carrier :)

[@ludvigask6027]

@El Draque Don't bully us. Or actually we are insane. I mean on big holidays, for example christmas, we eat rotten fish sooo

[@se7en136]

El Draque where did u get those stats

[@Thedrek]

Norwegians did the same in an earlier war game, however the sub did not get away undetected, you did ;) Also there has been rumored that a conning tower of a russian sub appeared alongside a Nimitz-class and dissapeared again, this also was undetected until it surfaced.

[@orbitalpotato9940]

@@Averagestoner close enough

[@aperson9641]

Examples of unsinkable ships of history: Titanic: Hits some ice, sinks Bismarck: Gets overwhelmed, sinks USS Gerald Ford: ...

[@spec-opsmexican4119]

hms hood:one shotted by Bismarck

[@Michael-bc3es]

US gerald Ford, taken out with 30drones bought off wish fitted with home made c4

[@nzk86384]

You forgot the Hood

[@NicknameIsGarfield]

USS GERALD R FORD:Bermuda Triangle..... Probably

[@bambangsudirman6063]

Well at least it took a while for the bismarck to sink even under constant fire

[@christopherg2347]

There are a number of ways to sink them. The issue is that they follow the Pegniun Motto: "Never swim alone!"

[@ColombianCaliph]

*Putin watches vid* Putin: ...huh

[@keepsmiling5937]

How does he Wathes a video?

[@Nick-mu1wp]

@@keepsmiling5937 Jesus Christ xD

[@HGAMING-ve6cw]

Derpy Assassin ‘wathes’

[@buffazzkangroo]

@Bernie Sanders russia is better

[@oktaviowibisono8379]

Who the hell need an aircraftcarrier if the US have military base everywhere on earth

[@joshmartinez7888]

Summary of the video: You can sink it but it's really hard to do it

[@JB-bm1to]

And here's how to do it 😂

[@bq68972]

Yes it can but i will not create a video of it. Its a secrete

[@xplicitmike]

Just launch 50 DF-26 missiles at her at once and at least one will land.

[@RichARock]

@@bq68972 stop acting like you know private information you're like 8 years old

[@bq68972]

@@RichARock you are idiot to believed on any videos here

[@lucaszelaya710]

Hi I’m from Russia intelligence agency thank for information. Definitely subscribed.

[@louisetim21]

😂😂😂😂👎

[@ashc4167]

Lucas’s Junkyard loooool

[@childofnewlight]

It's all publicly available unclassified info. Good to know Russian intelligence is only able to research via KZbin.

[@benhayunga7886]

@childofnewlight r/WHOOOOOSH!

[@babbintandukar9959]

Lmao

[@richardgreen1383]

As to the comment that in 2006 a Chinese sub surfaced in the midst of a task force, and then states the that the task force did not know the sub was there. Just because the public statements said they did not know it was there because they were not actively looking for it, does not mean that they weren't looking. They are always looking. The sub was not considered hostile, so no action would have been taken, and let the other side think they got away with a PR gain. As one who flew ASW back in the late '60s, our air group had a technique that allowed us to detect and track a US Boomer. The only people we told about it was our own senior staff all the way up including the sub commands. I'm sure the subs are harder to detect these days and am equally sure detection techniques are better as well. We used to play games with our attack subs. This allow both sides to get better which is what war games are all about.

[@KevinATJumpWorks]

They always say it's unsinkable. Until it does sink.

[@Bacteriophagebs]

None of this analysis touched on what happens if the carrier gets hit. That's the crucial part of how sinkable a ship is. In war, nothing goes perfectly. A carrier WILL get hit if attacked enough. How thick is its armor above and below the waterline? How good is its comparmentalization to minimize fires or flooding? How well-protected are the ship's magazines? Apparently none of this matters, because the Ford-class carriers exist in a world of perfect military efficiency and can never be hit by anything, ever.

[@bellmaster4088]

Bacteriophagebs I think it was made to stop most projectiles, but US vehicles usally have very good armor

[@thealmightyuntensil2368]

That's what I though this was gonna be about lol, they didn't cover any of the important stuff lol

[@ICY-HURR]

Eric Brown this channel never does. I’m American a

[@salyerbrandon]

Hopefully we never have to find out.

[@amnoahwielwabbit3837]

Beware of Stealth Oil Tankers and Commercial Shipping as USS Fitzgerald and John McCain found out to their Chagrin ! Chagrin = annoyance, distress, having failed, or been humiliated. Nowt but factual! Firing the REM launchers (as shown) firing “into the sky” when the attacking Cruise missiles are flying low defies logic !

[@danielduncan6806]

Man has never made anything that cannot be destroyed. So, short story, yes, it can definitely be sunk.

[@grizzlyrants37]

Daniel Duncan no it can’t be sunk by any ship or aircraft

[@danielduncan6806]

Hahahaha! HAHAHAHAHAHA! Perhaps you did not comprehend what I said. Maybe you do not know what "anything" means. Man has never made anything that cannot be destroyed, that is literal "anything", by the way. Do not fall into that stupid false sense of security. *NEVER* underestimate an opponent, *NEVER* . The fact that you think it cannot be sunk means that you don't really understand how weapons work. In a time of war a weapon will b e created to do exactly that, even if such a weapon does not exist today. Hell, they could just nuke it with that low flying missile they just showed off, or one of a similar design. One direct hit with a nuke and it is going to the depths, that is a guarantee. I know, you said; "no it can’t be sunk by any ship or aircraft", that is a cop-out and I won't let you get away with taking the easy way out.

[@grizzlyrants37]

Daniel Duncan ok buddy where talking about today. And nothing can sink it that’s not a nuke and they would nuke it as it could result in America nuking other stuff like bases. And your proving my point because you couldn’t state anything besides a nuke. And your forgetting cyber warfare and spies. You think the US won’t know if an attack is coming

[@benhayunga7886]

The ocean is vast. No matter how big your fleet is, it can never be everywhere in the ocean at once. Sinking this ship would be easy. If a chinese ship popped up in the middle of a military drill without being detected, then saying "Yeah but in war" is a completely nonsense excuse. During many military war games, there ships are active as if they were "in war" swedish ships constantly sunk this carrier with no reprecussions, to the point that America leased the swedish subs to try and find ways to counter it. So yes, even today it can be destroyed. We can currently make water based drones. Water based kamikaze drones could totally sink this this ship easily. It really is becoming obsolete.

[@irfan123100]

It can be sunk but it would be really hard since carrier are usually always escorted by destroyers or cruisers. And they probably already know the enemy is coming from miles aways before even arriving.

[@raywhitehead730]

One good fire set by a crew member.

[@IsaacHoweiner]

People: Our ship is unsinkable! The ocean: Is that a challenge?

[@kashiramgautam1182]

I will not ruin the balance I am a man of culture And also *NICE*

[@buehae1091]

Godzilla and kong: yea right

[@scifidino5022]

Build the ship like 4 kilometers high. That way even when it "sinks" it's top will stay over water. Here, an unsinkable ship.

[@e.s.6275]

@@scifidino5022 if you sail near Philippines, which is not impossible during a conflict with China, you'll need to build like a 10km ship, to make it truly unsinkable.

[@SUPERDRAGONE1969]

you unlocked the titanic ending 13 ending remain to be discovered

[@MrAcerulez]

Even if a missile gets through the defensive screen, a carrier is designed to take significant damage before sinking. Hell purposely sinking a carrier is a chore in of itself.

[@MrGHOHLS]

You don't have to sink it just take out its landing deck then its just a normal boat

[@romu_umu4681]

Gustav Hohls if you can get near it. Carriers aren’t alone they’re always in a carrier group or fleet. They also have AA weapons so i doubt anythings getting close to them

[@MrGHOHLS]

bastion missiles

[@tylerreynolds4781]

@@HNreport 13 years ago

[@MrFlatage]

@tyler, 2015 RIMPAC a French 30+ ye old Saphir sinks the 2 escort subs, the theodore and 7 surface ships undetected remember? US carriers got sunk since they were built back then same as now. What is your argument? US carriers become invulnerable over time?

[@appa609]

Everyone: anything can be sunk Imma throw some styrofoam in the ocean and you guys have fun with that

[@calebyan7975]

Bill Kong better yet, throw it in the Dead Sea

[@UrMom-do3kw]

U gotta throw a volleyball in there

[@layyouin6860]

Ur Mom throw Wilson to the sharks.

[@dabunnyrabbit2620]

a little heat and away it goes.

[@Hecor._.]

Bill Kong Underrated

[@MrExade]

Didn't Sweden in a war game with the US sink the aircraftcarrier ? all that was needed was 1 submarine, it went past the whole battlegroup undetected

[@TheHset]

Was thinking about the same thing.

[@janwillem2656]

Yeah some country's claimed they did.. of course US is denying.. I think it's not possible that the major public is gonna know the truth.. but I don't think the USA is that great superpower as they claim to be. It's mostly propaganda and show off what they do..

[@johanocampo5422]

USA is a superpower lol everyone nation agrees

[@peterkotara]

It was a Swedish Gotland class submarine on lease to the U.S Navy. She managed to sink the USS Ronald Reagan in battle simulations.

[@MrExade]

@@peterkotara lease? you mean americans faced americans in swedish submarine? (Confused)

[@brucelee5576]

The problem with attacking a carrier fleet is the US has 11 carrier strike groups and 3-4 of them are always ready to go pay you back.

[@joelb-c3v]

That was kind of my thought. It seems like if anyone actually managed to do it, their next thought would have to be “Oh, f**k, what did we just do?!?”

[@crazyking8139]

If it sinks It would be a good movie 🎥

[@chintamanigaikwad3505]

SAVAGE

[@AliHussain-wv4qv]

Agreed

[@Cangr1]

Starring Leonardo Di Caprio and Kate Winslet.

[@sssbznzn]

Lol with sex scenes

[@jackromani6996]

Swedish submarine: "hold my öl"

[@mailbox3982]

YA

[@darkice4546]

Germans did that too. Submarines are veery scary

[@zoom5024]

@@ollepol4491 it was this one.

[@derricklanders1205]

@@ollepol4491 It didn't sink anything...and it was during a war game. In a real war those subs are running for their lives from US Hunter-Killer subs (and that's IF they make it out of port).

[@moomar930]

Hold my what?

[@cupojuice6755]

unsinkable? *It's titanic all over again*

[@MR_POPSICLES]

Well i mean they really are building a second titanic. But with the way the world is now days it just sounds like a deathtrap if you get what i mean haha.

[@johnephraimhimala7718]

The titanic was unsinkable if used properly. You don't send a ship on a voyage with an uncontrolled fire burning in it for 10 days.

[@El_Presidente_5337]

@@johnephraimhimala7718 Wait wtf!?

[@oshsquash4896]

a nuclear powered carrier has targets in the north?

[@danieldeak9141]

Yea someone should put a bomb on it that has the word "Iceberg" engraved onto it. that would be batshit hilarious.

[@Andrecio64]

Short Answer: táctical nukes or a battleship like Yamato.

[@joezuzolo9785]

If it floats, you can sink it.

[@Outland9000]

"if it bleeds, we can kill it"

[@lazy808ewabeach]

Not foam man, not foam.

[@dougiequick1]

Bathtub 101

[@dougiequick1]

Loose Lips....the KEY

[@bruhballs45]

Oil can’t sink cooking oil

[@MicroToastX]

E

[@MicroToastX]

5 likes am famous

[@ciaranjamiesonfamily-frien5144]

Pixel Doge just mess with radar system

[@nealdew71]

You got 7 likes now friend you now a Boss👍

[@MicroToastX]

:)

[@daddyzyro6568]

14 now u a celebrity nice

[@CuriosityCulture]

My tax dollar is too powerful for this boat to sink...So JOKES ON YOU.

[@randomalien7746]

@Ken Ivler why do you ask obvious questions?

[@randomalien7746]

@Ken Ivler lmao

[@AR-qo4zz]

@Ken Ivler he's not Arab he's Indian....

[@abhisingh1836]

@Ken Ivler he is indian who thinks he is an American.

[@adriandecu6846]

I will use the dark force of the euro... To sink it ... XDXDXD.

[@craig4867]

EMP Blast from a nuclear weapon would completely blind an aircraft carrier and it's battle group!

[@Holocaustica]

Phalanx CIWS “FALNAX!?”

[@jhonnicdao2188]

USS Ford: I'm unsinkable RMS Titanic: Join me to the bottom of the ocean

[@RealBelisariusCawl]

The purpose of a carrier being to project air superiority in the form of, effectively, a mobile airbase means that they will never truly become outmoded for as long as navies remain a thing. Threats to the carrier are real and present, but countermeasures are always possible. I don't see carriers going away any time soon, personally.

[@dadthelad]

Yep, even if new tech like manoeuvrable supersonic missiles prove to be a serious threat, the defensive capability against them won't be far behind. Offence vs defence is a constant race.

[@bradgaines5091]

Carriers won't go away until ships start flying. And probably not even then.

[@vanessauosukainen7631]

They should downsize them tho. Sink one carrier and there goes many airplanes etc. Make them carry less planes etc and more mobile so if one is sinked it aint that bad. Thats just my opinion tho not a fact feel free to disagree

[@speechless1887]

@@bradgaines5091 nah even if ships fly in the future, a carrier might be able too just like in the avengers

[@markwheeler202]

All you need to do is put a few holes in the flight deck and the carrier is out of the battle, headed for home for repairs (if it's lucky). And repair yards for ships that size are few and far between.

[@colinjames7569]

She is 100,000 tons of love and peace. Like a warm blanket. To protect our future generation. She was purposely built to defend. And when required, she can attack. Showing no mercy to her enemies

[@changchang2395]

uss gerald: im the strongest on the sea iceberg:am i a joke to you

[@stanisse]

Chang Chang if there was a ice berg it would get destroyed by the carrier battle group

[@Aa-zp5kn]

They could litterally break any iceberg in half...some submarines even break through the artic ice when they surcface.

[@danishkfd]

@@Aa-zp5kn its not like that bro subs are different than ships. It would cause damage to the carrier but not enough to sink it

[@lorenzschiller2002]

No ship is unsinkable...you can always nuke it

[@odhunt5242]

Did you watch the video?

[@FlatDonut]

Use a large enough warhead, the emp should do it's work with the battlegroup, then fire some more for good measure

[@egz3637]

LMAO PPL OR we can just have a good spy, boom ez sink lol

[@lorenzschiller2002]

@Jay Reno it only has to come 2 miles near it

[@communistoof3014]

Lol dumb idea if u nuke the ocean it can cause larger tsunami

[@williambeasley9928]

Some say the Gerald Ford is unsinkable /iceberg has joined the game

[@jlotarod5959]

Maybe 30 years ago, sinking an aircraft carrier with an iceberg are you insane. It sinkable maybe with missile attacked or natural desaster.

[@croustibat2764]

@@jlotarod5959 wooosh

[@pyronuggets]

@@croustibat2764 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@Kelekky]

VirginiaSaltFishing Swedish boi with a sterling engine: Hold my beer

[@seanfactors9285]

@@Kelekky u realise USA has around 19 of these ships

[@vannakchan]

when a ship is called unsinkable later then the ship sink

[@kantarii3563]

The price tag has sunk more ships than anything, long before they’re even built.

[@larrybragg4194]

The US has the cash to build tons of them lol while other countries wouldn't be able to afford them:D

[@adrianmagnus3355]

At $13b a piece our $700b+ would be able to order over 50 in one year if our entire military budget was spent on supercarriers

[@jokuvitunjuutalaine430]

Bismarck: "𝗛𝗼𝗹𝗱 𝗺𝗲𝗶𝗻 𝗯𝗲𝗲𝗿"

[@chillaxo9863]

*Halt mein Bier

[@nicholaskoenig1089]

Cloth biplanes have entered the chat

[@jokuvitunjuutalaine430]

Nicholas Koenig i kind of ment the bismarcks guns but uhm oof says the bismarck

[@matthewashley5500]

Thank you

[@mclovin3568]

Yes

[@watermirror]

Supercarriers: "I'm invincible" Railguns: "looking forward to your EM shield"

[@matthewgumabon7498]

Aircraft carriers are not like battleships. They are not meant to engage directly in combat. They are basically just mobile airbases. Carriers always travel in strike groups consisting of destroyers, cruisers, subs and other smaller vessels that surround the carrier. These escorts are responsible for naval attack and defense. The carrier is just the ride for the aircraft cover and acts as the strike group’s command center. As long as aircraft are essential in naval warfare, large carriers that can deploy and maintain a powerful air presence anywhere in the world will always be necessary.

[@Ray-tf2ps]

Why is everyone dropping some wise “any ship can be sunken” statement

[@aadhithanu9070]

Because it can be

[@AustinBryant718]

Cause in a recent war game it was “sunk” by one singular small Swedish submarine.

[@memoofjacoboarbenzjuanarev9724]

Kus FACX BRO.

[@jimbojones9665]

@@AustinBryant718 I believe you are referring to the Teddy Roosevelt and most of it's task force being sunk by the French submarine Saphir .

[@hansvonmannschaft9062]

@@jimbojones9665 No Jimbo, he's right, I'd give you a link if I had time. It didn't damage the carrier's convoy, but did sink the Nimitz-class participating in the exercise, and yes, it was an old, amazingly quiet, Swedish sub. If, however, a similar thing occurred during another excercise, with said French sub doing that, then I'll look it up, because it sounds like a really interesting article to read/video to watch. Cheers sir.

[@themightyone8076]

Just drop a couple vietnamese rice farmers and you're good also isn't there that swedish sub that sank an american carrier in war games

[@themightyone8076]

@hu1a121 but of course

[@ThatGuySaucy]

As an actual Vietnamese I approve of this message

[@themightyone8076]

yes thot hunter you must hunt down this thot ship lol

[@fisophia1734]

yes frend we also can send indo ninja assasin for supported.but we want half from ships treasure.

[@themightyone8076]

@@fisophia1734 lol they'll have rice katanas

[@jacobwesterberg2054]

Maybye a Swedish diesel sub, its quite effective against USS R. Regan

[@300_spartansoldier5]

Oh yeah then Sweden won't exist anymore

[@Anton-tg3yt]

Thats true, but many countries buy them. It's not just Sweden who has them. (I think)

[@jasperlangedijk]

No Name the Netherlands have them 2

[@PSG1JOHN1]

same range as attacking speed boats, short range coastal sub... They need to park somewhere and hope the carrier group will move over them, then after that they have to deal with the anti torpedo torpedo, that the ship carry. After a torpedo is fired and the Ford goes full speed that a 30-1hour chase before the torpedo can hit the carrier , while the ford fires anti torpedo at the torpedoes, and in turn the sub is dead by firing, the only real chance for the sub is a nuclear torpedoes.. and that WW3... Guided at best range Torpedo go at 64mph Ford can go 40+ mph.....The old JFK carrier was built for speed was thought to go 57mph when it overloaded it engines for top speed, no clue on how long it can keep that speed... Oh ya anti torpedo where not on 1990s USS R Regan... during that time, they started installing them in 2010, by 2035 all US combat navy ship will have them... The race between technology defense and offense continues.

[@12345678981010]

No Name na the swedish subs are filled with swedish sub tech. altough they are only good in smal oceans like the baltic witch is why we made them.

[@rr.in.the.cosmos]

"EVERY DEFENCE HAS A BREAK & EVERY ATTACK HAS AN ANSWER" this cycle has proven itself true all throughout the history of mankind. so, never call yourself invincible.

[@Knebebelmeyer]

only a dry piece of wood is "unsinkable"

[@Aryan-my5hd]

Ok then stap a bomb on the dry pc of wood and you got a unsinkable warship

[@Knebebelmeyer]

@@Aryan-my5hd u dont understand this! it is exactly how i said , a dry peace of wood cant sink. think again about it!!! its not a joke or just sayings... cut a peace of wood in the mid and u get 2 pieces of swimming woods! cut your Carrier in the middle and nothing swims! its like an iceberg.....it cant drown,cause the physics! every"thing" what build by people can sink if it get enough damage. this is the reason why i said this!

[@michaelt9443]

Toni Decker ice

[@Knebebelmeyer]

@@michaelt9443 right...this is the other "piece" or "Thing" that even dont sunk....but only under 32degrees F..... there are some other materials, built my human, that even dont sink but this doesnt matter! you understand what i said

[@pierrepellerin249]

a simple nail gun would make it sink as the nails would eventually add enough weight to sink the piece of wood. Everything has it's weakness...

[@moparlovr5862]

Sharks with frekin laser beams attached to their heads can sink it lol.. dr.evil...Austin powers lol

[@sloppymcslops954]

This is the worst thing I've ever read. It made my head itch

[@alexbriscoe2879]

sloppy mcslops lol?

[@deez2554]

ITS EZ TO MAKE IT SINK A AROMR NUKE

[@stewie1237]

Please spare us and *Dont comment ever again*

[@omegaproskills]

U mean Fortnite gliders?

[@rockybalboa9450]

Posejdon torpedo: hold my beer. tactical nuke: hold my beer. VA-111 Shkval:hold my beer. Iceberg:hold my beer.

[@Kelekky]

Rocky Balboa Swedish sub: *Hold my Beer*

[@bulllea]

Kinzhal , Zircon can break it in half .

[@jeremypintsize7606]

Voley of 4 exocet : hold my wine

[@iliadnetfear2586]

While many after action reports and modern historians will tell you otherwise, the US Navy was NOT out to sink the Yamato. It was a 1 day ceasefire in which America was helping test the Yamato's submarine capabilities. The test continue to be inconclusive, as it has yet to surface.

[@sunnydaze429]

Fake news

[@caydencayuga7876]

Answer: The USS Jimmy Carter.

[@DrogoBaggins987]

Good one.

[@scarecrow108productions7]

Basically...an extended version of Seawolf class SSN. That's why.

[@wiggonilsson7258]

One swedish sub.

[@martijnb5887]

A Dutch or Candadian will do too.

[@a0flj0]

@Jay Jay People's cunning, training and experience will always make some difference. But technology does matter. The Gottland subs were specifically developed to be undetectable under water. You can't prevent being attacked by something you don't know is attacking you. With modern ammunition, it only takes one well placed hit to sink a ship. Even if it's a Ford class carrier.

[@8r58r5]

@@guldprillan9662 from dutch lol

[@soupgaming4762]

Bet ur from sweden

[@Jklopoppcorn]

@Jay Jay Yeah because the u.s. wasnt looking for subs. The guy said this in the video. During wartime, it wuld be impossible to get within range when atively looking for submarines.

[@tysondennis1016]

I’ve got an idea for an anti-ship weapon: Lies on the seafloor, absorbing and pressurizing gases. Sinks ships via either remote control or some sort of sonar to trigger it, and when triggered, it rapidly releases the gases, reducing the density of the water and making any ship sink to its doom.

[@cringyhuman3210]

Well sea mines are already a thing

[@Phoenix-oq2bu]

This is a good idea, however it would need to be massive in order to sink a ship the size of a aircraft carrier

[@rickysmyth]

Just fly a toy drone around the deck. That will ground all the aircraft

[@fannymontregal8331]

Phalanx CIWS: HOLD MY BULLETS

[@dovisdambrauskas6840]

But if that drone crashed into the engines of the ship, then the ship would explode

[@fannymontregal8331]

@@dovisdambrauskas6840 where are the engines again? Also even if where crashed and cause fire to the deck of course navies are skilled on outting fires and stopping flood in the middle of the operation.

[@stanleybrown6993]

nice

[@tylerrozboril6979]

actually... all the aircraft would be scrambled.

[@TrillBill]

The Kraken: "Hold my legs"

[@1copperfly]

Nice !!

[@michealnguyen1105]

That means it won't be able to move

[@pratima8580]

Which one is that??

[@Epiczcomment]

*tentacles

[@danishkfd]

*Tentacles

[@brayden2295]

I haven’t seen the Yamato in real life, but I truly hope that the picture at 0:40 isn’t to scale :)

[@manigopal92]

I have seen the replica built by japan in honour of the Yamato. And the replica itself almost made me faint. I can't even imagine the sheer size of the real Yamato.

[@pyronuggets]

Close...

[@implodingbaby]

Yeah that looks about right

[@willymueller3278]

13 billions for one aircraft carrier, two billions for one stealth bomber and I have 20 bucks left for the rest of the month. 😂

[@williammoore5277]

Well, obviously you'd better make do with the ships and aircraft you currently own

[@icyscarf6857]

People : It’s unsinkable Tall Tsunami : Hold my water

[@evanyoung2919]

I think that tsunami is gonna need that water!😂

[@kellyr95]

*Titanic: Unsinkable.* *North Atlantic: Hold my iceberg.*

[@brianfoster7064]

Tsunami in deep water are just big swells. They don't rise up until the get into shallow water.

[@joesmith389]

Tsunamis are not dangerous out at sea. Read up on wave physics.

[@3dwrecker_4660]

I believe you are talking about rogue waves

[@mmullym]

"We're invincible!" - Every losing military ever.

[@pawsteps6053]

Idc if this is a joke or not, what are you going for with this?

[@midget_spinner8449]

America has been winning for 100 years bruh

[@mmullym]

@@pawsteps6053 It's pretty straight forward. did you misread invincible as invisible?

[@mmullym]

@@midget_spinner8449 That\s debatable but even if that were true nothing last forever bro all things must end

[@Barefoot433]

Not exactly true.

[@oslonorway547]

I know .... An accusation of # MeToo.

[@JRPGGUY]

Oslo MGTOW lol

[@bogustoast22none25]

Drop a nuke while you at it.

[@RedLeader327]

Well played.

[@woooweee]

Steven Williams said like someone who assaulted a woman, in fact I have an anonymous witness who knows exactly what you did.

[@antimatter31]

@@2headedtasman200 All hail to the chief! Bitch!

[@spacecatboy2962]

chinese ships might be alright as long as they dont say MADE IN CHINA

[@uptowndunker6346]

Lol

[@spacecatboy2962]

@@yuxiang9599 isnt the chinese carrier a boat they bought from russia or india and redid it

[@the_ultra_robot6884]

@@yuxiang9599 it's a joke