Fun fact about the Gustave RR gun. Its shells were so powerful they had to be numbered and each shell had to be slightly larger than the last because each shell would measurably increase the bore of the gun.
@johnballs13525 жыл бұрын
That's fascinating
@chaowingchinghongfingshong31094 жыл бұрын
Wasnt that the Paris Geschütz from WWI?
@battleoid24114 жыл бұрын
@@chaowingchinghongfingshong3109 no the Gustav had that issue, not sure on the Paris gun
@chaowingchinghongfingshong31094 жыл бұрын
@@battleoid2411 Well, I guess both had that issue with that calibre ^^
@chaowingchinghongfingshong31094 жыл бұрын
@Mike B Well, caliber is AE and calibre is BE, but since Im german, I switch between them a lot, Its "Kaliber" in german actually, closer to the AE spelling
@davidwhite1474 жыл бұрын
3:08 To put the effective thickness of the Maus’ armour into proper perspective the battleship Bismarck’s main belt armour was 320mm thick.
@totallyaploy18244 жыл бұрын
Holy shit
@schretlenaugustijn23914 жыл бұрын
Who is stronger:A ship named after the absolute madman who united what now is one of the strongest countries in the world. Or: a fat mouse
@militarymist11996 жыл бұрын
9:26 O panzer of the lake, what is your wisdom today? Don't try to drive tanks underwater.
@Bird_Dog004 жыл бұрын
Not ennough likes.
@flare97575 жыл бұрын
The “Shwim Panzer”, a Panzer that can go “shwimming”.
@Inaho4524 жыл бұрын
Actually it's Schwimmpanzer
@TheDoof04124 жыл бұрын
Just like the "schwimmwagen"
@wingshad0w009825 жыл бұрын
“Mobility and speed is something all generals wanted for their tanks” >just finished talking about the maus
@ThomasFarquhar22 жыл бұрын
Mustache man wasn't a general and to be honest whenever the generals were talking to him they probably just assumed their head would turn into 40,000 head pieces if they spoke bad of his wonder weapons
@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigs7 жыл бұрын
Feel free to suggest tanks that you think should be in the top 10. Top 10 Weird WW2 Tanks - Part 1 ► kzbin.info/www/bejne/Y4iTk2iwZ7qifKs Wood Powered Tanks? Lost Technology ► kzbin.info/www/bejne/aZLTn62Ei62ngsk For people that want to complain about my speech, i know it not to good. One thing that i can say is that my "TH" sound like "F" because of a way of saying words called Th-fronting. The way i say Thunder sound like Funder and Three sound like Free. Have a read of this if you want en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Th-fronting
@rays50737 жыл бұрын
There's nothing wrong with you, don't let some complaints stop you from doing what you like. Also, are there still vehicles left for part 3?
@dylanc76307 жыл бұрын
The Iron Armenian aka G.I. Haigs it's fine isn't it the Armenian accent ?
@leohoad16947 жыл бұрын
The Iron Armenian can you talk about the ww1 Russian 'Tsar' tank (if you could even call it a tank). Really I just can't be bothered to do research myself...
@leohoad16947 жыл бұрын
Oh and can you also mention the Antonov A-40 please
@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigs7 жыл бұрын
+Ray S well i did all ten slots + bonus. I can always do a new list :P
@DuckSwagington7 жыл бұрын
We need the T.O.G. 2 in war thunder.
@nicolasrouvreau83657 жыл бұрын
it would be an nice target for any plane / tank with enough punch
@DrRussian7 жыл бұрын
Target? You mean runway.
@no00ob7 жыл бұрын
DuckSwagington start Playing wot there is tog 2
@der_sebbl7 жыл бұрын
But WoT sucks
@no00ob7 жыл бұрын
der sebbl i know bro but just told
@animalmother87306 жыл бұрын
The British tanks we're slow at reversing since the ONLY time a British tanker goes in reverse is when parking.
@kieronwheeler30875 жыл бұрын
Or when aiming the gun.
@theragingrussian58955 жыл бұрын
The Only Gear The Beautiful British Tanks Have Is The Tea Maker! Our Tanks Are So Good They Don’t NEED To Move!
@ancientwarrior34825 жыл бұрын
SS M0NKEY or when they are cornered in Dunkirk. British tanks were horrible until the late parts of the war, Firefly wasn't possible without USA
@dayaautum69834 жыл бұрын
Of course British tanks never went in reverse, no one trusted them to back up with anything that big.
@okrajoe6 жыл бұрын
Hold my panzer, I'm going diving
@rewrew8976 жыл бұрын
(PANZERLIED INTENSIFIES)
@flare97575 жыл бұрын
Britain would be happy to.
@FeldwebelWolfenstool5 жыл бұрын
Italy had some very high-tech tanks, for that time. They had one which featured a 5-speed transmission. One speed forward, Four for reverse. Their armor was easy to identify on the battlefield. They were the only ones that had back-up lights...
@busletic4 жыл бұрын
7:37 Hmm. It looks like Batman's Tumbler.
@hgknetwork72286 жыл бұрын
You forgot the British Churchill Gun Carrier its very weird
@walterholt97175 жыл бұрын
also maybe churchill flam thrower?
@breemy22424 жыл бұрын
Its pretty much driving armored can that can defend itself
@hofnaerrchen7 жыл бұрын
My grandfather was part of the attack on Sevastopol and he told me that - apart from the obvious effects - the blast wave of the massive rounds did kill soldiers without external signs when they later found them still in their defensive positions.
@smoraptor7 жыл бұрын
The plural of Maus is actually Mäuse
@CallanElliott5 жыл бұрын
How do you pronounce that?
@calebcook29385 жыл бұрын
Who cares any one could google that like you
@ANDZUkk15 жыл бұрын
I thought it was mice
@Sturmovik19465 жыл бұрын
@@CallanElliott mouse = mouse Mäuse ≈ Maoise or better yet, press play here: translate.google.com/#view=home&op=translate&sl=en&tl=de&text=mice%20and%0Amouse
@Eule1535 жыл бұрын
@@ANDZUkk1 German and English has some difference
@randallreed90486 жыл бұрын
Delightful series. You clearly know your stuff and your droll humor makes your videos irresistible. Thank you.
@sekritdokumint93267 жыл бұрын
Top 1 Tanks Part 11
@nibel-k14336 жыл бұрын
Hahahahahahh, Blyat, i cannot belive it XD
@calebcook29385 жыл бұрын
Ok
@airraid96145 жыл бұрын
Insert woman looking at equation with confused look meme here
@anthrazite7 жыл бұрын
Ayy the "Karl"-Gerät, probably the cutest self propelled gun ever made
@evanv74205 жыл бұрын
Motherland's Amazing Underpowered Sausage Maus :)
@mbr57427 жыл бұрын
The Maus actually was the second produced Porsche Design with hybrid engine. The Ferdinand/Elefant used it as well
@MilesStratton7 жыл бұрын
good to see my information was put to good use. excellent video iron!
@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigs7 жыл бұрын
Cheers for helping :D
@samgeorge47987 жыл бұрын
the tog 2 needs to be added to warthunder
@saltboi63747 жыл бұрын
depending on the tier, i would like/dislike
@franklind.roosevelt43677 жыл бұрын
Salt's KZbin Channel I think a fair place for it to be in the tech tree would probably be about tier 3 br 4.3 that seems fair to me
@jadrankaledinski96467 жыл бұрын
Sam George considering the gun,the crew and the tank itself,i think it could pe put at 4.7 or 5.0 comfortably
@linkxsc7 жыл бұрын
With sponsons?
@explodingcreeper18957 жыл бұрын
Landkreuzer p1000 Ratte as premium 😂
@BEAR-lw6mh7 жыл бұрын
14:52 the damn shell bounced XD
@techpriest89657 жыл бұрын
Underwater tank seems to rock some pretty cool inventions and workarounds. But holy shit navigating underwater blind is guaranteed suicide. Good video tho.
@jwenting6 жыл бұрын
they'd have a compass and I guess some way to detect drift due to currents. Would be tricky, but can be done.
@Enderfire025 жыл бұрын
Like submarines
@matthiuskoenig33785 жыл бұрын
they were actually used to the bug river in 1941
@dayaautum69834 жыл бұрын
I think the snorkels would be the downfall of such an idea. A couple of fast ships with a chain between them would leave the tanks helpless at the bottom of the English Channel. A feat I am certain the British Navy could have pulled off rather easily. it's not like the channel wasn't being watched to notice all those snorkels and bubbles working their way across either, let alone the reconnaissance planes noticing the tanks gathering in France.
@deutschlandistda27855 жыл бұрын
0:23 that is literally the design of Angry connor In WOTB
@pigtasticpigtures78255 жыл бұрын
Gherkin Traktor That’s because that’s what that’s based on. In fact, that’s what it is but with a different name.
@f4fphantomii4685 жыл бұрын
That's because what's it based on you idiot. It's not like wot invented WW2 Tank combat.
@rek1reki4 жыл бұрын
Gherkin Traktor its the archer
@brianartillery7 жыл бұрын
I love your picture of the M-10 'Achilles'. I don't know if you noticed, but it's driving over a Churchill 'ARK', possibly an 'ARK II', with the asymmetrical side rails. A photo I've never seen before. Thanks.
@absentmindedprof6 жыл бұрын
Another odd German tank was the Cricket. With an open topless turret, the Cricket didn't appear that odd. That is until you noticed the cranes on either side of the turret. These were used to remove the turret assembly so it could be placed in a premade fixed position for use as an armored fixed defense point.
@BlackHearthguard6 жыл бұрын
I worked with Bob Semple's grandson, nice bloke, quite proud of his family's history too.
@cansasandmikecooley98706 жыл бұрын
Hi there! I'm a new subscriber and I love love love WW I and WW II history. Your videos on weird and lesser known vehicles and weapons are some of the best I have EVER seen - and as a war history nerd, I've seen alot! Absolutely amazing work! I'd like to see your opinion of Top 5 or 10 spy/clandestine weapons if you haven't already done one. Great channel keep it up!
@yukkurispee17734 жыл бұрын
To be fair, the only way the diving panzer could be useful was only if the Luftwaffe were to drop bombs carrying a ton of water onto the battlefield, enough to make the allied tanks under water and then send in the diving panzers
@Markyroson7 жыл бұрын
"Which is why I don't think the tank took off" You are seriously cracking me up now 😂
@Inaho4524 жыл бұрын
The tauchpanzer now sealed with flextape...
@darthstanley1664 жыл бұрын
Put Hitler in place of the pitch man!
@nicholaslapadat51957 жыл бұрын
The scofield looked like the batmobile
@no00ob7 жыл бұрын
Nicholas Lapadat lol
@Eule1535 жыл бұрын
Heh
@darthstanley1664 жыл бұрын
From the front it REALLY does! My mind went to the scene driving inside! Good eye!
@kieronwheeler30875 жыл бұрын
It's actually quite surprising that the TOG II didn't enter production, Britain still used infantry support tanks, such as the Churchill, and the Matilda, both of which were very slow, right through to the end of the war. The TOG had heavier armour than the Churchill, and a better gun, as the 17pdr was never mounted successfully to a Churchill, and the drive system was not really any less reliable than the over-stressed system in the Churchill, also hull sponsons would be a great way to add extra firepower, both for anti-infantry and anti-emplacement combat, as well as for defence. The lack of suspension wasn't really a huge problem, due to the speed of the tank, and the Luftwaffe would not have had the air superiority to effectively target the TOG. And the TOG had the ability to cross the anti-tank ditches that were used across Europe and Africa, whilst also being capable of climbing up steep inclines, and having the firepower to effectively fight against heavy German vehicles such as the Tiger, Jagdpanther, and Jagdtiger.
@mbr57427 жыл бұрын
Tauchpanzer was used in 41 to cross the river Bug. They used a fixes air intake pipe there. That technology was used in the early Panther and even post WW2 (Sowjet battletanks, german KaJaPa and Jaguar, tested on the Marder IFV) And diving using a different system is part of the Leopard 1 and 2 tanks and trained
@shuriksvoboda68835 жыл бұрын
You could've mentioned among those, for example, such vehicle as NI-1, "Na ispug". Their, probably, main weapon was horrible noise they made while moving! Their armour was layered of ship steel and wood, and as for guns - whatever was available, often thickened with additional steel for psychological effect.
@billwilson3609 Жыл бұрын
The US M6 heavy tank had a few models made using an electric drive for testing purposes. Ordnance continued researching electric drives in the T20 series that were to replace the M4 and had a good number of electric T23's produced for testing. The Army and tankers were liked how the electric drives allowed tanks to reach the same speeds in forward and reverse. That project was cancelled due to electric drives requiring repairs too often and difficulties with the speed controller caused by shocks and vibrations.
@samiraperi4677 жыл бұрын
That NZ tank reminds me of Batman's Tumbler. :D
@Fei_PL4 жыл бұрын
14:50 - AMAZING RECORD - JUST LOVE IT!
@markrowland13663 жыл бұрын
Sponsors appeared on the Lee/Grant, tank, deployed by Britten in North Africa, during WW2. The TOG shown has, like early Churchill's, a large callibre gun in the forward right of the hull, the removal of which gave stowage space for more 17 pound shells and formerly, space for crocodile and other gear.
@maxfredriksen3504 жыл бұрын
Background song used: Panzerlied
@maddox01106 жыл бұрын
The Kubinka museum has a information board that tells visitors that the Maus is hidden behind the Karl Gerate. And it is needed, especialy now the german hangar is getting fairly empty. Most machines moved to the Patriot Park museum.
@charleshutchinson38295 жыл бұрын
The Modified Sherman T-31 and Another I can't seem to find a picture of Online. A Sherman Flame tank, bit had 2 long barrels in the turret. Seen it at Aberdeen Proving Grounds in the 70s.
@poyo35827 жыл бұрын
hey thanks for the big red circle because I definitely couldn't see the fucking 300 mm gun
@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigs7 жыл бұрын
+Misael Chavez well there is your promblem is 600mm. I guess the red circle was needed ^^
@poyo35827 жыл бұрын
The Iron Armenian aka G.I. Haigs wow didn't see that thanks
@yagdtigercommander5 жыл бұрын
I also read that some Karls had 54cm guns but were later variants. Though the calibers were a little smaller the barrels were longer for higher muzzle velocity and would work long side their older 600mm brethren lol.
@Citydell7 жыл бұрын
Nice video Armenian. Keep it up. Love these videos. :)
@freaktemple Жыл бұрын
I have heard that in the Kubinka tank museum in Moscow , hold the biggest German tank collection from the WW2 , a few thousand vehicles , it would need days to see them all . Including the mouse , the Thor , and the German kugelpanzer
@samrussell40657 жыл бұрын
The realy sad thing about the Archer is the ignorance surrounding it: not least, most people seem to think the gun faces forward. It was highly effective in its role, continuing in British use into the '50's, long after the Firefly was phased out. The ability to make your escape from an ambush or stalk at full speed is not to be underestimated, and it was far harder to see an Archer than any other contempiary apart from the Hetzer (15mm difference in height)
@zombieaerospace50054 жыл бұрын
10:00 Panzer of the lake
@gagemullis81347 жыл бұрын
the archer tank destroyer was for defending the rear end of a concoy,
@jasonbarnes97817 жыл бұрын
Gage Mullis lol. very good.
@gearz25706 жыл бұрын
Gage Mullis good idea
@TheAgProv4 жыл бұрын
not bad, but error at 2:11: that's not a Valentine. It's the earlier A9, which shared the same chassis and wheelbase. as it was a multi-turreted tank, it might be worth your while finding out more about this - in the 1930's there was a fad for tanks with multiple turrets.
@baloghmarton30655 жыл бұрын
I don't want to be a jerk or anything, but I think, that the Maus was not the only tank, what's development was ended by bombing. The hungarian Tas-project was also stopped by bombing of the Weiss Manfred factory, the developer concern in the Summer of 1944. The project's aim was to create a tank to counter the T-34. It ended up very similar to the german Panther. Anyways a great video, keep up the good work!
@wickwire95604 жыл бұрын
It may have been mentioned already but ... that Artillery Piece that's circled is more of a Mortar Vehicle !
@mr.unknown66324 жыл бұрын
14:26 Song is called Wenn die soldaten
@swigsty65833 жыл бұрын
Hitler: HOW ARE THE TRAITORS TELLING WHERE MY UBOATS ARE?! People: haha stolen underwater tank
@zakMedia5 жыл бұрын
Ty very much I rlly wouldn’t have seen that giant gun without the red circle on the thumbnail
@eddherring49726 жыл бұрын
Tank derivatives include Brummbar, Sturmteiger, Heuschrecke and Percy Hobart’s Funnies which include the floating Shermans, the Sherman Crab mine clearer, the Bobbin beach assault tank, Armoured Ramp Carrier Churchill and Churchill Crocodile and many others. Also if you are including Maus in this video you should include the T95 motor gun carriage reclassified as T28 it was the allied version of the Maus though it ‘only’ had a 105mm gun. Two were built and like Maus they never saw service however the T28 was superseded by better designs. One was destroyed by engine fire the other is on display in America.
@Emtbtoday4 жыл бұрын
That panzer 4s rear wheel going down the hill looks ready to exit the tank there! Haha
@iDrive4fun936 жыл бұрын
In part 1 I got an Impeach Trump ad and in part 2 I got a Build the Wall ad 😂😂😂
@defondel44105 жыл бұрын
Lol I can just imagine on a British destroyer Sonar Man:SIR WE HAVE A PROBLEM MIGHT WANT TO COME SEE THIS! Commander: yes? Sonar Man: I hear hundreds of engines! Commander: wth? Crewman: Sir over here! Quick! Commander: the Germans have tank submarines... (looking at beach) LAUNCH THE DEPTH CHARGES! Underwater tank crewmen: NANI?!!!
@cheese60396 жыл бұрын
4:17 in the video, there's a hammer and sickle on the maus
@brandonsarsland-brunner33905 жыл бұрын
7:10 I looks like the batmobile from the Batman begins and the dark night
@sentinel76727 жыл бұрын
I like that the model of the bonus tank you showed firing (I have no clue what to look for or how to spell it) had "Thor" on the side.
@mete_envy19237 жыл бұрын
IST called Kärl-Gerat
@MostlyPennyCat5 жыл бұрын
Is this music from The Grand Budapest Hotel?
@Otokichi7863 жыл бұрын
5. Archer (Valentine chassis, fixed, facing backward 17 Pounder/76.2mm AT gun.) 4. Maus/PzKpfw VIII (188 tons, 300mm armor, 128mm main gun, 75mm coaxial cannon, MG34, Diesel/electric motors.) 3. Schofield (2 Pounder/40mm cannon, track+wheel drive system.) 2. Tauchpanzer/Underwassen tank (Panzer III/IV chassis, water tight to 15 meters/20 minutes.) 1. TOG-2 Tank (80 tons, 114mm armor, World War I-type, infantry support, 57-76.2mm gun, 14Km/hour, Diesel/electric motors.) Bonus tank: Karl-Gerat (124 tons, SPG, 600mm Mortar, 1 round/10 minutes, 10Km/hour.)
@Hunt3rK3nw4y6 жыл бұрын
To be honest, the TOG 2 is basically an over sized Churchill Mark VII tank with just pretty much longer body, 17 pounder gun and so on.
@tomihaili87565 жыл бұрын
Late Karl had 54cm gun which was longer than the old 60cm. Both were in use and were interchangeable.
@billieonare7 жыл бұрын
About bloody time m8
@Markyroson7 жыл бұрын
Can't resist, sorry. I'd tell you a tog joke, but it's too long. The landshark The beached whale You name it, we've come up with it in world of tanks.
@Catequil7 жыл бұрын
the porshe tiger is similair to the mous, engine wise. but that one was worse since 1: it dug into the eartch, 2: it overheated the engine, 3: the electric motor catched fire
@Allegro74697 жыл бұрын
What about the German Heuschrecke with the removable turret? I don't think it ever saw battle but it was developed.
@praveenkumarkudroli26293 жыл бұрын
Karl , gustav , ladikarpanzer , ratte , Tiger 1 , king tiger , panther ,KV6 ,KV 44
@ye38266 жыл бұрын
0:58, did you hear about the new french MBT? it has 14 gears, 2 go forwards in case the enemy attacks from behind XD
@Dr_Wu4 жыл бұрын
Nah backwards
@TyphoonBlast7 жыл бұрын
Hey, can ya do a vid on the Gustav? I am really interested in that cannon
@hughmungus17437 жыл бұрын
Change your avatars
@bigmanjaffers7 жыл бұрын
I'm not affiliated with the fandom, but can do what he wants, okay?
@Emtbtoday4 жыл бұрын
Not quite a quick retreat for the Archer! Just it was to damb long n heavy to have it facing forward the tank would nose dive as soon as it went over anything they were quite bothered about it overturning thqys what it says in my British tank book on British tanks in Normandy it was just a bonus it was able to retreat quickly haha but mainly built because it was far to long for any chassis facing forward
@jackandersen12627 жыл бұрын
The Kugelpanzer, although from it's design it looks like it would be a recon vehicle.
@nightowl57137 жыл бұрын
Random fact about the maus and Karl, the tanks were so big the building was built around them both
@Cristieagle7 жыл бұрын
7:38 I think I know where the Batmobile got its deisgn from.
@natenjohnson7 жыл бұрын
oh, something else. what the hell is the hammer and sickle for? I could barely see it in that picture, but from aerial photography?
@justinbonz7 жыл бұрын
took long enough to get part 2 out. lets try and pick up the pace if you do a 2 part series again please
@gonun697 жыл бұрын
12:23 -"Number one, the T.O.G. II" - Tank with T.O.G. I written on it in the background XP anyways, cool video!
@MegaRazorback7 жыл бұрын
The TOG II is basically the TOG I with some minor changes and that footage was showing off both the TOG I and the modified TOG II at he same time as they were both being tested on the same day i believe.
@MegaRazorback7 жыл бұрын
And yet the hull, tracks and armor stayed exactly the same...not much of a redesign if all they did was change the engine and suspension.
@thracianTV7 жыл бұрын
There was also a Tauchpanzer IV (which you show briefly) and a Panzer Befelswagegen III Tauchpanzer -400 Panzer 38(t) Ausf. A mit Schwimmkörper, Panzer II Schwimmpanzers, Panzer III Tauchpanzers, Panzer III Befehlswagen Tauchpanzers, and Panzer IV Tauchpanzers were built/converted. They were to be used for the invasion of Britain but instead they were used to cross rivers in Russia. For some other weird tanks try the German versions of the AVRE: the Pz I/II Ladungsleger (which could lay explosive charges by using an arm that stretched over the vehicle), the Borward B II remote controlled mine-exploder, the Landwasserschlepper (not really a tank but the later version looks a bit like a Pz IV) and the Infanterie Sturmsteg auf PzKpfw IV (a Pz IV that used fire ladders to create a 56m long infantry assault bridge).
@ancientwarrior34825 жыл бұрын
Everyone gangsta until the British channel starts speaking Panzer and Blitzkrieg
@thogyt7 жыл бұрын
8:08 did IKEA make that shit?
@pontusgustafsson95104 жыл бұрын
Stridsmakten now known as Försvarsmakten made the tank.
@dennisw644 жыл бұрын
I wonder if the Schofield tank was the inspiration for the Tumbler Batmobile from "Batman Begins"?
@chriscalvin50837 жыл бұрын
like the video. could you do a video on WWII light tank/tankettes like US M1 combat car and British Vicker MkII
@MrShoki446 жыл бұрын
How about the Char 2C? unlike the TOG 2 there was an attempt to use them (10) against the invading Germans in 1940
@robertfarrow42564 жыл бұрын
one of the few, not one of the only. If it's the only, there is only one.
@Real_Claudy_Focan7 жыл бұрын
NO ! NO ! NO ! sub-pens weren't useless ! they withstand TallBoys and protected very valuable U-Boten !
@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigs7 жыл бұрын
+Claudy_Focan didn't help when the allies blockade them.
@Real_Claudy_Focan7 жыл бұрын
the amount of time, money and effort put to destroy them was very valuable... U-boten were the only and last resort of Kriegsmarine (and for Germany) to make UK suffer Their BB were hiding in fjords meanwhile their sub's were operationnal (and even a poor ratio at the end of war) they kept sinking valuable merchandise and armament
@blackbirdonrx59007 жыл бұрын
Claudy_Focan U-Boote ;)
@Real_Claudy_Focan7 жыл бұрын
i'm not german, i'm belgian, you know, that little country who speaks flemish and french ;-)
@ReynardFuchsmann7 жыл бұрын
Claudy_Focan Not going to lie, I read that as Sub-Penis
@Karagianis7 жыл бұрын
So what about the T-35? And the Hobart's funnies? I'd have thought at least the Bobbin would have a spot, that's a pretty weird tank. There was one Horbart's funny called "elevatable goat"! (no joke) Also: A38 Valliant The Odesa tank (aka Tank Ni) Heuschrecke 10 (mobile artillery tank with detachable turret) The M3 Lee/Grant is pretty strange too, despite having a sizable production run.
@truegopnik65917 жыл бұрын
Correction: both maus prototypes weren't destroyed by the Germans, only one was. The second one was destroyed by the soviets when the ammunition detonated inside the tank. It was stripped out and the turret was refitted, but it was never restored.
@MarkSmith-to7xi5 жыл бұрын
You could have chose any of the many British "Hobart's funnys", mostly built on Churchill chassis
@slinq7 жыл бұрын
thumbs up for using soviet storm stock footage super thumbs up if you actually watched the series, its good to learn things not just from the victors perspective
@VerdeMorte4 жыл бұрын
Hoxton, chill, I already subscribed...
@naominekomimi7 жыл бұрын
Great video! I really love these. I do have a suggestion, though. I think when you are reading your lists off you should try to make a table of things you want to say and then come up with a way to easily move from one point to another in the script. So like instead of finishing the end of the previous bulletpoint and then saying the next one (like "Reliability - The ____ tank was very unreliable") you could say the end of the previous point and then segway with a short phrase (like "Another issue with the ____ tank was its reliability"). That sort of thing OBVIOUSLY not a major gripe, and the focus in these videos is the information and the research (Which is fantastic by the way). I just figured I'd point it out in case you hadn't thought of that. :D
@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigs7 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the consecutive feedback
@sillysad31987 жыл бұрын
+1 to that. although it is already the best "top-list" video on youtube
@isawadelapradera64906 жыл бұрын
segue not segway
@gearz25706 жыл бұрын
so thats the cylinder in the back of the maus was, not a gas tank, it was a cable holder
@justaboxofsneks28757 жыл бұрын
15:12 there was also a country named "the netherlands" they blitzkrieged through
@fishpop7 жыл бұрын
5:03 HOLY SHIT!! THAT THING IS *HUGE!!!*
@louisrorison84576 жыл бұрын
The archer is a pain in war thunder
@dirufanboy19716 жыл бұрын
Ahhh, the Bob Semple - a towering achievement of Kiwi engineering!