Bad UK Driving Vol 340

[@MrMaster2262]

I tend to wonder what a DPD interview would be like... you turn up, drive around the yard and they notice you can't drive and say "when can you start" 😂😂😂

[@user-cc2ux9ew1r]

That junction with 4 give away signs is insane. 😮

[@jaycee330]

*Laughs in American*

[@dicklessvonloser6909]

I can't fathom why they don't put a mini roundabout there

[@Oligodendrocyte139]

You treat it just like a mini roundabout except you can drive over the central portion.

[@petehiggins33]

It's a squareabout.

[@user-cc2ux9ew1r]

You can say that again !

[@BlokeOnAMotorbike]

your car at the end is a 1937 Standard Flying Ten. Bonnie & Clyde were killed in a 1934 Ford Model 40B Fordor Deluxe V8 that they had stolen in 1934.

[@mikebarber1480]

Google search has a picture at a show and says it's a Standard 9

[@paulhoad1131]

Who has the right-of-way at 4 way stop in the UK? At four-way intersections with stop signs for all drivers, vehicles should proceed in the order of first to arrive, first to proceed. If you come to a four-way at the same time as another vehicle or vehicles, yield to any vehicle on your right.

[@shm5547]

We don't have 4-way stop junctions in the UK. Certainly, there are no 'order' rules like there are in the US. Although technically, if there are give way lines, the first vehicle over the line gains priority, just the same as a mini-roundabout really. Unmarked junctions are even worse!... Rule 146 Adapt your driving to the appropriate type and condition of road you are on. In particular in side roads and country lanes look out for unmarked junctions where nobody has priority.

[@scienceexperimentsforhomee261]

@paulhoad1131 or there is another way to look at it and think that no one car ever has right of way over another and that you proceed when it is safe and that you will not cause a collision. That is also the approach by the Highway Code in the preamble to the general rules before rule 103.

[@paulhoad1131]

@@shm5547 we do have them in the uk as i have seen at test one of them

[@shm5547]

@@paulhoad1131 where?

[@dougtaylor2333]

The 4 way junction without any indication is unusual but when I was learning to drive 60 years ago my instructor advised me that at any junction with blind spots you should make use of reflections in shop windows to check blind spots for traffic. Certainly more difficult these days with so many shops having shutters but worth remembering

[@TheWeepingDalek]

at the clip with the traffic lights you turned right with. i feel that one is different because you have you right turn box instead of waiting in the lane to turn right. so you wouldn't have been in his way for long and the road markings do say that he can go straight there. it's a use all road space sinario

[@JaapVanderHorst]

Agree, I see no wrong there and no aggresiveness, more like an opinion.

[@janetwilliamson6403]

I quite agree. To say he should have moved off slowly is childish. The idea is to get more cars through the junction so the lights can change a bit quicker.

[@sushiginger444]

Absolutely. Did nothing wrong. If he got held up by traffic turning right, that’s his own fault, but he didn’t so it turned out he was right to take the right hand lane.

[@jamielee-hill449]

Looks like the trees down your way are more mobile than the England players. What a pile of shit it's been.

[@ianlove1215]

The guy that got behind you at the lights. I’ll agree with you that 95% of the time he’s being a numpty, but if he’s second in line & the road layout is how it is there he is assuming you are going into the box to turn right so he can pass you that way. Anyone further back in “your” lane that wants to go straight is a numpty, especially if there are other cars turning right behind you.

[@MadderstheFox]

100% of the time he is being perfectly sensible to use that lane in that circumstance. He would only be obstructed by idiots that cant use the right turn correctly or would knowingly pull off really slowly to unnecessarily prove a point in which they are wrong about.

[@stephencope7178]

At 8:50, I could hear your indicator sounding in good time. The mitsubishi, I believe it was, should have known better. Conversely, I've seen people giving the impression that they are going straight ahead, only to then put on their indicator as the lights change. . .most infuriating!!

[@jacobdavis9548]

The junction with the 4 give way signs is simple. It works like a Mini Roundabout, But not a Mini Roundabout. You stop, Look and continue if safe, And the other 3 lanes would have to give way to you. If you am going straight and the other car Infront is going straight, You both can go straight and the two at the left and right would have to give way. Hard to explain, But simple in my head.

[@Baldieman1]

I have an inkling the car @2.23 is a Lagonda,due to the shape of the grille badge,although at first I thought it was an Alvis,so what do I know!

[@steamhammer2k]

The only thing worse than a bike in front and that is a bunch of bikes in front that are determined to stay as a bunch. 🚲

[@scienceexperimentsforhomee261]

@steamhammer2k but don't you realise that if that bunch was single , it would be at least twice as long and therefore much more difficult to overtake?

[@barrymurton8988]

That junction almost looks as if they forgot to paint in the mini roundabout in the centre square!

[@lordchippers]

7:26 "Always an Aldi" dammit, Lidl...

[@toxlaximus3297]

She could smell your batteries burning, that's how she knew.

[@georgeday5901]

I live in gt bookham ,some people call it a squareabout, most people travelling along lower road think they have right of way.coming down the highstreet you have to be very carefull when you cross the croossroads because of cars from your left.

[@zaar2604]

I drove through the Mad Mile and That Roundabout today. I was anticipating action but was utterly disappointed.

[@michellesimpson4364]

08:24 looks like the chitty chitty bang bang car

[@stephencope7178]

At 5:28, these road markings are ambiguous. One road should be marked as giving priority!! 😳

[@jjharson7344]

@2:21 - it really looks like a 1934 Alvis Speed 20 SC Vanden Plas Tourer, or another similar Alvis, the bonnet ornament and the bar across the grille is the give away, I might be wrong, but I do think this is one type of Alvis or another?

[@kungfutuber]

5:00 I believe these junctions are treated like mini roundabouts (just without the markings) where those who arrive first directly opposite you and to your right, are given priority. Like all junctions however, these should still be approached with caution but especially due to the limited visibility as you pointed out. This could be the reason a roundabout doesn't exist here due to the blind spots and opportunists. Doesn't stop the driver at 6:00 taking a chance though...

[@jugglerjim01]

3:51 you'd be surprised how much tyre noise carries.

[@kungfutuber]

2:20 From what I can tell, this seems to be a Lagonda 2 Litre Speed Model (high chassis). 21:00 That's just your standard car. A 1937 Standard Flying Nine to be precise 😅 Research tells me the Bonnie & Clyde car was a Ford Model 40 B Fordor Deluxe V-8 but it does look similar from the front.

[@noviceangler8084]

An old way of seeing who has priority at a junction , ( 4.40 ), is to look at camber of road. If your camber goes across junction and other sides right n left are against yours, then you are on primary road across junction and they give way to you. I was taught this for when snow falls and road markings covered. Look at curve of snow coverage on junction and see which direction it links up to. If against your camber then other road has priority and you give way.

[@AndrewWhite-fu7bn]

Good idea, but have we got the time? what with Mr honker honking for you to get an effin move on!

[@sunnybnk]

The grey car at the end was a 1937 Standard with a 1057cc petrol engine. As for Plod at 18:14 they have so much crap on their Joe 90 "utility" belts, they can hardly move their arms to turn the wheel. Hence the very many point turn.

[@jaffabeast]

I would have thought a 4 way give way would be first come first served and if you arrive at the same time then give way to the right

[@grahamlong6870]

This reminds me of a law that (used to be? ) in Kansas USA, and that was If two trains approach one another at a crossing, they must both stop, and neither was allowed to start up again until the other had gone.

[@jimwhippet3697]

That 4 way junction will never work in the UK, especially in the London area. I spent a couple of years in South Africa (a long time ago) and 4 Way Stops were common. They were just like that junction and worked very well.

[@fatsmandela]

12:45 , we don't drive on the left , I've always believed we drive on WHAT'S left

[@scienceexperimentsforhomee261]

My dad always said that there is no modern traffic law that says you MUST drive on the left. All it says in the Highway Code is 'keep to the left'!

[@melissanewton7462]

😂Too many parked vehicles.

[@user-cc2ux9ew1r]

Greetings from Casablanca Morocco to my beloved nation, the Brits ❤

[@JonPriston-ds9ec]

What's the weather like!? I'm going in 4 weeks!

[@suziforester]

Hello friend❤

[@user-cc2ux9ew1r]

Scorching hot mate ! I hope you are going to Agadir and not Marrakech.

[@user-cc2ux9ew1r]

O'right luv? Good to hear from you again. 🤗🤗🤗

[@JonPriston-ds9ec]

@@user-cc2ux9ew1r yep Agadir 👍🏻

[@Dhoggy]

If a mini roundabout is less expensive than traffic light how cheap is a squareabout?

[@nigelscott4325]

Have they changed the advice in the HC on walking in the road? I've been in Wales and the vast majority seem to walk with the traffic coming from behind them rather than walking towards the traffic. Then they expect you to walk around them when they meet people that do know what you are supposed to do.

[@daviemac9925]

The 4 way give-way, is supposed to be a calming measure usually where it's not practical to stick a roundabout, mind they'd ignore that too! I like the live drives, although I usually pick them up later on.

[@scottvessey915]

4:15 Should be the order that you arrive I would think, same as a 4-way stop junction in many countries.

[@gerhard6105]

5:56, we Dutch would have taken the signs away. We have the rule: right goes first. So at 5:56 the car coming from the right has priority. With the cyclists it went okay: you went right and they went right. We have many of such crossings. Because it has all the same signs, they and the white striping can be taken away. Less maintenance costs.

[@shm5547]

8:00 the highway code says you 'should not' overtake across a junction, or use the hatched area, but the give way markings are a 'must'. However, there was no issue, speeds and distances were ok.

[@neiloflongbeck5705]

Due to the restricted sight line to the right, that second approach you made to the 4 way give way should be a stop

[@iallso1]

Here in NZ we occasionally get 4 way Stop signs, (I haven't seen it with Give Way, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist), and general rule is straight ahead traffic has priority over right turning traffic. If vehicles coming from opposing directions both want to enter the same road the left turner goes before the right turn, and you wouldn't turn left or right pulling in front of a vehicle going straight ahead.

[@dallasfrost1996]

I haven't seen any 4 way Stop or Give Way intersections (except for roundabouts) here in New Zealand. Our small uncontrolled 4 way intersections usually have Stop or Give Way signs on 2 (opposing) sides while the 2 remaining sides are treated as the priority road.

[@iallso1]

@@dallasfrost1996 the one that readily springs to mind is in Riccarton, at the intersection of Rata and Remu streets.

[@dallasfrost1996]

@@iallso1 Very interesting. I personally can't say I've ever seen one myself, I know they're very popular in the United States though.

[@TheMatlockBiker]

Those 3 or 4 give way junctions are quite common in Ireland

[@suziforester]

7:45 Dangerous overtake. Dangerous driver.

[@karim1387]

Why wouldn't they put a roundabout there?

[@bustersw1760]

The 4 way junction at Bookham is a pain. I`ve been through it a few times, and I always treat it as a first arriving is first to go. Unfortunately, and it`s usually some posh Surrey senorita in a 4X4 barge, who thinks as they have a big motor with an equally big ego who goes anyway. I`ve met these junctions in America and it`s always first there has right of way. And God help you if you get it wrong.

[@ado543]

A 4-way give way is actually unlawful - the law clearly says that you can't have give ways on all sides of a junction. A mini roundabout would be better. As for who has priority, I would treat it as an unmarked junction and just negotiate with the other drivers on a case-by-case basis - don't assume there are any rules (because there aren't any).

[@scienceexperimentsforhomee261]

@ado543 I agree with you there. The preamble to rules 103-158 says no motorist has the right of way over another and you should basically always proceed cautiously.

[@malgf4145]

8.52 To be fair, you were turning right and if the car behind going straight on had stayed behind you, you should move over to the right turn lane so leaving him room to continue straight on. I don't think the 2nd car, the Mitsubishi, did anything wrong.

[@Auntie_Trev]

I'm looking forward to the live drive Tony 😊

[@milsteadonmovies]

Weird junction really needs a mini roundabout so it makes sense. I’d give way to the right as a rule. As for the guy who went through on the mini roundabout, he did apologise as he probably didn’t see you & I agree that an apology alleviates a situation. Mistakes happen. As long as there’s no issue, fair enough

[@russellmorley2290]

Great stuff as always stu some really nice motors an the van is a ford thames love an respect ❤

[@samhenwood5746]

Thanks The London Dash Cam 🚕😊👍

[@ianmason.]

I wonder if the 4 way give way with the squareabout in the middle is an experiment? They're quite rare but you will find road layouts set up as an experiment to see if they work. Most disappear after a couple of years never to be seen again, but some go on to be the norm. One of the places that advance stop lines for bikes was tried as an experiment was on the Uxbridge Road between Hayes and Hillingdon - those obviously were counted a success. The experimental ones in Hayes were for bicycles _and_ solo motorcycles, the latter having been dropped form the design that was rolled out. Not that the 20 minuters on scooters seem to have realised this.

[@smilerbob]

Watching this video later than most so apologies for my tardiness… 4 way give ways are an interesting one but the most important thing to remember is you are giving way to vehicles already on the carriageway. So if someone enters before you then you give way. That doesn’t mean, like some do with roundabouts, you can accelerate to be there first as that is just idiotic One other thing is that from your perspective, it is a cross junction so you should be giving way to anyone that will be crossing your path from either side One last consideration is, despite being marked, is this the same as an unmarked junction where nobody has ultimate priority? After all when traffic lights aren’t working it becomes an unmarked junction despite there being markings 🤷🏻‍♂️ Whatever the answer, it is designed to slow everyone down on approach and make everyone more aware of each other 👍

[@cliveshakespeare9184]

4-way stops are common in South Africa, and also in the USA I believe. It is quite simple to use, first come - first go. In German grid-pattern town centres you give way to the right, also simple. It just requires a bit of consideration for others, which, from watching your videos, is a rare commodity on British roads!

[@adinigel]

Ah yes! Just follow laws from another country...that's bound to work! Just imagine..."no officer, in the states / s. Africa they do such and such so that must apply to the UK too"...personally I'd rather follow what the give way lines are telling me and look for an opportunity to go when safe! Priority is given, not taken!

[@timweather3847]

I lived as a child in the fifties 200yd to the left of the give-way crossroads as you were facing it in the latter part of the clip. In my day the road going across was Lower Road, while you were coming out of Church Road and facing the High Street. Because Lower Road was continuous I would feel it to be more important and have priority while the other roads are shorter connecting roads, though it is no longer marked that way. I bet the woman that crossed in front of you thought the same.

[@PreNeanderthal]

That four-way junction has 'give way' lines and a black rectangle in the middle instead of a round white blob so obviously: It must be a Squareabout.

[@LAMF24]

4:49 Whoever arrives at the junction first should have the option to make the first move. If you come to a four-way at the same time as another vehicle or vehicles, yield to any vehicle on your right. edit: that junction needs changing

[@ablestringer9063]

I googled the four way give way situation. Its common in the US but "doesn't exist" in the UK. It might be worth contacting your local Highways department as I suspect this is an illegal set-up. Its not in the Highway Code that's for sure.

[@billyskoda6839]

Tony, thanks for highlighting the communication that us good cyclists indulge in.

[@gerhard6105]

7:49 seeing that, I would turn very slow to the right....🐌

[@paulbateman3922]

8:11 - I guess you could call that a "Lidl" mistake...

[@thelondondashcam]

😁

[@dtfhhn]

hue hue hue Ye, was in the wrong, ofc.

[@AndrewWhite-fu7bn]

@@dtfhhn Aldi other posters will agree.

[@alunrundle162]

Only you could feature a Squareabout. (And I love Lidl. Especially the middle aisle)

[@markdyson4332]

06:00 Would it not make more sense for that 4-way give way to be configured as a 4-way stop - at least then all drivers could better assess the situation. Still with you though, crazy like it is...

[@jaycee330]

Not in the UK, since Stop signs are rarely used. The solutions are 1) make it a roundabout, 2) prioritise one of the roads.

[@fredlenz4743]

4 Yields is a 4 way stop with priority to the RIGHT

[@michellesimpson4364]

10:37 I would still think it’s priority to the right otherwise it would cause a right problem if everyone thinks that they have the right to go first from all sides.

[@michellesimpson4364]

Great videos ❤

[@thomasknight1190]

The car that Bonnie and Clyde got killed in was a Ford deluxe leather seats

[@adinigel]

4 way give way junction - no one has priority!

[@alexlawrence293]

... And what about the delivery motorcycle/scooter at 09:17 ?

[@michaelgurd7477]

Re the pedestrian and knowing that Tony is behind them. Electric cars make a lot of tyre noise. When I'm cycling I can hear them behind me.

[@robinkey4499]

Always give to the right. Some junctions should have stop-sings

[@tanderson278]

at 17:40 PHONES IN CRADLES - Tony, you don't need to ask anymore, because you know the answer 😉 But for your viewers: The Law in a Nutshell: The source of these regulations is - Road Vehicles (Construction & Use) Regulations 1986 (with amendments) Regultion 110 - Handling a mobile device If you handle a mobile device at any time, even just for a moment, when the mobile device is in use, you are committing an offence, where the penalty is 6 points. Regulation 110 does prescribe any restrictions on how a mobile device maybe used when not held in the hand. But Regulation 109 does restrict what a mobile phone can be used for. Regulation 109 - Viewing Information on a Display Screen [Please see below for more details on Regulation 109] Regulation 109 restricts what a driver may view on a mobile phone. For 98% of drivers, a mobile phone fixed in a cradle, may only be used for SatNav purposes. Owners of a VW Up for example, may use the mobile phone with the VW App to view the status of the vehicle's equipment. ***************************************** Viewing a list of telephone contacts, recent calls, lists of messages, viewing music playlists, messages with a customer on the Uber App, Facetime etc. is an offence! ***************************************** Typing on Screen of a Mobile Phone As far as I am aware, there is no specific regulation banning typing on the screen, however, if a driver was considered to be distracted by this, they may be prosecuted for careless driving, or similar offence. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Full explanation of Regulation 109: Too many people, when they read the title "Television Sets", can only imagine that box that sits in the corner of a living room! A "television set" is a device that can display an image derived from a different location. "tele-" = transport from another locaton "-vision" = state of being able to see Therefore, Television set = able to see an image transported from another location. Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) - the original regulation was restricted to a CRT display only. I have been informed by the Police, due to a Court case, this regulation is now deemed to include all types of display screen. In paragraph 2 of Regulation 109, there are four criterion used to decide whether a display screen must comply with Reg. 109. A display screen need only meet with one criteria to qualify. A typical "smartphone" meets all four criteria. In paragraph 1 of Reg 109, it lists four categories of information that a driver may view on a screen. If the driver is viewing anything else, the driver is committing an offence. a) view the status of the vehicle or its equipment - [Engine running/Gear selected/Volume of fuel/Tyre pressures etc] b) view information about the road where the vehicle is located - [Road temp/Elevation/Vehicle Pitch or Roll/Depth of Water etc] c) view the vehicle's proximty cameras - [Reversing camera] d) view navigation - [SatNav] And that is it, a driver may not view anything else! Regulation 109 has impacted the Police when using an ANPR system in their Police vehicles. An emergency amendment was passed in 2020 to allow the Police to use ANPR in Police vehicles. Regultion 109 impacts all drivers.

[@ianmason.]

7:38 No question, the green felt frog overtaking at the entrance to LIDL was wrong. The chevroned area is there _precisely_ because the road planners _don't_ want people overtaking there, precisely because of the likelihood of someone turning right as you were. The only reason they won't have used _solid_ white lines there (which would make it an offence to enter the chevroned area except in an emergency or to avoid an accident) is that LIDL will undoubtedly have HGVs turning in and out that will, because of their length, need to stray into the chevroned area to make the turn. Rules 167 and 130 apply.

[@MadderstheFox]

Only they did use a solid white line, which it did drove across.

[@ianmason.]

@@MadderstheFox No, it's dashed. [Checks] Yup, 7:43, dashed.

[@ianmason.]

@@MadderstheFox No, the chevroned area is surrounded with a dashed line, that's the line in question which determines whether you can enter that area if _necessary_ or not at all. 7:43 See rule 130: "Areas of white diagonal stripes or chevrons painted on the road. These are to separate traffic lanes or to protect traffic turning right. ● If the area is bordered by a broken white line, you should not enter the area unless it is necessary and you can see that it is safe to do so. ● If the area is marked with chevrons and bordered by solid white lines you MUST NOT enter it except in an emergency."

[@MadderstheFox]

@@ianmason. Those hash markings are bound by a solid white line, which the perp crossed to exit.

[@ianmason.]

@@MadderstheFox It's the _enclosing_ lines that matter to the definition of what kind of chevroned area it is, not the terminating line. Do you really think that the intention of the road planners is that an HGV properly using the chevroned area to make a turn there is to not permit them to drive over the terminating line? They can use the rest of the box if necessary but must not drive over that _one_ line? It's moot anyway as they have not met the test of _necessity_ for permission to use a chevroned/striped area.

[@noviceangler8084]

If the clip car at 3.00 is the chitty look alike, then the original car was built by Count Louis Zborowski in the early 1920s.

[@Mooheda]

4:30 its a Squareabout ;P hahaha, Always give way to those who got there before you unlike Roundabouts where its priority to the right.

[@Debbiestrainsandtoys]

Maybe the Postwoman's Google maps mightve zoomed out after going over the bump so she's quickly zooming it back in

[@lefthandedspanner]

4:25 is effectively a roundabout without the actual markings for a roundabout - it's a very strange (and frankly stupid) way of laying out a junction, and because it's not an actual roundabout, I don't believe there are any official rules regarding its usage, probably because the original legislators never predicted that anyone would ever lay out a junction like that

[@LAMF24]

6:58 If you are a bicycle, that VW van doesn't stop.

[@billynomates4378]

My first visit to your channel, but won't be the last. Your commentary is like listening to myself with a different accent 😁😁

[@michellesimpson4364]

Tony I get moaned at for using my handbrake rather then clutch control at traffic lights or emerges. Is there such thing as over use of the handbrake? Plus I was taught to use the handbrake rather the clutch control.

[@zetectic7968]

Same here. Don't use the clutch as it causes more wear & tear.

[@johnnodge4327]

Hand brake or parking brake these days is cheaper to fix than a clutch. I was always telling the wife to use the sodding hand brake, not sit on the clutch. In fact I got so fed up with saying it, I got her an EV to use, problem solved.

[@michellesimpson4364]

@@johnnodge4327 I passed 1 yr ago maybe teachings have changed to handbrake instead of clutch.

[@ianmason.]

Ye gods no! Using the clutch to hold a vehicle in place rather than one of the braking systems is absolutely the _wrong_ thing to do. Anybody who's moaning at you for using the handbrake at traffic lights badly needs to book a refresher course with a proper driving instructor. Sure, you need good clutch control when it gets to the pulling away bit, and I hope that you don't mean that you're using the handbrake as a substitute for that, but the 'keeping still' bit is very, very definitely handbrake territory.

[@ianmason.]

@@michellesimpson4364 I passed [mumble] years ago when dinosaurs still roamed the earth and the world was in black and white - I was taught the proper use of the handbrake and would have had a proper telling off for trying to hold a car on the clutch.

[@nickjones2536]

That was a Lagonda Rapide Tony 👍

[@jjharson7344]

nope, sorry I don't believe you are correct, never seen one with red spokes, plus they only made 25, and no mid bar across the grille, like this, car, I'd hazard a guess from the blurry images, it really looks like a 1934 Alvis Speed 20 SC Vanden Plas Tourer or another similar Alvis, the bonnet ornament and the bar across the grille is definitely their style of car! it was a bit too blurry though, but I'm rarely wrong on these matters. please correct me if I am?

[@iallso1]

7:37 they were wrong to make that overtake.

[@YT_Rezy]

another great video mate

[@plebtron]

That's a proper who dares wins junction in the thumbnail

[@Batters56]

14:58 One of my favourites: thats not a mini roundabout silly! It’s got extra bricks in the surface so it’s not a mini roundabout or a roundabout.

[@Mooheda]

its a squareabout, in this case give way to those who got there before you.

[@paulcurren2151]

Surely the 4 way give way should be treated as a mini roundabout

[@ytr8989]

You can hear the tires of a car coming up behind you

[@karenwalker575]

@2.24 It's Chitty Chitty bang bang in disguise 😂 🚙

[@timweather3847]

My Lexus hybrid makes more noise running on batteries than petrol at low speeds. You don’t hear it with the windows shut, but she would have done all right.

[@Graham_Langley]

The four-way junction is in Great Bookham, Surrey, junction of Lower Road and High Street if anyone wants to have a look on Google Maps or even IRL.

[@tjampman]

10:20 DPD: Don't Please Don't

[@andreashaynes3346]

Many thanks for sharing with us Tony. Always great to see quality driving!!!!!!!! 😅😅😅

[@ernsailor9041]

I've not seen a 4 way give way so I googled it, it's first come first serve but priority goes to the right so technically that woman was ok.

[@dominicfindlay]

8:10 There should be an island there to stop people from doing that really As we know, paint doesn't work

[@rodmcleod4805]

Once again,lots of "drivers" not using their guessometers(indicators). I drive a German built Insignia.Does that mean I can change my driving habits with impunity?

[@AndrewWhite-fu7bn]

Be honest, you do that already!

[@JohnRapp-d6p]

Volume 340 Four give way lines at junction. drive up to give way lines - one yard away look for and assess other traffic. give way to dangerous vehicles and if nothing dangerous proceed. Useful if over enthouiastic motorist behind,.and cyclist coming from either side,. hazards on and allow cyclist out.

[@MrMaster2262]

The petrol head moment car two looked like an old Rolls Royce... i could be wrong!!!

[@des_smith7658]

I think it's a Bentley

[@dominicpolglase-uz9zs]

The petrol head moments are , firstly a MG and secondly , a Morgan ( possibly).

[@dominicpolglase-uz9zs]

Third car that's ancient is a no eyed dear! Scuse the pun😅

[@grahamnutt8958]

@3:59 Pedestrian is likely to be a School Teacher. They've got this ability to turn round in a millisecond to unerringly throw a piece of chalk at the misbehaving muppet....... At least; that's how it used to be in School 🤣🤣🤣. Subsequent timestamps not appended - Sorry. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 roundabout - please don't remind us about the shoddy performances. Watching my Cat take a dump is far more interesting 😅😅😅. Mrs Magoo.... nah. I agree. It doesn't sound right. Here's a possible alternative...... Olive - from On The Buses - as she couldn't see 💩 rofl. Good one as always, Tony.

[@DraftySatyr]

I'm usually laissez-faire about TV sitcoms from the 70s and 80s - it was a different era, and the humour reflected that time. But 'On The Buses' was just crass, vulgar, and unpleasant.

[@grahamnutt8958]

@@DraftySatyr No issues here. Different Generation and, for what it might be worth, I do agree that it was Misogynistic. Anna Karen - Olive - was in the long running EastEnders and at least one Carry On film to the best of my recollection. Very much under-rated but loved by the British Public. Peace ✌

[@nickjones2536]

And the one at the end was a Standard (later became Triumph) but no idea which model 😁

[@BlokeOnAMotorbike]

1937 Flying Ten

[@zetectic7968]

That old car at the end STANDARD FLYING 9 registered March 1937 & says its MOT expired July 2012 ( maybe it is exempt now)

[@paulqueripel3493]

It is exempt, anything before 1984 is.

[@Debbiestrainsandtoys]

😮 Tony we got pulled out on by a lady who almost didn't look at us

[@michaelneale7813]

2 . 20 P head moment Have a Guess A Bentley ? 2100 austine 7 ?

[@trevorberridge6079]

[3:53] As an electric car owner I know that an electric car makes road noise the same as any other car. It doesn't generate much noise apart from the sub 15mph warning sound, the motor whining under quick acceleration and the tires rolling across rougher surfaces. But it generates it nevertheless. So she very probably could have heard the car behind her OR it was just a coincidence.

[@billyskoda6839]

The tyres are louder than normal cars, so they actually make more noise

[@trevorberridge6079]

@@billyskoda6839 The tires are generally the same. In 8 years I've never fitted different tires to my EV than I did to my previous ICE. Same tires, same fitter.

[@billyskoda6839]

@@trevorberridge6079 but not the weight creating the noise, eh?

[@DavidNewmanDr]

With more weight the tyre profile changes. That might make it louder or quieter, depending on the road surface.

[@billyskoda6839]

@@DavidNewmanDr regardless, the sooner this fad for evs blows over ,the better for everyone

[@50upss]

Who has priority at 4:35 ? - Usually whoever arrives there first

[@petehiggins33]

Unless they're bigger than you.