What Minecraft 1.20 SHOULD Have Been...

[@TheMisterEpic]

So what do you think 1.20 should have focussed on? Be sure to subscribe and leave a comment! Join the discord - discord.gg/WGc9UNM

[@Epik_turtle]

Idk

[@Arvl.]

Forget the skulk/warden dimension we need an end overhaul NOW

[@sleepycieley]

optimization probably

[@Bluebird_YT]

It should have focused on updating biomes

[@WindyHiII]

The left behind update.

[@thomasalvarez6456]

The idea to have smaller updates but more frequently throughout a year could be better for the health of the game. Adding content sooner that’s ready will bring people to play Minecraft rather than delay features for over a year at a time.

[@LandonEmma]

Yeah

[@kyleyoung2464]

Its. Not. Fully. Announced.

[@justaguy2183]

I mean… they did said that. Smaller updates being minor updates will be more frequently through the year with QoL changes and additions they’re ready to ship (think of 1.4.7 or 1.16.2) being accompanied by the next big update

[@kyleyoung2464]

@@justaguy2183 1.16? Small? What?

[@Hyde_way1]

@@kyleyoung2464 1.16.2 not 1.16 i think 1.16.2 brought piglin brutes

[@hypenheimer]

8:10 It's extremely unlikely that it would've come with the rascal. Also, having loot improve with time would encourage afking in a world constantly. Maybe it could be based on advancements?

[@toxwinplayz]

love the sniffer much?

[@hypenheimer]

@@toxwinplayz none of the mobs are especially good

[@blackbomb9858]

People always makes up stuff in the mob votes

[@larno80]

@@toxwinplayz aw too salty sniffer won that you cant accept any criticism? it seems your mob is too perfect it seems

[@aaronmccullers384]

You could also tie it into distance from spawn, so say every 1000 block traveled improves the loot quality by 1% (or something actually balanced).

[@LandonEmma]

BTW, the rascal was never said to give you a backpack, so please, just vote what they tell you trust me, I made a bad decision of making up what they may do by adding the glow squid and regret voting for it.

[@ashuraomega7113]

If people still think the rascal was any good in the first place then color me disappointed.

[@tapgames3465]

Glow squid was more of mojangs fault not you

[@WhenIOmor]

@@tapgames3465 True, that hypnotize shit..

[@SamJNE122]

It seems especially ironic, given that he criticises other loot chests for giving items that become basically worthless very quickly, when there was nothing indicating that rascal loot would be different.

[@LandonEmma]

@@SamJNE122 yeah

[@reiner2240]

i think that a "quality of life update" could be good, it would include inventory, parity, and improving existing features based on feedback from the MC community...

[@lightdreamer_]

Did you mean "parity"?

[@reiner2240]

@@lightdreamer_ ya...

[@LittleMushroomGuy]

Player based chest gen would result in players not opening any chests till they reach the end game, because they would fear wasting precious items It should be so that chest that are closer to spawn have more common items compared to chests generated farther away from spawn, thus you have an extra motive to explore far away lands

[@RaphielShiraha64]

@Confusing Zark Nah can work fine if balanced right.

[@guywiththepvzpfp2630]

The most we can do is pray that the updates become more significant and have more of an impact.

[@JacobKasza]

Good pvz pfp, guy with the pvz pfp

[@pvpcraft2081]

Probably will.They just haven’t revealed much

[@____________________________a]

tbh I think they should just let the modders do the work remember 1.9?

[@ashuraomega7113]

@@____________________________a that's not a good argument at all. Most of the stuff they make will most likely never make it to the game (wether for stupid reasons or not) and even then we shouldn't be able to rely on add-ons to have a good experience with Minecraft of all things because then is it really a good game? Mojang just needs to stop being lazy.

[@hydroxide5507]

arent you glad theyre respecting trans rights thats all that matters

[@Dawott]

Another thing for Bedrock that basically no one mentions/ knows about is that when holding space bar while wearing an elytra (in creative) you will be pushed upwards. It is very hard to explain but just try it yourself, trust me.

[@valdia127]

Something that isn’t really discussed is that the smithing table has 1 use. It would be really cool if you could add other items to modify your items, as there are attributes already in the game! Or maybe using different items added in the future (like enderite?).

[@miimiiandco]

Having lots of different upgrades for Diamond tools sounds fun.

[@juiuice]

maybe modify shields with it idk

[@loljptrollergami7325]

being able to use netherite scrap to upgrade gold gear could be cool since gold has the highest enchantment possibilities

[@valdia127]

@@loljptrollergami7325 that would be super cool. Maybe it could light the person that attacks on fire for a second (for each piece of armor), so mixing and matching could be super strategic.

[@BLET_55artem55]

@@juiuice *YES*

[@NabbyLloyd]

"well uhmmm they can't do a QoL update because it doesn't add anything new" they could literally just bundle it with a few extra items. seriously, the 1.15 update was 99% bug fixes with the only mechanics being added are bees, they could definitely do it again

[@kiattim2100]

Optimize doesn't sells.

[@sagarkathuria8194]

@@kiattim2100 Read the entire comment

[@aarter2913]

People got mad at the 1.15 update. Many of then didn't even know it was optimization, they just saw bees and said "nothing else whatsoever? Lazy mojang getting worse again"

[@kiattim2100]

@@sagarkathuria8194 I did.

[@DreadCore_]

Not with the community crying about how small 1.20 is, they would hate no new content.

[@SemiHypercube]

Let's just hope they listen to the community and add features like this to 1.20 because there's only been one snapshot so far

[@aceplante]

um. thats the point. there has ONLY been one snapshot yet everyone is acting like this is the finalized version. You all got upset when they decided not to add a feature they made the mistake of showing, so now theyre showing less.

[@Spiney09]

@@aceplante their point was that this isn’t the final version of the update. “Let’s hope they add” isn’t language that says to me “this is the final version”.

[@aceplante]

@@Spiney09 And im saying you dont have to hope. Ofc they will

[@potatothedueg7684]

@@aceplante Well with the way mojang and microsoft are going i really doubt that they will listen to their community. If they did listen to their community there would be tons of change over the last few updates but that never happened.

[@Spiney09]

@@aceplante they have not listened to the community. Server owners have for years been asking them to improve the optimization of the game, myself included in that group. Plus there have been a lot of features that they promised but have not delivered, that people want still. So acting like “it’s so obvious they’ll do that” is not merited based on their past actions. If they’re not going to add the features, they should just tell us. Leading fans along for almost a half decade in some cases isn’t listening to your community at all.

[@spanishSpaniard]

I don't think judging the update now is very wise, because at the moment we don't know what the update will be. I understand many find disapointing that we don't know the plans for the update but I am sure many more things will be included in the update apart from those anounced given that all the anounced items were in the first snapshot.

[@shhinysilver1720]

Well, yea judging the update that early kind of aged like milk with the armor trims, cherry trees and ARCHEAOLOGY

[@aminatandour589]

@@shhinysilver1720 It didn’t age like milk. It aged like raw eggs outside on a blacktop on a hot summer day.

[@CraftyMasterman]

my prediction before mc live was something like the "Digs and Dunes" update. Something that would update the old biome vote desert and badlands options as well as their structures. I hoped the creative tab changes might have also indicated some inventory update (i mean they still could). And the concept of the rascal made me feel they wanted to do some extra things with the mining experience

[@BLET_55artem55]

Bamboo boat:

[@caspermadlener4191]

You do know that Mojang stated the update DOES have a theme? Just no name. Mojang also stated that they redstone is exept from full parity. Yeah, moveble hoppers would be great, but the fundamental difference between Bedrock and Java is update order, and that would be hard to implement in Bedrock, because computer stuff I don't understand (I think).

[@enn1924]

There is already mods for movable block entities on java so it is possible to implement (and apparently is not hard or so said the devs of the mod)

[@caspermadlener4191]

@@pringle409 That is not the difference. I heard that the important difference is between sending al information at a time (Bedrock) and sending the information in order (Java). This seems important for redstone. Programming languages don't REALLY matter, because they both need to be compiled. It's like the difference between mashed potato's and cooked ones. It is slightly harder for the body the digest the latter, because chewing is hard, but it doesn't really matter when it is in the stomach. It is technically possible to program "pure", but that isn't practical at al, so it is almost not used anymore.

[@caspermadlener4191]

@@enn1924 Programming is never the issue in Minecraft. Except for optimisation.

[@hyplexz2304]

@@caspermadlener4191 with major optimization comes major bugs, I should know, I play Bedrock

[@miimiiandco]

I think the Bundle is a fine item. It helps when you have a bunch of random items, like a diamond, bunch of diorite, a Golden Apple, mushrooms. I think the Bundle is fine as is.

[@jocatorejenerico]

I agree, it's pretty useful above all during exploration, when you collect a lot of "junk" that can easily fill your inventory. It's a shame that it's still not available.

[@KajtekBeary]

I would never put diamond nor golden apple inside tbh, it would make getting more of diamonds irritating more than anything because I would need to put them in the bag every single time. Apples should been in the hotbar… and for the other junk, why don’t just drop them? Honestly, more than a bundle, Mojang should add trash button

[@BobSockTwo]

I also don't get it why people hate it so much. Yes, it could be improved a little, but in early game it's pretty good. And if you don't have random items to put into the bundle, then you can just pun one item into it so it doesn't take space Sorry for bad English

[@personman5156]

Thats because the biggest thing youve ever worked on is probably a simple house. Shulkers are mobile chests, but a bundle is just a few slots, an absolute mess, and not worth the effort. Nobody taking the game serious would ever make more than maybe 1 bundle prior to the end (something people usually start with on an SMP) and then it becomes entirely useless after shulkers. So why even add it? Why spend the time or effort making a new inventory managing item if its funtionally useless to those of us with shulkers? I will never use these in my modern survival worlds. Stop defending everything mojang does.

[@patatamisteriosa]

They never said the Rascal would drop his backpack. I think it's pretty good that what happened with Glowsquid didn't repeat again, players thinking the mob would have some ability or drop it just didn't had

[@lasercraft32]

Plus if the Rascal had one it would have been another dissapointing blue mob vote mob. XD

[@TheKrzysiek]

The adaptive loot could use advancements, since they are prolly best way that the game itself has of telling how far the player has progressed.

[@garyk3943]

I honestly could care less about an end update, we spend over 95% of our time in the over world. Why not make the over world run smoother and look better. I love that they are adding new features that use old features. I do feel like bamboo farming will be very op now though.

[@MilsonDev_]

I agree, but I want an end update because it is very empty, like 99% of it just made out of one block it makes it very boring and uncomfortable exploring it or trying to find an end city you probably will visit it just once and never return back. They can do the same thing as they did with nether update, then they can continue updating the overworld, actually they update it more than anything else.

[@gabrielreid4950]

Tbh part of the reason we spent so much time in the overwolrd is because how baren of content the two other dimensions are, like mojang has added so much to the overworld already I'd prefer they would focus on adding stuff to the end and nether for a bit (ik we just had the nether update 2 years ago but it still leaves a lot to be desired compared to the overworld)

[@cjfrost1441]

You just gave a reason why we need an end update, we spend so much time in the overworld that we need more reasons to explore the other dimensions.

[@gabrielreid4950]

@@cjfrost1441 fr it's why I don't want a new dimension rn since except for certain farms the current dimensions are already barley used by players and a new one would suffer in the same way...

[@buzzaboo]

The reason you spend your time in the overworld is because they haven't updated the end 👀

[@cerebralcloud92]

8:13 Whilst yes, the Rascal could have given us Backpacks as a reward, that’s the key word: COULD. There was no guarantee that the Rascal would’ve been anything further than just an enchanted Iron Pickaxe, and that being the end of it’s functionality. It COULD have been a full on companion like a Wolf, sharing inventory and potentially assisting in Mining or Combat. But, that’s not what we saw. So, going by the logic of “What we see is what we get”, Mojang EXPLICITLY states that there is more coming alongside the Sniffer, primarily in the form of new Seeds and Plants. On a raw, objective level, the Sniffer presented more ON THE TABLE than the Rascal or Tuff Golem.

[@faiz0944]

You have to remember that so far they've only shown (and added to the snapshot) features that are 100% complete

[@j-d0g]

You have to remember that game is going to die unless they fix these issues

[@lamarr51]

Stop defending mojang it wont do anything good

[@KudosMSGP]

@@lamarr51 But that’s literally what they said? That’s your fault if you that you refuse to listen

[@lamarr51]

@@KudosMSGP ??? Learn to read maybe

[@NobleLaika]

@@lamarr51 ???

[@elcanaldelucas6187]

I heard a theory that the theme of the update is revealed by looking at Agnes' survival world, where she likes to write lore, spread clues all over the world and show it to whoever visits it. And that the update is meant to make what she calls "telling your own story" easier. Signs to mark places, bookshelves with story books, camels for the owner of the world to show it to another player, and so on. In conclusion, 1.20 is the "tell your own story" update.

[@jijigri9224]

I personally really like what they're doing with 1.20. We've already got every feature shown at Minecraft Live in a snapshot, so now every week is going to be a surprise, just like in the old times of Minecraft, and I find that pretty exciting!

[@chgeri2232]

I love how the whole point of this update is to tune down the hype, speculations and hate around the update and all we get is people hating how little the update adds to the game, as well as people speculating and getting hyped about things they haven't promised or backed out on or forgot about.

[@siduxjxhdgzhdjxhxuuxxyhgg1079]

@@chgeri2232 yeah because you dont set the bar so low that you cant possibly underdeliver, you set the bar at a relatively high place and try to overdeliver. if you guys think supporting this kinda behaviour is gonna improve anything, you are just doing what they want lmao. mojang is going to get lazier and lazier because not enough people punish them for it.

[@siduxjxhdgzhdjxhxuuxxyhgg1079]

@@adeus_sinister yeah because monetizing content will definitely get them far with shitty updates like this (not to mention how many people would straight up not even consider buying dlcs because of the worlds current economical state). so unless they want a way worse rep and gains, doubt that will be happening anytime soon. please, do come with an actual point next time though.

[@thetruetrident]

@@siduxjxhdgzhdjxhxuuxxyhgg1079 They are saying that Mojang will over-deliver on this update, surprising us with new features. They explicitly said the update wouldnt be this small at minecraft live. Besides, this is the quickest we've ever been able to test new features, so is it really bad? You want mojang to set the bar too high and then underdeliver??? You people will really never be happy.

[@cedden]

@@siduxjxhdgzhdjxhxuuxxyhgg1079 Yeah Mojang got soo lazy like look at 1.18 and half a year later 1.19. These updates were soo insignificant. Did not add any new world generation or big biomes and structures. Super lame and not thought through. Especially this deep dark thing like yeah it looks alright but the blocks neither have redstone functions nor drop xp or so its all useless superficial stuff that needs no work at all duh

[@ammanpatel8163]

I agree that there should have been an update like this. Essentially, some features of MC need to be refurbished. Player animations, entity models, textures (like how the creeper doesn't blend in anymore), loot, structures, MC's static nature, moveable tile entities, performance, animations, ambience, MC being way too easy ∴ very boring to play by yourself, etc. need to be improved. But, I think it is a good thing that Mojang isn't promising too much as that's what they did for 1.17, and maybe even 1.18 since the Deep Dark was delayed. When I watched MC Live for 1.17, I immediately knew there would be no way they could deliver. That was just too much content. I think they were running off the high of the Nether Update. Stepping back and taking a breather is okay; they care about the game and are trying to rebuild trust, and this is the way they can. Just give it time, they care, but they have their own lives, plus their morale is probably low after putting in so much time for such a 'meh' response to 1.19. I'm sure they care, they just need a break :D!

[@InventorZahran]

The Creeper texture must not be changed; it's the most iconic character in Minecraft!

[@egon3705]

@@Faizan29353 honestly if it weren't for it being iconic i'd trash the current creeper (massive progress lost/ugly hole in the ground because the game lagged or you failed to react within like 0.75 seconds of the hissing) and replace it with a new version that doesn't do block damage and camouflages better by using the dungeons texture

[@thewintersgem7341]

the milk update before i watch it

[@TheMisterEpic]

Not exactly lol...

[@Maniac_l23]

@@TheMisterEpic coward

[@thesemicolon7269]

The milk update more like the milked update

[@Dax888]

based comment

[@Pesce_sole]

How did you get the diamond sword emoji in your name?

[@docdapper]

I know this wouldn’t solve *every* inventory problem, but I think that stack sizes need to be increased. Terraria has increased their stack sizes a few times, and every time they do, organization and building gets ten times smoother. It would suck losing the classic 64 stack size, but at this point I think it could do with an increase

[@egon3705]

at the very least increase stack limits on the items that stack to 16 (except maybe ender pearls since that might be for balance reasons)

[@Gandhi_Physique]

Yes, I agree. At the very least make it a toggleable option or something in the gamerules. If you want to keep "Classic Stack Size", then turn that option on. (May have to have the world locked into that mode though, idk)

[@steamingpileofspaghetti9755]

nah, that is holy in my opinion. the 3 x 9 inventory: not holy. 64 stack size: holy

[@notme232]

@@Gandhi_Physique I can see stack size as a data pack for map makers. That way they can set the stack size of every item however they like.

[@SashaMasonVR]

I think that is also because Terraria focuses a lot more on exploration, combat and fighting bosses and waves of enemies that just require you having a whole bunch of special items on you, different weapons, different ways to move around, potions for healing ect. The amount of gear you can find in the game from exploring and also the amount of gear you have to keep on you late game to actually do well would break all bounds of what Minecraft allows you to carry. Minecraft started out as a game focuses around basic survival and building structures. It works well if you play it exactly like that, but if you want to have additional pieces of gear on you, it'll get cluttered fast and none of that is ever really much of a requirement either. So yeah maybe increasing stack sizes and inventory slots would be much helpful. Like who's gonna use potions in survival when you run out of space so fast with them?

[@mrfanpl]

Considering how you can simply just sit in a hole for 1000+ days without doing anything (unless you're playing on hard mode, then you'd have to eat), I don't think a day count for loot is exactly the best idea.

[@solarmaster9828]

Having loot chest generate better and better loot over time is probably a bad idea, since a player could just AFK in a hole for several days after generating a new world to get better loot. If it were to be added it should be based on how many loot chests a player has opened or something similar.

[@malick9549]

Maybe put some flags internally for example if the player has created a few diamond tools/armor pieces then set a flag to true and upon opening the chests the game should look for those flags so even if they don't have the stuff on them they should still get good loot.

[@siduxjxhdgzhdjxhxuuxxyhgg1079]

@@malick9549 so just do advancement checks?

[@malick9549]

@@siduxjxhdgzhdjxhxuuxxyhgg1079 that can work on java but not on BE/PE since you get advancements only once.

[@siduxjxhdgzhdjxhxuuxxyhgg1079]

@@malick9549 so just check the same requirements for advancements on bedrock without showing?

[@malick9549]

@@siduxjxhdgzhdjxhxuuxxyhgg1079 I'm sorry I don't understand your statement...

[@halex9075]

I think I say for more than myself that I would be more than happy with an update just introducing optimizations, bug fixes, and parity changes if it meant that we got pre 1.12 performance again. 1.15 was supposted to be a bug fix update but that was 5 major versions ago, we need another update like that.

[@dylanlawrence933]

In minecraft live, Agnes did say that what was announced was about 100 percent complete. This means what has been announced is only a small portion of the 1.20 update

[@Teryte]

I think in terms of structure loot, better loot should be in new or revamped harder structures

[@Dolphin002]

I feel like 1.20 would be more hyped if instead of announcing a few minor features that are basically already done, they should've at least announced one bigger feature that they know they can finish before the release.

[@aceplante]

Yea and last time they did that everyone got upset when they decided not to add it. So now theyre announcing less, becuase thats what the community wanted

[@Dolphin002]

@@aceplante But if they're absolutely certain that they can add a feature, then there's no reason not to announce it.

[@abdulmannanbabar8020]

They should've done it the same as they did with the nether update. They announced big things like new biomes and mobs while also keeping a lot of features secret like the basalt delta, netherite, piglin brute, strider, etc

[@melo-7904]

thats what they planned to do with the past 3 updates with the warden

[@nobodynobodoy2695]

@@Dolphin002 thats exactly wut they did with the new mountain generation but weren't able to deliver until 1.18. If we were never told we were getting new mountain generation before 1.17, people wouldn't have gotten so letdown. Your first comment is a perfect example of what people don't want cause Mojang doesn't know for sure for any new big features will make it into the next update. It would be technically fine if they announce what features they are planning on adding. Just don't say this will be included in 1.20 or whatever update and instead just say it'll come in the future. Even so, it would be better to keep stuff hidden in case something goes wrong and decide not to add some feature. Announcing new features basically forces them to add it at some point or else the community gets mad

[@bogopogotime1736]

hearing rascal voters say rascals would’ve added a backpack is like saying phantoms would’ve added a unique pve experience 😂 backpacks were not promised at all from rascals, and is entirely made up by the voters, long live sniffer

[@VintageMC22]

I’m pretty sure he said it could’ve not would, so he’s just hypothetical hoping it would have been the drop of it, if it won but yea I had to listen again to hear what he said

[@bintobox]

Yeah that's a very big stretch for adding an item Mojang literally said they would never add

[@ashuraomega7113]

Exactly meat riding so hard they come up with there own "confirmed knowledge" lmfao

[@spoono]

@Gaia Sure, but they could've acted as cute moving item frames (We don't really have moving item frames in the game). That's literally the only reason I voted for them.

[@rimanova5441]

I swear all sniffer fans are the same. cringe af

[@raifegeozay687]

10:10 but there also should be advancement check for that For example: there will be no loot better than current vanilla loot no matter how much days past unless you get to the nether(or some other things) otherwise, we can create a new world, afk for a looooong time in a place that mobs cant reach and get rare items in early game

[@bogopogotime1736]

9:06 end cities have enchanted diamond gear? 🤨 if it was that easy to obtain netherite armor, then it would make the game too easy and create 10x more complaints

[@Conductor01]

Netherite armor gives only knockback resistance by what I remember so its a waste of perfectly good netherite

[@miimiiandco]

I think dynamic loot is a bad idea, since it discourages the player to explore until an arbitrary time limit is hit. It could be implemented in better ways, but I still feel like it would break things if implemented badly. I'd much rather have unique loot in each structure, like Sniffer eggs and Cobwebs only spawning in Mineshafts, Skulk stuff only spawning in the Deep Dark, Allays and Totems of Undying only spawning in Mansions, and so on.

[@mow_cat]

your inventory changes are basically "more slots", which doesnt do anything to eliminate clutter, it just lets you have more of it. and most of xsiuma's ideas are just "making ur hotbar easier so u dont have to open your inventory", doesnt change the clutter or make u have to manually organize less. your structure loot idea won't work that well on servers, and it would be really strange to go to an identical structure and get way better loot later in the game.

[@thetruetrident]

exactly.

[@SashaMasonVR]

Just replace the world day count with player statistics for how long they've played for. Ez.

[@mow_cat]

@@SashaMasonVR still unfair to new players on servers loot becoming better over time doesnt make sense in general. cuz then there is also the question of "hey why did this blacksmith have 5 diamonds when my first blacksmith had only an apple?" (not verbatim, but you get the point) same amount of work, but more profits. there is no skill behind it either and you might as well just AFK in ur world

[@seandorama5932]

I finished the video and as a tldr to everything I want to or have said: The update isn’t even out yet guys give Mojang a break they been kicked in the balls 2 times in a row they’re still recovering. Im editing this as I go through the video and rn this seems kinda pointless. But I do agree Mojang should take some time to optimize the game’s code “1.20 should have been better”: It’s still brand new also they only shown stuff that they have 100% or 99% finished. “Why can’t Mojang just fix the game?”: Yes, Minecraft is backed by a billion dollar company but just because you got more people doesn’t mean its easier to do something. Also they can’t just add something and call it a day they have to test it again and again so that it adds as little bugs as possible. 4:56 : Because they only want to show and give out stuff that they have finished so they don’t have a firefly incident again. Also like I said before its still new 8:19 : Don’t talk to my child ever again… (in all seriousness tho it could and should do more like adding more crop seeds or maybe being a tool to help in an archeology update) 12:07 : This was about how many people are trying to go over 8 million blocks in Minecraft but yeah ~180k is kinda low but still not many are doing that but they it should be fixed, but also, -but still, AAAAAA WTH DO I SAYYYY!!!!

[@Re69.]

Be able to move chests, hoppers, furnaces etc with pistons > new bookshelfs

[@LloydTheZephyrian]

Hoppers are sometimes used as a transparent block that's immovable, so we'd need to have a block that fills that role. Maybe an obsidian slab?

[@winterkavinel7243]

@@LloydTheZephyrian Bedrock Edition can move those items using piston so why not in java

[@moodlethenoodle]

If yall want that shit so bad they better give up quasi-connectivity, 0-tick pulses and garunteed Redstone before they even think about changing java redstone

[@maevwat]

@@winterkavinel7243 bedrock has a different collision box system, it has its advantages but it affects modding a lot, bedrock blocks can't have custom shaped collision boxes like in java.

[@mrfanpl]

and shriekers, so I can finally summon a Warden at my base

[@ticomcchimes7107]

Why do no people understand that what they revealed was only the stuff that was pretty much finished and ready?

[@FancyDakota]

Why does everyone want massive updates in these updates now? I like small and focused ones. I don’t mind big ones but they shouldn’t happen often. My only hope for future updates is we get a working Bundle for all platforms.

[@ashuraomega7113]

The only other big update I personally want is an end update I don't really care after that oh and add some dungeons content while you're at it.

[@syuvamc2114]

I like small updates to but if they will release only one update a year they should def make it a big one, before microsoft minecraft used to have small updates but multiple updates a year even multiple a month in the alpha phase

[@EEGAR]

They haven’t announced everything yet. You guys complained that they announced too much last year and now you’re mad they didn’t tell you the full update

[@xomvoid_akaluchiru_987]

I would love to hear Xisuma and MisterEpic have a conversation. Xisuma has a lot of well thought out understanding takes, where as MisterEpic has much more passionate or emotionally charged, though still valid and certainly not uninformed, takes.

[@El_Presidente_5337]

More inventory is the equivalent of "Just one more lane bro."

[@Radar_of_the_Stars]

Well don't you feel stupid now that 1.20 is one of the best medium-sized updates we've ever gotten

[@HungryWarden]

1.20 was one of the worst updates. 1.19 was better than this bullshark update.

[@nz-muzic]

Here’s a take on the bundles: in the terrafirmacraft mod, an item called vessels exist. They act in a way similar to bundles. They have an openable gui and get around the excessive storage limit by having smaller stack sizes then the regular inventory slot. Maybe something like that could work for bundles too?

[@Tohkie]

With the tying loose ends update, yeah it might be nice for the most active players, but that sort of update just does not sell to a wider audience. If someone who wasn't too into minecraft and only plays after each update is announced with their friends for a bit saw a basically "adding stuff that was already announced years ago" update, they'd probably not be as excited as seeing brand new ideas announced and implemented to the game

[@SashaMasonVR]

But then you announce those brand new ideas only to exclude some of them, or add new blocks that exist purely as placeholder and then never get around to doing something with it, and it just gets more and more people disappointed over time. Imagine announcing an update and setting certain expectations only to not deliver on them at all and then wondering what happened with those ideas? Like with the Fletcher Table, that thing still feels like a placeholder block that was meant to be used for something but they just forgot about it.

[@zekrom916]

People need to realize that Mojang has not shown all their cards yet. I doubt all the stuff shown is "most" of it. They'll slowly show off more and more over time before June

[@InfamousJRP]

I feel like 1.20 isn't as bad as other people think. First of all, they said that as time goes on, more features will be added to it. Also, it will be an opportunity for Mojang to ask the community what features they want. Also, having a smaller update with more quality of life features is better than a big update in which most of the features won't even be added in my opinion. The standards for Minecraft updates are too high nowadays, which is the only reason people hate this update.

[@aarter2913]

The standard for minecraft updates increasing can basically be blamed on 1.13 and almost every update past that lol

[@Cobgd]

8:40 to make it not feel random mojang could make it so you only pick it up if you are holding the shulker box, making it faster but organized

[@miniiore]

omgggg guys gd youtuber spotted!!!!!!!!!!

[@BonziBUDDY]

Y'all sleepin on bundles. I've been caving a lot with like 2 bundles and it saves a lot of space. Especially since the raw ores were introduced. You can compress 9 items into 1 and it will only take up 1 slot in the bundle. You couldn't do that with the ore blocks themselves. For example, 63 iron ore blocks will take up 63 slots in the bundle vs 63 raw iron which can be compressed into 7 raw iron blocks that take up 7 slots in the bundle. Also helps when you have little amounts of various resources that you don't want to throw away.

[@thetruetrident]

0:58 you convieniently left out the fact that half of 1.15 was dedicated ENTIRELY to optimizing the bugs and performance issues caused by 1.13. Honestly, vanilla performance isn't even that bad. On 1.19.2, with 12chunks on a moderately low-end pc, I can get 60fps (which is pretty good imo)

[@alfredwaldo6079]

Bro do you have a low end NASA computer I would get like 10 fps and realistic flames

[@FluffsuneGaming]

I'm sure its not the game itself but the programming language. I believe my coder friend once equated the difference between Java and C++ in terms of performance being the performance difference between a 60's Volks Beetle and a Lambo 2010.

[@thebreadbunny1863]

EXACTLY

[@ccsleepy8342]

I saw a lot of people happy that the update didn’t overpromise. I happen to love everything introduced. I feel really disappointed about the lack of promised features too though. Caves and cliffs was underwhelming too. There’s nothing to hint at another end update. I want another update for performance improvements. For 1.13+, that update was 1.15. 1.20 appears to be a smaller update, so I really hope it comes with hefty performance improvements as well. And then inventory update needs to follow. I don’t know if it’s possible to get bedrock’s redstone mechanics exactly the same, and in reality a lot of technical players play Minecraft in a way most players don’t. They seem similar enough that a lot of basic devices should operate the same.

[@darkithnamgedrf9495]

Yeah ik I understand that the cave generation took a long time to tweak and such but only having three “biomes” added was disappointing and not much is even in those biomes. I scarcely even call the drip stone caves a biome, I mean they are literally just regular caves with drip stone, no different generation, mobs, blocks. Where are the mobs??? The only new cave mob we got was the warden and by their own account shouldn’t even be fought

[@Kamfys]

bedrock runs on a completely different system then java tho :l

[@spoabz2390]

@@darkithnamgedrf9495 nah I think the caves and cliffs update was perfect, I mean we got exactly what we wanted - a major upgrade to the caves, mountains and terrain generation. More biomes should've been added in the 'Wild' Update to make the game more 'Wild' , but instead we got 1 biome, 3 new mobs (2 of which do not exist irl) and 1 structure.

[@TheBloopers30]

@@spoabz2390 I love the new caves but I also think that they feel kinda empty and I would've loved just one more cave biome. If they decide to add one in the future new chunks needs to be loaded which is the one disadvantage of not going all out when revamping world gen.

[@aarter2913]

Many people hated 1.15, so sadly most people don't care about optimization and just want content

[@ThatPhatGoose]

1:33 that hurts... that's my normal performance...

[@Customfurball28]

my guy, 1.20 isn't done and it also had 0 chance of being an end update. i’m pretty certain that some things like mob vote losers will be in this update but its not out yet and there’s no reason to say it’s got a lot left to he desired. we’re only 1 week after minecraft live and we already have a huge amount of content available. there’s a LOT more to come.

[@paulthegreat99]

Dynamic chest loot is cool but I feel like most people would just start a world, maybe find a temple, then afk for an irl day and get op loot without really playing.

[@IntelEdits]

Minecraft doesn’t seem to have their priorities straight at all with these updates and it’s sad

[@benspouse9840]

I don’t understand it. It’s the Features that we’re the first to be done… of course they won’t be big, crazy things!

[@Gamer_Dylan_6]

Request from the minecraft community: Add impactful new features to the game, but don't change the game too much, but also don't focus on adding new features until the game is optimized, but also please never go back on something you say you'll do, and also make sure that everything you show us is exactly how it appears when the update is done, but also keep giving us snapshots, and also make the end as interesting as the nether, and also update combat so it's more like 1.8 combat but not completely like 1.8 combat because people also like 1.9 combat now, and also put better mobs in the mob vote and make sure that you finish designing the mob entirely before asking us which one to not throw away, and also add guns and backpacks and accessory slots that could only work on a computer, and have all of this done my next minecon because if one person in their free time with no deadlines, shareholders, or nagging online critics can do it then why can't you?

[@HungryWarden]

I don’t even remember the last time someone asked for a firearm in Minecraft, but you’re right about the other things.

[@hhkjk5452]

minecraft has so much potential with these kinds of updates but so little is being done, hope this changes soon

[@rosariobono438]

The hell you mean “should’ve been” it’s still getting more features

[@im_memiest8281]

With the update structure loot portion of the video I think having it detect achievements for it to decide what loot you get would work better than checking time played.

[@notme232]

You mean I can't leave a world open all week while I'm at work and come back to get the super loot from the villages?

[@JakeArtist13]

It was never stated the the rascal was gonna add a backpack as far as I know

[@Eatingguy]

I feel like what they showed is cool, but there’s some things that I wish they could add

[@tinobiushecht-4205]

I'm glad to see that people don't blindly follow everything Mojang says, but criticize their decisions. Mojang should definitely listen to channels like TheMisterEpic.

[@commentOwO]

I don't think an inventory update is that necessary, I feel like inventory management is a key part of the game

[@drishaanpaliwal]

Optifine and Sodium works on PC (Java), not Console, Mobile, Playstation, Xbox, etc.. (Bedrock) and the Dev team cannot leave parity behind...

[@rasp_]

Minecraft: The Minecraft Update

[@noah-vi1kq]

Idea: not let the daycount decide the chest loot, but your achievement progress - it would not only be a more accurate representation of the players progress, but also be finally a reason to hunt achievements.

[@Kuartle]

1:27 What it feels like to walk in the marketplace on bedrock

[@yttrmia]

While I do agree with most of the criticisms in this video, the "What 1.20 should have been" title of this video is a bit flawed. While the snapshot we got of 1.20 is very bare with changes, not only is 1.20 not even fully out yet it's also being kept mostly a secret about what's going to be in the game after the previous 3 updates failed to deliver on promises. As such, this seems more like a video on what this and future updates should focus on, as it highlights glaring problems with the game and Mojang's massive backlog this and future updates should prioritize. Honestly, it makes more sense to rag on previous, already-finished versions - primarily 1.19 - for not addressing some of the issues in this video, rather than saying an unfinished version should have fixed it. Performance not being made better in the snapshot I can understand not understanding why it isn't fixed, but the same could be said of all previous versions for not addressing as well, and they went by without addressing it at all. Besides that, I agree that this is all stuff Mojang should focus on in the future. The framing of the video is just the one real problem.

[@moreno_cookie5782]

I disagree with your opinion of bundles In my opinion it's a really great for early game storage before getting a shulker box even if you already have a shulker box the bundles are still useful for organising.

[@VintageMC22]

Yea bundles would be excellent early game and would hold value for a player like me constantly looting and exploring vast amounts of my would, would only extend my hunt

[@SashaMasonVR]

Exactly. The idea of bundles isn't "Adding more storage", it's about using existing storage more efficiently by being able to stack blocks and items together that you usually cannot stack together at all and each take up their own inventory space. If you have 5 different colors of flowers, that's 5 inventory spots gone just for flowers even if you only have a few each.

[@ult1mat392]

1.20 couldve lowkey been called "The Forgotten Update" or smth like that

[@wyrdvora]

It's not finished ffs. They literally said in the live that they only showed what's finished

[@Xiiki]

I don’t think the ends will actually ever be updated.

[@henryash413]

If chest loot was based off of player progression, then players simply wouldn't raid structure chests until they have legitimately (slowly) climbed up the power ladder. The loot will always be sitting there waiting for you, so why right click it now when you could play Minecraft for a few hours and get 10 times better loot later on. I don't think this system fits in with the game, things get even more awkward when you start abusing the system with multiplayer.

[@crémoss69]

It's sad how little is Mojang doing for some aspects of their game.

[@fernandoflores8449]

About the optimization thingy XIsumavoid did a video that i think is a really good answer as of why they dont do it. I think ti was "Could they add optifine to minecraft" and if not probably was "why cant mojang develop like modders" Also i kinda get mixed inputs on your take on bundles i feel like you dont like the fact that they are not in the game yet but you also wont like them once they are here LOL

[@TheSultan1470]

Mister The Epic = clueless guy

[@Wolvus1]

Mojang actually wanted to implement optifine into minecraft but the dev refused. Mojang has every legal right to copy mods made for their game into it but chose to respect the work and wishes of the moddingcommunity.

[@KajtekBeary]

They wanted to buy optifine, and actually, they don’t have the right to the code, so no, they aren’t just polite, they strictly can’t add it.

[@Wolvus1]

​@@KajtekBeary I just remember all the drama this caused in 2014 but i went to check the current eula and its quite complex. It states: "If you make any content available on or through our Game, you agree to give us permission to use, copy, modify, adapt, distribute, and publicly display that content ... you are not giving up your ownership rights in your content, you are just giving us and other users permission to use it." Specificity on mod ownership it says: "Any Mods you create for the Game from scratch belong to you and you can do whatever you want with them, as long as you don't sell them for money / try to make money from them" But they also say " We have the final say on what constitutes a Mod and what doesn't. " It was argues back during the 2014 eula drama that mojangs legal team could decide something inst a mod but content available for their game and therefore have the legal right to copy and use it. It also bring in question whether a mod dev can legal even sell their mod to mojang (though i do indeed remember something of them offering to pay for optifine).

[@OneLikeOthers]

Despite agreeing with many of your points, i think there are some that need to be adressed with skepticism. First of all, Mojang being owned by a mega corporation with billions of dollars, isn't a guarantee that they can easily work out a solution to a complicated problem, in fact there are 2 videos on youtube that explain why it's not (the video on optimization by xisumavoid and the one made by Minecraft's ideas academy on the claims of Mojang being lazy). Second, bundles are not meant to solve all the problems with the inventory, but rather a very specific problem with it that even having an inventory expansion in the way you proposed can't solve (despite having a similar idea myself called the toolbelt that allows you to extend your inventory and maybe even upgrade your crafting grid by placing specific items inside it, i guess great minds think alike). And for last, the idea of 1.20 being the end update was a mistake that could be seen from far away, because there are many features supposed to lead up to the endgame that need a revamp before the endgame itself, the end dimension is not (or it's at least NOT meant to be) in the same place as the nether in the game's progression, the latter is in the mid point and the former should be the climax. Sorry for writing the divine comedy, thank you for reading if you did.

[@Tortilla_Pizzeria_Pixels]

This is really what it should be. At this point in time, I could care less about new features. I want Mojang to fix everything up, and then, when everything is finally caught up and bug free, they implement more features.

[@ohfox5511]

My thoughts too.

[@theotherbird8381]

The birch forest was never announced to be updated

[@DeekshithSH]

11:42 That's your opinion That's like Changing the Redstone logic to a Bugged Redstone logic as a Bedrock player. Why you think Parity Change like Bedrock should become like java why not Java should become like Bedrock. + Microsoft already released a Minecraft Windows Edition if you want Both Version to Look and Behave like the same you can just Switch to Minecraft Windows Edition Only exception is Linux, Unix, BSD and Macintosh Users

[@SashaMasonVR]

Because Bedrock Redstone is broken. Java Redstone, despite it's "unintentional features" isn't. The fact that the exact same setup, on Bedrock, can produce multiple different outcomes seemingly at random should tell you enough how broken it is. Java Redstone always works the exact same. It doesn't randomly produce a different outcome with the same input. Redstone builds end up working sometimes, and sometimes not. Other counter argument, Java is older, it's the OG Minecraft, if anything Bedrock should stick to the original, not Java become like it's remake.

[@Bonk2027]

Remember before flaming what we have now, know that they only showed finished items and things that were complete and confirmed. There’s still a lot of stuff to be made

[@rugertheconqueror]

Definitely can agree with you we really do need a tying up Loose Ends update for both Editions fix major problems on both sides bring the two together on parity!

[@Kingfloppyznewofficial]

Remember that these are only the 100% done features more is coming

[@TheRealGemKeeper]

Mojang is slowly becoming another Bethesda… Instead of adding new content to their popular games they just let the community mod it instead

[@GB-sr9kv]

alternate title: my opinion on what i think minecraft 1.20 should be

[@modernadventurer2]

Minecraft has historically had down updates between large updates. I’m hoping 1.20 fixes a couple things and has no major features. 1.21 then is the end update.

[@Kamfys]

it shouldnt be 'should HAVE been' it should have been 'Should be' since the update isnt even done yet

[@kk_butterfly]

It's still a possibility for us to get other features in 1.20 they just only announced things that were finished or about to be finished to not dissapoint the us like the last few years.

[@noobplayerx8607]

The issue of Minecraft java performance is not going to change significantly in a long time, there are several options that Mojang can take without having to change the game code, these can be: Add the option that the height of the water does not have transparency and decrease the amount of grass that spawns in a world, I don't know why they haven't made this change or added this option, since this exists in the Bedrock version of Minecraft. The issue of Bedrock version bugs is something that has always bothered me and I can't find any logical explanation as to why they are not solved, as it is possible that Mojang does not pay attention to the version that generates more money, for example; when a small lighting bug is reported in minecraft java it doesn't take more than 2 weeks to fix it, on the other hand in bedrock it takes months to fix it, it's not possible that if they're aware of it and don't take care of the performance, it doesn't surprise me anymore none of this, I expected nothing less from you mojang, many blame Microsoft, but they only included micropayments and chat bans (Which is bullshit). Mojang is the one that decides to give more importance to spin-offs than to the main game, and I don't consider myself a hater of Mojang or its games, Minecraft is my favorite game and I consider Mojang programmers to be very good people, but I can't defend its shortcomings as a developer studio, comment if you think the same.

[@BeepBoopBee]

It's a good idea to have a tying up loose ends update. But it's also a bit annoying that people complain about how they're not gonna get certain features when they've only released the first snapshot and made it clear they'd only talk about/show off features that were far enough in development to definitely get added. They will most likely add many more things, so it's a bit misleading and quite annoying that people already label the update as underwhelming.

[@norbertochnik3006]

9:45 I would tie dynamic loot to advancements, it would play nice with progresion and ecourage players to actually do them and any given advancement could have an effect on loot in a surtain way, like diamods advancement could add diamond stuff into the lootpool and so on, this also would go well with custom advancements on something like rpg maps, luck potions effect could complete the next few random advancements in advancement tree, one tier up

[@dtslawyer6970]

given on bedrock, achievements are per player and not per world, it would require adding advancements from java to bedrock, but that’s really the only problem i’d see with this

[@notme232]

It's not that 1.20 is only releasing 4 features, it's that they didn't announce everything at once. Looking at how the caves & cliffs update ended up taking 3 releases to become fully 'complete', and all the other back logged things they promised. This isn't the first time, 1.12 was supposed to be the aquatic update, but that got pushed to 1.13. On the bright side, they are honest about it and have never released an update in a completely unplayable state. Some features may be unfinished or broken but the game is always still playable, they never had a CP2077 flop. It seems they decided to stop over promising at Minecon and to release/announce things as they are ready like it was in the earlier days. I remember in the early snapshots things would just appear and disappear without notice. Features were officially announced when the version was released. Another thing to remember is that these updates are free, and snapshots don't have to exist at all. Look at all the content added from 1.0 to 1.19 in the past 11 years, all of it for free. Name another game that has that has been supported for this long, consistently and for free. Minecraft could just as easily be like city skylines or sims with every little feature costing $5, $10 or $15. Nope, the updates are just free, with a cool beta program (snapshots) built right in and you get the ability to play any version ever released.

[@HelloGamesOld]

The bundle was made to deal with lots of items that are not a full stack so you have 2 flowers, 3coblle stone, 4granite and they take up 3 inventory slots but if u have a bundle they take up 1 inventory slot

[@egon3705]

yeah it's really convenient if you, say, carry around a crafting table but then you can also store other things in the bundle like diamonds

[@KajtekBeary]

Basically everything that you would just throw away and keep one empty slot!

[@Faurded]

With what they are adding right now, it doesn’t look like the End is getting overhauled in this update. Adding the previously announced but still unimplemented features like termites, meerkats, vultures, as well as other biome improvements, seems the best way to go here. I’d love to see the performance, combat (including hunger) and inventory getting completely overhauled, but I assume they’re gonna ignore that completely or just say it’s not in the spirit of minecraft or something

[@lasercraft32]

Why aren't they prioritizing the performance issues? Well, probably because performance fixes don't get good publicity... Flashy new blocks and mobs like camels and new wood types do. Especially for their supposed target audience of "exclusively" children. That and the fact that everyone already uses performance enhancing mods, there are fewer people complaining and asking for performance fixes since the mods already fill that role (its dumb, yes, but its true).

[@yisus.avocado]

Saying the Rascal would bring the game a backpack is as crazy as saying the glow squid would introduce dynamic lighting IMO.

[@shotgunwasthere7336]

The idea of a loot change based on the in-game day is not bad at all but i think that it would be abused in multiplayer since even if you log off as long as the server is on you will get better loot. So my idea is to change the loot based on the advancement system the more advancments you unlock the better your loot is. Plus it would make dificult and unececary advancements such as how did we get here or caves and cliffs a lot more usefull.